H.R.3261 - Stop Online Piracy Act

To promote prosperity, creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation by combating the theft of U.S. property, and for other purposes. view all titles (6)

All Bill Titles

  • Popular: Stop Online Piracy Act as introduced.
  • Short: Stop Online Piracy Act as introduced.
  • Official: To promote prosperity, creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation by combating the theft of U.S. property, and for other purposes. as introduced.
  • Popular: Enforcing and Protecting American Rights Against Sites Intent on Theft and Exploitation Act as introduced.
  • Popular: E-PARASITE Act as introduced.
  • Popular: SOPA.

This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.

Comments Feed

Displaying 211-240 of 488 total comments.

WasMiddleClass 02/14/2012 9:47pm

New Iran internet blocking

Some days ago the Iranian government has ramped up censorship in three ways: deep packet inspection (dpi) of SSL traffic, selective blocking of IP Address and TCP port combinations, and some keyword filtering.

http://anonymous-proxy-servers.net/blog/index.php?/archives/327-New-Iran-internet-blocking.html&user_language=en

Sound familiar??

Jarvisjb 02/02/2012 3:46am

Burning books…

retched 02/02/2012 8:24am
in reply to CurtisNeeley Feb 01, 2012 9:50pm

Problem with the concept that the unregulated Internet will disappear VERY SOON as you might say. If the United States agrees with you and makes filters for that kind of material, you’re essentially giving leeway to make a filtered version of the Internet… which, hey we’re fighting against all along. You’re asking the US Gov’t to step in and fix a problem which Google and MSFT and other search engines provide and that’s to give censored results in its search engines. The other problem is that the “unregulated Internet” will still be around as hey, the US can only rule here in the US. If the US makes a ruling, but say the UK doesn’t… you can’t sue the United Kingdom… Unless you have a dual citizenship somewhere, then Foreign Sovereignty still applies. The FCC cannot regulate what is show outside the borders of the United States as their own mandate applies they can only regulate North America. So your so called “Pornternet” can still exist.

CurtisNeeley 02/02/2012 1:41pm
in reply to retched Feb 02, 2012 8:24am

At least you are trying to think logically. When the proposed 47 U.S.C. §232 passes, the pornternet no longer will exist on Earth at least in the US.

GOOG and MSFT use adult filtration to fool folks like you into supporting the pornternet. It was obviously not very hard to fool those trying to keep the US pornternet around?

Porn is not accessible for more of the internet wires on Earth than can see America’s pornternet The same porn shown in the United States is NOT shown in Europe, China, or elsewhere by search engines. Did you really think that it was? REALLY? You are not the least bit anonymous while connected to wires anywhere on Earth.

ALL wire communications browsers will be required to follow a robots.txt rating system. Allowing minors to access non-FCC-compliant wire communications browsers becomes a crime. The great US pornternet disappears very quickly.

Images can be rated PER FILE now.

WasMiddleClass 12/31/2011 10:02pm
in reply to MadreGato Dec 31, 2011 7:40pm

I have been around here for a few years, and learned quite a few things…

If you watch the view counter here it always drops way off when Congress is on vacation, and goes way up on hot political topics in the media…

WasMiddleClass 02/02/2012 9:52pm
in reply to CurtisNeeley Feb 01, 2012 9:50pm

How about the Washington Post?

Anonymous claims credit for crashing FBI, DOJ sites

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/anonymous-claims-credit-for-crashing-fbi-doj-sites/2012/01/20/gIQA7vYODQ_story.html

CurtisNeeley 02/01/2012 9:50pm
in reply to WasMiddleClass Jan 31, 2012 11:11pm

I doubt that ANY site you mentioned was unable to load. “Anonymous” is just a bunch of unhappy nerds mourning the fact that the utterly unregulated Internet will disappear VERY SOON! It has existed unregulated due entirely to malfeasance of the FCC. The FCC is failing to regulate ALL wire communications including subscription cable television as required since 1934. After the Supreme Court allows the FCC to fine Fox and CBS for inappropriate television broadcasts by radio the Supreme Court will back an Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals order that the FCC regulate ALL wire communications from subscription television by wire communications to internet wire communications. The Supreme Court will back the Eighth Circuit Court ruling that the copy[rite] act has been unconstitutional since enacted in 1790 and forbid display of inappropriate art to the unauthenticated or unidentified. The Robots Exclusion Protocol will also be made statutory and required to be used.

WasMiddleClass 02/02/2012 9:53pm
in reply to CurtisNeeley Feb 02, 2012 2:04pm

This aint about your porn pictures Mr Neeley!

CurtisNeeley 02/02/2012 2:04pm
in reply to CurtisNeeley Feb 02, 2012 1:41pm

curtis neeley site:deviantart.com – via the GOOG porn engine. Filter as you wish it won’t help.
I have demanded they stop this for over three years!

jpg site:curtisneeley.com – See GOOG after demanded that GOOG and MSFT not rebroadcast my site.

jpg site:curtisneeley.com on MSFT is EMPTY as demanded!
MSFT will still going to face me in US Courts.

http://curtisneeley.deviantart.com
See the deviantart site without adult filtration bypassed.

The pornternet ends very soon!

WasMiddleClass 02/02/2012 11:22pm

Read people!

Liberate OpenGovData Now

http://www.opencongress.org/articles/view/2470-Liberate-OpenGovData-Now

CurtisNeeley 02/02/2012 11:57pm
in reply to WasMiddleClass Feb 02, 2012 9:53pm

Oh really? You think? “Internet” censorship will be about unregulated display of my nude art by wire communications against my wishes before my Federal lawsuit against GOOG is over. When 47 U.S.C. §151 is obeyed as written, ALL 47 U.S.C. §153 ¶52 wire communications will be regulated by the FCC as required. My nudes will still be allowed by wire but not to the anonymous anymore. POOF!

The laws that are on the books must be followed as written regardless of past confusion of the Courts and Congress when the obvious is pointed out clearly as has just been done by me in Federal Court filings.

I may have to do or fight a Supreme Court appeal before it is enforced but it is decided. 2 + 2 = 4 POOF

11-2558 Docket mirror

WasMiddleClass 02/03/2012 12:03am
in reply to CurtisNeeley Feb 02, 2012 11:57pm

Remember when there was that law that required news outlets to give equal time to opposition candidates????

That was good in m opinion, but ruled unconstitutional…

Yup… you are always here…

nullcure 01/22/2012 2:23pm
in reply to kdizzle Jan 20, 2012 1:28pm

kdizzle. you can record the internet for instance..

www.waaf.com

Listen now.

Open sound recorder.

Set recording device to “What You Hear”

Hit record.

save mp3

Liberty1 02/03/2012 12:32am
in reply to WasMiddleClass Feb 03, 2012 12:23am

whaaaatttt? :=)

WasMiddleClass 02/03/2012 12:41am

Nice links Curtis…

Instructions

Please enter your PACER login and password (both are case-sensitive).  If you do not have a PACER login, you may register online at http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov.

IMPORTANT NOTICE OF REDACTION RESPONSIBILITY: All filers must redact: Social Security or taxpayer-identification numbers; dates of birth; names of minor children; financial account numbers; and, in criminal cases, home addresses, in compliance with Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(5), Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1, or Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9037. This requirement applies to all documents, including attachments.

NOTICE: An access fee of $.08 per page, as approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States, will be assessed for access to this service. For more information, click here or contact the PACER Service Center at (800) 676-6856.

I wonder how many Constitutional violations are in that…..

Liberty1 02/03/2012 12:21am
in reply to WasMiddleClass Feb 03, 2012 12:16am

Like you really try in these places…

lol!

WasMiddleClass 02/03/2012 12:16am
in reply to Liberty1 Feb 03, 2012 12:13am

I can’t hide anywhere :)

WasMiddleClass 02/03/2012 12:23am
in reply to Liberty1 Feb 03, 2012 12:21am

You bastard!

:P :P :P :P!

:)

Liberty1 02/03/2012 1:16am

Perhaps Curtis is electronically challenged and needs some help to see the light?

WasMiddleClass 02/03/2012 1:30am

@BTW The FCC “fair use” political broadcast rules still apply and were NEVER found unconstitutional in spite of your … stations are required to give equal time but at an equal price.

Well…… what happened to that law we had not to long ago???

Spam Comment

WasMiddleClass 02/03/2012 1:19am
in reply to CurtisNeeley Feb 03, 2012 1:14am

Gee… thanks…

WasMiddleClass 02/03/2012 1:23am
in reply to CurtisNeeley Feb 03, 2012 1:14am

@Case law can’t make 2 + 2 into 5 regardless of how long it has been treated as five by mistake

That is how our law works!

Unless you can bring a case that overturns existing case law it stands.

I overturned case law in my state…

WasMiddleClass 02/03/2012 1:26am
in reply to Liberty1 Feb 03, 2012 1:16am

Not yet…

Spam Comment

WasMiddleClass 02/03/2012 1:43am

On February 1, 1995, Senator James Exon (D-Neb.) attempted to do what had never been done before—regulate speech on the Internet.(3) Introducing the Communications Decency Amendment (CDA), Senator Exon declared a danger to society: Barbarian pornographers are at the gate and they are using the Internet to gain access to the youth of America. Senator Exon proclaimed:
The information superhighway should not become a red light district. This legislation will keep that from happening and extend the standards of decency which have protected telephone users to new telecommunications devices.

Once passed, our children and families will be better protected from those who would electronically cruise the digital world to engage children in inappropriate communications and introductions. The Decency Act will also clearly protect citizens from electronic stalking and protect the sanctuary of the home from uninvited indecencies.(4)

CurtisNeeley 01/21/2012 1:08am
in reply to WasMiddleClass Jan 20, 2012 9:18pm

Reno v ACLU was written by Honorable John Paul Stephens. At the time of his retirement, he was the oldest member of the Court and the third-longest serving justice in the Court’s history.. He was twenty-five when the first nuclear bomb was dropped. I am sure the Internet was a mysterious “unique and wholly new medium” for him. He and four of the other confused old men/women grew up with no internet and agreed with him and felt the internet was mysterious but have now retired also. The court today still grew up with no internet but internet wire communications are not so new now.
http://open.salon.com.blog….letter <<< See why its almost over.

JeffThomson 02/15/2012 1:58am

This is my first opportunity to visit this website. I found some interesting things and I will apply to the development of my blog. Thanks for sharing useful information.

Custom Essay | GCSE Coursework | Custom Thesis

Spam Comment

Spam Comment


Vote on This Bill

1% Users Support Bill

32 in favor / 3120 opposed
 

Send Your Rep a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC
Save to Notebook Make A Bill Widget

Top-Rated Comments

OpenCongress is a free and open-source project of the Participatory Politics Foundation, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization with a mission to increase civic engagement. The non-profit Sunlight Foundation is the Founding and Primary Supporter of OpenCongress.