The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowS.398 - Idaho Efficient Vehicle Demonstration Act of 200
A bill to permit commercial vehicles at weights up to 129,000 pounds to use certain highways of the Interstate System in the State of Idaho which would provide significant savings in the transportation of goods throughout the United States, and for other purposes.

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
S 398 ISCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
111th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
1st SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
S. 398CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To permit commercial vehicles at weights up to 129,000 pounds to use certain highways of the Interstate System in the State of Idaho which would provide significant savings in the transportation of goods throughout the United States, and for other purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
February 9, 2009CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
February 9, 2009CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Mr. CRAPO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public WorksCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To permit commercial vehicles at weights up to 129,000 pounds to use certain highways of the Interstate System in the State of Idaho which would provide significant savings in the transportation of goods throughout the United States, and for other purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘Idaho Efficient Vehicle Demonstration Act of 2009’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) States including Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming have been grandfathered the right to operate up to 129,000-pound or greater vehicle combinations on 9 axles or more on Federal highways;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) laws governing Federal highway funding effectively impose a limit of 105,500 pounds on the weight of vehicles permitted to use the Interstate System within the State of Idaho;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) the State of Idaho is surrounded by the States specified in paragraph (1) that allow higher weight limits on the Interstate System, which puts the State of Idaho at a disadvantage in moving freight within Idaho and into those surrounding States;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) in 2003, the legislature of the State of Idaho adopted House Bill 395, which established a 10-year pilot project that allows vehicle combinations up to 129,000 pounds to be operated on 10 axles on specific routes in that State, but does not address the Interstate System;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) in enacting the pilot project program in House Bill 395 of the State, the legislature required the Idaho Transportation Department to report to the legislature on the effect of the program;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) the Idaho Transportation Department is required to submit reports every 3 years during the 10-year life of the pilot project program that describe the results of monitoring and evaluation of all important impacts, including impacts to safety, bridges, and pavement, on all pilot project routes;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(7) the pilot project program terminates on July 1, 2013, unless the program is otherwise extended or sooner repealed by the legislature;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(8) the administration of the pilot project, coupled with the fact that vehicle combinations cannot operate at 129,000 pounds on the Interstate System, has forced those heavier vehicle combinations to divert onto small State and local roads on which higher vehicle weight limits are allowed under State law;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(9) the diversion of those vehicles onto those roads increases fuel costs because of increased idling time and total travel time along those roads;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(10) the cost of transportation fuel has increased more than 80 percent between calendar years 2007 and 2008; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(11) permitting commercial vehicles to travel on a select few Interstate System highways within the State at increased weight limits would provide--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) significant savings in the transportation of goods throughout the State; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) substantial data and an opportunity for analysis of the impacts of the vehicles on bridges, highway safety, and pavements.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) COVERED INTERSTATE SYSTEM HIGHWAY- The term ‘covered Interstate System highway’ means any portion of a highway designated as a route on the Interstate System that, as of the date of enactment of this Act, is not exempt from the requirements of subsection (a) of
(2) DIRECTOR- The term ‘Director’ means the Director of the Idaho Transportation Department.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) INTERSTATE SYSTEM- The term ‘Interstate System’ has the meaning given the term in
(4) PILOT PROJECT- The term ‘pilot project’ means the 10-year pilot project of the State, established in 2003 under House Bill 395 of the State, that permits vehicle combinations weighing up to 129,000 pounds to be operated on specific routes in that State.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) SECRETARY- The term ‘Secretary’ means the Secretary of Transportation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) STATE- The term ‘State’ means the State of Idaho.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 4. WAIVER OF HIGHWAY FUNDING REDUCTION RELATING TO WEIGHT OF VEHICLES USING INTERSTATE SYSTEM HIGHWAYS.
(a) Prohibition Relating to Certain Vehicles- Notwithstanding
(b) Combination Vehicles in Excess of 105,500 Pounds up to 129,000 Pounds- A vehicle described in this subsection is a vehicle that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) has a weight in excess of 105,500 pounds but not more than 129,000 pounds;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) consists of a power unit hauling 2 or more trailers or semitrailers;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) does not exceed any vehicle weight limitation that is applicable under State law to the operation of the vehicle on highways in the State that are not part of the Interstate System, as those laws are in effect on the date of enactment of this Act; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) is limited to travel only on--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) the portion of Interstate Route 15 extending from the Montana border to the junction with Interstate Route 86;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) the portion of Interstate Route 86 extending from the junction of Interstate Route 15 to the junction with Interstate Route 84; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) the portion of Interstate Route 84 extending from the Utah border to the Oregon border.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Termination of Authority-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) IN GENERAL- Subject to paragraph (2), this section and the authority provided under this section shall terminate on July 1, 2013.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) EXCEPTIONS- This section and the authority provided under this section shall terminate on--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) a date that is later than the date specified in paragraph (1), if the project is extended to that later date by the State; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) any date that is before, on, or after the date specified in paragraph (1), if the Secretary--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) determines that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(I) operation of vehicles described in subsection (b) on covered Interstate System highways has adversely affected safety on the overall highway system; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(II) the Director has failed to collect the data described in section 5(2); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) publishes the determination, together with the date of termination of this section, in the Federal Register.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Consultation Regarding Termination for Safety- In making a determination under subsection (c)(2)(A)(i), the Secretary shall consult with the Director.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 5. RESPONSIBILITIES OF STATE.
For the purpose of section 4, the State shall be considered to meet the conditions under this section if the Director--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) submits to the Secretary a plan for use in meeting the conditions described in paragraph (2); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) collects data on the net effects that the operation of vehicles described in section 4(b) on covered Interstate System highways in the State has on the safety of the overall highway system, as required by House Bill 395 of the State.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
Top-Rated Comments
- “It's time to foreclose, pay the "piper" and start over, and be accountab...” DJJ
- “I haven't been able to see the bill on this site but... It's a dangerou...” UserNotLogggedIn
Recent OC Blog Articles
- Yes, let's stride towards an open VCS for legislation (or, GitHub for laws on OC) May 23, 2012
- Congress Refuses to #FreeTHOMAS (updated) May 17, 2012
- Yochai Benkler: Blueprint for Democratic Participation May 10, 2012
- New NDAA Would Give the Military Clandestine Cyberwar Powers May 08, 2012
- The Week Ahead in Congress May 07, 2012

U.S. Congress - Text of S.398 as Introduced in Senate Idaho Efficient Vehicle Demonstration Act of 200



