S.J.Res.26 - A joint resolution disapproving a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the endangerment finding and the cause or contribute findings for greenhouse gases under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act.

view all titles (2)

All Bill Titles

  • Official: A joint resolution disapproving a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the endangerment finding and the cause or contribute findings for greenhouse gases under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. as introduced.
  • Official: A joint resolution disapproving a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the endangerment finding and the cause or contribute findings for greenhouse gases under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. as introduced.

This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.

Comments Feed

Displaying 31-34 of 34 total comments.

  • djezell 06/10/2010 9:09am

    You know….IF we are destroying our own way of living, I don’t want to wait until after the fact to say HAHAHA i told you so! I’d just assume that until scientists start presenting more hard evidence that we AREN’T killing ourselves, its safer to assume the worse case scenario. We have unemployement and economic issues? Oh, does that really change the possibility that there may be bigger “monsters” looming behind the next corner? We simply cant afford to take these sort of chances. Ignoring the possibility doesn’t make it go away. Disproving it does.

  • mikeb37415 06/17/2010 3:42am

    Murkowski resolution goes down to defeat in stupid episode that means nothing!!! yea!

  • dankennedy73 06/23/2010 5:20am

    I would like to thank those among my fellow countrymen whohave tried to explain global warming to the idiots, But I feel that they still don’t get it becuase the rhetoric used in the explanations is beyond their comprehension.

    Let’s put it in the simplest possible for afterall, it’s not rocket science.
    CO2=hot
    Oxygen=cool
    loudmouthed conservatives breath out CO2, make air hotter, ice caps melt, coastal cities flood, Bye bye Myrtle Beach. Maybe they’ll get that….hopefully

  • PageMaker 07/14/2010 5:11am
    Link Reply
    + -1

    There is much controversy over whether anthropomorphic CO2 emissions are responsible for current or projected atmospheric warming trends. One thing that has never been disputed, by either side (because it can’t) is the amounts of carbon dioxide that human activities are releasing into the air every year, and the corresponding increase in CO2 percentages.

    Whether one accepts – as 90+% of the world’s climate scientists now do – that greenhouse gas emissions are causing global warming or not, I always have to wonder whether these people actually think that mankind can fundamentally alter the composition of our planet’s atmosphere with no consequence at all? Although we have an overwhelming amount of scientific data amassed to support the connection between CO2 and global warming, science is unneeded to make a fundamental decision that humankind needs to seek new energy sources; simple common sense and a modicum of prudence compels us to.


Vote on This Bill

64% Users Support Bill

176 in favor / 101 opposed
 

Send Your Senator a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC

Top-Rated Comments