S.877 - A bill to provide for the non-discretionary Supreme Court review of certain civil actions relating to the legality and constitutionality of surveillance activities.

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.

A project of the Participatory Politics Foundation and the Sunlight Foundation
U.S. Congress - Text of S.877 as Introduced in Senate A bill to provide for the non-discretionary Supreme Court review of certain civil actio...A non-profit, non-partisan public resource
Everyone can be an insider. Learn how.Use the options to the right to narrow down your search results.
Sessions:
112th CongressSearch in:
The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate Now
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
S 877 ISCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
111th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
1st SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
S. 877CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To provide for the non-discretionary Supreme Court review of certain civil actions relating to the legality and constitutionality of surveillance activities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
April 23, 2009CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Mr. SPECTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To provide for the non-discretionary Supreme Court review of certain civil actions relating to the legality and constitutionality of surveillance activities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Chapter 81 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘SEC. 1260. MANDATORY SUPREME COURT REVIEW OF CERTAIN CIVIL ACTIONS CONCERNING SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES.
‘(a) In General- The Supreme Court shall, if it has not previously ruled on the question, accept jurisdiction over any appeal of an interlocutory or final judgment, decree, or order of a court of appeals in any case challenging the legality or constitutionality of--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) the President’s Surveillance Program, commonly known as the Terrorist Surveillance Program, as defined in section 301(a)(3) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 Amendments Act of 2008 (
Public Law 110-261 );CommentsClose CommentsPermalink‘(2) the statutory defenses established in Section 802(a)(4) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as amended by title II of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 Amendments Act of 2008 (
Public Law 110-261 ); orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink‘(3) any intelligence activity involving communications that was authorized by the President during the period beginning on September 11, 2001, and ending at such time as the activity was approved by a Federal court.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(b) Expedited Consideration- The Supreme Court shall advance on the docket any appeal referred to in subsection (a), and expedite the appeal to the greatest extent possible.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
The chapter analysis for chapter 81 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘Sec. 1260. Mandatory Supreme Court review of certain civil actions concerning surveillance activities.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
OpenCongress is a free and open-source project of the Participatory Politics Foundation, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization with a mission to increase civic engagement. The non-profit Sunlight Foundation is the Founding and Primary Supporter of OpenCongress.