H.R.2 - Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act

To repeal the job-killing health care law and health care-related provisions in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. view all titles (3)

All Bill Titles

  • Official: To repeal the job-killing health care law and health care-related provisions in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. as introduced.
  • Short: Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act as introduced.
  • Short: Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act as passed house.

This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.

Comments Feed

Displaying 31-60 of 71 total comments.

Spam Comment

Spam Comment

DanKat 01/17/2011 8:18am
in reply to faheem2774 Jan 13, 2011 3:27pm

There is so much garbage intertwined in this mess of a bill, it would be incredibly difficult and time consuming to go through it. Make a clean break and start over. Also all the other non-health care provisions that were sneaked into this bill (like always) will be taken away as well.
I bet if you really knew everything that is in this bill, you would think twice about keeping it.

Spam Comment

Spam Comment

Spam Comment

kir 01/17/2011 2:12am
in reply to thejock13 Jan 15, 2011 10:14am

Makes it more affordable? Health insurance and health care costs already have risen because of this bill. Just ask the employees of AARP who lost their health insurance coverage because AARP could no longer afford to pay for it with the increased cost. Think about it “medical device” manufacturers now have to pay a new tax on all devices. How does that cut costs? As for leeching off the rest of us, my family loses a LOT of money to taxes each year. Why don’t the rest of YOU stop leeching off of US?

suzieqs 04/12/2011 7:01am
in reply to kir Jan 17, 2011 2:12am

But it’s ok for the Health Insurance Companies to “leech” off of the consumer, & it’s ok for the Big Oil companies to “leech” off the land and it’s ok for Big Corporations to “leech” off of the taxpayer in tax loopholes & government subsidies.

My earnings have remained stagnant for 12 years now, even a .50 cent an hour increase doesn’t anywhere near make up for the increased cost for heat & utilities, or the cost for gas at the pump. Never mind that food prices have risen sharply as well.

Spam Comment

jdubya1977 02/02/2011 3:20pm
in reply to kir Jan 09, 2011 5:42am

And I cannot afford to pay more in my health insurance premiums to cover your in ability to pay for health insurance. If you do not want to buy health insurance and cannot pay cash for the services rendered at your local hospital or doctors office then don’t go when you are sick, in a car accident, or fall and break your arm. A big part of the problem is people like you. Stop smoking a carton of cigarettes a week and you may be able to afford health insurance….

fakk2 02/15/2011 10:24pm
in reply to Snexas Jan 31, 2011 10:28am

Ok, I have to mention something that hasn’t been said here.

I currently have insurance, but when the individual mandate goes into effect, I plan on dropping my coverage until I need it because it’s cheaper just to break the law as far as this goes. I know I’m not the only one willing to do that. So, if insurance companies fail because of people like me, doesn’t that just leave us with the government or “public” option. And if so, wouldn’t this create more government spending?

Snexas 01/31/2011 10:28am
in reply to DanKat Jan 24, 2011 9:19am

And where is the personal responsibility in not buying health insurance, waiting until your sick to use emergency room care, and then forcing tax payers to foot the bill and causing insurance rates to skyrocket? The original health care law helps level the playing field. It seems like the government should only really help the neediest people who can’t afford health care, not those irresponsible people who choose not to have health insurance because they think nothing will ever happen to them and then they go bankrupt from health bills because they can’t get insurance after they’re already sick.

apollobartender 01/20/2011 9:12am

B58 – it is not a government run healthcare, which is the purpose for all of this theatre. If the constituents truly understood that the Affordable Healthcare Act takes government money to help Americans purchase private healthcare, we wouldn’t have to go through this whole dance on the Congress floor, believe me, the Healthcare industry has no intention of letting this Act get repealed. Its the best deal they could hope for actually, this was a republican idea in the first place. What the Healthcare industry really wants is to get the republicans to dismantle all of the consumer protections that are in the bill so they can sell more junk insurance policies. – which is really what this fight is about. The real issues haven’t surfaced yet. Stay tuned

grant3719 02/02/2011 9:49am

Obamacare has to be repealed. It dose nothing about the cost of health care! Health Insurance is from the Insurance industry. Health Care is from the Health Care industry. Two differant Industries. The cost of health care is what I pay when I go to the doc. or hospital. Insurance is money I would be giving away.

badams82 01/16/2011 3:46pm

Waste of time. Nothing but a front to appease those who voted for them. It will most likely not pass. Precious time wasted. Time, that could be utilized to deal with other pertinent issues that will actually help our economy.

vm7488 09/27/2011 1:22pm

It just shows how real antagonistic the Republicans are. Eric Cantor doesn’t have a job to serve the American People, his job is to be a Thorn on Obama’s Administration. That’s the one, true, absolute purpose in his life. In fact, if Obama finally suffers, I bet he can die a happy man.

kwittlieff 01/14/2011 5:32am
in reply to suzieqs Jan 08, 2011 11:57am

And the Democrats only have our best interest in mind right?

Spam Comment

suzieqs 04/12/2011 6:52am
in reply to apollobartender Jan 20, 2011 9:09am

Conservatives attack ideas? So if they repeal the LIHEAP program that means they’re only attacking an ideal, not a collection of society, it’s just our imagination that Low Income Families & Seniors will be harmed if this happens, and it’s just our imagination that those people with pre-existing conditions will be harmed if this were to truly be enacted.

Yea, conservatives don’t attack people, you’re right. It’s just our imagination.

Spam Comment

grant3719 02/02/2011 9:20am
in reply to kir Jan 15, 2011 2:57am

kir, From reading your post I bet you and your family are like mine, We PAY for OUR own health Care. We just don’t have Health insurance. I don’t want health insurance and I don’t need any help paying for the services I contract. If I can’t afford to get an annual check-up I DON"T. I get the health services I can afford and that’s enough.

navigation74 03/22/2011 8:19am
in reply to mmstahlecker Feb 03, 2011 6:56am

You mean kind of like the logic that leads Republicans to claim “less government” but really just want to control aspects of our lives?

Drug laws
anti-abortion laws
anti-sodomy laws
anti-gay marriage laws

Sounds like a lot of government intervention to me.

Spam Comment

Nicklar 01/28/2011 10:35am
in reply to suzieqs Jan 25, 2011 7:55pm

Actually, it is common practice to in some way connect a politician’s name to legislation when that politician was instrumental in its passage. It is more often done in a way such as the McCain/Feingold Act.

As to the term “Obamacare” being an attack, the only way that someone in the Democratic party could truly view this as an attack would be if they had a negative view of the bill itself. If they are as fond of it as they claim to be, they should instead be jealous that it is not THEIR name on it!

hardhatgal 02/12/2011 7:07am
in reply to hardhatgal Feb 12, 2011 7:05am

here is a link that explains the healthc are bill…http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/22/your-money/health-insurance/22consumer.html?scp=1&sq=health%20care%20bill&st=Search

tom989 04/22/2011 9:51am
in reply to hardhatgal Feb 12, 2011 7:07am

Thanks for the link…lays it out well.

Snexas 01/31/2011 10:33am
in reply to fakk2 Jan 22, 2011 8:23am

What is your opinion on the Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen that President John Adams signed into law? It apparently garnished the wages of merchant sailors to pay for government built and run hospitals in order to help protect the economy of the day.

http://blogs.forbes.com/rickungar/2011/01/21/thomas-jefferson-also-supported-government-run-health-care/

DanKat 01/24/2011 9:19am
in reply to JeannieD Jan 22, 2011 5:46am

Government is not supposed to step in take over personal responsibilities. America became what it is by American’s hard work and personal responsibility. Compare that to where we are now. It is sickening to see our country changing from within so much.

What our federal government is doing now is similar to a person who lights a fire, which quickly becomes out of control and then this same person offers his advice and help to put it out, but does so badly.

Spam Comment

Spam Comment


Vote on This Bill

48% Users Support Bill

595 in favor / 634 opposed
 

Send Your Rep a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC
Save to Notebook Make A Bill Widget

Top-Rated Comments

OpenCongress is a free and open-source project of the Participatory Politics Foundation, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization with a mission to increase civic engagement. The non-profit Sunlight Foundation is the Founding and Primary Supporter of OpenCongress.