<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : News Articles for S.773 Cybersecurity Act of 2009</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s773/atom_news" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s773/news" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2010-12-20T19:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/news/56482</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Is the End Game of Wikileaks Internet Censorship?</title>
    <link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/r_cVIe3sTRA/end-game-wikileaks-internet-censorship" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-12-20:/commentary/10142569</id>
    <updated>2010-12-20T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Zero Hedge</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...scandal. In 2009 Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller and Republican Olympia Snowe introduced the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S.773). It would give the President unlimited power to disconnect private-sector computers from the internet. The bill &quot;would allo&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/r_cVIe3sTRA/end-game-wikileaks-internet-censorship&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Wikileaks: A Big Dangerous US Government Con Job</title>
    <link href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1012/S00138/wikileaks-a-big-dangerous-us-government-con-job.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-12-12:/commentary/10047049</id>
    <updated>2010-12-12T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Scoop.co.nz</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In 2009 Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller and Republican Olympia Snowe introduced the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S.773). It would give the President ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1012/S00138/wikileaks-a-big-dangerous-us-government-con-job.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&amp;#39;Cables and Leaks: Friends and Foes&amp;#39; By Erick San Juan (Makati City)</title>
    <link href="http://www.mindanaoexaminer.com/news.php?news_id=20101213091134" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-12-12:/commentary/10046978</id>
    <updated>2010-12-12T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mindanao Examiner</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In 2009 Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller and Republican Olympia Snowe introduced the Cyber Security Act of 2009 (S.773). It would give the US President ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindanaoexaminer.com/news.php?news_id=20101213091134&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Wikileaks: A Big U.S. Government Con Job</title>
    <link href="http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article24943.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-12-10:/commentary/10033521</id>
    <updated>2010-12-10T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Market Oracle</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...leaks scandal. In 2009 Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller and Republican Olympia Snowe introduced the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S.773). It would give the President unlimited power to disconnect private-sector computers from the internet. The bill &quot;woul&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article24943.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Wikileaks: A Big Dangerous US Government Con Job</title>
    <link href="http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/12/10/wikileaks-a-big-dangerous-us-government-con-job/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-12-09:/commentary/10061706</id>
    <updated>2010-12-09T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Veterans Today Network</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In 2009 Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller and Republican Olympia Snowe introduced the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S.773). It would give the President ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/12/10/wikileaks-a-big-dangerous-us-government-con-job/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.voltairenet.org/article167733.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-12-09:/commentary/10030103</id>
    <updated>2010-12-09T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Voltaire Network</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In 2009 Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller and Republican Olympia Snowe introduced the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S.773). IIt would give the President ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.voltairenet.org/article167733.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Wikileaks: A Big  Dangerous US Government Con Job</title>
    <link href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&amp;amp;code=20101210&amp;amp;articleId=22357" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-12-09:/commentary/10026916</id>
    <updated>2010-12-09T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Global Research</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...leaks scandal. In 2009 Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller and Republican Olympia Snowe introduced the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S.773). It would give the President unlimited power to disconnect private-sector computers from the internet. The bill &quot;woul&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&amp;amp;code=20101210&amp;amp;articleId=22357&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Der ausl&#228;ndische Broker und sein deutscher Vermittler</title>
    <link href="http://www.rechtslupe.de/wirtschaftsrecht/kapitalanlagerecht/der-auslaendische-broker-und-sein-deutscher-vermittler-323845" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-11-17:/commentary/9866727</id>
    <updated>2010-11-17T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rechtslupe</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 1972 II, S. 773, 774 ff.&#8617; vgl. EuGH, Urteile vom 30.11.1976 &#8211; 21/76, Slg. 1976, 1735, Tz. 8 ff. [Mines de Potasse d&amp;#39;Alsace]; vom 11.01.1990 &#8211; C-220/88, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rechtslupe.de/wirtschaftsrecht/kapitalanlagerecht/der-auslaendische-broker-und-sein-deutscher-vermittler-323845&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate swirls on overhauling cybersecurity certifications</title>
    <link href="http://www.nextgov.com/nextgov/ng_20101117_4910.php?oref=rss" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-11-16:/commentary/9747784</id>
    <updated>2010-11-16T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NextGov</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. But the 2009 Cybersecurity Act (S.773), introduced by Sen. John D. Rockefeller, D-W.Va., chairman of the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, w&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nextgov.com/nextgov/ng_20101117_4910.php?oref=rss&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Forecast for cybersecurity bills looks cloudy in reconvened Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.nextgov.com/nextgov/ng_20101115_4848.php?oref=topnews" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-11-14:/commentary/9728533</id>
    <updated>2010-11-14T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Nextgov</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 She added the 2009 Cybersecurity Act (S.773), sponsored by Sens. John Rockefeller, DW.Va.; Olympia Snowe, R-Maine; Barbara Mikulski, D-Md.; and Bill Nelson, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nextgov.com/nextgov/ng_20101115_4848.php?oref=topnews&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Forecast for cybersecurity bills looks cloudy in reconvened Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.nextgov.com/nextgov/ng_20101115_4848.php?oref=rss" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-11-14:/commentary/9723517</id>
    <updated>2010-11-14T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NextGov</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...Security and Governmental Affairs Committee reported the bill to the full chamber in June. She added the 2009 Cybersecurity Act (S.773), sponsored by Sens. John Rockefeller, D-W.Va.; Olympia Snowe, R-Maine; Barbara Mikulski, D-Md.; and Bill Nelson, D-Fl&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nextgov.com/nextgov/ng_20101115_4848.php?oref=rss&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Virtual Crimes - Real Damages: Challenges Posed By Cybercrimes In The United ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/current.php?artType=view&amp;amp;artMonth=November&amp;amp;artYear=2010&amp;amp;EntryNo=11630" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-11-01:/commentary/9579285</id>
    <updated>2010-11-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Metropolitan Coporate Counsel</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Senate&amp;#39;s cybersecurity legislation, S.773, is currently stalled. According to recent reports, industry opposition and the mid-term elections make it ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/current.php?artType=view&amp;amp;artMonth=November&amp;amp;artYear=2010&amp;amp;EntryNo=11630&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reviewing Project Censored&amp;#39;s Top 2009-10 Stories</title>
    <link href="http://www.countercurrents.org/lendman011110C.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-10-31:/commentary/9565739</id>
    <updated>2010-10-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CounterCurrents.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On April 1 last year, the Senate introduced two bills endangering a free and open Internet - S. 773: Cybersecurity Act of 2009 and S. 778 to establish a ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.countercurrents.org/lendman011110C.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reviewing Project Censored&amp;#39;s Top 2009-10 Stories</title>
    <link href="http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2010/10/30/reviewing-project-censored-s-top-2009-10" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-10-29:/commentary/9555267</id>
    <updated>2010-10-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The People&amp;#39;s Voice</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On April 1 last year, the Senate introduced two bills endangering a free and open Internet - S. 773: Cybersecurity Act of 2009 and S. 778 to establish a ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2010/10/30/reviewing-project-censored-s-top-2009-10&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>It isn&amp;#39;t God who is keeping track of our sins&#8230;..it is a Homeland Security ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_29281.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-08-24:/commentary/8983906</id>
    <updated>2010-08-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Liberty News On Line</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 S.773. Although billed as some &#8220;We love you and want to protect you from the boogie man on the net&#8221; bill, this abomination is clearly aimed at the free flow ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_29281.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity legislation update</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=8c72d1f2-025d-4a35-97fd-36466532c056" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-07-28:/commentary/8897510</id>
    <updated>2010-07-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 ... IV (D.-WV), co-author of the &#8220;Rockefeller-Snowe Cybersecurity Act,&#8221; (S. 773), the other main bill under consideration by the senators. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=8c72d1f2-025d-4a35-97fd-36466532c056&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Under Threat: A Free and Open Internet</title>
    <link href="http://baltimorechronicle.com/2010/071510Lendman.shtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-07-14:/commentary/8709729</id>
    <updated>2010-07-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Baltimore Chronicle</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On April 1, 2009, S. 773: Cybersecurity Act of 2009 was introduced, referred to committee, approved on March 24, 2010, but not thus far enacted in secretly ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://baltimorechronicle.com/2010/071510Lendman.shtml&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.overthelimit.info/scitec/2010/06/28/internet-kill-switch-legislation-passes-committee/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-06-27:/commentary/8615450</id>
    <updated>2010-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PC Magazine</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 S.773 was a giant tub of bad ideas, only a few of which survive in S.3480. Much of the initial press on the Lieberman bill state that it includes the &amp;quot;kill ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.overthelimit.info/scitec/2010/06/28/internet-kill-switch-legislation-passes-committee/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.product-reviews.net/2010/06/28/internet-kill-switch-bill-would-impose-limits/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-06-27:/commentary/8595365</id>
    <updated>2010-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PC Magazine</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 S.773 was a giant tub of bad ideas, only a few of which survive in S.3480. Much of the initial press on the Lieberman bill state that it includes the &amp;quot;kill ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.product-reviews.net/2010/06/28/internet-kill-switch-bill-would-impose-limits/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.newsoxy.com/technology/internet-kill-switch-13570.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-06-27:/commentary/8580775</id>
    <updated>2010-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PC Magazine</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 S.773 was a giant tub of bad ideas, only a few of which survive in S.3480. Much of the initial press on the Lieberman bill state that it includes the &amp;quot;kill ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsoxy.com/technology/internet-kill-switch-13570.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Oppose Cybersecurity Legislation and Presidential Kill-Switch</title>
    <link href="http://beforeitsnews.com/news/85/573/Oppose_Cybersecurity_Legislation_and_Presidential_Kill-Switch.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-06-23:/commentary/8652267</id>
    <updated>2010-06-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Before It&amp;#39;s News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Whether it&amp;#39;s S. 3480, the Lieberman/Collins/Carper caper that gets the nod, or the Rockefeller/Snowe job, S. 773, the American people need to loudly and ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://beforeitsnews.com/news/85/573/Oppose_Cybersecurity_Legislation_and_Presidential_Kill-Switch.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Preserve Internet Freedom -- Oppose Cybersecurity Legislation</title>
    <link href="http://www.jbs.org/component/content/article/1009-commentary/6366-preserve-internet-freedom-oppose-cybersecurity-legislation" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-06-22:/commentary/8554287</id>
    <updated>2010-06-22T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>John Birch Society</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Whether it&amp;#39;s S. 3480, the Lieberman/Collins/Carper caper that gets the nod, or the Rockefeller/Snowe job, S. 773, the American people need to loudly and ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jbs.org/component/content/article/1009-commentary/6366-preserve-internet-freedom-oppose-cybersecurity-legislation&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.examiner.com/x-40065-Blogosphere-Buzz-Examiner~y2010m6d16-Obama-seeks-internet-control-with-US-Senate-bill" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-06-15:/commentary/8511464</id>
    <updated>2010-06-15T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Examiner.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773 (excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/x-40065-Blogosphere-Buzz-Examiner~y2010m6d16-Obama-seeks-internet-control-with-US-Senate-bill&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Bill Proposes Office Of Cyberspace Policy</title>
    <link href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/government/security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=225600464" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-06-13:/commentary/8500111</id>
    <updated>2010-06-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>InformationWeek</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Previously, this power was taken out of another cybersecurity bill the Senate is considering, Cybersecurity Act of 2010, S. 773, sponsored by Sens. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/government/security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=225600464&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity Act of 2010 is Bad Medicine</title>
    <link href="http://advice.cio.com/10385/cybersecurity_act_of_2010_is_bad_medicine" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-05-15:/commentary/8356577</id>
    <updated>2010-05-15T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CIO</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Senator Rockefeller&amp;#39;s Cybersecurity Act of 2010(S.773) is deemed the most likely to get voted on by the Senate as it was just unanimously passed through the ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://advice.cio.com/10385/cybersecurity_act_of_2010_is_bad_medicine&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.govinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=2479" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-04-28:/commentary/8209499</id>
    <updated>2010-04-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>SearchSecurity.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 To be sure, the new draft of the Cybersecurity Act of 2010 (S. 773) is an improvement over last year&amp;#39;s version, which included an infamous &amp;quot;kill switch&amp;quot; ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=2479&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Importance Of A System Restore Point</title>
    <link href="http://thebulletin.us/articles/2010/04/09/business/doc4bbf4bdeedc25020356248.txt" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-04-08:/commentary/8064772</id>
    <updated>2010-04-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Philadelphia Bulletin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Cybersecurity Act (S.773. At least, this one has a number, that&amp;#39;s progress? What&amp;#39;s this? Remember Howard Schmidt, the president&amp;#39;s Cyber-security czar? ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thebulletin.us/articles/2010/04/09/business/doc4bbf4bdeedc25020356248.txt&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Legislative outlook</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=c0caa1dc-3236-4eef-91b8-619e0fc25980" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-31:/commentary/7997545</id>
    <updated>2010-03-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On March 25, 2010, the Senate Commerce Committee approved S. 773, the Cybersecurity Act of 2009, which was introduced jointly by Senators Jay Rockefeller, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=c0caa1dc-3236-4eef-91b8-619e0fc25980&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Commerce Committee Approves Cybersecurity Act</title>
    <link href="http://acquisition.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=1025677" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-24:/commentary/7994704</id>
    <updated>2010-03-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Broadcast Newsroom (press release) (subscription)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Senate Commerce Committee Wednesday voted to approve the Cybersecurity Act (S. 773), which would take steps to modernize and coordinate ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://acquisition.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=1025677&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=9058" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-24:/commentary/7965923</id>
    <updated>2010-03-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>E-Commerce Times</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 That bill, S. 773, was approved Wednesday morning during a Commerce, Science &amp;amp; Transportation Committee hearing. &amp;quot;We absolutely do need a renewed and ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=9058&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.rttnews.com/Content/PoliticalNews.aspx?Node=B1&amp;amp;Id=1248908" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-24:/commentary/7950528</id>
    <updated>2010-03-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>E-Commerce Times</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 That bill, S. 773, was approved Wednesday morning during a Commerce, Science &amp;amp; Transportation Committee hearing. &amp;quot;We absolutely do need a renewed and ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rttnews.com/Content/PoliticalNews.aspx?Node=B1&amp;amp;Id=1248908&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity bill passes first hurdle</title>
    <link href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/032410-cybersecurity-bill-passes-first.html?fsrc=netflash-rss" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-24:/commentary/7943868</id>
    <updated>2010-03-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NetworkWorld</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...by Senators Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine). The proposed legislation is called the Cybersecurity Act (S.773) and is a revised version of a bill that was originally introduced by the two Senators last year. It seeks to improve nati&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/032410-cybersecurity-bill-passes-first.html?fsrc=netflash-rss&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Commerce Committee Approves Cybersecurity Act</title>
    <link href="http://production.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=1025677" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-23:/commentary/7994705</id>
    <updated>2010-03-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Broadcast Newsroom</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Senate Commerce Committee Wednesday voted to approve the Cybersecurity Act (S. 773), which would take steps to modernize and coordinate ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://production.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=1025677&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity bill passes first hurdle</title>
    <link href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/032410-cybersecurity-bill-passes-first.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-23:/commentary/7951097</id>
    <updated>2010-03-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NetworkWorld</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...by Senators Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine). The proposed legislation is called the Cybersecurity Act (S.773) and is a revised version of a bill that was originally introduced by the two Senators last year. It seeks to improve nati&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/032410-cybersecurity-bill-passes-first.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://topnews.us/content/214291-senate-commerce-committee-approves-cybersecurity-bill" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-23:/commentary/7941372</id>
    <updated>2010-03-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Computerworld</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The proposed legislation is called the Cybersecurity Act (S.773) and is a revised version of a bill that was originally introduced by the two Senators last ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://topnews.us/content/214291-senate-commerce-committee-approves-cybersecurity-bill&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity bill passes first hurdle</title>
    <link href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9174065/Cybersecurity_bill_passes_first_hurdle?source=rss_news" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-23:/commentary/7939172</id>
    <updated>2010-03-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ComputerWorld</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...by Senators Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine). The proposed legislation is called the Cybersecurity Act (S.773) and is a revised version of a bill that was originally introduced by the two Senators last year.  It seeks to improve nat&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9174065/Cybersecurity_bill_passes_first_hurdle?source=rss_news&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity bill passes first hurdle</title>
    <link href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9174065/Cybersecurity_bill_passes_first_hurdle?source=rss_security" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-23:/commentary/7939171</id>
    <updated>2010-03-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ComputerWorld</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...by Senators Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine). The proposed legislation is called the Cybersecurity Act (S.773) and is a revised version of a bill that was originally introduced by the two Senators last year.  It seeks to improve nat&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9174065/Cybersecurity_bill_passes_first_hurdle?source=rss_security&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://news.malaysia.msn.com/sci-tech/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3982690" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-22:/commentary/7994701</id>
    <updated>2010-03-22T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>GovInfoSecurity.com (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The legislation, S. 773, comes up for a vote Wednesday before the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, and if approved, would become the ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.malaysia.msn.com/sci-tech/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3982690&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://news.ph.msn.com/sci-tech/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3982689" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-22:/commentary/7965921</id>
    <updated>2010-03-22T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>GovInfoSecurity.com (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The legislation, S. 773, comes up for a vote Wednesday before the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, and if approved, would become the ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.ph.msn.com/sci-tech/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3982689&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/03/presidents-veto-power-over-internet-removed-in-amended-bill.ars" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-21:/commentary/7913853</id>
    <updated>2010-03-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Ars Technica</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In the modified version of the bill, which is now the Cybersecurity Act of 2010, S. 773, the president will work with government agencies and the private ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/03/presidents-veto-power-over-internet-removed-in-amended-bill.ars&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Data security bills pass House of Representatives; Senate future uncertain</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a64c9fe2-f352-4c3d-82e0-d46a156a680f" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-18:/commentary/7994706</id>
    <updated>2010-03-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 ... Act of 2009 introduced in April of last year by Senate Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), but that bill (S. 773) has not moved out of committee. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a64c9fe2-f352-4c3d-82e0-d46a156a680f&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.dailytech.com/Senate+Introduces+Cybersecurity+Bill/article17916.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-18:/commentary/7965922</id>
    <updated>2010-03-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ComputerWeekly.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The latest version of the US Cybersecurity Act, S. 773, does not give the president the unilateral power to disconnect networks from the internet in a major ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailytech.com/Senate+Introduces+Cybersecurity+Bill/article17916.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62H2L620100318" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-18:/commentary/7912606</id>
    <updated>2010-03-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ComputerWeekly.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The latest version of the US Cybersecurity Act, S. 773, does not give the president the unilateral power to disconnect networks from the internet in a major ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62H2L620100318&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity Bill Trims President&amp;#39;s Power</title>
    <link href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/cybercrime/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=224000085" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-17:/commentary/7994702</id>
    <updated>2010-03-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>InformationWeek</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Cybersecurity Act, S. 773, co-sponsored by Senators Jay Rockefeller (DW.Va.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), is aimed at protecting critical US network ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/cybercrime/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=224000085&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Russia and China on US human rights pot calling kettles black report</title>
    <link href="http://www.examiner.com/x-10438-Human-Rights-Examiner~y2010m3d14-Russia-and-China-on-US-human-rights-pot-calling-kettles-black-report" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-13:/commentary/7994703</id>
    <updated>2010-03-13T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Examiner.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Cybersecurity Act of 2009 introduced by Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Olympia Snowe (R-ME) in the United States Senate (S.773) passed in House almost ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/x-10438-Human-Rights-Examiner~y2010m3d14-Russia-and-China-on-US-human-rights-pot-calling-kettles-black-report&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&amp;amp;aid=17433" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-02-04:/commentary/7508851</id>
    <updated>2010-02-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Center for Research on Globalization</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Shortly after Obama took office last year, Senator Jay Rockefeller introduced a Senate bill (S.773) that would give the president the power to &amp;quot;declare a ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&amp;amp;aid=17433&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Rising Tide of Internet Censorship</title>
    <link href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&amp;amp;code=COR20100205&amp;amp;articleId=17433" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-02-04:/commentary/7501044</id>
    <updated>2010-02-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Global Research</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...&quot;voluntary action is not enough.&quot; Shortly after Obama took office last year, Senator Jay Rockefeller introduced a Senate bill (S.773) that would give the president the power to &quot;declare a cybersecurity emergency&quot; and&#160;shut down the Internet. The bill wo&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&amp;amp;code=COR20100205&amp;amp;articleId=17433&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="javascript:void(0);" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-02-03:/commentary/7495872</id>
    <updated>2010-02-03T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 ... said that he intends to focus more keenly on cybersecurity and that his panel will soon mark up S. 773, the cybersecurity bill he introduced with Sen. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;javascript:void(0);&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How Cyber War is Heating Up</title>
    <link href="http://hplusmagazine.com/articles/politics/how-cyber-war-heating" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-01-25:/commentary/7477805</id>
    <updated>2010-01-25T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>h+ Magazine</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...This video provides an overview of cyber warfare, characterizing it as perhaps the #1 threat to the U.S.: The bi-partisan S.773: Cybersecurity Act of 2009 was introduced by Senators Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Olympia Snowe (R-ME) and referred to committ&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hplusmagazine.com/articles/politics/how-cyber-war-heating&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Internet Freedom Targeted</title>
    <link href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/tech-mainmenu-30/environment/2689-internet-freedom-targeted" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-01-03:/commentary/7150811</id>
    <updated>2010-01-03T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The New American</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 One can get an idea of the totalitarian intent of these backers of S. 773 by simply reading the bill, especially its Section 18, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/tech-mainmenu-30/environment/2689-internet-freedom-targeted&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lawmakers, Officials Applaud Cyber Appointment</title>
    <link href="http://www.hstoday.us/content/view/11569/128/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-22:/commentary/7028665</id>
    <updated>2009-12-22T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>HSToday</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Rockefeller and Snowe introduced the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S. 773) on April 1 to create a Cabinet-level national cybersecurity advisor, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hstoday.us/content/view/11569/128/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Miguel Diocuore : From August 2009: Bill would give president emergency control of Internet</title>
    <link href="http://diocuore.blogtownhall.com/2009/12/19/from_august_2009_bill_would_give_president_emergency_control_of_internet.thtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-18:/commentary/6984287</id>
    <updated>2009-12-18T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Town Hall</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...a West Virginia Democrat, have spent months drafting behind closed doors. CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773 (excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a s&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://diocuore.blogtownhall.com/2009/12/19/from_august_2009_bill_would_give_president_emergency_control_of_internet.thtml&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=793030" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-02:/commentary/6903983</id>
    <updated>2009-12-02T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>OneNewsNow</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 It was in early April when Senator John Rockefeller (D-West Virginia) introduced the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S. 773) on the Senate floor. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=793030&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New policies could cut Web freedoms</title>
    <link href="http://www.alligator.org/opinion/columns/article_596eb830-cf40-11de-90f2-001cc4c03286.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-11-10:/commentary/6667351</id>
    <updated>2009-11-10T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Independent Florida Alligator</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Under the traditional American power grab of protecting the &#8220;free flow of commerce,&#8221; S.773 wants to give the president total power to completely shut down ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alligator.org/opinion/columns/article_596eb830-cf40-11de-90f2-001cc4c03286.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Preserve Internet Freedom -- Beware Obama&amp;#39;s Net Neutrality</title>
    <link href="http://www.jbs.org/privacy-internet-freedom-blog/5525-preserve-internet-freedom-beware-obamas-net-neutrality" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-10-20:/commentary/6479121</id>
    <updated>2009-10-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>John Birch Society</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Nonetheless, just in case the American public doesn&amp;#39;t acquiesce to strict government control of the Internet, there&amp;#39;s a bill in Congress (S. 773), ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jbs.org/privacy-internet-freedom-blog/5525-preserve-internet-freedom-beware-obamas-net-neutrality&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity - A Dark Horse in the National Race for Resources</title>
    <link href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sarah-granger/cybersecurity---a-dark-ho_b_328125.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-10-19:/commentary/6479122</id>
    <updated>2009-10-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Huffington Post (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Take, for instance, S. 773: Cybersecurity Act of 2009. It begins with countless examples of how critical cybersecurity is in securing our infrastructure. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sarah-granger/cybersecurity---a-dark-ho_b_328125.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.examiner.com/x-26122-Cheyenne-State-Rights-Examiner~y2009m10d12-Cybersecurity-Act-and-unintended-consequences" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-10-11:/commentary/6369351</id>
    <updated>2009-10-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Examiner.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... in front of the senate they are the United States Information and Communications Act (S. 921), or US ICE, and the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S. 773). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/x-26122-Cheyenne-State-Rights-Examiner~y2009m10d12-Cybersecurity-Act-and-unintended-consequences&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Compromise Cybersecurity Bill Sought</title>
    <link href="http://blogs.govinfosecurity.com/posts.php?postID=323" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-10-08:/commentary/6341549</id>
    <updated>2009-10-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>GovInfoSecurity.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The two bills are the United States Information and Communications Act S. 921), or US ICE, and the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S. 773). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.govinfosecurity.com/posts.php?postID=323&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rockefeller and Snowe Continue Fighting for Public-Private Teamwork to Ensure ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.webnewswire.com/node/468087" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-10-01:/commentary/6394271</id>
    <updated>2009-10-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Webnewswire.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... earlier this year, introduced their own bipartisan landmark cybersecurity legislation ( S. 773, The Cybersecurity Act of 2009 and S. 778, the National ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webnewswire.com/node/468087&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Security Expert Warns That Hackers Could Destroy U.S. Money Supply</title>
    <link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheTalkRadioNewsService/~3/sRk-UkblJLY/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-10-01:/commentary/6264666</id>
    <updated>2009-10-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Talk Radio News Service</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...weak U.S. defense toward hacking are &#8220;a big problem.&#8221; Controls such as Sen. John Rockefeller&#8217;s (D-W.V.) proposed cyber security bill S.773 has drawn some support, but many people believe the level of internet access as granted by the President is &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheTalkRadioNewsService/~3/sRk-UkblJLY/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rockefeller and Snowe Continue Fighting for Public-Private ...</title>
    <link href="http://media-newswire.com/release_1101204.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-10-01:/commentary/6264665</id>
    <updated>2009-10-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Media Newswire (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... earlier this year, introduced their own bipartisan landmark cybersecurity legislation ( S. 773, The Cybersecurity Act of 2009 and S. 778, the National ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://media-newswire.com/release_1101204.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Secret Service Investigates Facebook Poll on Obama Assassination</title>
    <link href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/09/29/secret-service-investigates-facebook-poll-on-obama-assassination/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-28:/commentary/6242600</id>
    <updated>2009-09-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Politics Daily (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... under a Senate bill that put civil libertarians on edge earlier this year is still in the works: CNET obtained a copy of the current revision of S.773, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/09/29/secret-service-investigates-facebook-poll-on-obama-assassination/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/279765" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-26:/commentary/6219463</id>
    <updated>2009-09-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DigitalJournal.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
At the same time, there is a new bill being drafted behind closed doors in the Senate, S.773 (excerpt) which would give the White House the authority to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/279765&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>America Talks: Will Obama Silence The Opposition?</title>
    <link href="http://americatalks.blogtownhall.com/2009/09/27/will_obama_silence_the_opposition.thtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-26:/commentary/6218849</id>
    <updated>2009-09-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Town Hall</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...having to equalize all points of view. At the same time, there is a new bill being drafted behind closed doors in the Senate, S.773 (excerpt) which would give the White House the authority to seize control of private-sector networks during a so-called c&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://americatalks.blogtownhall.com/2009/09/27/will_obama_silence_the_opposition.thtml&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Podr&#195;&#173;a Obama tener el poder de &#226;&#8364;&#339;desconectar&#226;&#8364;* internet</title>
    <link href="http://www.akronoticias.com/2009/09/9926podria-obama-tener-el-poder.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-25:/commentary/6215634</id>
    <updated>2009-09-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Akro Noticias</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CNET reporta que ha visto la ley S. 773 en su nueva redacci&#195;&#179;n y que b&#195;&#161;sicamente dice lo mismo modulando el lenguaje: el presidente puede tomar control del ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.akronoticias.com/2009/09/9926podria-obama-tener-el-poder.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Obama chooses to ignore the First Amendment</title>
    <link href="http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090926/OPINION/909260307/-1/NEWSMAP" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-25:/commentary/6209942</id>
    <updated>2009-09-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Seacoastonline.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Finally, we have the proposed S.773 &#226;&#8364;&#8221; cosponsored by Maine&amp;#39;s own &amp;quot;beloved&amp;quot; Sen. Olympia Snowe &#226;&#8364;&#8221; which would give Obama unilateral power to disconnect ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090926/OPINION/909260307/-1/NEWSMAP&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Presidential Internet Kill Switch May Still Be Alive</title>
    <link href="http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14992" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-21:/commentary/6184246</id>
    <updated>2009-09-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Canada Free Press</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
For a bill that has yet to have a public hearing, much less faced a single vote, the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S. 773) remains the most controversial ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14992&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Presidential Internet Kill Switch May Still Be Alive</title>
    <link href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Presidential-Internet-Kill-Switch-May-Still-Be-Alive-577445/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-19:/commentary/6168460</id>
    <updated>2009-09-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>eWeek</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
For a bill that has yet to have a public hearing, much less faced a single vote, the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S. 773) remains the most controversial ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Presidential-Internet-Kill-Switch-May-Still-Be-Alive-577445/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.examiner.com/x-2684-Law-Enforcement-Examiner~y2009m9d16-White-House-spying-on-social-networking-web-sites" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-16:/commentary/6150664</id>
    <updated>2009-09-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The New American</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The act consists of two Senate bills (S. 773 and S. 778), and would make the Cybersecurity Adviser directly responsible to the President for managing ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/x-2684-Law-Enforcement-Examiner~y2009m9d16-White-House-spying-on-social-networking-web-sites&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Coming Cyberczar to Regulate Internet</title>
    <link href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/tech-mainmenu-30/computers/1911-coming-cyberczar-to-regulate-internet" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-16:/commentary/6139484</id>
    <updated>2009-09-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The New American</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The act consists of two Senate bills (S. 773 and S. 778), and would make the Cybersecurity Adviser directly responsible to the President for managing ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/tech-mainmenu-30/computers/1911-coming-cyberczar-to-regulate-internet&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Opinion is a responsibility</title>
    <link href="http://www.gjfreepress.com/article/20090914/LETTERS/909139985/1020/NONE" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-13:/commentary/6106653</id>
    <updated>2009-09-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Grand Junction Free Press</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I would encourage everyone to check out the FCC&amp;#39;s Web site at http://www.fcc.gov/, and also read Senate Bill S.773. The diversity of ownership has been ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gjfreepress.com/article/20090914/LETTERS/909139985/1020/NONE&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Federal IT strategy, hope over reality</title>
    <link href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9137638/Federal_IT_strategy_hope_over_reality?source=rss_security" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-06:/commentary/6045489</id>
    <updated>2009-09-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ComputerWorld</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...a triumph of hope over reality and, for so many reasons, a very bad idea. A new version of the draft, now elevated to be bill S.773, the &quot;Cybersecurity Act of 2009&quot;, reappeared Aug. 19 and the changes compound the poor thinking of the original with furt&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9137638/Federal_IT_strategy_hope_over_reality?source=rss_security&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.voceditalia.it/articolo.asp?id=37986&amp;amp;titolo=La%20sicurezza%20della%20Rete%20un%20difficile%20nodo%20da%20sciogliere%20per%20l'amministrazione%20Obama" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-06:/commentary/6045117</id>
    <updated>2009-09-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>La Voce d&amp;#39;Italia</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... sulla proposta di legge S. 773, presentata dal senatore democratico della West Virginia John Davidson Rockefeller (pronipote del magnate del petrolio), ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.voceditalia.it/articolo.asp?id=37986&amp;amp;titolo=La%20sicurezza%20della%20Rete%20un%20difficile%20nodo%20da%20sciogliere%20per%20l&amp;#x27;amministrazione%20Obama&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Federal IT strategy, hope over reality</title>
    <link href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9137638/Federal_IT_strategy_hope_over_reality?taxonomyId=1" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-06:/commentary/6045115</id>
    <updated>2009-09-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Computerworld</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A new version of the draft, now elevated to be bill S.773, the &amp;quot;Cybersecurity Act of 2009&amp;quot;, reappeared Aug. 19 and the changes compound the poor thinking of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9137638/Federal_IT_strategy_hope_over_reality?taxonomyId=1&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Euripides' Self Evident Truths: The Snarky Files - Euripides' Views on the Week (September 4)</title>
    <link href="http://euripides.blogtownhall.com/2009/09/04/the_snarky_files_-_euripides_views_on_the_week_september_4.thtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-04:/commentary/6246629</id>
    <updated>2009-09-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Town Hall</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...to disconnect private-sector computers from the Internet.... CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page [revised] draft of S.773, which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a so-called cybe&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://euripides.blogtownhall.com/2009/09/04/the_snarky_files_-_euripides_views_on_the_week_september_4.thtml&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What Do &#226;&#8364;&#339;Cybersecurity Emergency&#226;&#8364;* Powers Mean For The Internet?</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/Examiner-Opinion-Zone/What-Do-Cybersecurity-Emergency-Powers-Mean-For-The-Internet-57573272.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-04:/commentary/6035200</id>
    <updated>2009-09-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Washington Examiner</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In an opinon essay on CBSNews.com, writer Bruce Henderson observed that S. 773 &#226;&#8364;&#339;has unleashed a flood of criticism on how [the bill] would give the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/Examiner-Opinion-Zone/What-Do-Cybersecurity-Emergency-Powers-Mean-For-The-Internet-57573272.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.examiner.com/x-15079-Long-Island-Business-Technology-Examiner~y2009m9d3-FISMA-Gets-Teeth--S773-and-S778-The-Cybersecurity-Act-of-2009" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-02:/commentary/6242599</id>
    <updated>2009-09-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Examiner.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.773 is currently a draft bill. Good news. S.773 is only 55 pages so many members of Congress may read it. Here is the senate&amp;#39;s summary of S.773 &#226;&#8364;&#339;A bill to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/x-15079-Long-Island-Business-Technology-Examiner~y2009m9d3-FISMA-Gets-Teeth--S773-and-S778-The-Cybersecurity-Act-of-2009&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.libertariansolution.com/advocates/100/united-states-government-prepares-to-control-the-internet-via-senate-bill-773" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-02:/commentary/6232898</id>
    <updated>2009-09-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Libertarian Solution</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It seems that under S.773 that only government sanctioned speech will be allowed during an emergency. Rights will yield to expediency much like the famous ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.libertariansolution.com/advocates/100/united-states-government-prepares-to-control-the-internet-via-senate-bill-773&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.examiner.com/x-1449-Dallas-Libertarian-Examiner~y2009m9d3-All-Hail-the-Internet-Czar" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-02:/commentary/6015365</id>
    <updated>2009-09-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Examiner.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.773 is currently a draft bill. Good news. S.773 is only 55 pages so many members of Congress may read it. Here is the senate&amp;#39;s summary of S.773 &#226;&#8364;&#339;A bill to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/x-1449-Dallas-Libertarian-Examiner~y2009m9d3-All-Hail-the-Internet-Czar&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New bill gives US president emergency powers over the Internet</title>
    <link href="http://www.neoseeker.com/news/11694-new-bill-gives-u-s-president-emergency-powers-over-the-internet/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-02:/commentary/6015324</id>
    <updated>2009-09-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Neoseeker</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Bill S.773 would grant the president authority to disconnect any privately-owned network from the Internet, at the president&amp;#39;s discretion. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.neoseeker.com/news/11694-new-bill-gives-u-s-president-emergency-powers-over-the-internet/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.examiner.com/x-2684-Law-Enforcement-Examiner~y2009m9d3-Cyber-attack-The-Internet-power-grab-by-the-Obama-White-House" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-02:/commentary/6015323</id>
    <updated>2009-09-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Examiner.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.773 is currently a draft bill. Good news. S.773 is only 55 pages so many members of Congress may read it. Here is the senate&amp;#39;s summary of S.773 &#226;&#8364;&#339;A bill to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/x-2684-Law-Enforcement-Examiner~y2009m9d3-Cyber-attack-The-Internet-power-grab-by-the-Obama-White-House&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What&amp;#39;s really wrong with the Cybersecurity bill?</title>
    <link href="http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14348" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-01:/commentary/6184247</id>
    <updated>2009-09-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Canada Free Press</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A lot of attention has been paid in the last few days to US Senate bill S.773 that would give the president ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14348&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.examiner.com/x-21184-Homeland-Security-Examiner~y2009m9d2-Senate-Bill-773--Cyber-Security-or-Cyber-Control" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-01:/commentary/6004913</id>
    <updated>2009-09-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Examiner.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill, identified in the Senate as S. 773, relates to Cyber-Security for the United States Government. Its intent is to allow for the creation of a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/x-21184-Homeland-Security-Examiner~y2009m9d2-Senate-Bill-773--Cyber-Security-or-Cyber-Control&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/01/al-gore-didn%E2%80%99t-invent-the-internet-and-obama-can%E2%80%99t-control-it/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-01:/commentary/6004868</id>
    <updated>2009-09-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Canada Free Press</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A lot of attention has been paid in the last few days to US Senate bill S.773 that would give the president ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/01/al-gore-didn%E2%80%99t-invent-the-internet-and-obama-can%E2%80%99t-control-it/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Letters: Protect our Internet freedom</title>
    <link href="http://www.benningtonbanner.com/opinion/ci_13249233?source=rss" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-01:/commentary/5998591</id>
    <updated>2009-09-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bennington Banner</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...people? And does the &quot;certified service provider&quot; extend to services like Gmail and Hotmail? The U.S. Senate&#8217;s Cybersecurity Act, S.773, as written, allows the president to seize control of private sector computer networks during a cybersecurity emerg&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.benningtonbanner.com/opinion/ci_13249233?source=rss&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Obama administration seeks &amp;quot;Emergency Control&amp;quot; of the Internet</title>
    <link href="http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Article_56830.shtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-31:/commentary/6219477</id>
    <updated>2009-08-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Axis of Logic</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S.773) wends its way through Congress, civil liberties&amp;#39; advocates are decrying provisions that would hand the President ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Article_56830.shtml&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Letters: Protect our Internet freedom</title>
    <link href="http://www.benningtonbanner.com/opinion/ci_13249233" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-31:/commentary/5998590</id>
    <updated>2009-08-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bennington Banner</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The US Senate&amp;#39;s Cybersecurity Act, S.773, as written, allows the president to seize control of private sector computer networks during a cybersecurity ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.benningtonbanner.com/opinion/ci_13249233&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rockefeller: Who Me? I Don&amp;#39;t Want to Shutter the Net</title>
    <link href="http://blogs.govinfosecurity.com/posts.php?postID=293" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-31:/commentary/5998589</id>
    <updated>2009-08-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>GovInfoSecurity.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Olympia Snowe, R.-Maine, aimed at securing federal IT systems and the nation&amp;#39;s critical IT infrastructure, denies his legislation - S. 773 - would allow the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.govinfosecurity.com/posts.php?postID=293&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Taking Liberties</title>
    <link href="http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/taking_liberties/main504383.shtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-31:/commentary/5996798</id>
    <updated>2009-08-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CBS News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The response to my article on Friday about the revised S.773 bill (handing the president additional authority over the Internet during emergencies) was ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/taking_liberties/main504383.shtml&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.773 Allows Temporary Government Takeover of the Internet</title>
    <link href="http://4g-wirelessevolution.tmcnet.com/broadband-stimulus/topics/broadband-stimulus/articles/63376-s773-allows-temporary-government-takeover-the-internet.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-31:/commentary/5996797</id>
    <updated>2009-08-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>TMCnet</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The latest draft of a proposed Senate bill S.773, the &amp;quot;Cybersecurity Act of 2009&amp;quot; will allow the president to temporarily ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://4g-wirelessevolution.tmcnet.com/broadband-stimulus/topics/broadband-stimulus/articles/63376-s773-allows-temporary-government-takeover-the-internet.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Expanding cybersecurity powers for president provokes debate</title>
    <link href="http://fcw.com/articles/2009/09/01/cybersecurity-bill-debate.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-31:/commentary/5996760</id>
    <updated>2009-08-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Federal Computer Week | FCW</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...Strategy, Addicott said. The most recent National Security Strategy was published in 2006.  Addicott said the&#160;bill -- S.773 -- probably included the language to more clearly define how government officials expect to react to a potential threat, Addicot&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://fcw.com/articles/2009/09/01/cybersecurity-bill-debate.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill would give president emergency control of Internet</title>
    <link href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&amp;amp;code=MCC20090831&amp;amp;articleId=14981" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-30:/commentary/6242601</id>
    <updated>2009-08-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Global Research</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...a West Virginia Democrat, have spent months drafting behind closed doors. CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773, which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a so-called c&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&amp;amp;code=MCC20090831&amp;amp;articleId=14981&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Controversial new Internet powers for Obama</title>
    <link href="http://www.netguide.co.nz/200909011141/controversial-new-internet-powers-for-obama.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-30:/commentary/6219464</id>
    <updated>2009-08-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NetGuide</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The proposal (Cybersecurity bill S. 773) is a reviewed draft produced by Democrat Senator Jay Rockefeller. The original bill created a storm of criticism, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.netguide.co.nz/200909011141/controversial-new-internet-powers-for-obama.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RedState&amp;#39;s Morning Briefing for Monday, August 31, 2009</title>
    <link href="http://www.examiner.com/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner~y2009m8d31-RedStates-Morning-Briefing-for-Monday-August-31-2009" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-30:/commentary/6103675</id>
    <updated>2009-08-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Examiner.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 773, a bill by West Virginia Sen. Jay Rockefeller, Democrat, has a 55-page draft bill that would create new &#226;&#8364;&#339;emergency&#226;&#8364;* powers for the President, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner~y2009m8d31-RedStates-Morning-Briefing-for-Monday-August-31-2009&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>La Casa Bianca vuole controllare Internet?</title>
    <link href="http://punto-informatico.it/2700077/PI/News/casa-bianca-vuole-controllare-internet.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-30:/commentary/5985574</id>
    <updated>2009-08-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Punto Informatico</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
O perlomeno questa &#195;&#168; l&amp;#39;interpretazione pi&#195;&#185; chiacchierata sugli Intertubi riguardo la proposta di legge S. 773, presentata dal senatore democratico John ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://punto-informatico.it/2700077/PI/News/casa-bianca-vuole-controllare-internet.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Morning Briefing for August 31, 2009</title>
    <link href="http://www.redstate.com/blog/2009/08/31/morning-briefing-for-august-31-2009/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-30:/commentary/5985573</id>
    <updated>2009-08-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>RedState</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 773, a bill by West Virginia Sen. Jay Rockefeller, Democrat, has a 55-page draft bill that would create new &#226;&#8364;&#339;emergency&#226;&#8364;* powers for the President, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/blog/2009/08/31/morning-briefing-for-august-31-2009/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.examiner.com/x-8951-Myrtle-Beach-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m8d31-Culture-Watch-Volume-82" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-30:/commentary/5985572</id>
    <updated>2009-08-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Examiner.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CNET has obtained a copy of the draft of S.773 (excerpt), which appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/x-8951-Myrtle-Beach-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m8d31-Culture-Watch-Volume-82&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.examiner.com/x-17412-Macon-County-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m8d31-Democrats-to-give-Obama-emergency-powers-over-Internet-traffic" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-30:/commentary/5985571</id>
    <updated>2009-08-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Examiner.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773 (excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/x-17412-Macon-County-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m8d31-Democrats-to-give-Obama-emergency-powers-over-Internet-traffic&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>President Obama&amp;#39;s Radical Advisers Are Fighting for Revolution</title>
    <link href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,545040,00.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-30:/commentary/5985570</id>
    <updated>2009-08-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>FOXNews</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Like this one: On Friday, Drudge had the story of the 55-page bill proposed by Senator Jay Rockefeller (S.773) that would allow the president to seize ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,545040,00.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Americans continue plans to switch off the Internet</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.theinquirer.net/c/554/f/7127/s/5e929e4/l/0L0Stheinquirer0Bnet0Cinquirer0Cnews0C15318790Camericans0Econtinue0Eplans0Eswitch0Einternet/story01.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-30:/commentary/5984409</id>
    <updated>2009-08-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Inquirer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...now a revised version has been drawn up by Senator Jay Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat. CNET got a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773, which still appears to permit the executive branch to seize temporary control of private sector networks. Appare&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.theinquirer.net/c/554/f/7127/s/5e929e4/l/0L0Stheinquirer0Bnet0Cinquirer0Cnews0C15318790Camericans0Econtinue0Eplans0Eswitch0Einternet/story01.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&amp;quot;Taking Liberties&amp;quot; On Hiatus At Burning Man This Week</title>
    <link href="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/08/31/taking_liberties/entry5275680.shtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-30:/commentary/5983765</id>
    <updated>2009-08-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CBS News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The response to my article on Friday about the revised S.773 bill (handing the president additional authority over the Internet during emergencies) was ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/08/31/taking_liberties/entry5275680.shtml&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill would give US president emergency control of Internet</title>
    <link href="http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/internet/0,39044908,62057317,00.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-29:/commentary/6004869</id>
    <updated>2009-08-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ZDNet Asia</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
ZDNet Asia&amp;#39;s sister site CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773, which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/internet/0,39044908,62057317,00.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Bill 773 &#226;&#8364;&#8220; Men in Black Come Knocking</title>
    <link href="http://www.thewhir.com/blog/Tom_Millitzer/083009_Senate_Bill_773_Men_in_Black_Come_Knocking" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-29:/commentary/5983717</id>
    <updated>2009-08-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Web Host Industry Review</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Tonight between James Bond and Men in Black, I read the 55 heartwarming pages of Senate Bill S.773 the Cybersecurity Act of 2009. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thewhir.com/blog/Tom_Millitzer/083009_Senate_Bill_773_Men_in_Black_Come_Knocking&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Undernews For August 30, 2009</title>
    <link href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0908/S00263.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-29:/commentary/5982888</id>
    <updated>2009-08-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Scoop.co.nz</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773, which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0908/S00263.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Some day Obama&amp;#39;s term in office will end; what if&#226;&#8364;&#166;.?</title>
    <link href="http://mindyourowndamnbusinesspolitics.com/wordpress/2009/08/30/some-day-obama%E2%80%99s-term-in-office-will-end-what-if/comment-page-1/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-29:/commentary/5982852</id>
    <updated>2009-08-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mind Your Own Damn Business Politics</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.773 will grant President Obama and the White House yet increased power in addition to the increases he has gained by seizing control of parts of the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mindyourowndamnbusinesspolitics.com/wordpress/2009/08/30/some-day-obama%E2%80%99s-term-in-office-will-end-what-if/comment-page-1/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>President Cybersecurity Emergency Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.rantrave.com/Rant/President-Cybersecurity-Emergency-Bill.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-28:/commentary/6004870</id>
    <updated>2009-08-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>RantRave | Published Opinion.</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Ask them what their position on Bill S.773 - Cybersecurity Act of 2009 is. 5. State what your position on the bill is. 6. Explain why your against the Bill. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rantrave.com/Rant/President-Cybersecurity-Emergency-Bill.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/01/unknowable-emergencies-drive-cybersecurity-planners-wargame-responses?test=latestnews" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-28:/commentary/5996796</id>
    <updated>2009-08-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Computerworld</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 773, a bill whose stated goal is &#226;&#8364;&#339;to ensure the continued free flow of commerce within the United States and with its global trading partners through ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/01/unknowable-emergencies-drive-cybersecurity-planners-wargame-responses?test=latestnews&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.gambling911.com/politics/obama-take-control-internet-082909.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-28:/commentary/5978206</id>
    <updated>2009-08-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Computerworld</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 773, a bill whose stated goal is &#226;&#8364;&#339;to ensure the continued free flow of commerce within the United States and with its global trading partners through ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gambling911.com/politics/obama-take-control-internet-082909.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.fayerwayer.com/2009/08/un-proyecto-de-ley-en-estados-unidos-le-daria-a-obama-el-control-de-internet/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-28:/commentary/5975664</id>
    <updated>2009-08-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>FayerWayer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CNet obtuvo una copia de una p&#195;&#161;gina de dicho proyecto (55, S.773) revisado por el senador Rockefeller que a&#195;&#186;n considera otorgar al presidente el control ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fayerwayer.com/2009/08/un-proyecto-de-ley-en-estados-unidos-le-daria-a-obama-el-control-de-internet/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Democrats echo Truman and threaten to nationalize Internet</title>
    <link href="http://www.redstate.com/blog/2009/08/29/democrats-echo-truman-and-threaten-to-nationalize-internet/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-28:/commentary/5975663</id>
    <updated>2009-08-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>RedState</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 773, a bill by West Virginia Sen. Jay Rockefeller, Democrat, has a 55-page draft bill that would create new &#226;&#8364;&#339;emergency&#226;&#8364;* powers for the President, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/blog/2009/08/29/democrats-echo-truman-and-threaten-to-nationalize-internet/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.examiner.com/x-8817-Pittsburgh-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m8d29-Government-Control-of-the-internet--promises-suspension-for-any-reason-deemed-necessary" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-28:/commentary/5975662</id>
    <updated>2009-08-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Computerworld</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 773, a bill whose stated goal is &#226;&#8364;&#339;to ensure the continued free flow of commerce within the United States and with its global trading partners through ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/x-8817-Pittsburgh-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m8d29-Government-Control-of-the-internet--promises-suspension-for-any-reason-deemed-necessary&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill would give president power to disconnect private networks</title>
    <link href="http://fcw.com/articles/2009/08/28/cybersecurity-bill-presidential-power.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-27:/commentary/5962916</id>
    <updated>2009-08-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>FCW.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bill, S. 773, was introduced by Sen. Jay Rockefeller (DW.Va.). The measure was referred to the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee in ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://fcw.com/articles/2009/08/28/cybersecurity-bill-presidential-power.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10320096-38.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-27:/commentary/5962915</id>
    <updated>2009-08-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CNET News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773 (excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10320096-38.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18173-Utah-County-Libertarian-Examiner~y2009m8d28-Bill-would-let-the-government-control-your-internet-and-computer-networks" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-27:/commentary/5962914</id>
    <updated>2009-08-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Examiner.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A great article at cnet.com details a bill (S.773) introduced by Senator Jay Rockefeller that would allow the government to take control of your computer ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/x-18173-Utah-County-Libertarian-Examiner~y2009m8d28-Bill-would-let-the-government-control-your-internet-and-computer-networks&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2009/08/bill_would_authorize_us_government_to_control_internet_traffic_during_emergencies.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-27:/commentary/5962913</id>
    <updated>2009-08-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>I4U</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
That&amp;#39;s why US Senate bill S.773 has so many net neutrality advocates and corporations up in arms. As CNET explains the bill gives the President the power to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2009/08/bill_would_authorize_us_government_to_control_internet_traffic_during_emergencies.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>U.S. Senate bill would give Obama emergency control of Internet</title>
    <link href="http://www.macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/us_senate_bill_would_give_obama_emergency_control_of_internet/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-27:/commentary/5962875</id>
    <updated>2009-08-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>MacDailyNews</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...have spent months drafting behind closed doors,&quot; McCullagh reports. &quot;CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773, which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a so-called cybers&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/us_senate_bill_would_give_obama_emergency_control_of_internet/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Team Obama - No Internet For You</title>
    <link href="http://www.pipelinenews.org/index.cfm?page=internet8.28.09.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-27:/commentary/5962871</id>
    <updated>2009-08-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PipeLineNews.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
According to this report, Rockefeller&amp;#39;s new legislation is essentially a redraft of a previous piece of legislation authored by him [S. 773] which still ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pipelinenews.org/index.cfm?page=internet8.28.09.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.examiner.com/x-14143-Orange-County-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m8d28-Fl-Sen-Bill-Nelsoncosponsor-to-S773Turns-control-of-your-internet-over-to-the-White-House" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-27:/commentary/5962870</id>
    <updated>2009-08-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>I4U</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
That&amp;#39;s why US Senate bill S.773 has so many net neutrality advocates and corporations up in arms. As CNET explains the bill gives the President the power to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/x-14143-Orange-County-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m8d28-Fl-Sen-Bill-Nelsoncosponsor-to-S773Turns-control-of-your-internet-over-to-the-White-House&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>America can only be Right: If There's an Emergency, Let's Let the Messiah Deal with It</title>
    <link href="http://liberalslie.blogtownhall.com/2009/08/28/if_theres_an_emergency,_lets_let_the_messiah_deal_with_it.thtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-27:/commentary/5962813</id>
    <updated>2009-08-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Town Hall</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...a West Virginia Democrat, have spent months drafting behind closed doors. CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773 (excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a s&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://liberalslie.blogtownhall.com/2009/08/28/if_theres_an_emergency,_lets_let_the_messiah_deal_with_it.thtml&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Government gets &#8216;emergency&#8217; control of the internet in new Senate bill</title>
    <link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openmarketorg/~3/oqs8ECKWkjU/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-27:/commentary/5962811</id>
    <updated>2009-08-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Openmarket.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...story just hit the Drudge Report&#8217;s front page.&#160; Declan McCullagh at CNET writes today about the latest revision of S.773, a bill that would give the president &#8220;emergency control&#8221; of the internet in case of a &#8220;cybersecurity emergency.&#8221;&#160; Wayne&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openmarketorg/~3/oqs8ECKWkjU/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Vague Senate Bill Would Grant President Emergency Control of Internet</title>
    <link href="http://conservativetimes.org/?p=3671" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-27:/commentary/5962810</id>
    <updated>2009-08-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Heritage Times</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...a West Virginia Democrat, have spent months drafting behind closed doors. CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773 (excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a s&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://conservativetimes.org/?p=3671&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Gabrielle Cusumano: HUGE NEWS &quot;S.773 - Cybersecurity Act of 2009&quot;</title>
    <link href="http://gabriellecusumano.blogtownhall.com/2009/08/28/huge_news_s773_-_cybersecurity_act_of_2009.thtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-27:/commentary/5962807</id>
    <updated>2009-08-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Town Hall</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...- Cybersecurity Act of 2009&#160; CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft (excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a so-called cybersecurity emergency.&quot; &quot;The new version w&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gabriellecusumano.blogtownhall.com/2009/08/28/huge_news_s773_-_cybersecurity_act_of_2009.thtml&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity: A Briefing - Part II</title>
    <link href="http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/current.php?artType=view&amp;amp;artMonth=August&amp;amp;artYear=2009&amp;amp;EntryNo=10020" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-04:/commentary/5962872</id>
    <updated>2009-08-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Metropolitan Coporate Counsel</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Meanwhile, the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S.773), would create a Cybersecurity Advisory Panel that would advise the President and be composed of outside ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/current.php?artType=view&amp;amp;artMonth=August&amp;amp;artYear=2009&amp;amp;EntryNo=10020&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Enhancing FISMA Improves Cybersecurity, GAO Says</title>
    <link href="http://www.hstoday.us/content/view/9183/128/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-06-30:/commentary/5425519</id>
    <updated>2009-06-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>HSToday</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... in a letter to Congress Tuesday, and the House should consider taking up legislation like the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S. 773) to achieve that goal. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hstoday.us/content/view/9183/128/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Letters appearing in the Kalamazoo Gazette on June 23, 2009</title>
    <link href="http://www.mlive.com/opinion/kalamazoo/index.ssf/2009/06/letters_appearing_in_the_kalam_14.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-06-22:/commentary/5386303</id>
    <updated>2009-06-22T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kalamazoo Gazette - MLive.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
There is a new Senate bill, S.773, to protect &quot;cyber communications.&quot; In section 14, paragraph b, it says the Secretary of Commerce in sub paragraph 1, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mlive.com/opinion/kalamazoo/index.ssf/2009/06/letters_appearing_in_the_kalam_14.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Oh stop already</title>
    <link href="http://www.secuobs.com/revue/news/104296.shtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-05-30:/commentary/5149414</id>
    <updated>2009-05-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>SecuObs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Also, be sure to check out S.773 - The Cyber Security Act of 2009 - part 1 over on the sovasec blog for a detailed analysis (and skewering) of the Cyber ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.secuobs.com/revue/news/104296.shtml&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Implications of proposed Cybersecurity Act of 2009, Part 2</title>
    <link href="http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/sec/2009/051109sec2.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-05-12:/commentary/4989804</id>
    <updated>2009-05-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NetworkWorld</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...the first of this two-part series, Bill Garamella raised the issue of the &#8220;Cybersecurity Act of 2009&#8221; consisting of S.773 and S.778. Everything that follows is entirely Bill&#8217;s work with minor edits. &#8226; Society can not function without the cyber i&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/sec/2009/051109sec2.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Automation Federation Completes Successful Visit to Capitol Hill</title>
    <link href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/Automation_Federation/Workforce_Development/prweb2396934.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-05-05:/commentary/4941714</id>
    <updated>2009-05-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PR Web (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill, S. 773, is intended ''To ensure the continued free flow of commerce within the United States and with its global trading partners through secure ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prweb.com/releases/Automation_Federation/Workforce_Development/prweb2396934.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>In Our View: Hands off our Internet!</title>
    <link href="http://www.heraldextra.com/content/view/307754/3/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-05-02:/commentary/4899629</id>
    <updated>2009-05-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Herald</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The measure, S.773, the so-called Cybersecurity Act of 2009, aims to protect the nation's digital infrastructure from attack. That's also a timely concern. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heraldextra.com/content/view/307754/3/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Poll shows voters reject government intrusion into papers, radio ...</title>
    <link href="http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=96476" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-27:/commentary/5041809</id>
    <updated>2009-04-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WorldNetDaily</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Bill Nelson, D-Fla., have co-sponsored S. 773, a bill that would give the US government authority over all online networks considered part of the nation's ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=96476&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Divide &amp; Fail? Analyzing Obama's Tech Appointments</title>
    <link href="http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=733&amp;amp;doc_id=176018&amp;amp;f_src=internetevolution_sitedefault" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-27:/commentary/4911339</id>
    <updated>2009-04-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Internet Evolution</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...has ultimate responsibility for technology decisions. This leader would be affirmed by Congress, eliminating feeble attempts like S.773: Cybersecurity Act of 2009 to divert control to the Department of Commerce or elsewhere. Further, while the current C&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=733&amp;amp;doc_id=176018&amp;amp;f_src=internetevolution_sitedefault&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Poll shows voters reject government intrusion into papers, radio ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=96476" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-27:/commentary/4868560</id>
    <updated>2009-04-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WND.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Bill Nelson, D-Fla., have co-sponsored S. 773, a bill that would give the US government authority over all online networks considered part of the nation's ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=96476&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Obama threatens speech on radio, Web, print</title>
    <link href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=96277" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-26:/commentary/5029894</id>
    <updated>2009-04-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WND.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Rockefeller, Snowe and Nelson have introduced S.773 which would, critics say, give the federal government control over the Internet including, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=96277&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Obama threatens speech on radio, Web, print</title>
    <link href="http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=96277" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-26:/commentary/4858401</id>
    <updated>2009-04-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WorldNetDaily</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Rockefeller, Snowe and Nelson have introduced S.773 which would, critics say, give the federal government control over the Internet including, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=96277&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>United States: Bill Introduced To Promote Cybersecurity Of ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=78548" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-23:/commentary/4838106</id>
    <updated>2009-04-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq News Alerts (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Bill Nelson, introduced a bill (S.773) on April 1, 2009, that would greatly expand federal oversight and control over information systems and networks used ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=78548&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report Claims DNS Cache Poisoning Attack Against Brazilian Bank ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Report-Claims-DNS-Cache-Poisoning-Attack-Against-Brazilian-Bank-and-ISP-761709/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-21:/commentary/4833764</id>
    <updated>2009-04-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>eWeek</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The proposed Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (Senate bill S.773) orders the Department of Commerce to come up with a plan for implementing DNSSEC in government ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Report-Claims-DNS-Cache-Poisoning-Attack-Against-Brazilian-Bank-and-ISP-761709/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pledge Allegiance to the CONSTITUTION - Not the Flag</title>
    <link href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article6324.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-21:/commentary/4831325</id>
    <updated>2009-04-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Nolan Chart LLC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(Bills like S. 773, Rockefeller's &quot;Cybersecurity Act &quot;, intended to give the government control over the Internet and kill what's left of a free press and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nolanchart.com/article6324.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity Act unconstitutional</title>
    <link href="http://www.starexponent.com/cse/news/opinion/letters_to_the_editor/article/cybersecurity_act_unconstitutional/34233/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-21:/commentary/4831324</id>
    <updated>2009-04-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Culpeper Star Exponent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
According to news reports, two Senate bills &#226;&#8364;&#8221; S. 773 and S. 778 &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;would grant the White House sweeping new powers to access private online data, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.starexponent.com/cse/news/opinion/letters_to_the_editor/article/cybersecurity_act_unconstitutional/34233/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Gird your blogs!</title>
    <link href="http://americandaily.com/index.php/article/1187" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-20:/commentary/4831373</id>
    <updated>2009-04-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>American Daily</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Rockefeller, Snowe, Bayh and Nelson introduced bills S. 773 and S.778, collectively called the Cybersecurity Act, which would give President Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://americandaily.com/index.php/article/1187&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Nelson co-sponsor of Cybersecurity Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.chipleypaper.com/news/nelson_3388___article.html/cybersecurity_act.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-20:/commentary/4818876</id>
    <updated>2009-04-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Holmes County Times Advertiser</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Rockefeller, Snowe, Bayh and our own Bill Nelson introduced bills S. 773 and S.778, collectively called the Cybersecurity Act, which would give President ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chipleypaper.com/news/nelson_3388___article.html/cybersecurity_act.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Gird Your Blogs!</title>
    <link href="http://www.tulsatoday.com/newsdesk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=1940&amp;amp;Itemid=2" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-19:/commentary/4811339</id>
    <updated>2009-04-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Tulsa Today</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Brad O'Leary On April 1 st of this year, Senators Rockefeller, Snowe, Bayh and Nelson introduced bills S. 773 and S.778, collectively called the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tulsatoday.com/newsdesk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=1940&amp;amp;Itemid=2&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress Jumps Into Cyber Security: Commentary</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtech.com/gt/articles/641879" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-19:/commentary/4811338</id>
    <updated>2009-04-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Government Technology</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Now, Congress is jumping into the fray, and two new Senate bills -- S. 773 and S. 778 -- would establish the position of National Cybersecurity Advisor and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.com/gt/articles/641879&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Big Bro's Cybersecurity Act: A means to shut down the Internet</title>
    <link href="http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4609.shtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-19:/commentary/4806979</id>
    <updated>2009-04-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Online Journal</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Jerry Mazza I'm not the first to write about this little-noticed Senate bill, S.773, the Cybersecurity Act of 2009. Nor should I be the last because it ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4609.shtml&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>William Jackson | Senate's cybersecurity bill goes too far</title>
    <link href="http://gcn.com/articles/2009/04/20/cybereye-security-bill.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-16:/commentary/4791318</id>
    <updated>2009-04-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>GCN.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bill, S.773, was introduced April 1 and referred to Rockefeller's committee. It probably should remain there until the 60-day review of the nation's ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gcn.com/articles/2009/04/20/cybereye-security-bill.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Gospodarczy stan wyj&#196;&#8230;tkowy: The Cybersecurity Act of 2009</title>
    <link href="http://prawo.vagla.pl/node/8445" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-14:/commentary/4774859</id>
    <updated>2009-04-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>VaGla.pl</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... The Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (PDF) (dost&#196;&#8482;pne s&#196;&#8230; r&#195;&#179;wnie&#197;&#188; dane dotycz&#196;&#8230;ce procesu legislacyjnego, zwi&#196;&#8230;zanego z projektem S.773, to w Bibliotece Kongresu). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://prawo.vagla.pl/node/8445&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Blow-By-Blow on S.773?The Cybersecurity Act of 2009?Part 1</title>
    <link href="http://www.secuobs.com/revue/news/83111.shtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-13:/commentary/4766227</id>
    <updated>2009-04-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>SecuObs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
So the Library of Congress finally got S.773 up on http://thomas.loc.gov/. For those of you who have been hiding under a rock, this is the Cybersecurity Act ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.secuobs.com/revue/news/83111.shtml&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Cybersecurity Act of 2009</title>
    <link href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090413_cybersecurity_act_of_2009/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-12:/commentary/4760838</id>
    <updated>2009-04-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CircleID</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Steven Bellovin Four senators (Rockefeller, Bayh, Nelson, and Snowe) have recently introduced S.773, the Cybersecurity Act of 2009. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090413_cybersecurity_act_of_2009/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Jack Bauer Can't Protect Us from Cyberattacks</title>
    <link href="http://newsblaze.com/story/20090411130825zzzz.nb/topstory.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-10:/commentary/4746805</id>
    <updated>2009-04-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NewsBlaze</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Olympia Snowe (R-ME) this month introduced the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S. 773), which would permit the White House to declare ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newsblaze.com/story/20090411130825zzzz.nb/topstory.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What Will the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 Do To Your Job and Business?</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/eweek_retail/~3/EsUl2jFyTjU/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-09:/commentary/4911340</id>
    <updated>2009-04-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>eWeek</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...the government under the arguments against it.         Now the text is available in many places, including OpenCongress: S.773 is where the meat is. It starts out with a collection of provocative quotes from reports and consultants on how vulnerable we &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/eweek_retail/~3/EsUl2jFyTjU/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CNET News</title>
    <link href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10216702-83.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-09:/commentary/4746806</id>
    <updated>2009-04-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>eWeek</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.773 is where the meat is. It starts out with a collection of provocative quotes from reports and consultants on how vulnerable we are, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10216702-83.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What Will the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 Do To Your Job and Business?</title>
    <link href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/What-Will-the-Cybersecurity-Act-of-2009-Do-To-Your-Job-and-Business-768836/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-09:/commentary/4739967</id>
    <updated>2009-04-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>eWeek</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.773 is where the meat is. It starts out with a collection of provocative quotes from reports and consultants on how vulnerable we are, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/What-Will-the-Cybersecurity-Act-of-2009-Do-To-Your-Job-and-Business-768836/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New Cybersecurity Regime Proposed</title>
    <link href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech-mainmenu-30/computers/983" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-08:/commentary/4731414</id>
    <updated>2009-04-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The New American</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... every aspect of our lives and businesses had already foreseen such possible disasters and had already introduced S. 773, the Cybersecurity Act of 2009? ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech-mainmenu-30/computers/983&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WND.com</title>
    <link href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=93966" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-03:/commentary/4715724</id>
    <updated>2009-04-03T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WND.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&quot;The cybersecurity threat is real,&quot; says Leslie Harris, president of the Center for Democracy and Technology, which obtained the draft of S.773, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=93966&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Proposed Federalization of the Computer Security Field</title>
    <link href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/The-Proposed-Federalization-of-the-Computer-Security-Field-297694/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-01:/commentary/4715723</id>
    <updated>2009-04-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>eWeek</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The legislation is actually in two bills, S.773 and S.778. The titles of the bills are: S.773&#226;&#8364;&#8221;A bill to ensure the continued free flow of commerce within ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/The-Proposed-Federalization-of-the-Computer-Security-Field-297694/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
