2010-11-22T19:00:00Z opencongress.org tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/59797 tag:opencongress.org,2010-11-22:/commentary/9834555 2010-11-22T19:00:00Z NY Daily Record A comprehensive judgeship bill has not been enacted since 1992, and omnibus judgeship legislation, introduced this session by Leahy in the Senate (S. 1653) and Rep. Henry C. Johnson, D-Ga., in the House ( H.R. 3662), is not likely to ...<br /><br /><a href="http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2010/11/23/judicial-vacancies-reaching-crisis-point/">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2010-09-15:/commentary/9128841 2010-09-15T20:00:00Z Introduced Legislation -- Tracked by GovTrack.us 18 Jun 2007 <br /><br /><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-1653">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2010-09-14:/commentary/9168228 2010-09-14T20:00:00Z Government Policy On September 8, 2009, S. 1653 was introduced in the Senate to authorize the establishment of additional federal circuit and district judges to help reduce backlogs in the nation&#39;s caseload. The bill would authorize the appointment of a ...<br /><br /><a href="http://government-policy.blogspot.com/2010/09/crs-issue-statement-on-oversight-and.html">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2010-09-14:/commentary/9128840 2010-09-14T20:00:00Z Penny Hill Press On September 8, 2009, S. 1653 was introduced in the Senate to authorize the establishment of additional federal circuit and district judges to help reduce backlogs in the nation&#39;s caseload. The bill would authorize the appointment of a ...<br /><br /><a href="http://www2.pennyhill.com/?p=10745">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2010-05-04:/commentary/8345959 2010-05-04T20:00:00Z Washington University Law Review 17, 2009, http://www.uscourts.gov/judconf/09-Mar.pdf; see S.1653, 111th Cong. (2009); John G. Roberts, Jr., 2009 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary, The Third Branch (Admin. Office of the U.S. Courts, Office of Pub. ...<br /><br /><a href="http://lawreview.wustl.edu/commentaries/diversity-and-the-federal-bench/">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2010-05-04:/commentary/8308880 2010-05-04T20:00:00Z Washington University Law Review 17, 2009, http://www.uscourts.gov/judconf/09-Mar.pdf; see S.1653, 111th Cong. (2009); John G. Roberts, Jr., 2009 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary, The Third Branch (Admin. Office of the U.S. Courts, Office of Pub. ...<br /><br /><a href="http://lawreview.wustl.edu/comments/diversity-and-the-federal-bench/">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-02:/commentary/8712949 2010-03-02T19:00:00Z The H2: Sneaking A Peek At Your Sister... A subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing Wednesday on the proposed Federal Judgeship Act of 2009 (S. 1653), which would create positions for 63 new federal judges – 51 in federal district courts and 12 in ...<br /><br /><a href="http://thehostages.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/this-is-the-end/">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2010-01-21:/commentary/7349533 2010-01-21T19:00:00Z The Defenders Online | A Civil Rights Blog Additionally, the Federal Judgeship Act of 2009 (S. 1653), which contains recommendations for new vacancies by the Judicial Conference of the United States, would create over 60 more vacancies. Despite the vast number of openings, ...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/01/22/the-missed-opportunity-of-a-lifetime/">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-23:/commentary/7054572 2009-12-23T19:00:00Z FindLaw's Writ ...of work and case loads, suggesting that all these additional seats that are needed. Senator Leahy has introduced the bill, S.1653, and has conducted a hearing on it. Judges should give thanks, too, that the 111th Congress has seriously assessed the qu<br /><br /><a href="http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20091125_tobias.html">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2009-11-23:/commentary/6852546 2009-11-23T19:00:00Z The Third Branch: Newsletter of the Federal Courts S. 1653, the Federal Judgeship Act of 2009, was introduced on September 8, 2009, by Judiciary Committee Chair Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT). On September 29, H.R. 3662, also called the Federal Judgeship Act of 2009, was introduced in the ...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.uscourts.gov/ttb/2009-11/article03.cfm">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2009-10-22:/commentary/6529970 2009-10-22T20:00:00Z The Third Branch: Newsletter of the Federal Courts Singal thanked Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, for introducing S. 1653, which reflects the Judicial Conference recommendation that Congress establish 63 new judgeships in the courts of appeals and ...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.uscourts.gov/ttb/2009-10/article02.cfm">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2009-10-12:/commentary/6382733 2009-10-12T20:00:00Z Common American Journal Ordinary Americans seeking to inform and inspire our fellow Patriots in these extraordinary times.<br /><br /><a href="http://commonamericanjournal.com/?p=4163">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2009-10-08:/commentary/6356965 2009-10-08T20:00:00Z Netizen News Brief A subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing Wednesday on the proposed Federal Judgeship Act of 2009 (S. 1653), which would create positions for 63 new federal judges - 51 in federal district courts and 12 in ...<br /><br /><a href="http://netizennewsbrief.blogspot.com/2009/10/democrats-try-to-pack-courts.html">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2009-10-01:/commentary/6322736 2009-10-01T20:00:00Z OPINION &quot;A subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing Wednesday on the proposed Federal Judgeship Act of 2009 (S. 1653), which would create positions for 63 new federal judges - 51 in federal district courts and 12 in ...<br /><br /><a href="http://dallasmorningviewsblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/10/can-a-state-dis.html">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2009-10-01:/commentary/6276148 2009-10-01T20:00:00Z Liberty's Army Tagged as: S.1653: Federal Judgeship Act of 2009 &middot; Cancel reply. Leave a Comment. Name *. E-mail *. Website. Comment Policy Statement. We encourage you to participate in the Liberty&#39;s Army Blog by commenting. All comments are moderated. ...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.libertysarmy.com/2009/10/02/legislation/s-1653-federal-judgeship-act-of-2009/">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-29:/commentary/6255982 2009-09-29T20:00:00Z Betsy's Page A subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing Wednesday on the proposed Federal Judgeship Act of 2009 (S. 1653), which would create positions for 63 new federal judges - 51 in federal district courts and 12 in ...<br /><br /><a href="http://betsyspage.blogspot.com/2009/09/democratic-court-packing-plan.html">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-27:/commentary/6246916 2009-09-27T20:00:00Z Just Americans Making Ethical Statements Weblog A subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing Wednesday on the proposed Federal Judgeship Act of 2009 (S. 1653), which would create positions for 63 new federal judges – 51 in federal district courts and 12 in ...<br /><br /><a href="http://james4america.wordpress.com/2009/09/28/obama-emulates-fdr-and-seeks-to-pack-the-courts/">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-27:/commentary/6236894 2009-09-27T20:00:00Z ADF Alliance Alert » Bench & Bar Washington Times: “A subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing Wednesday on the proposed Federal Judgeship Act of 2009 (S. 1653), which would create positions for 63 new federal judges – 51 in federal district ...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/28/democrats-try-to-pack-the-courts/">Go to article</a> tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-25:/commentary/6215892 2009-09-25T20:00:00Z Thoughts From A Conservative Mom A subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing Wednesday on the proposed Federal Judgeship Act of 2009 (S. 1653), which would create positions for 63 new federal judges - 51 in federal district courts and 12 in ...<br /><br /><a href="http://thoughtsfromaconservativemom.blogspot.com/2009/09/democrats-try-to-pack-courts.html">Go to article</a>