<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : News Articles for H.R.1249 America Invents Act</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h1249/atom_news" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h1249/news" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2012-05-17T05:32:38Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/news/69397</id>
  <entry>
    <title>House Judiciary Committee Hearing</title>
    <link href="http://insurancenewsnet.com/article.aspx?id=342833&amp;amp;type=newswires" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-05-17:/commentary/15326644</id>
    <updated>2012-05-17T05:32:38Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Insurance News Net</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Notably, during the legislative hearing on then-pending H.R. 1249, Director Kappos testified that it is more costly to the U.S. economy when patents escape subsequent review in the PTO because the threshold for determining whether to reevaluate the patent &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://insurancenewsnet.com/article.aspx?id=342833&amp;amp;type=newswires&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Prior User Rights: The Uncertainty Will Cost You</title>
    <link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/04/16/prior-user-rights-the-uncertainty-will-cost-you/id=24189/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-16:/commentary/14549127</id>
    <updated>2012-04-16T13:26:03Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPWatchdog.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[5] Markup of H.R. 1249, The America Invents Act, Committee on the Judiciary (April, 14 2011) (statement of Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner) (available at judiciary.house.gov/hearings/pdf/04142011MarkupTranscript.pdf) [6] 157 Cong. Rec. 4,492 (2011 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/04/16/prior-user-rights-the-uncertainty-will-cost-you/id=24189/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PowerPatent Introduces ProvisionalBuilder, Comprehensive Patent-Creation Software for Inventors, Entrepreneurs and Startups</title>
    <link href="http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2012/04/11/6250796.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14385769</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T10:11:33Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>TMCnet</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Time is not on the inventor&#8217;s side The America Invents Act (H.R. 1249) makes it more important than ever for inventors, startups, and small businesses to establish patent protection. In a major change, the law moves the critical invention of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2012/04/11/6250796.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PowerPatent Introduces ProvisionalBuilder, Comprehensive Patent-Creation Software for Inventors, Entrepreneurs and Startups</title>
    <link href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/4/prweb3382624.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14578816</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T07:12:36Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PRWeb</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Time is not on the inventor&#8217;s side The America Invents Act (H.R. 1249) makes it more important than ever for inventors, startups, and small businesses to establish patent protection. In a major change, the law moves the critical invention of an idea from&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/4/prweb3382624.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Naveen Modi</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/2223/author/Naveen_Modi/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-03-20:/commentary/13625742</id>
    <updated>2012-03-20T19:56:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The U.S. Senate voted by a margin of 89 to 9 on September 8, 2011, to reform U.S. patent laws by approving the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, with identical provisions to H.R. 1249, which was approved by the House of Representatives on June 23, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/2223/author/Naveen_Modi/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>United States: Something New Under The Sun: The Patent Reform Act Of 2011 Represents The First Major Overhaul Of Patent Law Since 1952</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/168554/Patent/Something+New+Under+The+Sun+The+Patent+Reform+Act+Of+2011+Represents+The+First+Major+Overhaul+Of+Patent+Law+Since+1952" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-03-15:/commentary/13373651</id>
    <updated>2012-03-15T11:33:41Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
12 35 U.S.C. &#167;325(a)(1). 13 35 U.S.C. &#167;325(a)(2). 14 35 U.S.C. &#167;257(c)(1). 15 35 U.S.C. &#167;122(e). 16 H.R. 1249 &#167;14(a). 17 H.R. 1249 &#167;14(c). 18 35 U.S.C. &#167;2(b)(2)(G). 19 35 U.S.C. &#167;273(a). 20 35 U.S.C. &#167;273(a)(2). 21 35 U.S.C. &#167;273(e)(1).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/168554/Patent/Something+New+Under+The+Sun+The+Patent+Reform+Act+Of+2011+Represents+The+First+Major+Overhaul+Of+Patent+Law+Since+1952&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>United States: Something New Under The Sun</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/168080/Patent/Something+New+Under+The+Sun" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-03-12:/commentary/13244940</id>
    <updated>2012-03-12T06:00:48Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
12 35 U.S.C. &#167;325(a)(1). 13 35 U.S.C. &#167;325(a)(2). 14 35 U.S.C. &#167;257(c)(1). 15 35 U.S.C. &#167;122(e). 16 H.R. 1249 &#167;14(a). 17 H.R. 1249 &#167;14(c). 18 35 U.S.C. &#167;2(b)(2)(G). 19 35 U.S.C. &#167;273(a). 20 35 U.S.C. &#167;273(a)(2). 21 35 U.S.C. &#167;273(e)(1).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/168080/Patent/Something+New+Under+The+Sun&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Beware the NOT so Technical AIA Technical Amendments!</title>
    <link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/20/beware-the-not-so-technical-aia-technical-amendments/id=22352/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-02-20:/commentary/12440691</id>
    <updated>2012-02-20T14:36:54Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPWatchdog.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
So what has Congress said about the estoppel provisions?&#160; On June 29, 2011, the House Judiciary Committee issued a Report on H.R. 1249 to the full House of Representatives, which says in part: In utilizing the post-grant review process ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/20/beware-the-not-so-technical-aia-technical-amendments/id=22352/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Votes in the House</title>
    <link href="http://couriernews.suntimes.com/news/10398978-417/votes-in-the-house.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-02-03:/commentary/11987049</id>
    <updated>2012-02-03T20:04:52Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chicago Sun-Times</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A yes vote backed a bill to help the United States Patent and Trademark Office reduce its backlog of 700,000 applications. (HR 1249) 7. Libya Funds Cutoff: Members on June 24 defeated, 180-238, a bill to end funding for direct U.S. military involvement in &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://couriernews.suntimes.com/news/10398978-417/votes-in-the-house.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Votes in the House</title>
    <link href="http://napervillesun.suntimes.com/10399514-417/story.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-02-02:/commentary/12025853</id>
    <updated>2012-02-02T23:55:07Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chicago Sun-Times</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A yes vote backed a bill to help the United States Patent and Trademark Office reduce its backlog of 700,000 applications. (HR 1249) 7. Libya Funds Cutoff: Members on June 24 defeated, 180-238, a bill to end funding for direct U.S. military involvement in &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://napervillesun.suntimes.com/10399514-417/story.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Tea Party drove policy, but has its clout peaked?</title>
    <link href="http://newsitem.com/opinion/tea-party-drove-policy-but-has-its-clout-peaked-1.1261491" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-24:/commentary/11712950</id>
    <updated>2012-01-24T14:47:26Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>newsitem.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(HR 1249) 7. Libya Funds Cutoff: Members on June 24 defeated, 180-238, a bill to end funding for direct U.S. military involvement in the NATO-led war over Libya, which was then in progress. A yes vote was to end funding of U.S. operations except ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newsitem.com/opinion/tea-party-drove-policy-but-has-its-clout-peaked-1.1261491&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How they voted: Tea Party's influence in Congress may be waning</title>
    <link href="http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2012/01/22/2359247/how-they-voted-tea-partys-influence.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-22:/commentary/11697841</id>
    <updated>2012-01-22T02:53:59Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bellingham Herald</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(HR 1249) 7. Libya Funds Cutoff: Members on June 24 defeated, 180-238, a bill to end funding for direct U.S. military involvement in the NATO-led war over Libya, which was then in progress. A yes vote was to end funding of U.S. operations except ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2012/01/22/2359247/how-they-voted-tea-partys-influence.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Johnson's mission: Tame federal deficit</title>
    <link href="http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20120108/GPG0101/201080617?odyssey=mod|mostcom" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-08:/commentary/11712951</id>
    <updated>2012-01-08T14:37:47Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Green Bay Press-Gazette</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
HR 1249, Patent Reform, Roll Call 129: The first major overhaul of the country's patent law in 60 years. One key change gives the patent to the first to file a complete application instead of the old system of favoring the first to invent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20120108/GPG0101/201080617?odyssey=mod|mostcom&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Johnson's mission: Tame federal deficit</title>
    <link href="http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20120108/GPG0101/201080617/Wisconsin-Sen-Ron-Johnson-s-mission-Tame-federal-deficit" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-08:/commentary/11641826</id>
    <updated>2012-01-08T14:37:47Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Green Bay Press-Gazette</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
HR 1249, Patent Reform, Roll Call 129: The first major overhaul of the country's patent law in 60 years. One key change gives the patent to the first to file a complete application instead of the old system of favoring the first to invent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20120108/GPG0101/201080617/Wisconsin-Sen-Ron-Johnson-s-mission-Tame-federal-deficit&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Johnson's mission is to tame deficit</title>
    <link href="http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20120108/GPG0101/201080617/Johnson-s-mission-tame-deficit" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-08:/commentary/11633770</id>
    <updated>2012-01-08T05:05:07Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Green Bay Press-Gazette</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
HR 1249, Patent Reform, Roll Call 129: The first major overhaul of the country's patent law in 60 years. One key change gives the patent to the first to file a complete application instead of the old system of favoring the first to invent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20120108/GPG0101/201080617/Johnson-s-mission-tame-deficit&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How Reid Ribble, Sean Duffy voted in 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20111226/GPG0101/112260470/How-Reid-Ribble-Sean-Duffy-voted-2011" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-26:/commentary/11583299</id>
    <updated>2011-12-26T04:16:07Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Green Bay Press-Gazette</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It also imposes caps on domestic spending. &#187; HR 1249, Patent Reform, Roll Call Vote 491: The first major overhaul of the country's patent law in 60 years. One key change gives the patent to the first to file a complete application instead of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20111226/GPG0101/112260470/How-Reid-Ribble-Sean-Duffy-voted-2011&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BNA Books Announces the Publication of the 2011 Supplement to &quot;Patent Litigation Strategies Handbook, Third Edition&quot;</title>
    <link href="http://news.yahoo.com/bna-books-announces-publication-2011-supplement-patent-litigation-201309468.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-12:/commentary/11513481</id>
    <updated>2011-12-12T15:09:48Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>YAHOO!</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Lansa, Inc., which required patent owners to be more detailed and rigorous in their presentation of damages evidence, and resulting legislation (H.R. 1249, the America Invents Act, and S.23, the Patent Reform Act of 2011) that did not impose any additional&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/bna-books-announces-publication-2011-supplement-patent-litigation-201309468.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Industry Shift as Trademark Attorneys Use &quot;in-a-box&quot; Solution to Take on Online Trademark Factories</title>
    <link href="http://news.yahoo.com/industry-shift-trademark-attorneys-box-solution-online-trademark-200041240.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11450871</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T14:56:35Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>YAHOO!</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Remarqueble provides brand protection services through a global partner network. One of the provisions of the new patent law reform bill (HR1249) that has recently &#8230; Full Story &#187;Bay Area Technology Law Group Examines Immediate Changes to Patent Law&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/industry-shift-trademark-attorneys-box-solution-online-trademark-200041240.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform - Changes That Take Effect Immediately</title>
    <link href="http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=8da013e4-4db4-4e41-b1e1-377dd2487a7c" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-03:/commentary/11428921</id>
    <updated>2011-11-03T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>JD Supra (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The US Senate last week passed the House version of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249) (&#8220;Act&#8221;). The Act will become law once signed by President Obama. The Act will significantly change the American patent system. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=8da013e4-4db4-4e41-b1e1-377dd2487a7c&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sweeping Patent Law Reform Enacted: How Will This Change Patent Litigation?</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/151530/Patent/Sweeping+Patent+Law+Reform+Enacted+How+Will+This+Change+Patent+Litigation" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-01:/commentary/11428923</id>
    <updated>2011-11-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq News Alerts (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The America Invents Act (HR 1249) was enacted into law on Friday September 16, 2011, marking a significant change to US patent law. The new laws will surely change our strategies for obtaining, protecting, and enforcing patent rights. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/151530/Patent/Sweeping+Patent+Law+Reform+Enacted+How+Will+This+Change+Patent+Litigation&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CEA Applauds Senate Passage of America Invents Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/11/10/b2049112/cea-applauds-senate-passage-of-america-invents-act" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-10-29:/commentary/11428922</id>
    <updated>2011-10-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Benzinga (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) &#174; applauds the US Senate Judiciary Committee and Chairman Patrick Leahy on the approval of HR 1249, the America Invents Act. The patent reform bill now heads to the desk of President Barack Obama for his ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/11/10/b2049112/cea-applauds-senate-passage-of-america-invents-act&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Our Worst Investment, Congress</title>
    <link href="http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/index.php/2011/10/27/congress/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-10-27:/commentary/11428924</id>
    <updated>2011-10-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DesMoinesRegister.com (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 HR 1249, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, is the most significant change to the US patent system since 1952. (Nice going, guys) HR 4 repeals expanded Form 1099 information reporting requirements for certain business payments and rental property ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/index.php/2011/10/27/congress/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Mr. Smith&amp;#39;s Whistle Stop in Bandera County</title>
    <link href="http://www.bccourier.com/Archives/News_detail.php?contentId=9123" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-10-26:/commentary/11428925</id>
    <updated>2011-10-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bandera County Courier</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 By streamlining the application process, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act - HR 1249 - will generate several hundred thousand jobs, Smith said. President Barack Obama signed the bill into law in September. Smith noted, &amp;quot;The law allows patents to be&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bccourier.com/Archives/News_detail.php?contentId=9123&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Purchase my eBook: Mark-Up and Commentary on the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/10/purchase-my-ebook-mark-up-and-commentary-on-the-leahy-smith-america-invents-act.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-10-24:/commentary/11425139</id>
    <updated>2011-10-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patently-O</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 (dcrouch@patentlyo.com) President Obama recently enacted the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, Public Law No 112-29 (HR 1249). The new law makes a large number of changes to Title 35 of the US Code and other related statutes. I have received a number of ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/10/purchase-my-ebook-mark-up-and-commentary-on-the-leahy-smith-america-invents-act.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Evolution of Patent Law Under the America Invents Act of 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-evolution-of-patent-law-under-the-america-invents-act-of-2011-2011-10-12" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-10-12:/commentary/11417033</id>
    <updated>2011-10-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>MarketWatch (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 ARLINGTON, Va., Oct. 12, 2011 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- The recently enacted Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249) marks the most significant changes to patent law in nearly sixty years. In addition to changing the US right to the patent from the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-evolution-of-patent-law-under-the-america-invents-act-of-2011-2011-10-12&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Evolution of Patent Law Under the America Invents Act of 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-evolution-of-patent-law-under-the-america-invents-act-of-2011-131627918.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-10-12:/commentary/11382993</id>
    <updated>2011-10-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PR Newswire (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 ARLINGTON, Va., Oct. 12, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The recently enacted Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249) marks the most significant changes to patent law in nearly sixty years. In addition to changing the US right to the patent from the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-evolution-of-patent-law-under-the-america-invents-act-of-2011-131627918.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PTO Announces Hearings, Comment Requests For Prior User, Small Business Patent ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.bna.com/patent-trademark-office-n12884903848/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-10-12:/commentary/11382408</id>
    <updated>2011-10-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Bureau of National Affairs (BNA)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In accordance with the recently enacted America Invents Act (HR 1249, Pub. L. No. 112-29), the Patent and Trademark Office issued two Federal Register notices Oct. 7 announcing public hearings and requesting comments on the AIA&amp;#39;s ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bna.com/patent-trademark-office-n12884903848/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How the America Invents Act impacts inventions made with government funds</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9ab57dc5-3ca4-40d1-b15b-d3de4ef2d65f" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-10-10:/commentary/11379897</id>
    <updated>2011-10-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On September 16, 2011, President Obama signed into law the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, HR 1249 (the &#8220;AIA&#8221;), a landmark patent-reform bill with far-reaching effects on US patent law. The AIA&amp;#39;s provisions take effect at various times, ranging f&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9ab57dc5-3ca4-40d1-b15b-d3de4ef2d65f&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Section 34: more than just another government study?</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=f056f050-01ac-44c8-bb30-ccd50b788c25" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-10-07:/commentary/11370998</id>
    <updated>2011-10-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On April 14, 2011, the House Judiciary Committee voted 32-3 to send an amended version of HR 1249 to the floor for debate. One of the changes to the Bill coming out of the Judiciary Committee was the inclusion of Section 34, which orders the ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=f056f050-01ac-44c8-bb30-ccd50b788c25&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New US Patent Law: The America Invents Act Of 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/147240/Patent/NEW+US+PATENT+LAW+The+America+Invents+Act+Of+2011" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-30:/commentary/11351397</id>
    <updated>2011-09-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq News Alerts (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Smith-Leahy America Invents Act (HR 1249), signed into law on September 19, 2011, represents the first major revision to US patent law since the Patent Act of 1952. At the highest level, the Act changes the patent landscape in three significant ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/147240/Patent/NEW+US+PATENT+LAW+The+America+Invents+Act+Of+2011&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>USPTO Implements AIA Changes to Inter Partes Reexamination</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/09/uspto-implements-aia-changes-to-inter-partes-reexamination.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-29:/commentary/11347280</id>
    <updated>2011-09-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 ... legislators noted at page 165 that &amp;quot;the practical meaning of the new [reasonable likelihood] standard in HR 1249 is not clear and creates a risk that the PTO will reject legitimate petitions at the outset of the procedure, without further inquiry&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/09/uspto-implements-aia-changes-to-inter-partes-reexamination.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>U.S. patent reform alters false marking landscape</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6917240e-163b-4f6e-9008-670456335a62" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-27:/commentary/11341456</id>
    <updated>2011-09-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Provisions in the recently passed America Invents Act (HR 1249) have changed the laws regarding false marking, and may help eliminate marking trolls. Most notably, the America Invents Act removed the standing for &#8220;any person&#8221; to sue for false marking &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6917240e-163b-4f6e-9008-670456335a62&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Signed patent reform protects businesses against &amp;#39;meritless&amp;#39; lawsuits</title>
    <link href="http://ifawebnews.com/2011/09/27/signed-patent-reform-protects-businesses-against-meritless-lawsuits/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-27:/commentary/11341455</id>
    <updated>2011-09-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IFAwebnews.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Section 18 of the bill (HR 1249), sponsored by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), establishes a program at the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), where business-method patents can be re-examined to assess their validity. Before the law, companies that were ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ifawebnews.com/2011/09/27/signed-patent-reform-protects-businesses-against-meritless-lawsuits/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IN RE CONAIR CORPORATION</title>
    <link href="http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20FCO%2020110923090.xml&amp;amp;docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-26:/commentary/11337766</id>
    <updated>2011-09-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Leagle.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On September 16, 2011, the President signed into law the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, HR 1249, 112th Cong. (1st Sess. 2011), amending 35 USC &#167; 292 and including the following text regarding the effective date of this provision: &amp;quot;The amendments m&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20FCO%2020110923090.xml&amp;amp;docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Obama signs patent reform bill into law; implementation requires funding</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6378133a-2310-43bf-adef-094967f3bc51" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-23:/commentary/11334529</id>
    <updated>2011-09-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 At a minimum, HR 1249 requires USPTO to hire 1500-2000 examiners and 100 administrative law judges. USPTO has issued several documents providing guidance on the law&amp;#39;s requirements, including a table of effective dates and a new fee schedule. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6378133a-2310-43bf-adef-094967f3bc51&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Summary Of The Impending United States Patent Act The Leahy-Smith America ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/146304/Patent/Summary+of+the+Impending+United+States+Patent+Act+the+LeahySmith+America+Invents+Act" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-22:/commentary/11334915</id>
    <updated>2011-09-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq News Alerts (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 HR 1249, sec. 6. Infringement Defense. The Act establishes a defense to infringement based on prior commercial use. This defense extends the prior use defense beyond business method patents to all areas of technology. It is a personal defense, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/146304/Patent/Summary+of+the+Impending+United+States+Patent+Act+the+LeahySmith+America+Invents+Act&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>USPTO prepares to end inter partes patent reexamination</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=44580eba-1057-446d-8317-360cfcbf7235" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-22:/commentary/11326737</id>
    <updated>2011-09-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 (See 6(c)(3)(C) of HR 1249. On the one year anniversary of enactment, Section 314 of the AIA will go into effect to apply the same standard for Inter Partes Review. That is to say, inter partes patent reexamination filings will no longer be accepted on ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=44580eba-1057-446d-8317-360cfcbf7235&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>USPTO post grant cheat sheet</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=fb75b72e-ff43-4ac8-828c-8fa474387f58" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-21:/commentary/11405052</id>
    <updated>2011-09-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 HR 1249 at page 29. Side Notes: The SNQ standard, which is no longer used in inter partes patent reexamination is still used in ex parte patent reexamination. Ex parte patent reexamination practice remains largely unchanged by the AIA. 2. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=fb75b72e-ff43-4ac8-828c-8fa474387f58&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>US Patent Law Reform 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=eba12067-0160-4ef2-bdec-f9f3fee60898" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-21:/commentary/11334916</id>
    <updated>2011-09-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>JD Supra (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On September 16, 2011 President Obama signed Bill HR 1249 which had previously been passed by The House of Representatives and the Senate. The main features of the new law will for the most part will take effect one year after enactment. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=eba12067-0160-4ef2-bdec-f9f3fee60898&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>On Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=9168" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-21:/commentary/11326735</id>
    <updated>2011-09-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Citizen Economists (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 President Obama today signed into law the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249) a bipartisan, bicameral bill that updates our patent system to encourage innovation, job creation and economic growth. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=9168&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Taxes As Seen On TV?</title>
    <link href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2011/09/20/taxes-as-seen-on-tv/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-20:/commentary/11319632</id>
    <updated>2011-09-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Forbes</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 With the stroke of a pen, President Obama signed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, HR 1249, enacting comprehensive patent reform that stops the US Patent and Trademark Office from issuing patents for tax strategy methods. Tax-centric groups like the ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2011/09/20/taxes-as-seen-on-tv/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The America Invents Act &#8211; How it All Went Down</title>
    <link href="http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/20/the-america-invents-act-how-it-all-went-down/id=19294/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-20:/commentary/11319631</id>
    <updated>2011-09-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPWatchdog.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Their version of the AIA was introduced as HR 1249 on March 30, 2011. HR 1249 as drafted by staff departed from S.23 in several major respects: It adopted the structure of the S.23 PGR/IPR amendment, but (i) retained the existing &#8220;substantial new ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/20/the-america-invents-act-how-it-all-went-down/id=19294/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>President Obama Signs Patent Reform Into Law</title>
    <link href="http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=264f677b-56d4-471d-9509-8a406c5cc40c" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-19:/commentary/11390552</id>
    <updated>2011-09-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>JD Supra (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 After months of debate in both the House and the Senate, the America Invents Act (House Bill HR 1249) is law. Only time will tell, however, if the act lives up to its talking points. The act certainly favors larger entities that have the resources to ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=264f677b-56d4-471d-9509-8a406c5cc40c&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>President Obama signs patent reform into law</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=dff5c29a-2bc4-4f98-9c57-f9f8afda6a49" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-19:/commentary/11312423</id>
    <updated>2011-09-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 After months of debate in both the House and the Senate, the America Invents Act (House Bill HR 1249) is law. Only time will tell, however, if the act lives up to its talking points. The act certainly favors larger entities that have the resources to ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=dff5c29a-2bc4-4f98-9c57-f9f8afda6a49&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bracewell &amp;amp; Giuliani | President Obama Signs Patent Reform Into Law</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2684343" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-17:/commentary/11310338</id>
    <updated>2011-09-17T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 After months of debate in both the House and the Senate, the America Invents Act (House Bill HR 1249) is law. Only time will tell, however, if the act lives up to its talking points. The act certainly favors larger entities that have the resources to ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2684343&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Statement From DuPont Chair and CEO Ellen Kullman on The America Invents Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.sacbee.com/2011/09/16/3915419/statement-from-dupont-chair-and.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11312472</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sacramento Bee</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 16, 2011 -- /PRNewswire/ -- The following statement has been provided by DuPont Chair and CEO Ellen Kullman who attended the signing of The America Invents Act (HR 1249) by US President Barack Obama today. Kullman is a member of the President&amp;#39;s Counci&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacbee.com/2011/09/16/3915419/statement-from-dupont-chair-and.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Life Technologies praises Obama&amp;#39;s signing of the America Invents Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.news-medical.net/news/20110916/Life-Technologies-praises-Obamas-signing-of-the-America-Invents-Act.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11312441</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>News-Medical.net</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Life Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: LIFE) applauds the signing by President Barack Obama of &amp;quot;The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act&amp;quot; (HR 1249). President Obama will sign the bill today at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology i&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news-medical.net/news/20110916/Life-Technologies-praises-Obamas-signing-of-the-America-Invents-Act.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ban on Human Embryo Patents Culminates 8-Year NRLC Effort</title>
    <link href="http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org/news/2011/09/ban-on-human-embryo-patents-culminates-8-year-nrlc-effort/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11312422</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>National Right to Life News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The pro-life policy was enacted as part of a bill called the &#8220;America Invents Act&#8221; (HR 1249). The bill, which runs 58 pages in its final form, makes numerous changes to the laws that govern the granting of patents in the United States, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org/news/2011/09/ban-on-human-embryo-patents-culminates-8-year-nrlc-effort/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>USW: America Invents Act Advocates Good Jobs, Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/423289" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11311784</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DigitalJournal.com (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 16, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Leo W. Gerard, International President of the United Steelworkers (USW), issued the following statement today in advance of President Obama signing into law the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249) passed by ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/423289&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress passes patent reform legislation</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0ad01422-c627-46bf-874b-fdf16466391d" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11311782</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249) was one of the first bills taken up by Congress upon return from its summer recess. While most of the legislation&amp;#39;s provisions will not go into effect for at least one year, there are a number of important&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0ad01422-c627-46bf-874b-fdf16466391d&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Statement From DuPont Chair and CEO Ellen Kullman on The America Invents Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/statement-from-dupont-chair-and-ceo-ellen-kullman-on-the-america-invents-act-2011-09-16" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11311781</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>MarketWatch (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 16, 2011 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- The following statement has been provided by DuPont Chair and CEO Ellen Kullman who attended the signing of The America Invents Act (HR 1249) by US President Barack Obama today. Kullman is a member of the President&amp;#39;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketwatch.com/story/statement-from-dupont-chair-and-ceo-ellen-kullman-on-the-america-invents-act-2011-09-16&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DuPont CEO Ellen Kullman Releases Statement On America Invents Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.rttnews.com/Content/QuickFacts.aspx?Id=1715563&amp;amp;SM=1" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11311779</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>RTT News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Ellen Kullman attended the signing of The America Invents Act (HR 1249) by US President Barack Obama today. Kullman is a member of the President&amp;#39;s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. Ellen Kullman said, &amp;quot;The Act will speed R&amp;amp;D investment, ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rttnews.com/Content/QuickFacts.aspx?Id=1715563&amp;amp;SM=1&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Alston &amp;amp; Bird | America Invents Act: What You Need to Know</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2679724" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11310342</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Previously, on March 8, 2011, the Senate passed S. 23, a somewhat different version of the AIA, by a vote of 95-5, and in June, the US House of Representatives passed its own &#8220;patent reform&#8221; bill, HR 1249 by a similarly wide margin, 304-117. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2679724&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Statement From DuPont Chair and CEO Ellen Kullman on The America Invents Act</title>
    <link href="http://uspolitics.einnews.com/pr-news/537270-statement-from-dupont-chair-and-ceo-ellen-kullman-on-the-america-invents-act" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11310341</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>U.S. Politics Today</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 16, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- The following statement has been provided by DuPont Chair and CEO Ellen Kullman who attended the signing of The America Invents Act (HR 1249) by US President Barack Obama today. Kullman is a member of the President&amp;#39;s Council o&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://uspolitics.einnews.com/pr-news/537270-statement-from-dupont-chair-and-ceo-ellen-kullman-on-the-america-invents-act&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Life Technologies Applauds Signing of Patent Reform Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.sunherald.com/2011/09/16/3434083/life-technologies-applauds-signing.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11310340</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>SunHerald.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 16, 2011 -- /PRNewswire/ -- Life Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: LIFE) applauds the signing by President Barack Obama of &amp;quot;The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act&amp;quot; (HR 1249). President Obama will sign the bill today at Thomas Jefferson High School &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sunherald.com/2011/09/16/3434083/life-technologies-applauds-signing.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>America Invents Act passed by US Senate</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=b985c207-4b3e-41df-944c-e8961d6d13c2" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11310339</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On 8 September 2011, the US Senate overwhelmingly passed the America Invents Act (HR 1249) to reform the US Patent system. The bill will be signed by President Obama during the coming days. Here is a summary of the most important changes. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=b985c207-4b3e-41df-944c-e8961d6d13c2&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>USW: America Invents Act Advocates Good Jobs, Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/usw-america-invents-act-advocates-good-jobs-patent-reform-129944488.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11310334</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PR Newswire (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 16, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Leo W. Gerard, International President of the United Steelworkers (USW), issued the following statement today in advance of President Obama signing into law the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249) passed by ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/usw-america-invents-act-advocates-good-jobs-patent-reform-129944488.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>USW: America Invents Act Advocates Good Jobs, Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.sacbee.com/2011/09/16/3915175/usw-america-invents-act-advocates.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11310324</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sacramento Bee</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249) was passed by the House in June and the Senate in September. Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the flag icon ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacbee.com/2011/09/16/3915175/usw-america-invents-act-advocates.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Life Technologies Applauds Signing Of Patent Reform Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.dailymarkets.com/stock/2011/09/16/life-technologies-applauds-signing-of-patent-reform-bill/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11308933</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Markets</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 16, 2011 /PRNewswire/ &#8212; Life Technologies Corporation (LIFE) applauds the signing by President Barack Obama of &#8220;The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act&#8221; (HR 1249). President Obama will sign the bill today at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymarkets.com/stock/2011/09/16/life-technologies-applauds-signing-of-patent-reform-bill/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Statement From DuPont Chair and CEO Ellen Kullman on The America Invents Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.sunherald.com/2011/09/16/3434563/statement-from-dupont-chair-and.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11308932</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>SunHerald.com (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 16, 2011 -- /PRNewswire/ -- The following statement has been provided by DuPont Chair and CEO Ellen Kullman who attended the signing of The America Invents Act (HR 1249) by US President Barack Obama today. Kullman is a member of the President&amp;#39;s Counci&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sunherald.com/2011/09/16/3434563/statement-from-dupont-chair-and.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Life Technologies Applauds Signing of Patent Reform Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.sacbee.com/2011/09/16/3915124/life-technologies-applauds-signing.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11308908</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sacramento Bee</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 16, 2011 -- /PRNewswire/ -- Life Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: LIFE) applauds the signing by President Barack Obama of &amp;quot;The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act&amp;quot; (HR 1249). President Obama will sign the bill today at Thomas Jefferson High School &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacbee.com/2011/09/16/3915124/life-technologies-applauds-signing.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>USW: America Invents Act Advocates Good Jobs, Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://insurancenewsnet.com/article.aspx?id=277392" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11308907</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Insurance News Net (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 16, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Leo W. Gerard , International President of the United Steelworkers (USW), issued the following statement today in advance of President Obama signing into law the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249) passed by ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://insurancenewsnet.com/article.aspx?id=277392&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Statement From DuPont Chair and CEO Ellen Kullman on The America Invents Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/statement-from-dupont-chair-and-ceo-ellen-kullman-on-the-america-invents-act-129951438.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11308905</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PR Newswire (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 16, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- The following statement has been provided by DuPont Chair and CEO Ellen Kullman who attended the signing of The America Invents Act (HR 1249) by US President Barack Obama today. Kullman is a member of the President&amp;#39;s Council o&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/statement-from-dupont-chair-and-ceo-ellen-kullman-on-the-america-invents-act-129951438.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>America Invents: Immediate Changes to Patent Law Start Today</title>
    <link href="http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/16/america-invents-immediate-changes-to-patent-law-start-today/id=19232/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11304297</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPWatchdog.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 See Section 11(i) of HR 1249. An option for &#8220;Prioritized Examination,&#8221; which has an associated $4800 fee (reduced by 50% for small entities) in addition to general statutory fees, will take effect on September 26, 2011. See Section 11(h) of HR 1249. .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/16/america-invents-immediate-changes-to-patent-law-start-today/id=19232/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &amp;amp; Dunner, LLP | IP Update: America ...</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2680079" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11304253</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The US Senate voted on September 8, 2011, to reform US patent laws by approving the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, with identical provisions to HR 1249, which was approved by the House of Representatives on June 23, 2011. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2680079&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>University of Vermont Programs Foster Innovation and Economic Development in State</title>
    <link href="http://www.uvm.edu/~uvmpr/?Page=news&amp;amp;storyID=12379&amp;amp;category=ucommtop" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11304252</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>UVM News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 ... and Land-grant Universities and the American Association of Universities, was part of a ceremony at Thomas Jefferson High School in Alexandria, Va., during which President Barack Obama signed the Leahy-Smith American Invents Act (HR 1249) into law. ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uvm.edu/~uvmpr/?Page=news&amp;amp;storyID=12379&amp;amp;category=ucommtop&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Smith Patent Reform Bill Becomes Law</title>
    <link href="http://www.texasgopvote.com/grow-economy/smith-patent-reform-bill-becomes-law-003310" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-16:/commentary/11304251</id>
    <updated>2011-09-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Texas GOP Vote</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 By Texas GOP Vote President Obama today signed into law the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249) a bipartisan, bicameral bill that updates our patent system to encourage innovation, job creation and economic growth. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.texasgopvote.com/grow-economy/smith-patent-reform-bill-becomes-law-003310&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress Approves Bill Banning Patenting of Human Embryos</title>
    <link href="http://www.lifenews.com/2011/09/15/congress-approves-bill-banning-patenting-of-human-embryos/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-15:/commentary/11300581</id>
    <updated>2011-09-15T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>LifeNews.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 But, language added to HR 1249, the America Invents Act, which received a final vote today, will codify an important pro-life policy rider included in the federal appropriations bills since 2004. This amendment, commonly known as the Weldon amendment, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lifenews.com/2011/09/15/congress-approves-bill-banning-patenting-of-human-embryos/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Intellectual Property Law Alert - US Congress Passes Historic Patent Reform Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/145482/Patent/Intellectual+Property+Law+Alert+US+Congress+Passes+Historic+Patent+Reform+Bill" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-15:/commentary/11293869</id>
    <updated>2011-09-15T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq News Alerts (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 8, the US Senate overwhelmingly voted, 89-9, to pass the &amp;quot;America Invents Act&amp;quot; (HR 1249), which the US House of Representatives passed in late June. President Obama previously indicated he would sign the bill. Identified as a patent reform bill,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/145482/Patent/Intellectual+Property+Law+Alert+US+Congress+Passes+Historic+Patent+Reform+Bill&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Nixon Peabody | Trade secret assets: prior user rights expanded under the ...</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2672756" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-15:/commentary/11293868</id>
    <updated>2011-09-15T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On September 8, 2011, the Senate approved the House version of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249). President Obama is expected to sign the bill into law on September 16, 2011. This historic patent reform legislation impacts 71 existing ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2672756&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress Revamps Patent System</title>
    <link href="http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/89/i38/8938notw2.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-15:/commentary/11293839</id>
    <updated>2011-09-15T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical &amp;amp; Engineering News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The legislation (HR 1249), which the Senate cleared with broad support on Sept. 8, aims to streamline the review process and give the Patent &amp;amp; Trademark Office (PTO) the resources to tackle a backlog of nearly 700000 unexamined patent applications. ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/89/i38/8938notw2.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Navigating the shifts in US patent law</title>
    <link href="http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4227217/Navigating-the-shifts-in-U-S--patent-law" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-15:/commentary/11293838</id>
    <updated>2011-09-15T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>EE Times</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 OTTAWA -- The America Invents Act (House Bill HR 1249) was passed by the United States Senate on September 8, 2011 and is expected to be signed by President Obama in short order. This is the most vigorous revision of US patent law since the 1950&amp;#39;s. ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4227217/Navigating-the-shifts-in-U-S--patent-law&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Techcomm</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e187e9d0-dbb5-4ca6-9697-e6257b111de1" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-14:/commentary/11312424</id>
    <updated>2011-09-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Having fended off efforts by both Republican and Democratic Members to send long-pending patent reform legislation back to the House for further consideration, the Senate approved a clean House-passed version of the America Invents Act (HR 1249) by a ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e187e9d0-dbb5-4ca6-9697-e6257b111de1&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Obama Expected to Sign Patent Reform Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.trcbnews.com/obama-expected-to-sign-patent-reform-bill/114904/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-14:/commentary/11311783</id>
    <updated>2011-09-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>TRCB News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 8 September the Senate approved the house version, with 89 censures supporting the bill and nine opposing HR 1249. The bill was amended with a variety of legal mumbo-jumbo. Within one year of the bill passing, the Small Business Administration Must ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.trcbnews.com/obama-expected-to-sign-patent-reform-bill/114904/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Navigating the shifts in U.S. patent law</title>
    <link href="http://www.design-reuse.com/news/27294/us-patent-law-revision.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-14:/commentary/11311780</id>
    <updated>2011-09-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Design and Reuse (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 OTTAWA -- The America Invents Act (House Bill HR 1249) was passed by the United States Senate on September 8, 2011 and is expected to be signed by President Obama in short order. This is the most vigorous revision of US patent law since the 1950&amp;#39;s. ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.design-reuse.com/news/27294/us-patent-law-revision.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Passes Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/145374/Government+Statutory+Law/Senate+Passes+Patent+Reform" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-14:/commentary/11310337</id>
    <updated>2011-09-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq News Alerts (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On Thursday, September 8th, the United States Senate passed the America Invents Act (HR 1249) in a bipartisan 89&#8211;9 vote. In passing the bill, the Senate rejected three proposed amendments to the bill. The most controversial proposed amendment was ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/145374/Government+Statutory+Law/Senate+Passes+Patent+Reform&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Passes The America Invents Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/145396/Trademark/Senate+Passes+The+America+Invents+Act" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-14:/commentary/11310336</id>
    <updated>2011-09-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq News Alerts (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 This evening, the US Senate passed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, HR 1249 (the &amp;quot;Act&amp;quot;). The Act includes the provisions impacting fees, Patent and Trademark Office (&amp;quot;PTO&amp;quot;) proceedings and litigation proceedings that will take effe&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/145396/Trademark/Senate+Passes+The+America+Invents+Act&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Stakeholders Provide Suggestions to Prepare For Changes in Practice After ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.bna.com/stakeholders-provide-suggestions-n12884903460/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-14:/commentary/11308931</id>
    <updated>2011-09-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Bureau of National Affairs (BNA)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 8 Senate vote on HR 1249. &#8220;After four attempts in the last six years, Congress has passed a bill that will reinvent the current US patent system, which has been in place for almost 60 years,&#8221; said Naveen Modi of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bna.com/stakeholders-provide-suggestions-n12884903460/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sweeping patent reform legislation passed by Senate</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9ca5bdbb-b433-4438-ad1e-d1e546ef8a81" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-14:/commentary/11300583</id>
    <updated>2011-09-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On September 8, 2011, the US Senate passed the House Patent Reform bill (HR 1249). This represents the culmination of a decade of attempts to pass patent reform legislation in the United States. The highlight of the legislation is a change from a ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9ca5bdbb-b433-4438-ad1e-d1e546ef8a81&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Proposed US patent law reform &#8211; implications for Australian business</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e1e684c7-33c3-40b8-8495-24b08391ad1d" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-14:/commentary/11300582</id>
    <updated>2011-09-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The &amp;#39;America Invents Act&amp;#39; (HR 1249), which contains the most significant US patent law reform as of the last 20 years, is expected to be signed into law by President Obama by 1 October 2011. The full commercial impact for Australian businesses wit&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e1e684c7-33c3-40b8-8495-24b08391ad1d&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Education</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=211febab-52d8-4aea-88a8-147f0945c152" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-14:/commentary/11291712</id>
    <updated>2011-09-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On September 8, the Senate approved the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249) without amendment, by an 89-9 vote, sending the measure to President Obama for his signature. The vote marks the end to a six-year effort to overhaul the patent system ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=211febab-52d8-4aea-88a8-147f0945c152&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BSA Cheers Final Passage of Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.ag-ip-news.com/news.aspx?id=27824&amp;amp;lang=en" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-13:/commentary/11310335</id>
    <updated>2011-09-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ag-IP-news Agency</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Washington, DC - After seven years of pressing for a modernization of the outdated US patent system, the Business Software Alliance (BSA) hailed in a press release the US Senate&amp;#39;s final passage of the America Invents Act (HR 1249). ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ag-ip-news.com/news.aspx?id=27824&amp;amp;lang=en&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform clears final hurdle -- President Obama expected to sign America ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7388835d-3694-4fab-ac96-fc57aad48450" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-13:/commentary/11287750</id>
    <updated>2011-09-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Senate approved the House bill without amendment, so the final text of the new law can be found in HR 1249 as passed by the House on June 23, 2011. While many provisions of the law will not take effect for at least one year after the date of ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7388835d-3694-4fab-ac96-fc57aad48450&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The post grant buzz (Fall 2011)</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=66da32f5-8888-4a07-b803-70de9504eed7" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-13:/commentary/11287719</id>
    <updated>2011-09-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 (See HR 1249, Sec. 11 Fees for Patent Services) The 15% surcharge will be implemented 10 days after enactment, the increased cash is immediately available to the agency. Hiring, the USPTO is currently seeking Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) across ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=66da32f5-8888-4a07-b803-70de9504eed7&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>America invents new patent laws with Senate vote</title>
    <link href="http://www.cpaglobal.com/newlegalreview/4949/america_invents_new_patent_law" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-13:/commentary/11287716</id>
    <updated>2011-09-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CPA Global</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Following efforts to reform the US patent system in 2005, 2007 and 2009, US Congress has finally passed the latest attempt, HR 1249 &#8211; better known as the America Invents Act. The legislation cleared the Senate on 8 September in an 89-to-nine vote, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpaglobal.com/newlegalreview/4949/america_invents_new_patent_law&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>This Week in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/09/12/1015706/-This-Week-in-Congress" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-12:/commentary/11352240</id>
    <updated>2011-09-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Kos</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 This week&amp;#39;s product was HR 1249, the &amp;quot;America Invents Act,&amp;quot; a/k/a the patent reform bill. None of the offered amendments passed, so with the bill&amp;#39;s passage in the Senate, the bill should shortly be on its way to the President. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/09/12/1015706/-This-Week-in-Congress&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Licensing Executives Society (U.S.A. and Canada) Urges Swift Enactment of Long ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.bradenton.com/2011/09/12/3488131/licensing-executives-society-usa.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-12:/commentary/11344977</id>
    <updated>2011-09-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bradenton Herald</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &#8220;The Licensing Executives Society (USA and Canada), Inc. applauds the recent passage of the America Invents Act (HR 1249) and we encourage President Obama to promptly sign it into law. LES (USA &amp;amp; Canada) is devoted to bringing innovation to market t&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradenton.com/2011/09/12/3488131/licensing-executives-society-usa.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What patent reform means for retailers: 4 key provisions of the America Invent Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9476f48f-c42f-4db8-b17e-75fdcad22af6" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-12:/commentary/11312443</id>
    <updated>2011-09-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The critical take-away is that the Senate has limited debate on the House version of the America Invents Act, HR 1249, (the &#8220;AIA&#8221;) to thirty hours, and prevented further amendment of the bill. There are currently only a few amendments, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9476f48f-c42f-4db8-b17e-75fdcad22af6&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The America Invents Act and what it means for the future of patent acquisition ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=668dfcc5-22c4-4730-aaef-730221e34a67" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-12:/commentary/11312442</id>
    <updated>2011-09-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On September 8, 2011, the United States Senate approved the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249), finalizing congressional acceptance of long-anticipated US patent reform. The Senate&amp;#39;s passage comes only months after the House of Representatives &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=668dfcc5-22c4-4730-aaef-730221e34a67&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress passes patent reform bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=1f11086a-e59a-4cd8-bd74-6347b0081f7d" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-12:/commentary/11312440</id>
    <updated>2011-09-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On September 8, 2011, the Senate passed the America Invents Act (HR 1249) (&#8220;the Act&#8221;), culminating a six year debate on patent reform in the United States. The Act is expected to be signed by the President, with some provisions taking effect ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=1f11086a-e59a-4cd8-bd74-6347b0081f7d&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform bill passes Senate</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=efabb82f-5d3f-4fd0-935a-f10ac0f41db2" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-12:/commentary/11312439</id>
    <updated>2011-09-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Yesterday, the Senate passed the America Invents Act of 2011 (HR 1249), the most significant legislative change in patent law in nearly 60 years. The President is expected to sign the bill into law within the next week or two. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=efabb82f-5d3f-4fd0-935a-f10ac0f41db2&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A primer on the new patent law</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=f731f4cd-4ff8-4880-8f7d-4936e150237e" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-12:/commentary/11312438</id>
    <updated>2011-09-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On September 8, 2011, the Senate passed HR 1249, better known as the &#8220;Leahy-Smith America Invents Act,&#8221; which significantly amends the patent laws of the United States. The bill is expected to be signed into law by the President. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=f731f4cd-4ff8-4880-8f7d-4936e150237e&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform now one signature away: Senate sends historic bill to ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=cb554395-534d-4d19-9bb5-c563b48a656a" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-12:/commentary/11312437</id>
    <updated>2011-09-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Moments ago, the United States Senate voted 89 to 9 to send House Bill HR 1249 (titled &amp;quot;the America Invents Act&amp;quot;) to President Obama&amp;#39;s desk. Although a few last-minute amendments momentarily threatened to stall the bill&amp;#39;s passage, the Se&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=cb554395-534d-4d19-9bb5-c563b48a656a&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Licensing Executives Society (U.S.A. and Canada) Urges Swift Enactment of Long ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110912006611/en/Licensing-Executives-Society-U.S.A.-Canada-Urges-Swift" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-12:/commentary/11308906</id>
    <updated>2011-09-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Business Wire (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &#8220;The Licensing Executives Society (USA and Canada), Inc. applauds the recent passage of the America Invents Act (HR 1249) and we encourage President Obama to promptly sign it into law. LES (USA &amp;amp; Canada) is devoted to bringing innovation to market t&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110912006611/en/Licensing-Executives-Society-U.S.A.-Canada-Urges-Swift&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent litigation at the USPTO under the America Invents Act of 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=de7eb6b7-952e-4039-87ba-a608f0c2dcc4" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-12:/commentary/11287749</id>
    <updated>2011-09-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Such legislation, if enacted, is expected to track the substance of the America Invents Act, HR 1249 (&#8220;the Act&#8221;). A major aim of the reform legislation is to establish the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) as an alternative forum to US&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=de7eb6b7-952e-4039-87ba-a608f0c2dcc4&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>US Senate Overwhelmingly Approves &amp;#39;Critical&amp;#39; Patent Reform Despite Detractors</title>
    <link href="http://www.tmcnet.com/topics/articles/217259-us-senate-overwhelmingly-approves-critical-patent-reform-despite.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-12:/commentary/11287718</id>
    <updated>2011-09-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>TMC Net</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &#8220;Senate passage of HR 1249 is a momentous accomplishment which promises to make long-overdue improvements to the patent system,&#8221; adds AIPLA President David Hill in a press release. &#8220;The bill represents the result of needed bi-partisan efforts to rea&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tmcnet.com/topics/articles/217259-us-senate-overwhelmingly-approves-critical-patent-reform-despite.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patton Boggs | Capital Thinking Update - September 12, 2011</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2642202" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-12:/commentary/11284105</id>
    <updated>2011-09-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On September 8, the Senate approved the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249) without amendment, by an 89-9 vote, sending the measure to President Obama for his signature. The vote marks the end to a six-year effort to overhaul the patent system ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2642202&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Brevetti: dal Senato Usa via libera alla riforma per accelerare l&amp;#39;approvazione ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.key4biz.it/News/2011/09/12/Policy/brevetti_apple_google_us_patent_office_205228.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-12:/commentary/11281609</id>
    <updated>2011-09-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Key4biz (Abbonamento)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Il testo dell&amp;#39;&#8220;America Invents Act&#8221; (HR 1249) - adottato con 89 voti favorevoli e 9 contrari - dovr&#224; essere firmato dal Presidente Barack Obama. Era sbarcato per la prima volta al Congresso nel 2005 ea giugno era stato approvato dalla Camera. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.key4biz.it/News/2011/09/12/Policy/brevetti_apple_google_us_patent_office_205228.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Recapping Last Week in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.congressmatters.com/story/2011/9/12/2810/-This-Week-in-Congress" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-12:/commentary/11281608</id>
    <updated>2011-09-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Congress Matters</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 This week&amp;#39;s product was HR 1249, the &amp;quot;America Invents Act,&amp;quot; a/k/a the patent reform bill. None of the offered amendments passed, so with the bill&amp;#39;s passage in the Senate, the bill should shortly be on its way to the President. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.congressmatters.com/story/2011/9/12/2810/-This-Week-in-Congress&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Smart Balance, Apple, Summit, Righthaven: Intellectual Property</title>
    <link href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-12/smart-balance-apple-summit-righthaven-intellectual-property.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-12:/commentary/11281607</id>
    <updated>2011-09-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bloomberg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The legislation, HR 1249, would let the US Patent and Trademark Office set its own fees and exercise greater control over its budget, providing the agency with more funding to address a backlog of almost 700000 applications awaiting first review. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-12/smart-balance-apple-summit-righthaven-intellectual-property.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reaction to Senate Passage of HR 1249</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/09/reaction-to-senate-passage-of-hr-1249.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-12:/commentary/11280137</id>
    <updated>2011-09-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On Thursday, the Senate passed the House version of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249) by an 89-9 vote (see &amp;quot;Senate Passes HR 1249&amp;quot;). The legislation now awaits the President&amp;#39;s signature before becoming law. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/09/reaction-to-senate-passage-of-hr-1249.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Foley &amp;amp; Lardner LLP | Wednesday Webinar: The 2011 Patent Law, Commissioner ...</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2631363" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-11:/commentary/11312459</id>
    <updated>2011-09-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On September 8, 2011, by a vote of 89-9, the Senate approved the House version of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249), leaving only President Obama&amp;#39;s signature as the final step to make patent reform a reality (he has already stated he is ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2631363&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>US Senate passes patent reform bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.eetasia.com/ART_8800651153_480100_NT_cde61044.HTM" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-11:/commentary/11312436</id>
    <updated>2011-09-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Eetasia.com (subscription)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House has already approved HR 1249 by a vote of 304 to 117 last June. After a decade of debate, President Obama will sign into law the controversial bill. The final bill shifts the US from a first-to-invent to a first-to-file standard in an effort ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eetasia.com/ART_8800651153_480100_NT_cde61044.HTM&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pending patent reform unlikely to untangle software litigation mess</title>
    <link href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/service-oriented/pending-patent-reform-unlikely-to-untangle-software-litigation-mess/7663" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-11:/commentary/11312434</id>
    <updated>2011-09-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ZDNet (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Leahy-Smith &#8220;America Invents Act&#8221; (HR 1249) was recently approved in a US Senate vote, and awaits the president&amp;#39;s signature. Patents have long been both the bedrock and bane of software innovation, ensuring that creators will be properly ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zdnet.com/blog/service-oriented/pending-patent-reform-unlikely-to-untangle-software-litigation-mess/7663&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IBM Applauds Final Passage of Patent Reform Legislation</title>
    <link href="http://www.iewy.com/33516-ibm-applauds-final-passage-of-patent-reform-legislation.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-11:/commentary/11278730</id>
    <updated>2011-09-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IEWY News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 ARMONK, NY: IBM (NYSE: IBM) today commended the US Senate and House of Representatives for passing The America Invents Act (HR 1249) patent reform legislation, which will help spur American innovation, stimulate economic growth. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iewy.com/33516-ibm-applauds-final-passage-of-patent-reform-legislation.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How your US Lawmaker voted</title>
    <link href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2016171819_rollcall11.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-11:/commentary/11277441</id>
    <updated>2011-09-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Seattle Times</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 By a vote of 89-9, the Senate on Thursday sent President Obama a bill (HR 1249) to help the United States Patent and Trademark Office reduce its backlog of 700000 applications and shorten the 34-months&amp;#39; average time for processing applications. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2016171819_rollcall11.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How they voted (Sept. 11)</title>
    <link href="http://www.lcsun-news.com/las_cruces-news/ci_18871599" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-11:/commentary/11277440</id>
    <updated>2011-09-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Las Cruces Sun-News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &#8226;HR 1249 A bill to amend title 35, United States Code, to provide for patent reform. (Passed 89-9) Jeff Bingaman yes, Tom Udall yes. SJ RES 25 Motion to proceed to the consideration of SJRes. 25; a joint resolution relating to the disapproval of the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lcsun-news.com/las_cruces-news/ci_18871599&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How they voted</title>
    <link href="http://posttrib.suntimes.com/news/7573623-418/how-they-voted.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-11:/commentary/11277439</id>
    <updated>2011-09-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Post-Tribune</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 PATENT REFORM DEBATE: The Senate approved a cloture motion to cut off debate on the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249), sponsored by Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas. The bill would introduce a first-to-file system for reviewing patent claims, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://posttrib.suntimes.com/news/7573623-418/how-they-voted.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Voterama for Sept. 15</title>
    <link href="http://lincolnshire.suntimes.com/news/7564311-418/voterama-for-sept-15.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-10:/commentary/11326736</id>
    <updated>2011-09-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lincolnshire Review</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 A yes vote was to pass HR 1249. Patent-Fee Dispute: Senators killed, 50-48, a bid to remove patent-fee revenue from the appropriations process so it could not be spent as general revenue. A yes vote backed the softer of two pending measures to prevent ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lincolnshire.suntimes.com/news/7564311-418/voterama-for-sept-15.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Statement of USPTO Director Following Final Senate Passage of Leahy-Smith ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.ag-ip-news.com/news.aspx?id=27823&amp;amp;lang=en" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-10:/commentary/11312435</id>
    <updated>2011-09-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ag-IP-news Agency</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 WASHINGTON - &#8220;I want to congratulate the United States Senate for passing the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249) today [September 8, 2011], and again thank Senate and House Judiciary Chairmen Leahy and Smith, as well as House and Senate ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ag-ip-news.com/news.aspx?id=27823&amp;amp;lang=en&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patents Directed to Human Organisms</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/09/patents-directed-to-human-organisms.html?cid=6a00d8341c588553ef0154354ff220970c" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-10:/commentary/11287717</id>
    <updated>2011-09-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patently-O</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 A major problem with the soon-to-be-enacted patent reform act (HR 1249) is that its poor wording inevitably leads to uncertainty about how the law will be interpreted by the courts and by the patent office (USPTO). And, that uncertainty potentially ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/09/patents-directed-to-human-organisms.html?cid=6a00d8341c588553ef0154354ff220970c&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Web Conference on Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/09/web-conference-on-patent-reform.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-10:/commentary/11269877</id>
    <updated>2011-09-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The panel will address the House version of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249), which was passed by the Senate on Thursday, and decipher practical implications of key provisions, various retroactive and prospective deadlines, and recommended ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/09/web-conference-on-patent-reform.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp;amp; Feld LLP | U.S. Senate Sends Patent Reform ...</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2623701" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-09:/commentary/11368767</id>
    <updated>2011-09-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On September 8, 2011, the US Senate passed HR 1249, the &#8220;Leahy-Smith America Invents Act,&#8221; by a bi-partisan vote of 89-9. Because the Senate passed the bill in the same form passed by the US House of Representatives in June, without amendment, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2623701&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate passes biggest patent overhaul since 1952</title>
    <link href="http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2011/09/09/senate-passes-biggest-patent-overhaul-since-1952/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-09:/commentary/11368625</id>
    <updated>2011-09-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Missouri Lawyers Media (subscription) (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The legislation, HR 1249, would let the US Patent and Trademark Office set its own fees and exercise greater control over its budget, providing the agency with more funding to address a backlog of almost 700000 applications awaiting first review. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2011/09/09/senate-passes-biggest-patent-overhaul-since-1952/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Approves Patent Reform Bill</title>
    <link href="http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/89/i37/8937news1.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-09:/commentary/11368361</id>
    <updated>2011-09-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical &amp;amp; Engineering News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Senate&amp;#39;s 89-9 bipartisan vote sends the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249) to the White House where it is expected to be signed into law shortly by President Barack Obama, who strongly supports the measure. &amp;quot;Today you passed reform tha&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/89/i37/8937news1.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Passes the Senate with Teeth, Heart Missing</title>
    <link href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/enterprise/2011/09/patent-reform-passes-the-senat.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-09:/commentary/11359699</id>
    <updated>2011-09-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ReadWriteWeb</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Yesterday, the US Senate passed the House&amp;#39;s version of the latest patent reform bill, HR 1249, the America Invents Act, by a vote of 89 to 9. During a speech to Congress yesterday, Pres. Obama praised the Senate for that action, and vowed to sign the &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readwriteweb.com/enterprise/2011/09/patent-reform-passes-the-senat.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Statement from AICPA President and CEO Barry Melancon Praising Final ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.sacbee.com/2011/09/08/3895060/statement-from-aicpa-president.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-09:/commentary/11287721</id>
    <updated>2011-09-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sacramento Bee</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &amp;quot;The Senate&amp;#39;s overwhelming passage today of HR 1249, the America Invents Act, will stop the issuance of tax strategy patents and help protect taxpayers from lawsuits, royalties, and increasingly complicated tax compliance requirements. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacbee.com/2011/09/08/3895060/statement-from-aicpa-president.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IBM Applauds Final Passage of Patent Reform Legislation</title>
    <link href="http://www.sacbee.com/2011/09/08/3895064/ibm-applauds-final-passage-of.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-09:/commentary/11287720</id>
    <updated>2011-09-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sacramento Bee</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 8, 2011 -- /PRNewswire/ -- IBM (NYSE: IBM) today commended the US Senate and House of Representatives for passing The America Invents Act (HR 1249) patent reform legislation, which will help spur American innovation, stimulate economic growth. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacbee.com/2011/09/08/3895064/ibm-applauds-final-passage-of.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &amp;amp; Dunner, LLP | Senate Approves Leahy ...</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2622452" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-09:/commentary/11271467</id>
    <updated>2011-09-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The US Senate voted by a margin of 89 to 9 on September 8, 2011, to reform US patent laws by approving the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, with identical provisions to HR 1249, which was approved by the House of Representatives on June 23, 2011. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2622452&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &amp;amp; Dunner, LLP | Patent Reform Bill ...</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2622451" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-09:/commentary/11269878</id>
    <updated>2011-09-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On September 8, 2011, the Senate gave final approval to HR 1249, the House version of legislation known as the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act without adding any amendments. When signed into law by President Obama, the bill will shift the US to a ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2622451&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Voterama for Sept. 15</title>
    <link href="http://highlandpark.suntimes.com/news/7564311-418/voterama-for-sept-15.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-09:/commentary/11269876</id>
    <updated>2011-09-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Highland Park News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 A yes vote was to pass HR 1249. Patent-Fee Dispute: Senators killed, 50-48, a bid to remove patent-fee revenue from the appropriations process so it could not be spent as general revenue. A yes vote backed the softer of two pending measures to prevent ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://highlandpark.suntimes.com/news/7564311-418/voterama-for-sept-15.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patents Directed to Human Organisms</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/09/patents-directed-to-human-organisms.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-09:/commentary/11269875</id>
    <updated>2011-09-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patently-O</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 A major problem with the soon-to-be-enacted patent reform act (HR 1249) is that its poor wording inevitably leads to uncertainty about how the law will be interpreted by the courts and by the patent office (USPTO). And, that uncertainty potentially ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/09/patents-directed-to-human-organisms.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>US Business &amp; Industry Council (USBIC) Briefing on America Invents Act</title>
    <link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PatentBaristas/~3/foMjlnLYXEc/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-09:/commentary/11268880</id>
    <updated>2011-09-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...9/6/11, US Business &amp; Industry Council (USBIC) arranged a briefing for Senate staff about the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R.1249)(formerly known as the Patent Reform Act of 2011). This briefing&#8217;s purpose was to make the Senate aware of many of &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PatentBaristas/~3/foMjlnLYXEc/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress Passes Tax Patent Reform; Sends Bill to President</title>
    <link href="http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/Web/20114565.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-08:/commentary/11359554</id>
    <updated>2011-09-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Journal of Accountancy</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On Thursday evening, the Senate passed the America Invents Act (HR 1249) by a vote of 89&#8211;9. The Senate&amp;#39;s version of the bill was identical to one passed by the House of Representatives in June, and it now goes to President Barack Obama for his ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/Web/20114565.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Votes 89-9 to Pass Patent Reform, No End to Fee Diversion</title>
    <link href="http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/08/senate-votes-89-9-to-pass-patent-reform-no-end-to-fee-diversion/id=19054/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-08:/commentary/11358744</id>
    <updated>2011-09-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPWatchdog.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 It looks like my prediction on Tuesday that the Senate would pass HR 1249, the America Invents Act, prior to President Obama&amp;#39;s much anticipated jobs and economy speech that begins at 7:00pm ET today, Thursday, September 8, 2011. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/08/senate-votes-89-9-to-pass-patent-reform-no-end-to-fee-diversion/id=19054/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>At long last, kickoff Thursday</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=11c4133e-b1e6-494f-958a-d4947290e71e" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-08:/commentary/11287723</id>
    <updated>2011-09-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 announced yesterday that the Senate will hold a vote on final passage of HR 1249 (Leahy-Smith America Invents Act) at 4PM today. While there has been a discussion of amending the bill, which will be discussed prior to the 4PM vote, Senate leadership ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=11c4133e-b1e6-494f-958a-d4947290e71e&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&#8220;Pulse of the IP Industry&#8221; Survey Conducted by General Patent Corporation ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110908006050/en/%E2%80%9CPulse-IP-Industry%E2%80%9D-Survey-Conducted-General-Patent" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-08:/commentary/11271468</id>
    <updated>2011-09-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Business Wire (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 SUFFERN, NY--(BUSINESS WIRE)--A significant majority of the innovators, entrepreneurs and patent professionals who participated in the &#8220;Pulse of the IP Industry&#8221; Survey view key elements of the &#8220;America Invents Act&#8221; (HR 1249) unfavorably! ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110908006050/en/%E2%80%9CPulse-IP-Industry%E2%80%9D-Survey-Conducted-General-Patent&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Senator Ate My Butt-Saving Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/09/08/the-senator-ate-my-butt-saving-bill/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-08:/commentary/11267103</id>
    <updated>2011-09-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, HR 1249, which passed the House in June by 304-117 in June, contains a provision to amend 35 USC 156, the statute governing patent term extensions. &amp;#39;For purposes of determining the date on which a ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/09/08/the-senator-ate-my-butt-saving-bill/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate passes bill to overhaul patent system</title>
    <link href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/44439509" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-08:/commentary/11267075</id>
    <updated>2011-09-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CNBC.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 ... bill that will significantly improve the US patent system.&amp;quot; IBM has been the top US patent recipient for the last 18 years. ___ Online: US Patent and Trademark Office: http://www.uspto.gov/ HR 1249, the America Invents Act: http://tinyurl.com/3tw&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnbc.com/id/44439509&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Statement from AICPA President and CEO Barry Melancon Praising Final ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/415016" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-08:/commentary/11267074</id>
    <updated>2011-09-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DigitalJournal.com (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &amp;quot;The Senate&amp;#39;s overwhelming passage today of HR 1249, the America Invents Act, will stop the issuance of tax strategy patents and help protect taxpayers from lawsuits, royalties, and increasingly complicated tax compliance requirements. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/415016&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Potential upcoming changes to business method and software patents America ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=3f550028-5215-4831-9591-9bf0619260d2" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-08:/commentary/11267073</id>
    <updated>2011-09-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Many observers believe that the version of the bill to be signed by President Obama will closely resemble HR 1249, which was passed by the House of Representatives on June 23, 2011. If enacted, Section 18 of HR 1249 would establish a &#8220;transitional ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=3f550028-5215-4831-9591-9bf0619260d2&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Thursday: Charter schools, patent reform, and preparing for Obama</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/180145-thursday-charter-schools-patent-reform-and-preparing-for-obama" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-08:/commentary/11267072</id>
    <updated>2011-09-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Senate meets at 9:30 am, and after morning speeches will take up HR 1249, the patent reform bill titled the America Invents Act. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Wednesday that the Senate would hold a final vote on this bill today, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/180145-thursday-charter-schools-patent-reform-and-preparing-for-obama&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Foley &amp;amp; Lardner LLP | Leahy Smith America Invents Act, H.R. 1249: Final Senate ...</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2609067" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-08:/commentary/11267071</id>
    <updated>2011-09-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 If all Amendments are defeated: If all three amendments [(1)-(3)] are defeated and if the bill passes [(4)], this will be the final legislative act necessary for enactment of the patent bill. If any Amendment is Adopted: If any of the three amendments ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2609067&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Effects of the America Invents Act on Technological Disclosure</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/09/the-effects-of-the-america-invents-act-on-technological-disclosure.html?cid=6a00d8341c588553ef0153916fae0a970b" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-08:/commentary/11267070</id>
    <updated>2011-09-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patently-O</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 (Note: Given the almost certain passage of HR 1249 by the Senate, this analysis refers to that version of the pending patent legislation. It is available here.). The principal justification for the impending changes to patent law is ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/09/the-effects-of-the-america-invents-act-on-technological-disclosure.html?cid=6a00d8341c588553ef0153916fae0a970b&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Passes HR 1249</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/09/senate-passes-hr-1249.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-08:/commentary/11267069</id>
    <updated>2011-09-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 After considering three amendments, rejecting two and tabling a third, the Senate today voted 89 to 9 in favor of HR 1249, the House version of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. While proponents of the bill secured a wide margin in favor of passage ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/09/senate-passes-hr-1249.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Today in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.dailykos.com/~r/dailykos/index/~3/5EeZesZ6zZM/-Today-in-Congress" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-08:/commentary/11265934</id>
    <updated>2011-09-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Kos</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...details of the agreement are below. The following amendments are the only first degree amendments in order to H.R.1249: Sessions #600(strike Section 37 regarding patent term extensions); and Cantwell #595 (transitional program for covered business metho&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.dailykos.com/~r/dailykos/index/~3/5EeZesZ6zZM/-Today-in-Congress&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Some Hope for the Patent Reforms</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/09/by-dennis-crouch-at-this-point-it-appears-very-likely-that-the-leahy-smith-america-invents-act-hr-1249-will-become-law-a.html?cid=6a00d8341c588553ef015435398f17970c" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-07:/commentary/11269874</id>
    <updated>2011-09-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patently-O</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Patent Law Persists: At this point, it appears very likely that the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249) will become law later this month. In my patent law course yesterday, we discussed some details of the proposal and ultimately ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/09/by-dennis-crouch-at-this-point-it-appears-very-likely-that-the-leahy-smith-america-invents-act-hr-1249-will-become-law-a.html?cid=6a00d8341c588553ef015435398f17970c&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pressing the patent reform panic button</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=8ad3cdf4-82e0-479e-a46b-362d48446f05" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-07:/commentary/11264446</id>
    <updated>2011-09-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Rumor has it that the Senate will vote on the House Patent Reform bill (HR 1249) this week. The Senate is scheduled to vote on the procedural issue of &amp;quot;cloture&amp;quot; on the bill in its first roll call session on Tuesday, September 6, 2011 at 5:30 pm.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=8ad3cdf4-82e0-479e-a46b-362d48446f05&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Moves Forward on Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress/senate-moves-forward-on-patent-reform-20110906" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-07:/commentary/11264430</id>
    <updated>2011-09-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>National Journal</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Ahead of the key vote, Senate leaders urged members to fall in line and quickly approve the America Invents Act (HR 1249), which has been trumpeted by supporters as a way to help businesses create more jobs. The Senate is considering changes made to ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress/senate-moves-forward-on-patent-reform-20110906&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate vote advances patent reform to final hurdle</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=57f07e34-97c6-45f7-a7c8-4b358e6afac9" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-07:/commentary/11264429</id>
    <updated>2011-09-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On September 6, 2011, in its second item of business after its August break, the United States Senate approved a procedural motion to invoke &amp;quot;cloture&amp;quot; on the House patent reform bill (HR 1249). This vote spares patent reform from any filibuster,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=57f07e34-97c6-45f7-a7c8-4b358e6afac9&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Today in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/09/07/1014121/-Today-in-Congress" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-07:/commentary/11264427</id>
    <updated>2011-09-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Kos</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On the Nomination (Confirmation Bernice Bouie Donald, of Tennessee, to be US Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit ). Nomination Confirmed, 96-2. On the Cloture Motion (Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to HR 1249 ). ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/09/07/1014121/-Today-in-Congress&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Wednesday: Trade in the House, patent reform in the Senate</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/179837-wednesday-trade-in-the-house-patent-reform-in-the-senate" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-07:/commentary/11264426</id>
    <updated>2011-09-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Senate meets at 10 am, and after morning speeches starts debate on the America Invents Act, HR 1249. The Senate on Tuesday evening voted 93-5 to end debate on the motion to proceed to the bill, a likely sign the bill has enough support to pass in ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/179837-wednesday-trade-in-the-house-patent-reform-in-the-senate&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent bill clears another procedural hurdle in Senate</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/179991-patent-bill-clears-another-procedural-hurdle-in-senate" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-07:/commentary/11264424</id>
    <updated>2011-09-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Patent Reform legislation now pending before the upper chamber &#8212; also called the America Invents Act, HR 1249 &#8212; would change the US from a first-to-invent to a first-to-file patent system, a move proponents say would bring the US patent system ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/179991-patent-bill-clears-another-procedural-hurdle-in-senate&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Fee Dispute Is Last Hurdle for Patent Overhaul Bill</title>
    <link href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/07/fee-dispute-is-last-hurdle-for-patent-overhaul-bill/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-07:/commentary/11264423</id>
    <updated>2011-09-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>New York Times (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House, however, passed a different bill, HR 1249, which would put excess funds &#8211; those above the patent office&amp;#39;s annual budget &#8211; into a sort of lockbox that could be used only with Congressional approval. Now, the Senate is taking up the House&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/07/fee-dispute-is-last-hurdle-for-patent-overhaul-bill/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Will Force Sequential, Broader Patent Application Filings by New ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.bna.com/patent-reform-force-n12884903359/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-07:/commentary/11264422</id>
    <updated>2011-09-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Bureau of National Affairs (BNA)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The likely enactment of the patent reform bill, HR 1249, in September will force individual inventors and small businesses to file a series of patent applications upon each new invention enablement and build a patent portfolio rather than relying on a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bna.com/patent-reform-force-n12884903359/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Today in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.dailykos.com/~r/dailykos/index/~3/T0w3_j3lbu4/-Today-in-Congress" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-07:/commentary/11262662</id>
    <updated>2011-09-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Kos</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...controlling the final half. Following morning business, the Senate will resume consideration of the motion to proceed to H.R.1249, the America Invents Act. The Senate will recess from 12:30pm until 2:15pm to allow for the weekly caucus meetings. At 2:30&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.dailykos.com/~r/dailykos/index/~3/T0w3_j3lbu4/-Today-in-Congress&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Votes to Invoke Cloture on HR 1249</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/09/senate-votes-to-invoke-cloture-on-hr-1249.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-07:/commentary/11262264</id>
    <updated>2011-09-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Earlier today, the Senate voted 93-5 to invoke cloture on a motion to proceed to HR 1249, the House version of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. Opposing the motion were Senators Tom Coburn (R-OK), Jim DeMint (R-SC), ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/09/senate-votes-to-invoke-cloture-on-hr-1249.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Microsoft makes big push for changes in patent law</title>
    <link href="http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2011/09/06/microsoft-makes-big-push-for-changes.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-06:/commentary/11271469</id>
    <updated>2011-09-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bizjournals.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Microsoft also supports the act because it sets up review procedures that Gutierrez said could &#8220;help eliminate questionable patent&#8221; approvals: &#8220;HR 1249&amp;#39;s reforms in these areas will ensure that innovators in our troubled economy can benefit from&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2011/09/06/microsoft-makes-big-push-for-changes.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate votes to take up patent reform</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/179755-senate-votes-to-take-up-patent-reform-" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-06:/commentary/11264428</id>
    <updated>2011-09-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 If cleared by the Senate and signed by Obama, the America Invents Act, HR 1249, would change the US from a first-to-invent to a first-inventor-to-file patent system, a move proponents say would bring the US patent system closer to systems already used ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/179755-senate-votes-to-take-up-patent-reform-&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RIM, Apple-Samsung, S3, Location-Based Programs: Intellectual Property</title>
    <link href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-07/rim-apple-location-based-programs-intellectual-property.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-06:/commentary/11264425</id>
    <updated>2011-09-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bloomberg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Yesterday&amp;#39;s action moves the Senate closer to passing HR 1249, which would overhaul present law by granting patents to the first to file, rather than the first to invent. The legislation would also allow the US Patent and Trademark Office to control .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-07/rim-apple-location-based-programs-intellectual-property.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress After the August Recess: A Look Ahead</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/144530/Public+Finance/Congress+After+the+August+Recess+A+Look+Ahead" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-06:/commentary/11262265</id>
    <updated>2011-09-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq News Alerts (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Senate&amp;#39;s first votes are expected to be a vote that evening on whether to end debate on a motion to proceed to the Patent Reform Act of 2011 (HR 1249) and a vote on an appellate court nomination. The following outlines those issues that Congress i&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/144530/Public+Finance/Congress+After+the+August+Recess+A+Look+Ahead&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>This Week in Washington &#8211; September 6, 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.redstate.com/brian_d/2011/09/06/this-week-in-washington-september-6-2011/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-06:/commentary/11259361</id>
    <updated>2011-09-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>RedState</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On Tuesday, the Senate will vote on a motion to proceed to HR 1249, the controversial Patent Reform bill, after voting on the nomination of Bernice Bouie Donald, of Tennessee, to be US Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit (Calendar No. 109). ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/brian_d/2011/09/06/this-week-in-washington-september-6-2011/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Votes 93-5 to End Debate on Patent Reform, Vote Imminent</title>
    <link href="http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/06/senate-votes-93-5-to-end-debate-on-patent-reform-vote-imminent/id=19023/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-06:/commentary/11259360</id>
    <updated>2011-09-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPWatchdog.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The United States Senate voted 93 to 5 earlier this evening to end debate on patent reform, which should set up a vote on HR 1249 in the coming days. The United States Senate first passed its own version of patent reform, dubbed the America Invents Act ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/06/senate-votes-93-5-to-end-debate-on-patent-reform-vote-imminent/id=19023/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Foley &amp;amp; Lardner LLP | &amp;quot;Cloture&amp;quot; Tomorrow? The Most Important Patent Vote in ...</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2587755" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-06:/commentary/11259353</id>
    <updated>2011-09-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 ... a &amp;quot;cloture&amp;quot; vote will be taken as the second order of business. The Senate will take a procedural vote to invoke &amp;quot;cloture&amp;quot; which would permit expedited consideration of and later a merits vote on Leahy Smith America Invents Act, HR&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2587755&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reid opens Senate with attack on Republicans for blocking jobs legislation</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/179671-reid-opens-senate-with-attack-on-republicans-for-blocking-jobs-legislation-" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-06:/commentary/11259352</id>
    <updated>2011-09-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In his opening speech Reid also confirmed there will be a vote on the confirmation of Bernice Bouie Donald to be a US Circuit Judge for the 6th Circuit Tuesday afternoon as well as a procedural vote on The America Invents Act or HR 1249. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/179671-reid-opens-senate-with-attack-on-republicans-for-blocking-jobs-legislation-&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cloture Vote on Patent Reform Act; Public Collectively Reaches for Dictionary</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/09/06/cloture-vote-on-patent-reform-act-public-collectively-reaches-for-dictionary/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-06:/commentary/11259350</id>
    <updated>2011-09-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, HR 1249 passed the House in June by 304-117, in June. Now, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has filed for cloture on the patent reform bill, setting up a vote today. The Senate is scheduled to vote on the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/09/06/cloture-vote-on-patent-reform-act-public-collectively-reaches-for-dictionary/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Today in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.dailykos.com/~r/dailykos/index/~3/PwapWj7c1MI/-Today-in-Congress" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-06:/commentary/11258282</id>
    <updated>2011-09-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Kos</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...roll call vote will be on confirmation of the Donald nomination. The 2nd will be a cloture vote on the motion to proceed to H.R.1249, the Patent Reform bill. You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it. A tag is a way to search for &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.dailykos.com/~r/dailykos/index/~3/PwapWj7c1MI/-Today-in-Congress&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Set to Enact Patent Reform Along the Lines of House Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.genengnews.com/analysis-and-insight/senate-set-to-enact-patent-reform-along-the-lines-of-house-bill/77899452/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-06:/commentary/11257768</id>
    <updated>2011-09-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Genetic Engineering News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The bill to be taken up by the Senate is word for word from HR 1249, the patent reform measure passed by the House of Representatives on June 23. Last year, the House used a similar maneuver when its then-Democratic leadership persuaded a bare majority ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.genengnews.com/analysis-and-insight/senate-set-to-enact-patent-reform-along-the-lines-of-house-bill/77899452/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Cloture Vote on HR 1249 Scheduled for Tuesday</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/09/senate-cloture-vote-on-hr-1249-.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-06:/commentary/11257767</id>
    <updated>2011-09-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Tomorrow, the Senate will vote to invoke cloture on a motion to proceed to HR 1249, the House version of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. The vote to invoke cloture is scheduled to take place immediately after the Senate considers ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/09/senate-cloture-vote-on-hr-1249-.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Set to Enact Patent Reform Along the Lines of House Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.genengnews.com/keywordsandtools/print/3/24159/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-05:/commentary/11264431</id>
    <updated>2011-09-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Genetic Engineering News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The bill to be taken up by the Senate is word for word from HR 1249, the patent reform measure passed by the House of Representatives on June 23. Last year, the House used a similar maneuver when its then-Democratic leadership persuaded a bare majority ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.genengnews.com/keywordsandtools/print/3/24159/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congreso regresa con cargada agenda</title>
    <link href="http://www.impre.com/laraza/noticias/nacionales/2011/9/4/congreso-regresa-con-cargada-a-270598-1.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-05:/commentary/11259354</id>
    <updated>2011-09-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>La Raza</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Por parte del Senado, ya est&#225; programado un voto para confirmar a la juez Bernice Bouie y luego se someter&#225; a cierre de debate el proyecto de ley sobre reforma de patentes HR 1249. La legislaci&#243;n permitir&#237;a a la Oficina de Patentes de Estados Unidos .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.impre.com/laraza/noticias/nacionales/2011/9/4/congreso-regresa-con-cargada-a-270598-1.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dispatch from the Front: The Week of September 5</title>
    <link href="http://shopfloor.org/2011/09/dispatch-from-the-front-the-week-of-september-5/22403" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-05:/commentary/11259351</id>
    <updated>2011-09-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Shopfloor</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 (HR 1249). The House convenes on Wednesday and will vote on three bills that evening, including on relating to trade, including HR 2832, which would extend the Generalized System of Preferences. For more on the House&amp;#39;s week, see the Majority Leader&amp;#3&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://shopfloor.org/2011/09/dispatch-from-the-front-the-week-of-september-5/22403&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The week ahead on the Hill: A high-stakes jobs battle on the horizon</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/the-week-ahead-on-the-hill-a-high-stakes-jobs-battle-on-the-horizon/2011/09/05/gIQA1fDN4J_blog.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-05:/commentary/11257070</id>
    <updated>2011-09-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Washington Post (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 At 5 pm, members will begin 30 minutes of debate on the nomination of Bernice Donald to serve as US circuit judge, with a vote expected at 5:30 pm A roll call vote on ending debate on HR 1249, the Patent Reform Bill, is expected to follow. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/the-week-ahead-on-the-hill-a-high-stakes-jobs-battle-on-the-horizon/2011/09/05/gIQA1fDN4J_blog.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>This Week in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.dailykos.com/~r/dailykos/index/~3/6lddySeenQk/-This-Week-in-Congress" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-05:/commentary/11257065</id>
    <updated>2011-09-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Kos</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...and Grassley. The next roll call votes will be at 5:30pm on Tuesday, September 6th. &#160;The first roll call vote will be on confirmation of the Donald nomination. &#160;The 2nd will be a cloture vote on the motion &#160;to proceed to H.R.1249, the Patent Reform b&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.dailykos.com/~r/dailykos/index/~3/6lddySeenQk/-This-Week-in-Congress&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congreso regresa con cargada agenda</title>
    <link href="http://www.impre.com/laopinion/noticias/estados-unidos/2011/9/4/congreso-regresa-con-cargada-a-270598-1.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-04:/commentary/11254837</id>
    <updated>2011-09-04T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>La Opini&amp;oacute;n</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Por parte del Senado, ya est&#225; programado un voto para confirmar a la juez Bernice Bouie y luego se someter&#225; a cierre de debate el proyecto de ley sobre reforma de patentes HR 1249. La legislaci&#243;n permitir&#237;a a la Oficina de Patentes de Estados Unidos .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.impre.com/laopinion/noticias/estados-unidos/2011/9/4/congreso-regresa-con-cargada-a-270598-1.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform: Post Grant Review Musings</title>
    <link href="http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/04/patent-reform-post-grant-review-musings/id=18981/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-04:/commentary/11254836</id>
    <updated>2011-09-04T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPWatchdog.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Then in June the House of Representatives passed its version of the America Invents Act &#8211; HR 1249 &#8211; by a vote of 304 &#8211; 117. The House version was not identical to the Senate version, hence the need for the Senate to vote again. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/04/patent-reform-post-grant-review-musings/id=18981/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Law Analysis by Professors Dennis Crouch and Jason Rantanen</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/09/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-02:/commentary/11248797</id>
    <updated>2011-09-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patently-O</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 HR 1249 and S. 23. The two bills have some minor differences &#8212; the primary difference probably being that the Senate version does a better job of solidifying PTO funding. Rather than negotiate a compromise bill in conference, Senate leadership has ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/09/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform 2011: Vote Scheduled At the Conclusion of Labor Day</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/09/patent-reform-2011-vote-scheduled-at-the-conclusion-of-labor-day.html?cid=6a00d8341c588553ef014e8b33b47a970d" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-02:/commentary/11248780</id>
    <updated>2011-09-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patently-O</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 HR 1249 and S. 23. The two bills have some minor differences &#8212; the primary difference probably being that the Senate version does a better job of solidifying PTO funding. Rather than negotiate a compromise bill in conference, Senate leadership has ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/09/patent-reform-2011-vote-scheduled-at-the-conclusion-of-labor-day.html?cid=6a00d8341c588553ef014e8b33b47a970d&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Trabajo acumulado espera a Congreso</title>
    <link href="http://www.impre.com/laopinion/noticias/2011/9/2/trabajo-acumulado-espera-a-con-270381-1.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-02:/commentary/11246956</id>
    <updated>2011-09-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>La Opini&amp;oacute;n</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Por parte del Senado, ya est&#225; programado un voto para confirmar a la juez Bernice Bouie y luego se someter&#225; a cierre de debate el proyecto de ley sobre reforma de patentes HR 1249. La legislaci&#243;n permitir&#237;a a la Oficina de Patentes de Estados Unidos .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.impre.com/laopinion/noticias/2011/9/2/trabajo-acumulado-espera-a-con-270381-1.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform: One Giant Step Backwards?</title>
    <link href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202513148515&amp;amp;Are_We_Taking_a_Giant_Step_Backwards_for_Patent_Reform" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-01:/commentary/11287722</id>
    <updated>2011-09-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Corporate Counsel</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The words aptly apply to the ineptly titled &amp;quot;America Invents Act,&amp;quot; S. 23 and HR 1249, currently meandering through Congress. Perhaps President Barack Obama is preparing for the day when he can sign the bill into law. That day is likely to bring &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202513148515&amp;amp;Are_We_Taking_a_Giant_Step_Backwards_for_Patent_Reform&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform: One Giant Step Backwards?</title>
    <link href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202513148515&amp;amp;Patent_Reform_One_Giant_Step_Backwards" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-01:/commentary/11248781</id>
    <updated>2011-09-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Law Journal</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The words aptly apply to the ineptly titled &amp;quot;America Invents Act,&amp;quot; S. 23 and HR 1249, currently meandering through Congress. Perhaps President Barack Obama is preparing for the day when he can sign the bill into law. That day is likely to bring &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202513148515&amp;amp;Patent_Reform_One_Giant_Step_Backwards&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SNR Denton | Update: Patent Reform Progresses in the 112th Congress</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2558622" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-01:/commentary/11242873</id>
    <updated>2011-09-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) will bring HR 1249, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, to the Senate floor for consideration later this month. HR 1249 passed the House of Representatives on June 23, 2011, by a vote of 304-117. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2558622&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IP Update - Patent Law Reform 2011 - August 31, 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=17f1a2b9-1331-44cc-931d-c4669461d8e5" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-09-01:/commentary/11242872</id>
    <updated>2011-09-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>JD Supra (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The US House of Representatives voted by a margin of 304 to 117 on June 23, 2011, to reform US patent laws by approving the America Invents Act (HR 1249). This vote follows approval in the US Senate of very similar legislation (S. 23) on March 8, 2011. ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=17f1a2b9-1331-44cc-931d-c4669461d8e5&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SNR Denton | Congress After the August Recess: A Look Ahead</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2549040" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-31:/commentary/11241324</id>
    <updated>2011-08-31T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Senate&amp;#39;s first votes are expected to be a vote that evening on whether to end debate on a motion to proceed to the Patent Reform Act of 2011 (HR 1249) and a vote on an appellate court nomination. The following outlines those issues that Congress i&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2549040&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform: One giant step backwards?</title>
    <link href="http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202513022249&amp;amp;Patent_reform_One_giant_step_backwards" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-31:/commentary/11241323</id>
    <updated>2011-08-31T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Law Journal</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The words aptly apply to the ineptly titled &amp;quot;America Invents Act,&amp;quot; S. 23 and HR 1249, currently meandering through Congress. Perhaps President Barack Obama is preparing for the day when he can sign the bill into law. That day is likely to bring &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202513022249&amp;amp;Patent_reform_One_giant_step_backwards&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Act Threatens &amp;#39;Engine&amp;#39; of Prosperity</title>
    <link href="http://biggovernment.com/bmccarty/2011/08/30/patent-reform-act-threatens-engine-of-prosperity/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-30:/commentary/11236534</id>
    <updated>2011-08-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Big Government</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 When the Senate returns from its August recess, the members will be asked to end a filibuster against passage of HR 1249, the Smith-Leahy Patent Reform Act of 2011. It is essentially the same bill that we defeated in 1997 and it deserves the same fate. ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://biggovernment.com/bmccarty/2011/08/30/patent-reform-act-threatens-engine-of-prosperity/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Another Obama/Reid Job killing legislation.</title>
    <link href="http://community.mantecabulletin.com/blogs/detail/2655/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-27:/commentary/11228819</id>
    <updated>2011-08-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Manteca Bulletin (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 by Therightchange It&amp;#39;s known as &#8221;patent reform&#8221; (HR 1249/SB 23) and it&amp;#39;s anything but reform with it&amp;#39;s current Section 18 intact. It&amp;#39;s a bald-faced sellout to Big Banking and Wall Street. There are several difficulties with the bill, b&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://community.mantecabulletin.com/blogs/detail/2655/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Inter partes patent reexamination standard to tighten in 30 days</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7d3bb63f-2742-4f4f-86c7-da6479c49a8d" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-25:/commentary/11221297</id>
    <updated>2011-08-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 (See 6(c)(3)(C) of HR 1249; current Section 312 would apply between the date of enactment and the 1 year anniversary, at which time new Section 314 would go into effect with the same standard for Inter Partes Review.) The new standard was designed to ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7d3bb63f-2742-4f4f-86c7-da6479c49a8d&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform: the complexities of small, micro, and nano-entities</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=2c948e60-3d58-4923-8dd6-5ec6b11ac61c" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-22:/commentary/11209600</id>
    <updated>2011-08-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 For example, Section Ten of HR 1249, the core legislative document at the center of the current patent reform, establishes a new feature of the PTO fee structure for so-called micro-entities. Micro-entities receive a 75% fee discount. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=2c948e60-3d58-4923-8dd6-5ec6b11ac61c&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IP Update - Patent Law Reform 2011 - August 5, 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3b689b54-8b43-405e-b94d-01c7b22b8611" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-22:/commentary/11209599</id>
    <updated>2011-08-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>JD Supra (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The US House of Representatives voted by a margin of 304 to 117 on June 23, 2011, to reform US patent laws by approving the America Invents Act (HR 1249). This vote follows approval in the US Senate of very similar legislation (S. 23) on March 8, 2011. ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3b689b54-8b43-405e-b94d-01c7b22b8611&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A pie in the face for the jobless</title>
    <link href="http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/local/courier_times_news/opinion/oped/a-pie-in-the-face-for-the-jobless/article_5ec1074c-0eff-5227-9d2b-9ef7dff2e8e9.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-21:/commentary/11206891</id>
    <updated>2011-08-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>phillyBurbs.com (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The object of the legislation, HR 1249, is not &#8220;protecting American jobs,&#8221; as the advertising of the US Chamber of Commerce claims. It is, as always, about protecting established corporate profit. The legislation will make it harder for small ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/local/courier_times_news/opinion/oped/a-pie-in-the-face-for-the-jobless/article_5ec1074c-0eff-5227-9d2b-9ef7dff2e8e9.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Judiciary Committee plans aggressive fall jobs agenda</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/177373-judiciary-committee-plans-aggressive-fall-jobs-agenda" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-18:/commentary/11196198</id>
    <updated>2011-08-18T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Elsewhere, Smith&amp;#39;s committee has already approved a patent-reform bill, HR 1249, that he said would modernize the US patent system and thus help protect job creation. &#8220;This may well be the most significant jobs bill passed this year,&#8221; he said, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/177373-judiciary-committee-plans-aggressive-fall-jobs-agenda&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent law changes appear imminent</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a7b3c81c-dd07-4503-ad97-fccc3c7d9e60" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-17:/commentary/11192254</id>
    <updated>2011-08-17T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House of Representatives bill (HR 1249), which was primarily based on the Senate version, was approved by a 304-117 vote on June 23, 2011. It is most probable that the Senate will simply approve the House bill and send it to President Obama for ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a7b3c81c-dd07-4503-ad97-fccc3c7d9e60&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Proper business method patent challenges under the America Invents Act?</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=13320f29-2df2-4ede-ad78-5ebdc910171b" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-15:/commentary/11184361</id>
    <updated>2011-08-15T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The current version of the legislation (HR 1249) includes a provision entitled &#8220;Transitional Program for Covered Business Method Patents.&#8221; The provision essentially provides post grant review (as defined in the legislation) for patents that were issue&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=13320f29-2df2-4ede-ad78-5ebdc910171b&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Locke Lord Bissell &amp;amp; Liddell LLP | The D.C. Update (Vol. III, No. 17)</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2413517" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-12:/commentary/11172362</id>
    <updated>2011-08-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 filed cloture Tuesday, August 2, on a motion to proceed to the House-passed bill, HR 1249, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. The legislation would make changes to the way patents are awarded, reviewed and challenged, modifying the basis for awarding ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2413517&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>USPTO&amp;#39;s Future Budget</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/08/usptos-future-budget.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-11:/commentary/11169419</id>
    <updated>2011-08-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patently-O</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House Bill (HR 1249) does not include that guarantee. At this point, it appears most likely that the House Bill will be accepted in the Senate and that the PTO will be left without any budgetary protections from the congressional appropriations ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/08/usptos-future-budget.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Barletta&amp;#39;s performance protested</title>
    <link href="http://www.timesleader.com/news/Barletta_rsquo_s_performance_protested_08-10-2011.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-10:/commentary/11162363</id>
    <updated>2011-08-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Wilkes Barre Times-Leader</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Barletta provided a list of 15 pieces of legislation he has voted for that creates jobs, including HR 4, the Small Business Paperwork Mandate Elimination Act that has been signed into law that helps fix the tax code to help job creators and HR 1249, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesleader.com/news/Barletta_rsquo_s_performance_protested_08-10-2011.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>My Suggestion on Patent Law</title>
    <link href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-cuban/my-suggestion-on-patent-l_b_921198.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-08:/commentary/11178802</id>
    <updated>2011-08-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Huffington Post (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 (The full text of the bill, HR 1249, can be read here. This bill passed the House 304-117 and it&amp;#39;s companion bill (here) passed the senate 95-5, vitally assuring that the two bills will be reconciled and signed into law in early September, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-cuban/my-suggestion-on-patent-l_b_921198.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Top Agenda Item In the &quot;Pivot to Jobs&quot; Will Be a Boon For Big Business</title>
    <link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCongressCongressGossipBlog/~3/qysAy4nroBE/2355-Top-Agenda-Item-In-the-Pivot-to-Jobs-Will-Be-a-Boon-For-Big-Business-" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-08:/commentary/11144801</id>
    <updated>2011-08-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>OpenCongress</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...up in the big pivot to jobs that&#8217;s going to sweep Washington when Congress comes back from August recess is H.R.1249, the &#8220;America Invents Act.&#8221; The bill isn&#8217;t exactly a response to the current unemployment crisis; it&#8217;s designed to streamline &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCongressCongressGossipBlog/~3/qysAy4nroBE/2355-Top-Agenda-Item-In-the-Pivot-to-Jobs-Will-Be-a-Boon-For-Big-Business-&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IP Update - Patent Law Reform 2011 - August 8, 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=d97dfcea-2d43-41cd-be51-d55dc86c5277" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-08:/commentary/11144800</id>
    <updated>2011-08-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>JD Supra (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The US House of Representatives voted by a margin of 304 to 117 on June 23, 2011, to reform US patent laws by approving the America Invents Act (HR 1249). This vote follows approval in the US Senate of very similar legislation (S.23) on March 8, 2011. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=d97dfcea-2d43-41cd-be51-d55dc86c5277&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Can a forum selection clause prevent patent reexamination?</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=dc415c12-0562-4bac-b5ad-f089df6b546a" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-08:/commentary/11144696</id>
    <updated>2011-08-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 317 of HR 1249), which would effectively discontinue the USPTO&amp;#39;s efforts by operation of private agreement. Those fashioning forum selection clauses for litigation settlement purposes would be wise to consider the changing landscape of post grant ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=dc415c12-0562-4bac-b5ad-f089df6b546a&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Submit this story</title>
    <link href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-cuban/my-suggestion-on-patent-l_b_921198.html?ir=Yahoo" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-08:/commentary/11144693</id>
    <updated>2011-08-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Huffington Post</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 (The full text of the bill, HR 1249, can be read here. This bill passed the House 304-117 and it&amp;#39;s companion bill (here) passed the senate 95-5, vitally assuring that the two bills will be reconciled and signed into law in early September, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-cuban/my-suggestion-on-patent-l_b_921198.html?ir=Yahoo&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Venable | Patent reform will likely have to wait until after Labor Day</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2388461" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-08:/commentary/11144692</id>
    <updated>2011-08-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In February 2011, the United States Senate overwhelmingly passed S.23, its version of the patent reform bill, also known as known as the America Invents Act. In June 2011, the US House of Representatives passed its own version, HR 1249. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2388461&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Singled out</title>
    <link href="http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/08/06/1393893/singled-out.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-06:/commentary/11141724</id>
    <updated>2011-08-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>News &amp;amp; Observer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Renee Ellmers&amp;#39; vote for HR 1249. The ad, paid for by the US Chamber of Commerce, made no mention of all the NC Democratic representatives who also voted &amp;quot;aye&amp;quot; for this bill: David Price, Mike McIntyre, Larry Kissell, etc. Not to mention all &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/08/06/1393893/singled-out.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Workers, public works</title>
    <link href="http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/08/06/1393892/workers-public-works.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-05:/commentary/11164661</id>
    <updated>2011-08-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>News &amp;amp; Observer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Renee Ellmers&amp;#39; vote for HR 1249. We have high unemployment, low taxes, a large military about to stand down. We have roads, bridges, airports, public buildings etc. that need fixing. Do we not see an opportunity here? Can we not position this country &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/08/06/1393892/workers-public-works.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House passes the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act; U.S. poised to move to a ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=2d855e43-e6dc-4e78-ad6b-55ab2369f93d" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-05:/commentary/11144694</id>
    <updated>2011-08-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On June 23, the United States House of Representatives passed an amended version of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (the &#8220;Act&#8221;), HR 1249, 112th Cong. (2011) (as passed by House, June 23, 2011), ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=2d855e43-e6dc-4e78-ad6b-55ab2369f93d&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress proposes to change law regarding failure to obtain advice of counsel</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e906c8bb-165b-4b9f-8b19-4def554afacb" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-05:/commentary/11139550</id>
    <updated>2011-08-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Both houses of Congress have passed their own versions of patent reform legislation (S.23 and HR 1249) in an effort to overhaul the United States patent system and bring it into closer conformity with international practices. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e906c8bb-165b-4b9f-8b19-4def554afacb&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Impact of Patent Reform on Filing Strategy (I)</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/08/the-impact-of-patent-reform-on-filing-strategy-i.html?cid=6a00d8341c588553ef014e8a6789aa970d" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-05:/commentary/11139549</id>
    <updated>2011-08-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patently-O</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The new law defining prior art would become effective 18&#8211;months from the date of enactment of HR 1249. Patent applications filed after that date would be bound by the new first-to-file rules. The major exception is that old invention-date rules will ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/08/the-impact-of-patent-reform-on-filing-strategy-i.html?cid=6a00d8341c588553ef014e8a6789aa970d&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Troutman Sanders LLP | Patent Reform on the Fast Track in Congress?</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2359889" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-04:/commentary/11139551</id>
    <updated>2011-08-04T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 PatentlyO reports here that the House version of patent reform legislation, HR 1249, will be the first item that the Senate will take up after its August recess. Rather than attempt to reconcile the differences between the House and Senate passed bills ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2359889&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Read More &amp;gt;</title>
    <link href="http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2011/08/03/us-senate-vote-on-patent-reform-expected-in-september/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-03:/commentary/11131907</id>
    <updated>2011-08-03T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Watch (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 According to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid yesterday filed cloture on the motion to proceed to HR 1249, the House-passed Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. The Senate will vote on ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2011/08/03/us-senate-vote-on-patent-reform-expected-in-september/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Back to Senate After Labor Day</title>
    <link href="http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/08/03/patent-reform-back-to-senate-after-labor-day/id=18543/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-03:/commentary/11131905</id>
    <updated>2011-08-03T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPWatchdog.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Unfortunately for those who would like to see patent reform derailed, the fact that there was unanimous consent in the Senate for a cloture vote almost certainly suggests that there will be at least 60 votes to end debate on HR 1249, which will bring ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/08/03/patent-reform-back-to-senate-after-labor-day/id=18543/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Leaving FAA in limbo, Senate adjourns for August recess</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/175113-leaving-faa-in-limbo-senate-adjourns-for-august-recess" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-02:/commentary/11131906</id>
    <updated>2011-08-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Reid also filed for cloture on the Patent Reform legislation, HR 1249, titled The America Invents Act, and confirmed a number of minor executive nominees via unanimous consent including new ambassadors to Mexico, Vietnam and Guatemala. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/175113-leaving-faa-in-limbo-senate-adjourns-for-august-recess&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Baker Botts LLP | IP Report July 2011</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2337368" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-08-01:/commentary/11125978</id>
    <updated>2011-08-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On June 23, the United States House of Representatives passed an amended version of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (the &#8220;Act&#8221;), HR 1249, 112th Cong. (2011) (as passed by House, June 23, 2011), by a vote of 304-117. 157 Cong. Rec. H4505 (daily ed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2337368&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dr. Shine S. (Sean) Tu, Associate Professor of Law, West Virginia University ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.pr.com/press-release/342571" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-31:/commentary/11109011</id>
    <updated>2011-07-31T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PR.com (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Recently, the US Senate and House of Representatives passed similar versions of the Patent Reform Act of 2011 (S. 23 and HR 1249, respectively). These bills, also known as The America Invents Act, include many significant changes such as the move from ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pr.com/press-release/342571&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Letter: Chamber of Commerce ad praising Rooney made me laugh</title>
    <link href="http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2011/jul/27/letter-chamber-of-commerce-ad-praising-rooney-me/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-27:/commentary/11104900</id>
    <updated>2011-07-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>TCPalm</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 I had to laugh when I saw an ad in the &amp;quot;Good For You&amp;quot; section of the July 24 paper paid for by the US Chamber of Commerce (not a consumer-friendly group), thanking our puppet congressman, Tom Rooney, R-Tequesta, for voting for HR 1249, The Ameri&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2011/jul/27/letter-chamber-of-commerce-ad-praising-rooney-me/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bio/Pharm Legislation Watch</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/07/biopharm-legislation-watch.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-21:/commentary/11104901</id>
    <updated>2011-07-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Prior to House passage of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249), Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) was able to squeeze a provision into House Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith&amp;#39;s (R-TX) Manager&amp;#39;s Amendment that would allow a &amp;quot;genetic d&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/07/biopharm-legislation-watch.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Education</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=21a0ca72-b28d-4151-bdb6-6cfa733a6d05" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-19:/commentary/11104906</id>
    <updated>2011-07-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 While the Senate has not yet considered the House-passed patent overhaul bill (HR 1249), on July 13, House Appropriators approved the FY2012 Commerce-Science-Justice spending bill, which provides $2.7 billion to the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=21a0ca72-b28d-4151-bdb6-6cfa733a6d05&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>This week in Washington - July 16, 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a34d8531-d590-4769-b5ae-357b415c250b" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-19:/commentary/11104905</id>
    <updated>2011-07-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 While the Senate has not yet considered the House-passed patent overhaul bill (HR 1249), the House FY 2012 CJS committee-approved bill provides $2.7 billion to the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) &#8212; the full amount the office has estimated it will .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a34d8531-d590-4769-b5ae-357b415c250b&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PTO alternatives to full litigation under the patent reform bills</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=b4fcd17f-2cc1-4d02-a6e6-de38b10bcb85" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-18:/commentary/11104904</id>
    <updated>2011-07-18T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 If this sounds too good to be true, then you should read the pending S. 23 and HR 1249 patent reform bills which passed the Senate and House by wide margins and is very likely to be enacted in similar form. These bills provide (in what will be 35 USC ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=b4fcd17f-2cc1-4d02-a6e6-de38b10bcb85&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Proposed patent reforms continue to generate commentary; business method ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=19ebacc7-98dd-4bd1-a728-577bb803d50d" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-14:/commentary/11104903</id>
    <updated>2011-07-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Retired Judge Paul Michel, who formerly served as chief judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals and retired in 2010 to participate in the debate over patent reform, recently published a comment on a House bill (HR 1249) provision that would ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=19ebacc7-98dd-4bd1-a728-577bb803d50d&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>U.S. House of Representatives approves America Invents Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6c2a6d12-e828-42b5-bd86-7d31416d542f" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-14:/commentary/11104902</id>
    <updated>2011-07-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 With the recent passage of HR 1249 by the US House of Representatives, Congress is poised to enact the most sweeping reform of the patent laws since the Patent Act of 1952. A similar version of the &#8220;America Invents Act&#8221; was passed ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6c2a6d12-e828-42b5-bd86-7d31416d542f&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Law Reform Is Almost Here</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/138708/Patent/Patent+Law+Reform+Is+Almost+Here" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-13:/commentary/11144695</id>
    <updated>2011-07-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq News Alerts (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House of Representatives passed Bill HR 1249 by a vote of 304 - 117 on June 23, 2011. The two bills as passed are very similar and so reconciliation of their texts is not expected to be a problem. President Obama has indicated that he will sign the ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/138708/Patent/Patent+Law+Reform+Is+Almost+Here&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform News Briefs</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/07/patent-reform-news-briefs.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-12:/commentary/11094784</id>
    <updated>2011-07-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In Monday&amp;#39;s IPO Daily News, the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) suggested that HR 1249, which the House passed on June 23 (see &amp;quot;House Passes HR 1249&amp;quot;), might not be brought up by the Senate until after Congress&amp;#39; August ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/07/patent-reform-news-briefs.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform bill nearing passage; financial services sector to be impacted</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=96a88ce2-6314-4b68-b992-0f9ed11be5f5" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-12:/commentary/11094778</id>
    <updated>2011-07-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House version of this definition is nearly identical in substance, but rather than being confined to &#8220;data processing operations,&#8221; the House version encompasses &#8220;data processing or other operations&#8221; (see HR 1249, Section 18(d)(1)). ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=96a88ce2-6314-4b68-b992-0f9ed11be5f5&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Techcomm</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0d3db611-588e-4607-a481-7b6c5edb1c66" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-12:/commentary/11088751</id>
    <updated>2011-07-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On June 23, the House of Representatives passed HR 1249, the America Invents Act, by a vote of 304-117. Having also passed the Senate, differences in the two bills will now have to be reconciled before it is sent to the White House for the President&amp;#39;s&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0d3db611-588e-4607-a481-7b6c5edb1c66&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Stalled in the Senate Thanks to Debt Ceiling</title>
    <link href="http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/07/12/patent-reform-stalled-in-the-senate-thanks-to-debt-ceiling/id=18075/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-12:/commentary/11088750</id>
    <updated>2011-07-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPWatchdog.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 It has now been several weeks since the US House of Representatives passed HR 1249, dubbed the America Invents Act, which is commonly referred to as patent reform. In February 2011, the US Senate passed S. 23, their version of patent reform. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/07/12/patent-reform-stalled-in-the-senate-thanks-to-debt-ceiling/id=18075/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform - America Invents Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=dfa1c334-612d-44c4-b06c-ff1b86294ab2" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-11:/commentary/11082677</id>
    <updated>2011-07-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 HR 1249 was subsequently approved by the House Judiciary Committee on April 14, 2011, with slight amendments. Notable substantive differences between S.23 and HR 1249 include: HR 1249 expands limitations on false marking litigation with a three-year ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=dfa1c334-612d-44c4-b06c-ff1b86294ab2&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Torpedoing Patent Rights</title>
    <link href="http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/07/10/torpedoing-patent-rights/id=18022/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-10:/commentary/11076561</id>
    <updated>2011-07-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPWatchdog.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The vast number of America&amp;#39;s companies that need patents to prosper and grow should fear the post-grant provisions for challenging patents in HR 1249, the patent reform bill passed last month by the House of Representatives. In a system already plague&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/07/10/torpedoing-patent-rights/id=18022/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Bakersfield Californian Strictly Business column</title>
    <link href="http://www.istockanalyst.com/business/news/5279733/the-bakersfield-californian-strictly-business-column" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-08:/commentary/11072692</id>
    <updated>2011-07-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>istockAnalyst.com (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Answer: HR 1249 (&amp;quot;America Invents Act&amp;quot;), like so many other bills passed in the last couple of years, increases the size and complexity of the federal bureaucracy. For example, this bill adds three new administrative proceedings to correct older&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.istockanalyst.com/business/news/5279733/the-bakersfield-californian-strictly-business-column&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Bakersfield Californian Strictly Business column</title>
    <link href="http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/yb/161080421" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-08:/commentary/11069370</id>
    <updated>2011-07-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>American Chronicle</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Answer: HR 1249 (&amp;quot;America Invents Act&amp;quot;), like so many other bills passed in the last couple of years, increases the size and complexity of the federal bureaucracy. For example, this bill adds three new administrative proceedings to correct older&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/yb/161080421&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Guest Post: Rein in the Big Bank Bail-Out</title>
    <link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PatentlyO/~3/R79weDYDHXU/guest-post-rein-in-the-big-bank-bail-out.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-08:/commentary/11069358</id>
    <updated>2011-07-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patently-O</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...Judge of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Last month the House of Representatives passed the America Invents Act (H.R.1249), as the Senate had earlier, with the goal of streamlining patent law. Massive lobbying by Wall Street banks, however,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PatentlyO/~3/R79weDYDHXU/guest-post-rein-in-the-big-bank-bail-out.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>American Davids of Innovation, Start Your Engines: Strategies for Coping with ...</title>
    <link href="http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/07/07/american-davids-of-innovation-start-your-engines-strategies-for-coping-with-first-to-file-under-the-america-invents-act/id=18008/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-07:/commentary/11069369</id>
    <updated>2011-07-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPWatchdog.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Now that the dust is settling from the passage of HR 1249/S.23 (aka the oxymoronic America Invents Act) and those (like me) have stopped &#8220;moaning and groaning&#8221; about how the America Invents Act or AIA (I feel like washing my mouth out with Ivory soap &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/07/07/american-davids-of-innovation-start-your-engines-strategies-for-coping-with-first-to-file-under-the-america-invents-act/id=18008/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform bill clears House; reconciliation with Senate bill expected</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=421b32fe-6473-4be9-b3b2-289d6d0dc194" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-06:/commentary/11125979</id>
    <updated>2011-07-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 HR 1249 passed the House comfortably, 304-117. The Senate approved S. 23 by a solid 95-5 vote on March 8, 2011. Both bills would do the following: The most significant reform in both versions of the bill would change US patent laws from a ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=421b32fe-6473-4be9-b3b2-289d6d0dc194&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Strictly Business: Q&amp;amp;A with Jeffrey A. Travis, partner with Borton Petrini, LLP</title>
    <link href="http://www.bakersfield.com/news/business/economy/x1928174270/Strictly-Business-Q-A-with-Jeffrey-A-Travis-partner-with-Borton-Petrini-LLP" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-06:/commentary/11066565</id>
    <updated>2011-07-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bakersfield Californian</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Answer: HR 1249 (&amp;quot;America Invents Act&amp;quot;), like so many other bills passed in the last couple of years, increases the size and complexity of the federal bureaucracy. For example, this bill adds three new administrative proceedings to correct older&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bakersfield.com/news/business/economy/x1928174270/Strictly-Business-Q-A-with-Jeffrey-A-Travis-partner-with-Borton-Petrini-LLP&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sen. Chris Coons urges House to approve compromise on patent reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.thestatecolumn.com/delaware/sen-chris-coons-urges-house-to-approve-compromise-on-patent-reform/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-06:/commentary/11063767</id>
    <updated>2011-07-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The State Column</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is calling on members of the House of Representatives to support the compromise contained in the manager&amp;#39;s amendment to HR 1249, the America Invents Act, to ensure that critical changes to our nation&amp;#39;s p&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestatecolumn.com/delaware/sen-chris-coons-urges-house-to-approve-compromise-on-patent-reform/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ballard Spahr | Patent Reform Bill Clears House; Reconciliation with Senate ...</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2179291" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-06:/commentary/11063730</id>
    <updated>2011-07-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 HR 1249 passed the House comfortably, 304-117. The Senate approved S. 23 by a solid 95-5 vote on March 8, 2011. Both bills would do the following: The most significant reform in both versions of the bill would change US patent laws from a ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2179291&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lobbying for a Patent Term Extension</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/07/lobbying-for-a-patent-term-extension.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-06:/commentary/11062247</id>
    <updated>2011-07-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patently-O</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Finally, the recent patent reform bill passed in the House of Representatives (HR 1249) includes a provision particularly crafted to aide MDCO. The provision says simply that, for the purposes of calculating the PTE application due date, any regulatory ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/07/lobbying-for-a-patent-term-extension.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform passes the House of Representatives</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=1133c2b9-1227-4ef5-ab43-a77caf89d0f2" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-05:/commentary/11059865</id>
    <updated>2011-07-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 This bill HR 1249, and its counterpart, S. 23, are the biggest change in US patent law in over a century. The bill affects most areas of the patent system, including the definitions of patentable subject matter and novelty; administrative procedures ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=1133c2b9-1227-4ef5-ab43-a77caf89d0f2&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>One step closer: dramatic changes to patent law around the corner</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a5936bb9-d9c2-4bcc-8ecc-70be15180252" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-05:/commentary/11059844</id>
    <updated>2011-07-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Act, HR 1249, is similar to a bill passed by the Senate last spring, and will alter the way the United States treats its inventors. The America Invests Act moves the US from a &#8220;first-to-invent&#8221; system to a &#8220;first-to-file&#8221; system. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a5936bb9-d9c2-4bcc-8ecc-70be15180252&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform is on the immediate horizon &#8211; new options for challenging ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=58b24c9c-ca0b-408a-b479-af7d13d9d6ad" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-04:/commentary/11056713</id>
    <updated>2011-07-04T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On June 23, 2011, the US House of Representatives passed the America Invents Act (HR 1249), which follows in the wake of the Senate version, S. 23, approved on March 8, 2011. Although differences between the two bills will have to ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=58b24c9c-ca0b-408a-b479-af7d13d9d6ad&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Proposed &amp;#39;patent reform&amp;#39; threatens US jobs</title>
    <link href="http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2011/07/proposed-patent-reform-threatens-us-jobs" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-03:/commentary/11056711</id>
    <updated>2011-07-03T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>San Francisco Examiner</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 I am deeply concerned that the America Invents Act (HR 1249) will stall American innovation and send more of our jobs overseas. The fatal problem is that the bill rejects the main premise that has guided American patent law for more than two centuries ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2011/07/proposed-patent-reform-threatens-us-jobs&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Applause for Westmoreland</title>
    <link href="http://www.times-herald.com/opinion/Applause-for-Westmoreland--1736593" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-02:/commentary/11049066</id>
    <updated>2011-07-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Newnan Times-Herald</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Once passed into law, the bipartisan America Invents Act (HR 1249) will provide much-needed reform and common sense updates to current US patent law. These changes will ensure adequate funding of the US Patent and Trademark Office, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.times-herald.com/opinion/Applause-for-Westmoreland--1736593&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NAM supports legislation to protect intellectual property and jobs.</title>
    <link href="http://news.thomasnet.com/companystory/NAM-supports-legislation-to-protect-intellectual-property-and-jobs-598256" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-07-01:/commentary/11040846</id>
    <updated>2011-07-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ThomasNet Industrial News Room</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 July 1, 2011 - Dorothy Coleman, NAM Vice President for Tax and Domestic Economic Policy, issued statement in support of HR 1249, the America Invents Act. This legislation ensures a well-funded and properly staffed US Patent and Trademark Office that ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.thomasnet.com/companystory/NAM-supports-legislation-to-protect-intellectual-property-and-jobs-598256&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&amp;#39;Patent Reform&amp;#39; proposal threatens American jobs</title>
    <link href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2011/06/patent-reform-proposal-threatens-american-jobs" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-30:/commentary/11038464</id>
    <updated>2011-06-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Washington Examiner</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 I am deeply concerned that the America Invents Act (HR 1249) will stall American innovation and send more of our jobs overseas. The fatal problem is that the bill rejects the main premise that has guided American patent law for more than two centuries ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2011/06/patent-reform-proposal-threatens-american-jobs&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House Approves Patent Overhaul</title>
    <link href="http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/89/i27/8927notw2.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-30:/commentary/11038463</id>
    <updated>2011-06-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical &amp;amp; Engineering News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The America Invents Act (HR 1249), which would be the biggest overhaul of US patent law since 1952, was approved by the House, 304-117, on June 23. &#8220;No longer will American inventors be forced to protect the technologies of today with the tools of the .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/89/i27/8927notw2.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Leahy looking to move House-passed patent bill in Senate</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/168945-leahy-looking-to-move-house-passed-patent-bill-in-senate" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-29:/commentary/11056714</id>
    <updated>2011-06-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In an email to members of the committee, Leahy stressed that several groups support quick passage of the House bill, HR 1249, and said there is &amp;quot;growing support for the Leahy-Smith American Invents Act,&amp;quot; referring to Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/168945-leahy-looking-to-move-house-passed-patent-bill-in-senate&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform escapes the House, back to the Senate</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=3a5a5bef-565f-44fe-ba35-6681303ed0b5" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-29:/commentary/11038465</id>
    <updated>2011-06-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On June 23, 2011, the House voted 304 to 117 to approve HR 1249. The approved bill differed from the bill passed by the House Judiciary Committee, and bears a new title, &#8220;The Leahy-Smith America Invents ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=3a5a5bef-565f-44fe-ba35-6681303ed0b5&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House of Representatives passes Patent Reform Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=30517e23-ec33-4a2b-ac57-28dbe4af455b" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-29:/commentary/11034643</id>
    <updated>2011-06-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On June 23, the US House of Representatives passed the America Invents Act (304-117) (HR 1249), which will alter some central aspects of the current patent system. Over the last five years, various members of Congress have been seeking to reform the ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=30517e23-ec33-4a2b-ac57-28dbe4af455b&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>President Obama Press Conference</title>
    <link href="http://www.wnyc.org/articles/its-free-country/2011/jun/29/watch-live-president-obama-press-conference/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-29:/commentary/11034642</id>
    <updated>2011-06-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WNYC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The America Invents Act HR 1249, in conference now, will make it harder for American Inventors to get patents. Obama has promised to sign this bad bill. I&amp;#39;m a patent attorney who represents individual inventors. Obama scares me because he leans so far&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wnyc.org/articles/its-free-country/2011/jun/29/watch-live-president-obama-press-conference/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Universities &amp;amp; Micro Entities to Receive 75% reduction in Patent Office Fees</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/06/universities-micro-entities-to-receive-75-reduction-in-patent-office-fees.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-28:/commentary/11038466</id>
    <updated>2011-06-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patently-O</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In a major subsidy to universities, the House Bill (HR 1249) grants the 75% fee reduction to public and non-profit universities and other &#8220;institutes of higher education.&#8221; The Senate Bill (S. 23) only grants the 75% reduction to State public ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/06/universities-micro-entities-to-receive-75-reduction-in-patent-office-fees.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House passes patent reform bill (H.R. 1249) by 304 to 117 &#8211; differences with ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=91a30dbf-c787-472f-b573-0f4f5c6de374" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-28:/commentary/11034913</id>
    <updated>2011-06-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Following earlier approval by the Senate on March 8, 2011 of a patent reform bill (S. 23) (see http://tinyurl.com/4sq5thf), the House today approved the America Invents Act by a vote of 304 to 117 (HR 1249) (see ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=91a30dbf-c787-472f-b573-0f4f5c6de374&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House Version of Patent Reform Poses Challenges for Biotech Inventors</title>
    <link href="http://www.genengnews.com/analysis-and-insight/house-version-of-patent-reform-poses-challenges-for-biotech-inventors/77899427/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-28:/commentary/11034645</id>
    <updated>2011-06-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Genetic Engineering News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Like the Senate bill (S.23), the House&amp;#39;s version of America Invents (HR 1249) changes the criteria for awarding patents from &#8220;first to invent&#8221; to &#8220;first inventor to file.&#8221; Supporters contend that it will benefit smaller inventors by aligning t&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.genengnews.com/analysis-and-insight/house-version-of-patent-reform-poses-challenges-for-biotech-inventors/77899427/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House passes first-to-file patent reform bill: America Invents Act closer to ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=c4ad35c2-64ff-42c9-adae-7c01c092fc10" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-28:/commentary/11034341</id>
    <updated>2011-06-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On June 23, 2011, The US House passed the America Invents Act, HR 1249, by a bipartisan majority of 304 to 117, supported by 168 Republicans and 136 Democrats. In March, the Senate passed a similar bill by a wide margin of ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=c4ad35c2-64ff-42c9-adae-7c01c092fc10&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House Passes Patent Reform Bill, Differences to Be Resolved With Senate Version</title>
    <link href="http://fdanews.com/newsletter/article?issueId=14851&amp;amp;articleId=137882" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-28:/commentary/11031647</id>
    <updated>2011-06-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>FDA news (subscription)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The bill, HR 1249, most notably transforms the US patent system from a first-to-invent system to a first-to-file system, but it includes additional changes that could greatly impact the ability of pharmaceutical companies to seek and protect patents. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://fdanews.com/newsletter/article?issueId=14851&amp;amp;articleId=137882&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Education</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=2be33037-e1a8-4828-9768-886280bcf5f8" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-28:/commentary/11031610</id>
    <updated>2011-06-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House passed (304-117) patent overhaul legislation (HR 1249) on Thursday, June 23, after tweaking language related to funding for the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). The new language would allow Congressional appropriators to maintain control ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=2be33037-e1a8-4828-9768-886280bcf5f8&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Techcomm</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e3ddfe47-90e9-412b-96ef-05f9e934a4bc" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-28:/commentary/11031609</id>
    <updated>2011-06-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 After a week of behind the scenes debate, the House passed HR. 1249, the America Invents Act, by a vote of 304-117 on June 23. From the time the bill was reported by the House Judiciary Committee, the measure has been under bipartisan attack on a ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e3ddfe47-90e9-412b-96ef-05f9e934a4bc&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>This week in Washington - june 24, 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=3db1d4f7-a9dd-42a6-bc73-815ed4c90cb6" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-28:/commentary/11031608</id>
    <updated>2011-06-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House passed (304-117) patent reform legislation (HR 1249) on Thursday after tweaking language related to funding for the US Patent and Trademark Office. The new language would allow congressional appropriators to maintain control of the Patent ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=3db1d4f7-a9dd-42a6-bc73-815ed4c90cb6&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IP Update - Patent Law Reform 2011 - June 27, 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=a5621944-58ed-4fda-8df8-e223525f89da" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-28:/commentary/11031607</id>
    <updated>2011-06-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>JD Supra (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The US House of Representatives voted by a margin of 304 to 117 on June 23, 2011, to reform US patent laws by approving the America Invents Act (HR 1249). This vote follows approval in the US Senate of very similar legislation (S. 23) on March 8, 2011. ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=a5621944-58ed-4fda-8df8-e223525f89da&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>2011 patent law reform update- the &amp;quot;America Invents Act&amp;quot;</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=01a0f2df-377b-45d2-9884-4ad2032b15be" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-28:/commentary/11031606</id>
    <updated>2011-06-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 June 23, 2011 &#8211; The House of Representatives approved the renamed Leahy&#8211;Smith America Invents Act (HR 1249) this afternoon by a bipartisan vote of 304-117, following adoption of the Manager&amp;#39;s Amendment and minor amendments on the following subject&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=01a0f2df-377b-45d2-9884-4ad2032b15be&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rep. Michele Bachmann Votes to Preserve Constitutionality of Patent Process</title>
    <link href="http://www.thestatecolumn.com/minnesota/rep-michele-bachmann-votes-to-preserve-constitutionality-of-patent-process/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-28:/commentary/11031604</id>
    <updated>2011-06-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The State Column</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Yesterday, Congresswoman Michele Bachmann (MN-06) cast a vote against HR 1249, the America Invents Act, because the bill will drastically alter the Constitutional and traditional American patent process. Bachmann said: &#8220;I could not in good conscience ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestatecolumn.com/minnesota/rep-michele-bachmann-votes-to-preserve-constitutionality-of-patent-process/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>This Week in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/06/27/988938/-This-Week-in-Congress" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-27:/commentary/11076562</id>
    <updated>2011-06-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Kos</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House worked through and passed its patent bill, HR 1249, the &amp;quot;America Invents Act.&amp;quot; And since no week would be complete without also passing a drilling free-for-all bill, they threw one of those in there, too, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/06/27/988938/-This-Week-in-Congress&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dr Coburn Urges House to Reject Modified Patent Bill</title>
    <link href="http://politicalnews.me/?id=8023" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-27:/commentary/11056712</id>
    <updated>2011-06-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PoliticalNews.me (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 (WASHINGTON, DC) &#8211; US Senator Tom Coburn, MD (R-OK) released the following statement regarding the flawed patent reform bill, HR 1249, moving through the House of Representatives. &#8220;For too long tomorrow&amp;#39;s inventions have been stymied by today&amp;#39;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://politicalnews.me/?id=8023&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Balancing Disclosure, Protection of Trade Secrets, and Patentability in Light ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2011/0627_patents_villasenor.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-27:/commentary/11034644</id>
    <updated>2011-06-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Brookings Institution</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The cited language is from Section 102(a)(2) and is identical in HR 1249 and in the corresponding Senate version of the America Invents Act, S. 23. Sections 151 and 122(b) of the United States Code referenced in the new Section 102 text pertain to the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2011/0627_patents_villasenor.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The house votes to reform U.S. patent laws by approving the America Invents ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=55ca3de1-1436-4fd5-9be4-de4b7b073edd" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-27:/commentary/11034342</id>
    <updated>2011-06-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The US House of Representatives voted by a margin of 304 to 117 on June 23, 2011, to reform US patent laws by approving the America Invents Act (HR 1249). This vote follows approval in the US Senate of very similar legislation (S. 23) on March 8, 2011. ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=55ca3de1-1436-4fd5-9be4-de4b7b073edd&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>US House passage of patent reform legislation gets mixed reception</title>
    <link href="http://www.thepharmaletter.com/file/105346/us-house-passage-of-patent-reform-legislation-gets-mixed-reception.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-27:/commentary/11031605</id>
    <updated>2011-06-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Pharma Letter</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The US House of Representatives last week passed HR 1249, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, with broad bipartisan support. The Senate passed its version of the bill (S 23) on March 8 by a vote of 95 to 5. The two chambers will now work out ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepharmaletter.com/file/105346/us-house-passage-of-patent-reform-legislation-gets-mixed-reception.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The House Votes to Reform US Patent Laws by Approving the America Invents Act ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=4e60ca71-9507-4a41-8d3b-fd9b2f10b982" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-27:/commentary/11030420</id>
    <updated>2011-06-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>JD Supra (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The US House of Representatives voted by a margin of 304 to 117 on June 23, 2011, to reform US patent laws by approving the America Invents Act (HR 1249). This vote follows approval in the US Senate of very similar legislation (S. 23) on March 8, 2011. ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=4e60ca71-9507-4a41-8d3b-fd9b2f10b982&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Inventing a bad way to reform patent law</title>
    <link href="http://www.desertdispatch.com/opinion/patent-11129-first-system.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-27:/commentary/11027888</id>
    <updated>2011-06-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Desert Dispatch</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On June 23, the House of Representatives passed HR 1249, the America Invents Act, to reform patents. House Speaker John Boehner said that day in a statement, &amp;quot;The fact that it takes, on average, three years for Washington to approve a patent helps ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.desertdispatch.com/opinion/patent-11129-first-system.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Not the patent term extension fix we need</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=3ed1ce2d-516f-4ffd-8f41-d545e28fa8a6" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-27:/commentary/11027866</id>
    <updated>2011-06-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House patent reform bill (HR 1249) that was passed last week includes a provision that impacts the deadline for filing an application for patent term extension under 35 USC &#167; 156 after receiving FDA approval for a ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=3ed1ce2d-516f-4ffd-8f41-d545e28fa8a6&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Recapping Last Week in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.congressmatters.com/story/2011/6/27/2773/-This-Week-in-Congress" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-27:/commentary/11027865</id>
    <updated>2011-06-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Congress Matters</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House worked through and passed its patent bill, HR 1249, the &amp;quot;America Invents Act.&amp;quot; And since no week would be complete without also passing a drilling free-for-all bill, they threw one of those in there, too, as HR 2021, the &amp;quot;Jobs and&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.congressmatters.com/story/2011/6/27/2773/-This-Week-in-Congress&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House Version of Patent Reform Differs from Senate&amp;#39;s Over Fee Diversion</title>
    <link href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202498590312&amp;amp;US_House_and_Senate_to_Iron_Out_Differences_on_Fees_in_Patent_Reform_Bills" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-27:/commentary/11027864</id>
    <updated>2011-06-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Corporate Counsel</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On June 23, the US House of Representatives passed The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, HR 1249, by a 304-117 vote. The vote follows the US Senate&amp;#39;s March 95-5 vote for S.23, but differences between them mean the bills must be reconciled before ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202498590312&amp;amp;US_House_and_Senate_to_Iron_Out_Differences_on_Fees_in_Patent_Reform_Bills&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform - If Your Head Hurt Before . . .</title>
    <link href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20110624140625385" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-27:/commentary/11027862</id>
    <updated>2011-06-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>GrokLaw</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...Budget - The act would allow the USPTO greater freedom in setting its fees, but one of the key differences between S.23 and H.R.1249 is budgetary authority. S.23 would set the USPTO up largely as a self-funding agency with no Congressional oversight of &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20110624140625385&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>News brief 26ROLLCALL_S</title>
    <link href="http://www.thenewstribune.com/2011/06/26/1721122/news-brief-26rollcalls.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-26:/commentary/11023968</id>
    <updated>2011-06-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>TheNewsTribune.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 (HR 1249) Voting yes: Inslee, Larsen, Herrera Beutler, Hastings, McMorris Rodgers, Dicks, McDermott, Reichert, Smith. Economic Development Dispute: Senators refused, 49-51, to take up a bill (S 782) to renew the Economic Development Administration ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenewstribune.com/2011/06/26/1721122/news-brief-26rollcalls.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Area Votes in Congress | Philadelphia Inquirer | 2011-06-26</title>
    <link href="http://www.philly.com/philly/news/124552503.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-26:/commentary/11023743</id>
    <updated>2011-06-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Philadelphia Inquirer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Voting 304-117, the House Thursday approved the first overhaul of US patent law since 1952, a bill (HR 1249) that would help the US Patent and Trademark Office reduce its backlog of 700000 applications. The bill switches from a &amp;quot;first to invent&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.philly.com/philly/news/124552503.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How SC members of Congress voted, week ending June 24</title>
    <link href="http://www.goupstate.com/article/20110626/WIRE/110629788/1051/sitemaps" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-26:/commentary/11023742</id>
    <updated>2011-06-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Spartanburg Herald Journal</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 (HR 1249) Executive Branch Czars: Senators defeated, 47-51, a bid to defund any &amp;quot;czar&amp;quot; position created by presidents to avoid the Senate confirmation process. Critics say President Obama has done just that in naming czars for policies such as t&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goupstate.com/article/20110626/WIRE/110629788/1051/sitemaps&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How they voted (June 26)</title>
    <link href="http://www.lcsun-news.com/las_cruces-news/ci_18355619" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-26:/commentary/11023741</id>
    <updated>2011-06-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Las Cruces Sun-News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &#8226;H RES 316 Providing for consideration of the bill (HR 2021) to amend the Clean Air Act regarding air pollution from Outer Continental Shelf activities, and providing for consideration of the bill (HR 1249) to amend title 35, United States Code, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lcsun-news.com/las_cruces-news/ci_18355619&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Process Revamping in the United States</title>
    <link href="http://www.castleink.com/_a-new-us-patent-legislation-150.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-25:/commentary/11023963</id>
    <updated>2011-06-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Castle Ink</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The full text of the bill, HR 1249, or, the America Invents Act, is available for the public at http://judiciary.house.gov/issues/Patent%20Reform%20PDFS/BILLS-112hr1249rh.pdf. The LA Times article cited above also provides some good perspective on this ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.castleink.com/_a-new-us-patent-legislation-150.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How Texans voted in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7627156.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-25:/commentary/11023723</id>
    <updated>2011-06-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Houston Chronicle</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Patent-Law Overhaul: Approved, 304-117, the first overhaul of US patent law since 1952, a bill (HR 1249) that would help the United States Patent and Trademark Office reduce its backlog of 700000 applications. The bill switches from a &amp;quot;first to inven&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7627156.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How they voted</title>
    <link href="http://posttrib.suntimes.com/news/6168991-418/how-they-voted.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-25:/commentary/11023722</id>
    <updated>2011-06-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Post-Tribune</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 GRACE PERIOD FOR PATENT APPLICANTS: The House rejected an amendment to the America Invents Act (HR 1249). The amendment would have established a first-to-file system for granting patents only after a presidential finding that other nations have ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://posttrib.suntimes.com/news/6168991-418/how-they-voted.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage by House of H.R. 1249 Is a Setback for Inventors, Small Businesses and ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.sys-con.com/node/1887086" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-24:/commentary/11023745</id>
    <updated>2011-06-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>SYS-CON Media (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 NEW YORK, NY -- (Marketwire) -- 06/24/11 -- Passage by the House of Representatives of the &amp;quot;America Invents Act&amp;quot; (HR 1249) is a setback for inventors according to American Innovators for Patent Reform (AIPR), an advocacy group for inventors and &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sys-con.com/node/1887086&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Foley &amp;amp; Lardner LLP | House Passes Patent Reform Bill (H.R. 1249) by 304 to ...</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2126071" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-24:/commentary/11023744</id>
    <updated>2011-06-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Following earlier approval by the Senate on March 8, 2011 of a patent reform bill (S. 23) (see http://tinyurl.com/4sq5thf), the House today approved the America Invents Act by a vote of 304 to 117 (HR 1249) (see http://tinyurl.com/692hqx5). ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2126071&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Edwards Angell Palmer &amp;amp; Dodge | Congressional Update - House Passes Patent ...</title>
    <link href="http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2126067" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-24:/commentary/11023725</id>
    <updated>2011-06-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Linex Legal (press release) (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 After more than a week of negotiations to settle an intra-party dispute over patent fees, House Republicans were able to bring their patent overhaul legislation &#8211; HR 1249 &#8211; to the floor for debate on June 22 and 23. The bill passed by a vote of 304-11&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.linexlegal.com/contents/view/2126067&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IBM Commends House Approval of Patent Reform Legislation; Urges Quick Adoption</title>
    <link href="http://www.reviewseeker.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=1562154" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-24:/commentary/11023724</id>
    <updated>2011-06-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Review seeker (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 HR 1249 will improve the US patent system and spur innovation By PR Newswire ARMONK, NY, June 23, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- IBM (NYSE: IBM) today praised passage of The America Invents Act (HR 1249) by the US House of Representatives, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reviewseeker.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=1562154&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Today in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/06/24/988181/-Today-in-Congress" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-24:/commentary/11022829</id>
    <updated>2011-06-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Kos</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Rooney - Armed Services) (Subject to a Rule) HR 1249 - America Invents Act (Rep. Smith (TX) &#8211; Judiciary/Budget) (304 - 117) HR 2219 - Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2012(Rep. Young (FL) - Appropriations) Roll call vote on the Vitter ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/06/24/988181/-Today-in-Congress&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Anthony Malakian, deputy editor, Buy-Side Technology</title>
    <link href="http://www.waterstechnology.com/buy-side-technology/opinion/2081579/patent-regulation-pending" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-24:/commentary/11022827</id>
    <updated>2011-06-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>www.waterstechnology.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 So upon perusing some press releases I got excited when I came across a statement from Steven Borsand, executive vice president of intellectual property for Trading Technologies (TT), on the dangers of congressional bill HR 1249-or, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.waterstechnology.com/buy-side-technology/opinion/2081579/patent-regulation-pending&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How they voted: Maine&amp;#39;s congressional delegation, June 17-23, 2011</title>
    <link href="http://bangordailynews.com/2011/06/24/politics/how-they-voted-maine%E2%80%99s-congressional-delegation-june-17-23-2011/?ref=latest" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-24:/commentary/11022826</id>
    <updated>2011-06-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bangor Daily News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 John Conyers, D-Mich., to the America Invents Act (HR 1249). The amendment would have established a first-to-file system for granting patents only after a presidential finding that other nations have authorized a one-year grace period in which an ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bangordailynews.com/2011/06/24/politics/how-they-voted-maine%E2%80%99s-congressional-delegation-june-17-23-2011/?ref=latest&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>More Reaction to Passage of the America Invents Act (HR 1249)</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/06/24/more-reaction-to-passage-of-the-america-invents-act-h-r-1249/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-24:/commentary/11022825</id>
    <updated>2011-06-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 There&amp;#39;s more reaction to the passage of The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, HR 1249, by the House of Representatives. The Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) came out in support of the bill. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/06/24/more-reaction-to-passage-of-the-america-invents-act-h-r-1249/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House Passes HR 1249</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/house-passes-hr-1249.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-24:/commentary/11021500</id>
    <updated>2011-06-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House of Representatives earlier today passed HR 1249, the America Invents Act, by a 304-117 vote. All told, 168 Republicans and 136 Democrats voted in favor of the bill and 67 Republicans and 50 Democrats voted against the ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/house-passes-hr-1249.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IBM Commends House Approval of Patent Reform Legislation; Urges Quick Adoption</title>
    <link href="http://www.sacbee.com/2011/06/23/3723479/ibm-commends-house-approval-of.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-23:/commentary/11027867</id>
    <updated>2011-06-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sacramento Bee</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 By IBM ARMONK, NY, June 23, 2011 -- /PRNewswire/ -- IBM (NYSE: IBM) today praised passage of The America Invents Act (HR 1249) by the US House of Representatives, which will significantly improve the US patent system, enhance American competitiveness ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacbee.com/2011/06/23/3723479/ibm-commends-house-approval-of.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>US Patent Reform Advances Furthest In Congress In 10 Years</title>
    <link href="http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2011/06/24/us-patent-reform-advances-furthest-in-congress-in-10-years/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-23:/commentary/11022828</id>
    <updated>2011-06-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Watch (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The US House of Representatives this evening passed HR 1249 &#8211; the closest action patent reform has come to being enacted into law in the past 10 years. But there were some changes made to the bill. Available only for IP-Watch Subscribers. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2011/06/24/us-patent-reform-advances-furthest-in-congress-in-10-years/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Education</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=843c4008-7cff-4326-ba2e-ec0a23dbdbfa" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-23:/commentary/11021463</id>
    <updated>2011-06-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 After opposition by key Republican House leaders concerning language included in Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith&amp;#39;s (R-TX) patent overhaul bill (HR 1249) surfaced, negotiations quickly got under way to find a compromise on how to handle the fees ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=843c4008-7cff-4326-ba2e-ec0a23dbdbfa&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Techcomm</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=54527613-9914-4f42-b207-68ec23c3dc6a" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-23:/commentary/11021462</id>
    <updated>2011-06-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In a June 13 &#8220;Dear Colleague letter,&#8221; former House Judiciary Committee Chairmen John Conyers (D-MI) and James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) called on their colleagues to oppose HR 1249, the America Invents Act. Joined by former Small Business Committee Chairma&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=54527613-9914-4f42-b207-68ec23c3dc6a&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BIO Praises House Passage of Patent Reform Legislation</title>
    <link href="http://www.istockanalyst.com/business/news/5251838/bio-praises-house-passage-of-patent-reform-legislation" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-23:/commentary/11021461</id>
    <updated>2011-06-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>istockAnalyst.com (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 23, 2011 (Business Wire) -- Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) President and CEO Jim Greenwood released the following statement on the passage of The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, HR 1249, by the House of Representatives: &#8220;Small biotechnology &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.istockanalyst.com/business/news/5251838/bio-praises-house-passage-of-patent-reform-legislation&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AICPA Opposes Grandfathering of Pending Tax Strategy Patents</title>
    <link href="http://www.accountingtoday.com/news/AICPA-Opposes-Grandfathering-Pending-Tax-Strategy-Patents-58943-1.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-23:/commentary/11021460</id>
    <updated>2011-06-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Accounting Today</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Senate passed its version of the legislation, S. 23, by a vote of 95-5 in March, and the White House has signaled its support of HR 1249, the legislation now being considered in the House. The legislation bans tax strategy patents by deeming any ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.accountingtoday.com/news/AICPA-Opposes-Grandfathering-Pending-Tax-Strategy-Patents-58943-1.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Big Government Patent Bill: Guest Essay By John Duffy</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/06/the-big-government-patent-bill-guest-essay-by-john-duffy.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-23:/commentary/11021459</id>
    <updated>2011-06-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patently-O</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 There are many sophisticated and nuanced reasons to oppose HR 1249, the 140-page patent bill currently pending before the House of Representatives, but the clearest reason for opposition can be stated in quite simple and stark terms: The proposed ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/06/the-big-government-patent-bill-guest-essay-by-john-duffy.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>HR 1249, the America Invents Act, Passes in the House</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/06/23/h-r-1249-the-america-invents-act-passes-in-the-house/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-23:/commentary/11021458</id>
    <updated>2011-06-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 HR 1249, the America Invents Act, passed the House today with bipartisan support. The Senate passed its version of the bill (S. 23) on March 8 th by a vote of 95 to 5. &#8220;We need to make it easier for companies to innovate and ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/06/23/h-r-1249-the-america-invents-act-passes-in-the-house/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Trading Technologies International, Inc.: The &#8220;America Invents Act&#8221; is Bad for ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.bradenton.com/2011/06/21/3292135/trading-technologies-international.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-22:/commentary/11055477</id>
    <updated>2011-06-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bradenton Herald</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Steven F. Borsand, Executive Vice President Intellectual Property for Trading Technologies International, Inc. (TT), issued a statement today that takes a hardline position on the controversial bill HR 1249, the &#8220;America Invents Act&#8221;, which goes befor&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradenton.com/2011/06/21/3292135/trading-technologies-international.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NRF Supports Patent Bill Provision to Reduce Meritless Lawsuits</title>
    <link href="http://www.bradenton.com/2011/06/21/3291930/nrf-supports-patent-bill-provision.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-22:/commentary/11031611</id>
    <updated>2011-06-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bradenton Herald</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The letter supports Section 18 of HR 1249, the America Invents Act, which would ensure that retail industry revenues go to creating jobs and bringing innovations to consumers rather than paying litigation costs from meritless patent infringement ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradenton.com/2011/06/21/3291930/nrf-supports-patent-bill-provision.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Bill Will Crush Small-Business Innovation</title>
    <link href="http://www.sacbee.com/2011/06/22/3720163/patent-reform-bill-will-crush.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-22:/commentary/11027868</id>
    <updated>2011-06-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sacramento Bee</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 By National Small Business Association WASHINGTON, June 22, 2011 -- /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- NSBA is urging the House to reject the America Invents Act (HR 1249). This legislation will irreversibly damage the ability of small-business owners and ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacbee.com/2011/06/22/3720163/patent-reform-bill-will-crush.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BitTorrent, Patent Reform, Best Buy: Intellectual Property</title>
    <link href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/06/22/bloomberg1376-LN5S0N0YHQ1001-4OI5KPTFMQNJI32I5HM41NRVQC.DTL" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-22:/commentary/11019862</id>
    <updated>2011-06-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>San Francisco Chronicle</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Guaranteed access to all the fees collected by the agency is the cornerstone of a wide-ranging bill, HR 1249, that mirrors a measure passed by the Senate on a 95-5 vote in March. If passed, the legislation would mark the biggest change to the US patent ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/06/22/bloomberg1376-LN5S0N0YHQ1001-4OI5KPTFMQNJI32I5HM41NRVQC.DTL&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dems oppose weak patent fee diversion language in patent reform bill</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/168023-dems-oppose-weak-patent-fee-diversion-language-in-patent-reform-bill" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-22:/commentary/11019861</id>
    <updated>2011-06-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 argued repeatedly that the bill, HR 1249, would require USPTO fees to stay within PTO. He said that these funds would still be subject to appropriation by Congress, and would ensure that these fees stay within USPTO even they exceed the appropriations. ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/168023-dems-oppose-weak-patent-fee-diversion-language-in-patent-reform-bill&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>From first to invent to first to file system if passes in the House</title>
    <link href="http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-las-vegas/from-first-to-invent-to-first-to-file-system-if-passes-the-house" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-22:/commentary/11019788</id>
    <updated>2011-06-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Examiner.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Today in the House of Representatives they are discussing HR 1249, &#8220;America Invents Act&#8221; which would change the way patents are issued to inventors, or may I say applicants. According to the Constitution Congress was given the right to decide how to .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-las-vegas/from-first-to-invent-to-first-to-file-system-if-passes-the-house&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>GOP, Dems split in rare House debate on constitutionality of patent bill</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/168019-gop-dems-split-in-rare-house-debate-on-constitutionality-of-patent-bill" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-22:/commentary/11015481</id>
    <updated>2011-06-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Members began debate on HR 1249, a bill that would mark the first major overhaul of US patent laws in several decades. Because of numerous concerns over the constitutionality of the main piece of the bill, members agreed to hold a separate debate on ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/168019-gop-dems-split-in-rare-house-debate-on-constitutionality-of-patent-bill&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BOEHNER HIGHLIGHTS GOP BILLS TO CREATE JOBS, BOOST ECONOMY</title>
    <link href="http://www.thecypresstimes.com/article/News/National_News/BOEHNER_HIGHLIGHTS_GOP_BILLS_TO_CREATE_JOBS_BOOST_ECONOMY/47061" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-22:/commentary/11015319</id>
    <updated>2011-06-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Cypress Times</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 WASHINGTON, DC - At a press conference with Republican leaders today, Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-West Chester) highlighted two more jobs bills on the House floor this week: the America Invents Act (HR 1249) and the Jobs &amp;amp; Energy Permitting .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecypresstimes.com/article/News/National_News/BOEHNER_HIGHLIGHTS_GOP_BILLS_TO_CREATE_JOBS_BOOST_ECONOMY/47061&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Will Create Jobs, But Patent Fee Tussle Takes Precedence</title>
    <link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CapitalGainsAndGames/~3/vUkr3WrHMDI/patent-reform-will-create-jobs-patent-fee-tussle-takes-precedence" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-22:/commentary/11015152</id>
    <updated>2011-06-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Capital Gains and Games</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...agenda for years. &#160; A compromise, S.23, passed the Senate on March 8 by an overwhelming 95-5 vote, and the House is about to pass H.R.1249 late this week. &#160;However, a battle over whether all patent fees must be used to fund the Patent Office may derai&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CapitalGainsAndGames/~3/vUkr3WrHMDI/patent-reform-will-create-jobs-patent-fee-tussle-takes-precedence&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Bill Will Crush Small-Business Innovation</title>
    <link href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/patent-reform-bill-will-crush-small-business-innovation-124371408.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-22:/commentary/11015151</id>
    <updated>2011-06-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PR Newswire (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 WASHINGTON, June 22, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- NSBA is urging the House to reject the America Invents Act (HR 1249). This legislation will irreversibly damage the ability of small-business owners and entrepreneurs to create, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/patent-reform-bill-will-crush-small-business-innovation-124371408.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Legislative update: Illinois General Assembly returns to session today ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.niutoday.info/2011/06/22/legislative-update-illinois-general-assembly-returns-to-session-today-capital-bill-awaits/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-22:/commentary/11015054</id>
    <updated>2011-06-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NIU Today</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Finally, HR 1249, the America Invents Act intended to reform the US patent system, ran into some problems last week over the provision that would allow the US Patent and Trademark Office to keep all of the fees it collects to fund its operations. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.niutoday.info/2011/06/22/legislative-update-illinois-general-assembly-returns-to-session-today-capital-bill-awaits/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Debate: Live Updates From The US House Of Representatives</title>
    <link href="http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2011/06/22/patent-reform-debate-live-updates-from-the-us-house-of-representatives/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-22:/commentary/11015053</id>
    <updated>2011-06-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Watch (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Intellectual Property Watch is providing play-by-play action from the today&amp;#39;s floor debate of HR 1249, the bill to reform US patent law which is facing a fight. For IP-Watch Subscribers. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2011/06/22/patent-reform-debate-live-updates-from-the-us-house-of-representatives/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House approves rule for patent, drilling bills</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/167877-house-approves-rule-for-patent-drilling-bills" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-22:/commentary/11015052</id>
    <updated>2011-06-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In addition to allowing for consideration of the patent bill, HR 1249, it allows for consideration of a bill aimed at easing Alaska offshore drilling permits, HR 2021. Much of the Democratic opposition to the rule was related to the waiver of the ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/167877-house-approves-rule-for-patent-drilling-bills&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rep. Conyers&amp;#39; Dear Colleague Letter Opposing Patent Legislation</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/06/22/rep-conyers-dear-colleague-letter-opposing-patent-legislation/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-22:/commentary/11015050</id>
    <updated>2011-06-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Please join us in opposing HR 1249. While we may have different concerns with the legislation, as Members of Congress including two former Chairs of the House Judiciary Committee, a former Chair of the Small Business Committee, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/06/22/rep-conyers-dear-colleague-letter-opposing-patent-legislation/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Update II</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/patent-reform-update-ii.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-22:/commentary/11015013</id>
    <updated>2011-06-22T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In a statement released earlier today, the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) reaffirmed its support for HR 1249 and urged the House to pass the bill this week. BIO President and CEO Jim Greenwood noted that the organization ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/patent-reform-update-ii.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Trading Technologies International, Inc.: The &amp;quot;America Invents Act&amp;quot; is Bad for ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.istockanalyst.com/business/news/5246045/trading-technologies-international-inc-the-america-invents-act-is-bad-for-the-economy" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-21:/commentary/11054440</id>
    <updated>2011-06-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>istockAnalyst.com (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 (Source: Business Wire)Steven F. Borsand, Executive Vice President Intellectual Property for Trading Technologies International, Inc. (TT), issued a statement today that takes a hardline position on the controversial bill HR 1249, the &amp;quot;America Invent&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.istockanalyst.com/business/news/5246045/trading-technologies-international-inc-the-america-invents-act-is-bad-for-the-economy&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform or Patent Ripoff?</title>
    <link href="http://www.redstate.com/danarohrabacher/2011/06/21/patent-reform-or-patent-ripoff/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-21:/commentary/11019860</id>
    <updated>2011-06-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>RedState</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 HR 1249 is in reality designed to transform America&amp;#39;s patent system into one that is more like the patent systems in Europe and Asia. It&amp;#39;s called harmonization and it won&amp;#39;t work to the interests of the American people anymore than remodeling o&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/danarohrabacher/2011/06/21/patent-reform-or-patent-ripoff/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Small Business Organizations Urge Substantial Amendments to House Version of ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.benzinga.com/press-releases/11/06/b1186095/small-business-organizations-urge-substantial-amendments-to-house-vers" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-21:/commentary/11015058</id>
    <updated>2011-06-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Benzinga</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The organizations&amp;#39; letter said that by removing most sections of the House bill HR 1249, the amendment offered by Representatives John Conyers, James Sensenbrenner and Don Manzullo would eliminate many harmful provisions in the bill that, if enacted, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.benzinga.com/press-releases/11/06/b1186095/small-business-organizations-urge-substantial-amendments-to-house-vers&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>This week in Washington - June 17, 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=8d328cfe-e79c-4b9b-a94d-c8f7bf554c21" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-21:/commentary/11015057</id>
    <updated>2011-06-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Opposition by key Republican House leaders surfaced last week concerning language included in Judiciary Chair Lamar Smith&amp;#39;s (R-Texas) patent overhaul bill (HR 1249). Lawmakers quickly began working on a compromise to resolve issues related to the fees&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=8d328cfe-e79c-4b9b-a94d-c8f7bf554c21&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House Nearing Completion of Patent Office Overhaul</title>
    <link href="http://www.ocala.com/article/20110622/ZNYT05/106223009/1005/sports01?Title=House-Nearing-Completion-of-Patent-Office-Overhaul" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-21:/commentary/11015056</id>
    <updated>2011-06-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Ocala</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The agreement between leaders of the House Judiciary and Appropriations committees clears the way for the bill, HR 1249, to be brought to the House floor as soon as Wednesday, when other amendments also will be considered. The bill generally updates ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ocala.com/article/20110622/ZNYT05/106223009/1005/sports01?Title=House-Nearing-Completion-of-Patent-Office-Overhaul&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Schlafly: Patent Reform Bill Still an Unconstitutional Attack on Small Business</title>
    <link href="http://www.sunherald.com/2011/06/21/3214119/schlafly-patent-reform-bill-still.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-21:/commentary/11015055</id>
    <updated>2011-06-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>SunHerald.com (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Another Constitutional concern lies in Section 18 of HR 1249, which contains a provision that subjects an existing patent for electronic check processing to retroactive attack in order to allow big banks to use the technology without paying for it. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sunherald.com/2011/06/21/3214119/schlafly-patent-reform-bill-still.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Schlafly: Patent Reform Bill Still an Unconstitutional Attack on Small Business</title>
    <link href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/schlafly-patent-reform-bill-still-an-unconstitutional-attack-on-small-business-124303669.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-21:/commentary/11015051</id>
    <updated>2011-06-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PR Newswire (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Another Constitutional concern lies in Section 18 of HR 1249, which contains a provision that subjects an existing patent for electronic check processing to retroactive attack in order to allow big banks to use the technology without paying for it. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/schlafly-patent-reform-bill-still-an-unconstitutional-attack-on-small-business-124303669.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Trading Technologies International, Inc.: The &amp;quot;America Invents Act&amp;quot; is Bad for ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/-trading-technologies-international-inc-america-invents-act-bad-/2011/06/21/5588905.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-21:/commentary/11015014</id>
    <updated>2011-06-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>TMC Net</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Steven F. Borsand, Executive Vice President Intellectual Property for Trading Technologies International, Inc. (TT), issued a statement today that takes a hardline position on the controversial bill HR 1249, the &amp;quot;America Invents Act&amp;quot;, which goes&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/-trading-technologies-international-inc-america-invents-act-bad-/2011/06/21/5588905.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The patent truth</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/167569-the-patent-truth" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-21:/commentary/11014982</id>
    <updated>2011-06-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 S23 passed 95-5 in the Senate in January and HR 1249 seems to be on track to be called in the House in the next few days. And now suddenly there is pushback. Congressmen are confused. Staffers are confused. The public is largely unaware and the ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/167569-the-patent-truth&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform is long overdue</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/lawmaker-news/167549-patent-reform-is-long-overdue" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-21:/commentary/11014980</id>
    <updated>2011-06-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Unfortunately, as matters presently stand, this provision is likely to be stripped from the pending patent legislation, HR 1249, before it reaches the House floor. The remaining legislation is mostly a hodge-podge of industry-specific provisions that ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/lawmaker-news/167549-patent-reform-is-long-overdue&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The America Invents Act is bad for the economy</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-a-budget/167565-the-america-invents-act-is-bad-for-the-economy" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-21:/commentary/11014979</id>
    <updated>2011-06-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 We know from real world experience that HR 1249 as currently drafted is bad for the economy. Like many companies, TT invests millions of dollars every year on R&amp;amp;D. The patent system is what permits us &#8211; as well as all innovators (including individua&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-a-budget/167565-the-america-invents-act-is-bad-for-the-economy&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The patent truth</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/campaign/167569-the-patent-truth" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-21:/commentary/11014978</id>
    <updated>2011-06-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 S23 passed 95-5 in the Senate in January and HR 1249 seems to be on track to be called in the House in the next few days. And now suddenly there is pushback. Congressmen are confused. Staffers are confused. The public is largely unaware and the ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/campaign/167569-the-patent-truth&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress.org: How Hawaii&#8217;s Elected Officials Voted &#8211; June 20, 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.hawaiireporter.com/congress-org-how-hawaiis-elected-officials-voted-june-20-2011/123" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-21:/commentary/11013375</id>
    <updated>2011-06-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Hawaii Reporter</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senate: Nomination of Leon E. Panetta to be Defense Secretary
Senate: Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011
Senate: Economic Development Revitalization Act of 2011
House: Defense Appropriations
House: America Invents Act
 Ethan&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hawaiireporter.com/congress-org-how-hawaiis-elected-officials-voted-june-20-2011/123&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How your Congressman voted</title>
    <link href="http://www.dcourier.com/Main.asp?SectionID=1&amp;amp;SubSectionID=1&amp;amp;ArticleID=95166" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-21:/commentary/11013357</id>
    <updated>2011-06-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Daily Courier</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
...work on this bill that would provide the Defense Department with $648.7 billion for the 2012 fiscal year. America Invents Act -H.R.1249 The House may also take up this bill that would overhaul the U.S. patent system.        			 				Article comments are &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dcourier.com/Main.asp?SectionID=1&amp;amp;SubSectionID=1&amp;amp;ArticleID=95166&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Update</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/patent-reform-update.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-21:/commentary/11013355</id>
    <updated>2011-06-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 HR 1249 Floor Debate to Take Place Later This Week? In today&amp;#39;s IPO Daily News, the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) reported that floor debate of the House version of the &amp;quot;America Invents Act&amp;quot; (HR 1249) is now scheduled ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/patent-reform-update.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>This Week in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/06/20/986859/-This-Week-in-Congress" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-20:/commentary/11034914</id>
    <updated>2011-06-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Kos</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On Friday, the House will meet at 9:00 am for legislative business with last votes no later than 3:00 pm HR 1249 &#8211; America Invents Act (Rep. Smith (TX) &#8211; Judiciary/Budget) (Subject to a Rule) HR 2021 - Jobs and Energy Permitting Act of 2011 (Rep. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/06/20/986859/-This-Week-in-Congress&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House Insists on its Prerogative of Fee Diversion [Call Your Representative If ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/06/20/house-insists-on-its-prerogative-of-fee-diversion-call-your-representative-if-you-think-differently/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-20:/commentary/11030421</id>
    <updated>2011-06-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Say these words: &#8220;Please vote no on the rule for the patent bill, HR 1249, and vote no on final passage.&#8221; (&#8220;Vote no on the rule&#8221; means &#8220;don&amp;#39;t allow the bill to come to the floor for a vote.&#8221;) The person that answers the phone will not know&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/06/20/house-insists-on-its-prerogative-of-fee-diversion-call-your-representative-if-you-think-differently/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Give patent office money to support innovation in US</title>
    <link href="http://www.journaltimes.com/news/opinion/editorial/article_05bc4acc-9b90-11e0-b151-001cc4c002e0.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-20:/commentary/11010985</id>
    <updated>2011-06-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Journal Times</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 It is called the America Invents Act, but some very odd opposition to this piece of federal legislation almost guarantees to make it the America May Eventually Invent Act. This bill &#8212; HR 1249 in the House of Representatives &#8212; is a major reworking of .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.journaltimes.com/news/opinion/editorial/article_05bc4acc-9b90-11e0-b151-001cc4c002e0.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Education</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=cc48d14f-358e-4d01-a119-07a7c95dc7eb" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-20:/commentary/11010957</id>
    <updated>2011-06-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In a June 6 letter sent to House Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX), Budget Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Appropriations Chairman Harold Rogers (R-KY) expressed opposition to language included in Smith&amp;#39;s patent overhaul bill (HR 1249), ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=cc48d14f-358e-4d01-a119-07a7c95dc7eb&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Recapping Last Week in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.congressmatters.com/story/2011/6/20/2767/-This-Week-in-Congress" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-20:/commentary/11010956</id>
    <updated>2011-06-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Congress Matters</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On Friday, the House will meet at 9:00 am for legislative business with last votes no later than 3:00 pm HR 1249 &#8211; America Invents Act (Rep. Smith (TX) &#8211; Judiciary/Budget) (Subject to a Rule) HR 2021 - Jobs and Energy Permitting Act of 2011 (Rep. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.congressmatters.com/story/2011/6/20/2767/-This-Week-in-Congress&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The week ahead on the Hill: Senate votes on Panetta, Petraeus testifies, and ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/the-week-ahead-on-the-hill-senate-votes-on-panetta-petraeus-testifies-and-the-biden-group-steps-up-the-pace-again/2011/06/19/AG96ObcH_blog.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-20:/commentary/11010955</id>
    <updated>2011-06-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Washington Post (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House is in session at 10 am Three measures are on the agenda: HR 1249, the America Invents Act; HR 2021, the Jobs and Energy Permitting Act of 2011; and HR 2219, the 2012 defense appropriations bill. There is also a possibility that the House may ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/the-week-ahead-on-the-hill-senate-votes-on-panetta-petraeus-testifies-and-the-biden-group-steps-up-the-pace-again/2011/06/19/AG96ObcH_blog.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform and the Constitution</title>
    <link href="http://blogs.forbes.com/merrillmatthews/2011/06/20/patent-reform-and-the-constitution/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-20:/commentary/11010954</id>
    <updated>2011-06-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Forbes (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &#8220;Placing PTO spending on mandatory auto-pilot as outlined in HR 1249 [ie, the America Invents Act] would also hand the Congressional &amp;#39;power of the purse&amp;#39;&#8212;bestowed in the Constitution&#8212;to the Obama White House, and essentially eliminate the ab&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.forbes.com/merrillmatthews/2011/06/20/patent-reform-and-the-constitution/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dispatch from the Front: The Week of June 20</title>
    <link href="http://shopfloor.org/2011/06/dispatch-from-the-front-the-week-of-june-20-2/21697" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-20:/commentary/11010953</id>
    <updated>2011-06-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Shopfloor</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Later in the week, the House could consider patent reform (HR 1249), an energy measure (HR 2021) and defense appropriations (HR 2219). The temporary Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) bill expires at the end of this month, so there could be action ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://shopfloor.org/2011/06/dispatch-from-the-front-the-week-of-june-20-2/21697&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Is the End of Fee Diversion Dead in the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act?</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/is-the-end-of-fee-diversion-dead-in-the-leahy-smith-america-invents-act.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-19:/commentary/11010784</id>
    <updated>2011-06-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Say these words: &amp;quot;Please vote no on the rule for the patent bill, HR 1249, and vote no on final passage.&amp;quot; (&amp;quot;Vote no on the rule&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;don&amp;#39;t allow the bill to come to the floor for a vote.&amp;quot;) The person that answers the p&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/is-the-end-of-fee-diversion-dead-in-the-leahy-smith-america-invents-act.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patently Offensive: Human Beings Are Not Property</title>
    <link href="http://www.lifenews.com/2011/06/17/patently-offensive-human-beings-are-not-property/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-17:/commentary/11006580</id>
    <updated>2011-06-17T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>LifeNews.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Whatever other merits or defects the new bill may have, the America Invents Act (HR 1249)[1] raises a serious pro-life concern. If it is passed, an existing policy restriction against the patenting of human organisms will disappear. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lifenews.com/2011/06/17/patently-offensive-human-beings-are-not-property/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AMA, ACLU and Their Friends Oppose (Leahy-Smith) America Invents Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/ama-aclu-and-their-friends-oppose-leahy-smith-america-invents-act.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-17:/commentary/11005255</id>
    <updated>2011-06-17T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 John Conyers, the Ranking Member, both the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the American Medical Association (AMA) opposed HR 1249. While on first blush the basis of their opposition may be surprising (Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz&amp;#39;s (D-FL) .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/ama-aclu-and-their-friends-oppose-leahy-smith-america-invents-act.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>COMMENTARY: Patent Office, not Congress, should get patent fees</title>
    <link href="http://www.themorningsun.com/articles/2011/06/16/opinion/srv0000012059578.txt" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-16:/commentary/11002016</id>
    <updated>2011-06-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Morning Sun</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Prospects for passage of HR 1249, the America Invents Act, are unclear. But whether the broader bill is eventually adopted or not, Congress should adopt a hands-off policy on patent fees. Ryan has it exactly wrong. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.themorningsun.com/articles/2011/06/16/opinion/srv0000012059578.txt&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Recapping yesterday&amp;#39;s action:</title>
    <link href="http://www.congressmatters.com/story/2011/6/16/2766/-Today-in-Congress" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-16:/commentary/11002015</id>
    <updated>2011-06-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Congress Matters</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The patent bill (the America Invents Act, HR 1249), once considered a possibility for floor time this week, looks like it&amp;#39;ll be pushed off for later. The Senate adopted S. Res 208, which is awesome news for Mongolia. You remember from yesterday, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.congressmatters.com/story/2011/6/16/2766/-Today-in-Congress&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Today in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/06/16/985542/-Today-in-Congress" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-16:/commentary/11002014</id>
    <updated>2011-06-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Kos</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The patent bill (the America Invents Act, HR 1249), once considered a possibility for floor time this week, looks like it&amp;#39;ll be pushed off for later. The Senate adopted S. Res 208, which is awesome news for Mongolia. You remember from yesterday, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/06/16/985542/-Today-in-Congress&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House adjourns for the week, readies patent, energy bills</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/166921-house-adjourns-for-the-week-readies-patent-energy-bills" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-16:/commentary/11002013</id>
    <updated>2011-06-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The patent bill is HR 1249, the America Invents Act. While the Senate has already passed a similar version of this bill, it is somewhat controversial, for several different reasons. Several of these issues were pointed out in a dear colleague letter ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/166921-house-adjourns-for-the-week-readies-patent-energy-bills&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate over HR 1249 Continues</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/debate-over-hr-1249-continues.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-16:/commentary/11001458</id>
    <updated>2011-06-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On Tuesday, the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) reported that the House Rules Committee meeting to determine how the floor debate on HR 1249 would be conducted, originally scheduled for that day, had been postponed. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/debate-over-hr-1249-continues.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A patently better system</title>
    <link href="http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/06/16/1276077/a-patently-better-system.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-15:/commentary/11014981</id>
    <updated>2011-06-15T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>News &amp;amp; Observer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The America Invents Act (HR 1249) deserves strong support from elected leaders in North Carolina. It will improve the Patent Office&amp;#39;s operations, enhance the quality of patents, and provide resources to begin reducing the application backlog. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/06/16/1276077/a-patently-better-system.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&amp;#39;Red State&amp;#39; posts primer on patent reform legislation</title>
    <link href="http://www.prnewschannel.com/2011/06/15/red-state-posts-primer-on-patent-reform-legislation/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-15:/commentary/11001452</id>
    <updated>2011-06-15T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PR NewsChannel (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 HR 1249 mandates patents not be awarded to the inventor of new technology and could be voted on as soon as Thursday. Red State (www.redstate.com), the most widely read right of center blog on Capitol Hill, published a primer on Patent Reform ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prnewschannel.com/2011/06/15/red-state-posts-primer-on-patent-reform-legislation/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Manager&amp;#39;s Amendment (and Others) to HR 1249 -- Human Patenting</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/managers-amendment-and-others-to-hr-1249-human-patenting.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-15:/commentary/11001451</id>
    <updated>2011-06-15T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Lamar Smith (R-TX) to convince his brethren on the Appropriations Committee that the provisions of HR 1249 (formerly the &amp;quot;America Invents Act,&amp;quot; now the &amp;quot;Leahy-Smith America Invents Act&amp;quot;) that would put an end to patent fee diversion do&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/managers-amendment-and-others-to-hr-1249-human-patenting.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Will Tax Strategy Patents Be Outlawed?</title>
    <link href="http://blogs.forbes.com/robertwood/2011/06/15/will-tax-strategy-patents-be-outlawed/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-15:/commentary/10997129</id>
    <updated>2011-06-15T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Forbes (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 See Comparison of Key Provisions of S. 23 and HR 1249. Why is there so much anxiety about allowing tax patents? There are several answers. One is that taxation is fundamentally about complying with the law. The idea that someone could come up with a ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.forbes.com/robertwood/2011/06/15/will-tax-strategy-patents-be-outlawed/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Life Sciences Sector Calls on Pence&amp;#39;s Support</title>
    <link href="http://www.insideindianabusiness.com/newsitem.asp?ID=48225" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-15:/commentary/10997128</id>
    <updated>2011-06-15T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Inside INdiana Business (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 We strongly support the &#8220;America Invents Act,&#8221; HR 1249. We urge you to vote in favor of this important bipartisan legislation when it comes before the full House of Representatives. An especially important element of the bill is its establishment of a&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insideindianabusiness.com/newsitem.asp?ID=48225&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Morning Briefing for June 14, 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2011/06/14/morning-briefing-for-june-14-2011/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-14:/commentary/10996464</id>
    <updated>2011-06-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>RedState</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 So I can understand how the latest version of patent reform&#8212;the America Invents Act (HR 1249)&#8212;came to be scheduled for floor consideration this week. But the conservative movement has been raising serious concerns with key portions of patent reform ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/erick/2011/06/14/morning-briefing-for-june-14-2011/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congressional Bill Would Ban Scientific Patents on Human Beings</title>
    <link href="http://www.lifenews.com/2011/06/14/congressional-bill-would-ban-scientific-patents-on-human-beings/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-14:/commentary/10996463</id>
    <updated>2011-06-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>LifeNews.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 However, language in HR 1249, the America Invents Act, a bill pending in the House of Representatives, will codify an important pro-life policy rider included in the federal appropriations bills since 2004. This amendment, commonly known as the Weldon ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lifenews.com/2011/06/14/congressional-bill-would-ban-scientific-patents-on-human-beings/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Act Stumbles Over Control of Money</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/06/14/patent-reform-act-stumbles-over-control-of-money/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-14:/commentary/10996462</id>
    <updated>2011-06-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The main issue of debate appears to be the US Patent and Trademark Office funding provisions in HR 1249, &#8220;The America Invents Act.&#8221; Section 22 of the Judiciary Committee reported bill allows the USPTO to retain all user fees to use for operations, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/06/14/patent-reform-act-stumbles-over-control-of-money/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Managers&amp;#39; Amendment (and Others) to HR 1249</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/managers-amendment-and-others-to-hr-1249.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-14:/commentary/10996461</id>
    <updated>2011-06-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The question of when HR 1249 (formerly the &amp;quot;America Invents Act,&amp;quot; now the &amp;quot;Leahy-Smith America Invents Act&amp;quot;) will get to a floor vote in the House apparently depends on whether Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) can convince his brethren on ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/managers-amendment-and-others-to-hr-1249.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform News Briefs</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/patent-reform-news-briefs-1.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-14:/commentary/10994763</id>
    <updated>2011-06-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In today&amp;#39;s IPO Daily News, the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) reported that House members are preparing for possible debate and a vote on HR 1249 &amp;quot;as early as this week.&amp;quot; According to the IPO report, the House has ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/patent-reform-news-briefs-1.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Does &#8220;Inventor&#8221; in the Constitution Mean &#8220;First Inventor&#8221;?</title>
    <link href="http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/06/13/does-inventor-in-the-constitution-mean-first-inventor/id=17689/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-13:/commentary/11014983</id>
    <updated>2011-06-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPWatchdog.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 ... in order to twist the word &#8220;inventor&#8221; in the US Constitution to mean &#8220;first inventor,&#8221; which would then call into question the constitutionality of the first to file provisions of patent reform now before the House of Representatives; HR 1249.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/06/13/does-inventor-in-the-constitution-mean-first-inventor/id=17689/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>This Week in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/06/13/984528/-This-Week-in-Congress" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-13:/commentary/11001453</id>
    <updated>2011-06-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Kos</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Kingston &#8211; Appropriations) (Subject to a Rule) Possible Consideration of HR 1249 &#8211; America Invents Act (Rep. Smith (TX) &#8211; Judiciary/Budget) (Subject to a Rule) Following any Leader remarks, the Senate will be in a period of morning business until 6p&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/06/13/984528/-This-Week-in-Congress&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>GE Joins Apple in Urging Congress to Let Patent Office Keep Fees</title>
    <link href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/06/13/bloomberg1376-LMQKV60D9L3501-0BPBOVN4P5MS5NC3J8U8122LJE.DTL" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-13:/commentary/10996506</id>
    <updated>2011-06-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>San Francisco Chronicle</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House measure, HR 1249, similar to a Senate bill passed in March, seeks to end lawmakers&amp;#39; longstanding practice of diverting fees collected by the patent office to steer them toward non-patent purposes. Representative Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/06/13/bloomberg1376-LMQKV60D9L3501-0BPBOVN4P5MS5NC3J8U8122LJE.DTL&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>GOP, Dem members call for rejection of House patent reform bill</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/166073-gop-dem-members-call-for-rejection-of-house-patent-reform-bill" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-13:/commentary/10994764</id>
    <updated>2011-06-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &amp;quot;Several groups oppose HR 1249 because they view the change to first-to-file as a dangerous and unconstitutional effort to overturn 220 years of patent practice,&amp;quot; it said. Elsewhere, the letter rejects attempts to allow retroactive changes to pe&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/166073-gop-dem-members-call-for-rejection-of-house-patent-reform-bill&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Recapping Last Week in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.congressmatters.com/story/2011/6/13/2763/-This-Week-in-Congress" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-13:/commentary/10992347</id>
    <updated>2011-06-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Congress Matters</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Kingston &#8211; Appropriations) (Subject to a Rule) Possible Consideration of HR 1249 &#8211; America Invents Act (Rep. Smith (TX) &#8211; Judiciary/Budget) (Subject to a Rule) Following any Leader remarks, the Senate will be in a period of morning business until 6p&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.congressmatters.com/story/2011/6/13/2763/-This-Week-in-Congress&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dispatch from the Front: The Week of June 13</title>
    <link href="http://shopfloor.org/2011/06/dispatch-from-the-front-the-week-of-june-13/21609" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-13:/commentary/10992346</id>
    <updated>2011-06-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Shopfloor</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Later this week the House may consider patent reform, the America Invents Act (HR 1249). For more on the patent reform bill and what is complicating its House consideration, see here. The Senate passed its patent reform bill in March by a vote of 95 to ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://shopfloor.org/2011/06/dispatch-from-the-front-the-week-of-june-13/21609&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Catch 22: Will Fee Diversion Clause Derail Patent Reform Act?</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/06/13/catch-22-will-fee-diversion-clause-derail-patent-reform-act/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-13:/commentary/10992345</id>
    <updated>2011-06-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Over 150 companies, associations, venture capitalists, unions, universities and innovation-focused entities called on Congress to support keeping the US Patent and Trademark Office funding provisions in HR 1249, &#8220;The America ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/06/13/catch-22-will-fee-diversion-clause-derail-patent-reform-act/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Commentary: Patent reform could stifle start-ups</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/capitalbusiness/commentary-patent-reform-could-stifle-start-ups/2011/06/03/AG5CC0RH_story.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-12:/commentary/10990728</id>
    <updated>2011-06-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Washington Post</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Congress has shown that it is so eager to bypass the garage inventor and small entrepreneur that Senate Bill 23 passed with breakneck speed, while HR 1249 passed in the House Judiciary Committee by a vote of 32 to 3 on the very day the bill was ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/capitalbusiness/commentary-patent-reform-could-stifle-start-ups/2011/06/03/AG5CC0RH_story.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Top 10 Reasons Republicans Might Oppose the Patent Office</title>
    <link href="http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/06/12/top-10-reasons-republicans-might-oppose-the-patent-office/id=17645/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-12:/commentary/10990727</id>
    <updated>2011-06-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPWatchdog.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 All joking aside, it seems that Congressmen Ryan and Rogers have not actually read HR 1249. This is quite ironic in and of itself given Republicans loudly (and correctly) chided Democrats for not having read much of the legislation passed over the ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/06/12/top-10-reasons-republicans-might-oppose-the-patent-office/id=17645/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Schlafly: Congress Is Taking the &amp;#39;Obamacare Approach&amp;#39; to Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.sacbee.com/2011/06/11/3693475/schlafly-congress-is-taking-the.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-11:/commentary/10990730</id>
    <updated>2011-06-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sacramento Bee</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Schlafly added, &amp;quot;Just like Nancy Pelosi said about Obamacare, &amp;#39;We have to pass it so you can find out what&amp;#39;s in it,&amp;#39; HR 1249 supporters are trying to rush the bill through before Congress and the American people realize how bad it is. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacbee.com/2011/06/11/3693475/schlafly-congress-is-taking-the.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Schlafly: Congress Is Taking the &amp;#39;Obamacare Approach&amp;#39; to Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.sunherald.com/2011/06/11/3187168/schlafly-congress-is-taking-the.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-11:/commentary/10986727</id>
    <updated>2011-06-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>SunHerald.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Schlafly added, &amp;quot;Just like Nancy Pelosi said about Obamacare, &amp;#39;We have to pass it so you can find out what&amp;#39;s in it,&amp;#39; HR 1249 supporters are trying to rush the bill through before Congress and the American people realize how bad it is. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sunherald.com/2011/06/11/3187168/schlafly-congress-is-taking-the.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Schlafly: Congress Is Taking the &amp;#39;Obamacare Approach&amp;#39; to Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/schlafly--congress-is-taking-the-obamacare-approach-to-patent-reform-123689284.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-11:/commentary/10986718</id>
    <updated>2011-06-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PR Newswire (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Schlafly added, &amp;quot;Just like Nancy Pelosi said about Obamacare, &amp;#39;We have to pass it so you can find out what&amp;#39;s in it,&amp;#39; HR 1249 supporters are trying to rush the bill through before Congress and the American people realize how bad it is. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/schlafly--congress-is-taking-the-obamacare-approach-to-patent-reform-123689284.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Small Manufacturers Oppose H.R. 1249, the &amp;quot;America Invents Act,&amp;quot; a Bill ...</title>
    <link href="http://gamutnews.com/20110610/20352/small-manufacturers-oppose-h-r-1249-the-america-invents-act-a-bill-unfairly-biased-toward-big-business-and-big-banks.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-10:/commentary/11031646</id>
    <updated>2011-06-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Gamut News (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &#8220;HR 1249 is rife with constitutional and other serious problems and should be pulled from floor consideration at this time,&#8221; said Kevin L. Kearns, president of the USBIC. &#8220;It would be wrong for the House leadership and the White House to try to arra&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gamutnews.com/20110610/20352/small-manufacturers-oppose-h-r-1249-the-america-invents-act-a-bill-unfairly-biased-toward-big-business-and-big-banks.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Small Manufacturers Oppose H.R. 1249, the &#8220;America Invents Act,&#8221; a Bill ...</title>
    <link href="http://eon.businesswire.com/news/eon/20110610005983/en/H.R.-1249/patent-reform/Boehner" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-10:/commentary/10990729</id>
    <updated>2011-06-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>EON: Enhanced Online News (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &#8220;HR 1249 is rife with constitutional and other serious problems and should be pulled from floor consideration at this time,&#8221; said Kevin L. Kearns, president of the USBIC. &#8220;It would be wrong for the House leadership and the White House to try to arra&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://eon.businesswire.com/news/eon/20110610005983/en/H.R.-1249/patent-reform/Boehner&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Small Manufacturers Oppose H.R. 1249, the &amp;quot;America Invents Act,&amp;quot; a Bill ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.benzinga.com/press-releases/11/06/b1158856/small-manufacturers-oppose-h-r-1249-the-america-invents-act-a-bill-unf" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-10:/commentary/10986726</id>
    <updated>2011-06-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Benzinga</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &#8220;HR 1249 is rife with constitutional and other serious problems and should be pulled from floor consideration at this time,&#8221; said Kevin L. Kearns, president of the USBIC. &#8220;It would be wrong for the House leadership and the White House to try to arra&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.benzinga.com/press-releases/11/06/b1158856/small-manufacturers-oppose-h-r-1249-the-america-invents-act-a-bill-unf&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Small Manufacturers Oppose HR 1249, the &#8220;America Invents Act,&#8221; a Bill Unfairly ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.mromagazine.com/press-releases/story.aspx?id=1000471545" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-10:/commentary/10986719</id>
    <updated>2011-06-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>MRO (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &#8220;HR 1249 is rife with constitutional and other serious problems and should be pulled from floor consideration at this time,&#8221; said Kevin L. Kearns, president of the USBIC. &#8220;It would be wrong for the House leadership and the White House to try to arra&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mromagazine.com/press-releases/story.aspx?id=1000471545&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Small Manufacturers Oppose H.R. 1249, the &#8220;America Invents Act,&#8221; a Bill ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.bradenton.com/2011/06/10/3265148/small-manufacturers-oppose-hr.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-10:/commentary/10986398</id>
    <updated>2011-06-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bradenton Herald</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &#8220;HR 1249 is rife with constitutional and other serious problems and should be pulled from floor consideration at this time,&#8221; said Kevin L. Kearns, president of the USBIC. &#8220;It would be wrong for the House leadership and the White House to try to arra&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradenton.com/2011/06/10/3265148/small-manufacturers-oppose-hr.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cantor outlines summer legislative plans</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/165861-cantor-outlines-summer-legislative-plans" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-10:/commentary/10986397</id>
    <updated>2011-06-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On patents, he said there would be a &amp;quot;thorough floor consideration process&amp;quot; on a patent reform bill, HR 1249. That process is expected to start next week. And on energy, he said the House will work on at least two more bills in addition to those&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/165861-cantor-outlines-summer-legislative-plans&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Paul Ryan, Hal Rogers (Rightfully) Oppose Proposed Patent Office Budget Bonanza</title>
    <link href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-b-ravicher/paul-ryan-hal-rogers-patent-office_b_873874.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-10:/commentary/10986396</id>
    <updated>2011-06-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Huffington Post (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 One of the least discussed, and perhaps most arcane, provisions of the currently pending patent reform legislation in Congress known as the &amp;quot;American Invents Act,&amp;quot; HR 1249 would dramatically change the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO)&amp;#39;s fin&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-b-ravicher/paul-ryan-hal-rogers-patent-office_b_873874.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Small Manufacturers Oppose H.R. 1249, the &#8220;America Invents Act,&#8221; a Bill ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110610005979/en/Small-Manufacturers-Oppose-H.R.-1249-%E2%80%9CAmerica-Invents" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-10:/commentary/10986395</id>
    <updated>2011-06-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Business Wire (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &#8220;HR 1249 is rife with constitutional and other serious problems and should be pulled from floor consideration at this time,&#8221; said Kevin L. Kearns, president of the USBIC. &#8220;It would be wrong for the House leadership and the White House to try to arra&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110610005979/en/Small-Manufacturers-Oppose-H.R.-1249-%E2%80%9CAmerica-Invents&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Act Placed in Jeopardy Over Control of Money</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/06/09/patent-reform-act-placed-in-jeopardy-over-control-of-money/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-09:/commentary/10992348</id>
    <updated>2011-06-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Placing PTO spending on mandatory auto-pilot as outlined in HR 1249 would also hand the Congressional &#8220;power of the purse&#8221; &#8212; bestowed in the Constitution &#8212; to the Obama White House, and essentially eliminate the ability of Congress to perform ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2011/06/09/patent-reform-act-placed-in-jeopardy-over-control-of-money/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Patent Reform Bill Making Strange Bedfellows</title>
    <link href="http://townhall.com/columnists/sandyrios/2011/06/09/the_patent_reform_bill_making_strange_bedfellows" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-09:/commentary/10984201</id>
    <updated>2011-06-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Town Hall</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Every member of Congress should be concerned that passage of HR 1249 will allow large global corporations like GE and Microsoft (major backers of 1249) to dominate the US patent process as never before, freezing out thousands of small inventors from a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://townhall.com/columnists/sandyrios/2011/06/09/the_patent_reform_bill_making_strange_bedfellows&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House committee issues its report on the America Invents Act; Obama ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e68c0a88-8e16-4121-9caa-4965023db5c2" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-09:/commentary/10983994</id>
    <updated>2011-06-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On June 1, 2011, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX) submitted the committee&amp;#39;s report on HR 1249, the America Invents Act, to the full House. The committee recently voted 32 to 3 in favor of sending the ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e68c0a88-8e16-4121-9caa-4965023db5c2&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Supreme Court Signals Pending Patent Reform Is Unconstitutional</title>
    <link href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-b-ravicher/supreme-court-signals-pen_b_873445.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-09:/commentary/10983993</id>
    <updated>2011-06-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Huffington Post (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Congress is, unfortunately, on the verge of passing the so-called &amp;quot;America Invents Act&amp;quot; (S. 23 and HR 1249) that would change our patent system from the &amp;quot;first to invent&amp;quot; system we&amp;#39;ve had since our founding, to a &amp;quot;first to fil&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-b-ravicher/supreme-court-signals-pen_b_873445.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The anti-innovation patent reform act of 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202496735692&amp;amp;The_antiinnovation_patent_reform_act_of_" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-09:/commentary/10983992</id>
    <updated>2011-06-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Law Journal</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 A patent reform bill is currently pending in Congress (Senate S. 23 and its House counterpart HR 1249) titled the &amp;quot;America Invents Act.&amp;quot; The bill proposes radical changes to the existing patent system that would impede innovation. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202496735692&amp;amp;The_antiinnovation_patent_reform_act_of_&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>America Invents Act: Quo Vadis?</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/america-invents-act-quo-vadis.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-09:/commentary/10981852</id>
    <updated>2011-06-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 As noted in an earlier Patent Docs post, Representatives Harold Rogers (R-KY) and Paul Ryan (R-WI) object to provisions of the House &amp;quot;patent reform&amp;quot; bill (HR 1249) by citing Constitutional concerns (transferring appropriation authority from Cong&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/america-invents-act-quo-vadis.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Analysis of H.R. 1249, the &#8220;America Invents Act,&#8221; Uncovers New Problems</title>
    <link href="http://www.bradenton.com/2011/06/08/3258630/analysis-of-hr-1249-the-america.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-08:/commentary/11013356</id>
    <updated>2011-06-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bradenton Herald</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Smith calling HR 1249 into question. According to that letter, the bill will &#8220;hand the Congressional &amp;#39;power of the purse&amp;#39; &#8211; bestowed in the Constitution &#8211; to the Obama White House, and essentially eliminate the ability of Congress to perform&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradenton.com/2011/06/08/3258630/analysis-of-hr-1249-the-america.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Techcomm</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ca40d652-8602-4e54-b9a2-cb4429607fee" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-08:/commentary/10981827</id>
    <updated>2011-06-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Goodlatte also predicted that the House version of the America Invents Act (HR 1249) will pass the House with &#8220;wide support&#8221; later this month. Goodlatte, speaking on behalf of Representative Greg Walden (R-OR), who could not attend, said that spectrum&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ca40d652-8602-4e54-b9a2-cb4429607fee&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congressman Paul Ryan</title>
    <link href="http://ipwatchdog.com/tag/h-r-1249/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-08:/commentary/10981826</id>
    <updated>2011-06-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPWatchdog.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 In a letter sent to Congressman Lamar Smith (R-TX), two key Republican Chairmen are opposing the USPTO funding mechanisms currently in place in HR 1249, which mirror those passed by the Senate earlier this year. Congressman Paul Ryan (R-WI), ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipwatchdog.com/tag/h-r-1249/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Analysis of H.R. 1249, the &#8220;America Invents Act,&#8221; Uncovers New Problems</title>
    <link href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110608006335/en/Analysis-H.R.-1249-%E2%80%9CAmerica-Invents-Act%E2%80%9D-Uncovers" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-08:/commentary/10981825</id>
    <updated>2011-06-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Business Wire (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Smith calling HR 1249 into question. According to that letter, the bill will &#8220;hand the Congressional &amp;#39;power of the purse&amp;#39; &#8211; bestowed in the Constitution &#8211; to the Obama White House, and essentially eliminate the ability of Congress to perform&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110608006335/en/Analysis-H.R.-1249-%E2%80%9CAmerica-Invents-Act%E2%80%9D-Uncovers&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform News Briefs</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/patent-reform-news-briefs.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-08:/commentary/10979864</id>
    <updated>2011-06-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On June 1, the House Committee on the Judiciary issued its report on HR 1249, the America Invents Act. The 165-page report indicates that following consideration of the bill, the Committee now &amp;quot;reports favorably thereon with an ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/patent-reform-news-briefs.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform - America Invents Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=2433f0cb-b874-4442-b5db-8d6fac201a41" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-07:/commentary/10976881</id>
    <updated>2011-06-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The America Invents Act was introduced to the House of Representatives on March 30, 2011. HR 1249 was subsequently approved by the House Judiciary Committee on April 14, 2011, with slight amendments. Notable substantive differences between S.23 and HR ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=2433f0cb-b874-4442-b5db-8d6fac201a41&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rogers, Ryan team up to object to patent bill</title>
    <link href="http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/appropriations/165089-rogers-ryan-team-up-to-object-to-patent-bill" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-07:/commentary/10976880</id>
    <updated>2011-06-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Hill (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The move complicates efforts to bringing to the House floor The America Invents Act (HR 1249), which for the first time transforms the US patent system from a first-to-invent to a first-to-file system. The bill aims to streamline the current lengthy ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/appropriations/165089-rogers-ryan-team-up-to-object-to-patent-bill&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Supreme Court Upholds &#8220;First-to-Invent&#8221; Standard in U.S. Patent Law</title>
    <link href="http://eon.businesswire.com/news/eon/20110606006656/en/patent-reform/H.R.-1249/America-Invents-Act" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-06:/commentary/11006893</id>
    <updated>2011-06-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>EON: Enhanced Online News (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Roche dramatically exposes the brazen misrepresentations by the proponents of the first-to-file provision in HR 1249&#8221; Earlier today, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 for the respondents in Stanford v. Roche, a patent infringement case on appeal from the US .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://eon.businesswire.com/news/eon/20110606006656/en/patent-reform/H.R.-1249/America-Invents-Act&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Supreme Court Upholds &#8220;First-to-Invent&#8221; Standard in US Patent Law</title>
    <link href="http://gamutnews.com/20110606/16610/supreme-court-upholds-first-to-invent-standard-in-u-s-patent-law.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-06:/commentary/11006581</id>
    <updated>2011-06-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Gamut News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 It is time for the House to withdraw HR 1249, a clear attempt to deviate from the Constitutional system, and focus instead on the real issue facing our patent system: the inexcusable three-year delay in processing applications at the patent office, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gamutnews.com/20110606/16610/supreme-court-upholds-first-to-invent-standard-in-u-s-patent-law.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Supreme Court Upholds &#8220;First-to-Invent&#8221; Standard in U.S. Patent Law</title>
    <link href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110606006646/en/Supreme-Court-Upholds-%E2%80%9CFirst-to-Invent%E2%80%9D-Standard-U.S.-Patent" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-06:/commentary/10972047</id>
    <updated>2011-06-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Business Wire (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 It is time for the House to withdraw HR 1249, a clear attempt to deviate from the Constitutional system, and focus instead on the real issue facing our patent system: the inexcusable three-year delay in processing applications at the patent office, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110606006646/en/Supreme-Court-Upholds-%E2%80%9CFirst-to-Invent%E2%80%9D-Standard-U.S.-Patent&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Not Necessarily Patent &amp;quot;Reform&amp;quot;</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/not-necessarily-patent-reform.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-02:/commentary/10967865</id>
    <updated>2011-06-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The seeming legislative juggernaut that is the America Invents Act (S. 23 and HR 1249) is reportedly going to come to a floor vote in the House of Representatives this month. If it passes, there is a real chance that the bill will ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/06/not-necessarily-patent-reform.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Commerce Secretary Provides Administration&amp;#39;s Views on America Invents Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/05/commerce-secretary-provides-administrations-views-on-america-invents-act.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-01:/commentary/10959473</id>
    <updated>2011-06-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 With regard to the grace period provided by the House bill -- which has been a topic of debate in patent circles since the bill was reported out of Committee -- Secretary Locke contended that HR 1249 &amp;quot;provides a more transparent and certain grace ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/05/commerce-secretary-provides-administrations-views-on-america-invents-act.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>MANZULLO: Patent reform proposals threaten American prosperity</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/may/26/patent-reform-proposals-threaten-american-prosperi/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-27:/commentary/10929294</id>
    <updated>2011-05-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Washington Times</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 I am deeply concerned that the America Invents Act (HR 1249), which was introduced earlier this year, will stall American innovation and send more of our jobs overseas. This legislation reflects an approach to patent reform that stalled previously, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/may/26/patent-reform-proposals-threaten-american-prosperi/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CPAs Visit Capitol Hill to Talk Taxes</title>
    <link href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110524006899/en/CPAs-Visit-Capitol-Hill-Talk-Taxes" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-26:/commentary/10929295</id>
    <updated>2011-05-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Business Wire (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 A similar bill, HR 1249, cleared the House Judiciary Committee on April 14 by 32 to 3 and is awaiting action by the US House of Representatives. CPAs will discuss with their elected representatives the need to establish a national standard for ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110524006899/en/CPAs-Visit-Capitol-Hill-Talk-Taxes&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Current Patent Bill Helps Global Elite, Not the Little &amp;quot;Guy&amp;quot;</title>
    <link href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-dana-rohrabacher/current-patent-bill-helps_b_867105.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-25:/commentary/10929293</id>
    <updated>2011-05-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Huffington Post (blog)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 While Senator Coons is 100% correct about the importance of innovation to our economy, and about the foolishness of continuing to allow this backlog of patents to cripple American job creation, he is 100% wrong about HR 1249, the America Invents Act. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-dana-rohrabacher/current-patent-bill-helps_b_867105.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CPAs Visit Capitol Hill to Talk Taxes</title>
    <link href="http://gamutnews.com/20110524/7894/cpas-visit-capitol-hill-to-talk-taxes.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-24:/commentary/10905590</id>
    <updated>2011-05-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Gamut News (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 A similar bill, HR 1249, cleared the House Judiciary Committee on April 14 by 32 to 3 and is awaiting action by the US House of Representatives. CPAs will discuss with their elected representatives the need to establish a national standard for ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gamutnews.com/20110524/7894/cpas-visit-capitol-hill-to-talk-taxes.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Funding cuts stall USPTO backlog initiatives</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bb876f86-e709-4f55-9c6d-fa49ea5e1856" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-23:/commentary/10905596</id>
    <updated>2011-05-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House Judiciary Committee voted in favor of the House bill (HR 1249) on April 14, 2011, and it may be up for a full vote when Congress returns in May. If this legislation becomes law, the USPTO will be in a better position to meet its strategic ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bb876f86-e709-4f55-9c6d-fa49ea5e1856&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Funding Cuts Stall USPTO Backlog Initiatives</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=132710" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-18:/commentary/10905597</id>
    <updated>2011-05-18T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq News Alerts (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House Judiciary Committee voted in favor of the House bill (HR 1249) on April 14, 2011, and it may be up for a full vote when Congress returns in May. If this legislation becomes law, the USPTO will be in a better position to meet its strategic ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=132710&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Paul Devinsky, Partner, McDermott Will &amp;amp; Emery LLP to Speak at KC&amp;#39;s 2011 ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.pr.com/press-release/324632" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-18:/commentary/10905594</id>
    <updated>2011-05-18T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PR.com (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Recently, the US Senate and House of Representatives passed similar versions of the Patent Reform Act of 2011 (S. 23 and HR 1249, respectively). These bills, also known as The America Invents Act, include many significant changes such as the move from ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pr.com/press-release/324632&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DC &#8211; &#8220;We Want It Both Ways&#8221;</title>
    <link href="http://wallstreetpit.com/75468-dc-we-want-it-both-ways" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-18:/commentary/10905592</id>
    <updated>2011-05-18T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Wall Street Pit</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 They are pushing for passage of a new law, HR 1249, S.23. So what is the intent of the new law? It would prohibit patents on strategies to avoid, reduce or defer federal, state, local or other taxes. The word &#8220;ludicrous&#8221; comes to mind. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wallstreetpit.com/75468-dc-we-want-it-both-ways&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Heard of the America Invents Act?</title>
    <link href="http://oregoncatalyst.com/america-invents-act-of-2011" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-16:/commentary/10947401</id>
    <updated>2011-05-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Oregon Catalyst</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On April 14, 2011, the House Judiciary Committee approved HR 1249, the &#8220;America Invents Act,&#8221; by a vote of 32-3. The Bill has already passed in the Senate and is expected to be considered by the entire House either later this month or in June. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://oregoncatalyst.com/america-invents-act-of-2011&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Act Is Dangerous to US Security</title>
    <link href="http://townhall.com/columnists/phyllisschlafly/2011/05/17/patent_act_is_dangerous_to_us_security" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-16:/commentary/10905589</id>
    <updated>2011-05-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Town Hall</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 More and more dangerous effects of the proposed changes to US patent law (S. 23, HR 1249) keep emerging, especially since the hearings failed to hear from any real inventors. The proposed bill is unconstitutional, an attack on our national security and ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://townhall.com/columnists/phyllisschlafly/2011/05/17/patent_act_is_dangerous_to_us_security&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ronen Arad, Director, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to Speak at KC&amp;#39;s 2011 Patent ...</title>
    <link href="http://pr-usa.net/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=729065&amp;amp;Itemid=30" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-14:/commentary/10905593</id>
    <updated>2011-05-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PR-USA.net (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Recently, the US Senate and House of Representatives passed similar versions of the Patent Reform Act of 2011 (S. 23 and HR 1249, respectively). These bills, also known as The America Invents Act, include many significant changes such as the move from ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://pr-usa.net/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=729065&amp;amp;Itemid=30&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The House enters the patent reform fray</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=1f0963b1-b049-43e6-9e9a-ccb697cb195c" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-06:/commentary/10905595</id>
    <updated>2011-05-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The US House of Representatives March 30 began discussion on a patent reform bill, HR 1249, introduced earlier that day. The House bill (known as the America Invents Act) aligned with a Senate bill (S. 23) in a ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=1f0963b1-b049-43e6-9e9a-ccb697cb195c&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Shortchanging Our Inventors Is Slowing Our Economic Recovery</title>
    <link href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-coons/shortchanging-inventors-i_b_857990.html?ir=Politics" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-05:/commentary/10905591</id>
    <updated>2011-05-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Huffington Post</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Now America is waiting for the House to pass its own version of the measure, HR 1249, which cleared the House Judiciary Committee last month. Congress&amp;#39; delay in ending patent-fee diversion is costing America jobs at a time when we desperately need to &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-coons/shortchanging-inventors-i_b_857990.html?ir=Politics&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Protective Orders Put at Risk by New Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/05/protective-orders-put-at-risk-by-new-bill.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-04:/commentary/10852830</id>
    <updated>2011-05-04T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Lost in all the hubbub over the America Invents Act (S. 23 and HR 1249, collectively &amp;quot;the patent reform bill&amp;quot;), Congress is considering another pair of bills (one in each House) that could have an equally deleterious effect on ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/05/protective-orders-put-at-risk-by-new-bill.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent law reform 2011</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=789f9b23-c13a-49d7-aa52-c2cf2c525b7b" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-03:/commentary/10852831</id>
    <updated>2011-05-03T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Congressman Lamar Smith introduced HR 1249 &#8220;America Invents Act&#8221; on March 30, 2010, to the House of Representatives, which has also held extensive hearings on patent law reform. The House Judiciary Committee approved the legislation with amendments on&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=789f9b23-c13a-49d7-aa52-c2cf2c525b7b&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform progresses in the 112th Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=33e683c2-f4f5-4399-8b7c-f88160e548f7" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-03:/commentary/10849884</id>
    <updated>2011-05-03T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Last Thursday, April 14, the House Judiciary Committee worked through mark ups to its version of the &#8220;America Invents Act,&#8221; which was introduced in the House on March 30 as HR 1249. The Manager&amp;#39;s Amendment circulated by House Judiciary Chairman La&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=33e683c2-f4f5-4399-8b7c-f88160e548f7&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Letter: Federal patent bill is bad news for small businesses</title>
    <link href="http://myedmondsnews.com/2011/04/letter-federal-patent-bill-is-bad-news-for-small-businesses/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-28:/commentary/10806616</id>
    <updated>2011-04-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>My Edmonds News (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 For years the small business community has repeatedly warned the Congress that provisions in various Federal patent bills, like current House Bill HR 1249, the &#8220;America Invents Act,&#8221; will hurt small American businesses that depend on patent protection&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://myedmondsnews.com/2011/04/letter-federal-patent-bill-is-bad-news-for-small-businesses/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Education</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=02519cd5-20f0-4a86-8b0e-606b0bae2709" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-26:/commentary/10806619</id>
    <updated>2011-04-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On April 14, the House Judiciary Committee approved its patent reform bill (HR 1249) by a 32-3 vote, which will shift the US patent system to a &#8220;first inventor to file&#8221; standard. The panel accepted an amendment by Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX) which ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=02519cd5-20f0-4a86-8b0e-606b0bae2709&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House judiciary passes America Invents Act</title>
    <link href="http://sandiegonewsroom.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=43477:house-judiciary-passes-america-invents-act-&amp;amp;catid=53:judiciary&amp;amp;Itemid=38" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-26:/commentary/10806615</id>
    <updated>2011-04-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>San Diego News Room</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House Judiciary Committee approved HR 1249 on April 14 by a vote of 32-3, and the bill is expected to reach the House floor in May or June. Like S. 23, the America Invents Act of 2011 which passed the Senate in March, this bill switches the United ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sandiegonewsroom.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=43477:house-judiciary-passes-america-invents-act-&amp;amp;catid=53:judiciary&amp;amp;Itemid=38&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Patent Bill is Unconstitutional</title>
    <link href="http://townhall.com/columnists/phyllisschlafly/2011/04/26/the_patent_bill_is_unconstitutional" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-25:/commentary/10806618</id>
    <updated>2011-04-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Town Hall</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 It&amp;#39;s now being pushed without any publicity in the House as HR 1249. But harmonization makes no sense. Why would we abandon the proven best system that has worked successfully for more than two centuries and replace it with a proven inferior system? .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://townhall.com/columnists/phyllisschlafly/2011/04/26/the_patent_bill_is_unconstitutional&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform On The Move</title>
    <link href="http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/89/i17/8917notw9.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-24:/commentary/10806617</id>
    <updated>2011-04-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical &amp;amp; Engineering News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The bill, HR 1249, was approved by a vote of 32-3 and would align the US with other industrialized nations that use a &#8220;first to file&#8221; system, which awards patents to the inventor who filed an application first, rather than allowing a fight over who ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/89/i17/8917notw9.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Bill With First-to-File Standard Passes Committee</title>
    <link href="http://fdanews.com/newsletter/article?issueId=14658&amp;amp;articleId=136069" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-19:/commentary/10805243</id>
    <updated>2011-04-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>FDA news (subscription)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House Judiciary Committee has approved the America Invents Act (HR 1249), a bill that implements a first-to-file standard for patent approval that was favored by devicemakers. The bill passed the committee by a vote of 32&#8211;3 Thursday. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://fdanews.com/newsletter/article?issueId=14658&amp;amp;articleId=136069&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BIO opposes House Judiciary Committee&amp;#39;s patent reform bill.</title>
    <link href="http://news.thomasnet.com/companystory/BIO-opposes-House-Judiciary-Committee-s-patent-reform-bill-595028" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-19:/commentary/10788691</id>
    <updated>2011-04-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ThomasNet Industrial News Room</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 April 20, 2011 - BIO President and CEO Jim Greenwood released statement regarding the America Invents Act, HR 1249, which passed House Committee on the Judiciary. According to Greenwood, BIO has consistently praised House Judiciary Committee Chairman ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.thomasnet.com/companystory/BIO-opposes-House-Judiciary-Committee-s-patent-reform-bill-595028&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform progresses in the 112th Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=279e3c64-a9f6-489d-af06-dc34f6bee668" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-18:/commentary/10786748</id>
    <updated>2011-04-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On March 30, HR 1249 was introduced in the House as the &amp;quot;America Invents Act.&amp;quot; Earlier in March the US Senate passed S. 23, its version of patent reform, by a vote of 95-5. Patent reform continues to be a major priority for public and private se&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=279e3c64-a9f6-489d-af06-dc34f6bee668&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>USPTO Issues Final Rules To Implement PrioritizedExamination Track (Track I)</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=129768" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-17:/commentary/10777912</id>
    <updated>2011-04-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq News Alerts (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 However, the patent reform legislation passed by the Senate (S.23) and pending in the House (HR 1249) contains such authority. Thus, a reduced filing fee could be made available to small entities in the future. Once granted prioritized status, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=129768&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AIPLA Applauds Approval of Patent Reform in House Committee</title>
    <link href="http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/04/15/aipla-applauds-approval-of-patent-reform-in-house-committee/id=16486/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-14:/commentary/10762657</id>
    <updated>2011-04-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPWatchdog.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 ... The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) commends House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Tex) for shepherding patent reform legislation another step closer to enactment with the Committee&amp;#39;s strong approval of HR 1249. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/04/15/aipla-applauds-approval-of-patent-reform-in-house-committee/id=16486/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.ctlawtribune.com/getarticle.aspx?ID=40219" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-14:/commentary/10762656</id>
    <updated>2011-04-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Connecticut Law Tribune</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The House of Representatives recently introduced a first version of its own patent law reform act, HR 1249. &#8226; Alter how the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is funded. Presently, the US is the last of the major developed nations to have a ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ctlawtribune.com/getarticle.aspx?ID=40219&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reaction to Manager&amp;#39;s Amendment to House Patent Reform Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/04/reaction-to-managers-amendment-to-house-patent-reform-bill.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-13:/commentary/10792052</id>
    <updated>2011-04-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On Tuesday, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX) offered a Manager&amp;#39;s Amendment to HR 1249, the House version of the America Invents Act (see &amp;quot;House Judiciary Chairman Releases Manager&amp;#39;s Amendment to HR 1249&amp;quot;). ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2011/04/reaction-to-managers-amendment-to-house-patent-reform-bill.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=183cebf1-c426-4b53-8b87-f44e834d458a" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-13:/commentary/10806620</id>
    <updated>2011-04-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 HR 1249) on March 30, 2011. The House bill is very similar to the Senate bill, but includes some notable differences. The first-inventor-to-file system and limitation of the one year grace period is the same in the passed Senate bill and recently ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=183cebf1-c426-4b53-8b87-f44e834d458a&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>This week in Washington</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=17c33e20-ed59-4776-b2e7-919055dca11e" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-11:/commentary/10758736</id>
    <updated>2011-04-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On Wednesday, House Judiciary Chair Lamar Smith (R-Texas) introduced the America Invents Act (HR 1249), the House companion measure to the Senate comprehensive patent reform bill (S. 23) passed by the Senate earlier this month. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=17c33e20-ed59-4776-b2e7-919055dca11e&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=30a6d040-746f-4484-892a-257c0319431b" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-11:/commentary/10758733</id>
    <updated>2011-04-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>JD Supra (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 HR 1249) on March 30, 2011. The House bill is very similar to the Senate bill, but includes some notable differences. The first-inventor-to-file system and limitation of the one year grace period is the same in the passed Senate bill and recently ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=30a6d040-746f-4484-892a-257c0319431b&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A patent failure</title>
    <link href="http://dailycaller.com/2011/04/12/a-patent-failure/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-11:/commentary/10758732</id>
    <updated>2011-04-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Caller</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Now HR 1249, with the encouragement of companies like Intel, GE, Dell and others, has been introduced by Congressman Lamar Alexander and could be called for a vote at any time. But the voices of America&amp;#39;s inventors are crying to be heard! ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dailycaller.com/2011/04/12/a-patent-failure/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>USPTO issues final rules to implement prioritized examination track (Track I)</title>
    <link href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=cbb3dae3-25b8-4543-a2ed-0f6820d05537" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-10:/commentary/10758737</id>
    <updated>2011-04-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lexology (registration)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 However, the patent reform legislation passed by the Senate (S.23) and pending in the House (HR 1249) contains such authority. Thus, a reduced filing fee could be made available to small entities in the future. Once granted prioritized status, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=cbb3dae3-25b8-4543-a2ed-0f6820d05537&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://www.genengnews.com/analysis-and-insight/house-takes-different-stance-from-senate-on-two-key-factors-in-patent-reform/77899391/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-09:/commentary/10758728</id>
    <updated>2011-04-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Genetic Engineering News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Like the Senate version (S.23), the House measure (HR 1249) would shift the basis on which the US issues patents, from first-to-invent to first-to-file. The House bill would also allow the USPTO to keep the fee revenues it generates from filers, ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.genengnews.com/analysis-and-insight/house-takes-different-stance-from-senate-on-two-key-factors-in-patent-reform/77899391/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Proposed U.S. Patent Reform Legislation Undermines American Competitiveness ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.americanbankingnews.com/2011/04/06/proposed-u-s-patent-reform-legislation-undermines-american-competitiveness-coalition-of-nine-inventor-organizations-says-in-letter-to-congress/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-05:/commentary/10783504</id>
    <updated>2011-04-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>American Banking News (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &#8220;S.23 [the Senate version of HR 1249] proposes the US switch to an obtuse &amp;#39;First-Inventor-To-File&amp;#39; concept which is &amp;#39;First-to-File&amp;#39; muddled with an immensely complex set of priority rules unlike any patent priority system ever used befor&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanbankingnews.com/2011/04/06/proposed-u-s-patent-reform-legislation-undermines-american-competitiveness-coalition-of-nine-inventor-organizations-says-in-letter-to-congress/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Proposed U.S. Patent Reform Legislation Undermines American Competitiveness ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110406005609/en/Proposed-U.S.-Patent-Reform-Legislation-Undermines-American" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-05:/commentary/10777946</id>
    <updated>2011-04-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Business Wire (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &#8220;S.23 [the Senate version of HR 1249] proposes the US switch to an obtuse &amp;#39;First-Inventor-To-File&amp;#39; concept which is &amp;#39;First-to-File&amp;#39; muddled with an immensely complex set of priority rules unlike any patent priority system ever used befor&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110406005609/en/Proposed-U.S.-Patent-Reform-Legislation-Undermines-American&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Proposed US Patent Reform Legislation Undermines American Competitiveness ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.mromagazine.com/press-releases/story.aspx?id=4615794" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-05:/commentary/10777913</id>
    <updated>2011-04-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>MRO (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &#191;S.23 [the Senate version of HR 1249] proposes the US switch to an obtuse `First-Inventor-To-File&#191; concept which is `First-to-File&#191; muddled with an immensely complex set of priority rules unlike any patent priority system ever used before in any ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mromagazine.com/press-releases/story.aspx?id=4615794&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BIO Emphasises On The Role Of Patent Reform Legislation In Creating Biotech Jobs</title>
    <link href="http://www.pharmaceutical-jobs.com/pharmaceutical-news/bio-emphasises-on-the-role-of-patent-reform-legislation-in-creating-biotech-jobs" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-05:/commentary/10758731</id>
    <updated>2011-04-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pharmaceutical Jobs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) has applauded the introduction of the America Invents Act, HR 1249, in the US House of Representatives. The organisation has praised House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX) for his introduction of ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pharmaceutical-jobs.com/pharmaceutical-news/bio-emphasises-on-the-role-of-patent-reform-legislation-in-creating-biotech-jobs&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Proposed U.S. Patent Reform Legislation Undermines American Competitiveness ...</title>
    <link href="http://eon.businesswire.com/news/eon/20110406005611/en/S.23/H.R.1249/patent-reform" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-05:/commentary/10758729</id>
    <updated>2011-04-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>EON: Enhanced Online News (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 &#8220;S.23 [the Senate version of HR 1249] proposes the US switch to an obtuse &amp;#39;First-Inventor-To-File&amp;#39; concept which is &amp;#39;First-to-File&amp;#39; muddled with an immensely complex set of priority rules unlike any patent priority system ever used befor&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://eon.businesswire.com/news/eon/20110406005611/en/S.23/H.R.1249/patent-reform&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Online piracy is bipartisan domain</title>
    <link href="http://www.congress.org/news/2011/04/05/online_piracy_is_bipartisan_domain" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-04:/commentary/10758735</id>
    <updated>2011-04-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Congress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 ... video rental shop, contending that online streaming of the films infringes on copyright protections. This is not the first time Leahy and Smith have teamed up. They have been working closely on legislation (S 23, HR 1249) to overhaul patent laws. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.congress.org/news/2011/04/05/online_piracy_is_bipartisan_domain&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Wave of Dismissals in Wake of Federal Circuit Ruling Governing Patent Marking ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.law.com/jsp/tx/PubArticleTX.jsp?id=1202489012737" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-03:/commentary/10758734</id>
    <updated>2011-04-03T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Texas Lawyer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The act to amend Title 35, United States Code, to provide for patent reform, HR 1249, would only allow the United States, not whistleblowers, to file such cases. It would also change the damages and allow damage awards to competitors harmed by false ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.com/jsp/tx/PubArticleTX.jsp?id=1202489012737&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BIO commends launch of US House patent reform process, but with reservations</title>
    <link href="http://www.thepharmaletter.com/file/103313/bio-commends-launch-of-us-house-patent-reform-process-but-with-reservations.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-04-03:/commentary/10758730</id>
    <updated>2011-04-03T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Pharma Letter</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Commenting on the introduction of the America Invents Act, HR 1249, in the US House of Representatives, USA-based Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) president and chief executive Jim Greenwood said: &#8220;BIO praises House Judiciary Committee ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepharmaletter.com/file/103313/bio-commends-launch-of-us-house-patent-reform-process-but-with-reservations.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform 2011: House of Representatives Bill No. HR 1249</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/03/patent-reform-2011-house-of-representatives-bill-no-hr-1249.html?cid=6a00d8341c588553ef014e604fc3b8970c" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-03-31:/commentary/10704147</id>
    <updated>2011-03-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patently-O</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 HR 1249. [AIA.pdf] The AIA closely tracks the Senate&amp;#39;s bill on comprehensive patent reform (S. 23) that was passed in the Senate earlier this year on a 95-5 vote. Parallel changes include a switch to a first-to-file system (with the retention of a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/03/patent-reform-2011-house-of-representatives-bill-no-hr-1249.html?cid=6a00d8341c588553ef014e604fc3b8970c&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BIO Commends Launch of House Patent Reform Process</title>
    <link href="http://www.americanbankingnews.com/2011/03/31/bio-commends-launch-of-house-patent-reform-process/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-03-30:/commentary/10704148</id>
    <updated>2011-03-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>American Banking News (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 31, 2011 (Business Wire) &#8212; Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) President and CEO Jim Greenwood released the following statement on the introduction of the America Invents Act, HR 1249, in the US House of Representatives: &#8220;BIO praises House ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanbankingnews.com/2011/03/31/bio-commends-launch-of-house-patent-reform-process/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

