H.R.849 - Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act

To provide for the repeal of the phase out of incandescent light bulbs unless the Comptroller General makes certain specific findings. view all titles (2)

All Bill Titles

  • Short: Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act as introduced.
  • Official: To provide for the repeal of the phase out of incandescent light bulbs unless the Comptroller General makes certain specific findings. as introduced.

This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.

Comments Feed

  • cdowns2 03/09/2011 6:50am

    What a poorly conceived bill. What’s terrible about having to buy efficient light bulbs once every decade? Also, you’ll still be able to buy your precious incandescent bulbs. You’ll just have to buy more efficient and brighter incandescent bulbs. Oh the horror.

  • peterdublin 03/10/2011 8:40am

    Extensive coverage, with documentation and references, that it is wrong to ban simple regular light bulbs,
    on http://ceolas.net :

    The Light Bulb Ban
    (some of the Content Listing:)

    Summary
    Why light bulb regulations are wrong – from every perspective
    Official USA, Canada, EU and Australia links to energy efficiency regulations on lighting

    The Politics behind banning Light Bulbs
    The involvement of manufacturers and other vested interests,
    as seen by official USA and EU documentation and communication

    The Overall Small Energy Savings
    USA Dept of Energy data, less than 1% of society energy usage saved
    Why Power Plants are not saved, regardless of what the ban savings are

    CFL Safety
    Home Safety — Radiation — Health

    The CFL Mercury Issue
    Breakage — Recycling — Dumping — Mining — Manufacturing — Transport — Power Plants

    Light Bulb Policies Compared
    Free Markets or Taxation or Regulation:
    How does one stimulate the manufacture of good – and energy efficient – lighting?

  • JackGreen 03/11/2011 10:55am

    Compared to relic incandescents … Halogen incandescents have virtually identical operating characteristics, are 28% more efficient, contain no mercury, last three times longer, are moderately priced & typically pay for themselves in months. If you don’t want to use a CFL, for whatever reason, use a halogen incandescent.

    Halogens are a direct replacement for the old bulbs. There’s no real “loss of liberty”, here. The argument that 100 million American households need to make a “market” decision on virtually identical products while this nation needs to wake-up and get its act together on energy use and efficiency, and a whole array of issues, is ridiculous.

    Another crazy bill advanced by the crazy lady from MN.

  • sebes3 08/16/2011 1:32pm

    Why does the nanny state have to dictate what light bulbs I can buy. Because the government officials think I am too stupid to evaluate which bulbs are a better deal! You want me to buy your stupid halogens?? or LEDs? or flourecents? Give me the information I need to choose, don’t take away my choice.


Vote on This Bill

57% Users Support Bill

23 in favor / 17 opposed
 

Send Your Rep a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC
Save to Notebook Make A Bill Widget

Top-Rated Comments

OpenCongress is a free and open-source project of the Participatory Politics Foundation, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization with a mission to increase civic engagement. The non-profit Sunlight Foundation is the Founding and Primary Supporter of OpenCongress.