H.R.589 - Emergency Unemployment Compensation Expansion Act of 2011

To amend title IV of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2008 to provide for additional weeks of first-tier emergency unemployment compensation, and for other purposes. view all titles (4)

All Bill Titles

  • Official: To amend title IV of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2008 to provide for additional weeks of first-tier emergency unemployment compensation, and for other purposes. as introduced.
  • Popular: Emergency Unemployment Compensation Expansion Act as introduced.
  • Popular: Emergency Unemployment Compensation Expansion Act of 2011 as introduced.
  • Short: Emergency Unemployment Compensation Expansion Act of 2011 as introduced.

Comments Feed

Displaying 2491-2520 of 4890 total comments.

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • WasMiddleClass 04/18/2011 3:43pm

    I just went to see what one 99er site had to say and I thought I made a mistake and landed on some militia’s site. Jeeze!

    This is going to be a really long election season…

  • Comm_reply
    where 04/19/2011 7:22am

    A funny bit on the new unemployed,

    www.hulu.com/watch/225440/the-simpsons-love-is-a-many-strangled-thing#s-p1-so-i0

  • Spam Comment

  • HopefromCA 04/19/2011 6:46am

    According to an article recently we now have approximately 44 million people participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Its time for Congress to start thinking about taking care of our own country. The answer is Jobs, jobs and jobs.

  • bugsy166 04/19/2011 9:08am

    Obama will be holding an interactive town hall meeting at Facebook headquarters in Palo Alto, California. Every 99er reading this needs to participate in this town hall meeting. ”I hope you’ll take a break from either friending or de-friending each other to RSVP at Facebook.com/WhiteHouse,” Obama says in the following video.

  • Comm_reply
    bugsy166 04/19/2011 10:28am

    Finally President Obama want to address us 99ers, …….what gives?

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • Legion1 04/19/2011 5:32pm

    ok “Was”, you peaked my interest, where’s the other 8?

  • Comm_reply
    WasMiddleClass 04/19/2011 5:50pm

    Ummmm…there is a link posted…

    Or you can try this one if you didn’t like that link to the story :)

    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/10-doomsday-trends-america-cant-survive-2011-04-19

  • Comm_reply
    where 04/20/2011 3:45am

    We are the butt of the elite’s newest joke, Again

    www.foxnews.com/us/2011/04/20/fla-job-center-criticized-passing-capes-unemployed/?test=latestnews

  • Comm_reply
    nancym 04/20/2011 4:46am

    Jeez, that has to be the stupidest PR campaign in the world, ever. Just think how many gas cards they could have given out to training students, how many books they could have paid for, how many trips to interviews, how many hours they could have put into searching for employers for the unemployed. Or for that matter, actually hired someone at the center part-time! Disgusting.

  • Comm_reply
    WasMiddleClass 04/20/2011 5:33am

    What the hell is wrong with those people!

  • HopefromCA 04/19/2011 8:39pm

    An article indicated that the share of Americans who said they plan to purchase a home in the next six months tumbled by 23 percent in March. This doesn’t sound like we are recovering yet.

  • Sher1 04/20/2011 3:31am

    “The New Republican Landscape” On Friday, nearly unanimous House Republicans showed just how far their mainstream has been dragged to the right. They approved on strict party lines the most regressive social legislation in many decades, embodied in a blueprint by the budget chairman, Paul Ryan. The vote, from which only four Republicans (and all Democrats) dissented, would have been unimaginable just eight years ago to a Republican Party that added a prescription drug benefit to Medicare.

    Mr. Ryan called the vote “our generation’s defining moment,” and indeed, nothing could more clearly define the choice that will face voters next year

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/18/opinion/18mon1.html?_r=3

  • Sher1 04/20/2011 3:33am
    “Six months after voters sent Republicans in large numbers to Congress and many statehouses, it is possible to see the full landscape of destruction that their policies would cause — much of which has already begun. If it was not clear before, it is obvious now that the party is fully engaged in a project to dismantle the foundations of the New Deal and the Great Society, and to liberate business and the rich from the inconveniences of oversight and taxes. At first it seemed that only a few freshmen and noisy followers of the Tea Party would support the new extremism. NYTimes – Wake-Up America!
  • Legion1 04/20/2011 4:22am

    Tell me lies…tell me sweet little lies….

    The government says there are 4.4 Americans for every available job in America.

    Micky “D’s” has 125 people show up for 3 or 4 jobs.

    Ratio for 3 jobs=41.66 applicants per job
    Ratio for 4 jobs=31.25 applicants per job

    Micky “D’s” makes a big deal out of hiring 50,000 people…

    however: Though the 50,000 jobs are new, McDonald’s usually staffs up for summer anyway, and it’s constantly gaining and losing employees. It added 50,000 new workers in April last year, so Tuesday’s blitz amounts to typical hiring, albeit compressed into a day.

  • Spam Comment

  • Comm_reply
    Legion1 04/20/2011 3:22pm

    Yes Nancy, I do know that & the point I was trying to make is that the real ratio is, I believe, a hell of a lot higher than 4.4 to 1. As I said, tell me lies….

  • Comm_reply
    nancym 04/20/2011 8:31pm

    Yes, I know what you mean. Even if statistically accurate, the 1:4.4 thing really doesn’t tell the story of what it’s like to find a job out there. Maybe the BLS should put more emphasis on one of their other statistics—like the 250,000 who are falling off EUC every WEEK this year. Out of those, no one really knows how many found jobs, but if that ratio is actually correct, that means that out of those finishing benefits, 770,000 more people per month are still without jobs and now without support. What will that mean by the end of this year???

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • WasMiddleClass 04/20/2011 5:28am

    After hearing about Grover Norquist I started to do a little research on him, and how powerful he is in shaping Republican agenda.

    The first thing that I was a little shocked at was learning about all the Republicans in DC that signed a contract with him stating that they would NEVER support ANY tax increase for any reason on any person or corporation. Even if it was making big corporations pay their share of taxes by cutting loopholes.

    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=TAXPAYER_PROTECTION_PLEDGE

  • Comm_reply
    WasMiddleClass 04/20/2011 5:28am

    The next thing I found was this,

    Norquist described three key planks of his agenda for Bush’s second term as President as being aimed at crippling the financial base of the Democratic Party. First, he told Walker, is tort reform which would mean “trial lawyers have fewer ways to get rich and can’t give as much money to the Democratic Party”

    Secondly, he said, would be legislative changes making it harder for unions to provide funding to political parties, a measure aimed primarily aimed at cutting funding to the Democratic Party. Finally, the promotion of free trade which further weakens the influence of unions.

    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Grover_Norquist

    Hmmm…attacking unions was planned back then…

  • Comm_reply
    WasMiddleClass 04/20/2011 5:45am

    This is the guy that all the Republicans signed a contact with,

    “My ideal citizen is the self-employed, homeschooling, IRA-owning guy with a concealed-carry permit. Because that person doesn’t need the goddamn government for anything,” he said describing members of the “Leave-Us-Alone Coalition”. (IRA is the acronym for Individual Retirement Account, a privately held superannuation account).

  • Comm_reply
    nancym 04/20/2011 8:35pm

    I used to cringe every time I heard that guy’s name, still do. And wondered why he got so much press. Lately I don’t see that much of him. Maybe it’s because I don’t have all the cable I used to get, but then if he’s less visible in the media, he’s probably more dangerous that way, sort of like Rove, still a force when not in the limelight.

  • Comm_reply
    WasMiddleClass 04/21/2011 4:50am

    Take at look at all the people that signed his pledge to never agree to any tax increase of any kind for any reason.

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/41212011/Taxpayer-Protection-Pledge-Signers-for-the-112th-Congress

    There was a big thing in NH a few years ago about signing the pledge violates the NH Constitution.


Vote on This Bill

74% Users Support Bill

701 in favor / 240 opposed
 

Send Your Rep a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC
Save to Notebook Make A Bill Widget

Top-Rated Comments

OpenCongress is a free and open-source project of the Participatory Politics Foundation, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization with a mission to increase civic engagement. The non-profit Sunlight Foundation is the Founding and Primary Supporter of OpenCongress.