HR 6628 IHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

112th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

2d SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

H. R. 6628CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

To amend the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 to provide for Debbie Smith grants for auditing sexual assault evidence backlogs and to establish a Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence Registry, and for other purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

December 4, 2012CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Mr. POE of Texas (for himself and Mrs. MALONEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

To amend the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 to provide for Debbie Smith grants for auditing sexual assault evidence backlogs and to establish a Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence Registry, and for other purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence Registry Act of 2012’ or the ‘SAFER Act of 2012’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 2. DEBBIE SMITH GRANTS FOR AUDITING SEXUAL ASSAULT EVIDENCE BACKLOGS.

Section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 14135) is amended--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following new paragraph:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(6) To conduct an audit consistent with subsection (n) of the samples of sexual assault evidence that are in the possession of the State or unit of local government and are awaiting testing.’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the following new paragraph:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(4) ALLOCATION OF GRANT AWARDS FOR AUDITS- For each of fiscal years 2014 through 2018, not less than 5 percent, but not more than 10 percent, of the grant amounts distributed under paragraph (1) shall, if sufficient applications to justify such amounts are received by the Attorney General, be awarded for purposes described in subsection (a)(6), provided that none of the funds required to be distributed under this paragraph shall decrease or otherwise limit the availability of funds required to be awarded to States or units of local government under paragraph (3).’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(n) Use of Funds for Auditing Sexual Assault Evidence Backlogs-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(1) ELIGIBILITY- The Attorney General may award a grant under this section to a State or unit of local government for the purpose described in subsection (a)(6) only if the State or unit of local government--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(A) submits a plan for performing the audit of samples described in such subsection; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(B) includes in such plan a good-faith estimate of the number of such samples.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(2) GRANT CONDITIONS- A State or unit of local government receiving a grant for the purpose described in subsection (a)(6)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(A) may not enter into any contract or agreement with any non-governmental vendor laboratory to conduct an audit described in subsection (a)(6); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(B) shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(i) not later than 1 year after receiving such grant--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(I) complete the audit referred to in paragraph (1)(A) in accordance with the plan submitted under such paragraph; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(II) for each sample of sexual assault evidence identified in such audit, subject to paragraph (4), enter into the Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence Registry established under subsection (o) the information listed in subsection (o)(2);CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(ii) not later than 21 days after receiving possession of a sample of sexual assault evidence that was not in the possession of the State or unit of local government at the time of the initiation of such audit, subject to paragraph (4), enter into the Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence Registry the information listed in subsection (o)(2) with respect to the sample;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(iii) not later than 30 days after a change in the status referred to in subsection (o)(2)(A)(v) of a sample with respect to which the State or unit of local government has entered information into such Registry, update such status; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(iv) provide that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(I) the chief law enforcement officer of the State or unit of local government, respectively, is the individual responsible for the compliance of the State or unit of local government, respectively, with the registry requirements under this subparagraph; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(II) the designee of such officer may fulfill the responsibility described in subclause (II) so long as such designee is an employee of the State or unit of local government, respectively, and is not an employee of any governmental laboratory or non-governmental vendor laboratory.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(3) EXTENSION OF INITIAL DEADLINE- The Attorney General may grant an extension of the deadline under paragraph (2)(B)(i) to a State or unit of local government that demonstrates that more time is required for compliance with such paragraph.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(4) SAMPLES EXEMPT FROM REGISTRY REQUIREMENT- A State or unit of local government is not required under paragraph (2) to enter into the Registry described in such paragraph information with respect to a sample of sexual assault evidence if--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(A) the sample is not considered criminal evidence (such as a sample collected anonymously from a victim who is unwilling to make a criminal complaint); orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(B) the sample relates to a sexual assault for which the prosecution of each perpetrator is barred by a statute of limitations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(5) DEFINITIONS- In this subsection:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(A) AWAITING TESTING- The term ‘awaiting testing’ means, with respect to a sample of sexual assault evidence, that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(i) the sample has been collected and is in the possession of a State or unit of local government;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(ii) DNA and other appropriate forensic analyses have not been performed on such sample; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(iii) the sample is related to a criminal case or investigation in which final disposition has not yet been reached.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(B) FINAL DISPOSITION- The term ‘final disposition’ means, with respect to a criminal case or investigation to which a sample of sexual assault evidence relates--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(i) the conviction or acquittal of all suspected perpetrators of the crime involved;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(ii) a determination by the State or unit of local government in possession of the sample that the case is unfounded; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(iii) a declaration by the victim of the crime involved that the act constituting the basis of the crime was not committed.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(C) POSSESSION-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(i) IN GENERAL- The term ‘possession’, used with respect to possession of a sample of sexual assault evidence by a State or unit of local government, includes possession by an individual who is acting as an agent of the State or unit of local government for the collection of the sample.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(ii) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION- Nothing in clause (i) shall be construed to create or amend any Federal rights or privileges for non-governmental vendor laboratories described in regulations promulgated under section 210303 of the DNA Identification Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 14131).’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 3. SEXUAL ASSAULT FORENSIC EVIDENCE REGISTRY.

(a) In General- Section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 14135), as amended by section 2 of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(o) Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence Registry-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(1) IN GENERAL- Subject to subsection (j), not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Attorney General shall establish a Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence Registry (in this section referred to as the ‘Registry’) that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(A) is administered by the Department of Justice;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(B) allows States and units of local government to enter information into the Registry about samples of sexual assault evidence that are in the possession of such States or units of local government and are awaiting testing; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(C) tracks the testing and processing of such samples.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(2) INFORMATION IN REGISTRY-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(A) IN GENERAL- A State or unit of local government that chooses to enter information into the Registry about a sample of sexual assault evidence shall include the following information:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(i) The date of the sexual assault to which the sample relates.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(ii) The city, county, or other appropriate locality where the sexual assault occurred.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(iii) The date on which the sample was collected.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(iv) The date on which information about the sample was entered into the Registry.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(v) The status of the progression of the sample through testing and other stages of the evidentiary handling process, limited to the following information:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(I) The identity of the entity in possession of the sample of untested sexual assault evidence by the State or unit of local government.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(II) The identification of the sample of untested sexual assault evidence by the State or unit of local government.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(III) The submission of the sample of untested sexual assault evidence to a laboratory for analysis, or the decision of the State or unit of local government to indefinitely refrain from submitting the sample.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(IV) The completion of the analysis of the sample of untested sexual assault evidence, or the decision of the State or unit of local government to indefinitely refrain from analyzing the sample of untested sexual assault evidence.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(vi) The date or dates after which the State or unit of local government would be barred by any applicable statutes of limitations from prosecuting a perpetrator of the sexual assault for the sexual assault.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(B) PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION- The Attorney General shall ensure that the Registry does not include personally identifiable information or details about a sexual assault that might lead to the identification of the individuals involved, except the information listed in subparagraph (A).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(3) SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(A) IN GENERAL- A State or unit of local government that chooses to enter information about a sample of sexual assault evidence into the Registry shall assign to the sample a unique numeric or alphanumeric identifier.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(B) UNIQUE IDENTIFIER REQUIRED- In assigning the identifier under subparagraph (A), a State or unit of local government may use a case-numbering system used for other purposes, but the Attorney General shall ensure that the identifier assigned to each sample is unique with respect to all samples entered by all States and units of local government.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(4) UPDATE OF INFORMATION- A State or unit of local government that chooses to enter information about a sample of sexual assault evidence into the Registry shall, not later than 30 days after a change in the status of the sample referred to in paragraph (2)(A)(v), update such status.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(5) INTERNET ACCESS- The Attorney General shall make publicly available, on an appropriate Internet website, aggregate non-individualized and non-personally identifying data compiled from information required to be entered into the registry under paragraph (2)(A), to allow for comparison of backlog data by State and unit of local government.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(6) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE- The Attorney General shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(A) provide a means by which an entity that does not have access to the Internet may enter information into the Registry; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(B) provide the technical assistance necessary to allow States and units of local government to participate in the Registry.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(7) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION- Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to require that any State or unit of local government participate in the Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence Registry established under this subsection unless the State or unit of local government--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(A) accepts a grant awarded under subsection (n); orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(B) the State or unit of local government expressly agrees to participate in the registry in accordance with the conditions enumerated in this subsection.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Funding- Section 2(j) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 14135(j)) is amended--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) by inserting ‘and for carrying out subsection (o)’ after ‘for grants under subsection (a)’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) by striking ‘2014’ and inserting ‘2018’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘For each of the fiscal years 2014 through 2018, not less than 1 percent of the amount authorized to be appropriated under the previous sentence for such fiscal year shall be for carrying out subsection (o).’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 4. REPORTS TO CONGRESS.

Not later than 90 days after the end of each fiscal year for which a grant is made for the purpose described in section 2(a)(6) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, as amended by section 2, the Attorney General shall submit to Congress a report that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) lists the States and units of local government that have been awarded such grants and the amount of the grant received by each such State or unit of local government;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) states the number of extensions granted by the Attorney General under section 2(n)(3) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, as added by section 2; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) summarizes the processing status of the samples of sexual assault evidence about which information has been entered into the Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence Registry established under section 2(o) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Act of 2000, as added by section 3(a), including the number of samples that have not been tested.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 5. REDUCING THE RAPE KIT BACKLOG.

Section 2(c)(3) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 14135(c)(3)) is amended--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘2014’ and inserting ‘2018’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) by adding at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(C) For each of fiscal years 2014 through 2018, not less than 75 percent of the total grant amounts shall be awarded for a combination of purposes under paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (a).’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink