<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : News Articles for S.778 A bill to establish, within the Executive Office of the President, the Office of National Cybersecurity Advisor.</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s778/atom_news" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s778/news" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2010-03-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/news/56484</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Commerce Committee Approves Cybersecurity Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/450693-Senate_Commerce_Committee_Approves_Cybersecurity_Act.php?rssid=20068" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-23:/commentary/7943751</id>
    <updated>2010-03-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Broadcasting &amp; Cable</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...private industry players so they could have access to classified information on threats to their networks.   A separate bill (S.778) before the Senate Homeland Security Committee would create a national cybersecurity advisor in the executive office of t&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/450693-Senate_Commerce_Committee_Approves_Cybersecurity_Act.php?rssid=20068&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity Bill Passes Senate Committee</title>
    <link href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=224200231&amp;amp;cid=RSSfeed_TechWeb" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-23:/commentary/7943750</id>
    <updated>2010-03-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>TechWeb</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...legislation that would create the national cybersecurity adviser position -- the National Cybersecurity Advisor Act, S.778 -- is still pending before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. The House last month passed its own c&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=224200231&amp;amp;cid=RSSfeed_TechWeb&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity Bill Passes Senate Committee</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=bb36299acbf1825ae700925abacfd6d5" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-23:/commentary/7938281</id>
    <updated>2010-03-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Information Week</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...legislation that would create the national cybersecurity adviser position -- the National Cybersecurity Advisor Act, S.778 -- is still pending before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. The House last month passed its own c&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=bb36299acbf1825ae700925abacfd6d5&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity Bill Passes Senate Committee</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=29c525dc06b5e008d99af4c00668392d" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-23:/commentary/7938280</id>
    <updated>2010-03-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Information Week</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...legislation that would create the national cybersecurity adviser position -- the National Cybersecurity Advisor Act, S.778 -- is still pending before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. The House last month passed its own c&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=29c525dc06b5e008d99af4c00668392d&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity Bill Trims President's Power</title>
    <link href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/cybercrime/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=224000085&amp;amp;cid=RSSfeed_TechWeb" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-17:/commentary/7892743</id>
    <updated>2010-03-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>TechWeb</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...legislation that would create the national cybersecurity adviser position -- the National Cybersecurity Advisor Act, S.778 -- is still pending before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. The new Cybersecurity Act more or les&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/cybercrime/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=224000085&amp;amp;cid=RSSfeed_TechWeb&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity Bill Trims President's Power</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=fb4092e9c6ed5c7da9c666c21200cc8c" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-17:/commentary/7892742</id>
    <updated>2010-03-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Information Week</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...legislation that would create the national cybersecurity adviser position -- the National Cybersecurity Advisor Act, S.778 -- is still pending before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. The new Cybersecurity Act more or les&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=fb4092e9c6ed5c7da9c666c21200cc8c&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity Bill Trims President's Power</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=763fd6cb1784a4ccd07e6e4b96e093ea" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-17:/commentary/7892741</id>
    <updated>2010-03-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Information Week</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...legislation that would create the national cybersecurity adviser position -- the National Cybersecurity Advisor Act, S.778 -- is still pending before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. The new Cybersecurity Act more or les&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=763fd6cb1784a4ccd07e6e4b96e093ea&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity Bill Trims President's Power</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=884999c11a702893ed082f160e706a66" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-17:/commentary/7892740</id>
    <updated>2010-03-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Information Week</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...legislation that would create the national cybersecurity adviser position -- the National Cybersecurity Advisor Act, S.778 -- is still pending before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. The new Cybersecurity Act more or les&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=884999c11a702893ed082f160e706a66&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&quot;the keen observer&quot;: Dismantling the Constitution...Obama's never-ending &quot;things to do&quot; list</title>
    <link href="http://keenobserver.blogtownhall.com/2009/05/12/dismantling_the_constitutionobamas_never-ending_things_to_do_list.thtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-05-11:/commentary/4988056</id>
    <updated>2009-05-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Town Hall</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...may be the next big shoe to drop upon our Constitutional rights --actual government control of the internet. A new bill (S.778 ) sponsored by Senators John Rockefeller (D-W. Va.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), called The Cybersecurity Act of 2009, would..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://keenobserver.blogtownhall.com/2009/05/12/dismantling_the_constitutionobamas_never-ending_things_to_do_list.thtml&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cybersecurity Act unconstitutional</title>
    <link href="http://www.starexponent.com/cse/news/opinion/letters_to_the_editor/article/cybersecurity_act_unconstitutional/34233/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-21:/commentary/4831352</id>
    <updated>2009-04-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Culpeper Star Exponent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
According to news reports, two Senate bills &#226;&#8364;&#8221; S. 773 and S. 778 &#226;&#8364;&#8221; &#226;&#8364;&#339;would grant the White House sweeping new powers to access private online data, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.starexponent.com/cse/news/opinion/letters_to_the_editor/article/cybersecurity_act_unconstitutional/34233/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Barack Obama Is Coming to Steal Your Internet</title>
    <link href="http://blog.indecisionforever.com/2009/04/21/barack-obama-is-coming-to-steal-your-internet/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-20:/commentary/4911805</id>
    <updated>2009-04-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Indecision 2008</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...destroy free speech on the Web. On April 1 of this year, Sens. Rockefeller, Snowe, Bayh and Nelson introduced bills S. 773 and S.778, collectively called the Cybersecurity Act, which would give President Obama dictatorial power over the Internet during &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.indecisionforever.com/2009/04/21/barack-obama-is-coming-to-steal-your-internet/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Gird your blogs!</title>
    <link href="http://americandaily.com/index.php/article/1187" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-20:/commentary/4831403</id>
    <updated>2009-04-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>American Daily</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Rockefeller, Snowe, Bayh and Nelson introduced bills S. 773 and S.778, collectively called the Cybersecurity Act, which would give President Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://americandaily.com/index.php/article/1187&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Nelson co-sponsor of Cybersecurity Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.chipleypaper.com/news/nelson_3388___article.html/cybersecurity_act.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-20:/commentary/4818915</id>
    <updated>2009-04-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Holmes County Times Advertiser</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Rockefeller, Snowe, Bayh and our own Bill Nelson introduced bills S. 773 and S.778, collectively called the Cybersecurity Act, which would give President ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chipleypaper.com/news/nelson_3388___article.html/cybersecurity_act.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Gird Your Blogs!</title>
    <link href="http://www.tulsatoday.com/newsdesk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=1940&amp;amp;Itemid=2" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-19:/commentary/4811384</id>
    <updated>2009-04-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Tulsa Today</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Brad O'Leary On April 1 st of this year, Senators Rockefeller, Snowe, Bayh and Nelson introduced bills S. 773 and S.778, collectively called the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tulsatoday.com/newsdesk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=1940&amp;amp;Itemid=2&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress Jumps Into Cyber Security: Commentary</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtech.com/gt/articles/641879" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-19:/commentary/4811383</id>
    <updated>2009-04-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Government Technology</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Now, Congress is jumping into the fray, and two new Senate bills -- S. 773 and S. 778 -- would establish the position of National Cybersecurity Advisor and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.com/gt/articles/641879&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Jack Bauer Can't Protect Us from Cyberattacks</title>
    <link href="http://newsblaze.com/story/20090411130825zzzz.nb/topstory.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-10:/commentary/4811390</id>
    <updated>2009-04-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NewsBlaze</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A companion bill, S. 778, creates the new &quot;cybersecurity czar&quot; to take his place among the troubling number of similarly named posts in this administration. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newsblaze.com/story/20090411130825zzzz.nb/topstory.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What Will the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 Do To Your Job and Business?</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/eweek_retail/~3/EsUl2jFyTjU/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-09:/commentary/4911807</id>
    <updated>2009-04-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>eWeek</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...set up security patronage work, and some create vast new systems of rules for how security professionals can do their jobs. S.778 is short and to the point: the National Cybersecurity Advisor is an Assistant to the President, subject to confirmation by &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/eweek_retail/~3/EsUl2jFyTjU/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10216702-83.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-09:/commentary/4811389</id>
    <updated>2009-04-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>eWeek</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.778 is short and to the point: the national cybersecurity advisor is an assistant to the president, subject to confirmation by the Senate, has specific ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10216702-83.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Cybersecurity Act of 2009 S.778:  Will President Obama Control the Internet?</title>
    <link href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1631708/the_cybersecurity_act_of_2009_s778.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-06:/commentary/4911806</id>
    <updated>2009-04-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Associated Content</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...websites are sounding the alarm about the The Cybersecurity Act of 2009 S. 778. (Viewable here: http://cdt.org/security/CYBERSEC4.pdf You'll need Adobe Reader) The bill concerns giving the government the right to monitor, and even shut down the flow of,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1631708/the_cybersecurity_act_of_2009_s778.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=93966" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-03:/commentary/4811387</id>
    <updated>2009-04-03T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WND.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 778, which would establish the Office of the National Security Advisor, and S. 773, which provides for developing a cadre of governmental cybersecurity ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=93966&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Proposed Federalization of the Computer Security Field</title>
    <link href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/The-Proposed-Federalization-of-the-Computer-Security-Field-297694/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-01:/commentary/4811385</id>
    <updated>2009-04-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>eWeek</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The legislation is actually in two bills, S.773 and S.778. The titles of the bills are: S.773&#226;&#8364;&#8221;A bill to ensure the continued free flow of commerce within ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/The-Proposed-Federalization-of-the-Computer-Security-Field-297694/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

