S.158 - Surface Transportation Board Reauthorization Act of 2011

A bill to reauthorize the Surface Transportation Board, and for other purposes. view all titles (2)

All Bill Titles

  • Short: Surface Transportation Board Reauthorization Act of 2011 as introduced.
  • Official: A bill to reauthorize the Surface Transportation Board, and for other purposes. as introduced.

This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.

Bill's Views

  • Today: 3
  • Past Seven Days: 17
  • All-Time: 1,712
 
Introduced
 
Senate
Passes
 
House
Passes
 
President
Signs
 

 
01/24/11
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Official Summary

1/25/2011--Introduced.Surface Transportation Board Reauthorization Act of 2011 - Authorizes appropriations for FY2011-FY2015 for the Surface Transportation Board. Increases Board membership from three to five members. Removes the Board from the Department of Transportation (DOT) to establi

Official Summary

1/25/2011--Introduced.Surface Transportation Board Reauthorization Act of 2011 - Authorizes appropriations for FY2011-FY2015 for the Surface Transportation Board. Increases Board membership from three to five members. Removes the Board from the Department of Transportation (DOT) to establish it as an independent U.S. agency. Grants the DOT Inspector General authority to review only Board financial management, property management, and business operations to determine compliance with applicable federal laws and detect fraud and abuse. Revises member composition of the Railroad-Shipper Transportation Advisory Council. Revises the objectives of U.S. rail transportation policy, including protection of rail shippers. Requires the Board to:
(1) maintain an Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance; and
(2) appoint a rail customer advocate to resolve rail customer complaints. Authorizes the Board to investigate rail carrier and pipeline carrier violations on its own initiative as well as on complaint (as under existing law). Requires proceedings to determine the reasonableness of a rate charged by a carrier be initiated only upon complaint. Requires the Board to:
(1) establish a database of rail service complaints it has received; and
(2) post a quarterly report of such complaints on its website. Authorizes the Board to revoke class exemptions to rail carrier requirements to protect rail shippers from the abuse of market power. Requires Board studies on:
(1) class exemptions;
(2) the Uniform Railroad Costing System;
(3) use of a replacement cost approach to value rail facility assets;
(4) rail practices; and
(5) rail interchange rules. Directs the Board to require Class I railroad carriers and other railroad carriers to report regularly on railroad service metrics and other performance data as prescribed by the Board. Delineates requirements regarding proof and admissibility of evidence of rail carrier interline rate agreements. Prohibits the Board from issuing a person (other than a rail carrier) a certificate to acquire a railroad line or extended or additional railroad line that includes interchange commitments or other mechanisms restricting the ability of the purchaser or tenant to interchange traffic with another carrier unless they are reasonable and in the public interest. Delineates a process for persons to challenge existing interchange commitments as well as certain rights and remedies with respect to them. Directs the Secretary to make grants available to assist any Class III rail carrier under Board jurisdiction with the credit risk premium of a direct loan or loan guarantee made to purchase or lease a rail line. Requires a Class I rail carrier to establish, upon rail customer request, reasonable bottleneck and terminal switching rates for single line movement or interline movement rail transportation over a bottleneck rail segment in which the carrier has market dominance. Revises criteria authorizing the Board to require a rail carrier to make its terminal available to another rail carrier. Authorizes the Board to require a Class I rail carrier (including any other rail carrier deemed appropriate) to make its terminal facilities available for use by another carrier in cases where it has market dominance in a terminal area. Changes from discretionary to mandatory the authority of the Board to establish reasonable rail rate standards for terminal use. Requires the Board to establish a binding arbitration process to resolve rail rate, practice, and common carrier service disputes. Revises maximum rates of relief that the Board may provide to railroad shippers in certain rail rate reasonableness cases. Sets forth time limits for Board review of such cases. Revises requirements with respect to the approval or denial of the consolidation, merger, or acquisition of control of rail carriers to authorize the Board to take into consideration significant effects of the transaction on public health, safety, and the environment as well as intercity rail passenger transportation and commuter rail passenger transportation.

...Read the Rest

FEED

Recent News Coverage

View All (133)  |  View Top Rated

05/26/12
Business Calendar

The Bermuda Run chapter meets at 11:30 a.m. on the first and third Thursdays at Venezia's restaurant, 5273 U.S. 158 in Bermuda Run. The Winston-Salem chapter of the International Association of Administrative Professionals meets on the second ...

Source: Winston-Salem Journal
Add to My Political Notebook Save to Notebook Rate
05/24/12
Re rebounds from life-time lows;back to 55-level with RBI help

This marks a turnaround after rupee''s 158-paise plunge in the last three sessions weighed down by the deterioration in the Balance of Payments (BoP), mainly trade gap amid muted capital inflows in view of the volatile Eurozone situation. Forex dealers ...

Source: MSN India
Add to My Political Notebook Save to Notebook Rate
05/24/12
Rupee rebounds; back to 55-level with RBI help

This marks a turnaround after rupee's 158-paise plunge in the last three sessions weighed down by the deterioration in the Balance of Payments (BoP), mainly trade gap amid muted capital inflows in view of the volatile Eurozone situation.

Source: Daily News and Analysis
Add to My Political Notebook Save to Notebook Rate
FEED

Recent Blog Coverage

View All (96)  |  View Top Rated

02/20/12
Jessica Pacholski 2/21 « Law and Public Policy

“The only possible argument supporting the constitutionality of S. 158, § 1, is that Katzenbach v. Morgan [1996] somehow empowered Congress to restrict the rights of women, or to authorize states to do so, in circumstances ...

Source: jlpach
Add to My Political Notebook Save to Notebook Rate
02/20/12
Jessica Pacholski 2/21 « Law and Public Policy

“The only possible argument supporting the constitutionality of S. 158, § 1, is that Katzenbach v. Morgan [1996] somehow empowered Congress to restrict the rights of women, or to authorize states to do so, in circumstances ...

Source: jlpach
Add to My Political Notebook Save to Notebook Rate
02/20/12
Jessica Pacholski 2/21 « Law and Public Policy

“The only possible argument supporting the constitutionality of S. 158, § 1, is that Katzenbach v. Morgan [1996] somehow empowered Congress to restrict the rights of women, or to authorize states to do so, in circumstances ...

Source: jlpach
Add to My Political Notebook Save to Notebook Rate




Users supporting S.158 (2) are also:

Supporting Bill


Opposing Bill





Vote on This Bill

100% Users Support Bill

2 in favor / 0 opposed
 

Send Your Senator a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC
Save to Notebook Make A Bill Widget

OpenCongress is a free and open-source project of the Participatory Politics Foundation, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization with a mission to increase civic engagement. The non-profit Sunlight Foundation is the Founding and Primary Supporter of OpenCongress.