H.R.3261 - Stop Online Piracy Act

To promote prosperity, creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation by combating the theft of U.S. property, and for other purposes. view all titles (7)

All Bill Titles

  • Popular: SOPA as .
  • Popular: Stop Online Piracy Act as introduced.
  • Short: Stop Online Piracy Act as introduced.
  • Official: To promote prosperity, creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation by combating the theft of U.S. property, and for other purposes. as introduced.
  • Popular: Enforcing and Protecting American Rights Against Sites Intent on Theft and Exploitation Act as introduced.
  • Popular: E-PARASITE Act as introduced.
  • Popular: SOPA.

This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.

Comments Feed

Displaying 1-30 of 495 total comments.

  • KingGeedorah 10/28/2011 7:08am

    This was a featured story on the front page. What happened?

  • Comm_reply
    mattk2811 11/17/2011 6:10pm

    I believe the vote was the yesterday.

  • Comm_reply
    Ishanguptaa 07/04/2012 7:10am

    I recently started reading blogs. I find this interesting. it is really nice blog. If you are interesting in having good policies for your car insurance plan, you can pay visit to ביטוח רכב. They can provide you with heavy discounts.

  • Spam Comment

  • Comm_reply
    aegold 09/17/2013 7:33am

    Thank you so much for the information you have shared with jual jaket online itu ada di website ini us!
    I am impressed!

  • Comm_reply
    aegold 09/17/2013 7:33am

    After a child has been enriched through the process of creation that can begin to open their minds to self-discovery, as reflected in his artistic creations. It is during this process that the child will learn a lot about themselves and discover new ways to see the world and experience the jual jaket online itu ada di website ini life-affirming behaviors.

  • Comm_reply
    goofoofighter 11/17/2011 8:42pm

    The bill was heard in Congress yesterday. Discussion, amendment, and voting are still to come.

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • Comm_reply
    aegold 09/17/2013 7:34am

    Thank you so much for the information you have shared with us!
    I am impressed!

  • Spam Comment

  • Comm_reply
    Ishanguptaa 07/04/2012 7:17am

    I recently started reading blogs and i found it very interesting and meaningful. If you are interested in getting higher discounts at your car insurance policies, you can visit to ביטוח רכב. They provide very good plans.

  • starwood 10/28/2011 9:24am
    Link Reply
    + 21

    I don’t know whats going on or what, but I’m hearing that the government is wanting to track our every move on the internet?! Isn’t that invasion of privacy? I don’t understand what the fuss is about being able to download songs for personal use you can get cd’s at the library for free are they going to go after them too? we are able to record off the radio also are the going to take away our radio also? Where will it end? I think this bill is just wrong and unfair and I don’t see the point if we are using it for pursonal use only and not selling it.

  • Comm_reply
    underlordgc 11/17/2011 4:23pm
    “I don’t understand what the fuss is about being able to download songs for personal use you can get cd’s at the library for free are they going to go after them too?”

    according to this bill, if the holder of the copyright wants it removed then yes, it will be removed.

  • Comm_reply
    CentristFiasco 12/20/2011 9:36am

    You’ve been told lies by the bloggers.

  • Comm_reply
    stephenmac7 01/08/2012 1:27pm

    If you read the text you’ll know what’s true and what’s not. You’re the one telling lies now.

  • Spam Comment

  • Comm_reply
    kdizzle 01/20/2012 1:28pm

    You make some excellent points in your argument, but there are some logical holes.

    1. The government can (and is) already tracking our every move. Not to mention Facebook, Google, our mobile phone providers, internet service providers, hackers, and others.
    2. CDs at the library. Good point.
    3. Radio Recording. Good point, but do people still do that? What do they use to record the music?

    The question is do we believe in protecting intellectual property, and how do we do it? I am pretty sure that if you had an invention or idea, and someone else used that idea to make money off of it you would sue them. In our modern day it is very difficult to protect intellectual property because our technological advances coupled with our access to the technology (ie. computers). If people use/steal your idea and share it with others you will not be compensated. Potentially millions of people could benefit from your idea, and you wouldn’t receive a penny from it. Now THAT is wrong and unfair.

  • Comm_reply
    nullcure 01/22/2012 2:23pm

    kdizzle. you can record the internet for instance..

    www.waaf.com

    Listen now.

    Open sound recorder.

    Set recording device to “What You Hear”

    Hit record.

    save mp3

  • Comm_reply
    thomsonjeff123 02/16/2012 1:26am

    This is my first opportunity to visit this website. I found some interesting things and I will apply to the development of my blog. Thanks for sharing useful information.

    Business Logo Design | Logo Design Service | Professional Logo Design

  • CurtisNeeley 11/04/2011 1:43pm

    This bill sounds regulatory but is another lawyer game and only protects those who purchase “copyrites” as required in §411

    What a NOT funny f’ing joke.

    Copyrite is a backwards American law that I have called unconstitutional in United States Courts for over three years. The appeal is pending to be dismissed in order to allow search engines to continue to traffic in my nude art to anonymous people who could be minors. I also demand the FCC to regulate wire communications as required by law since 1934.

    Appellant Brief PDF

  • Comm_reply
    jonez734 11/16/2011 6:32pm

    Recording from an FM station will be made much more difficult when the system is “upgraded” to digital and analog stations are “phased out”. It might be legal to record from the radio, but it will be darn near impossible to do so in the near future.

  • Comm_reply
    johnmarkfoley 11/30/2011 12:15am

    actually, every signal intended for human ears eventually becomes an analog signal. after it leaves the device into a wire leading to a speaker or headphones it becomes as recordable as any old school radio signal.

  • Comm_reply
    aegold 09/17/2013 7:36am

    actually, every signal jual jaket online itu ada di website ini intended for human ears eventually becomes an analog signal. after it leaves the device into a wire leading to a speaker or headphones it becomes as recordable as any old school radio signal.

  • molonlabe 11/04/2011 7:39pm

    Intellectual property (IP) was invented by staists in furtherance of crony capitalism. IP is really a ridiculous idea if you think about it. I highly recommend this book to those interested in reading more on the subject http://mises.org/books/against.pdf

  • Comm_reply
    CurtisNeeley 11/04/2011 11:40pm

    The “natural rights” rational v “utilitarian rights” rational are mutually exclusive rationals for IP that is very obvious but apparently was over N. Stephan Kinsella’s logical abilities? This may have came from the incorrect claim on page fifteen.

    “Only A has the right to copy the book (hence, ‘copyright’”

    N. Stephan Kinsella therein reveals a fundamental logical error. There are no “natural rights” involved whatsoever in United States copy[]right or IP laws. The rite of printing a book was initially called a “right” when Queen Anne allowed one printer to control all printing unless another party was given permission to print. The first copyrite statute in about 1710 or Statute of Anne. I agree with the claim that a personal right can not last longer than a person lives.
    Appellant Brief PDF

  • molonlabe 11/05/2011 12:15pm

    I could understand who someone could IP as far as exact copies of movies, music, movies and books go. But, when it comes to someone incorporating a part of another person’s IP in their own original work like remixes of songs or even something more mundane like a mother posting a video of their child dancing to a song on you tube civil or criminal penalties for those actions are simply indefensible. Patents on drugs or chemicals are completely ridiculous. Patenting a chemical compound is like patenting the color blue or the process of making a sandwich. Patents like that only hurt consumers. The only reason drug companies need patents to earn crazy profits is the oppressive over-regulation perpetrated by the FDA. If it wasn’t for the ridiculous drug regulations healthcare would be much cheaper too.

  • walker7 11/06/2011 2:54am
    Link Reply
    + 40

    We will never be ready for Internet censorship. This bill is overly broad, and therefore it is too ridiculous. It is very important that you should oppose this bill and save the Internet!

  • Comm_reply
    CurtisNeeley 11/08/2011 10:40am

    Internet censorship has been required by law since 1934 but has not been done by a free pornography loving United States. The end of the pornternet is at hand. Appeal Brief


Vote on This Bill

1% Users Support Bill

32 in favor / 3128 opposed
 

Send Your Rep a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC

Top-Rated Comments