The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.R.2096 - Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2011
To advance cybersecurity research, development, and technical standards, and for other purposes.
| Version | Word Count | Changes From Previous Version | Percent Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced in House | 4,696 | n/a | n/a |
| Reported in House | 5,283 | 80 | 24% |
| Engrossed in House | 5,254 | 52 | 12% |
| Referred in Senate | 5,232 | 8 Show Changes Hide Changes | 5% |
Key: changed or removed text inserted or modified text

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HR 2096 EHRFSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

112th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

2d SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

H. R. 2096CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

May 7, 2012CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
May 7, 2012CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and TransportationCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

AN ACTCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

To advance cybersecurity research, development, and technical standards, and for other purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2012’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

TITLE I--RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE I--RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 101. DEFINITIONS.
In this title:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) NATIONAL COORDINATION OFFICE- The term National Coordination Office means the National Coordination Office for the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) PROGRAM- The term Program means the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development program which has been established under section 101 of the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 (

SEC. 102. FINDINGS.
Section 2 of the Cyber Security Research and Development Act (

(1) by amending paragraph (1) to read as follows:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

‘(1) Advancements in information and communications technology have resulted in a globally interconnected network of government, commercial, scientific, and education infrastructures, including critical infrastructures for electric power, natural gas and petroleum production and distribution, telecommunications, transportation, water supply, banking and finance, and emergency and government services.’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘Exponential increases in interconnectivity have facilitated enhanced communications, economic growth,’ and inserting ‘These advancements have significantly contributed to the growth of the United States economy’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(3) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

‘(3) The Cyberspace Policy Review published by the President in May, 2009, concluded that our information technology and communications infrastructure is vulnerable and has ‘suffered intrusions that have allowed criminals to steal hundreds of millions of dollars and nation-states and other entities to steal intellectual property and sensitive military information’.’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) by amending paragraph (6) to read as follows:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

‘(6) While African-Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans constitute 33 percent of the college-age population, members of these minorities comprise less than 20 percent of bachelor degree recipients in the field of computer sciences.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 103. CYBERSECURITY STRATEGIC RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
(a) In General- Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the agencies identified in subsection 101(a)(3)(B)(i) through (x) of the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 (

(b) Contents of Plan- The strategic plan required under subsection (a) shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) specify and prioritize near-term, mid-term and long-term research objectives, including objectives associated with the research areas identified in section 4(a)(1) of the Cyber Security Research and Development Act (

(2) describe how the Program will focus on innovative, transformational technologies with the potential to enhance the security, reliability, resilience, and trustworthiness of the digital infrastructure, and to protect consumer privacy;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(3) describe how the Program will foster the rapid transfer of research and development results into new cybersecurity technologies and applications for the timely benefit of society and the national interest, including through the dissemination of best practices and other outreach activities;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(4) describe how the Program will establish and maintain a national research infrastructure for creating, testing, and evaluating the next generation of secure networking and information technology systems;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(5) describe how the Program will facilitate access by academic researchers to the infrastructure described in paragraph (4), as well as to relevant data, including event data; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(6) describe how the Program will engage females and individuals identified in section 33 or 34 of the Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act (

(c) Development of Roadmap- The agencies described in subsection (a) shall develop and annually update an implementation roadmap for the strategic plan required in this section. Such roadmap shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) specify the role of each Federal agency in carrying out or sponsoring research and development to meet the research objectives of the strategic plan, including a description of how progress toward the research objectives will be evaluated;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) specify the funding allocated to each major research objective of the strategic plan and the source of funding by agency for the current fiscal year; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(3) estimate the funding required for each major research objective of the strategic plan for the following 3 fiscal years.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(d) Recommendations- In developing and updating the strategic plan under subsection (a), the agencies involved shall solicit recommendations and advice from--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) the advisory committee established under section 101(b)(1) of the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 (

(2) a wide range of stakeholders, including industry, academia, including representatives of minority serving institutions and community colleges, National Laboratories, and other relevant organizations and institutions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(e) Appending to Report- The implementation roadmap required under subsection (c), and its annual updates, shall be appended to the report required under section 101(a)(2)(D) of the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 (

SEC. 104. SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN CYBERSECURITY.
Section 4(a)(1) of the Cyber Security Research and Development Act (

(1) by inserting ‘and usability’ after ‘to the structure’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) in subparagraph (H), by striking ‘and’ after the semicolon;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(3) in subparagraph (I), by striking the period at the end and inserting ‘; and’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(4) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

‘(J) social and behavioral factors, including human-computer interactions, usability, and user motivations.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 105. NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION CYBERSECURITY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS.
(a) Computer and Network Security Research Areas- Section 4(a)(1) of the Cyber Security Research and Development Act (

(1) in subparagraph (A) by inserting ‘identity management,’ after ‘cryptography,’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) in subparagraph (I), by inserting ‘, crimes against children, and organized crime’ after ‘intellectual property’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(b) Computer and Network Security Research Grants- Section 4(a)(3) of such Act (

‘(A) $90,000,000 for fiscal year 2013;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) $90,000,000 for fiscal year 2014; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(C) $90,000,000 for fiscal year 2015.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Computer and Network Security Research Centers- Section 4(b) of such Act (

(1) in paragraph (4)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(A) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘and’ after the semicolon;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(B) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period and inserting ‘; and’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

‘(E) how the center will partner with government laboratories, for-profit entities, other institutions of higher education, or nonprofit research institutions.’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in paragraph (7) by striking subparagraphs (A) through (E) and inserting the following new subparagraphs:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

‘(A) $4,500,000 for fiscal year 2013;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) $4,500,000 for fiscal year 2014; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(C) $4,500,000 for fiscal year 2015.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Computer and Network Security Capacity Building Grants- Section 5(a)(6) of such Act (

‘(A) $19,000,000 for fiscal year 2013;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) $19,000,000 for fiscal year 2014; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(C) $19,000,000 for fiscal year 2015.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(e) Scientific and Advanced Technology Act Grants- Section 5(b)(2) of such Act (

‘(A) $2,500,000 for fiscal year 2013;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) $2,500,000 for fiscal year 2014; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(C) $2,500,000 for fiscal year 2015.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(f) Graduate Traineeships in Computer and Network Security- Section 5(c)(7) of such Act (

‘(A) $24,000,000 for fiscal year 2013;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) $24,000,000 for fiscal year 2014; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(C) $24,000,000 for fiscal year 2015.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(g) Cyber Security Faculty Development Traineeship Program- Section 5(e) of such Act (

SEC. 106. FEDERAL CYBER SCHOLARSHIP FOR SERVICE PROGRAM.
(a) In General- The Director of the National Science Foundation shall continue a Scholarship for Service program under section 5(a) of the Cyber Security Research and Development Act (

(b) Characteristics of Program- The program under this section shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) provide, through qualified institutions of higher education, scholarships that provide tuition, fees, and a competitive stipend for up to 2 years to students pursing a bachelor’s or master’s degree and up to 3 years to students pursuing a doctoral degree in a cybersecurity field;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) provide the scholarship recipients with summer internship opportunities or other meaningful temporary appointments in the Federal information technology workforce; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(3) increase the capacity of institutions of higher education throughout all regions of the United States to produce highly qualified cybersecurity professionals, through the award of competitive, merit-reviewed grants that support such activities as--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(A) faculty professional development, including technical, hands-on experiences in the private sector or government, workshops, seminars, conferences, and other professional development opportunities that will result in improved instructional capabilities;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(B) institutional partnerships, including minority serving institutions and community colleges; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(C) development of cybersecurity-related courses and curricula.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(c) Scholarship Requirements-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) ELIGIBILITY- Scholarships under this section shall be available only to students who--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(A) are citizens or permanent residents of the United States;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(B) are full-time students in an eligible degree program, as determined by the Director, that is focused on computer security or information assurance at an awardee institution; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(C) accept the terms of a scholarship pursuant to this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) SELECTION- Individuals shall be selected to receive scholarships primarily on the basis of academic merit, with consideration given to financial need, to the goal of promoting the participation of individuals identified in section 33 or 34 of the Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act (

(A) served on active duty (other than active duty for training) in the Armed Forces of the United States for a period of more than 180 consecutive days, and who was discharged or released therefrom under conditions other than dishonorable; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(B) served on active duty (other than active duty for training) in the Armed Forces of the United States and was discharged or released from such service for a service-connected disability before serving 180 consecutive days.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

For purposes of subparagraph (B), the term ‘service-connected’ has the meaning given such term under

(3) SERVICE OBLIGATION- If an individual receives a scholarship under this section, as a condition of receiving such scholarship, the individual upon completion of their degree must serve as a cybersecurity professional within the Federal workforce for a period of time as provided in paragraph (5). If a scholarship recipient is not offered employment by a Federal agency or a federally funded research and development center, the service requirement can be satisfied at the Director’s discretion by--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(A) serving as a cybersecurity professional in a State, local, or tribal government agency; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(B) teaching cybersecurity courses at an institution of higher education.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(4) CONDITIONS OF SUPPORT- As a condition of acceptance of a scholarship under this section, a recipient shall agree to provide the awardee institution with annual verifiable documentation of employment and up-to-date contact information.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(5) LENGTH OF SERVICE- The length of service required in exchange for a scholarship under this subsection shall be 1 year more than the number of years for which the scholarship was received.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(d) Failure To Complete Service Obligation-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) GENERAL RULE- If an individual who has received a scholarship under this section--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(A) fails to maintain an acceptable level of academic standing in the educational institution in which the individual is enrolled, as determined by the Director;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(B) is dismissed from such educational institution for disciplinary reasons;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(C) withdraws from the program for which the award was made before the completion of such program;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(D) declares that the individual does not intend to fulfill the service obligation under this section; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(E) fails to fulfill the service obligation of the individual under this section,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

such individual shall be liable to the United States as provided in paragraph (3).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) MONITORING COMPLIANCE- As a condition of participating in the program, a qualified institution of higher education receiving a grant under this section shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(A) enter into an agreement with the Director of the National Science Foundation to monitor the compliance of scholarship recipients with respect to their service obligation; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(B) provide to the Director, on an annual basis, post-award employment information required under subsection (c)(4) for scholarship recipients through the completion of their service obligation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(3) AMOUNT OF REPAYMENT-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(A) LESS THAN ONE YEAR OF SERVICE- If a circumstance described in paragraph (1) occurs before the completion of 1 year of a service obligation under this section, the total amount of awards received by the individual under this section shall be repaid or such amount shall be treated as a loan to be repaid in accordance with subparagraph (C).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(B) MORE THAN ONE YEAR OF SERVICE- If a circumstance described in subparagraph (D) or (E) of paragraph (1) occurs after the completion of 1 year of a service obligation under this section, the total amount of scholarship awards received by the individual under this section, reduced by the ratio of the number of years of service completed divided by the number of years of service required, shall be repaid or such amount shall be treated as a loan to be repaid in accordance with subparagraph (C). (C).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(C) REPAYMENTS- A loan described in subparagraph (A) or (B) shall be treated as a Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford Loan under part D of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (

(4) COLLECTION OF REPAYMENT-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(A) IN GENERAL- In the event that a scholarship recipient is required to repay the scholarship under this subsection, the institution providing the scholarship shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(i) be responsible for determining the repayment amounts and for notifying the recipient and the Director of the amount owed; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(ii) collect such repayment amount within a period of time as determined under the agreement described in paragraph (2), or the repayment amount shall be treated as a loan in accordance with paragraph (3)(C).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(B) RETURNED TO TREASURY- Except as provided in subparagraph (C) of this paragraph, any such repayment shall be returned to the Treasury of the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(C) RETAIN PERCENTAGE- An institution of higher education may retain a percentage of any repayment the institution collects under this paragraph to defray administrative costs associated with the collection. The Director shall establish a single, fixed percentage that will apply to all eligible entities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(5) EXCEPTIONS- The Director may provide for the partial or total waiver or suspension of any service or payment obligation by an individual under this section whenever compliance by the individual with the obligation is impossible or would involve extreme hardship to the individual, or if enforcement of such obligation with respect to the individual would be unconscionable.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(e) Hiring Authority- For purposes of any law or regulation governing the appointment of individuals in the Federal civil service, upon successful completion of their degree, students receiving a scholarship under this section shall be hired under the authority provided for in section 213.3102(r) of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, and be exempted from competitive service. Upon fulfillment of the service term, such individuals shall be converted to a competitive service position without competition if the individual meets the requirements for that position.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 107. CYBERSECURITY WORKFORCE ASSESSMENT.
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act the President shall transmit to the Congress a report addressing the cybersecurity workforce needs of the Federal Government. The report shall include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) an examination of the current state of and the projected needs of the Federal cybersecurity workforce, including a comparison of the different agencies and departments, and an analysis of the capacity of such agencies and departments to meet those needs;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) an analysis of the sources and availability of cybersecurity talent, a comparison of the skills and expertise sought by the Federal Government and the private sector, an examination of the current and future capacity of United States institutions of higher education, including community colleges, to provide current and future cybersecurity professionals, through education and training activities, with those skills sought by the Federal Government, State and local entities, and the private sector, and a description of how successful programs are engaging the talents of females and individuals identified in section 33 or 34 of the Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act (

(3) an examination of the effectiveness of the National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education, the Centers of Academic Excellence in Research, and the Federal Cyber Scholarship for Service programs in promoting higher education and research in cybersecurity and information assurance and in producing a growing number of professionals with the necessary cybersecurity and information assurance expertise, including individuals from States or regions in which the unemployment rate exceeds the national average;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(4) an analysis of any barriers to the Federal Government recruiting and hiring cybersecurity talent, including barriers relating to compensation, the hiring process, job classification, and hiring flexibilities; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(5) recommendations for Federal policies to ensure an adequate, well-trained Federal cybersecurity workforce.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 108. CYBERSECURITY UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY TASK FORCE.
(a) Establishment of University-Industry Task Force- Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall convene a task force to explore mechanisms for carrying out collaborative research, development, education, and training activities for cybersecurity through a consortium or other appropriate entity with participants from institutions of higher education and industry.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(b) Functions- The task force shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) develop options for a collaborative model and an organizational structure for such entity under which the joint research and development activities could be planned, managed, and conducted effectively, including mechanisms for the allocation of resources among the participants in such entity for support of such activities;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) propose a process for developing a research and development agenda for such entity, including guidelines to ensure an appropriate scope of work focused on nationally significant challenges and requiring collaboration;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(3) define the roles and responsibilities for the participants from institutions of higher education and industry in such entity;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(4) propose guidelines for assigning intellectual property rights and for the transfer of research and development results to the private sector; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(5) make recommendations for how such entity could be funded from Federal, State, and nongovernmental sources.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(c) Composition- In establishing the task force under subsection (a), the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall appoint an equal number of individuals from institutions of higher education, including minority-serving institutions and community colleges, and from industry with knowledge and expertise in cybersecurity.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(d) Report- Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall transmit to the Congress a report describing the findings and recommendations of the task force.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(e) Termination- The task force shall terminate upon transmittal of the report required under subsection (d).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(f) Compensation and Expenses- Members of the task force shall serve without compensation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 109. CYBERSECURITY AUTOMATION AND CHECKLISTS FOR GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS.
Section 8(c) of the Cyber Security Research and Development Act (

‘(c) Security Automation and Checklists for Government Systems-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) IN GENERAL- The Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall develop, and revise as necessary, security automation standards, associated reference materials (including protocols), and checklists providing settings and option selections that minimize the security risks associated with each information technology hardware or software system and security tool that is, or is likely to become, widely used within the Federal Government in order to enable standardized and interoperable technologies, architectures, and frameworks for continuous monitoring of information security within the Federal Government.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) PRIORITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT- The Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall establish priorities for the development of standards, reference materials, and checklists under this subsection on the basis of--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(A) the security risks associated with the use of the system;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) the number of agencies that use a particular system or security tool;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(C) the usefulness of the standards, reference materials, or checklists to Federal agencies that are users or potential users of the system;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(D) the effectiveness of the associated standard, reference material, or checklist in creating or enabling continuous monitoring of information security; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(E) such other factors as the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology determines to be appropriate.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(3) EXCLUDED SYSTEMS- The Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology may exclude from the application of paragraph (1) any information technology hardware or software system or security tool for which such Director determines that the development of a standard, reference material, or checklist is inappropriate because of the infrequency of use of the system, the obsolescence of the system, or the inutility or impracticability of developing a standard, reference material, or checklist for the system.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(4) DISSEMINATION OF STANDARDS AND RELATED MATERIALS- The Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall ensure that Federal agencies are informed of the availability of any standard, reference material, checklist, or other item developed under this subsection.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(5) AGENCY USE REQUIREMENTS- The development of standards, reference materials, and checklists under paragraph (1) for an information technology hardware or software system or tool does not--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(A) require any Federal agency to select the specific settings or options recommended by the standard, reference material, or checklist for the system;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(B) establish conditions or prerequisites for Federal agency procurement or deployment of any such system;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(C) imply an endorsement of any such system by the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(D) preclude any Federal agency from procuring or deploying other information technology hardware or software systems for which no such standard, reference material, or checklist has been developed or identified under paragraph (1).’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 110. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY CYBERSECURITY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
Section 20 of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act (

‘(e) Intramural Security Research- As part of the research activities conducted in accordance with subsection (d)(3), the Institute shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) conduct a research program to develop a unifying and standardized identity, privilege, and access control management framework for the execution of a wide variety of resource protection policies and that is amenable to implementation within a wide variety of existing and emerging computing environments;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) carry out research associated with improving the security of information systems and networks;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(3) carry out research associated with improving the testing, measurement, usability, and assurance of information systems and networks; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(4) carry out research associated with improving security of industrial control systems.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE II--ADVANCEMENT OF CYBERSECURITY TECHNICAL STANDARDSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
TITLE II--ADVANCEMENT OF CYBERSECURITY TECHNICAL STANDARDSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 201. DEFINITIONS.
In this title:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) DIRECTOR- The term ‘Director’ means the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) INSTITUTE- The term ‘Institute’ means the National Institute of Standards and Technology.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 202. INTERNATIONAL CYBERSECURITY TECHNICAL STANDARDS.
(a) In General- The Director, in coordination with appropriate Federal authorities, shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) as appropriate, ensure coordination of Federal agencies engaged in the development of international technical standards related to information system security; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, develop and transmit to the Congress a plan for ensuring such Federal agency coordination.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(b) Consultation With the Private Sector- In carrying out the activities specified in subsection (a)(1), the Director shall ensure consultation with appropriate private sector stakeholders.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 203. CLOUD COMPUTING STRATEGY.
(a) In General- The Director, in collaboration with the Federal CIO Council, and in consultation with other relevant Federal agencies and stakeholders from the private sector, shall continue to develop and encourage the implementation of a comprehensive strategy for the use and adoption of cloud computing services by the Federal Government.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(b) Activities- In carrying out the strategy developed under subsection (a), the Director shall give consideration to activities that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) accelerate the development, in collaboration with the private sector, of standards that address interoperability and portability of cloud computing services;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) advance the development of conformance testing performed by the private sector in support of cloud computing standardization; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(3) support, in consultation with the private sector, the development of appropriate security frameworks and reference materials, and the identification of best practices, for use by Federal agencies to address security and privacy requirements to enable the use and adoption of cloud computing services, including activities--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(A) to ensure the physical security of cloud computing data centers and the data stored in such centers;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(B) to ensure secure access to the data stored in cloud computing data centers;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(C) to develop security standards as required under section 20 of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act (

(D) to support the development of the automation of continuous monitoring systems.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 204. PROMOTING CYBERSECURITY AWARENESS AND EDUCATION.
(a) Program- The Director, in collaboration with relevant Federal agencies, industry, educational institutions, National Laboratories, the National Coordination Office of the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development program, and other organizations, shall continue to coordinate a cybersecurity awareness and education program to increase knowledge, skills, and awareness of cybersecurity risks, consequences, and best practices through--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) the widespread dissemination of cybersecurity technical standards and best practices identified by the Institute;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) efforts to make cybersecurity best practices usable by individuals, small to medium-sized businesses, State, local, and tribal governments, and educational institutions; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(3) efforts to attract, recruit, and retain qualified professionals to the Federal cybersecurity workforce.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(b) Strategic Plan- The Director shall, in cooperation with relevant Federal agencies and other stakeholders, develop and implement a strategic plan to guide Federal programs and activities in support of a comprehensive cybersecurity awareness and education program as described under subsection (a).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(c) Report to Congress- Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act and every 5 years thereafter, the Director shall transmit the strategic plan required under subsection (b) to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 205. IDENTITY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
The Director shall continue a program to support the development of technical standards, metrology, testbeds, and conformance criteria, taking into account appropriate user concerns, to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) improve interoperability among identity management technologies;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) strengthen authentication methods of identity management systems;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(3) improve privacy protection in identity management systems, including health information technology systems, through authentication and security protocols; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(4) improve the usability of identity management systems.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 206. AUTHORIZATIONS.
No additional funds are authorized to carry out this title and the amendments made by this title or to carry out the amendments made by sections 109 and 110 of this Act. This title and the amendments made by this title and the amendments made by sections 109 and 110 of this Act shall be carried out using amounts otherwise authorized or appropriated.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Passed the House of Representatives April 27, 2012.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Attest:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Clerk. 112th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 2096 AN ACT

Clerk.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
OC Blog Articles Related To This Bill
- Videos from Personal Democracy Forum Conference 2012 Jun 13, 2012
- With SOPA Shelved, Congress Readies its Next Attack on the Internet Feb 13, 2012
- Anti-Web Censorship Bill Protest from Our Perspective at OC Feb 08, 2012
- Join the Public Mark-up of SOPA Nov 19, 2011
- After Weeks of Delay, Senate Small Biz Jobs Bill in Jeopardy Apr 20, 2011

U.S. Congress - Text of H.R.2096 as Referred in Senate Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2011



