H.R.3261 - Stop Online Piracy Act

To promote prosperity, creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation by combating the theft of U.S. property, and for other purposes. view all titles (7)

All Bill Titles

  • Popular: SOPA as .
  • Popular: Stop Online Piracy Act as introduced.
  • Short: Stop Online Piracy Act as introduced.
  • Official: To promote prosperity, creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation by combating the theft of U.S. property, and for other purposes. as introduced.
  • Popular: Enforcing and Protecting American Rights Against Sites Intent on Theft and Exploitation Act as introduced.
  • Popular: E-PARASITE Act as introduced.
  • Popular: SOPA.

This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.

Comments Feed

Displaying 421-450 of 495 total comments.

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 8:15pm

All this talk of 1934 is making me feel old (older)!

There have been a few changes since then.

http://it.ojp.gov/default.aspx?area=privacy&page=1288

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 9:06pm
in reply to CurtisNeeley Jan 05, 2012 8:54pm

You are always here? Hmmm…

Anyways…

Do you really believe the FCC could ever regulate the Internet? Do you think declaring war on people that DOD, and every other three letter name, already worries about is a good idea?

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 9:07pm
in reply to WasMiddleClass Jan 05, 2012 9:06pm

I don’t!

We don’t need ever hacker on the planet pissed off at us!

CurtisNeeley 01/05/2012 8:54pm
in reply to WasMiddleClass Jan 05, 2012 8:15pm

http://futureofmedia.uservoice.com/forums/38396-what-government-policies-could-improve-the-news-an/suggestions/2155461-regulate-wire-communications-as-is-the-fcc-mission

Yes, things have changed since 1934. Nuclear weapons were created and used by the United States. Telegraph machine speeds increased into the gigahertz and were then called computers instead. A wire-line for unregulated communications developed and was called a unique and wholly new medium in error. See ACLU v. Reno, United States Supreme Court (June 1997) This common wire-line was finally regulated by the FCC just as television and telephones.

The last sentence has not happened yet but pends before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals since Sept 19, 2011.

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 9:16pm

From your FCC link Mr Neeley:

“The FCC should run a search engine and fine for inappropriate wire communications”.

Good luck with that fantasy…

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 9:50pm
in reply to walker7 Jan 05, 2012 9:34pm

@ “if you have an in-person meeting with your senators”

Good luck with that. From all my activist stuff I found you are lucky to even get them on the phone.

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 9:45pm
in reply to WasMiddleClass Jan 05, 2012 9:41pm

And why the hell does Microsoft keep sending me so damn many patches!?

I thought the NSA helped design windows 7…

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 10:06pm

@"Demanding the numerical IP address and the alias for the numerical IP address would be ordered blocked at the same time".

Do you have some super secret insider information?

I’ll send that to the experts…

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 10:11pm
in reply to WasMiddleClass Jan 05, 2012 10:06pm

So that would be kind of like the phone company being ordered to bock phone numbers you want to call?

1-867-5309

“sorry, you are not allowed to call this number”

CurtisNeeley 01/05/2012 10:13pm
in reply to WasMiddleClass Jan 05, 2012 9:45pm

“Patches” are often nothing but user identifiers and profiling.

Want to see REAL HACKING <<< click the text and read of the future. Every lead attorney for every party in BOTH copy[rite]/internet cases have copies.

Wire communications << Link to statutory definition. Even those called the internet will soon be as safe as TV for children.

Spam Comment

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 9:41pm
in reply to CurtisNeeley Jan 05, 2012 9:33pm

“I am not afraid of ANY hacker and “hacking” is not some mysterious technique and requires capitalizing on human errors, leaks, and naivety.”

Hmmmm…

Then why have we been frantically trying to hire hackers to defend against hackers with some of our most “secure” systems?

I think you need to expand your reading more Mr Neeley.

CurtisNeeley 01/05/2012 9:33pm
in reply to WasMiddleClass Jan 05, 2012 9:06pm

1. Yes the FCC could regulate wire communications and they WILL because regulating wire communications is already required by law.
2. I am not afraid of ANY hacker and “hacking” is not some mysterious technique and requires capitalizing on human errors, leaks, and naivety.
3. The locally stored DNS work-around you suggested is less than trivial to defeat and would NOT work. Demanding the numerical IP address and the alias for the numerical IP address would be ordered blocked at the same time. Access to a blocked site is impossible except on an intra net.
4. I am not always here but I visit this link regularly and will till SOPA passes or is irrelevant.
5. I do extremely good figurenude photography and did very good nudes for twenty years. They are all over the Internet and I can’t control them because of Google Inc and Microsoft Corporation.

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 9:55pm
in reply to CurtisNeeley Jan 05, 2012 9:50pm

So……only your porn is being censored?

I know some Wikipedia folks…

And I know sites that have no problem blocking bots…

Is that your real picture on the FCC site?

Oh boy…….

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 10:24pm

@Mr Neeley

I already researched your case…

Your apparent need for retribution does not out-way the needs of the rest of the planet…

Or the overwhelming will…

WasMiddleClass 12/24/2011 12:04am
in reply to retched Dec 23, 2011 2:08am

I bet you would be better than what we have now :)

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 10:46pm
in reply to WasMiddleClass Jan 05, 2012 10:35pm

The things you get yourself into :=)

We have some new info on that posted now.

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 10:48pm
in reply to WasMiddleClass Jan 05, 2012 10:46pm

Ooops wrong page here with that post.

Too much going on at one time these days….

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 11:34pm
in reply to CurtisNeeley Jan 05, 2012 10:56pm

So what?

75.127.65.162

And I dont live in Georgia, though I kind of wish I did about now…

That is just a basic everyday VPN I run to stop corporate tracking…

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 10:35pm

@Curtis Neeley:

“CENSOR the INTERNET  or else I will continue to sue google Inc and Microsoft Corporation and the Federal Communications Commission for republishing or allowing republishing of my nude art out-of-context to minors by wire.” 

http://open.salon.com/blog/curtisneeley/2011/11/30/censor_the_internet_please

“It is no secret that internet wire communication are used for pornography disguised as free speech by fifty-percent or more of United States citizens including men, women, pastors, lawyers, and sitting judges.  It is no secret this action is before the United States Courts.  This action is being hoped to go away if ignored as is now obvious but which will not occur. “

http://open.salon.com/blog/curtisneeley/2012/01/04/intellectual_property_rights_versus_rites

Huh!?

CurtisNeeley 01/05/2012 10:56pm
in reply to WasMiddleClass Jan 05, 2012 10:35pm

69.113.107.59
72.204.36.177

Well I do not want to spend money on high enough quality host to reject by IPs although I have a website that does. I have several websites and I am NOT in New York but in Fayetteville Ark.

HACK

IPs altered to protect privacy.

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 11:40pm

That place was a joke.

Try this:

http://ip-check.info/?lang=en

It is from the good guys!

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 11:44pm

@Well I do not want to spend money on high enough quality host to reject by IPs

Huh?

So you changed yours…and…

Geeze!

WasMiddleClass 01/05/2012 11:59pm

This one aint bad for free…

69.197.160.67

How did we get on the topic of switching IP’s now?

This bill would make that illegal if you live in the US.

After all how could the FCC block a foreign IP from a foreign site without starting a war?

And how could they regulate foreign DNS registry’s?

CurtisNeeley 01/06/2012 12:03am
in reply to WasMiddleClass Jan 05, 2012 10:24pm

@ WasMiddleClass “I already researched your case…”

Retribution and revenge have nothing to do with my litigation. I have been offered a GREAT deal of money already to settle. This is not about compensation or punishment except for NameMedia Inc whom I wish to no longer exist. It does not matter that they deleted my STOLEN figurenude art finally after nine months in Federal Court. There are statutory damages for their actions in the millions already.

I feel Google Inc, as operating today, needs to no longer exist profitably but feel GOOG will either find alternative income sources or chase lycos, yahoo, and facebook into the internet sunset.

There is absolutely no question that I can build a much better search engine than GOOG in a year or less.
go-oogle.net <<< just wire communications for GOOG.

WasMiddleClass 01/06/2012 12:18am

Here is the problem:

This bill says it will make all software that can bypass the “blockade” illegal.

Most all software that allows you to change your IP also allows you to use a IP from another country.

The FCC/.gov can’t regulate you if you run a VPN to a foreign server, and then surf from there!

WasMiddleClass 12/23/2011 10:02pm
in reply to CurtisNeeley Dec 23, 2011 12:44pm

And who is responsible for regulating the PURCHASED internet service?

cadaverousmob 12/23/2011 4:51pm
in reply to GamerLEN Dec 23, 2011 3:30pm

lol The 2nd comment from the link says it all: “Rats leaving a sinking ship.”

CurtisNeeley 12/08/2011 12:30am
in reply to WasMiddleClass Dec 07, 2011 6:52pm

SOPA does not molest jobs, money, rights, or life unless you are violating another “persons” rights. Violating another’s “rights” is wrong. This bill/law will be irrelevant entirely when the FCC is ordered to regulate ALL wire communications as directed by law NOW! The FCC is now ignoring wire communications they are supposed to regulate.

WasMiddleClass 12/25/2011 8:59pm
in reply to GamerLEN Dec 24, 2011 5:41am

Hey…why are you sticking your tongue out at me :Þ


Vote on This Bill

1% Users Support Bill

32 in favor / 3128 opposed
 

Send Your Rep a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC

Top-Rated Comments