The easiest way to email your members of CongressDonate Now
H.R.5163 - Sunshine in the Courtroom Act of 2012
To provide for media coverage of Federal court proceedings.
Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California (for himself, Mr. CHABOT, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, and Mr. DEUTCH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
SEC. 2. FEDERAL APPELLATE AND DISTRICT COURTS.
(1) PRESIDING JUDGE- The term ‘presiding judge’ means the judge presiding over the court proceeding concerned. In proceedings in which more than 1 judge participates, the presiding judge shall be the senior active judge so participating or, in the case of a circuit court of appeals, the senior active circuit judge so participating, except that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) in en banc sittings of any United States circuit court of appeals, the presiding judge shall be the chief judge of the circuit whenever the chief judge participates; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) APPELLATE COURT OF THE UNITED STATES- The term ‘appellate court of the United States’ means any United States circuit court of appeals and the Supreme Court of the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) IN GENERAL- Except as provided under subparagraph (B), the presiding judge of an appellate court of the United States may, at the discretion of that judge, permit the photographing, electronic recording, broadcasting, or televising to the public of any court proceeding over which that judge presides.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) in the case of a proceeding involving only the presiding judge, that judge determines the action would constitute a violation of the due process rights of any party; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) in the case of a proceeding involving the participation of more than 1 judge, a majority of the judges participating determine that the action would constitute a violation of the due process rights of any party.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) AUTHORITY- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except as provided under clause (iii), the presiding judge of a district court of the United States may, at the discretion of that judge, permit the photographing, electronic recording, broadcasting, or televising to the public of any court proceeding over which that judge presides.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(I) upon the request of any witness (other than a party) in a trial proceeding, the court shall order the face and voice of the witness to be disguised or otherwise obscured in such manner as to render the witness unrecognizable to the broadcast audience of the trial proceeding; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(II) the presiding judge in a trial proceeding shall inform each witness who is not a party that the witness has the right to request the image and voice of that witness to be obscured during the witness’s testimony.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iii) EXCEPTION- The presiding judge shall not permit any action under this subparagraph if that judge determines the action would constitute a violation of the due process rights of any party.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) NO MEDIA COVERAGE OF JURORS- The presiding judge shall not permit the photographing, electronic recording, broadcasting, or televising of any juror in a trial proceeding, or of the jury selection process.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS BARRED- The decision of the presiding judge under this subsection of whether or not to permit, deny, or terminate the photographing, electronic recording, broadcasting, or televising of a court proceeding may not be challenged through an interlocutory appeal.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) GUIDELINES- The Judicial Conference of the United States may promulgate guidelines with respect to the management and administration of photographing, recording, broadcasting, or televising described under paragraphs (1) and (2).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) PROCEDURES- In the interests of justice and fairness, the presiding judge of the court in which media use is desired has discretion to promulgate rules and disciplinary measures for the courtroom use of any form of media or media equipment and the acquisition or distribution of any of the images or sounds obtained in the courtroom. The presiding judge shall also have discretion to require written acknowledgment of the rules by anyone individually or on behalf of any entity before being allowed to acquire any images or sounds from the courtroom.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink