H.R.3261 - Stop Online Piracy Act

To promote prosperity, creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation by combating the theft of U.S. property, and for other purposes. view all titles (6)

All Bill Titles

  • Popular: Stop Online Piracy Act as introduced.
  • Short: Stop Online Piracy Act as introduced.
  • Official: To promote prosperity, creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation by combating the theft of U.S. property, and for other purposes. as introduced.
  • Popular: Enforcing and Protecting American Rights Against Sites Intent on Theft and Exploitation Act as introduced.
  • Popular: E-PARASITE Act as introduced.
  • Popular: SOPA.

This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.

Comments Feed

Displaying 301-330 of 488 total comments.

Spam Comment

CurtisNeeley 12/16/2011 1:46am
in reply to Irisiridescent Dec 15, 2011 11:16pm

There are roughly 212,646,642 MORE users of the Internet in China than in the United States. They easily use the Internet more than any two countries on earth.

The SOPA bill was discharged from the subcommittee yesterday.

Has a political career ever ended because of ONE vote? The SOPA bill is largely irrelevant except to studios or corporations until the copy[rite] act is found unconstitutional since the 1976 vague 4-factor codification of “fair-use”.
See USC 17 §107

FreeRoamer 12/16/2011 5:18am

Wow, look at that, this bill is sponsored by Lamar Smith, the same guy who wrote up the Protecting Children from Internet Pornographers act and the same guy who is blocking the legalization of marijuana bill. Go figure, lol man this guy hates civil liberties.

Spam Comment

WasMiddleClass 12/15/2011 10:02pm
in reply to CurtisNeeley Dec 13, 2011 4:23pm

Why do you think a law worded in the days when the situation now was only science fiction should be applied now, and could possibly help anything?

We have tons of arcane federal laws that were never updated to reflect current reality, such as the one that says you can not use any “telecommunication device” to contact anyone anonymously that “annoys” them without being thrown in prison for two years, and fined huge amounts of money.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/47/223.html

And you want another one?

Spam Comment

CentristFiasco 12/20/2011 10:00am
in reply to Irisiridescent Dec 15, 2011 11:16pm

No it wouldn’t be political suicide if passed because if you actually read the bill and gain an understanding on what’s going in then you would know that this bill is needed.

cadaverousmob 12/20/2011 12:19pm
in reply to CentristFiasco Dec 20, 2011 9:54am

No, it’s called if your IP is caught downloading illegal music then you are caught red-handed downloading illegal music! That’s exactly how DHS and the RIAA catch people who download illegal content: by IP address—duh! Whether you delete the content later or not doesn’t matter because you have already downloaded it. That’s like stealing a cell phone from the store then later returning it but it doesn’t matter because you already stole it—duh! It ain’t rocket science! hahaha

So if the RIAA and DHS are caught the same way (IP addresses directly linked to downloading illegal music), then they should be punished, too! But it’s obvious you support this bill because you work for them or are associated with them. As of this moment, only 14 favor this bill while 1557 do not! That tells you right there that you are a tr011. haha

Spam Comment

Spam Comment

WasMiddleClass 12/20/2011 10:53pm

I’ll post this article here because it actually does have a lot to do with this bill in the big picture of things…

The Defining Issue: Not Government’s Size, But Who It’s For

The defining political issue of 2012 won’t be the government’s size. It will be who government is for.

Americans have never much liked government. After all, the nation was conceived in a revolution against government.
But the surge of cynicism now engulfing America isn’t about government’s size. It’s the growing perception that government isn’t working for average people. It’s for big business, Wall Street, and the very rich instead.
In a recent Pew Foundation poll, 77 percent of respondents said too much power is in the hands of a few rich people and corporations.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-reich/the-defining-issue-not-go_b_1159294.html?ref=yahoo&ir=Yahoo

Spam Comment

cadaverousmob 12/23/2011 2:35pm
in reply to CurtisNeeley Dec 23, 2011 12:44pm

Did you fail reading comprehension in middle school? I wrote it as plain as day: no one cares what YOU propose. Last I checked, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! didn’t call CurtisNeeley up to ask for your sage advice or what you propose because again, no one cares what YOU propose. Get it? haha Geez, it’s like talking to a wall.

But of course, Google and the other corps do care about what SOPA will do. Which is why we want to stop it, So again, learn to read: no one cares what YOU propose but we all care to end SOPA. Get it? Now go back to learning how to read before you post.

Your quote: “ALL traffic to violating IPs and POOF; -foreign DNS blocked. Simple.”
My response: No, you’re wrong. As a network engineer, there are lots of others ways to get around firewalls. Hell, how do you think hackers in China get out of their firewalls? Please leave the technical stuff to real experts like me and stop with the bullsh*t OPINIONS. haha

retched 12/21/2011 3:43am

I have a question for CurtisNeeley who is seemingly intent on shutting down the “Pornternet” and the passage of this bill.

You seem to be comparing the China, Iran like clauses of the SOPA and PIPA bills to the actual regulation of China and Iran. So to you I ask, have you read the bill and do you understand what the bill does? Because I’m sure if you did, you can see why the bill literally cripples the internet, ruins innocent people’s works, and does nothing but creates a confuddled mess of things.

So before I go raging on about why this bill is bad… I wanted to know where you stand or if you’re bandwagoning onto this bill because your case in the Appeals Circuit Court would also be subsequently affected.

Furthermore, I will also say piracy is also bad and while a measure should be enacted… wait, we have the DMCA already… Why is this bill being considered again?

GamerLEN 12/20/2011 4:13pm

Well, looks like it won’t be happening tomorrow after all.

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111220/11175317144/lamar-smith-says-just-joking-about-tomorrow-sopa-markup-postponed.shtml

Personally I think that’s about the most boneheaded move that Smith could’ve made. Next year is an election year and nobody is going to want to go anywhere near a bill as controversial as this one during an election year. Even if it does go through Obama would probably veto it for the same reason in reverse, to get every single net-geek, techie, and so on voting for him in November (because, y’know, Gingrich or Romney stood a chance in hell anyways).

Looks like the internet may be safe after all.

Spam Comment

Spam Comment

Spam Comment

CurtisNeeley 12/22/2011 2:25am
in reply to CurtisNeeley Dec 22, 2011 1:39am

… GOOG asserted the unused REP as rational for continued display of thumbnails that violate copy[rite] overseas. GOOG, however, has not followed my request to NOT be indexed for OVER THREE YEARS! GOOG will claim no robots.txt file existed or was done incorrectly. I have HUNDREDS of witnesses and raw log files detailing records of hundreds of accesses by GOOG. A matter for trial! My site returned in over 18,000 searches at GOOG last month. I know the search terms that resulted in appearances … I requested NOT to be indexed OVER THREE YEARS GO!

GOOG scanned 17 million PLUS books in NY and are serial violators of copy[rite]. They scanned a book there with my nude images inside and re-published three more nudes by me WHILE FACING ME IN COURT FOR THE SAME! (Author’s Guild, et al v Google Inc) is nothing but conspiring with publishers to stretch “fair-use” around CRIME-scans

Non-profit search engine exceeding GOOG with user definable algorithms will soon be sought.

CurtisNeeley 12/21/2011 9:16am
in reply to CurtisNeeley Dec 21, 2011 9:07am

The DMCA is a ridiculous HOAX. I notified Google Inc, NameMedia Inc, and the Microsoft Corporation DMCA agents as well as the US Attorney General and the FCC. I have been ignored by everyone thus far except NameMedia Inc but only after nine months in court.

GOOG and MSFT image search engines fundamentally violate International law and could be fixed to not do so easily.

Spam Comment

GamerLEN 12/23/2011 3:30pm

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111223/09051617180/law-firms-removing-their-name-sopa-supporters-list-sopa-support-crumbling.shtml

Whoops! There goes another one! Gotta stay on your toes with these guys. :P

Spam Comment

CurtisNeeley 12/23/2011 5:44pm
in reply to cadaverousmob Dec 23, 2011 2:35pm

Google Inc and others have faced me in United States District Court and now face me before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Google Inc will face me before the Supreme Court eventually. I have talked to Senators and Representatives already. SOPA will be entirely irrelevant once my federal lawsuit resolves and the FCC begins to REGULATE Internet wire communications content.

I already declined settling and will NOT settle and allow unregulated Internet wire communications to exist! Absolutely no amount of money will buy me off and if I die there are others who will continue my lawsuit.

Went to school before “middle schools” were invented though not in the days of one-room schools. Yahoo does not have an image search and is FOR SALE as lost cause.

I could build a search engine easily surpassing GOOG with user-definable search algorithms and will if needed and give it away! Have a Merry Christmas and celebrate the LAST Christmas with unregulated Internet wire communicatopms.

Spam Comment

cadaverousmob 12/23/2011 7:30pm
in reply to CurtisNeeley Dec 23, 2011 5:44pm

Your—very insane—quotes: “I could build a search engine easily surpassing GOOG[LE],” “Google Inc will face me before the Supreme Court,” and “SOPA will be entirely irrelevant once my federal lawsuit resolves.”

Dude, whatever you’re smoking, I want none. haha You are so delusional it’s really not even funny. And with your last statement, you revealed that you are: A) working for the RIAA; B) working for the government; C) in bed with either; D) all of the above. Any answer is the right one. :)

The simple overarching fact is that this bill is already sinking to the bottom of the metaphorical ocean. You’ve got previous supporters like GoDaddy and Gibson Guitar who are jumping ship so maybe you should jump ship, too. But please, for our sake, DON’T wear a life vest. hahaha

WasMiddleClass 12/23/2011 10:56pm
in reply to GamerLEN Dec 23, 2011 10:21pm

I know. It’s like they want a cop to sit in front of their house all day to make sure their kids dont run out into traffic…

Spam Comment

Spam Comment

cadaverousmob 12/24/2011 11:05pm

Go Daddy lost 21,054 domains in 1 day because of SOPA: http://thenextweb.com/insider/2011/12/24/go-daddy-lost-21054-domains-yesterday-in-wake-of-sopa-pr-disaster/?awesm=tnw.to_1CMq1&utm_campaign=social+media&utm_medium=Spreadus&utm_source=Twitter&utm_content=Go+Daddy+lost+21%2C054+domains+yesterday+in+wake+of+SOPA+PR+disaster


Vote on This Bill

1% Users Support Bill

32 in favor / 3122 opposed
 

Send Your Rep a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC
Save to Notebook Make A Bill Widget

Top-Rated Comments

OpenCongress is a free and open-source project of the Participatory Politics Foundation, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization with a mission to increase civic engagement. The non-profit Sunlight Foundation is the Founding and Primary Supporter of OpenCongress.