U.S. Congress - H.R.2400 Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011
H.R.2400 - Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011
To prevent States from prohibiting male circumcision. view all titles (2)
All Bill Titles
- Official: To prevent States from prohibiting male circumcision. as introduced.
- Short: Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011 as introduced.
This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.
Bill's Views
- Today: 3
- Past Seven Days: 11
- All-Time: 1,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Official Summary
6/24/2011--Introduced.Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011 - Prohibits a state or a political subdivision from adopting or continuing in force a law, regulation, or order that prohibits or regulates the circumcision of males who have not attained the age of 18 years and whoseOfficial Summary
6/24/2011--Introduced.Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011 - Prohibits a state or a political subdivision from adopting or continuing in force a law, regulation, or order that prohibits or regulates the circumcision of males who have not attained the age of 18 years and whose parent or guardian has consented to the circumcision, unless such law, regulation, or order applies to all such circumcisions performed in the state and is limited to ensuring that all such circumcisions are performed in a hygienic manner....Read the Rest
Latest Letters to Congress
-
H.R.2400 Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011
nancyinabq
March 03, 2012
I am writing as your constituent in the 1st Congressional district of New Mexico. I strongly and absolutely oppose H.R.2400 - Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011, and am tracking it using OpenCongress.org, the free public resource website for government transparency and accountability.
It is absolutely incomprehensible that this nation still does not protect baby boys under the same law that currently protects girls from genital alteration, mutilation, or unnecessary cosmetic... -
H.R.2400 Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011
noticebag
January 24, 2012
I am writing as your constituent in the 5th Congressional district of Pennsylvania.
I oppose H.R.2400 - Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011.
In this country we protect the basic human rights of all girls, regardless of religious objections, to not have to endure the physical and psychological trauma of genital mutilation. However, we seem determined to allow this practice when it comes to boys. Genital mutilation is genital mutilation whether performed on a girl or a boy and ... -
H.R.2400 Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011
gamble6x
January 23, 2012
I am writing as your constituent in the 3rd Congressional district of Iowa. I oppose H.R.2400 - Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011, and am tracking it using OpenCongress.org, the free public resource website for government transparency and accountability.
As a circumcised male I stand firmly in opposition to any further cultural genital mutilation of our youth. Parents are not permitted to ok any other elective aesthetic surgery that has a chance of death, yet circumcision i...
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
