S.3628 - DISCLOSE Act

A bill to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit foreign influence in Federal elections, to prohibit government contractors from making expenditures with respect to such elections, and to establish additional disclosure requirements with respect to spending in such elections, and for other purposes. view all titles (4)

All Bill Titles

Official: A bill to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit foreign influence in Federal elections, to prohibit government contractors from making expenditures with respect to such elections, and to establish additional disclosure requirements with respect to spending in such elections, and for other purposes. as introduced.
Popular: DISCLOSE Act as introduced.
Short: Democracy is Strengthened by Casting Light on Spending in Elections Act as introduced.
Short: DISCLOSE Act as introduced.

This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.

Sort By

Comments Feed

Filtered Comment [ show ]

GinoMan2440 09/24/2010 6:57am

Link Reply
+ -6

↓

↑ Overall Rating: 1.0 | 0 of 6 found useful.

One sentence: Even the ACLU who are as leftist as they get, oppose this bill as being against the first amendment… that’s pretty bad, not gonna lie. This bill better not pass or we will lose our free speech and other civil rights more than we already have. It’s biased, partisan, and it’s sole purpose is for the democrats to prevent the tea party and right organizations and groups from advertising the incumbents with their “democratic” (worst description of their political ideology) agenda out of office and restoring the values this country used to hold. only 20% of the users support this bill, it’s travesty that the congress would vote a majority for it.
Filtered Comment [ show ]

Pathwerker 11/16/2010 1:46am

Link Reply
+ 1

↓

↑ Overall Rating: 5.0 | 1 of 1 found useful.

One Sentence: This bill will restore the values this country used to hold by taking the free speech given by the Roberts court to each dollar bill and returning it to the people.
Filtered Comment [ show ]

Student2010 10/10/2010 12:09pm

Link Reply
+ 5

↓

↑ Overall Rating: 5.0 | 5 of 5 found useful.

Large donations to campaigns aren’t wrong, secret donations ARE. This is’nt against freedom of speech, its against buying elections, people should know who is sponsoring our government officials.
Filtered Comment [ show ]

jml6m 10/15/2010 9:57am

Link Reply
+ 5

↓

↑ Overall Rating: 5.0 | 5 of 5 found useful.

Why would you ever opposed this? Oh right, half the users on this site have been brainwashed by Fox News.
Filtered Comment [ show ]

dnd3edm1 11/16/2010 1:20pm

Link Reply
+ 1

↓

↑ Overall Rating: 5.0 | 1 of 1 found useful.

Just look at the laundry list of special interests that oppose the bill to get an idea of what we’re really looking at. Do we want these powerful organizations secretly funneling money into politics? Do we want attack ads to be the only source of voter information? The attack ads were actually worse this year, it’s not your imagination, and killing these private donations is simply going to provide us the most basic protection against the nightmare of our democracy- secret interests expressing absolute control over politics.