<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2012-05-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/73345</id>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL - Rag.</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://robportman.on-the-rag.com/2012/05/24/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IV_GT4TcOaOc2AWZrL2sAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHV_H-YTGQvA7MH-QWbkgaSOvFCyg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-05-24:/commentary/15480199</id>
    <updated>2012-05-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A Randslide? Portman Coalition Launch Reduce Unnecessary Spending Senator Rob Portman. Affiliates. [WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, May 24th, 2012 | Comments Off ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://robportman.on-the-rag.com/2012/05/24/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IV_GT4TcOaOc2AWZrL2sAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHV_H-YTGQvA7MH-QWbkgaSOvFCyg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL - Rag.</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://robportman.on-the-rag.com/2012/05/24/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=n7HDT4udO-r4sQLhj7T0CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEOGFg0jnluPEGsLu_BxruYD82Fiw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-05-24:/commentary/15449589</id>
    <updated>2012-05-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A Randslide? Portman Coalition Launch Reduce Unnecessary Spending Senator Rob Portman. Affiliates. [WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, May 24th, 2012 | Comments Off ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://robportman.on-the-rag.com/2012/05/24/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=n7HDT4udO-r4sQLhj7T0CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEOGFg0jnluPEGsLu_BxruYD82Fiw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL - Rag.</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://robportman.on-the-rag.com/2012/05/24/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YQrBT6SODKj2sQK6hdHrCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9RybXtNJujf0mWffetI2mfOn-LA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-05-24:/commentary/15417572</id>
    <updated>2012-05-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A Randslide? Portman Coalition Launch Reduce Unnecessary Spending Senator Rob Portman. Affiliates. [WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, May 24th, 2012 | Comments Off ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://robportman.on-the-rag.com/2012/05/24/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YQrBT6SODKj2sQK6hdHrCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9RybXtNJujf0mWffetI2mfOn-LA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SHOCKING! Exposed Military Internment Resettlement Operations ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://pulsescan.blogspot.com/2012/05/shocking-exposed-military-internment.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=CzqlT5eBEemw2wWkr4ynAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2ypJpRIhU2htkfTu0j6JGSVh15g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-05-03:/commentary/15064987</id>
    <updated>2012-05-03T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Vulcan</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As every day passes, it becomes clearer that our once-free nation is quickly turning down the path of a totalitarian police state, as embodied by the passage of S.1867 in the Senate and H.R.1540 in the House. With the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://pulsescan.blogspot.com/2012/05/shocking-exposed-military-internment.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=CzqlT5eBEemw2wWkr4ynAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2ypJpRIhU2htkfTu0j6JGSVh15g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SHOCKING! Exposed Military Internment Resettlement Operations ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://pulsescan.blogspot.com/2012/05/shocking-exposed-military-internment.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GPKjT7zoKMrqgQfD-4XCCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiH7smnIQj5D8Nd0lBa5ScS8UDpg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-05-03:/commentary/15036841</id>
    <updated>2012-05-03T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Vulcan</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As every day passes, it becomes clearer that our once-free nation is quickly turning down the path of a totalitarian police state, as embodied by the passage of S.1867 in the Senate and H.R.1540 in the House. With the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://pulsescan.blogspot.com/2012/05/shocking-exposed-military-internment.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GPKjT7zoKMrqgQfD-4XCCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiH7smnIQj5D8Nd0lBa5ScS8UDpg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SHOCKING! Exposed Military Internment Resettlement Operations ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://pulsescan.blogspot.com/2012/05/shocking-exposed-military-internment.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BpiiT_D0CuTB2QXZ2fGLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIg7fMu0kACZzqfe5KHFK4ar5JFw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-05-03:/commentary/15008498</id>
    <updated>2012-05-03T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Vulcan</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As every day passes, it becomes clearer that our once-free nation is quickly turning down the path of a totalitarian police state, as embodied by the passage of S.1867 in the Senate and H.R.1540 in the House. With the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://pulsescan.blogspot.com/2012/05/shocking-exposed-military-internment.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BpiiT_D0CuTB2QXZ2fGLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIg7fMu0kACZzqfe5KHFK4ar5JFw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=s9y0T_-bDoyG8QSx75nZDw&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVRFsI4BX73EBgCr_DQkGMA9acnA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15297769</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=s9y0T_-bDoyG8QSx75nZDw&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVRFsI4BX73EBgCr_DQkGMA9acnA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xYq0T_CSLIiq8ASS8qneDw&amp;amp;ved=0CFQQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHG6h70P2nD9_jcAX26K1v94YTzQw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15293340</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xYq0T_CSLIiq8ASS8qneDw&amp;amp;ved=0CFQQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHG6h70P2nD9_jcAX26K1v94YTzQw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7zO0T7TXFY2c8QTZv53NDw&amp;amp;ved=0CFQQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFGcAVcCEn5IGBvacdkJTCkccXNxA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15285014</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7zO0T7TXFY2c8QTZv53NDw&amp;amp;ved=0CFQQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFGcAVcCEn5IGBvacdkJTCkccXNxA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XPmzT7zkBoK88ATN5bjZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFUQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZRQveH4Wpn9uLbzsPWt0X-hJNig" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15280183</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XPmzT7zkBoK88ATN5bjZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFUQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZRQveH4Wpn9uLbzsPWt0X-hJNig&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7YqzT-_lE4ultweozZCjCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFyG32Aw7A9Arp6AsK-cVBccMOtQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15272643</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7YqzT-_lE4ultweozZCjCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFyG32Aw7A9Arp6AsK-cVBccMOtQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xzezT56QC8m8twfHzOWSCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFUQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHtmTildVe0BWABW4EK3r_7nM1jig" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15271313</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xzezT56QC8m8twfHzOWSCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFUQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHtmTildVe0BWABW4EK3r_7nM1jig&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HOKyT8-GFMKztwfCldX4CA&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHVeLXdT0rTvRuIJ7xwsOe32aYmeQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15268717</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HOKyT8-GFMKztwfCldX4CA&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHVeLXdT0rTvRuIJ7xwsOe32aYmeQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SY6yT9iJMojHtgensOSHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2N42icjqtOWd5ZqYT_ifNwDAfYA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15268330</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SY6yT9iJMojHtgensOSHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2N42icjqtOWd5ZqYT_ifNwDAfYA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjmyT5j0OIWs9ATsm8zTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNErZchIPGRBWao5IMNKVoDY0u7gvw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15266957</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjmyT5j0OIWs9ATsm8zTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNErZchIPGRBWao5IMNKVoDY0u7gvw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UOexT4juN4fq9ASay-zuCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhZ1s1QK_RQrz_ZwipgPn4T2VjRQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15262340</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UOexT4juN4fq9ASay-zuCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhZ1s1QK_RQrz_ZwipgPn4T2VjRQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HZGxT4D_LoSG8QT3y9j_CA&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-DlkMgLH_43SKBEuss5VnlYs7ww" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15253307</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HZGxT4D_LoSG8QT3y9j_CA&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-DlkMgLH_43SKBEuss5VnlYs7ww&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=10uxT-PbMYXw2gWhr9DpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElkrA4cIoXlk1ybSQZCyRuUQXSbw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15247344</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=10uxT-PbMYXw2gWhr9DpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElkrA4cIoXlk1ybSQZCyRuUQXSbw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=azyxT_IE6qLaBffQvIEK&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2EMJRVm-NwJqYQ2Nk9Y2kiWFkBw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15245920</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=azyxT_IE6qLaBffQvIEK&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2EMJRVm-NwJqYQ2Nk9Y2kiWFkBw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AeiwT9fXFajm2gXSnbzpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9ZmQSyAf-yRRH0ub2X8oIx_Fjqw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15240239</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AeiwT9fXFajm2gXSnbzpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9ZmQSyAf-yRRH0ub2X8oIx_Fjqw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g5WwT8yIIoLe2AWs95npCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbjnKYW48tqEPawlChFt1EdDlr-w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15239002</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g5WwT8yIIoLe2AWs95npCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbjnKYW48tqEPawlChFt1EdDlr-w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_j6wT-zTDuew2wXYit2xAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQgYybAm_Gz8UaLgWB4b3j7ta8lQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15237370</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_j6wT-zTDuew2wXYit2xAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQgYybAm_Gz8UaLgWB4b3j7ta8lQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tOqvT_CmGcSZ2QXy_KjpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPto_yAhp4K9q5E11gTf3-BgYAIw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15237279</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tOqvT_CmGcSZ2QXy_KjpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPto_yAhp4K9q5E11gTf3-BgYAIw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tpavT8-XCanq2QWEw63pCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFQQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWmUfNbc6dWjwOezi46GEDkuardw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15237137</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tpavT8-XCanq2QWEw63pCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFQQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWmUfNbc6dWjwOezi46GEDkuardw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6UOvT5uaGsfY2QWsvaCVBg&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfTmWXr9ZPF4oKWMeseBXdvs_Czw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15232670</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6UOvT5uaGsfY2QWsvaCVBg&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfTmWXr9ZPF4oKWMeseBXdvs_Czw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ue2uT925Goec2AWhqZDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE7Am0DT0j-AtKtVM5-ZASL5S1PkA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15223256</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ue2uT925Goec2AWhqZDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE7Am0DT0j-AtKtVM5-ZASL5S1PkA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=76euT8CSFImw2QWe9tTpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE51BLS_X458w7z1E3x57oIQfjKeQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15216799</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=76euT8CSFImw2QWe9tTpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE51BLS_X458w7z1E3x57oIQfjKeQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m5muT86UOueY2wXL3p3pCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwXoQUo6YGoJ_7SIKalQcP7c_Iww" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15215328</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m5muT86UOueY2wXL3p3pCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwXoQUo6YGoJ_7SIKalQcP7c_Iww&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JUWuT-mXEYTo2QWfn63pCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHK5to5nAwK3dePOemq4VXH4chCYg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15209239</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JUWuT-mXEYTo2QWfn63pCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHK5to5nAwK3dePOemq4VXH4chCYg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RZytT4vkDpKE8QT679D0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHe27RK1xlBAbVbmM8MILi2IN2BAQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15205335</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RZytT4vkDpKE8QT679D0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHe27RK1xlBAbVbmM8MILi2IN2BAQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Ow2sT9ijGqfA2gXWh9z_BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECAzfDUUGv7Yea8K2raLYnft1o7A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-30:/commentary/15182819</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 30th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/30/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Ow2sT9ijGqfA2gXWh9z_BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECAzfDUUGv7Yea8K2raLYnft1o7A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0J-eT9SfLYHE2wW20-HmDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfMQNEtSHs3mc-sun5LyjnZAWtsQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-24:/commentary/14923954</id>
    <updated>2012-04-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 23rd, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0J-eT9SfLYHE2wW20-HmDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfMQNEtSHs3mc-sun5LyjnZAWtsQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UU2dT7SZEIni2AX6wYDrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEdwrQ2u28W55L8o1321CYHUGZXsA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-24:/commentary/14895680</id>
    <updated>2012-04-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 23rd, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UU2dT7SZEIni2AX6wYDrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEdwrQ2u28W55L8o1321CYHUGZXsA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=whCcT9WHIMTW2gWm_IX9Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGSZ8j80LudzmOnGH0UXDJ_UO8x5g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-24:/commentary/14866816</id>
    <updated>2012-04-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 23rd, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=whCcT9WHIMTW2gWm_IX9Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGSZ8j80LudzmOnGH0UXDJ_UO8x5g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_K6aT7C0KqnE2gWZy7GHDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-0oK4phH3xbj1QLkKVdqs72N4gg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-24:/commentary/14836680</id>
    <updated>2012-04-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 23rd, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_K6aT7C0KqnE2gWZy7GHDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-0oK4phH3xbj1QLkKVdqs72N4gg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=anOZT-LIIIb22gXTtrSWBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH80h2QpUwvdvzFSrtWJLQodfpE0g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-24:/commentary/14806407</id>
    <updated>2012-04-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 23rd, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=anOZT-LIIIb22gXTtrSWBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH80h2QpUwvdvzFSrtWJLQodfpE0g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rg6YT7P-LYeW2QXmrbWdBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEXNQbprJO1ut22gT30pDXGvcSs6g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-24:/commentary/14775005</id>
    <updated>2012-04-24T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 23rd, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rg6YT7P-LYeW2QXmrbWdBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEXNQbprJO1ut22gT30pDXGvcSs6g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BpiiT_D0CuTB2QXZ2fGLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGLIbTg61CYlJVCQHpSg5OSUVytbA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-23:/commentary/15008500</id>
    <updated>2012-04-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 23rd, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BpiiT_D0CuTB2QXZ2fGLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGLIbTg61CYlJVCQHpSg5OSUVytbA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=i_OfT6qnI-qe2AX8_enQAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESk0XPQ7UqI7IHef2HPN1AazoakQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-23:/commentary/14951806</id>
    <updated>2012-04-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 23rd, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=i_OfT6qnI-qe2AX8_enQAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESk0XPQ7UqI7IHef2HPN1AazoakQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=b7OWT5SgE4Wk8ASx48WkDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoJGXiGlFQNoN-k5GkDnt95mevkA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-23:/commentary/14745122</id>
    <updated>2012-04-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Monday, April 23rd, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://johnkerry.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/23/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=b7OWT5SgE4Wk8ASx48WkDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoJGXiGlFQNoN-k5GkDnt95mevkA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 112th Congress -That Sold Out The ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://usapresszorroz.blogspot.com/2012/04/us-senate-roll-call-votes-112th.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9RSUT4u-O-KW2QXv6tmPBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHr0uAUys7cQnoFPPKtzyt5Uhgh1Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-21:/commentary/14688294</id>
    <updated>2012-04-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laurel Maire Sobol</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Question: On the Cloture Motion (Motion to Invoke Cloture on S. 1867 ). Vote Number: 212. Vote Date: November 30 ... Measure Number: S. 1867 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ). Measure Title: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://usapresszorroz.blogspot.com/2012/04/us-senate-roll-call-votes-112th.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9RSUT4u-O-KW2QXv6tmPBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHr0uAUys7cQnoFPPKtzyt5Uhgh1Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Prison Planet.com &#187; Sen. Rand Paul Confronts Obama Crimes</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.prisonplanet.com/sen-ran-paul-confronts-obama-crimes.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U1mRT8vYK8mq2QWeodmCBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwoUo7L28AkWeUbKdqlMIGGcvOkw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-19:/commentary/14631447</id>
    <updated>2012-04-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The 93 (out of 100) Traitors Who Voted FOR S.1867 NDAA Bill &#8212;&#8212; Sen. Lamar Alexander [R, TN] Sen. Kelly Ayotte [R, NH] Sen. John Barrasso [R, WY] Sen. Roy Blunt [R, MO] Sen. John Boozman [R, AR] Sen. Scott Brown [R ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.prisonplanet.com/sen-ran-paul-confronts-obama-crimes.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U1mRT8vYK8mq2QWeodmCBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwoUo7L28AkWeUbKdqlMIGGcvOkw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WoWTemplates presents you with &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Bill Set For ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.wowtemplates.ca/15030/indefinite-detention-bill-set-for-final-vote-thursday-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R5uQT7rnE4ny2QXYrdiBBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhWoZyuTcgBzFD_Gqdjxbk-binHA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-19:/commentary/14616352</id>
    <updated>2012-04-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WebMaster</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, DC 20503 www.miamiherald.com S. 1867 &#8212; National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2012 (Sen. Levin, D-MI) www.govtrack.us S 3081, Indefinite detention, habeas corpus, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.wowtemplates.ca/15030/indefinite-detention-bill-set-for-final-vote-thursday-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R5uQT7rnE4ny2QXYrdiBBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhWoZyuTcgBzFD_Gqdjxbk-binHA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Prison Planet.com &#187; Sen. Rand Paul Confronts Obama Crimes</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.prisonplanet.com/sen-ran-paul-confronts-obama-crimes.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R5uQT7rnE4ny2QXYrdiBBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-2M8bCOnwHMI6U_ptjp9NSI9LlQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-19:/commentary/14616350</id>
    <updated>2012-04-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The 93 (out of 100) Traitors Who Voted FOR S.1867 NDAA Bill &#8212;&#8212; Sen. Lamar Alexander [R, TN] Sen. Kelly Ayotte [R, NH] Sen. John Barrasso [R, WY] Sen. Roy Blunt [R, MO] Sen. John Boozman [R, AR] Sen. Scott Brown [R ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.prisonplanet.com/sen-ran-paul-confronts-obama-crimes.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R5uQT7rnE4ny2QXYrdiBBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-2M8bCOnwHMI6U_ptjp9NSI9LlQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WoWTemplates presents you with &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Bill Set For ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.wowtemplates.ca/15030/indefinite-detention-bill-set-for-final-vote-thursday-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BXGQT_qTHury2QWYzbWVBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxz-HORGlF8yVtI8wLD1_d3VK2jQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-19:/commentary/14611938</id>
    <updated>2012-04-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WebMaster</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, DC 20503 www.miamiherald.com S. 1867 &#8212; National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2012 (Sen. Levin, D-MI) www.govtrack.us S 3081, Indefinite detention, habeas corpus, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.wowtemplates.ca/15030/indefinite-detention-bill-set-for-final-vote-thursday-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BXGQT_qTHury2QWYzbWVBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxz-HORGlF8yVtI8wLD1_d3VK2jQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WoWTemplates presents you with &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Bill Set For ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.wowtemplates.ca/15030/indefinite-detention-bill-set-for-final-vote-thursday-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LEeQT9WIK8He2QXUybiMBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESirNfYwOidY4mBg-A3gE-BNVJEQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-19:/commentary/14607825</id>
    <updated>2012-04-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WebMaster</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, DC 20503 www.miamiherald.com S. 1867 &#8212; National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2012 (Sen. Levin, D-MI) www.govtrack.us S 3081, Indefinite detention, habeas corpus, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.wowtemplates.ca/15030/indefinite-detention-bill-set-for-final-vote-thursday-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LEeQT9WIK8He2QXUybiMBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESirNfYwOidY4mBg-A3gE-BNVJEQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WoWTemplates presents you with &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Bill Set For ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.wowtemplates.ca/15030/indefinite-detention-bill-set-for-final-vote-thursday-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6R2QT5zfDIi02AWn6pT-BA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9mPOeISfbriomE35sq8tMW4vzkg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-19:/commentary/14601628</id>
    <updated>2012-04-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WebMaster</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, DC 20503 www.miamiherald.com S. 1867 &#8212; National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2012 (Sen. Levin, D-MI) www.govtrack.us S 3081, Indefinite detention, habeas corpus, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.wowtemplates.ca/15030/indefinite-detention-bill-set-for-final-vote-thursday-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6R2QT5zfDIi02AWn6pT-BA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9mPOeISfbriomE35sq8tMW4vzkg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WoWTemplates presents you with &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Bill Set For ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.wowtemplates.ca/15030/indefinite-detention-bill-set-for-final-vote-thursday-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=shyQT4niKsKg2gXOxdmXBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEB7pUw5K7JKctnatRXO8LRl0ndVA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-19:/commentary/14601472</id>
    <updated>2012-04-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WebMaster</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, DC 20503 www.miamiherald.com S. 1867 &#8212; National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2012 (Sen. Levin, D-MI) www.govtrack.us S 3081, Indefinite detention, habeas corpus, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.wowtemplates.ca/15030/indefinite-detention-bill-set-for-final-vote-thursday-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=shyQT4niKsKg2gXOxdmXBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEB7pUw5K7JKctnatRXO8LRl0ndVA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WoWTemplates presents you with &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Bill Set For ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.wowtemplates.ca/15030/indefinite-detention-bill-set-for-final-vote-thursday-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6_KPT563GuLM2AXnufyWBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF2Je07gdUNve1D9X4UgOB7tQ1Jfg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-19:/commentary/14597971</id>
    <updated>2012-04-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WebMaster</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, DC 20503 www.miamiherald.com S. 1867 &#8212; National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2012 (Sen. Levin, D-MI) www.govtrack.us S 3081, Indefinite detention, habeas corpus, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.wowtemplates.ca/15030/indefinite-detention-bill-set-for-final-vote-thursday-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6_KPT563GuLM2AXnufyWBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF2Je07gdUNve1D9X4UgOB7tQ1Jfg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Barack Obama Signs NDAA Bill into Law Dec 31st. 2011 &#8211; Ron Paul ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EqKOT8TvIeWi2wWk4-HTCw&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE3CcdHuDi-0bP5K8--MNwPuH4KHg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-17:/commentary/14568792</id>
    <updated>2012-04-17T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
National defence authorization act S. 1867 en.wikipedia.org S 1867 NDAA End of Human Rights Petition www.change.org Stop the Death of the Internet SOPA PIPA Petition bit.ly Martial Law Bill Passes Congress Allows ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EqKOT8TvIeWi2wWk4-HTCw&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE3CcdHuDi-0bP5K8--MNwPuH4KHg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Barack Obama Signs NDAA Bill into Law Dec 31st. 2011 &#8211; Ron Paul ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rXeOT_zDJKPY2gWGocX3Cw&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFMRQpW7c_zjCwdekDaz4z2qkMQg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-17:/commentary/14566445</id>
    <updated>2012-04-17T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
National defence authorization act S. 1867 en.wikipedia.org S 1867 NDAA End of Human Rights Petition www.change.org Stop the Death of the Internet SOPA PIPA Petition bit.ly Martial Law Bill Passes Congress Allows ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rXeOT_zDJKPY2gWGocX3Cw&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFMRQpW7c_zjCwdekDaz4z2qkMQg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Barack Obama Signs NDAA Bill into Law Dec 31st. 2011 &#8211; Ron Paul ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wEyOT5q2GsOg2AWUybSQDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEoidWBMNd7byYmRySUrW0y_s-I_g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-17:/commentary/14563954</id>
    <updated>2012-04-17T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
National defence authorization act S. 1867 en.wikipedia.org S 1867 NDAA End of Human Rights Petition www.change.org Stop the Death of the Internet SOPA PIPA Petition bit.ly Martial Law Bill Passes Congress Allows ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wEyOT5q2GsOg2AWUybSQDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEoidWBMNd7byYmRySUrW0y_s-I_g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Barack Obama Signs NDAA Bill into Law Dec 31st. 2011 &#8211; Ron Paul ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XiKOT_GMIMjK2AXaxYiPDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1BgByT2ccD0g5BkGiCEOK0UEQXw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-16:/commentary/14557331</id>
    <updated>2012-04-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
National defence authorization act S. 1867 en.wikipedia.org S 1867 NDAA End of Human Rights Petition www.change.org Stop the Death of the Internet SOPA PIPA Petition bit.ly Martial Law Bill Passes Congress Allows ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XiKOT_GMIMjK2AXaxYiPDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1BgByT2ccD0g5BkGiCEOK0UEQXw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Barack Obama Signs NDAA Bill into Law Dec 31st. 2011 &#8211; Ron Paul ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TPiNT7vDBKai2QWwuPWsBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHykKqnf1_UaR_nlop4wP0lvmDS-g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-16:/commentary/14553663</id>
    <updated>2012-04-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
National defence authorization act S. 1867 en.wikipedia.org S 1867 NDAA End of Human Rights Petition www.change.org Stop the Death of the Internet SOPA PIPA Petition bit.ly Martial Law Bill Passes Congress Allows ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TPiNT7vDBKai2QWwuPWsBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHykKqnf1_UaR_nlop4wP0lvmDS-g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Barack Obama Signs NDAA Bill into Law Dec 31st. 2011 &#8211; Ron Paul ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=K86NT8WcDaPq2AWPn8SeDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE6OVlFMdDUkOqblawp3wMASsSG-w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-16:/commentary/14550093</id>
    <updated>2012-04-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
National defence authorization act S. 1867 en.wikipedia.org S 1867 NDAA End of Human Rights Petition www.change.org Stop the Death of the Internet SOPA PIPA Petition bit.ly Martial Law Bill Passes Congress Allows ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=K86NT8WcDaPq2AWPn8SeDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE6OVlFMdDUkOqblawp3wMASsSG-w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Barack Obama Signs NDAA Bill into Law Dec 31st. 2011 &#8211; Ron Paul ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=a6SNT-PrCcWv8AG7k-WSBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwfovMQ_A_GVTXgKBqIi7r-8UT1A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-16:/commentary/14543869</id>
    <updated>2012-04-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
National defence authorization act S. 1867 en.wikipedia.org S 1867 NDAA End of Human Rights Petition www.change.org Stop the Death of the Internet SOPA PIPA Petition bit.ly Martial Law Bill Passes Congress Allows ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=a6SNT-PrCcWv8AG7k-WSBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwfovMQ_A_GVTXgKBqIi7r-8UT1A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Barack Obama Signs NDAA Bill into Law Dec 31st. 2011 &#8211; Ron Paul ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=y42NT_GVPOae2gWT9fD2Cw&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFm2MeCyRny9Mq6a8qO4WV7VL8blg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-16:/commentary/14538632</id>
    <updated>2012-04-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
National defence authorization act S. 1867 en.wikipedia.org S 1867 NDAA End of Human Rights Petition www.change.org Stop the Death of the Internet SOPA PIPA Petition bit.ly Martial Law Bill Passes Congress Allows ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=y42NT_GVPOae2gWT9fD2Cw&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFm2MeCyRny9Mq6a8qO4WV7VL8blg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Barack Obama Signs NDAA Bill into Law Dec 31st. 2011 &#8211; Ron Paul ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3HmNT6PmCYOm2gWhiJ2ADA&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECxBbR3Lt9bRWBNhr4K3VQLt4zIQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-16:/commentary/14537064</id>
    <updated>2012-04-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
National defence authorization act S. 1867 en.wikipedia.org S 1867 NDAA End of Human Rights Petition www.change.org Stop the Death of the Internet SOPA PIPA Petition bit.ly Martial Law Bill Passes Congress Allows ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3HmNT6PmCYOm2gWhiJ2ADA&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECxBbR3Lt9bRWBNhr4K3VQLt4zIQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Barack Obama Signs NDAA Bill into Law Dec 31st. 2011 &#8211; Ron Paul ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7FCNT5iiFuPi2QWE_KXpCw&amp;amp;ved=0CC0QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF2hqvuvDLCA-GT9JET2X-F7_jCAw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-16:/commentary/14534927</id>
    <updated>2012-04-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
National defence authorization act S. 1867 en.wikipedia.org S 1867 NDAA End of Human Rights Petition www.change.org Stop the Death of the Internet SOPA PIPA Petition bit.ly Martial Law Bill Passes Congress Allows ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7FCNT5iiFuPi2QWE_KXpCw&amp;amp;ved=0CC0QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF2hqvuvDLCA-GT9JET2X-F7_jCAw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Barack Obama Signs NDAA Bill into Law Dec 31st. 2011 &#8211; Ron Paul ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0iWNT_-cKeec2QXe94GMDA&amp;amp;ved=0CC0QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG5nLGrSOQI1DKo5F-nRizJUbtDeg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-16:/commentary/14532242</id>
    <updated>2012-04-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
National defence authorization act S. 1867 en.wikipedia.org S 1867 NDAA End of Human Rights Petition www.change.org Stop the Death of the Internet SOPA PIPA Petition bit.ly Martial Law Bill Passes Congress Allows ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0iWNT_-cKeec2QXe94GMDA&amp;amp;ved=0CC0QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG5nLGrSOQI1DKo5F-nRizJUbtDeg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Barack Obama Signs NDAA Bill into Law Dec 31st. 2011 &#8211; Ron Paul ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FvuMT8DlEuLM2AXh-pWYDA&amp;amp;ved=0CC0QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYnmtkknLoOmfvbCaGUsqGtnsaYA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-16:/commentary/14529155</id>
    <updated>2012-04-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
National defence authorization act S. 1867 en.wikipedia.org S 1867 NDAA End of Human Rights Petition www.change.org Stop the Death of the Internet SOPA PIPA Petition bit.ly Martial Law Bill Passes Congress Allows ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://icanfixthis.info/barack-obama-signs-ndaa-bill-into-law-dec-31st-2011-ron-paul-explains-the-bill&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FvuMT8DlEuLM2AXh-pWYDA&amp;amp;ved=0CC0QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYnmtkknLoOmfvbCaGUsqGtnsaYA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=23OPT--MOaeL2AWqyu36BA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFItcj9hWodXJ6pY9SM2miF_zQxeg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14585773</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=23OPT--MOaeL2AWqyu36BA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFItcj9hWodXJ6pY9SM2miF_zQxeg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HkqPT9i_G8_62AX1triQDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFMi1hXVhunDYWIvhGV7MAeQhACiQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14582017</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HkqPT9i_G8_62AX1triQDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFMi1hXVhunDYWIvhGV7MAeQhACiQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jR-PT4vHHYqA2gW9i9WFDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDjHXehiOEZ0PXDXRlv17HVQ-IwA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14578189</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jR-PT4vHHYqA2gW9i9WFDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDjHXehiOEZ0PXDXRlv17HVQ-IwA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M_6OT8TrHeq02gXC_dTnCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYJyabv9bjFhJJiMdIYRrUBx33AQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14575093</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M_6OT8TrHeq02gXC_dTnCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYJyabv9bjFhJJiMdIYRrUBx33AQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UvWOT63EB6rq2AXrxLGiDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHc7v1TLsK3OKjP6q_iEZmEhrerig" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14573181</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UvWOT63EB6rq2AXrxLGiDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHc7v1TLsK3OKjP6q_iEZmEhrerig&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=88uOT6izDZLW2wXhkaiRDA&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiu3YitPosJdVnb7t1EmMnwHWktw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14570270</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=88uOT6izDZLW2wXhkaiRDA&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiu3YitPosJdVnb7t1EmMnwHWktw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EqKOT8TvIeWi2wWk4-HTCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESy4pc185fRcYjZJMp1ZCwki3MCw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14568793</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EqKOT8TvIeWi2wWk4-HTCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESy4pc185fRcYjZJMp1ZCwki3MCw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rXeOT_zDJKPY2gWGocX3Cw&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPpiLx6RScCPv2jmC4JLTDgw0jZw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14566446</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rXeOT_zDJKPY2gWGocX3Cw&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPpiLx6RScCPv2jmC4JLTDgw0jZw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wEyOT5q2GsOg2AWUybSQDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEREOOGDm-QXkWCUjc-HXR1pqmsMw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14563955</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wEyOT5q2GsOg2AWUybSQDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEREOOGDm-QXkWCUjc-HXR1pqmsMw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XiKOT_GMIMjK2AXaxYiPDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHOLcKrDuDckyaZaxkPTD4BlYAm1A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14557332</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XiKOT_GMIMjK2AXaxYiPDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHOLcKrDuDckyaZaxkPTD4BlYAm1A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TPiNT7vDBKai2QWwuPWsBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNED2TVEEXRvxIu-NSYbIWBGOmvPew" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14553664</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TPiNT7vDBKai2QWwuPWsBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNED2TVEEXRvxIu-NSYbIWBGOmvPew&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=K86NT8WcDaPq2AWPn8SeDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFD2B-9MgFUjYoa658fFJrvFEoA6g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14550094</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=K86NT8WcDaPq2AWPn8SeDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFD2B-9MgFUjYoa658fFJrvFEoA6g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=a6SNT-PrCcWv8AG7k-WSBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfzN2q5D9qJQ2Qn-dhB-QkbGi_eA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14543876</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=a6SNT-PrCcWv8AG7k-WSBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfzN2q5D9qJQ2Qn-dhB-QkbGi_eA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=y42NT_GVPOae2gWT9fD2Cw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEftsJyKNCQZ36T08mPT4qxe3dp7A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14538635</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=y42NT_GVPOae2gWT9fD2Cw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEftsJyKNCQZ36T08mPT4qxe3dp7A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3HmNT6PmCYOm2gWhiJ2ADA&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqAZSQmTRHf98j1iIdnmtCZqRpGw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14537066</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3HmNT6PmCYOm2gWhiJ2ADA&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqAZSQmTRHf98j1iIdnmtCZqRpGw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7FCNT5iiFuPi2QWE_KXpCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHOahlLTDS7raSmJl0Oawz_3oXpNg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14534932</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7FCNT5iiFuPi2QWE_KXpCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHOahlLTDS7raSmJl0Oawz_3oXpNg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0iWNT_-cKeec2QXe94GMDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFciDxuUiP9l1iX1zIC92pxsw_Yuw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14532244</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0iWNT_-cKeec2QXe94GMDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFciDxuUiP9l1iX1zIC92pxsw_Yuw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FvuMT8DlEuLM2AXh-pWYDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJgDSlm7YhyivGjMNN9gKuhCN2Rg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14529157</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FvuMT8DlEuLM2AXh-pWYDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJgDSlm7YhyivGjMNN9gKuhCN2Rg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IdGMT_7kEorF2QWnreCWDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQwsgHSHrVCbnw46NOZLp1FzmTbQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14519191</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IdGMT_7kEorF2QWnreCWDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQwsgHSHrVCbnw46NOZLp1FzmTbQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sKaMT5X0GOje2QXymI25CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEjdotZ3P4TMx3Ylv1fhWoFi8b8uA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14515656</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sKaMT5X0GOje2QXymI25CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEjdotZ3P4TMx3Ylv1fhWoFi8b8uA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jHyMT9O6E8PQ2AXryojCCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvHlOJVRqz5QH6ikKyFFnZ5Dzjlg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14511863</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jHyMT9O6E8PQ2AXryojCCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvHlOJVRqz5QH6ikKyFFnZ5Dzjlg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rFKMT5j8OKLe2AXTt5jVCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSL_DiBmfKZL0iml1cV4XfFMa-iw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14506142</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rFKMT5j8OKLe2AXTt5jVCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSL_DiBmfKZL0iml1cV4XfFMa-iw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qjiMT9-iN-fg2wXj-9HGCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6fnBc6jnmig7wBuE2vuBOfGIbYw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14499995</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qjiMT9-iN-fg2wXj-9HGCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6fnBc6jnmig7wBuE2vuBOfGIbYw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LiiMT_uUF6Kg2gWsx7zICQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEjFxlxU42yMDq49ieVYdqWmtVI_w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14499056</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LiiMT_uUF6Kg2gWsx7zICQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEjFxlxU42yMDq49ieVYdqWmtVI_w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aQCMT9gWpszYBce9mM4J&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKVn7z8H5d496FINhwlQ32aUdSFA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14496810</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aQCMT9gWpszYBce9mM4J&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKVn7z8H5d496FINhwlQ32aUdSFA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0tWLT-WMF8Go2wXcrt3MCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHLeEGTiPRcYzggWhDZhzp0ui4OCA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14494126</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0tWLT-WMF8Go2wXcrt3MCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHLeEGTiPRcYzggWhDZhzp0ui4OCA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lKmLT96mLKHF2QWBn4nUCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVHoYVTzGm4lfMqjbyBZ-dXKKHfw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14492014</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lKmLT96mLKHF2QWBn4nUCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVHoYVTzGm4lfMqjbyBZ-dXKKHfw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U3-LT8ymHqie2QWq8YXtCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEo8I78F7doH6ggFhf3ICTV4wj1zA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14482661</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U3-LT8ymHqie2QWq8YXtCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEo8I78F7doH6ggFhf3ICTV4wj1zA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HVWLT7q7NorD2QW-l-2eCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1ETzXQOt6Dix4jGXUBjBq5DA3lA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14479022</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HVWLT7q7NorD2QW-l-2eCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1ETzXQOt6Dix4jGXUBjBq5DA3lA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6SqLT-7dFeOC2AWvy9zbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEePZ1V63GlBbxNJNdPHA_SYZuhAw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14475115</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6SqLT-7dFeOC2AWvy9zbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEePZ1V63GlBbxNJNdPHA_SYZuhAw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FAGLT621DefM2gX195CxCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGwPYtTIrVqdevXvtQ0ugu1ixQKbw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14469285</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FAGLT621DefM2gX195CxCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGwPYtTIrVqdevXvtQ0ugu1ixQKbw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ouiKT6GZNcTO2AXAopX_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEawwpbzjdyGtJkIsKBT_CQuLD8kQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14462162</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ouiKT6GZNcTO2AXAopX_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEawwpbzjdyGtJkIsKBT_CQuLD8kQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vtaKT4jhC4Xo2QXzo-DZCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHS8up-g_k6kZKfbRHO1spEil7lKg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14461107</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vtaKT4jhC4Xo2QXzo-DZCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHS8up-g_k6kZKfbRHO1spEil7lKg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eK2KT6-sNqmC2gWduYW-CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRijCHir23TmnpaiA82gC_vPZj-w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14458372</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eK2KT6-sNqmC2gWduYW-CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRijCHir23TmnpaiA82gC_vPZj-w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GYOKT4vaLMji2QXllt21CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEHHi_UhpqlWPPElIg-jUCgI5_gOQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14456179</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GYOKT4vaLMji2QXllt21CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEHHi_UhpqlWPPElIg-jUCgI5_gOQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F1iKT4D8FIKL2AXK973UCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEGcWWt6PEnZ9YzyEWkij8k0JhWmw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14453029</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F1iKT4D8FIKL2AXK973UCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEGcWWt6PEnZ9YzyEWkij8k0JhWmw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zy6KT6eoNaKK2wXvr9HHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFaNcV2Ugip6cZH8o6Bzr2ebYzMA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14443806</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zy6KT6eoNaKK2wXvr9HHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFaNcV2Ugip6cZH8o6Bzr2ebYzMA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tAOKT_TbG6TK2AXzs7jKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNIbUutoGkez1MJWO5GSiV2osrxg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14440369</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tAOKT_TbG6TK2AXzs7jKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNIbUutoGkez1MJWO5GSiV2osrxg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: S.1867 * Senate Wants Martial Law in America</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://markudall.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/12/watch-s-1867-senate-wants-martial-law-in-america/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ABCIT5qsIqec2QWl8aC4CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNFIfyjrRY35iU6Dwpn4BLBu_rug" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14407304</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: S.1867 * Senate Wants Martial Law in America. by admin on Thursday, April 12th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://markudall.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/12/watch-s-1867-senate-wants-martial-law-in-america/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ABCIT5qsIqec2QWl8aC4CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNFIfyjrRY35iU6Dwpn4BLBu_rug&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: S.1867 * Senate Wants Martial Law in America</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://markudall.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/12/watch-s-1867-senate-wants-martial-law-in-america/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0OCHT6myNObK2AXVo_jnCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGlaY0q3hThw0gJ_xREyfoFvpnCHw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14406676</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: S.1867 * Senate Wants Martial Law in America. by admin on Thursday, April 12th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://markudall.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/12/watch-s-1867-senate-wants-martial-law-in-america/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0OCHT6myNObK2AXVo_jnCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGlaY0q3hThw0gJ_xREyfoFvpnCHw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: S.1867 * Senate Wants Martial Law in America</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://markudall.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/12/watch-s-1867-senate-wants-martial-law-in-america/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GLWHT-K_OpKc8gTRiNzvCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZScKElV4kz1--ESM6dubHkatR8w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14402617</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: S.1867 * Senate Wants Martial Law in America. by admin on Thursday, April 12th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://markudall.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/12/watch-s-1867-senate-wants-martial-law-in-america/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GLWHT-K_OpKc8gTRiNzvCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZScKElV4kz1--ESM6dubHkatR8w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: S.1867 * Senate Wants Martial Law in America</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://markudall.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/12/watch-s-1867-senate-wants-martial-law-in-america/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zoqHT9fRN6ew8AHU95mbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFep6u8bS00_l6vc3J8eN6ppqnG-g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14392622</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: S.1867 * Senate Wants Martial Law in America. by admin on Thursday, April 12th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://markudall.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/12/watch-s-1867-senate-wants-martial-law-in-america/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zoqHT9fRN6ew8AHU95mbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFep6u8bS00_l6vc3J8eN6ppqnG-g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: S.1867 * Senate Wants Martial Law in America</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://markudall.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/12/watch-s-1867-senate-wants-martial-law-in-america/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r2CHT6TtOaGL8AHTrcWbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF184KIlLNTh9F8QgkHDU59pRxHmQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-12:/commentary/14389643</id>
    <updated>2012-04-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: S.1867 * Senate Wants Martial Law in America. by admin on Thursday, April 12th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://markudall.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/12/watch-s-1867-senate-wants-martial-law-in-america/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r2CHT6TtOaGL8AHTrcWbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF184KIlLNTh9F8QgkHDU59pRxHmQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_K6aT7C0KqnE2gWZy7GHDw&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHomD2Q4_BDP0XejNrKWsW7XPd4Yw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14836681</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_K6aT7C0KqnE2gWZy7GHDw&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHomD2Q4_BDP0XejNrKWsW7XPd4Yw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=anOZT-LIIIb22gXTtrSWBw&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZgf2GPSwkeUJ2seq2ldtZHm1Qvw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14806408</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=anOZT-LIIIb22gXTtrSWBw&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZgf2GPSwkeUJ2seq2ldtZHm1Qvw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rg6YT7P-LYeW2QXmrbWdBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIAZP85puJmSpe211D3jsMXUyp-g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14775004</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rg6YT7P-LYeW2QXmrbWdBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIAZP85puJmSpe211D3jsMXUyp-g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=b7OWT5SgE4Wk8ASx48WkDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgqwdpdyOuQXrwmL8ADV1w0ixScg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14745121</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=b7OWT5SgE4Wk8ASx48WkDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgqwdpdyOuQXrwmL8ADV1w0ixScg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WGmVT_blGcHa2AWairmcBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHkxv5cRsiMVe1SAwJwoR0VHrC9IA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14716352</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WGmVT_blGcHa2AWairmcBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHkxv5cRsiMVe1SAwJwoR0VHrC9IA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9RSUT4u-O-KW2QXv6tmPBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGm5oxymWYCS4mj71vty6Jp6Emj-g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14688296</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9RSUT4u-O-KW2QXv6tmPBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGm5oxymWYCS4mj71vty6Jp6Emj-g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sbyST-rOGcjO2AX199CUBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEY07VhEf_RXzUVyfQCq_qlSzqorQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14660312</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sbyST-rOGcjO2AX199CUBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEY07VhEf_RXzUVyfQCq_qlSzqorQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BXGQT_qTHury2QWYzbWVBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEm2CN0NAgPktEbEJcRnsatX-A2_Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14611940</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BXGQT_qTHury2QWYzbWVBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEm2CN0NAgPktEbEJcRnsatX-A2_Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LEeQT9WIK8He2QXUybiMBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHwPP4uqDZOXxFbu5mBbl4GPsgOKA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14607827</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LEeQT9WIK8He2QXUybiMBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHwPP4uqDZOXxFbu5mBbl4GPsgOKA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6R2QT5zfDIi02AWn6pT-BA&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEHszSQiC5ESlChUaOwlVAfC-WD2A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14601630</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6R2QT5zfDIi02AWn6pT-BA&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEHszSQiC5ESlChUaOwlVAfC-WD2A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=shyQT4niKsKg2gXOxdmXBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGgSX2bFiUsQrWZrrMopilmyfiHpw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14601475</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=shyQT4niKsKg2gXOxdmXBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGgSX2bFiUsQrWZrrMopilmyfiHpw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6_KPT563GuLM2AXnufyWBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBf-_X2CafOmc0a3PoVNvpjmWWUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14597973</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6_KPT563GuLM2AXnufyWBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBf-_X2CafOmc0a3PoVNvpjmWWUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RsmPT5XHI-bK2AXepYWcBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0JGnyVsZuEyYh53epVK-aCz67tw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14595451</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RsmPT5XHI-bK2AXepYWcBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0JGnyVsZuEyYh53epVK-aCz67tw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=G56PT67xN8mC2wWC0sDnBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHnL8Z9dxJLGKupBM-rWfXQsBXAKQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14592725</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=G56PT67xN8mC2wWC0sDnBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHnL8Z9dxJLGKupBM-rWfXQsBXAKQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Av-GT9SnO8G18AHp-NG6CA&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHDF8iF2N-LHXM0jhqLFo4n-RT1vw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14377031</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Av-GT9SnO8G18AHp-NG6CA&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHDF8iF2N-LHXM0jhqLFo4n-RT1vw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MeKGT5_OJYaS8AG5sf2VCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJiCI-UjU3_N6x_3Ysz-wuZvUc6g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14373787</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MeKGT5_OJYaS8AG5sf2VCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJiCI-UjU3_N6x_3Ysz-wuZvUc6g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tLiGT-7LAuW-8AHApPXCCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEri_LNz9eUHocgmCiQWqiFX7XRRw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14371465</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tLiGT-7LAuW-8AHApPXCCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEri_LNz9eUHocgmCiQWqiFX7XRRw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fI-GT-CMBKeG8AHoz92TCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEt2cbbvps-zKdvma4PHBf_QWT9RQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14369362</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fI-GT-CMBKeG8AHoz92TCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEt2cbbvps-zKdvma4PHBf_QWT9RQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nWOGT7-IHoGG8AGRxLi3CA&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHcaVfba2R0WNiaanF_s9OjLoErWg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-04-11:/commentary/14367102</id>
    <updated>2012-04-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/04/11/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nWOGT7-IHoGG8AGRxLi3CA&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHcaVfba2R0WNiaanF_s9OjLoErWg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 112th Congress - 1st Session 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://usapresszorroz.blogspot.com/2012/03/us-senate-roll-call-votes-112th.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IZd0T-6VEMX02QWD_uniDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEordvR3fzua5FO83HwaQvYi6dhmA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-03-29:/commentary/13902124</id>
    <updated>2012-03-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laurel Maire Sobol</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Question: On the Cloture Motion (Motion to Invoke Cloture on S. 1867 ). Vote Number: 212, Vote Date: ... Measure Number: S. 1867 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ). Measure Title: An original bill to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://usapresszorroz.blogspot.com/2012/03/us-senate-roll-call-votes-112th.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IZd0T-6VEMX02QWD_uniDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEordvR3fzua5FO83HwaQvYi6dhmA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 112th Congress - 1st Session 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://usapresszorroz.blogspot.com/2012/03/us-senate-roll-call-votes-112th.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=22x0T_GeD8qW2AWA-qXwDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGoVTJNeS0L4ft-U3J-ux-9zs5iBA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-03-29:/commentary/13892044</id>
    <updated>2012-03-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laurel Maire Sobol</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Question: On the Cloture Motion (Motion to Invoke Cloture on S. 1867 ). Vote Number: 212, Vote Date: ... Measure Number: S. 1867 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ). Measure Title: An original bill to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://usapresszorroz.blogspot.com/2012/03/us-senate-roll-call-votes-112th.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=22x0T_GeD8qW2AWA-qXwDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGoVTJNeS0L4ft-U3J-ux-9zs5iBA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 112th Congress - 1st Session 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://usapresszorroz.blogspot.com/2012/03/us-senate-roll-call-votes-112th.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U2J0T8_iKcaA2wXa9LTUDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGSRtd523e25kpfZHY8vCZRGQrMsQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-03-29:/commentary/13890953</id>
    <updated>2012-03-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laurel Maire Sobol</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Question: On the Cloture Motion (Motion to Invoke Cloture on S. 1867 ). Vote Number: 212, Vote Date: ... Measure Number: S. 1867 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ). Measure Title: An original bill to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://usapresszorroz.blogspot.com/2012/03/us-senate-roll-call-votes-112th.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U2J0T8_iKcaA2wXa9LTUDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGSRtd523e25kpfZHY8vCZRGQrMsQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 112th Congress - 1st Session 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://usapresszorroz.blogspot.com/2012/03/us-senate-roll-call-votes-112th.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YkV0T-fxL6qA2gWU_pnFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHWB1JpEUb3KvtokcrRTyM5Z0sAoQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-03-29:/commentary/13888324</id>
    <updated>2012-03-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laurel Maire Sobol</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Question: On the Cloture Motion (Motion to Invoke Cloture on S. 1867 ). Vote Number: 212, Vote Date: ... Measure Number: S. 1867 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ). Measure Title: An original bill to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://usapresszorroz.blogspot.com/2012/03/us-senate-roll-call-votes-112th.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YkV0T-fxL6qA2gWU_pnFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHWB1JpEUb3KvtokcrRTyM5Z0sAoQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 112th Congress - 1st Session 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://usapresszorroz.blogspot.com/2012/03/us-senate-roll-call-votes-112th.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sRh0T8rBBKTO2AWj_sTcDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEeJSgPediomwfeJww6z1O1Gx0pMQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-03-29:/commentary/13885313</id>
    <updated>2012-03-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laurel Maire Sobol</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Question: On the Cloture Motion (Motion to Invoke Cloture on S. 1867 ). Vote Number: 212, Vote Date: ... Measure Number: S. 1867 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ). Measure Title: An original bill to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://usapresszorroz.blogspot.com/2012/03/us-senate-roll-call-votes-112th.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sRh0T8rBBKTO2AWj_sTcDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEeJSgPediomwfeJww6z1O1Gx0pMQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sen. Hatch and the case against the 17th Amendment | | St. George ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.stgeorgeutah.com/news/archive/2012/03/19/sen-hatch-and-the-case-against-the-17th-amendment/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-ZnT7KjCsiJsQKnwoyuCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF3ZDYFZF8Kf3qsu_05jW8K2Trrlw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-03-19:/commentary/13518017</id>
    <updated>2012-03-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bryan Hyde</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Under the guise of funding U.S. military operations worldwide, S. 1867 also contained language allowing the Executive branch to indefinitely detain any person, anywhere in the world, without due process or trial. This is in ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.stgeorgeutah.com/news/archive/2012/03/19/sen-hatch-and-the-case-against-the-17th-amendment/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-ZnT7KjCsiJsQKnwoyuCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF3ZDYFZF8Kf3qsu_05jW8K2Trrlw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sen. Hatch and the case against the 17th Amendment | | St. George ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.stgeorgeutah.com/news/archive/2012/03/19/sen-hatch-and-the-case-against-the-17th-amendment/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gbxnT5DfCKT_sQL0xcGcCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8fuROjKyCGJdLpceMAnmCZt1mQQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-03-19:/commentary/13513749</id>
    <updated>2012-03-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bryan Hyde</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Under the guise of funding U.S. military operations worldwide, S. 1867 also contained language allowing the Executive branch to indefinitely detain any person, anywhere in the world, without due process or trial. This is in ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.stgeorgeutah.com/news/archive/2012/03/19/sen-hatch-and-the-case-against-the-17th-amendment/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gbxnT5DfCKT_sQL0xcGcCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8fuROjKyCGJdLpceMAnmCZt1mQQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sen. Hatch and the case against the 17th Amendment | | St. George ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.stgeorgeutah.com/news/archive/2012/03/19/sen-hatch-and-the-case-against-the-17th-amendment/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UpJnT9HFIIyqsALIy4mLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHCJW30OYXQathbsgxtp93IZvVzYw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-03-19:/commentary/13509285</id>
    <updated>2012-03-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bryan Hyde</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Under the guise of funding U.S. military operations worldwide, S. 1867 also contained language allowing the Executive branch to indefinitely detain any person, anywhere in the world, without due process or trial. This is in ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.stgeorgeutah.com/news/archive/2012/03/19/sen-hatch-and-the-case-against-the-17th-amendment/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UpJnT9HFIIyqsALIy4mLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHCJW30OYXQathbsgxtp93IZvVzYw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Session 2011-12-01 (13:42:12-14:44:07) - Atlanta Jobs</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://hiringinatlanta.com/senate-session-2011-12-01-134212-144407&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=68pQT7e0B4qGsALyxaC4Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxfgX4hVvdh769sbdvHr5NNTtV5Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-03-02:/commentary/12831756</id>
    <updated>2012-03-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Atlanta</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senate Session 2011-12-01 (13:42:12-14: Th&#1077; Senate convened &#1072;nd b&#1077;g&#1072;n w&#1110;th a period &#959;f morning business. Thereafter, members resumed consideration &#959;f S.1867, th&#1077; National Defense Authorization Act. Video Rating: 0 / ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://hiringinatlanta.com/senate-session-2011-12-01-134212-144407&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=68pQT7e0B4qGsALyxaC4Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxfgX4hVvdh769sbdvHr5NNTtV5Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Real Constitutional Law Professor&amp;#39;s Take On The NDAA &#171; Joe Miller</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://joemiller.us/2012/02/a-real-constitutional-law-professors-take-on-the-ndaa/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=15ZNT4DZFIWKsALD1uwb&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHxLN2hupilKYhfGd0Hkv94fO_vw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-02-28:/commentary/12736122</id>
    <updated>2012-02-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Michael Connelly</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
However, in the U. S. Senate version of the legislation, S.1867, there are sections dealing with the detaining of people suspected of being involved with terrorist organizations or any groups engaging in, or planning, hostile ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://joemiller.us/2012/02/a-real-constitutional-law-professors-take-on-the-ndaa/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=15ZNT4DZFIWKsALD1uwb&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHxLN2hupilKYhfGd0Hkv94fO_vw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Real Constitutional Law Professor&amp;#39;s Take On The NDAA &#171; Joe Miller</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://joemiller.us/2012/02/a-real-constitutional-law-professors-take-on-the-ndaa/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sWxNT-6UFa6DsAKRltgR&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1Xyj6p9EC9W48flgo3sMEIBBQ2w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-02-28:/commentary/12733159</id>
    <updated>2012-02-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Michael Connelly</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
However, in the U. S. Senate version of the legislation, S.1867, there are sections dealing with the detaining of people suspected of being involved with terrorist organizations or any groups engaging in, or planning, hostile ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://joemiller.us/2012/02/a-real-constitutional-law-professors-take-on-the-ndaa/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sWxNT-6UFa6DsAKRltgR&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1Xyj6p9EC9W48flgo3sMEIBBQ2w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Virginia House Nullifies Deadbeat Senator McCain&amp;#39;s ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/02/22/virginia-house-nullifies-deadbeat-senator-mccains-unconstitutional-ndaa-indefinite-detention-provision/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lAVFT6qEJ8SusQLN1YTDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKu2_sl9We3QfYOcJT9kL1sh_1xw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-02-21:/commentary/12479287</id>
    <updated>2012-02-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Volubrjotr</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.A. 1126 would have amended Section 1031 of S. 1867 to clearly state that the authority to detain individuals does not confer any authority of the military to detain American citizens without trial until the end of hostilities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/02/22/virginia-house-nullifies-deadbeat-senator-mccains-unconstitutional-ndaa-indefinite-detention-provision/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lAVFT6qEJ8SusQLN1YTDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKu2_sl9We3QfYOcJT9kL1sh_1xw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Virginia House Nullifies Deadbeat Senator McCain&amp;#39;s ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/02/22/virginia-house-nullifies-deadbeat-senator-mccains-unconstitutional-ndaa-indefinite-detention-provision/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ueJET_aOJ8X0sQLKn8zCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFj6yR9j2K4yavTl5RSQ8kd15ACNw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-02-21:/commentary/12474775</id>
    <updated>2012-02-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Volubrjotr</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.A. 1126 would have amended Section 1031 of S. 1867 to clearly state that the authority to detain individuals does not confer any authority of the military to detain American citizens without trial until the end of hostilities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/02/22/virginia-house-nullifies-deadbeat-senator-mccains-unconstitutional-ndaa-indefinite-detention-provision/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ueJET_aOJ8X0sQLKn8zCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFj6yR9j2K4yavTl5RSQ8kd15ACNw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Virginia House Nullifies Deadbeat Senator McCain&amp;#39;s ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/02/22/virginia-house-nullifies-deadbeat-senator-mccains-unconstitutional-ndaa-indefinite-detention-provision/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tNpET4jiGIuGsgKUtZzDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1JUvmc8B-A7-MBj6HXQebZXUt_g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-02-21:/commentary/12473726</id>
    <updated>2012-02-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Volubrjotr</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.A. 1126 would have amended Section 1031 of S. 1867 to clearly state that the authority to detain individuals does not confer any authority of the military to detain American citizens without trial until the end of hostilities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/02/22/virginia-house-nullifies-deadbeat-senator-mccains-unconstitutional-ndaa-indefinite-detention-provision/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tNpET4jiGIuGsgKUtZzDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1JUvmc8B-A7-MBj6HXQebZXUt_g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Virginia House Nullifies Deadbeat Senator McCain&amp;#39;s ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/02/22/virginia-house-nullifies-deadbeat-senator-mccains-unconstitutional-ndaa-indefinite-detention-provision/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6LBET_mqIejlsQKnts3CDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHD7vkj95xIUNFHmjrmGX1A4yjTJg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-02-21:/commentary/12470052</id>
    <updated>2012-02-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Volubrjotr</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.A. 1126 would have amended Section 1031 of S. 1867 to clearly state that the authority to detain individuals does not confer any authority of the military to detain American citizens without trial until the end of hostilities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/02/22/virginia-house-nullifies-deadbeat-senator-mccains-unconstitutional-ndaa-indefinite-detention-provision/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6LBET_mqIejlsQKnts3CDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHD7vkj95xIUNFHmjrmGX1A4yjTJg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Virginia House Nullifies Deadbeat Senator McCain&amp;#39;s ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/02/22/virginia-house-nullifies-deadbeat-senator-mccains-unconstitutional-ndaa-indefinite-detention-provision/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QIZET5PBGuHksQLx6IHDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFW6vDBZvkHPUhfCQJR-G1zqzK5g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-02-21:/commentary/12468815</id>
    <updated>2012-02-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Volubrjotr</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.A. 1126 would have amended Section 1031 of S. 1867 to clearly state that the authority to detain individuals does not confer any authority of the military to detain American citizens without trial until the end of hostilities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/02/22/virginia-house-nullifies-deadbeat-senator-mccains-unconstitutional-ndaa-indefinite-detention-provision/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QIZET5PBGuHksQLx6IHDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFW6vDBZvkHPUhfCQJR-G1zqzK5g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Former Member Of The Russian Joint Chiefs Of Staff: Russia Is ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.irishtimez.com/2012/02/former-member-of-the-russian-joint-chiefs-of-staff-russia-is-ready-to-defend-iran-and-syria/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A70xT_q7LOmIsgKlhIjnBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFh4JzsZPhfEnFXG6WO002OmYr63g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-02-07:/commentary/12082799</id>
    <updated>2012-02-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>joetaxpayer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The New American: US Senate Traitors Pass &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Bill S.1867, Create A Military Police State &#8211; Senator Rand Paul&amp;#39;s Adress To The American People (Video). - Business Insider: The Media&amp;#39;s Blackout Of The ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.irishtimez.com/2012/02/former-member-of-the-russian-joint-chiefs-of-staff-russia-is-ready-to-defend-iran-and-syria/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A70xT_q7LOmIsgKlhIjnBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFh4JzsZPhfEnFXG6WO002OmYr63g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Former Member Of The Russian Joint Chiefs Of Staff: Russia Is ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.irishtimez.com/2012/02/former-member-of-the-russian-joint-chiefs-of-staff-russia-is-ready-to-defend-iran-and-syria/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4ZIxT-_5GZKNsAKT3a2cBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFSbwj1M65ylRDET59EP46-CUibjQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-02-07:/commentary/12082581</id>
    <updated>2012-02-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>joetaxpayer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The New American: US Senate Traitors Pass &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Bill S.1867, Create A Military Police State &#8211; Senator Rand Paul&amp;#39;s Adress To The American People (Video). - Business Insider: The Media&amp;#39;s Blackout Of The ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.irishtimez.com/2012/02/former-member-of-the-russian-joint-chiefs-of-staff-russia-is-ready-to-defend-iran-and-syria/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4ZIxT-_5GZKNsAKT3a2cBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFSbwj1M65ylRDET59EP46-CUibjQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>reading. writing. revolution: response from Senator Barbara Mikulski ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.readingwritingrevolution.net/2012/01/response-from-senator-barbara-mikulski.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=y9YoT_ysMfKGsgLFmsSlAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGRVScdklcXPCc1QdbHHBVda0kmLg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-31:/commentary/11936886</id>
    <updated>2012-01-31T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>reading. writing. revolution.</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I support S. 1867 because it is a bill that looks out for the needs of our service men and women while also looking out for their families. It puts our service members and their families first, provides our troops with what they ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.readingwritingrevolution.net/2012/01/response-from-senator-barbara-mikulski.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=y9YoT_ysMfKGsgLFmsSlAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGRVScdklcXPCc1QdbHHBVda0kmLg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>reading. writing. revolution: response from Senator Barbara Mikulski ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.readingwritingrevolution.net/2012/01/response-from-senator-barbara-mikulski.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oqwoT_mXD9K62gWXwMzDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFsV9JKbfyQd5xVNI28JdphJ72r_A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-31:/commentary/11932891</id>
    <updated>2012-01-31T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>reading. writing. revolution.</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I support S. 1867 because it is a bill that looks out for the needs of our service men and women while also looking out for their families. It puts our service members and their families first, provides our troops with what they ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.readingwritingrevolution.net/2012/01/response-from-senator-barbara-mikulski.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oqwoT_mXD9K62gWXwMzDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFsV9JKbfyQd5xVNI28JdphJ72r_A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>reading. writing. revolution: response from Senator Barbara Mikulski ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.readingwritingrevolution.net/2012/01/response-from-senator-barbara-mikulski.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=boIoT7mnHMm_2QXy6um4Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzI3CXG_N_0IAXoftAFma47uea5A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-31:/commentary/11932745</id>
    <updated>2012-01-31T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>reading. writing. revolution.</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I support S. 1867 because it is a bill that looks out for the needs of our service men and women while also looking out for their families. It puts our service members and their families first, provides our troops with what they ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.readingwritingrevolution.net/2012/01/response-from-senator-barbara-mikulski.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=boIoT7mnHMm_2QXy6um4Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzI3CXG_N_0IAXoftAFma47uea5A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m9knT5zJLojo2gXjzaG5Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEM6cF4eUvbAqibmuKP_2C5yi9C8Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-26:/commentary/11905306</id>
    <updated>2012-01-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m9knT5zJLojo2gXjzaG5Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEM6cF4eUvbAqibmuKP_2C5yi9C8Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aMgnT-X9N8uKsAKynY3jAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHk0PjT1dE8N0FZRBKO0k0R4FMmsQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-26:/commentary/11902551</id>
    <updated>2012-01-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aMgnT-X9N8uKsAKynY3jAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHk0PjT1dE8N0FZRBKO0k0R4FMmsQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Wq8nT4GpOY382gWf5Z3fAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNjo0VSJXpt-3G946zKvP61AasHg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-26:/commentary/11899383</id>
    <updated>2012-01-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Wq8nT4GpOY382gWf5Z3fAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNjo0VSJXpt-3G946zKvP61AasHg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JIgmT_XmEKrJsQLj_aiMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8SPH2znLCYpJXL3W1TaG-rXKKWQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-26:/commentary/11882877</id>
    <updated>2012-01-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JIgmT_XmEKrJsQLj_aiMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8SPH2znLCYpJXL3W1TaG-rXKKWQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BHYmT4PGDJSosAL5zKyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhnmjqSc4OOraEbnXMGM5MPsJJFQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-26:/commentary/11879958</id>
    <updated>2012-01-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BHYmT4PGDJSosAL5zKyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhnmjqSc4OOraEbnXMGM5MPsJJFQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1V0mT-H_G-XLsQK9n9yMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEof4wfeGv-h5OVFmk8ey4dSybdww" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-26:/commentary/11876810</id>
    <updated>2012-01-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1V0mT-H_G-XLsQK9n9yMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEof4wfeGv-h5OVFmk8ey4dSybdww&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzMmT5PhLu2gsQKG-PGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHdcK-D7OaZWmGm1JdypmJMA2LSjw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-26:/commentary/11874977</id>
    <updated>2012-01-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzMmT5PhLu2gsQKG-PGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHdcK-D7OaZWmGm1JdypmJMA2LSjw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzYlT8H5DIqvsALLq9GMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF3FEwQ1Ry-2A2rpKtYxZE1E3dmSw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-26:/commentary/11844330</id>
    <updated>2012-01-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzYlT8H5DIqvsALLq9GMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF3FEwQ1Ry-2A2rpKtYxZE1E3dmSw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZiUlT_2KN-rCsQLXse2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9ekFPoWK0JszsEjYrAHAsAc89ng" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-26:/commentary/11841767</id>
    <updated>2012-01-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZiUlT_2KN-rCsQLXse2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9ekFPoWK0JszsEjYrAHAsAc89ng&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WgwlT97EO4OxsALrz4mNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGFU68RddYiRkXoonDwY9LCbqh-Ug" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-26:/commentary/11838639</id>
    <updated>2012-01-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WgwlT97EO4OxsALrz4mNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGFU68RddYiRkXoonDwY9LCbqh-Ug&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuIkT6-6C4yqsALiq5CNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHyoRAsICnQUP1xlLeBDc93F2Yz0Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-26:/commentary/11836755</id>
    <updated>2012-01-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuIkT6-6C4yqsALiq5CNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHyoRAsICnQUP1xlLeBDc93F2Yz0Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P-UjT_WYK-mxsAKzoa2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsYG1liUf4vxqoKp_NyJArFyd7Ng" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-26:/commentary/11805714</id>
    <updated>2012-01-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P-UjT_WYK-mxsAKzoa2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsYG1liUf4vxqoKp_NyJArFyd7Ng&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WdQjT7XWCeSmsQKDtamMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEoiCIkkJzmUcfAHQqC_7DmLFpJ9Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-26:/commentary/11803385</id>
    <updated>2012-01-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WdQjT7XWCeSmsQKDtamMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEoiCIkkJzmUcfAHQqC_7DmLFpJ9Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3rojT9vTK8Loggf0_MHTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGihUelUFWHGA9zx7WYGKn100rs3w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-26:/commentary/11800245</id>
    <updated>2012-01-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3rojT9vTK8Loggf0_MHTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGihUelUFWHGA9zx7WYGKn100rs3w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xZAjT4HkCYT-ggeoi7nhCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGEl7O4XYgcq1pIp0ZwT8XjPLe62A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-26:/commentary/11798992</id>
    <updated>2012-01-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xZAjT4HkCYT-ggeoi7nhCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGEl7O4XYgcq1pIp0ZwT8XjPLe62A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_y0oT7eWFIrCsQKVkfW_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHnFD7i3NzyqgMqi2uNZ6pq08vsow" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11923130</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_y0oT7eWFIrCsQKVkfW_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHnFD7i3NzyqgMqi2uNZ6pq08vsow&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3AMoT4F4pKDYBZOPybcC&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFxRZZz5VrQ-YjOD2td5ll1H2nW-w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11910539</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3AMoT4F4pKDYBZOPybcC&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFxRZZz5VrQ-YjOD2td5ll1H2nW-w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-FonT6WoGMma2gX6zsTCAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzIMDt6MlkKlL8Pz30mepzotSmJQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11892998</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-FonT6WoGMma2gX6zsTCAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzIMDt6MlkKlL8Pz30mepzotSmJQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xTAnT4iUBeT02wWq3ey_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHIv9PTbdHFJP4x6Y5X8LnXxycXtw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11892872</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xTAnT4iUBeT02wWq3ey_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHIv9PTbdHFJP4x6Y5X8LnXxycXtw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lQYnT5vhMOf4sQK_gt2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKfULmJOaS0-YZJVD0fquER0-nLw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11892745</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lQYnT5vhMOf4sQK_gt2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKfULmJOaS0-YZJVD0fquER0-nLw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9wmT-XwEuSusAKRs72NAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfiGxb27mf9LYa1y1ybSS5bhf3cA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11890998</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9wmT-XwEuSusAKRs72NAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfiGxb27mf9LYa1y1ybSS5bhf3cA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ULImT5n7FaiLsgL-mcmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHxHnl0p7I77fylAS4MoqjSVAeyJw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11888257</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ULImT5n7FaiLsgL-mcmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHxHnl0p7I77fylAS4MoqjSVAeyJw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eQkmT4OPGYavsALR5KWMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFHX1-dxG_ApPkbfkyJDUGlllFQ2g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11871723</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eQkmT4OPGYavsALR5KWMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFHX1-dxG_ApPkbfkyJDUGlllFQ2g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=at8lT9_3CcO3sQKW-cCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEe4nDOZuCtov4hfHVF8a7RMPDL1g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11871593</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=at8lT9_3CcO3sQKW-cCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEe4nDOZuCtov4hfHVF8a7RMPDL1g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MbUlT6XhDMmHsAKntqCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGC7MK-8rBsE7QR0F62SycKtyKbsQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11869253</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MbUlT6XhDMmHsAKntqCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGC7MK-8rBsE7QR0F62SycKtyKbsQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DIslT4u1K-GtsQLvqKCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNZjaRP8e68keKyghd6bqj8D22Sw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11862157</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DIslT4u1K-GtsQLvqKCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNZjaRP8e68keKyghd6bqj8D22Sw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WAlT8bkDsuKsAKn8OmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHFb8r7XWsIu1Aq8Zdea0u5xT9dHw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11849832</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WAlT8bkDsuKsAKn8OmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHFb8r7XWsIu1Aq8Zdea0u5xT9dHw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F7gkT_PHE4-CsgL25M2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE41i1y5IbivfGRXPRpvMIsK7Zrsg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11833269</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F7gkT_PHE4-CsgL25M2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE41i1y5IbivfGRXPRpvMIsK7Zrsg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Y0kT7jiGauksQLywOyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHUmZddvcf_EJF6KwrqpDzLHu33zw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11833132</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Y0kT7jiGauksQLywOyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHUmZddvcf_EJF6KwrqpDzLHu33zw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vmMkT6SaGe2AsgLFkLmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEXrvab-EJ_Unu0wIvwMrQEc1HBNA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11829869</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vmMkT6SaGe2AsgLFkLmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEXrvab-EJ_Unu0wIvwMrQEc1HBNA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hjkkT6eTEImJsALS7fGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEau3IHYe4l6-6EuJ-0jCRXwzIFCw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11822973</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hjkkT6eTEImJsALS7fGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEau3IHYe4l6-6EuJ-0jCRXwzIFCw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Xw8kT_yYA6LksQLtkaSMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHYswPWSUoSWe7Fs6KjixednYiBXg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11810665</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Xw8kT_yYA6LksQLtkaSMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHYswPWSUoSWe7Fs6KjixednYiBXg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m2YjT_GdKMT2ggeokLT7CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFr-Y4Y7A8-jnDrn_nxBEgBZcdy_w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11795244</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m2YjT_GdKMT2ggeokLT7CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFr-Y4Y7A8-jnDrn_nxBEgBZcdy_w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cTwjT9vTLsX7ggeD5v3bCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLPP0iQPQp4tRqa_LOTpkysVRMnQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-25:/commentary/11795113</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. by admin on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/25/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed-s-1867-ndaa-late-on-121-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cTwjT9vTLsX7ggeD5v3bCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLPP0iQPQp4tRqa_LOTpkysVRMnQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LUIhT_ihB7KnsAK2yqG4CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH3xwcGerrEEdlVCEicMfe84M6_oQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-20:/commentary/11728781</id>
    <updated>2012-01-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LUIhT_ihB7KnsAK2yqG4CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH3xwcGerrEEdlVCEicMfe84M6_oQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9TEhT9WgO--GsAKk9LCxCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1rLZmnqvDh6z3pqdTO0aZPyPeHw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-20:/commentary/11726534</id>
    <updated>2012-01-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9TEhT9WgO--GsAKk9LCxCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1rLZmnqvDh6z3pqdTO0aZPyPeHw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9TEhT9WgO--GsAKk9LCxCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJhFk14FeWgLTp6KCnpbxc5-WeVQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-20:/commentary/11726533</id>
    <updated>2012-01-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9TEhT9WgO--GsAKk9LCxCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJhFk14FeWgLTp6KCnpbxc5-WeVQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xchT4jJCuissQLS48C1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5IAChZkqPaW-hrH7BVFwD1mwd9Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-20:/commentary/11723541</id>
    <updated>2012-01-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xchT4jJCuissQLS48C1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5IAChZkqPaW-hrH7BVFwD1mwd9Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xchT4jJCuissQLS48C1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_g8nH2S5kYQaSYE426eb-2q80rg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-20:/commentary/11723540</id>
    <updated>2012-01-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xchT4jJCuissQLS48C1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_g8nH2S5kYQaSYE426eb-2q80rg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-0gT920Ieb6sQLAysTDCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfASzLWOkG1IUUECOU-H2pVp4eVA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-20:/commentary/11722182</id>
    <updated>2012-01-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-0gT920Ieb6sQLAysTDCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfASzLWOkG1IUUECOU-H2pVp4eVA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Liberty Times: S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act</title>
    <link href="http://liberty-times.blogspot.com/2012/01/blog-post.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-20:/commentary/11713090</id>
    <updated>2012-01-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Liberty</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Attached below is the Nation Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Our president has already signed it. This is Law. It may seem very daunting to look at one of these bills just by seeing the size of it. Please begin to take your ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://liberty-times.blogspot.com/2012/01/blog-post.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PLQvT8nMK4arsALLvr2SDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH-tlufyax3-nkwMVmofr6vVc7dLA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/12046563</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PLQvT8nMK4arsALLvr2SDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH-tlufyax3-nkwMVmofr6vVc7dLA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MCspT_DcOYfq2AXw_f28BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHC1svkodOHonqKx3GSU-mdWCF_KA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11943531</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MCspT_DcOYfq2AXw_f28BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHC1svkodOHonqKx3GSU-mdWCF_KA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dh4pT6fYDaGGsgLf2-njAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGDNoGhWoEyTaw0xu8-8w9SJWB72w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11941750</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dh4pT6fYDaGGsgLf2-njAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGDNoGhWoEyTaw0xu8-8w9SJWB72w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8gApT_mBPbSmsQKgzb3nAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElfYq3uHPHDneu0wY8-CjInFhEVQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11938420</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8gApT_mBPbSmsQKgzb3nAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElfYq3uHPHDneu0wY8-CjInFhEVQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=y9YoT_ysMfKGsgLFmsSlAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSiKsKhZJO-pLF6OO5TFk6jaMBfw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11936885</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=y9YoT_ysMfKGsgLFmsSlAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSiKsKhZJO-pLF6OO5TFk6jaMBfw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oqwoT_mXD9K62gWXwMzDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJabbZZO6t5OFZhf93wmiW5l54_A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11932892</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oqwoT_mXD9K62gWXwMzDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJabbZZO6t5OFZhf93wmiW5l54_A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=boIoT7mnHMm_2QXy6um4Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGx-mXzZglOM7T_D24yH6PCctqdUA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11932747</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=boIoT7mnHMm_2QXy6um4Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGx-mXzZglOM7T_D24yH6PCctqdUA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=N1goT-f9CoTC2wWxyYDMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4MyUbk5gDH4rBFwuCONKe7ghHqw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11930007</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=N1goT-f9CoTC2wWxyYDMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4MyUbk5gDH4rBFwuCONKe7ghHqw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_y0oT7eWFIrCsQKVkfW_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzLmiSDQOX8qAC_dv9NQnPCseL1A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11923132</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_y0oT7eWFIrCsQKVkfW_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzLmiSDQOX8qAC_dv9NQnPCseL1A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PoUnT4jVF-OIsQKf2K39Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFAwgn_hIYlgVCn8p1DT3hfkc7sxw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11897486</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PoUnT4jVF-OIsQKf2K39Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFAwgn_hIYlgVCn8p1DT3hfkc7sxw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-FonT6WoGMma2gX6zsTCAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhDU6SJiHB90GD_VGOWTuHk4Oy7w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11893000</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-FonT6WoGMma2gX6zsTCAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhDU6SJiHB90GD_VGOWTuHk4Oy7w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xTAnT4iUBeT02wWq3ey_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzeGOWZw1Zq7KdS6e5b3DzgOhkXg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11892874</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xTAnT4iUBeT02wWq3ey_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzeGOWZw1Zq7KdS6e5b3DzgOhkXg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lQYnT5vhMOf4sQK_gt2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFa5XcmcxN7cDg_LtUTdzzBpazgIA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11892747</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lQYnT5vhMOf4sQK_gt2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFa5XcmcxN7cDg_LtUTdzzBpazgIA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9wmT-XwEuSusAKRs72NAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuVjhjyglA4xIgdlYg1bR2L91vhg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11891000</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9wmT-XwEuSusAKRs72NAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuVjhjyglA4xIgdlYg1bR2L91vhg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ULImT5n7FaiLsgL-mcmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE01rfetmFF2elILM7vcXMprxLdaw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11888259</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ULImT5n7FaiLsgL-mcmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE01rfetmFF2elILM7vcXMprxLdaw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JIgmT_XmEKrJsQLj_aiMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEUR1H3OlrX25ZdcnXiljzPfoRZig" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11882879</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JIgmT_XmEKrJsQLj_aiMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEUR1H3OlrX25ZdcnXiljzPfoRZig&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BHYmT4PGDJSosAL5zKyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrSti5nMpsPZgFin8HeAlA_0XUlA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11879960</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BHYmT4PGDJSosAL5zKyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrSti5nMpsPZgFin8HeAlA_0XUlA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1V0mT-H_G-XLsQK9n9yMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDoQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEigZXwxa76IrwSLf05mva8hdz38A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11876812</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1V0mT-H_G-XLsQK9n9yMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDoQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEigZXwxa76IrwSLf05mva8hdz38A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzMmT5PhLu2gsQKG-PGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhc5w8g-H-N172RZY2c3CzvzET6g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11874979</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzMmT5PhLu2gsQKG-PGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhc5w8g-H-N172RZY2c3CzvzET6g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eQkmT4OPGYavsALR5KWMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmbS-hMiXqbpsMI5Cbpn5_N8SHiQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11871725</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eQkmT4OPGYavsALR5KWMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmbS-hMiXqbpsMI5Cbpn5_N8SHiQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=at8lT9_3CcO3sQKW-cCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKrmehno2PwdZjZEGgML-6Eji2dA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11871596</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=at8lT9_3CcO3sQKW-cCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKrmehno2PwdZjZEGgML-6Eji2dA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MbUlT6XhDMmHsAKntqCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKokjC8hQKjd_tZtd8-FtlkNznSg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11869257</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MbUlT6XhDMmHsAKntqCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKokjC8hQKjd_tZtd8-FtlkNznSg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DIslT4u1K-GtsQLvqKCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEQ-27mCmhC4VL3Zh3dEcD5mMrfnA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11862160</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DIslT4u1K-GtsQLvqKCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEQ-27mCmhC4VL3Zh3dEcD5mMrfnA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WAlT8bkDsuKsAKn8OmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHTYyWlfVO3WHVBNsyQSCUxcfm_Ag" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11849835</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WAlT8bkDsuKsAKn8OmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHTYyWlfVO3WHVBNsyQSCUxcfm_Ag&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzYlT8H5DIqvsALLq9GMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGk0LzwCGURGY2pD_wQh5Q34ZD1Fw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11844333</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzYlT8H5DIqvsALLq9GMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGk0LzwCGURGY2pD_wQh5Q34ZD1Fw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZiUlT_2KN-rCsQLXse2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH-k8m3I_WShgONbNN-Yyyo8us0jw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11841770</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZiUlT_2KN-rCsQLXse2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH-k8m3I_WShgONbNN-Yyyo8us0jw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WgwlT97EO4OxsALrz4mNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7W_f6TUhgY5ahntQUZfM4M0WBUA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11838641</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WgwlT97EO4OxsALrz4mNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7W_f6TUhgY5ahntQUZfM4M0WBUA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuIkT6-6C4yqsALiq5CNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEOxmU1iOfIyb11RNenBZHwnmEmZQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11836757</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuIkT6-6C4yqsALiq5CNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEOxmU1iOfIyb11RNenBZHwnmEmZQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F7gkT_PHE4-CsgL25M2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfpplLzhDkYtmVC2B6g4WwYyodHg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11833271</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F7gkT_PHE4-CsgL25M2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfpplLzhDkYtmVC2B6g4WwYyodHg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Y0kT7jiGauksQLywOyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHuoZS1zLu9fB-g1bqHepGqqQRMRA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11833134</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Y0kT7jiGauksQLywOyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHuoZS1zLu9fB-g1bqHepGqqQRMRA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vmMkT6SaGe2AsgLFkLmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5HaKX3AwvHpjYavKy693SjIN4Gg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11829871</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vmMkT6SaGe2AsgLFkLmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5HaKX3AwvHpjYavKy693SjIN4Gg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hjkkT6eTEImJsALS7fGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGErKgNqVmFydubV64X0msJcOGg5g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11822975</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hjkkT6eTEImJsALS7fGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGErKgNqVmFydubV64X0msJcOGg5g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Xw8kT_yYA6LksQLtkaSMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGpcg00tymC1ZDICBTKpI23e0MVDg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11810667</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Xw8kT_yYA6LksQLtkaSMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGpcg00tymC1ZDICBTKpI23e0MVDg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P-UjT_WYK-mxsAKzoa2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVa1fqebZGo86xGdsCGiPVkrOeFg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11805716</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P-UjT_WYK-mxsAKzoa2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVa1fqebZGo86xGdsCGiPVkrOeFg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WdQjT7XWCeSmsQKDtamMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNaMzwvL9r2ZfPu_CuR0kuItgOpA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11803387</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WdQjT7XWCeSmsQKDtamMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNaMzwvL9r2ZfPu_CuR0kuItgOpA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3rojT9vTK8Loggf0_MHTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFMokoV7yBVAiJKsxWfNMtxCp_j4g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11800248</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3rojT9vTK8Loggf0_MHTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFMokoV7yBVAiJKsxWfNMtxCp_j4g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xZAjT4HkCYT-ggeoi7nhCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEw1Bg2Ek53LdHvwHbFhVwPGTaGmQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11798995</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xZAjT4HkCYT-ggeoi7nhCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEw1Bg2Ek53LdHvwHbFhVwPGTaGmQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m2YjT_GdKMT2ggeokLT7CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWis0JJNeGJzzkXT_Q3eEnt1ULtA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11795247</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m2YjT_GdKMT2ggeokLT7CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWis0JJNeGJzzkXT_Q3eEnt1ULtA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cTwjT9vTLsX7ggeD5v3bCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEAnbC-nsbn42jWKxv6EzmJiKZNVw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11795116</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cTwjT9vTLsX7ggeD5v3bCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEAnbC-nsbn42jWKxv6EzmJiKZNVw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QhIjT-yVCoaegwfgtIjnCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEWarDsjMRQ65w4gJ9cbvgUHTsjNA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11791291</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QhIjT-yVCoaegwfgtIjnCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEWarDsjMRQ65w4gJ9cbvgUHTsjNA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EugiT8H5FsmRsAKGp7yOCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHeQTyCGoJ4swfU2DPf-bS9cim_Jw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11784510</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EugiT8H5FsmRsAKGp7yOCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHeQTyCGoJ4swfU2DPf-bS9cim_Jw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EugiT8H5FsmRsAKGp7yOCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4G6s1hsIjIXbKFfKms-2-jPQGaA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11784508</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EugiT8H5FsmRsAKGp7yOCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4G6s1hsIjIXbKFfKms-2-jPQGaA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5r0iT8rHDKu_2QX_7IngDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdLwa4qNTzKrrQFPrx9L00Y1X77g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11772574</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5r0iT8rHDKu_2QX_7IngDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdLwa4qNTzKrrQFPrx9L00Y1X77g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5r0iT8rHDKu_2QX_7IngDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGOiX0gDYo-Bsy0PAMDei_wTgpH4A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11772572</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5r0iT8rHDKu_2QX_7IngDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGOiX0gDYo-Bsy0PAMDei_wTgpH4A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ppMiT6nGJceisQLvzfWECQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFxyM73xTYpGJdqMdOgX3ZTWNrNuw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11768057</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ppMiT6nGJceisQLvzfWECQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFxyM73xTYpGJdqMdOgX3ZTWNrNuw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ppMiT6nGJceisQLvzfWECQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRqwPtotBteNDQubWimUzNrUkxTA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11768055</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ppMiT6nGJceisQLvzfWECQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRqwPtotBteNDQubWimUzNrUkxTA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VYMiT52vMMji2QWBi_XeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFswNguGdVlVXvgcZktPKoLzkMu_Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11765484</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VYMiT52vMMji2QWBi_XeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFswNguGdVlVXvgcZktPKoLzkMu_Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VYMiT52vMMji2QWBi_XeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHB1RB9JaS23winrSc5SCwNolB99w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11765482</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VYMiT52vMMji2QWBi_XeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHB1RB9JaS23winrSc5SCwNolB99w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WmkiT7b_OejA2gXAhrXgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVsEUOskb03W63UDo-XB_9GY07_A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11762337</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WmkiT7b_OejA2gXAhrXgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVsEUOskb03W63UDo-XB_9GY07_A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Kz8iT8SaBMPDsQLD8qi1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFsSt3YMz6plAFgzThaIU6WUmE28A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11761013</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Kz8iT8SaBMPDsQLD8qi1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFsSt3YMz6plAFgzThaIU6WUmE28A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DBUiT_KmNMXy2QXqt5XfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEdh6UdayxkrCB5wOQfCqmxdfHzNw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11756857</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DBUiT_KmNMXy2QXqt5XfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEdh6UdayxkrCB5wOQfCqmxdfHzNw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5OohT965J4Trggf05qT8CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHaf8lM25Xhw7u50GOOI6klVZRR3Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11756637</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5OohT965J4Trggf05qT8CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHaf8lM25Xhw7u50GOOI6klVZRR3Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vcAhT7fCIc3hsQLU6PG6CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGlQ1WrMVkXcoHlc40cejSCyodaZA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11752033</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vcAhT7fCIc3hsQLU6PG6CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGlQ1WrMVkXcoHlc40cejSCyodaZA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jZYhT67gC8WqsQKtqtT_CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGD5GyYvEF3fx2P31O2uf291gZKaQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11744843</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jZYhT67gC8WqsQKtqtT_CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGD5GyYvEF3fx2P31O2uf291gZKaQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jZYhT67gC8WqsQKtqtT_CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH38Mlmthck9N0EhGaAwFX9FuDs5A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11744842</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jZYhT67gC8WqsQKtqtT_CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH38Mlmthck9N0EhGaAwFX9FuDs5A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WmwhT9HEKMa22gWX9uzxDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGS6VuHNGZqr89kp2ezwI7xoDT_Rg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11732899</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WmwhT9HEKMa22gWX9uzxDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGS6VuHNGZqr89kp2ezwI7xoDT_Rg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LUIhT_ihB7KnsAK2yqG4CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfn45RpxTFiiBzR1a9ulFuOHSicA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11728782</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LUIhT_ihB7KnsAK2yqG4CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfn45RpxTFiiBzR1a9ulFuOHSicA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mcMgT-zrH-KOsQL_prSlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqFLx2X78YXCtBLZ-6Zql6fysh0Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11717823</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mcMgT-zrH-KOsQL_prSlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqFLx2X78YXCtBLZ-6Zql6fysh0Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dJkgT9LOMs_fsQKX5qSYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHFrpz3FL-gVYsQhrRFF-9GPKFrPA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11717674</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dJkgT9LOMs_fsQKX5qSYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHFrpz3FL-gVYsQhrRFF-9GPKFrPA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Proof Obama will sign NDAA (S.1867) 1031 &amp;quot;American Citizen ...</title>
    <link href="http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/proof-obama-will-sign-ndaa-s-1867-1031-american-citizen-indefinite-detention-law/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11684528</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Proof Obama will sign NDAA (S.1867) 1031 &amp;quot;American Citizen Indefinite Detention Law&amp;quot;. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/proof-obama-will-sign-ndaa-s-1867-1031-american-citizen-indefinite-detention-law/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL ...</title>
    <link href="http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11684519</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://amyklobuchar.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/watch-sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS</title>
    <link href="http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-19:/commentary/11682796</id>
    <updated>2012-01-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SB (SENATE BILL) S.1867 SENATOR RAND PAUL RESPONDS. by admin on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack Obama ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://carllevin.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/19/sb-senate-bill-s-1867-senator-rand-paul-responds/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>INDEFINITE DETENTION OF AMERICANS &#8211; New NDAA Bill Passed ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.thugfighting.com/2012/01/16/indefinite-detention-of-americans-new-ndaa-bill-passed-by-obama/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-16:/commentary/11670172</id>
    <updated>2012-01-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.thugfighting.com/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
NDAA &#8211; National Defense Authorization Act 2012 Indefinite Detention of American Citizens without a trial Senate Passes S.1867 Bill 93-7 &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - John McCain Rand Paul Ron Paul, today Alex Jones, Fox abc cnn ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thugfighting.com/2012/01/16/indefinite-detention-of-americans-new-ndaa-bill-passed-by-obama/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: S.1867 &#8211; National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal ...</title>
    <link href="http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/13/watch-s-1867-national-defense-authorization-act-for-fiscal-year-2012/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-13:/commentary/11666850</id>
    <updated>2012-01-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: S.1867 &#8211; National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. by admin on Friday, January 13th, 2012 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2012/01/13/watch-s-1867-national-defense-authorization-act-for-fiscal-year-2012/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NDAA 1201 &amp;amp; S.1867 The Ultimate Treason:Robbing us of our ...</title>
    <link href="http://unitedstatessenate.iwantinfonow.com/2012/01/13/ndaa_1201__s-1867_the_ultimate_treasonrobbing_us_of_our_liberty_military_law_for_us_citizens/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-13:/commentary/11656656</id>
    <updated>2012-01-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Iwin Guru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Only Ron Paul is willing to vanquish this beast en.wikipedia.org www.aclu.org THE ONLY 13 PATRIOTS IN EXECUTIVE AND SENATE: (All others traitors including Obama all senators not mentioned here: Cardin (D-MD) ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://unitedstatessenate.iwantinfonow.com/2012/01/13/ndaa_1201__s-1867_the_ultimate_treasonrobbing_us_of_our_liberty_military_law_for_us_citizens/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Podcast: Quintiliani on SOPA and S. 1867 | zeldalegacy.net</title>
    <link href="http://www.zeldalegacy.net/podcast-quintiliani-on-sopa-and-s-1867" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-12:/commentary/11686301</id>
    <updated>2012-01-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>zeldalegacy</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Host Brian Duffy interviewed long time Repeal the 17th Discussion Board contributor Dan Quintiliani concerning the current legislation being pushed in the US Senate, SOPA and S.1867, both of which have far reaching ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zeldalegacy.net/podcast-quintiliani-on-sopa-and-s-1867&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rand Paul and John McCain S. 1867 | Financial Crisis</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://crisis.wordwd.com/2012/01/11/rand-paul-and-john-mccain-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LUIhT_ihB7KnsAK2yqG4CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEcDcPSM3doBrZi2xl8ZRJPpD393A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-11:/commentary/11728784</id>
    <updated>2012-01-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Rand Paul and John McCain spoke on the Senate floor about S. 1867, a bill dealing with Defense programs and policy, including terror detainee policy.FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://crisis.wordwd.com/2012/01/11/rand-paul-and-john-mccain-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LUIhT_ihB7KnsAK2yqG4CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEcDcPSM3doBrZi2xl8ZRJPpD393A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rand Paul and John McCain S. 1867 | Financial Crisis</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://crisis.wordwd.com/2012/01/11/rand-paul-and-john-mccain-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9TEhT9WgO--GsAKk9LCxCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqQkidVzhquBC7ehZn01bHDpqEPA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-11:/commentary/11726536</id>
    <updated>2012-01-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Rand Paul and John McCain spoke on the Senate floor about S. 1867, a bill dealing with Defense programs and policy, including terror detainee policy.FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://crisis.wordwd.com/2012/01/11/rand-paul-and-john-mccain-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9TEhT9WgO--GsAKk9LCxCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqQkidVzhquBC7ehZn01bHDpqEPA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rand Paul and John McCain S. 1867 | Financial Crisis</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://crisis.wordwd.com/2012/01/11/rand-paul-and-john-mccain-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xchT4jJCuissQLS48C1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEkxURBxFsIiTSEh36m9AsnKY9J9A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-11:/commentary/11723543</id>
    <updated>2012-01-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Rand Paul and John McCain spoke on the Senate floor about S. 1867, a bill dealing with Defense programs and policy, including terror detainee policy.FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://crisis.wordwd.com/2012/01/11/rand-paul-and-john-mccain-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xchT4jJCuissQLS48C1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEkxURBxFsIiTSEh36m9AsnKY9J9A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rand Paul and John McCain S. 1867 | Financial Crisis</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://crisis.wordwd.com/2012/01/11/rand-paul-and-john-mccain-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-0gT920Ieb6sQLAysTDCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0V_dknQ6HZ5K0QkJrdu_3P-IWGw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-11:/commentary/11722186</id>
    <updated>2012-01-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Rand Paul and John McCain spoke on the Senate floor about S. 1867, a bill dealing with Defense programs and policy, including terror detainee policy.FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://crisis.wordwd.com/2012/01/11/rand-paul-and-john-mccain-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-0gT920Ieb6sQLAysTDCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0V_dknQ6HZ5K0QkJrdu_3P-IWGw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rand Paul and John McCain S. 1867 | Financial Crisis</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://crisis.wordwd.com/2012/01/11/rand-paul-and-john-mccain-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mcMgT-zrH-KOsQL_prSlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZEfAa3h6CqoNs72SrnC2NXYEWCg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-11:/commentary/11717827</id>
    <updated>2012-01-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Rand Paul and John McCain spoke on the Senate floor about S. 1867, a bill dealing with Defense programs and policy, including terror detainee policy.FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://crisis.wordwd.com/2012/01/11/rand-paul-and-john-mccain-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mcMgT-zrH-KOsQL_prSlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZEfAa3h6CqoNs72SrnC2NXYEWCg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rand Paul and John McCain S. 1867 | Financial Crisis</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://crisis.wordwd.com/2012/01/11/rand-paul-and-john-mccain-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dJkgT9LOMs_fsQKX5qSYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFuqk8tBnzHN1LgfN0TRHVBo3TigQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-11:/commentary/11717678</id>
    <updated>2012-01-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Rand Paul and John McCain spoke on the Senate floor about S. 1867, a bill dealing with Defense programs and policy, including terror detainee policy.FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://crisis.wordwd.com/2012/01/11/rand-paul-and-john-mccain-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dJkgT9LOMs_fsQKX5qSYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFuqk8tBnzHN1LgfN0TRHVBo3TigQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rand Paul and John McCain S. 1867 | Financial Crisis</title>
    <link href="http://crisis.wordwd.com/2012/01/11/rand-paul-and-john-mccain-s-1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-11:/commentary/11646706</id>
    <updated>2012-01-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Rand Paul and John McCain spoke on the Senate floor about S. 1867, a bill dealing with Defense programs and policy, including terror detainee policy.FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://crisis.wordwd.com/2012/01/11/rand-paul-and-john-mccain-s-1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="http://occupythe99percent.com/2012/01/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-06:/commentary/11626942</id>
    <updated>2012-01-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>OccupyAdmin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://occupythe99percent.com/2012/01/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>goluckydonald: Today Obama signed NDAA S.1867 into law-not good</title>
    <link href="http://goluckydonald.blogspot.com/2012/01/today-obama-signed-ndaa-s1867-into-law.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-03:/commentary/11614513</id>
    <updated>2012-01-03T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Wolfie</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 could easily be misused under the same premise. Already ... S. 1867 would be that very bill, all they needed to deliver the nation into a perpetual state of martial law that would, no doubt, trump a presidential election. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://goluckydonald.blogspot.com/2012/01/today-obama-signed-ndaa-s1867-into-law.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>jakintexes: GovTrack: Senate Vote On Passage: S. 1867: National ...</title>
    <link href="http://jakintexes.blogspot.com/2012/01/govtrack-senate-vote-on-passage-s-1867.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-03:/commentary/11611270</id>
    <updated>2012-01-03T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>jakintexes</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
GovTrack: Senate Vote On Passage: S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. GovTrack: Senate Vote On Passage: S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. Posted by ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://jakintexes.blogspot.com/2012/01/govtrack-senate-vote-on-passage-s-1867.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>MTV Think Martial Law Commercials &#8211; National Defense ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.photobyaz.com/mtv-think-martial-law-commercials-national-defense-authorization-act-s-1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-02:/commentary/11613414</id>
    <updated>2012-01-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>AZ</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
www.thenorthwestreport.com National Defense Authorization Act (S. 1867) These commercials aired on MTV around 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.photobyaz.com/mtv-think-martial-law-commercials-national-defense-authorization-act-s-1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>MTV Think Martial Law Commercials &#8211; National Defense ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.photobyaz.com/mtv-think-martial-law-commercials-national-defense-authorization-act-s-1867/?utm_source=rss&amp;amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;amp;utm_campaign=mtv-think-martial-law-commercials-national-defense-authorization-act-s-1867" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-02:/commentary/11607675</id>
    <updated>2012-01-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>AZ</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
www.thenorthwestreport.com National Defense Authorization Act (S. 1867) These commercials aired on MTV around 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.photobyaz.com/mtv-think-martial-law-commercials-national-defense-authorization-act-s-1867/?utm_source=rss&amp;amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;amp;utm_campaign=mtv-think-martial-law-commercials-national-defense-authorization-act-s-1867&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Homeschool Mommy: Obama signed NDAA S.1867 into law-not ...</title>
    <link href="http://homeschoolmommy-lildread.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-signed-ndaa-s1867-into-law-not.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-01:/commentary/11607171</id>
    <updated>2012-01-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Big Dread</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Obama signed NDAA S.1867 into law-not good January 1, 2012. President Obama signed on Saturday the defense authorization bill, formally ending weeks of heated debate in Congress and intense lobbying by the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://homeschoolmommy-lildread.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-signed-ndaa-s1867-into-law-not.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Whats Hot: Obama signed NDAA S.1867 into law-not good January ...</title>
    <link href="http://bigdread.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-signed-ndaa-s1867-into-law-not.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-01:/commentary/11607170</id>
    <updated>2012-01-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Big Dread</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Obama signed NDAA S.1867 into law-not good January 1, 2012. President Obama signed on Saturday the defense authorization bill, formally ending weeks of heated debate in Congress and intense lobbying by the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bigdread.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-signed-ndaa-s1867-into-law-not.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>VN MADE &#187; Today Obama signed NDAA S.1867 into law-not good</title>
    <link href="http://vnmade.com/?p=14282" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-01:/commentary/11606532</id>
    <updated>2012-01-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Tom Do</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Despite including reservations that President Obama presumably had about commendatory NDAA S.1867 he upheld it anyway. Does this symbol a finish of a Bill Of Rights that we and we as American adults should have ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://vnmade.com/?p=14282&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Obama Signs Detention Bill NDAA S1867 &#171; johnconner1984</title>
    <link href="http://johnconner1984.wordpress.com/2011/12/31/obama-signs-detention-bill-ndaa-s1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-31:/commentary/11604204</id>
    <updated>2011-12-31T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>johnconner1984</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Obama Signs Detention Bill NDAA S1867. 31 Saturday Dec 2011 ... S. 1867 and the Federal Takeover of State and Local Governments ... Battlefield U.S.A. (S. 1867 National Defense Authorization Act) on Freedomlink Radio ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://johnconner1984.wordpress.com/2011/12/31/obama-signs-detention-bill-ndaa-s1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>{Be Informed!} Overlooked Language in NDAA (H.R. 1540 &amp;amp; S. 1867 ...</title>
    <link href="http://justpiper.com/2011/12/be-informed-overlooked-language-in-ndaa-h-r-1540-s-1867-and-oath-keepers-recall/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-30:/commentary/11599916</id>
    <updated>2011-12-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>justpiper (online)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A provision of S. 1867, or the National Defense Authorization Act bill, written by Senators John McCain and Carl Levin, declares American soil a battlefield and allows the President and all future Chief Executives to order the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://justpiper.com/2011/12/be-informed-overlooked-language-in-ndaa-h-r-1540-s-1867-and-oath-keepers-recall/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Wings of Lyra: Senate Vote On Passage: S. 1867: National ...</title>
    <link href="http://wingsoflyra.blogspot.com/2011/12/senate-vote-on-passage-s-1867-national.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-27:/commentary/11588486</id>
    <updated>2011-12-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Don Allen</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senate Vote On Passage: S. 1867: National Defense ... Ralph Ring - Ether Technology, Magnetism, Nikola T... Red Ice Radio - Anthony Sanchez - UFO Highway &amp;amp; &amp;quot;C... Morgellons Exposed - Jan Smith Home Page - Scribd ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wingsoflyra.blogspot.com/2011/12/senate-vote-on-passage-s-1867-national.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S 1867 NDAA Martial Law &#8734; All Your Rights DEAD 2012 U R All ...</title>
    <link href="http://theunhivedmind.com/wordpress/?p=17369" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-27:/commentary/11588485</id>
    <updated>2011-12-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>THEUNHIVEDMIND</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Will be Law on Jan 1 Your All Terrorists, going to take Gov&amp;#39;t Word No DUE Process ! national defence authorization act S. 1867 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act S 1867 NDAA End of Human ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://theunhivedmind.com/wordpress/?p=17369&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: YEA 93 &#8212; NAYs 7 Bill S. 1867 Passed ARE YOU A WAKE ...</title>
    <link href="http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2011/12/27/watch-yea-93-nays-7-bill-s-1867-passed-are-you-a-wake-yet-avi/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-27:/commentary/11588068</id>
    <updated>2011-12-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: YEA 93 &#8212; NAYs 7 Bill S. 1867 Passed ARE YOU A WAKE YET.avi. by admin on Tuesday, December 27th, 2011 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://randpaul.on-the-rag.com/2011/12/27/watch-yea-93-nays-7-bill-s-1867-passed-are-you-a-wake-yet-avi/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Devvy Kidd &#8212; Overlooked language in NDAA (H.R. 1540 &amp;amp; S. 1867 ...</title>
    <link href="http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2011/12/26/devvy-kidd-overlooked-language-in-ndaa-h-r-1540-s-1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-26:/commentary/11585366</id>
    <updated>2011-12-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Gunny G</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(gunnyg.wordpress.com); DEVVY&#8221;S EMAIL ALERTS: Final vote tomorrow: &#8220;While the disgraced &#8220;mainstream&#8221; media and cable networks have ignored S. 1867, the so called National Defense Authorization Act, the Internet has ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2011/12/26/devvy-kidd-overlooked-language-in-ndaa-h-r-1540-s-1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Devvy Kidd &#8212; Overlooked language in NDAA (H.R. 1540 &amp;amp; S. 1867 ...</title>
    <link href="https://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2011/12/26/devvy-kidd-overlooked-language-in-ndaa-h-r-1540-s-1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-26:/commentary/11583463</id>
    <updated>2011-12-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Gunny G</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Devvy Kidd &#8212; Overlooked language in NDAA (H.R. 1540 &amp;amp; S. 1867). December 26, 2011 Gunny G Leave a comment Go to comments. The Internet has been literally burning up over the National Defense Authorization Act. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2011/12/26/devvy-kidd-overlooked-language-in-ndaa-h-r-1540-s-1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>OVERLOOKED LANGUAGE IN NDAA (H.R. 1540 &amp;amp; S. 1867) &#171; The ...</title>
    <link href="http://theperpetualview.wordpress.com/2011/12/26/overlooked-language-in-ndaa-h-r-1540-s-1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-26:/commentary/11583285</id>
    <updated>2011-12-26T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>theperpetualview</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
OVERLOOKED LANGUAGE IN NDAA (H.R. 1540 &amp;amp; S. 1867). By: Devvy December 26, 2011 NewsWithViews.com. The Internet has been literally burning up over the National Defense Authorization Act. Another monstrous bill ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://theperpetualview.wordpress.com/2011/12/26/overlooked-language-in-ndaa-h-r-1540-s-1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: YEA 93 &#8212; NAYs 7 Bill S. 1867 Passed ARE YOU A WAKE ...</title>
    <link href="http://johnrockefeller.on-the-rag.com/2011/12/23/watch-yea-93-nays-7-bill-s-1867-passed-are-you-a-wake-yet-avi/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-23:/commentary/11576008</id>
    <updated>2011-12-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: YEA 93 &#8212; NAYs 7 Bill S. 1867 Passed ARE YOU A WAKE YET.avi. by admin on Friday, December 23rd, 2011 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://johnrockefeller.on-the-rag.com/2011/12/23/watch-yea-93-nays-7-bill-s-1867-passed-are-you-a-wake-yet-avi/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="http://danielakaka.on-the-rag.com/2011/12/21/watch-s-1867-national-defense-authorization-act-of-2012-indefinite-detainment-of-us-citizens/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-21:/commentary/11569367</id>
    <updated>2011-12-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 &#8211; Indefinite Detainment of US Citizens. by admin on Wednesday, December 21st, 2011 | No Comments. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://danielakaka.on-the-rag.com/2011/12/21/watch-s-1867-national-defense-authorization-act-of-2012-indefinite-detainment-of-us-citizens/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Alex Jones &#8211; Nighlty News: (S.1867) US Senators want to ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.mannam.tv/2011/12/21/alex-jones-nighlty-news-s-1867-us-senators-want-to-torture-and-detain-us-citizens-2_2/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-21:/commentary/11563202</id>
    <updated>2011-12-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
December 19th 2011 The latest Infowars.com uncovered document detailing the outline of the FEMA police state as it looks for detainment camp contractors. S. 1867 (NDAA): Secret Torture Provisions For Home Grown ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mannam.tv/2011/12/21/alex-jones-nighlty-news-s-1867-us-senators-want-to-torture-and-detain-us-citizens-2_2/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WAKE UP - S. 1867 NDAA False Arrests Secret Charges Americans ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.realistnews.net/Thread-wake-up-s-1867-ndaa-false-arrests-secret-charges-americans-will-happen-susan-lin" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-21:/commentary/11562506</id>
    <updated>2011-12-21T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.realistnews.net/User-stacyolson</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Shortly after requesting to testify before Congress about successful elements of Pre-War Intelligence, Susan Lindauer became one of the first non-Arab Americans arrested on the Patriot Act as an &amp;quot;Iraq.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realistnews.net/Thread-wake-up-s-1867-ndaa-false-arrests-secret-charges-americans-will-happen-susan-lin&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: YEA 93 &#8212; NAYs 7 Bill S. 1867 Passed ARE YOU A WAKE ...</title>
    <link href="http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2011/12/20/watch-yea-93-nays-7-bill-s-1867-passed-are-you-a-wake-yet-avi/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-20:/commentary/11561899</id>
    <updated>2011-12-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: YEA 93 &#8212; NAYs 7 Bill S. 1867 Passed ARE YOU A WAKE YET.avi. by admin on Tuesday, December 20th, 2011 | Comments Off. Rating: 4. Posted in Video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://johnmccain.on-the-rag.com/2011/12/20/watch-yea-93-nays-7-bill-s-1867-passed-are-you-a-wake-yet-avi/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Looking in The Mirror: S 1867 - Here is How the Traitors Voted</title>
    <link href="http://steppinoff.blogspot.com/2011/12/s-1867-here-is-how-traitors-voted.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-20:/commentary/11556534</id>
    <updated>2011-12-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mozart</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S 1867 - Here is How the Traitors Voted. Via; http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote ... Senate Vote On Passage: S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://steppinoff.blogspot.com/2011/12/s-1867-here-is-how-traitors-voted.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>#OccupyNashville Call To Action: Demand VETO of NDAA S. 1867 ...</title>
    <link href="http://occupynashville.org/2011/12/20/occupynashville-call-to-action-demand-veto-of-ndaa-s-1867-indefinite-detention/?utm_source=rss&amp;amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;amp;utm_campaign=occupynashville-call-to-action-demand-veto-of-ndaa-s-1867-indefinite-detention" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-20:/commentary/11556525</id>
    <updated>2011-12-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Josh</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
OccupyNashville Call To Action: Demand VETO of NDAA S. 1867 &amp;amp; Indefinite Detention Taking Back Our State.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://occupynashville.org/2011/12/20/occupynashville-call-to-action-demand-veto-of-ndaa-s-1867-indefinite-detention/?utm_source=rss&amp;amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;amp;utm_campaign=occupynashville-call-to-action-demand-veto-of-ndaa-s-1867-indefinite-detention&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>#OccupyNashville Call To Action: Demand VETO of NDAA S. 1867 ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.supportows.org/blog/occupy-nashville/occupynashville-call-to-action-demand-veto-of-ndaa-s-1867-indefinite-detention/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-20:/commentary/11556280</id>
    <updated>2011-12-20T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
OccupyNashville Call To Action: Demand VETO of NDAA S. 1867 &amp;amp; Indefinite Detention.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.supportows.org/blog/occupy-nashville/occupynashville-call-to-action-demand-veto-of-ndaa-s-1867-indefinite-detention/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Caller Talks About S.1867&#8242;s Secret Torture Provision for ...</title>
    <link href="http://victorspost.wordpress.com/2011/12/19/caller-talks-about-s-1867s-secret-torture-provision-for-homegrown-terrorist-video/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-19:/commentary/11550537</id>
    <updated>2011-12-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Victor</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Caller Talks About S.1867&#8242;s Secret Torture Provision for Homegrown Terrorist! (video). Posted by Victor on December 19, 2011 &amp;middot; TheAlexJonesChannel on Dec 19, 2011 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://victorspost.wordpress.com/2011/12/19/caller-talks-about-s-1867s-secret-torture-provision-for-homegrown-terrorist-video/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Caller Talks About S.1867&#8242;s Secret Torture Provision for ...</title>
    <link href="http://nw0.eu/2011/12/caller-talks-about-s-1867s-secret-torture-provision-for-homegrown-terrorist.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-19:/commentary/11550536</id>
    <updated>2011-12-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sysop</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Caller Talks About S.1867&#8242;s Secret Torture Provision for Homegrown Terrorist!! Seriously? Senate Considering Repeal of Anti-Torture Measures &amp;middot; Britain in Secret Talks with Syrian Rebels &amp;middot; Secret CIA Prison Found in ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nw0.eu/2011/12/caller-talks-about-s-1867s-secret-torture-provision-for-homegrown-terrorist.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Excavator: S. 1867 (NDAA): Secret Torture Provisions For ...</title>
    <link href="http://disquietreservations.blogspot.com/2011/12/s-1867-ndaa-secret-torture-provisions.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-19:/commentary/11550528</id>
    <updated>2011-12-19T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Saman Mohammadi</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Excavator. A Night Watchman On Guard Against The Wolves of State Terror And Psywar. December 19, 2011. S. 1867 (NDAA): Secret Torture Provisions For Homegrown Terrorists. Posted by Saman Mohammadi at 6:38 PM &amp;middot; Tweet ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://disquietreservations.blogspot.com/2011/12/s-1867-ndaa-secret-torture-provisions.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Occupiers and Tea Party, S.1867 NDAA- UNITE</title>
    <link href="http://www.bigbendbikersforfreedom.com/2011/12/occupiers-and-tea-party-s1867-ndaa.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-18:/commentary/11544957</id>
    <updated>2011-12-18T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>aka rc</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Occupiers and Tea Party, S.1867 NDAA- UNITE. If there is anything the Occupy movement and the Tea Party should be able to agree on (and there is more than either movement might think) it is that the 2012 National ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bigbendbikersforfreedom.com/2011/12/occupiers-and-tea-party-s1867-ndaa.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Democrats (and Some Republicans) and Another Christmas ...</title>
    <link href="http://redlaws.com/2011/12/18/senate-democrats-and-some-republican-and-another-christmas-surprise-s1867-martial-law/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-18:/commentary/11544289</id>
    <updated>2011-12-18T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Red Laws</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senate Democrats (and Some Republicans) and Another Christmas Surprise, S.1867 &#8211; Martial Law. By Red Laws | December 18th, 2011. &#171; Think You Can Rent Out Your Own House? Think Again! It was over the Christmas holiday in which ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://redlaws.com/2011/12/18/senate-democrats-and-some-republican-and-another-christmas-surprise-s1867-martial-law/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Protesting Indefinite Detention of Americans Without Charge; S. 1867</title>
    <link href="http://www.2by4law.com/protesting-indefinite-detention-of-americans-without-charge-s-1867.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-17:/commentary/11544290</id>
    <updated>2011-12-17T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Phoenix AE911Truth Action Team joined a protest organized by the Finish the War Coalition against the final passage of S. 1867 the Countrywide.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.2by4law.com/protesting-indefinite-detention-of-americans-without-charge-s-1867.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ElohimReigns Blog: S 1867 Indefinite Detention Bill Passes Senate ...</title>
    <link href="http://elohimreigns.blogspot.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-bill-passes.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-17:/commentary/11540038</id>
    <updated>2011-12-17T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Zhivago Tookland</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate codified into law the power of the U.S. military to indefinitely detain an American citizen with no charge, no trial and no oversight whatsoever with the passage of S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://elohimreigns.blogspot.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-bill-passes.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Martial Law: National Defense Authorization Act (S. 1867)</title>
    <link href="http://freenorthcarolina.blogspot.com/2011/12/martial-law-national-defense.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-16:/commentary/11540037</id>
    <updated>2011-12-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Brock Townsend</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Martial Law: National Defense Authorization Act (S. 1867). Via Knuckle Draggin My Life Away I don&amp;#39;t like borders that are open to illegal immigrants, smugglers and terrorists. I don&amp;#39;t like educational institutions that have no ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://freenorthcarolina.blogspot.com/2011/12/martial-law-national-defense.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>III Percent Patriots: AP: S. 1867</title>
    <link href="http://iiipercent.blogspot.com/2011/12/ap-s-1867.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-16:/commentary/11538197</id>
    <updated>2011-12-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kerodin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
III Patch - Get yours today! Click the Donate button above and contribute $10 or more and receive a III Patch. Proceeds will be used to further our III to Liberty Book Project or to help cover expenses for a few Patriots to attend ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://iiipercent.blogspot.com/2011/12/ap-s-1867.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Arctic Patriot: S. 1867</title>
    <link href="http://arcticpatriot.blogspot.com/2011/12/s-1867.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-16:/commentary/11538196</id>
    <updated>2011-12-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Arctic Patriot</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The brilliant torch of American liberty has faded to resemble more of an old fading chemlight. It&amp;#39;s there, but only just. S. 1867 is a traitorous piece of legislation that will quickly become a self- fulfilling prophecy. It contains blatant ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://arcticpatriot.blogspot.com/2011/12/s-1867.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How Long, How Far? National Defense Authorization Act (S. 1867)</title>
    <link href="http://www.fedupusa.org/2011/12/how-long-how-far-national-defense-authorization-act-s-1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-16:/commentary/11538176</id>
    <updated>2011-12-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Stephanie</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
How Long, How Far? National Defense Authorization Act (S. 1867). December 16th, 2011 | Author: Stephanie. How long will it be before this happens here? Just how far away are we from this happening? ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fedupusa.org/2011/12/how-long-how-far-national-defense-authorization-act-s-1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RAND PAUL ON THE SENATE FLOOR S.1867 | Irritate The State ...</title>
    <link href="http://irritatethestate.net/2011/12/16/rand-paul-on-the-senate-floor-s-1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-16:/commentary/11537627</id>
    <updated>2011-12-16T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bnice2me</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Friday, December 16, 2011. You are here : Irritate The State Radio &#187; Big Brother &#187; RAND PAUL ON THE SENATE FLOOR S.1867. RAND PAUL ON THE SENATE FLOOR S.1867. Posted On Friday, 16 Dec 2011 By Bnice2me. Under Big ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://irritatethestate.net/2011/12/16/rand-paul-on-the-senate-floor-s-1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill S.1867: Legalization Of Martial Law, End Of The Republic ...</title>
    <link href="http://socialismisnottheanswer.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/bill-s-1867-legalization-of-martial-law-end-of-the-republic/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-15:/commentary/11537629</id>
    <updated>2011-12-15T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>1dragon</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Military Appropriation Bill for 2012 Bill S.1867 will pass as early as tomorrow, Dec. 15 2011, and be signed into law by the President. This innocuous sounding Bill represents the end of any last pretence that the Republic ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://socialismisnottheanswer.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/bill-s-1867-legalization-of-martial-law-end-of-the-republic/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Apocalypse Paradigm: &amp;#39;Cracking Freedom&amp;#39;s Foundation&amp;#39; &#8211; S.1867 ...</title>
    <link href="http://apocalypseparadigm.blogspot.com/2011/12/cracking-freedoms-foundation-s1867.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-15:/commentary/11530133</id>
    <updated>2011-12-15T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>A'Esquecida</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&amp;quot;Global Warming is rooted in the manufactured belief the earth is in crisis &#8211; and that the United States is the single largest contributor to this crisis. Crisis relates quite well to chaos, yes? So the manufacturers of the Global ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://apocalypseparadigm.blogspot.com/2011/12/cracking-freedoms-foundation-s1867.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill S.1867 Legalization Of Martial Law, End Of The Republic ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.ufo-blogger.com/2011/12/ndaa-bill-s1867-legalization-of-martial.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-15:/commentary/11529839</id>
    <updated>2011-12-15T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>noreply@blogger.com (UFO Blogger)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Military Appropriation Bill for 2012 Bill S.1867 will pass as early as tomorrow, Dec. 15 2011, and be signed into law by the President. This innocuous sounding Bill represents the end of any last pretence that the Republic ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ufo-blogger.com/2011/12/ndaa-bill-s1867-legalization-of-martial.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Medical: MedicalConspiracies- MTV Martial Law Commercial ...</title>
    <link href="http://newsmedicalworld.blogspot.com/2011/12/medicalconspiracies-mtv-martial-law.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-15:/commentary/11528755</id>
    <updated>2011-12-15T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Medical</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MedicalConspiracies- MTV Martial Law Commercial - National Defense Authorization Act (S. 1867). These videos CORRECTLY ... S 1867 and its NAZI WHORES OF REPRESENTATIVES. counter bill. VELKOM TU ZEE ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newsmedicalworld.blogspot.com/2011/12/medicalconspiracies-mtv-martial-law.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The New Level of Tyranny &#8211; &#8220;National Defense Authorization Act&#8221; (S ...</title>
    <link href="http://truthandculture.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/the-new-level-of-tyranny-national-defense-authorization-act-s-1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-15:/commentary/11525954</id>
    <updated>2011-12-15T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Brian Phillips</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The New Level of Tyranny &#8211; &#8220;National Defense Authorization Act&#8221; (S. 1867). December 15, 2011 by Brian Phillips. &#8220;A Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://truthandculture.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/the-new-level-of-tyranny-national-defense-authorization-act-s-1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>InTransit: This is what Bill S.1867 is about!!, WAKE UP USA!!</title>
    <link href="http://phoenixlonewolf.blogspot.com/2011/12/this-is-what-bill-s1867-is-about-wake.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-15:/commentary/11525711</id>
    <updated>2011-12-15T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IAmPhoenix</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill. Senators Carl Levin (D) MI and John McCain (R) AZ, are bringing this bill to the Senate floor on Monday after having held secret committee meetings while never holding ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://phoenixlonewolf.blogspot.com/2011/12/this-is-what-bill-s1867-is-about-wake.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill S.1867: Legalization of Martial Law, End of the Republic &#8212; The ...</title>
    <link href="http://theblotch.com/wordpress/?p=1738" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-14:/commentary/11523162</id>
    <updated>2011-12-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Splotch</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Military Appropriation Bill for 2012 Bill S.1867 will pass as early as tomorrow, Dec. 15 2011, and be signed into law by the President. This innocuous sounding Bill represents the end of any last pretence that the Republic of.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://theblotch.com/wordpress/?p=1738&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ex-CIA Agent Gives The Answer to S. 1867 and the Tyranny!</title>
    <link href="http://forum.batr.net/showthread.php?tid=1878" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-14:/commentary/11523092</id>
    <updated>2011-12-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://forum.batr.net/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Hello There, Guest! Login Register &amp;middot; BREAKING ALL THE RULES Forum &#8250; Despotism and Tyranny &#8250; Rulers, Agents and Officials v. 1 2 3 4 5 Next &#187;. Ex-CIA Agent Gives The Answer to S. 1867 and the Tyranny! Post Reply ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.batr.net/showthread.php?tid=1878&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act: Part 2 &#8211; The Remix ...</title>
    <link href="http://yoy50.wordpress.com/2011/12/14/s-1867-national-defense-authorization-act-part-2-the-remix/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-14:/commentary/11519534</id>
    <updated>2011-12-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>yoy50</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act: Have You Heard Of It? (and you thought this couldn&amp;#39;t happen&#8230; hmph) &amp;middot; Cloud Falls From The Sky! Wicked Science Right Before Your Eyes!! Kirstie Alley: Another &#8220;Sex Kitten&#8221; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://yoy50.wordpress.com/2011/12/14/s-1867-national-defense-authorization-act-part-2-the-remix/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 and the Federal Takeover of State and Local Governments ...</title>
    <link href="http://johnconner1984.wordpress.com/2011/12/12/s-1867-and-the-federal-takeover-of-state-and-local-governments/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-13:/commentary/11530134</id>
    <updated>2011-12-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>johnconner1984</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1867 and the Federal Takeover of State and Local Governments. 12 Monday Dec 2011. Posted by johnconner1984 in Activism, News, Radio, Video. &#8776; Leave a Comment. Tags. security, FEMA, America, and, S.1867, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://johnconner1984.wordpress.com/2011/12/12/s-1867-and-the-federal-takeover-of-state-and-local-governments/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Update on S 1867 (NDAA) | Wrap Your Head Around</title>
    <link href="http://wrapyourheadaround.com/2011/12/13/update-on-s-1867-ndaa/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-13:/commentary/11516698</id>
    <updated>2011-12-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Michael</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
So where do we stand with the National Defense Authorization Act, (NDAA) also refered to as S. 1867. I wrote about this the other day here, but I wanted to give our readers an update. After it passed the Senate, 93-7, it went ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wrapyourheadaround.com/2011/12/13/update-on-s-1867-ndaa/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 will take away Due Process - a fundamental aspect of ...</title>
    <link href="http://dreamacttexas.blogspot.com/2011/12/s-1867-will-take-away-due-process.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-13:/commentary/11515770</id>
    <updated>2011-12-13T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Marie-Theresa Hern&#225;ndez, PhD</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The concern about S. 1987 the 2011 Defense Authorization Act is that Due Process for U.S. citizens will be lost. See the definition below of Due Process. Click HERE for the complete text of S. 1867 as passed by the U.S. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dreamacttexas.blogspot.com/2011/12/s-1867-will-take-away-due-process.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) &#8211; S.1867 | teamsiems</title>
    <link href="http://teamsiems.com/2011/12/national-defense-authorization-act-ndaa-s-1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-12:/commentary/11511736</id>
    <updated>2011-12-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (S.1867). Title X, Subtitle D, SEC 1031. Subtitle D &#8211; Detainee Matters. SEC. 1031. AFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://teamsiems.com/2011/12/national-defense-authorization-act-ndaa-s-1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act: Have You Heard Of It ...</title>
    <link href="http://yoy50.wordpress.com/2011/12/12/s-1867-national-defense-authorization-act-have-you-heard-of-it-and-you-thought-this-couldnt-happen-hmph/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-12:/commentary/11511624</id>
    <updated>2011-12-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>yoy50</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act: Have You Heard Of It? (and you thought this couldn&amp;#39;t happen&#8230; hmph) &amp;middot; Cloud Falls From The Sky! Wicked Science Right Before Your Eyes!! Kirstie Alley: Another &#8220;Sex Kitten&#8221; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://yoy50.wordpress.com/2011/12/12/s-1867-national-defense-authorization-act-have-you-heard-of-it-and-you-thought-this-couldnt-happen-hmph/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[WATCH]: YEA 93 &#8212; NAYs 7 Bill S. 1867 Passed ARE YOU A WAKE ...</title>
    <link href="http://lindseygraham.on-the-rag.com/2011/12/12/watch-yea-93-nays-7-bill-s-1867-passed-are-you-a-wake-yet-avi/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-12:/commentary/11511623</id>
    <updated>2011-12-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[WATCH]: YEA 93 &#8212; NAYs 7 Bill S. 1867 Passed ARE YOU A WAKE YET.avi. by admin on Monday, December 12th, 2011 | Comments Off. Rating: 5. Posted in video&amp;#39;s. Comments are closed. Pages. About &amp;middot; Build a blog like this: &amp;middot; Pres. Barack ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lindseygraham.on-the-rag.com/2011/12/12/watch-yea-93-nays-7-bill-s-1867-passed-are-you-a-wake-yet-avi/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Moridins Keep: Ex-CIA Agent Gives The Answer to S. 1867 and the ...</title>
    <link href="http://moridinskeep.blogspot.com/2011/12/ex-cia-agent-gives-answer-to-s-1867-and.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-12:/commentary/11510787</id>
    <updated>2011-12-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>[MZK] MoRiDiN</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Ex-CIA Agent Gives The Answer to S. 1867 and the Tyranny! Moridin 12.12.2011. Listen to this guy! Posted by [MZK] MoRiDiN at 9:44 AM &amp;middot; Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook. 0 comments: Post a Comment ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://moridinskeep.blogspot.com/2011/12/ex-cia-agent-gives-answer-to-s-1867-and.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: Obama Personally Told Committee That He Demanded ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.freedom-won.net/s-1867-obama-personally-told-committee-that-he-demanded-authority-to-imprison-you-at-will-senate-video/533159/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-11:/commentary/11593739</id>
    <updated>2011-12-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>F-Won</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I am angry. As I sit at my computer this Sunday morning, I type with fingers that are trembling from...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freedom-won.net/s-1867-obama-personally-told-committee-that-he-demanded-authority-to-imprison-you-at-will-senate-video/533159/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867, My thoughts on the Senate passage. &#171; hmmiller79</title>
    <link href="http://hmmiller79.wordpress.com/2011/12/11/s-1867-my-thoughts-on-the-senate-passage/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-11:/commentary/11508981</id>
    <updated>2011-12-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>hmmiller79</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867, My thoughts on the Senate passage. Leave a Comment Posted by hmmiller79 on December 11, 2011. Normally when Congress or the Senate passes a bill I pay little attention, however this bill (S.1867) is much different. To quell the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hmmiller79.wordpress.com/2011/12/11/s-1867-my-thoughts-on-the-senate-passage/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: Obama Personally Told Committee That He Demanded ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.freedom-won.net/s-1867-obama-personally-told-committee-that-he-demanded-authority-to-imprison-you-at-will-senate-video/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-11:/commentary/11508291</id>
    <updated>2011-12-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>F-Won</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I am angry. As I sit at my computer this Sunday morning, I type with fingers that are trembling from...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freedom-won.net/s-1867-obama-personally-told-committee-that-he-demanded-authority-to-imprison-you-at-will-senate-video/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 (National Defense Authorization Act): Obama Administration ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xObDStJBDzc" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-11:/commentary/11507388</id>
    <updated>2011-12-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>TheFreedomlinkRadio</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Ah Ha! ... and the truth will set you free! Thanks to YouTuber: http://www.youtube.com/user/poiqweruadjfkewrijo?feature=watch for this great video! http://ww...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xObDStJBDzc&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Progressive Mind &#187; This is what Bill S.1867 is about!!, WAKE UP ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.theprogressivemind.info/?p=76659" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-11:/commentary/11507121</id>
    <updated>2011-12-11T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill. Senators Carl Levin (D) MI and John McCain (R) AZ, are bringing this bill to the Senate floor on Monday after having held secret committee meetings while never holding ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theprogressivemind.info/?p=76659&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>MTV Martial Law Commercial &#8211; National Defense Authorization Act (S.</title>
    <link href="http://deadlinelive.info/2011/12/10/mtv-martial-law-commercial-national-defense-authorization-act-s-1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-10:/commentary/11503042</id>
    <updated>2011-12-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Jack Blood</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MTV Martial Law Commercial &#8211; National Defense Authorization Act (S. 1867). December 10, 2011 by Jack Blood Filed under Media &amp;middot; Leave a Comment. Conditioning&#8230;.Predictive pre-programming anyone? http://www.oriontalkradio.com ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://deadlinelive.info/2011/12/10/mtv-martial-law-commercial-national-defense-authorization-act-s-1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Approves S. 1867 Bill That Authorizes Sodomy and Bestiality ...</title>
    <link href="http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-10:/commentary/11500708</id>
    <updated>2011-12-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Adam Nelson</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Today the horrow was realized as the US Senate Approved S. 1867, effectively allowing various version of sodomy and bestiality to become legal for US soldiers. CW Global News (christwire.org) &#8211; The United States Senate [.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867 the End of the Constitution and America As We Know It ...</title>
    <link href="http://dprogram.net/2011/12/10/s-1867-the-end-of-the-constitution-and-america-as-we-know-it/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-10:/commentary/11500515</id>
    <updated>2011-12-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sakerfa</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(IntelHub) &#8211; Madison Ruppert, a frequent Intel Hub contributor and founder of the website EndtheLie.com, recently did an outstanding interview exposing the truths about S.1867 which effectively ends the Constitution and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dprogram.net/2011/12/10/s-1867-the-end-of-the-constitution-and-america-as-we-know-it/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Approves S. 1867 Bill That Authorizes Sodomy and Bestiality ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVVVT-nfFPKpsALFt4jwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHgesksTE5lc_FjQthO5GlOjB1wHA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-09:/commentary/12976883</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Adam Nelson</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Homosexuality is the greatest threat to America. After US President Barack Hussein Obama repealed the crucial &#8220;Don&amp;#39;t Ask, Don&amp;#39;t Tell&#8221; military policy and told gays to &#8220;Do Ask, Do Tell&#8221;, many feared that the action would be the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVVVT-nfFPKpsALFt4jwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHgesksTE5lc_FjQthO5GlOjB1wHA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Approves S. 1867 Bill That Authorizes Sodomy and Bestiality ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iStVT_iNCeKHsgLygPXvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHd7hUJZqQmXx2-g3w5Hhc3gJsSxA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-09:/commentary/12971980</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Adam Nelson</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Homosexuality is the greatest threat to America. After US President Barack Hussein Obama repealed the crucial &#8220;Don&amp;#39;t Ask, Don&amp;#39;t Tell&#8221; military policy and told gays to &#8220;Do Ask, Do Tell&#8221;, many feared that the action would be the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iStVT_iNCeKHsgLygPXvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHd7hUJZqQmXx2-g3w5Hhc3gJsSxA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Approves S. 1867 Bill That Authorizes Sodomy and Bestiality ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WQFVT-udJaT_sQKk8tyKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrSC6IVyZM1bC52Q83oVDEgyM1Sw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-09:/commentary/12965589</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Adam Nelson</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Homosexuality is the greatest threat to America. After US President Barack Hussein Obama repealed the crucial &#8220;Don&amp;#39;t Ask, Don&amp;#39;t Tell&#8221; military policy and told gays to &#8220;Do Ask, Do Tell&#8221;, many feared that the action would be the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WQFVT-udJaT_sQKk8tyKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrSC6IVyZM1bC52Q83oVDEgyM1Sw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Approves S. 1867 Bill That Authorizes Sodomy and Bestiality ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iNhUT9ypEuahsgKG4_XvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFnQLUG3OQfxS9-6bf377E0zv3jCA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-09:/commentary/12954649</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Adam Nelson</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Homosexuality is the greatest threat to America. After US President Barack Hussein Obama repealed the crucial &#8220;Don&amp;#39;t Ask, Don&amp;#39;t Tell&#8221; military policy and told gays to &#8220;Do Ask, Do Tell&#8221;, many feared that the action would be the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iNhUT9ypEuahsgKG4_XvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFnQLUG3OQfxS9-6bf377E0zv3jCA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Approves S. 1867 Bill That Authorizes Sodomy and Bestiality ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ycBUT4KODoKAsgKH94zwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHWK4WluA94cSaRQkkU55O3R4Z2jg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-09:/commentary/12951807</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Adam Nelson</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Homosexuality is the greatest threat to America. After US President Barack Hussein Obama repealed the crucial &#8220;Don&amp;#39;t Ask, Don&amp;#39;t Tell&#8221; military policy and told gays to &#8220;Do Ask, Do Tell&#8221;, many feared that the action would be the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ycBUT4KODoKAsgKH94zwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHWK4WluA94cSaRQkkU55O3R4Z2jg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Approves S. 1867 Bill That Authorizes Sodomy and Bestiality ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C61UT9CNIPGDsgKwpqHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXLJuIqce-wpF09FxINv7X4RaF6g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-09:/commentary/12949744</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Adam Nelson</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Homosexuality is the greatest threat to America. After US President Barack Hussein Obama repealed the crucial &#8220;Don&amp;#39;t Ask, Don&amp;#39;t Tell&#8221; military policy and told gays to &#8220;Do Ask, Do Tell&#8221;, many feared that the action would be the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C61UT9CNIPGDsgKwpqHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXLJuIqce-wpF09FxINv7X4RaF6g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Approves S. 1867 Bill That Authorizes Sodomy and Bestiality ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OoRUT_yOMOvksQKa4tTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEjEEUjyRs9uFOeVB3vApN08Wsf8g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-09:/commentary/12946589</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Adam Nelson</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Homosexuality is the greatest threat to America. After US President Barack Hussein Obama repealed the crucial &#8220;Don&amp;#39;t Ask, Don&amp;#39;t Tell&#8221; military policy and told gays to &#8220;Do Ask, Do Tell&#8221;, many feared that the action would be the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OoRUT_yOMOvksQKa4tTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEjEEUjyRs9uFOeVB3vApN08Wsf8g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Approves S. 1867 Bill That Authorizes Sodomy and Bestiality ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nFhUT47wNKaesQKsroDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJe_cdD4vHxFkWexKaOnW52Gyyaw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-09:/commentary/12945299</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Adam Nelson</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Homosexuality is the greatest threat to America. After US President Barack Hussein Obama repealed the crucial &#8220;Don&amp;#39;t Ask, Don&amp;#39;t Tell&#8221; military policy and told gays to &#8220;Do Ask, Do Tell&#8221;, many feared that the action would be the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nFhUT47wNKaesQKsroDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJe_cdD4vHxFkWexKaOnW52Gyyaw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Approves S. 1867 Bill That Authorizes Sodomy and Bestiality ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OoZTT9j9I4TlsQKE7YHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJUSwijj9SkCoM4HiVcFTRNI0upg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-09:/commentary/12916206</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Adam Nelson</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Homosexuality is the greatest threat to America. After US President Barack Hussein Obama repealed the crucial &#8220;Don&amp;#39;t Ask, Don&amp;#39;t Tell&#8221; military policy and told gays to &#8220;Do Ask, Do Tell&#8221;, many feared that the action would be the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OoZTT9j9I4TlsQKE7YHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJUSwijj9SkCoM4HiVcFTRNI0upg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Approves S. 1867 Bill That Authorizes Sodomy and Bestiality ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5GxTT8SNBovKsQKFo53wBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGX1ZsbqF_nehmLaB9UcjPmR6TLRg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-09:/commentary/12913182</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Adam Nelson</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Homosexuality is the greatest threat to America. After US President Barack Hussein Obama repealed the crucial &#8220;Don&amp;#39;t Ask, Don&amp;#39;t Tell&#8221; military policy and told gays to &#8220;Do Ask, Do Tell&#8221;, many feared that the action would be the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5GxTT8SNBovKsQKFo53wBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGX1ZsbqF_nehmLaB9UcjPmR6TLRg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Approves S. 1867 Bill That Authorizes Sodomy and Bestiality ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iVtTT9jcKuiDsAL5wJjwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF_1DQvCd7j5VF3uD_cPRvkbkMjLg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-09:/commentary/12911308</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Adam Nelson</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Homosexuality is the greatest threat to America. After US President Barack Hussein Obama repealed the crucial &#8220;Don&amp;#39;t Ask, Don&amp;#39;t Tell&#8221; military policy and told gays to &#8220;Do Ask, Do Tell&#8221;, many feared that the action would be the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iVtTT9jcKuiDsAL5wJjwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF_1DQvCd7j5VF3uD_cPRvkbkMjLg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Approves S. 1867 Bill That Authorizes Sodomy and Bestiality ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gjJTT-ChLYOosQK3kIHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_ifDQ8IsasBj-QV2HzPHTXMxswg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-09:/commentary/12907920</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Adam Nelson</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Homosexuality is the greatest threat to America. After US President Barack Hussein Obama repealed the crucial &#8220;Don&amp;#39;t Ask, Don&amp;#39;t Tell&#8221; military policy and told gays to &#8220;Do Ask, Do Tell&#8221;, many feared that the action would be the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gjJTT-ChLYOosQK3kIHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_ifDQ8IsasBj-QV2HzPHTXMxswg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Approves S. 1867 Bill That Authorizes Sodomy and Bestiality ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HAdTT5HGKfLgsQK897HwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGw09PkxIESRiEGZ-JU3HmNKV0rkA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-09:/commentary/12906615</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Adam Nelson</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Homosexuality is the greatest threat to America. After US President Barack Hussein Obama repealed the crucial &#8220;Don&amp;#39;t Ask, Don&amp;#39;t Tell&#8221; military policy and told gays to &#8220;Do Ask, Do Tell&#8221;, many feared that the action would be the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://christwire.org/2011/12/senate-approves-s-1867-bill-that-authorizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-in-us-military-national-defense-authorization-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HAdTT5HGKfLgsQK897HwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGw09PkxIESRiEGZ-JU3HmNKV0rkA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Conservative Action Alerts, the ACLU, and S. 1867</title>
    <link href="http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/conservative-action-alerts-the-aclu-and-s-1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-09:/commentary/11494565</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Blog</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Recently Conservative Action Alerts had covered the Senate&amp;#39;s passing of the Department of Defense Bill S. 1867, or the &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention of American Citizens&amp;#39; Bill. We had two pieces &#8212; one updated twice &#8212; first here and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/conservative-action-alerts-the-aclu-and-s-1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Jon Stewart on S. 1867 &#171; SGTreport.com</title>
    <link href="http://sgtreport.com/2011/12/jon-stewart-on-s-1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-09:/commentary/11493901</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>SGT</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Jon Stewart on S. 1867. Jon Stewart takes on the detention provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act. &#8220;You can take away our lives, but only we can take away our freedom!&#8221; The Daily Show Get More: Daily Show ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sgtreport.com/2011/12/jon-stewart-on-s-1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tYxpT87bMIPgsQKj9KmHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGekLakRKPoDZ6rwKZZ7XPIp2CSyQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13570733</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tYxpT87bMIPgsQKj9KmHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGekLakRKPoDZ6rwKZZ7XPIp2CSyQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bWJpT4-2C-TosQKh7bCbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcuBy3tFVRSC64px2O6FAZ-WVB7g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13569363</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bWJpT4-2C-TosQKh7bCbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcuBy3tFVRSC64px2O6FAZ-WVB7g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MThpT5nUJ4HKsQLLhNChCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHH1eZBR__ndVJHbDjkJptdKZ1q0g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13560695</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MThpT5nUJ4HKsQLLhNChCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHH1eZBR__ndVJHbDjkJptdKZ1q0g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8w1pT9uHOqWesQLCibiPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYyyt0aMVW18dtj9Ujr0MFUevGog" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13556507</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8w1pT9uHOqWesQLCibiPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYyyt0aMVW18dtj9Ujr0MFUevGog&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zeNoT_6AEMOOsQLO2uSPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHi1lw5bW6Q4cng8uyf2KHWyksx8A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13551868</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zeNoT_6AEMOOsQLO2uSPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHi1lw5bW6Q4cng8uyf2KHWyksx8A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3LloT52WBKLosQKMk8yqCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEQ0BXIsDlTvt3zKfIaWndIiDYW7g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13546005</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3LloT52WBKLosQKMk8yqCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEQ0BXIsDlTvt3zKfIaWndIiDYW7g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bI9oT9G3O432sQKzptSFCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEMLQF4eFiDX2P0B8yIvAs-M78W-Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13535352</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bI9oT9G3O432sQKzptSFCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEMLQF4eFiDX2P0B8yIvAs-M78W-Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=94FoT4azCuWW2AXy_K37CA&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHR1SUU3R8bv20oOtjrTCRpxLTB2w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13533836</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=94FoT4azCuWW2AXy_K37CA&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHR1SUU3R8bv20oOtjrTCRpxLTB2w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6mhoT4SyOoXfsQKPsZSXCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1EZ69QW89dmrr8wUOR1e-UfDS7w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13531669</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6mhoT4SyOoXfsQKPsZSXCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1EZ69QW89dmrr8wUOR1e-UfDS7w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GTtoT5_rO4qO2wWT172LCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE33Nzs5MfDQNrtnzJ1PI9ZZysZGg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13528095</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GTtoT5_rO4qO2wWT172LCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE33Nzs5MfDQNrtnzJ1PI9ZZysZGg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xBoT_OXPIGvsgLfytmHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzaTmp93fNjmalkOkpo1NQ5LCdYg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13526953</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xBoT_OXPIGvsgLfytmHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzaTmp93fNjmalkOkpo1NQ5LCdYg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xdplT5S-I6nMsQK40L2zDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFNuZFPpGMr1-aEnXDSr3c26xXAlQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13454358</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xdplT5S-I6nMsQK40L2zDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFNuZFPpGMr1-aEnXDSr3c26xXAlQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QphlT6GFOMGrsQK_zpC3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHmBJ29Y6btlnTfHMR0tDWvFJolnQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13448684</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QphlT6GFOMGrsQK_zpC3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHmBJ29Y6btlnTfHMR0tDWvFJolnQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6G1lT--iCaTjsQK0jb23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGC-X4j2yqBIPJrs9iECJtnWBIEuw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13447538</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6G1lT--iCaTjsQK0jb23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGC-X4j2yqBIPJrs9iECJtnWBIEuw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=80NlT8iCBoqFsAK0-b23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFqOEQtph6-HJsX4I-8jvszHXdHNw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13442424</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=80NlT8iCBoqFsAK0-b23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFqOEQtph6-HJsX4I-8jvszHXdHNw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nRllT-efBqf5sQL9g-23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHklb7xOr8tv3Aw-_ZxNTvik6Swng" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13438353</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nRllT-efBqf5sQL9g-23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHklb7xOr8tv3Aw-_ZxNTvik6Swng&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=f-9kT6-GBeGQsAKTofG2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFb_e-KnFQ0MbAWJM-V7at6H9HkTA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13433170</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=f-9kT6-GBeGQsAKTofG2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFb_e-KnFQ0MbAWJM-V7at6H9HkTA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RMVkT4SqI42qsAKZrqC2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8VEIDEr2KlWKEzSjoSPKPWG0VWg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13427116</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RMVkT4SqI42qsAKZrqC2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8VEIDEr2KlWKEzSjoSPKPWG0VWg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LJtkT7qCGMeKsQLIle22Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqLImyo5GxyiFeXD5wbDynkyHU1Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13416208</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LJtkT7qCGMeKsQLIle22Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqLImyo5GxyiFeXD5wbDynkyHU1Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_oxkT6rjGKKGsgK42dW2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVzul64kWki8y0zZAt7hFQVRsvuA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13414636</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_oxkT6rjGKKGsgK42dW2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVzul64kWki8y0zZAt7hFQVRsvuA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GnVkT5X8LrCDsAL7-qy2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEauKxxnEYgB04Gv6kwMoxeA1b_vg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13412434</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GnVkT5X8LrCDsAL7-qy2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEauKxxnEYgB04Gv6kwMoxeA1b_vg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XUdkT5iQOob22gWq1Y3gCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHRrWIP_GJpud2gAYW15WldGw9eeA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13408831</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XUdkT5iQOob22gWq1Y3gCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHRrWIP_GJpud2gAYW15WldGw9eeA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QRxkT5O9J6mPsQLum423Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEAVEpj9-mjggkTjqhA0IemS93vfA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13407664</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QRxkT5O9J6mPsQLum423Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEAVEpj9-mjggkTjqhA0IemS93vfA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W_JjT7meLeeW2AXtmcnbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgND-8-_psgIIwEpQODzJ6aSX9xg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13403928</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W_JjT7meLeeW2AXtmcnbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgND-8-_psgIIwEpQODzJ6aSX9xg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LchjT-r3AYHlsQL9uZGcCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGqj2ASgdYbRXvvJNsHiUemrF0Pag" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13403750</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LchjT-r3AYHlsQL9uZGcCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGqj2ASgdYbRXvvJNsHiUemrF0Pag&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AJ5jT6qtI4eFsALbg_SbCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-w_7nuPKELEWvPADrFhZ0b7l6Og" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13403562</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AJ5jT6qtI4eFsALbg_SbCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-w_7nuPKELEWvPADrFhZ0b7l6Og&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KUpjT--JBeKS2QXP1-XrCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGy08f55oJqRvV1lxPviUdcLftpdA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13398895</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KUpjT--JBeKS2QXP1-XrCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGy08f55oJqRvV1lxPviUdcLftpdA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pSFjT7GHDKbO2AWrkp3WCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKgqiK7bFPWwNolA8W4VIfn5L8rw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13398057</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pSFjT7GHDKbO2AWrkp3WCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKgqiK7bFPWwNolA8W4VIfn5L8rw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=avViT5LtJKeq2QX85tXPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsA4wqzHQk629Lf6LAKsTtOS7vJg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13395349</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=avViT5LtJKeq2QX85tXPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsA4wqzHQk629Lf6LAKsTtOS7vJg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U8tiT779Ie-psALizYGcCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnD3tOhpu_SxLLy1D28bKT_vuMDg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13389673</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U8tiT779Ie-psALizYGcCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnD3tOhpu_SxLLy1D28bKT_vuMDg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TKFiT-GILOrg2gXKxZTMCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE7fct_x1FmMiw6kVcNA-nsb4obVA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13381441</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TKFiT-GILOrg2gXKxZTMCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE7fct_x1FmMiw6kVcNA-nsb4obVA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5XZiT_jZK4aEsAL_srikDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYNjmcHRcyiqRIofhd-mNlojS05Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13377889</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5XZiT_jZK4aEsAL_srikDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYNjmcHRcyiqRIofhd-mNlojS05Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=30xiT6imPITW2gWS1azcCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFuRDAigADvkXUEiGcDOj4q2c70fg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13373953</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=30xiT6imPITW2gWS1azcCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFuRDAigADvkXUEiGcDOj4q2c70fg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fyJiT4GcMsK_2QXwvei2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG8rGVilBk3Jn3rv1YUzTBFIdoo3Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13364040</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fyJiT4GcMsK_2QXwvei2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG8rGVilBk3Jn3rv1YUzTBFIdoo3Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cx5iT5b0GerC2wWj_NXvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFASNgaRYCkzLiwkm8hFZ9nrg8epw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13362577</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cx5iT5b0GerC2wWj_NXvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFASNgaRYCkzLiwkm8hFZ9nrg8epw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uQBiT-36BqLlsQLbxrSkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFe3w86h7O95OJEzKJTRNf_DDmEyA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13361260</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uQBiT-36BqLlsQLbxrSkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFe3w86h7O95OJEzKJTRNf_DDmEyA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zs9hT4aWGOSJsgKJ8KWkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEovompfkWXx8e1LgWdMO7-M2xYgQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13358723</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zs9hT4aWGOSJsgKJ8KWkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEovompfkWXx8e1LgWdMO7-M2xYgQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-aNhT9j_HcX7sQK3hq2JAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEadjqe5PuCA0bZEZSwtlWH6jPztQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13355831</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-aNhT9j_HcX7sQK3hq2JAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEadjqe5PuCA0bZEZSwtlWH6jPztQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nHlhT4CXOOT42gXUjbWPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvRX9nwn2pyy8F4kEKdb50yfVP4A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13350880</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nHlhT4CXOOT42gXUjbWPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvRX9nwn2pyy8F4kEKdb50yfVP4A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gE9hT8DOO8_JsQK2-djyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFG2x3OvSzpKhELJhF21wnwd6s0Jg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13340470</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gE9hT8DOO8_JsQK2-djyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFG2x3OvSzpKhELJhF21wnwd6s0Jg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HiVhT_SSAcji2QX4x72CCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDFHkhLsxqvhrO3SLjHkNdZOICSA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13336482</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HiVhT_SSAcji2QX4x72CCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDFHkhLsxqvhrO3SLjHkNdZOICSA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9PpgT5meBY2H2AWE-OCaCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHl8GjuzVr0jAFKV37IzvCz8XRzJQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13332427</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9PpgT5meBY2H2AWE-OCaCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHl8GjuzVr0jAFKV37IzvCz8XRzJQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P9FgT7wPjIOwAuvv3JYI&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKOKYrPXiRj7WMfJu6Vd1pvwNLHg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13326276</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P9FgT7wPjIOwAuvv3JYI&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKOKYrPXiRj7WMfJu6Vd1pvwNLHg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KK5gT6KyFtTKsQL4oJSWCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFt1nlIpvm0DKRJPJO8G9i0YD1TOw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13318829</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KK5gT6KyFtTKsQL4oJSWCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFt1nlIpvm0DKRJPJO8G9i0YD1TOw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FKdgT6qzI8jL2QXH_cCdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvhsKQUsohHqduNALSU5KozeuaGw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13318347</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FKdgT6qzI8jL2QXH_cCdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvhsKQUsohHqduNALSU5KozeuaGw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iYBgT-T_CYXm2AWXvuSpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvuHL9Me-ZZcWSLIeW7QjSIWiTSQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13315818</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iYBgT-T_CYXm2AWXvuSpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvuHL9Me-ZZcWSLIeW7QjSIWiTSQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0VJgT5qeD4Pu2gXm-a2BCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXo6tKVWXLgD29jRKwj3JMKdiONg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13312933</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0VJgT5qeD4Pu2gXm-a2BCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXo6tKVWXLgD29jRKwj3JMKdiONg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EyhgT7v8FYrg2AX8p5mVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGCtLvwBhqW0yAo-kTksWuYNX8p1w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13310582</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EyhgT7v8FYrg2AX8p5mVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGCtLvwBhqW0yAo-kTksWuYNX8p1w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9v1fT4fXFcWGsgLYtICiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWAbHjRyLalBvJcVjZ7iGRx734WQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13300530</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9v1fT4fXFcWGsgLYtICiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWAbHjRyLalBvJcVjZ7iGRx734WQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lNNfT43UFc-JsAK2nYWTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHJGeoqz3ZaPLW1-zAZYCykanRpxg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13296298</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lNNfT43UFc-JsAK2nYWTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHJGeoqz3ZaPLW1-zAZYCykanRpxg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jqlfT63bNcTC2wWFr9SSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVjIoTxyhrdccVlCHbiBDFWDjknQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13291373</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jqlfT63bNcTC2wWFr9SSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVjIoTxyhrdccVlCHbiBDFWDjknQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oH9fT-m0OMSvsgKq2bykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHwsBAzlgPwLNk12YGUYUJSYd0gw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13284311</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oH9fT-m0OMSvsgKq2bykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHwsBAzlgPwLNk12YGUYUJSYd0gw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O1ZfT5BcwqDaBZaqgYQI&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHwg0A3sFKH4a28wzTlR94YMQS0nA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13276609</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O1ZfT5BcwqDaBZaqgYQI&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHwg0A3sFKH4a28wzTlR94YMQS0nA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KkpfT-nWDoPq2QWDs4CnCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHyVxxYCHYluT1QLE15INxT3dXUnw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13275923</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KkpfT-nWDoPq2QWDs4CnCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHyVxxYCHYluT1QLE15INxT3dXUnw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MC5fT-ziGMbS2QX8xeWJCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFE2sacWFImPS0EUR-__3UWKgyVzw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13273611</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MC5fT-ziGMbS2QX8xeWJCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFE2sacWFImPS0EUR-__3UWKgyVzw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LAFfT_OxM8fe2AXqmcGpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUgCyGBFSOLLMfCzjzgowrCxBWeA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13270457</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LAFfT_OxM8fe2AXqmcGpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUgCyGBFSOLLMfCzjzgowrCxBWeA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9ZeT8m5CuOy2wWxg9yzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTQHJnWxEjYqBrTnbUXuMEEfaVmA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13269223</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9ZeT8m5CuOy2wWxg9yzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTQHJnWxEjYqBrTnbUXuMEEfaVmA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bKxeT_PUBenC2wXGh-DzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEf9zzTWjasOoHHURS1hM4tdqFRIA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13259239</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bKxeT_PUBenC2wXGh-DzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEf9zzTWjasOoHHURS1hM4tdqFRIA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SoJeT8HbOIeFsALi6cTNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE3fU6zQU1dfUuRIyQ91yO2z9N8fA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13254755</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SoJeT8HbOIeFsALi6cTNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE3fU6zQU1dfUuRIyQ91yO2z9N8fA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_FdeT7m_MOHi2gW5-N2HDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGC9TJ3mO8Bm8PemcuDoHvbvKCjtA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13249856</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_FdeT7m_MOHi2gW5-N2HDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGC9TJ3mO8Bm8PemcuDoHvbvKCjtA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DS5eT4LLKJTisQL-i63EDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFBqLgWuWbimGoH4oxVNZkr1eGsvg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13244659</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DS5eT4LLKJTisQL-i63EDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFBqLgWuWbimGoH4oxVNZkr1eGsvg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FgReT5jECojO2wWO_KHaDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9uZPpf0W1Ja3HPxiBoV-W_srt5Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13235037</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FgReT5jECojO2wWO_KHaDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9uZPpf0W1Ja3HPxiBoV-W_srt5Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jvtdT62XLOeW2AXDn6zCAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEH1zIn4DqFam6G6k-Sv3_AfsGjkA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13234365</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jvtdT62XLOeW2AXDn6zCAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEH1zIn4DqFam6G6k-Sv3_AfsGjkA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ut1dT-vgJ-Oo2wWayZ37Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-RHJGVws6qRG-tuEKxnnE4hY2FA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13232137</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ut1dT-vgJ-Oo2wWayZ37Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-RHJGVws6qRG-tuEKxnnE4hY2FA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ta9dT4KvDaW02wWIrI2BDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuYWiigCM3GdE2ey9gFVRoHsYBSQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13228960</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ta9dT4KvDaW02wWIrI2BDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuYWiigCM3GdE2ey9gFVRoHsYBSQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GoVdT7K3A8Wa2AXvvdT8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE3oFI8C9ihW0V1l_bplHy3nwKmKA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13227689</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GoVdT7K3A8Wa2AXvvdT8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE3oFI8C9ihW0V1l_bplHy3nwKmKA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01pdT_q0KIqDsAKwxYXTDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFux5PO-Ab0EODjP8c6_pEh9ogTUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13219903</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01pdT_q0KIqDsAKwxYXTDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFux5PO-Ab0EODjP8c6_pEh9ogTUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kKdcT5CJKMjL2QXJwMGOBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGEQFtyYYxebYpi-GvFxk9SZ9GsHA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13193526</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kKdcT5CJKMjL2QXJwMGOBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGEQFtyYYxebYpi-GvFxk9SZ9GsHA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FcNbT561MY7hsQKrqrS_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHwsH8UbFnJOvzQ-IiQlNayFhl00A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13167792</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FcNbT561MY7hsQKrqrS_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHwsH8UbFnJOvzQ-IiQlNayFhl00A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=65hbT5e-OOWe2wXfwoCDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnUA-HDbPIckao9OrQtM6k1XoPTg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13162296</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=65hbT5e-OOWe2wXfwoCDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnUA-HDbPIckao9OrQtM6k1XoPTg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6W5bT6CRGuGQ2gXE9cT6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGGGT00NenXKB72qjLI3JKCaRHUfw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13152499</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6W5bT6CRGuGQ2gXE9cT6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGGGT00NenXKB72qjLI3JKCaRHUfw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WxbT8XWE4P02QXh2fDeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHppg_F1gvWK1yHurK1kgiRzWFLdg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13152243</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WxbT8XWE4P02QXh2fDeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHppg_F1gvWK1yHurK1kgiRzWFLdg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DkVbT9yXI6rM2AXSwomKAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG_O9X_E69JQe1B492-8y0wyQV6cw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13149179</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DkVbT9yXI6rM2AXSwomKAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG_O9X_E69JQe1B492-8y0wyQV6cw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZxtbT4KSGMqGsgLkjMXJDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGibgOUtHO1rtMGg2CeqW1aVG36sQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13146774</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZxtbT4KSGMqGsgLkjMXJDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGibgOUtHO1rtMGg2CeqW1aVG36sQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KPBaT5-2N4SNsALZmOWxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElQjWP9d7OqdVhoVKcNyxWxMfCjw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13145386</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KPBaT5-2N4SNsALZmOWxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElQjWP9d7OqdVhoVKcNyxWxMfCjw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-MVaT5qaHtSk2gWwqeHvDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJT_22to-8jhpKxWjSlcLiQ6bW9Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13136185</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-MVaT5qaHtSk2gWwqeHvDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJT_22to-8jhpKxWjSlcLiQ6bW9Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yptaT5ueAaad2QXgy8XwDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQ82Itd__9jpZ4gh2DbpGS6xGvPQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13132517</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yptaT5ueAaad2QXgy8XwDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQ82Itd__9jpZ4gh2DbpGS6xGvPQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PnJaT4f2I-Wg2AXSuYnjDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHVw3VgmkNVVwnnW2GC43v7Q3lXWQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13127738</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PnJaT4f2I-Wg2AXSuYnjDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHVw3VgmkNVVwnnW2GC43v7Q3lXWQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XkdaT833IJT1sQKokaTJDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGwts9phZxb872irzVkbdBJnGfxoA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13121543</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XkdaT833IJT1sQKokaTJDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGwts9phZxb872irzVkbdBJnGfxoA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mx1aT_G5LMK1sQLE66zkDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELaTf1zr2VqKCCae1qKvacwuep-Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13111294</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mx1aT_G5LMK1sQLE66zkDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELaTf1zr2VqKCCae1qKvacwuep-Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xRBaT9CvM6LlsQLWwYHaDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYIeco44wR2PlAkjxE8_LirXSdqg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13110009</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xRBaT9CvM6LlsQLWwYHaDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYIeco44wR2PlAkjxE8_LirXSdqg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UvNZT7HCBtTKsQKNjfnEDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZVV180lXRW5d9YBe3--NeQHAuDQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13107644</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UvNZT7HCBtTKsQKNjfnEDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZVV180lXRW5d9YBe3--NeQHAuDQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=w8lZT4KDD7OmsALwhYm5DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGF68h4zopbVti3Jwln5_-eA5BsfQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13104671</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=w8lZT4KDD7OmsALwhYm5DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGF68h4zopbVti3Jwln5_-eA5BsfQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r55ZT9WmMYuosAL5-tjZDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHkK2q8v5OTqhP92rzwkePkeu2gA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13103325</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r55ZT9WmMYuosAL5-tjZDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHkK2q8v5OTqhP92rzwkePkeu2gA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WnRZT9yzBofpsQLK-I3ADQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFIYjHhjMbViklo5iaOD6yKcbwduA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13098092</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WnRZT9yzBofpsQLK-I3ADQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFIYjHhjMbViklo5iaOD6yKcbwduA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LEpZT4XVNI32sQK179WuDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqor-kPxeDYBUyTCIT61Cf_DVIMg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13094025</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LEpZT4XVNI32sQK179WuDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqor-kPxeDYBUyTCIT61Cf_DVIMg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DSBZT-maNYb3sQKx7Z3XDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF6cRndRQlIg9in5ZbSSW7SeROzFA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13088959</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DSBZT-maNYb3sQKx7Z3XDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF6cRndRQlIg9in5ZbSSW7SeROzFA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8vVYT92JLIeQsAKOxKnKDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVslrtZez8U0jsT6a1ykJZjr-Dgg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13083105</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8vVYT92JLIeQsAKOxKnKDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVslrtZez8U0jsT6a1ykJZjr-Dgg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Y85YT-yADs3jsQKO2IjCDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEa1xcDB59dO6cl5n1loxdJ4xLFhw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13072566</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Y85YT-yADs3jsQKO2IjCDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEa1xcDB59dO6cl5n1loxdJ4xLFhw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vblYT5K-Maz2sQKcwLmPBg&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG0qeCgro3OHSQec36dN6spDD1GEQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13070761</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vblYT5K-Maz2sQKcwLmPBg&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG0qeCgro3OHSQec36dN6spDD1GEQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SKJYT-TfEceEsgKlruXbDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEO-ePJ5WkW1xDqCvQTkEknFGcA7Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13068499</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SKJYT-TfEceEsgKlruXbDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEO-ePJ5WkW1xDqCvQTkEknFGcA7Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1HdYT6S6KMb5sQL0k5GxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZSXEvOJp6MtTMgb7b5PMfJJQ3-w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13065246</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1HdYT6S6KMb5sQL0k5GxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZSXEvOJp6MtTMgb7b5PMfJJQ3-w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GE1YT9blOeansAL7rPmtDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLd1-HXhfgrMHMz_fq6kymoaj6fw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13063847</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GE1YT9blOeansAL7rPmtDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLd1-HXhfgrMHMz_fq6kymoaj6fw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4iJYT672D-SxsALTgr20DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGdTWd5MoNE5cWQR-WJycOA3mY5lQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13058527</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4iJYT672D-SxsALTgr20DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGdTWd5MoNE5cWQR-WJycOA3mY5lQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sPhXT6i7M6iPsQKAuajiDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFUMoETWh7mnj93ev-p_Xn_HCOCtQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13054733</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sPhXT6i7M6iPsQKAuajiDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFUMoETWh7mnj93ev-p_Xn_HCOCtQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A89XT5LuDYnu2gWFnLHPDg&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9dgGL39LdAOxgO_1uEp2UlqflHA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13049885</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A89XT5LuDYnu2gWFnLHPDg&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9dgGL39LdAOxgO_1uEp2UlqflHA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RaRXT62fHaPisQKxmNW1DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-vHzJqhAseC41cxqBVqRXhrCKeg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/13043727</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Contributing Malcontent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867. Dear Senator,. Normally, I am pleased with the Constitutional and responsible ways you have executed your office in support and service of the citizens of Idaho and the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://thirdrailers.com/opinions/letters-to-editor/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RaRXT62fHaPisQKxmNW1DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-vHzJqhAseC41cxqBVqRXhrCKeg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#8220;Shame&#8221; Letter to Senators who supported S. 1867 | Third Railers</title>
    <link href="http://thirdrailers.com/rooftops/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/11493875</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sosmith, Community Organizer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It appears that Locke&amp;#39;s wisdom, while still cogent today, has gone unheeded by the legislators in Washington D. C. In S. 1867, you placed a target on US Citizens. Shame on you for letting it pass in such a pitiful and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thirdrailers.com/rooftops/a-shame-letter-to-senators-who-supported-s-1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867 the end of the Constitution and America as we know it ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.americanpendulum.com/2011/12/08/s-1867-the-end-of-the-constitution-and-america-as-we-know-it/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/11493874</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 also known as the National Defense Authorization Act or NDAA of Fiscal Year 2012 allows for the indefinite detention of American citizens without charge or trial. It also allows Americans to be tortured and shipped ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanpendulum.com/2011/12/08/s-1867-the-end-of-the-constitution-and-america-as-we-know-it/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ye Olde Journalist: S.1867 the end of the Constitution and America ...</title>
    <link href="http://mrscottyl.blogspot.com/2011/12/s1867-end-of-constitution-and-america.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/11490480</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Cheyenne</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The pen is my sword in which to fight yellow Journalism. The truth is out there, and I am determined to report on it and tell it like it is, even if those claiming to be real journalists stick to their yellow stripes. Welcome to our Online ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mrscottyl.blogspot.com/2011/12/s1867-end-of-constitution-and-america.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Detaining American citizens and S.1867 | Wrap Your Head Around</title>
    <link href="http://wrapyourheadaround.com/2011/12/08/detaining-american-citizens-and-s1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/11490479</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Michael</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Several days ago, the Senate passed S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2012. You may have seen the headlines about it, usually something to the effect of &#8220;American citizens can now be detained ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wrapyourheadaround.com/2011/12/08/detaining-american-citizens-and-s1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: the end of the Constitution and America as we know it ...</title>
    <link href="http://endthelie.com/2011/12/08/s-1867-the-end-of-the-constitution-and-america-as-we-know-it-madison-ruppert-of-end-the-lie-on-rbn/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/11490475</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Madison Ruppert</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Notify me of new posts by email. Add your twitter username (no @ or http). End the Lie allows you to put your keywords with your name if you have had 9 approved comments. Use your real name and then @ your keywords ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://endthelie.com/2011/12/08/s-1867-the-end-of-the-constitution-and-america-as-we-know-it-madison-ruppert-of-end-the-lie-on-rbn/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The entire United States is now a war zone: S.1867 passes the ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.pakalertpress.com/2011/12/08/the-entire-united-states-is-now-a-war-zone-s-1867-passes-the-senate-with-massive-support/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-08:/commentary/11486658</id>
    <updated>2011-12-08T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>truther</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This is one of the most tragic events I have written about since establishing End the Lie over eight months ago: the horrendous bill that would turn all of America into a battlefield and subject American citizens to indefinite ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pakalertpress.com/2011/12/08/the-entire-united-states-is-now-a-war-zone-s-1867-passes-the-senate-with-massive-support/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DREAM ACT - TEXAS: Senate Bill S. 1867 and the Indefinite ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://dreamacttexas.blogspot.com/2011/12/senate-bill-s-1867-and-indefinite.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yQ93T8GuGqX42gXv4LS1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvb0h61WaQq0gKedfGW4DoVL_cFQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-07:/commentary/13971382</id>
    <updated>2011-12-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Marie-Theresa Hern&#225;ndez, PhD</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I would not have known anything about this but Anonymous posted a video on YouTube about the danger to American civil liberties should the bill be passed (S. 1867 was voted in by the Senate ). Not just believing what ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://dreamacttexas.blogspot.com/2011/12/senate-bill-s-1867-and-indefinite.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yQ93T8GuGqX42gXv4LS1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvb0h61WaQq0gKedfGW4DoVL_cFQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DREAM ACT - TEXAS: Senate Bill S. 1867 and the Indefinite ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://dreamacttexas.blogspot.com/2011/12/senate-bill-s-1867-and-indefinite.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cOZ2T968LYGO2AXnx5S2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvi9bSfg34WydwN095gqQ-s9eoFw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-07:/commentary/13967812</id>
    <updated>2011-12-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Marie-Theresa Hern&#225;ndez, PhD</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I would not have known anything about this but Anonymous posted a video on YouTube about the danger to American civil liberties should the bill be passed (S. 1867 was voted in by the Senate ). Not just believing what ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://dreamacttexas.blogspot.com/2011/12/senate-bill-s-1867-and-indefinite.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cOZ2T968LYGO2AXnx5S2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvi9bSfg34WydwN095gqQ-s9eoFw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DREAM ACT - TEXAS: Senate Bill S. 1867 and the Indefinite ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://dreamacttexas.blogspot.com/2011/12/senate-bill-s-1867-and-indefinite.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rLt2T6CCCqeq2QXW6ty1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFqRg1e3N-MfCTBVNHQLzBRneWWPA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-07:/commentary/13965276</id>
    <updated>2011-12-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Marie-Theresa Hern&#225;ndez, PhD</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I would not have known anything about this but Anonymous posted a video on YouTube about the danger to American civil liberties should the bill be passed (S. 1867 was voted in by the Senate ). Not just believing what ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://dreamacttexas.blogspot.com/2011/12/senate-bill-s-1867-and-indefinite.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rLt2T6CCCqeq2QXW6ty1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFqRg1e3N-MfCTBVNHQLzBRneWWPA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Amend S. 1867 to Prevent Indefinite Dete | Art for the Soul</title>
    <link href="http://shankargallery.wordpress.com/2011/12/07/amend-s-1867-to-prevent-indefinite-dete/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-07:/commentary/11486206</id>
    <updated>2011-12-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>shankargallery</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Amend S. 1867 to Prevent Indefinite Dete. Amend S. 1867 to Prevent Indefinite Detention of Americans! | Campaign for Liberty ... AllGov &#8211; News &#8211; Senate Bill Allows Indef &amp;middot; WNBTv Presents: S. 1867 is Treasonous as &#8594; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://shankargallery.wordpress.com/2011/12/07/amend-s-1867-to-prevent-indefinite-dete/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 + H.R. 1540 = 1984| The Post &amp;amp; Email</title>
    <link href="http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/12/07/s-1867-h-r-1540-1984/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-07:/commentary/11486179</id>
    <updated>2011-12-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sharon Rondeau</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Now the senators and congressmen in favor of this treacherous legislation are meeting in secret, according to the ACLU, to merge S. 1867 and H.R. 1540: &#8220;Their main focus? Legislation authorizing this president and all future ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/12/07/s-1867-h-r-1540-1984/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Why Obama Wants to Veto S.1867 | blogsense-by-barb</title>
    <link href="http://blogsensebybarb.wordpress.com/2011/12/07/why-obama-wants-to-veto-s-1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-07:/commentary/11484368</id>
    <updated>2011-12-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>blogsense-by-barb</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The now infamous Section 1031 of S. 1867 does not exclude U.S. citizens from those &#8220;covered persons&#8221; whom the President can have the military arrest and detain without charge or trial. In effect, S. 1867 suspends and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogsensebybarb.wordpress.com/2011/12/07/why-obama-wants-to-veto-s-1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Why Obama Wants to Veto S.1867 | Fellows | Art for the Soul</title>
    <link href="http://shankargallery.wordpress.com/2011/12/07/why-obama-wants-to-veto-s-1867-fellows/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-07:/commentary/11482732</id>
    <updated>2011-12-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>shankargallery</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Why Obama Wants to Veto S.1867 | Fellowship of the Minds http://ow.ly/7SbU6 .... WNBTv Presents: S. 1867 is Treasonous as Are its Authors | WNBTv - will not be televised http://ow.ly/7RVqQ. shankar gallery; Untitled ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://shankargallery.wordpress.com/2011/12/07/why-obama-wants-to-veto-s-1867-fellows/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Why Obama Wants to Veto S.1867 | Fellowship of the Minds</title>
    <link href="http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/12/07/why-obama-wants-to-veto-s-1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-07:/commentary/11482731</id>
    <updated>2011-12-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Dr. Eowyn</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The now infamous Section 1031 of S. 1867 does not exclude U.S. citizens from those &#8220;covered persons&#8221; whom the President can have the military arrest and detain without charge or trial. In effect, S. 1867 is a declaration of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/12/07/why-obama-wants-to-veto-s-1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DREAM ACT - TEXAS: Senate Bill S. 1867 and the Indefinite ...</title>
    <link href="http://dreamacttexas.blogspot.com/2011/12/senate-bill-s-1867-and-indefinite.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-07:/commentary/11479821</id>
    <updated>2011-12-07T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Marie-Theresa Hern&#225;ndez, PhD</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I would not have known anything about this but Anonymous posted a video on YouTube about the danger to American civil liberties should the bill be passed (S. 1867 was voted in by the Senate ). Not just believing what ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dreamacttexas.blogspot.com/2011/12/senate-bill-s-1867-and-indefinite.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Richard Mack Video: S.1867 Is Illegal</title>
    <link href="http://www.freedom-won.net/richard-mack-video-s-1867-is-illegal/533035/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-06:/commentary/11604210</id>
    <updated>2011-12-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>F-Won</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Sheriffs nation-wide are beginning to band together to stop the growing totalitarian American national government. jwplayer(&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freedom-won.net/richard-mack-video-s-1867-is-illegal/533035/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Battlefield U.S.A. (S. 1867 National Defense Authorization Act) on ...</title>
    <link href="http://johnconner1984.wordpress.com/2011/12/07/battlefield-u-s-a-s-1867-national-defense-authorization-act-on-freedomlink-radio/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-06:/commentary/11479225</id>
    <updated>2011-12-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>johnconner1984</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Don&amp;#39;t let the deceptive legal language deceive you! The compromise you&amp;#39;ve heard of was not a compromise at all. Listen to the show for some very important information regarding S. 1867 and what it means to you! ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://johnconner1984.wordpress.com/2011/12/07/battlefield-u-s-a-s-1867-national-defense-authorization-act-on-freedomlink-radio/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sen. Feinstein Confirms S. 1867&#8242;s Detention of U.S. Citizens w/out ...</title>
    <link href="http://grendelreport.posterous.com/sen-feinstein-confirms-s-1867s-detention-of-u" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-06:/commentary/11477618</id>
    <updated>2011-12-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://grendelreport.posterous.com/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
If you still have doubts that the recently passed Senate bill 1867 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012) is harmless, read this e-mail from Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif). S. 1867&amp;#39;s Sec. 1301 gives authority ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://grendelreport.posterous.com/sen-feinstein-confirms-s-1867s-detention-of-u&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Developing Direct Action Re: The National Defense Act (Bill S.1867 ...</title>
    <link href="http://interoccupy.org/developing-direct-action-re-the-national-defense-act-bill-s-1867-121412-from-the-indefinite-detention-state-wide-action-working-group-of-the-3rd-inter-occupational-meeting-of-michigan/?utm_source=rss&amp;amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;amp;utm_campaign=developing-direct-action-re-the-national-defense-act-bill-s-1867-121412-from-the-indefinite-detention-state-wide-action-working-group-of-the-3rd-inter-occupational-meeting-of-michigan" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-06:/commentary/11477616</id>
    <updated>2011-12-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>InterOccupy Admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Action against senators offices in support of S.1867.This action is currently slated as an Open interface, or &#8220;Blizzard strike protest&#8221; meaning to implement cooridnation of mulitple Occupations.. converging on 1 location. each ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://interoccupy.org/developing-direct-action-re-the-national-defense-act-bill-s-1867-121412-from-the-indefinite-detention-state-wide-action-working-group-of-the-3rd-inter-occupational-meeting-of-michigan/?utm_source=rss&amp;amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;amp;utm_campaign=developing-direct-action-re-the-national-defense-act-bill-s-1867-121412-from-the-indefinite-detention-state-wide-action-working-group-of-the-3rd-inter-occupational-meeting-of-michigan&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Podcast: Quintiliani on SOPA and S. 1867 - Repeal the 17th ...</title>
    <link href="http://repealthe17thamendment.blogspot.com/2011/12/podcast-quintiliani-on-sopa-and-s-1867.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-06:/commentary/11477585</id>
    <updated>2011-12-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Brian</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Host Brian Duffy interviewed long time Repeal the 17th Discussion Board contributor Dan Quintiliani concerning the current legislation being pushed in the US Senate, SOPA and S.1867, both of which have far reaching ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://repealthe17thamendment.blogspot.com/2011/12/podcast-quintiliani-on-sopa-and-s-1867.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S1867: Bad vs. Good Senators | Fellowship of the Minds</title>
    <link href="http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/12/06/s1867-bad-vs-good-senators/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-06:/commentary/11476417</id>
    <updated>2011-12-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Dr. Eowyn</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Last Thursday, December 1, 2011, by an overwhelming majority vote of 93 vs. 7, the U.S. Senate passed S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. In so doing, the Senate gives authority to the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/12/06/s1867-bad-vs-good-senators/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sen. Feinstein Confirms S. 1867&#8242;s Detention of U.S. Citizens w/out ...</title>
    <link href="http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/12/06/sen-feinstein-confirms-s-1867s-detention-of-u-s-citizens-wout-trial/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-06:/commentary/11473478</id>
    <updated>2011-12-06T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Dr. Eowyn</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Dianne Feinstein. If you still have doubts that the recently passed Senate bill 1867 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012) is harmless, read this e-mail from Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif). S. 1867&#8242;s Sec. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/12/06/sen-feinstein-confirms-s-1867s-detention-of-u-s-citizens-wout-trial/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>POPVOX - Defense Authorization Bills (S. 1867) and (HR 1540 ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.popvox.com/blog/2011/defense-authorization-bills-s-1867-and-hr-1540-hea/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-05:/commentary/11473233</id>
    <updated>2011-12-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>marci</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Defense Authorization Bill, S. 1867, generated a lot of buzz last week. The bill passed the Senate and now heads to conference with the House (merging with H.R.1540). The resulting conferenced bill will go back to both ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.popvox.com/blog/2011/defense-authorization-bills-s-1867-and-hr-1540-hea/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The entire United States is now a war zone: S.1867 passes the ...</title>
    <link href="http://potentnews.wordpress.com/2011/12/05/the-entire-united-states-is-now-a-war-zone-s-1867-passes-the-senate-with-massive-support/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-05:/commentary/11472659</id>
    <updated>2011-12-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Amir</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As I have detailed in two past articles entitled Do not be deceived: S.1867 is the most dangerous bill since the PATRIOT Act and S.1253 will allow indefinite military detention of American civilians without charge or trial, the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://potentnews.wordpress.com/2011/12/05/the-entire-united-states-is-now-a-war-zone-s-1867-passes-the-senate-with-massive-support/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 + H.R. 1540 = 1984 &#171; Doretta Wildes</title>
    <link href="http://dorettawildes.wordpress.com/2011/12/06/s-1867-h-r-1540-1984/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-05:/commentary/11471290</id>
    <updated>2011-12-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Doretta Wildes</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Keep in mind that our Connecticut senators, Lieberman and Blumenthal, both signed S. 1867. This is a very bad sign. However, perhaps one of them can be brought to his senses. The other long ago struck a deal with the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dorettawildes.wordpress.com/2011/12/06/s-1867-h-r-1540-1984/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Occupy Las Vegas - Press Release Regarding S.1867</title>
    <link href="http://indigosociety.com/showthread.php?48934-Occupy-Las-Vegas-Press-Release-Regarding-S-1867" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-05:/commentary/11471289</id>
    <updated>2011-12-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Greenguy</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I am going to post this groups press release here because I have a feeling that the media is not going to release it (at least not mainstream)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://indigosociety.com/showthread.php?48934-Occupy-Las-Vegas-Press-Release-Regarding-S-1867&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Throw Every Senator Who Voted For S.1867 NDAA OUT OF OFFICE ...</title>
    <link href="http://overmanwarrior.wordpress.com/2011/12/06/throw-every-senator-who-voted-for-s-1867-ndaa-out-of-office-rule-by-fools/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-05:/commentary/11471276</id>
    <updated>2011-12-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>overmanwarrior</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In the following broadcast Darryl covers the sudden fix for the Cincinnati budget deficit and explains how the smoke and mirror game works. Then he talks about the epic tragedy of S.1867 NDAA. Click the video below to listen ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://overmanwarrior.wordpress.com/2011/12/06/throw-every-senator-who-voted-for-s-1867-ndaa-out-of-office-rule-by-fools/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The entire United States is now a war zone: S.1867 passes the ...</title>
    <link href="http://nwotruth.com/the-entire-united-states-is-now-a-war-zone-s-1867-passes-the-senate-with-massive-support-2/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-05:/commentary/11471275</id>
    <updated>2011-12-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NWOTruth</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As I have detailed in two past articles entitled Do not be deceived: S.1867 is the most dangerous bill since the PATRIOT Act and S.1253 will allow indefinite military detention of American civilians without charge or trial, the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nwotruth.com/the-entire-united-states-is-now-a-war-zone-s-1867-passes-the-senate-with-massive-support-2/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>MPL Gov Info: S. 1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal ...</title>
    <link href="http://mplgovinfo.blogspot.com/2011/12/s-1867-national-defense-authorization.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-05:/commentary/11470448</id>
    <updated>2011-12-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>noreply@blogger.com (RDmpl)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&amp;quot;S. 1867 would authorize appropriations totaling $662 billion for fiscal year 2012 for the military functions of the Department of Defense (DoD), for certain activities of the. Department of Energy (DOE), and for other purposes ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mplgovinfo.blogspot.com/2011/12/s-1867-national-defense-authorization.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Vatic Project: Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within</title>
    <link href="http://vaticproject.blogspot.com/2011/12/passage-of-s1867-our-enemy-is-within.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-05:/commentary/11467845</id>
    <updated>2011-12-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>M. C. Bruecke</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://vaticproject.blogspot.com/2011/12/passage-of-s1867-our-enemy-is-within.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S 1867: Killing The Bill of Rights and Declaring War on Americans ...</title>
    <link href="http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2011/12/04/s-1867-killing-the-bill-of-rights-and-declaring-war-on-americans-by-tim-gatto/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-04:/commentary/11462465</id>
    <updated>2011-12-04T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>dandelionsalad</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The information about this bill, S.1867, is conflicting. According to &#8220;Wired&#8221;: &#8220;Here&amp;#39;s the best thing that can be said about the new detention powers the Senate has tucked into next year&amp;#39;s defense bill: They don&amp;#39;t force the military ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2011/12/04/s-1867-killing-the-bill-of-rights-and-declaring-war-on-americans-by-tim-gatto/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>In tweeted conversations about S. 1867, who listened to whom ...</title>
    <link href="http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2011/12/04/in-conversations-about-s-1867-who-listened-to-whom-tweet-network/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-04:/commentary/11450773</id>
    <updated>2011-12-04T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Congressional Aid</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Last week, the U.S. Senate passed S. 1867, a military authorization bill with a special provision granting the U.S. military the power to put people into detention without charges and without any time limit. All classes of people ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2011/12/04/in-conversations-about-s-1867-who-listened-to-whom-tweet-network/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867 The Prelude To War</title>
    <link href="http://www.freedom-won.net/s-1867-the-prelude-to-war/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-03:/commentary/11444783</id>
    <updated>2011-12-03T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>F-Won</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
If you need more money, read this. It is increasingly likely that war is on the agenda for Christmas. If...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freedom-won.net/s-1867-the-prelude-to-war/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Exposed: S.1867 - America&amp;#39;s Final Solution</title>
    <link href="http://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/2011/12/s1867-americas-final-solution.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-03:/commentary/11432027</id>
    <updated>2011-12-03T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mary Neal</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - America&amp;#39;s Final Solution. My thoughts about Senate Bill 1867 are expressed in the tweets below. Check back at this blog for historic events during the year 1867. Interestingly, on January 8, 1867, a law was passed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/2011/12/s1867-americas-final-solution.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate passed controversial S. 1867 bill that may give President ...</title>
    <link href="http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/12/03/senate-passed-controversial-s-1867-bill-that-may-give-president-power-to-arrest-u-s-citizens-wout-trial/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-03:/commentary/11432005</id>
    <updated>2011-12-03T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Dr. Eowyn</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On Thursday, December 1, while we were busily tearing at each other about what the language of Sections 1031-1032 of Senate bill 1867 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012) means &#8212; whether or not the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/12/03/senate-passed-controversial-s-1867-bill-that-may-give-president-power-to-arrest-u-s-citizens-wout-trial/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IdGMT_7kEorF2QWnreCWDA&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGrdd8s3hEUkZmz4JYevINmncdRNA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14519192</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IdGMT_7kEorF2QWnreCWDA&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGrdd8s3hEUkZmz4JYevINmncdRNA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sKaMT5X0GOje2QXymI25CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmuM-gOKeX-lcyNqi_FI0Gj3cFyA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14515658</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sKaMT5X0GOje2QXymI25CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmuM-gOKeX-lcyNqi_FI0Gj3cFyA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jHyMT9O6E8PQ2AXryojCCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHT58_IDFSH9fwqB9uOgr4If5URiw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14511864</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jHyMT9O6E8PQ2AXryojCCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHT58_IDFSH9fwqB9uOgr4If5URiw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rFKMT5j8OKLe2AXTt5jVCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEi2Xlh43z7RdIsr9WnfzNU1aZ7tQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14506144</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rFKMT5j8OKLe2AXTt5jVCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEi2Xlh43z7RdIsr9WnfzNU1aZ7tQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qjiMT9-iN-fg2wXj-9HGCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYBw7morEfdqy-I9sr1aiFrm5akA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14499996</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qjiMT9-iN-fg2wXj-9HGCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYBw7morEfdqy-I9sr1aiFrm5akA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LiiMT_uUF6Kg2gWsx7zICQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHdIMY0O8apGgjgRC6VIojWzXISvw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14499057</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LiiMT_uUF6Kg2gWsx7zICQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHdIMY0O8apGgjgRC6VIojWzXISvw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aQCMT9gWpszYBce9mM4J&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEYUwYXnPkzFiWqEFFP7eY4CUbQzA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14496811</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aQCMT9gWpszYBce9mM4J&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEYUwYXnPkzFiWqEFFP7eY4CUbQzA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0tWLT-WMF8Go2wXcrt3MCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQZ8cllSsaqU5T8HDdkBnjvYAPkg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14494127</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0tWLT-WMF8Go2wXcrt3MCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQZ8cllSsaqU5T8HDdkBnjvYAPkg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zy6KT6eoNaKK2wXvr9HHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFViCHiuRyg2TdfCJ2FVgLXVBiVdA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14443807</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zy6KT6eoNaKK2wXvr9HHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFViCHiuRyg2TdfCJ2FVgLXVBiVdA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9mJT42cCaeq2QXf1fzYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNENNefmG7An1XELy0xM-tGvyFPCUg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14436577</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9mJT42cCaeq2QXf1fzYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNENNefmG7An1XELy0xM-tGvyFPCUg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=u6-JT83_F8TS2QXV79TmCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlPmJ0d1fKaIxjIam1z1JM2Lt_9w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14431569</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=u6-JT83_F8TS2QXV79TmCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlPmJ0d1fKaIxjIam1z1JM2Lt_9w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QYWJT5S_AYPs2QW6uM3cCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEA_SgW7i2OE_-QIGT5k8q8tTTfGA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14422963</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QYWJT5S_AYPs2QW6uM3cCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEA_SgW7i2OE_-QIGT5k8q8tTTfGA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O1yJT9L4IIei2QXTpJXrCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFU3V_KLotpyTsA6F1jrgQLQ_TSFA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14420477</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O1yJT9L4IIei2QXTpJXrCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFU3V_KLotpyTsA6F1jrgQLQ_TSFA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AzGJT_nLEqfO2gXo-p2zCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFOi9RE8MpcXlLhXixlrIy2D1VwEw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14417910</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AzGJT_nLEqfO2gXo-p2zCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFOi9RE8MpcXlLhXixlrIy2D1VwEw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cAaJT_-sLMPu2gWxnf26CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVnvNdTB56g4ApuGj_0ukDLEbLtw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14416415</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cAaJT_-sLMPu2gWxnf26CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVnvNdTB56g4ApuGj_0ukDLEbLtw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VNyIT4fYHbKHsALCwrjTCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSz2E4lj9p5y4ZRKkF1W-gwv8TBA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14412978</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VNyIT4fYHbKHsALCwrjTCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSz2E4lj9p5y4ZRKkF1W-gwv8TBA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NLKIT5nKIqfD2QXPt6WsDA&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF6ssjfvgXvWbzvVlJZigalilDKDg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14412879</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NLKIT5nKIqfD2QXPt6WsDA&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF6ssjfvgXvWbzvVlJZigalilDKDg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1oeIT7TWJsqOqgHvz4yIDA&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG_lqOXiUXCzM_1t9jBM6D9ViSrog" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14412772</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1oeIT7TWJsqOqgHvz4yIDA&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG_lqOXiUXCzM_1t9jBM6D9ViSrog&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjOIT9eiBILi2QXnhdzcCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFb2PFOcgxrXIAX8-SpZ1alXw8wFw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14407405</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjOIT9eiBILi2QXnhdzcCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFb2PFOcgxrXIAX8-SpZ1alXw8wFw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GLWHT-K_OpKc8gTRiNzvCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_o9EesULLkUz5FDWZLquvd1Y3pg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14402618</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GLWHT-K_OpKc8gTRiNzvCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_o9EesULLkUz5FDWZLquvd1Y3pg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mTaHT8HKKKa18AGB5fWwCA&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSuzTY_ggGNazIQW_wboStLO4tYg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14386225</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mTaHT8HKKKa18AGB5fWwCA&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSuzTY_ggGNazIQW_wboStLO4tYg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jgyHT-SZJeaJ8AGl58CeCA&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFtY27jv190I8_UHS35yBN9SSEL9Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14380221</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jgyHT-SZJeaJ8AGl58CeCA&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFtY27jv190I8_UHS35yBN9SSEL9Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tLiGT-7LAuW-8AHApPXCCA&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFspwBRSHrtIunf7dHR3ayS6zcxWg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14371468</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tLiGT-7LAuW-8AHApPXCCA&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFspwBRSHrtIunf7dHR3ayS6zcxWg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fI-GT-CMBKeG8AHoz92TCA&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE2xLViy2JuwiPAI7CTmNFs72uQjA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14369363</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fI-GT-CMBKeG8AHoz92TCA&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE2xLViy2JuwiPAI7CTmNFs72uQjA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nWOGT7-IHoGG8AGRxLi3CA&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYW12LI7IAbL3TBeQAejczol53nQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14367103</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nWOGT7-IHoGG8AGRxLi3CA&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYW12LI7IAbL3TBeQAejczol53nQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzmGT_abN6qi2QW116mLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH6-Ha0qr9EEODbrOEMRVlK-44W0w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14357473</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzmGT_abN6qi2QW116mLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH6-Ha0qr9EEODbrOEMRVlK-44W0w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IQ-GT86BJebW2gW-nb2ICQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGT5CHOueSR9mO_QrHZG3D_rGYfLg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14353984</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IQ-GT86BJebW2gW-nb2ICQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGT5CHOueSR9mO_QrHZG3D_rGYfLg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GuWFT-W8MIrW2AW-xrDeDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHCrqrnjV55N7Q_H-mmwN2jjsUd-A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14350075</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GuWFT-W8MIrW2AW-xrDeDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHCrqrnjV55N7Q_H-mmwN2jjsUd-A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ALuFT_GHOq2I8gH51NW-CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECgsUfZ4xcmCcbQhLrs5czyCWXTA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14344711</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ALuFT_GHOq2I8gH51NW-CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECgsUfZ4xcmCcbQhLrs5czyCWXTA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3JqFT52CDuOh2QWO8tWNCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0l0a9jC413T4svVN-5qq46gwhLg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14337335</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3JqFT52CDuOh2QWO8tWNCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0l0a9jC413T4svVN-5qq46gwhLg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2JCFT7GhL5OA2AXzjN33CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMCq3Q6JFky5_hNU9AmIi7rjGaGA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14336501</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2JCFT7GhL5OA2AXzjN33CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMCq3Q6JFky5_hNU9AmIi7rjGaGA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wmeFT5blHsGo2wXS5fD5CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHEMvtW-5urZ218W1efav6ZJQO_Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14333877</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wmeFT5blHsGo2wXS5fD5CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHEMvtW-5urZ218W1efav6ZJQO_Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wT2FT_CdHOKt8AGV4NSXCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHOAYq3dNQZusl0DzXPLxggRE7gZg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14331359</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wT2FT_CdHOKt8AGV4NSXCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHOAYq3dNQZusl0DzXPLxggRE7gZg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JRKFT5eBM8fC2wWC1d3hCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbGlL2n_-YRYssoUyDf7X60SI0-Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14328502</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JRKFT5eBM8fC2wWC1d3hCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbGlL2n_-YRYssoUyDf7X60SI0-Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3OeET5bOAaGM2gXfsoiLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH3M_70Zed04NZsJzo0yejoi-ivKw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14318445</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3OeET5bOAaGM2gXfsoiLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH3M_70Zed04NZsJzo0yejoi-ivKw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sL2ET5WUEIKa2gXj0KCdCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlzzkXbsvH6FB1PvENtq7BOgQvbw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14314831</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sL2ET5WUEIKa2gXj0KCdCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlzzkXbsvH6FB1PvENtq7BOgQvbw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aJOET_-CA4jq8wTk_IjECA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9-THF5qV8RyDzqD54LzrIIUcNNw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14311169</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aJOET_-CA4jq8wTk_IjECA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9-THF5qV8RyDzqD54LzrIIUcNNw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=c2mET_r3FO--2AW98KziCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFos33EZMEh29hq5qVh2qm9vAXKJw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14306174</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=c2mET_r3FO--2AW98KziCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFos33EZMEh29hq5qVh2qm9vAXKJw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mk2ET5yCK4KL2AWIusyCCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGGRBp1-hjPMP7Ko-WErXs7E6Mwwg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14298896</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mk2ET5yCK4KL2AWIusyCCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGGRBp1-hjPMP7Ko-WErXs7E6Mwwg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pj-ET-aQGObc2QWv78HiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGwdILBEFYCF6veM0HG6qhQRhzzcw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14298078</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pj-ET-aQGObc2QWv78HiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGwdILBEFYCF6veM0HG6qhQRhzzcw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9BaET_e9AoLc2gXVrOH0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEW6E3mtQeJF7_Z1FaymihSYMSB_w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14295585</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9BaET_e9AoLc2gXVrOH0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEW6E3mtQeJF7_Z1FaymihSYMSB_w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=226CT767O-mo2wXQ1bD6Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE39NKBL0901HU2sn61EqdPLU7ixw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14276410</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=226CT767O-mo2wXQ1bD6Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE39NKBL0901HU2sn61EqdPLU7ixw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r0SCT7PCEOfM2gWbpYziBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXrm_qXJvlJAIvgLZlYR9uhLUmhQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14267417</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r0SCT7PCEOfM2gWbpYziBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXrm_qXJvlJAIvgLZlYR9uhLUmhQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cRqCT5GpAYHG2wXaiLycBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGEBX9A98PNttCgi4HHWmz0BjKw4Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14264109</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cRqCT5GpAYHG2wXaiLycBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGEBX9A98PNttCgi4HHWmz0BjKw4Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QPCBT8bvJOTi2AXxgoWKBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcyz87pXEYQCcOzeb9TialS5aCeA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14259715</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QPCBT8bvJOTi2AXxgoWKBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcyz87pXEYQCcOzeb9TialS5aCeA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HMaBT_KwA4q62wXpuJHlBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsZTfdQrC8sGxtdT0wmdLL9esniQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14254782</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HMaBT_KwA4q62wXpuJHlBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsZTfdQrC8sGxtdT0wmdLL9esniQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jaKBT4itJOTi2AXxgoWKBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE60x1COrQrtCT2BJxBNZr7a2eUKA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14246525</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jaKBT4itJOTi2AXxgoWKBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE60x1COrQrtCT2BJxBNZr7a2eUKA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-5uBT9nDK6Lo2AXwwdz9Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFBlYl1u4dc_0JufBJV5NHYUwqoMA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14245949</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-5uBT9nDK6Lo2AXwwdz9Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFBlYl1u4dc_0JufBJV5NHYUwqoMA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cXKBT8T8G4ew2QWJo4mGBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9CFxU_-ev1lPPIg2x4LIMXVEHVQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14243180</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cXKBT8T8G4ew2QWJo4mGBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9CFxU_-ev1lPPIg2x4LIMXVEHVQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=H0mBT-X2IcTm2QW95aXpBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQYPUMPsxb_s8H6K97JrmAYxA72g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14240601</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=H0mBT-X2IcTm2QW95aXpBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQYPUMPsxb_s8H6K97JrmAYxA72g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XB2BT8aNO-Lg2gWNw-ibCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEPGOXtcHEWvRN7VxmhpSLLSuX9PQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14238507</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XB2BT8aNO-Lg2gWNw-ibCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEPGOXtcHEWvRN7VxmhpSLLSuX9PQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wvOAT9TwCMTe2QXA0pzvBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGS0cHNAUFCAXRV5eezdOlc_fMf0Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14229487</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wvOAT9TwCMTe2QXA0pzvBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGS0cHNAUFCAXRV5eezdOlc_fMf0Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_8iAT6DoLeSa2AWbgYGIBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvS_ROk4w4JxMP-i-UY5eDeGzXog" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14226141</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_8iAT6DoLeSa2AWbgYGIBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvS_ROk4w4JxMP-i-UY5eDeGzXog&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1J6AT51f5erZBZmYxYoH&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-U9FTuT7SLG44-DdQkfhabnLqUg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14222029</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1J6AT51f5erZBZmYxYoH&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-U9FTuT7SLG44-DdQkfhabnLqUg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U3WAT6CsPIfY2QXL-aD4Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEeP04WDB54j0hBxCdKOioOIKissA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14216776</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U3WAT6CsPIfY2QXL-aD4Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEeP04WDB54j0hBxCdKOioOIKissA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1FCAT8OEB8fC2wWx9eiPBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEh2VS_ml4C9pDVNG92x93DrwQWRA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14209601</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1FCAT8OEB8fC2wWx9eiPBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEh2VS_ml4C9pDVNG92x93DrwQWRA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZEqAT4jwC8GC2AWy88CSBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjLgArX2I6v6IcOg_wM4InMdbmpw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14208985</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZEqAT4jwC8GC2AWy88CSBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjLgArX2I6v6IcOg_wM4InMdbmpw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VCKAT-HuEYTy2QWHhODvBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFY4KPp3c32VgNCjstIR_p54h1NfA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14206161</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VCKAT-HuEYTy2QWHhODvBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFY4KPp3c32VgNCjstIR_p54h1NfA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tfZ_T6OmJIag2QWqxb3kBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGtd6UHOWfLrMNBjirNWm289qH0oQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14203713</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tfZ_T6OmJIag2QWqxb3kBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGtd6UHOWfLrMNBjirNWm289qH0oQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z8t_T6WoA4-SgQei9dCBCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEyW8K24zMw5l6arJ4RaU34_JcXBw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14200067</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z8t_T6WoA4-SgQei9dCBCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEyW8K24zMw5l6arJ4RaU34_JcXBw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zqF_T431MqGM2gWVyNH6Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_yApi2Us2mOOb7aoH2oLcEMJLiA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14190582</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zqF_T431MqGM2gWVyNH6Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_yApi2Us2mOOb7aoH2oLcEMJLiA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=X3d_T_XoEemY2wWKsLCLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTey_t3LUFsChEy6oB1DO5-9tSrw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14187112</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=X3d_T_XoEemY2wWKsLCLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTey_t3LUFsChEy6oB1DO5-9tSrw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QE1_T87oDoiS9QSU0PjqBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF75_qdvBqFwlMDZxPWY2HeoncEfw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14183740</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QE1_T87oDoiS9QSU0PjqBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF75_qdvBqFwlMDZxPWY2HeoncEfw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DyR_T8_0JKa42wXlwKWFBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEZ_y71dyjCGYtAWO2vaS_F-C0RwQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14177981</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DyR_T8_0JKa42wXlwKWFBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEZ_y71dyjCGYtAWO2vaS_F-C0RwQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pgt_T6uVLYOm8gSXv6HcBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJVUj0UNRT_o3RNdrVrqFWfJM78A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14171786</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pgt_T6uVLYOm8gSXv6HcBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJVUj0UNRT_o3RNdrVrqFWfJM78A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8vh-T5-qOLPE2QWCvYTnBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEQaPrdgA-2kYWEni1ft_9NApze1A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14170835</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8vh-T5-qOLPE2QWCvYTnBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEQaPrdgA-2kYWEni1ft_9NApze1A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=585-T_OfIoOq2QXxtrzoBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGN_-x5CXs354bHolQOuAFxGtLAew" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14168247</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=585-T_OfIoOq2QXxtrzoBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGN_-x5CXs354bHolQOuAFxGtLAew&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yaR-T5HOB8WU2QXvpOCLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNdrIm_QEhmKmFfn5MjyFNnneOdA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14165842</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yaR-T5HOB8WU2QXvpOCLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNdrIm_QEhmKmFfn5MjyFNnneOdA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pnp-T8GfLIqE8ASkrNTKBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEV3CuXlbLeRI-sNldDy5UEVgo7aA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14164755</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pnp-T8GfLIqE8ASkrNTKBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEV3CuXlbLeRI-sNldDy5UEVgo7aA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EVB-T9qmIYGg9QT8nIm3Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2uI9LeSzfld-Sg0R7VouZuPrIXQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14155727</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EVB-T9qmIYGg9QT8nIm3Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2uI9LeSzfld-Sg0R7VouZuPrIXQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1CV-T5XrM4Ki8QSd5pSNDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjaXHir8r7JO6LfdftpkX6NZSetA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14152119</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1CV-T5XrM4Ki8QSd5pSNDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjaXHir8r7JO6LfdftpkX6NZSetA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oft9T2WTgvEEmvmNiQ4&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZgKjnPNIlUNHmnHZ1ZzL9SPQzuQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14147580</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oft9T2WTgvEEmvmNiQ4&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZgKjnPNIlUNHmnHZ1ZzL9SPQzuQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hNF9T5--M4Lc9AT6zJ2hDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVsNGuGfMSWPPjmHQoASYnAAMsBA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14140882</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hNF9T5--M4Lc9AT6zJ2hDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVsNGuGfMSWPPjmHQoASYnAAMsBA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Qad9T5TBH4nI2AXm05z0DA&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFp3KDpub3Z-wcaJqATBZqN_5AaUw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14133830</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Qad9T5TBH4nI2AXm05z0DA&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFp3KDpub3Z-wcaJqATBZqN_5AaUw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4qJ9T4aHDuqi2gWnsbGHDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLfYUlGFi346MzLDZYLtW2oNUOyQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14133340</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4qJ9T4aHDuqi2gWnsbGHDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLfYUlGFi346MzLDZYLtW2oNUOyQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-H99T8vJOcOO2wX3jbXkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzqGWrlhBwfWMGFDhrST5wxe4CwQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14130386</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-H99T8vJOcOO2wX3jbXkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzqGWrlhBwfWMGFDhrST5wxe4CwQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QVN9T-eGD8GC2AWZ6rmADQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9NX-RAIZ8zjMvqTjmey6H4Sei8w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14127623</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QVN9T-eGD8GC2AWZ6rmADQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9NX-RAIZ8zjMvqTjmey6H4Sei8w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tCh9T6DQL-bc2QWwhPiKDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvWxcLJmBER1i1o7Jtj3WvTMdUSw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14125629</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tCh9T6DQL-bc2QWwhPiKDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvWxcLJmBER1i1o7Jtj3WvTMdUSw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jf58T7rbCY-c8QTiwsSKDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZxJ-cuJquTzJ_e51yKHNC5wVFAg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14115982</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jf58T7rbCY-c8QTiwsSKDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZxJ-cuJquTzJ_e51yKHNC5wVFAg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pNR8T8zNB4PO9ASdodmiDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6qCQhzeE8CqlnLqFjZrggEZXLqQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14112866</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pNR8T8zNB4PO9ASdodmiDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6qCQhzeE8CqlnLqFjZrggEZXLqQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=H6p8T72sLKnM2AXg5Y3aDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGbSuThijeOtDWLAwrzyPUYzyUPBw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14109083</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=H6p8T72sLKnM2AXg5Y3aDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGbSuThijeOtDWLAwrzyPUYzyUPBw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HIB8T-f7NKrM2AWltfHVDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFSDzPX2T86z8Qf03NZyDkXtb8qQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14104175</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HIB8T-f7NKrM2AWltfHVDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFSDzPX2T86z8Qf03NZyDkXtb8qQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=u1d8T6u9G-eW2AW7vL3bDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFiA9jEQIimMi1uAmW6QeqD8wgTBA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14094836</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=u1d8T6u9G-eW2AW7vL3bDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFiA9jEQIimMi1uAmW6QeqD8wgTBA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wFV8T4bWCKaC2AXKhcjRDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHA80aQelU2lHNi42uesPZ93lTbhw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14094572</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wFV8T4bWCKaC2AXKhcjRDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHA80aQelU2lHNi42uesPZ93lTbhw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PCx8T4mADsGo2wXP6tHeDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGpXP30nBNL90bQqHuZ9Ai85ebCaw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14091346</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PCx8T4mADsGo2wXP6tHeDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGpXP30nBNL90bQqHuZ9Ai85ebCaw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RAJ8T6O_Jcng2QWt_53cDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJDpkL2l1HV6i7bFWHQN1XmaIAag" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14088972</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RAJ8T6O_Jcng2QWt_53cDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJDpkL2l1HV6i7bFWHQN1XmaIAag&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Qdd7T-XIF8fC2wW6gKnrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGRE4ID2_3EYpC9-H-U5nQWHUR6VA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14087897</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Qdd7T-XIF8fC2wW6gKnrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGRE4ID2_3EYpC9-H-U5nQWHUR6VA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Bq17T_-2J8TC2wWMjcGfAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvYMmsIyGleo-FDQdcvt6hbkPinQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14084107</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Bq17T_-2J8TC2wWMjcGfAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvYMmsIyGleo-FDQdcvt6hbkPinQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wIJ7T6DvM4my2QWCvvmsAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5xkKKbFxh9xIoqEsKbWAMbz3cYA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14083990</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wIJ7T6DvM4my2QWCvvmsAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5xkKKbFxh9xIoqEsKbWAMbz3cYA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rlh7T63HMvSCsAL09KmJAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERk6NZXeLkE1UNUnefUeXK_SpDog" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14083871</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rlh7T63HMvSCsAL09KmJAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERk6NZXeLkE1UNUnefUeXK_SpDog&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=di57T5P2LurM2gXXqYCGAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGgV-nGydaFFzCxlrw3-9dze6IqYg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14082827</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=di57T5P2LurM2gXXqYCGAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGgV-nGydaFFzCxlrw3-9dze6IqYg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XQR7T77wFYqGsAK16ZGTAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0KugbvGvVQurSJ-X2cZDc1eCn3w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14077096</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XQR7T77wFYqGsAK16ZGTAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0KugbvGvVQurSJ-X2cZDc1eCn3w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vNp6T7DPG-vMsQKepcH8Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1UBmXK81xRnyudvxTpHhWHJ0yyA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14076355</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vNp6T7DPG-vMsQKepcH8Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1UBmXK81xRnyudvxTpHhWHJ0yyA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cLF6T_3UNaHKsQL02-D8Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0DABQLp0yleCgmch2PcJA5Mnbpw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14074791</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cLF6T_3UNaHKsQL02-D8Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0DABQLp0yleCgmch2PcJA5Mnbpw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wYV6T9mMH9P82gW7q7CqAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_JEW1M9jn22m9heHoDz-kMjxpPQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14070977</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wYV6T9mMH9P82gW7q7CqAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_JEW1M9jn22m9heHoDz-kMjxpPQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pFt6T9m-Gon02QWEvsyfAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzeQLzBc8rAImEDFPNp09geyQfpA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14061846</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pFt6T9m-Gon02QWEvsyfAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzeQLzBc8rAImEDFPNp09geyQfpA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bzF6T-qxNYrgsQLZ3Oj0Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG65KpVY7C7iyALUqzRJldx-2wslg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14059204</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bzF6T-qxNYrgsQLZ3Oj0Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG65KpVY7C7iyALUqzRJldx-2wslg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Twd6T6CaH4ei2wXSvs21Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHUPqK3CUxqwgFJykizkcrnqatf_A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14056339</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Twd6T6CaH4ei2wXSvs21Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHUPqK3CUxqwgFJykizkcrnqatf_A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C915T_CzI6OYsQK3gsxp&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHehpy01aROKIny1X-DA9JIz2A_iA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14051765</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C915T_CzI6OYsQK3gsxp&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHehpy01aROKIny1X-DA9JIz2A_iA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XcJ5T4qKNYfm2QXnxLS2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8DQz2xMyAQGY7n-_mSOEEizURFg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14045385</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XcJ5T4qKNYfm2QXnxLS2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8DQz2xMyAQGY7n-_mSOEEizURFg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6rJ5T9_dFOTi2AWd2u21Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3LvIvKfTsd6Ss-ahrVJXbOQUpcQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14044605</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6rJ5T9_dFOTi2AWd2u21Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3LvIvKfTsd6Ss-ahrVJXbOQUpcQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=w4h5T4vZHqOFsgLmrcihBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGY4kTJtRb7khJn1VELSCDarLgRqQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14041812</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=w4h5T4vZHqOFsgLmrcihBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGY4kTJtRb7khJn1VELSCDarLgRqQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gV55T7jJHoSDsgLv8pmiBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGol69OEpuenbuI7mzFknpGjMTuEw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14039703</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gV55T7jJHoSDsgLv8pmiBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGol69OEpuenbuI7mzFknpGjMTuEw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OTR5T__eFO3KsQLutfGhBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-43-usSqcKXE08FFhvQb5FWq37g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14038677</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OTR5T__eFO3KsQLutfGhBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-43-usSqcKXE08FFhvQb5FWq37g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Dgp5T5y3LY_KsQKLm4SiBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGeCbMFmkNXDO6LcHXSlIkcvX_wIQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14031268</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Dgp5T5y3LY_KsQKLm4SiBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGeCbMFmkNXDO6LcHXSlIkcvX_wIQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5d94T5b2O6yK2QWN2eC1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHJCervAKjSiqzx5cfgLRbuu6K_Iw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14027984</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5d94T5b2O6yK2QWN2eC1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHJCervAKjSiqzx5cfgLRbuu6K_Iw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uLV4T_2vJMma2gWMwZS2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHyWuOnmTQuHQnu7XC34E9i7DQe2w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14023175</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uLV4T_2vJMma2gWMwZS2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHyWuOnmTQuHQnu7XC34E9i7DQe2w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fIt4T7PpB6PL2QWBr8y1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzBfvK55XhhTxLLcS4bOui1p56qg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14018022</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fIt4T7PpB6PL2QWBr8y1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzBfvK55XhhTxLLcS4bOui1p56qg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M2J4T7bcLcbF2QWr_Yi3Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHgYHCx7MPzsOMQYg1FvUTSMWQiBg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14008560</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M2J4T7bcLcbF2QWr_Yi3Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHgYHCx7MPzsOMQYg1FvUTSMWQiBg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=T2F4T6qBEaLo2QXF2cy2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEqAQMbTX-J4S2zWcamf7ReivIhgQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14008393</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=T2F4T6qBEaLo2QXF2cy2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEqAQMbTX-J4S2zWcamf7ReivIhgQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FDh4T5iPEoHL2QXNoPC1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHAuvYxmiYrXkCxqIVLqrxp2P6sgg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14005069</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FDh4T5iPEoHL2QXNoPC1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHAuvYxmiYrXkCxqIVLqrxp2P6sgg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pg94T5TiHIGK2gXWocm1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFUz5uKIqpaQAQM5wsVmtifkG2B1Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14002792</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pg94T5TiHIGK2gXWocm1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFUz5uKIqpaQAQM5wsVmtifkG2B1Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zuJ3T_DMNMT-sQKM9cChBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHJEZGja5aST4IzdLK2AxUQrvnwEA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/14001744</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zuJ3T_DMNMT-sQKM9cChBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHJEZGja5aST4IzdLK2AxUQrvnwEA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4bh3T_GpF8-msALfhuSgBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH-CAqKszu_r2W4TFqz9jfhJUNrUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13993997</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4bh3T_GpF8-msALfhuSgBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH-CAqKszu_r2W4TFqz9jfhJUNrUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WY53T_uyJuGssQKu58SBBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHa-2OQleeuqnYLxM-5_iaSVGd2QQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13990405</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WY53T_uyJuGssQKu58SBBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHa-2OQleeuqnYLxM-5_iaSVGd2QQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LmR3T7CQLseysAK3yNmlBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXlLmHDFaYrp1jEbSY-RW8R5UzKg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13985800</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LmR3T7CQLseysAK3yNmlBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXlLmHDFaYrp1jEbSY-RW8R5UzKg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_zl3T4CvFuKysgKRvcShBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH88046Sy3V_FlHhHrQisF_9jPQ1Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13980828</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_zl3T4CvFuKysgKRvcShBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH88046Sy3V_FlHhHrQisF_9jPQ1Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nwx3T9mwG7SEsgLXjNGiBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8bc-j3Onubqq7uXz7ul5r1bC-Hw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13971009</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nwx3T9mwG7SEsgLXjNGiBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8bc-j3Onubqq7uXz7ul5r1bC-Hw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cOZ2T968LYGO2AXnx5S2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4vigXVetSAZ1tSi1U0_wK-D14PQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13967808</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cOZ2T968LYGO2AXnx5S2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4vigXVetSAZ1tSi1U0_wK-D14PQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rLt2T6CCCqeq2QXW6ty1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEbqkEvr7WqwH37kaTlB8j1BJPpqg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13965273</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rLt2T6CCCqeq2QXW6ty1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEbqkEvr7WqwH37kaTlB8j1BJPpqg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UpF2T4ebGM7CsQLYpJ2hBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGL0_z-cntTWvFEntMYOB9erg5cfQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13964176</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UpF2T4ebGM7CsQLYpJ2hBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGL0_z-cntTWvFEntMYOB9erg5cfQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=D2d2T-bEH_GpsALYkN2hBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGr0E2neUxopoyG_43Z0oMR4wRO9g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13955926</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=D2d2T-bEH_GpsALYkN2hBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGr0E2neUxopoyG_43Z0oMR4wRO9g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Bj12T43jK6jA2gX1uoSqDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH2YimF4H8o8HwUl5bDyHGhU7stOw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13951945</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Bj12T43jK6jA2gX1uoSqDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH2YimF4H8o8HwUl5bDyHGhU7stOw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tRJ2T8CEEIWQ2AW2opm6DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFc-Dc7eXiSOwqozAFnTH2BSxUjZQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13946744</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tRJ2T8CEEIWQ2AW2opm6DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFc-Dc7eXiSOwqozAFnTH2BSxUjZQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=huh1T-q3AojA2gXzhp2UDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEYYZC7nYAvQiQxyJaWv2RcMepETg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13941298</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=huh1T-q3AojA2gXzhp2UDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEYYZC7nYAvQiQxyJaWv2RcMepETg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Vb51T5jxI8W_2QWX55CwDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGaU4E7HGbnhbmqxzPa0fVfFOkmUw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13930846</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Vb51T5jxI8W_2QWX55CwDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGaU4E7HGbnhbmqxzPa0fVfFOkmUw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eL11T527BOqW2AWo3_2QDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjPfIbtteMD5LjYADheukyz2WJTQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13930708</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eL11T527BOqW2AWo3_2QDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjPfIbtteMD5LjYADheukyz2WJTQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hJR1T4bpGujy2QWr8dWPDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHxoaFNLz-_6XD6J335pniiox9Q8g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13927581</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hJR1T4bpGujy2QWr8dWPDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHxoaFNLz-_6XD6J335pniiox9Q8g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=imt1T7LWDYGg8gTa2dSSBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHCwgYTPRX4V2kn6nBVU5C5bQ6L_g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13924993</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=imt1T7LWDYGg8gTa2dSSBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHCwgYTPRX4V2kn6nBVU5C5bQ6L_g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yz91T4nXGenu2gXYm-2sDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHlhGPnTs9ASh76hEVdZifdjlYs_g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13923827</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yz91T4nXGenu2gXYm-2sDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHlhGPnTs9ASh76hEVdZifdjlYs_g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lRV1T97eF4iG2gXJ36mwDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfPWhH6LFK5EgkZWQIsuCMxpP1vA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13915863</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lRV1T97eF4iG2gXJ36mwDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfPWhH6LFK5EgkZWQIsuCMxpP1vA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=b-t0T4O-LYjq2QXZzIy0DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHYMepxWkfrR3lCkWGW5gBTWZDMGg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13912212</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=b-t0T4O-LYjq2QXZzIy0DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHYMepxWkfrR3lCkWGW5gBTWZDMGg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UMF0T8nINciQ2AXBmODUDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHTSDToCv4OsaWkqoSxTmAcOs1nbQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13907491</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UMF0T8nINciQ2AXBmODUDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHTSDToCv4OsaWkqoSxTmAcOs1nbQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IZd0T-6VEMX02QWD_uniDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHp8rzdop_ryOQc254LW2n0Y1is6A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13902123</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IZd0T-6VEMX02QWD_uniDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHp8rzdop_ryOQc254LW2n0Y1is6A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=22x0T_GeD8qW2AWA-qXwDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgwfUF9QOvL1QhBHpUdCJ1EUA83Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13892042</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=22x0T_GeD8qW2AWA-qXwDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgwfUF9QOvL1QhBHpUdCJ1EUA83Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U2J0T8_iKcaA2wXa9LTUDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFl2gvGdiDZ-v-46fHfOK2cB6ddDQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13890952</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U2J0T8_iKcaA2wXa9LTUDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFl2gvGdiDZ-v-46fHfOK2cB6ddDQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YkV0T-fxL6qA2gWU_pnFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoOjVB1eJGForGO2QQpmecnWcI7A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13888323</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YkV0T-fxL6qA2gWU_pnFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoOjVB1eJGForGO2QQpmecnWcI7A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sRh0T8rBBKTO2AWj_sTcDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEWy7MeSqVZYgIvxCatyk2Arv8ccQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13885312</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sRh0T8rBBKTO2AWj_sTcDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEWy7MeSqVZYgIvxCatyk2Arv8ccQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=S-5zT-WvHMWl2AWV9rT7Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGE3mJ9MSjh07fIoI1pnZ3txBo1Wg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13884054</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=S-5zT-WvHMWl2AWV9rT7Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGE3mJ9MSjh07fIoI1pnZ3txBo1Wg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=scRzT6LTAfH22AW-sJD9Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFbRzEoZAVeGQIWk-gocW4_MaGblw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13877897</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=scRzT6LTAfH22AW-sJD9Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFbRzEoZAVeGQIWk-gocW4_MaGblw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8JlzT9P1OsOq2gW2u7D-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEyU01t4m20o0osNrOvxa4ndSAXtA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13874263</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8JlzT9P1OsOq2gW2u7D-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEyU01t4m20o0osNrOvxa4ndSAXtA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v29zT-bfJoPY2QXUo9z7Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHS882ZNssC_kyFIj2hIBG46wmPaQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13869681</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v29zT-bfJoPY2QXUo9z7Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHS882ZNssC_kyFIj2hIBG46wmPaQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iUVzT5nAMKbs2QXntd3fDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGj7wK2LC-V-Si1sz4cFqDc3bbFcg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13864006</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iUVzT5nAMKbs2QXntd3fDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGj7wK2LC-V-Si1sz4cFqDc3bbFcg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZBtzT7eqMurO2AXTp5DMDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFju3teb_rZm5tO3D5yXh6q_xURrQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13853255</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZBtzT7eqMurO2AXTp5DMDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFju3teb_rZm5tO3D5yXh6q_xURrQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RhJzT-7yMaeL2AXMkbXHDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYc2RH2z1PeSVY4PsqOMd3NngLPQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13852216</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RhJzT-7yMaeL2AXMkbXHDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYc2RH2z1PeSVY4PsqOMd3NngLPQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9_FyT4LZIMqU2AWjwKHoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9IBLyHW1-dL93LRfFII7gg3wfNw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13849547</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9_FyT4LZIMqU2AWjwKHoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9IBLyHW1-dL93LRfFII7gg3wfNw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PMdyT7qLL4eq2QW4i-CEDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHIjfCWTC42I-vrjFoYdy_2i60jFg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13846655</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PMdyT7qLL4eq2QW4i-CEDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHIjfCWTC42I-vrjFoYdy_2i60jFg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0ZxyT_zEMcmL2AWdrLTcDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFxuHk8QZWND3DhkL8WA-XoQpBfSA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13845389</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0ZxyT_zEMcmL2AWdrLTcDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFxuHk8QZWND3DhkL8WA-XoQpBfSA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kXJyT_XcO4Ko2wWB5JH5Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEqxmmZVjrphcWbk4_9W-AY4H6VRQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13841683</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kXJyT_XcO4Ko2wWB5JH5Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEqxmmZVjrphcWbk4_9W-AY4H6VRQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bkhyT6mDCcOC2AXGxKz6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHCP2EfRYs0_xqqZ1qE3R2wu10TtA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13837896</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bkhyT6mDCcOC2AXGxKz6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHCP2EfRYs0_xqqZ1qE3R2wu10TtA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QR5yT-PGFISc2AWh6p3WDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEAOZ5w08j2uyQammhJtvWn4wIlew" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13832883</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QR5yT-PGFISc2AWh6p3WDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEAOZ5w08j2uyQammhJtvWn4wIlew&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=H_RxT5-ZOoXY2AXv16TFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHRVsVPAPpHe4-YD_iNIglzN2GyYA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13826772</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=H_RxT5-ZOoXY2AXv16TFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHRVsVPAPpHe4-YD_iNIglzN2GyYA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=48lxT9S2C9OnsAKUtbj9BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFpckWpWQ4LgJJ4YfYVvuRwwjUitw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13817166</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=48lxT9S2C9OnsAKUtbj9BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFpckWpWQ4LgJJ4YfYVvuRwwjUitw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=77pxT82DIcXs2QWx1tnxDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdJg_W_LYuY4TxuR9uLo6AiP2tFQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13815502</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=77pxT82DIcXs2QWx1tnxDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdJg_W_LYuY4TxuR9uLo6AiP2tFQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9aJxT9mfK4aysgKdrq39BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvuInjzL-uc5exmCQOZ_oTPeWulg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13813076</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9aJxT9mfK4aysgKdrq39BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvuInjzL-uc5exmCQOZ_oTPeWulg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=CHZxT42WO6apsQLO7oX9BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH11izXzp-OFvMnqwv1aAVeIfI0Wg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13809925</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=CHZxT42WO6apsQLO7oX9BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH11izXzp-OFvMnqwv1aAVeIfI0Wg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XktxT5e9M8ec2AXSiI3vDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1ZVKZtddCqTIJaJVPvGfaCcqbdQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13808786</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XktxT5e9M8ec2AXSiI3vDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1ZVKZtddCqTIJaJVPvGfaCcqbdQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KCFxT_GKLKmPsQL4uoDgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvxvZ6j-gqyKDr-lEbWCm3CntkZg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13801419</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KCFxT_GKLKmPsQL4uoDgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvxvZ6j-gqyKDr-lEbWCm3CntkZg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LPdwT_zRAubC2wXaj-HGDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0Y6T9Nf0oqX-xkcsrsatnTeC66w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13797467</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LPdwT_zRAubC2wXaj-HGDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0Y6T9Nf0oqX-xkcsrsatnTeC66w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=28xwT8uUKqjg2AXZp5XxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFWSh70aJVImCFgxDUlwSYLIbqlg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13792473</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=28xwT8uUKqjg2AXZp5XxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFWSh70aJVImCFgxDUlwSYLIbqlg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v6JwT5TTPOOg2gXc6qXxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFuPe2p9BFIBVcNHu7YWJwO86i3ZA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13787335</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v6JwT5TTPOOg2gXc6qXxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFuPe2p9BFIBVcNHu7YWJwO86i3ZA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=enhwT9SYBKjy2QWw7s2iCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFM0sqRN6oRCzRxUoj2mFMEy0DhwQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13776911</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=enhwT9SYBKjy2QWw7s2iCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFM0sqRN6oRCzRxUoj2mFMEy0DhwQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2nZwT6uxK-WxsgLas_zyBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF21F1anZpNcFQNobzThgLNkZFW8w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13776674</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2nZwT6uxK-WxsgLas_zyBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF21F1anZpNcFQNobzThgLNkZFW8w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eFBwT_PKBOOi2wXvyrHxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEN950RZYL5Kuys-2kIlsyDoK4Now" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13773864</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eFBwT_PKBOOi2wXvyrHxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEN950RZYL5Kuys-2kIlsyDoK4Now&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3iRwT7OiI_DHsQK9vaD4BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfzm8Indbc80CcqR8kwNv0aWAukw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13771359</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3iRwT7OiI_DHsQK9vaD4BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfzm8Indbc80CcqR8kwNv0aWAukw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=APpvT_WrKsLu2gWynZDnDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJ59pkmWPtcrrK6brIcWBcjqGo8g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13770206</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=APpvT_WrKsLu2gWynZDnDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJ59pkmWPtcrrK6brIcWBcjqGo8g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uc9vT8u7KoOM2gW0yL3xAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECQcJxqM7oIdpiz2vCC22JgLXnrg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13767143</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uc9vT8u7KoOM2gW0yL3xAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECQcJxqM7oIdpiz2vCC22JgLXnrg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=f6VvT-KfCerU2AWDyJTxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEa16y_m5pLYaZddyXqjFIog3NhdA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13763442</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=f6VvT-KfCerU2AWDyJTxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEa16y_m5pLYaZddyXqjFIog3NhdA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NntvT7S1JYSe2gX04Y3xAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHgSw7KiIdEUFrnFRaXuoXoo9m_cA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13758493</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NntvT7S1JYSe2gX04Y3xAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHgSw7KiIdEUFrnFRaXuoXoo9m_cA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IlFvT8b1D-jk2QWbpZnxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfY1XntfLTA6M8ZRgS5UOB_ZDE3g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13752761</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IlFvT8b1D-jk2QWbpZnxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfY1XntfLTA6M8ZRgS5UOB_ZDE3g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4iZvT7iDFuWysgKWqNCSBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFM98CI9m8b6E4j201XGDFMoexs9g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13742466</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4iZvT7iDFuWysgKWqNCSBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFM98CI9m8b6E4j201XGDFMoexs9g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eBlvT_P9OKW02wXPm6XyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEN4fbgGGfwS2ernB3yS5cw_PgSUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13740857</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eBlvT_P9OKW02wXPm6XyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEN4fbgGGfwS2ernB3yS5cw_PgSUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Iv5uT_mWKYr1sQLG6cXtBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHP_zyxTaNM3zUdSCTPO-2_HmJUSQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13738414</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Iv5uT_mWKYr1sQLG6cXtBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHP_zyxTaNM3zUdSCTPO-2_HmJUSQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PNNuT9DSLuKG2gWA7ZzxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHFCZXg6dC2RC8F9g9zkLE97-11_A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13735487</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PNNuT9DSLuKG2gWA7ZzxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHFCZXg6dC2RC8F9g9zkLE97-11_A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VKhuT97UOuGW2QX5gIXyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG5416QsNlf9s7v-giUakprIp1W1Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13734306</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VKhuT97UOuGW2QX5gIXyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG5416QsNlf9s7v-giUakprIp1W1Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=En5uT-vdBYiDsALZtdn3BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGqU9EAztsfPIyTEFQNWYgTGnSJjA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13729294</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=En5uT-vdBYiDsALZtdn3BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGqU9EAztsfPIyTEFQNWYgTGnSJjA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4lNuT-eSObSK2QXfybnxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG5hq7TyfFsJsqQsRXMZmmYJuxYwg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13724994</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4lNuT-eSObSK2QXfybnxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG5hq7TyfFsJsqQsRXMZmmYJuxYwg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vCluT8mqLeXg2gWVj_TwAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEw4HalrwItwX-wUxWFFG9LC7OsoQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13719573</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vCluT8mqLeXg2gWVj_TwAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEw4HalrwItwX-wUxWFFG9LC7OsoQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hf9tT4EQiZbZBeDq5fAB&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHu1QrXHVDywFKdyow1rPmP5T3gw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13713800</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hf9tT4EQiZbZBeDq5fAB&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHu1QrXHVDywFKdyow1rPmP5T3gw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7NhtT_myAui42wXNgp3yAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEYpjhkcf235onqkEbKpcdSaepM3Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13703535</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7NhtT_myAui42wXNgp3yAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEYpjhkcf235onqkEbKpcdSaepM3Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZdVtT8imMKrM2AWXgMHxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF_BuVPxOFN4oJbLxdaOjK8ha7gQQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13703096</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZdVtT8imMKrM2AWXgMHxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF_BuVPxOFN4oJbLxdaOjK8ha7gQQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=36ttT7isIqevsgLEpPz-BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmAURoyilGeZk59Sq1bQwaQhi3Hw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13700192</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=36ttT7isIqevsgLEpPz-BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmAURoyilGeZk59Sq1bQwaQhi3Hw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1YJtT8LCC-Ka2gWOmOnxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXbV8I-rUPJkL9Cmb9SmlBPSeNvw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13697791</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1YJtT8LCC-Ka2gWOmOnxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXbV8I-rUPJkL9Cmb9SmlBPSeNvw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FldtT93yO4jbsgLCxKmTBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEuE2fQc_YrlGIdJg0qa2HxiKb12Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13696489</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FldtT93yO4jbsgLCxKmTBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEuE2fQc_YrlGIdJg0qa2HxiKb12Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wCxtT8OCG-OLsQLZ4YCDBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELeIYObdmuzGrHlKW2XNLv862UHQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13687917</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wCxtT8OCG-OLsQLZ4YCDBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELeIYObdmuzGrHlKW2XNLv862UHQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kgJtT4ShPMStsgL4ta3pBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGH-BQjbccHG1DNB3RA4EHJtdqAhA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13683349</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kgJtT4ShPMStsgL4ta3pBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGH-BQjbccHG1DNB3RA4EHJtdqAhA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZdhsT5-wCYKL2AWjh9HlBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFIArNVDah_mUMIgElmQ4PN1WImjw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13678693</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZdhsT5-wCYKL2AWjh9HlBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFIArNVDah_mUMIgElmQ4PN1WImjw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P65sT9ZM6ObaBYi6jYwG&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZplwwKILaluxpy2qaDKQivKox5A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13673817</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P65sT9ZM6ObaBYi6jYwG&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZplwwKILaluxpy2qaDKQivKox5A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=D4RsT-zaLOag2gWznJyZBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2zApk7VmCzvgxBwds-NE06jCycQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13662926</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=D4RsT-zaLOag2gWznJyZBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2zApk7VmCzvgxBwds-NE06jCycQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nXpsT4D6COWg2QXetKWhCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKDzOrvBScJhOn5rjvhxQTD4Tvog" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13661765</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nXpsT4D6COWg2QXetKWhCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKDzOrvBScJhOn5rjvhxQTD4Tvog&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-F5sT_y1AYGY2AXrteiSBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqfqU1YiAC616CcTuS88Q8Qy_jYg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13659311</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-F5sT_y1AYGY2AXrteiSBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqfqU1YiAC616CcTuS88Q8Qy_jYg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uzBsT8W3LaWe2AWtt9mOBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGAhvg6RG5tBSMzOOjCAp300PRIEQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13656095</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uzBsT8W3LaWe2AWtt9mOBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGAhvg6RG5tBSMzOOjCAp300PRIEQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jwVsT4qNHIn02QWYr6T_BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELaraP2JIumR_CwUKB8JDOtGpaxw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13654681</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jwVsT4qNHIn02QWYr6T_BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELaraP2JIumR_CwUKB8JDOtGpaxw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=S9trT83VMeGQ2gWdi_WNBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFBU8syP7HzQBHZLN1GA5bkN9CbTA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13645856</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=S9trT83VMeGQ2gWdi_WNBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFBU8syP7HzQBHZLN1GA5bkN9CbTA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LrFrT5KcPImusgKw14HwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGR9Y_O8-FfqIawxgLvLjrIeYDhTg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13641669</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LrFrT5KcPImusgKw14HwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGR9Y_O8-FfqIawxgLvLjrIeYDhTg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-4ZrT4rQLqSFsAK2t-CABg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFut3WSXM6pwen1W86Ce8GA4EHrSg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13636528</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-4ZrT4rQLqSFsAK2t-CABg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFut3WSXM6pwen1W86Ce8GA4EHrSg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7lxrT-OwFu2OsAL4sfHmBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFu8OkV3PYsE6Y2BPePsS9VQJBmww" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13631727</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7lxrT-OwFu2OsAL4sfHmBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFu8OkV3PYsE6Y2BPePsS9VQJBmww&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kTJrT5LKH4aIsQKQvvz_BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHX2VHr1ZvbCrVtr6OWRbCflyNmCg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13620763</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kTJrT5LKH4aIsQKQvvz_BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHX2VHr1ZvbCrVtr6OWRbCflyNmCg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oCdrT8SiD-Sd2QXU7ZCZBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5Q6a-OaDFnl6CNXuNGbZSYtZKvA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13619362</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oCdrT8SiD-Sd2QXU7ZCZBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5Q6a-OaDFnl6CNXuNGbZSYtZKvA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ywxrT96KJIqysgKr5pHiBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHtW5unab2Hy0hCAAWo_rhG6xqVEw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13617012</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ywxrT96KJIqysgKr5pHiBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHtW5unab2Hy0hCAAWo_rhG6xqVEw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ct5qT6itKITO2AWMhtH3BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDyweNusTrpO97yZAcwV51YIlt7w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13613582</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ct5qT6itKITO2AWMhtH3BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDyweNusTrpO97yZAcwV51YIlt7w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MrRqT6LXEMOM2gXPyPyaBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHlQALPbv2o5kkoqmWTXvkboQNUCQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13612145</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MrRqT6LXEMOM2gXPyPyaBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHlQALPbv2o5kkoqmWTXvkboQNUCQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xIlqT5K1G4i3sQLU3KyKBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7mmOPc11SbEW2xqiiHVxNHyDy9Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13603416</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xIlqT5K1G4i3sQLU3KyKBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7mmOPc11SbEW2xqiiHVxNHyDy9Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uV9qT_rVJIGvsQKmwqH6BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELxQTxkgPNwOzKw6G7eI8CFpAGTQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13599394</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uV9qT_rVJIGvsQKmwqH6BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELxQTxkgPNwOzKw6G7eI8CFpAGTQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WTVqT8UZjKqwAsjLiYsJ&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEq6xmiq37EXzaqaCfb-orfKHD3Yg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13594110</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WTVqT8UZjKqwAsjLiYsJ&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEq6xmiq37EXzaqaCfb-orfKHD3Yg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WgtqT-iUOuGtsQLYmtWbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEdLOd6qiPM6it8CHslRCzo-rxH4Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13588405</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WgtqT-iUOuGtsQLYmtWbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEdLOd6qiPM6it8CHslRCzo-rxH4Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9OBpT87BB-Ww2wWJ_cXwCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUiiZHViVIYpnOsuISgfsgRLaYLw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13577654</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9OBpT87BB-Ww2wWJ_cXwCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUiiZHViVIYpnOsuISgfsgRLaYLw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UtVpT8nlOsKs2gWzsp3uCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVBy88I9Xr7QO_5zVNqBEBEFhKWg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13576465</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UtVpT8nlOsKs2gWzsp3uCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVBy88I9Xr7QO_5zVNqBEBEFhKWg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_bppT661IO-CsgLI06CeAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHTKobMnBRMJTaSEkS2PbPwnYiDIg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13573997</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_bppT661IO-CsgLI06CeAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHTKobMnBRMJTaSEkS2PbPwnYiDIg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tYxpT87bMIPgsQKj9KmHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzvRnelKN-qUNStLntUmt6ocu7sQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13570732</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tYxpT87bMIPgsQKj9KmHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzvRnelKN-qUNStLntUmt6ocu7sQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bWJpT4-2C-TosQKh7bCbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzDHkWc9noSOHOpu1YHyF9vF_X1g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13569362</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bWJpT4-2C-TosQKh7bCbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzDHkWc9noSOHOpu1YHyF9vF_X1g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MThpT5nUJ4HKsQLLhNChCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHTkZ7j57fgA6YffQovL8o3c6dOfw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13560694</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MThpT5nUJ4HKsQLLhNChCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHTkZ7j57fgA6YffQovL8o3c6dOfw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8w1pT9uHOqWesQLCibiPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuO-fOiPfNin9_EEy_LzkScYtjKg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13556506</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8w1pT9uHOqWesQLCibiPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuO-fOiPfNin9_EEy_LzkScYtjKg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zeNoT_6AEMOOsQLO2uSPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEUnqJlUHwDUgI8LHcHK6mgP_NZMw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13551867</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zeNoT_6AEMOOsQLO2uSPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEUnqJlUHwDUgI8LHcHK6mgP_NZMw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3LloT52WBKLosQKMk8yqCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGBUxaZNxr2lfL4JlaH5v8YhEaWjQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13546004</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3LloT52WBKLosQKMk8yqCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGBUxaZNxr2lfL4JlaH5v8YhEaWjQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bI9oT9G3O432sQKzptSFCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9vw2jI0xXwAoba5j2xriIlApfkQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13535350</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bI9oT9G3O432sQKzptSFCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9vw2jI0xXwAoba5j2xriIlApfkQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=94FoT4azCuWW2AXy_K37CA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1xbQARlm1qKcu_SKSCALSvJRVdg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13533834</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=94FoT4azCuWW2AXy_K37CA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1xbQARlm1qKcu_SKSCALSvJRVdg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6mhoT4SyOoXfsQKPsZSXCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEA8Jci5bVt7QlwOsxMdQxVCed-4w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13531667</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6mhoT4SyOoXfsQKPsZSXCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEA8Jci5bVt7QlwOsxMdQxVCed-4w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GTtoT5_rO4qO2wWT172LCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGtAZH-RUXiix0xH4kEhMqQwCf0dQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13528093</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GTtoT5_rO4qO2wWT172LCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGtAZH-RUXiix0xH4kEhMqQwCf0dQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xBoT_OXPIGvsgLfytmHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGTJUtYGxMhkePKg_9bZDo5K48e5A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13526951</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xBoT_OXPIGvsgLfytmHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGTJUtYGxMhkePKg_9bZDo5K48e5A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-ZnT7KjCsiJsQKnwoyuCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHK_7Kb9KqtW2mUNpvqHAFZhroD7A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13518015</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-ZnT7KjCsiJsQKnwoyuCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHK_7Kb9KqtW2mUNpvqHAFZhroD7A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gbxnT5DfCKT_sQL0xcGcCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGtwydsvWdZuWHIz6CMbFT5ggeQXQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13513748</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gbxnT5DfCKT_sQL0xcGcCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGtwydsvWdZuWHIz6CMbFT5ggeQXQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UpJnT9HFIIyqsALIy4mLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHF73nycsbZMXsMaPCwHAIjFSsHEQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13509286</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UpJnT9HFIIyqsALIy4mLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHF73nycsbZMXsMaPCwHAIjFSsHEQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NGhnT_iOEIn2sQKk9u22Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEQtl06FE5oTXl2riSGAKZufG6VxQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13503696</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NGhnT_iOEIn2sQKk9u22Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEQtl06FE5oTXl2riSGAKZufG6VxQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4j1nT9XoAse2sQKz_Ki3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfzXnOv3ecmSoIrR1Ja45ipvzuoQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13493402</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4j1nT9XoAse2sQKz_Ki3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfzXnOv3ecmSoIrR1Ja45ipvzuoQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0jVnT-z9MKnW2gXwlLmvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwKHs1n7SwZQc3gXagMCBQGDC9tA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13492346</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0jVnT-z9MKnW2gXwlLmvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwKHs1n7SwZQc3gXagMCBQGDC9tA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zhdnT-TEMMLI2gWj4O3SCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEUBqntk8qY3BYTpGZaXGLPnrsWfA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13489641</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zhdnT-TEMMLI2gWj4O3SCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEUBqntk8qY3BYTpGZaXGLPnrsWfA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qOlmT_6sGK_isQL27Ji3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF50uoA3w4wUP9bCVvDv2LCSmh0Fw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13486560</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qOlmT_6sGK_isQL27Ji3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF50uoA3w4wUP9bCVvDv2LCSmh0Fw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VL9mT-uKGMG4sQLxt4i3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHVZuSxd3MGi4OY4HhhFlkItdA2Ew" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13485491</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VL9mT-uKGMG4sQLxt4i3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHVZuSxd3MGi4OY4HhhFlkItdA2Ew&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=G5VmT4vWKdLMsQK4wpG3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFcunkA8ZAJzs7Qw5hD2GmV7qJhwQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13482146</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=G5VmT4vWKdLMsQK4wpG3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFcunkA8ZAJzs7Qw5hD2GmV7qJhwQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=92pmT46JF-2CsAL3y4S3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHj--2IQk3TLFipeIkbq5MOuEmYog" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13478528</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=92pmT46JF-2CsAL3y4S3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHj--2IQk3TLFipeIkbq5MOuEmYog&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0UBmT_WOGa_5sQKp0ui2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvAc2K6pY_08hgd9q58hOlKIdNOw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13473425</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0UBmT_WOGa_5sQKp0ui2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvAc2K6pY_08hgd9q58hOlKIdNOw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oBZmT7qSGsqe2gXfh9GxCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGCn0SIowejGTzNBM-QTMf3VK79qA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13467547</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oBZmT7qSGsqe2gXfh9GxCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGCn0SIowejGTzNBM-QTMf3VK79qA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=a-xlT5iJGsS-2AWD3KzYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESe64UQnMvw6OoXuSiC8MiOfxQMQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13456620</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=a-xlT5iJGsS-2AWD3KzYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESe64UQnMvw6OoXuSiC8MiOfxQMQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xdplT5S-I6nMsQK40L2zDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFmuBw7hKu1hMXZKS4kosEb4x1vQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13454357</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xdplT5S-I6nMsQK40L2zDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFmuBw7hKu1hMXZKS4kosEb4x1vQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ccZlT8_5Lqjm2gXD8fHeCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHkv3IFeCRaA_squTXzVV-154xgXQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13452106</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ccZlT8_5Lqjm2gXD8fHeCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHkv3IFeCRaA_squTXzVV-154xgXQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QphlT6GFOMGrsQK_zpC3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHJOH9zc8x4YufL0lQ6ul47usk5xQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13448683</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QphlT6GFOMGrsQK_zpC3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHJOH9zc8x4YufL0lQ6ul47usk5xQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6G1lT--iCaTjsQK0jb23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnsdVxI3mIR8-8HRIG7NDeCIBzog" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13447537</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6G1lT--iCaTjsQK0jb23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnsdVxI3mIR8-8HRIG7NDeCIBzog&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=80NlT8iCBoqFsAK0-b23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGf396rsUSE03Oxfwq4Jjs2C6-IUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13442423</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=80NlT8iCBoqFsAK0-b23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGf396rsUSE03Oxfwq4Jjs2C6-IUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nRllT-efBqf5sQL9g-23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJPJsVBx2gWInCnHFuZkx8bg30YQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13438352</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nRllT-efBqf5sQL9g-23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJPJsVBx2gWInCnHFuZkx8bg30YQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=f-9kT6-GBeGQsAKTofG2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGX4DJejbjNSqZx-VzNKjs5L96tmw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13433169</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=f-9kT6-GBeGQsAKTofG2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGX4DJejbjNSqZx-VzNKjs5L96tmw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RMVkT4SqI42qsAKZrqC2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWuc473yhrZusdDCBop33VtPrY1Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13427115</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RMVkT4SqI42qsAKZrqC2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWuc473yhrZusdDCBop33VtPrY1Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LJtkT7qCGMeKsQLIle22Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEa_JbUZo3Ja16vXoGWuLleijROsA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13416207</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LJtkT7qCGMeKsQLIle22Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEa_JbUZo3Ja16vXoGWuLleijROsA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_oxkT6rjGKKGsgK42dW2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEO68WWQoUdTjkZJy92kUDj3P1DgA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13414635</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_oxkT6rjGKKGsgK42dW2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEO68WWQoUdTjkZJy92kUDj3P1DgA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GnVkT5X8LrCDsAL7-qy2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFA9d38LGGnHnQs76lmiB6umJC6sQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13412433</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GnVkT5X8LrCDsAL7-qy2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFA9d38LGGnHnQs76lmiB6umJC6sQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XUdkT5iQOob22gWq1Y3gCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGkYTg8xbtH6Ag-J9nWdo-rLMZN9A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13408830</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XUdkT5iQOob22gWq1Y3gCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGkYTg8xbtH6Ag-J9nWdo-rLMZN9A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QRxkT5O9J6mPsQLum423Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHE6jjWUcsvlUiTifCa4oljBk8IWQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13407663</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QRxkT5O9J6mPsQLum423Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHE6jjWUcsvlUiTifCa4oljBk8IWQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W_JjT7meLeeW2AXtmcnbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfc8vJkrzfkW3Hits55PYuQGs8FQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13403927</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W_JjT7meLeeW2AXtmcnbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfc8vJkrzfkW3Hits55PYuQGs8FQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LchjT-r3AYHlsQL9uZGcCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFnbIPO8YgtibzdOs9mOcOcbGyeAA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13403749</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LchjT-r3AYHlsQL9uZGcCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFnbIPO8YgtibzdOs9mOcOcbGyeAA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AJ5jT6qtI4eFsALbg_SbCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdJK8vBIbLDfo-6Z0K2D1JQ24xyg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13403561</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AJ5jT6qtI4eFsALbg_SbCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdJK8vBIbLDfo-6Z0K2D1JQ24xyg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KUpjT--JBeKS2QXP1-XrCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfFpKOcS0efZlL8KGJ-J__Ev5-SQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13398894</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KUpjT--JBeKS2QXP1-XrCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfFpKOcS0efZlL8KGJ-J__Ev5-SQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pSFjT7GHDKbO2AWrkp3WCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQpheCyOqNIGt8ovsKuTTOkrp7Ug" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13398056</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pSFjT7GHDKbO2AWrkp3WCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQpheCyOqNIGt8ovsKuTTOkrp7Ug&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=avViT5LtJKeq2QX85tXPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgz-ptglB7nVuPmxL8_QE_ZOnTDQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13395348</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=avViT5LtJKeq2QX85tXPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgz-ptglB7nVuPmxL8_QE_ZOnTDQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U8tiT779Ie-psALizYGcCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHm6gmR6iP57-rj_3EGyql69IsODg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13389672</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U8tiT779Ie-psALizYGcCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHm6gmR6iP57-rj_3EGyql69IsODg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TKFiT-GILOrg2gXKxZTMCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEF090Ey2KMOT0frkoHFDDO1frm9Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13381440</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TKFiT-GILOrg2gXKxZTMCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEF090Ey2KMOT0frkoHFDDO1frm9Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5XZiT_jZK4aEsAL_srikDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVkV1LhPFyYULs5YOPKA_1CZ40gg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13377890</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5XZiT_jZK4aEsAL_srikDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVkV1LhPFyYULs5YOPKA_1CZ40gg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=30xiT6imPITW2gWS1azcCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhHICd6YUDqz42l1CdxxBqDT2w0g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13373952</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=30xiT6imPITW2gWS1azcCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhHICd6YUDqz42l1CdxxBqDT2w0g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fyJiT4GcMsK_2QXwvei2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGg2IiQsgWiV98AScJyTDEDWjPxEw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13364038</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fyJiT4GcMsK_2QXwvei2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGg2IiQsgWiV98AScJyTDEDWjPxEw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cx5iT5b0GerC2wWj_NXvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCPscEZK-3z3pBOSQKdn5kzflPlg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13362576</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cx5iT5b0GerC2wWj_NXvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCPscEZK-3z3pBOSQKdn5kzflPlg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uQBiT-36BqLlsQLbxrSkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHj64WlAD6IRwKcNVcS5kMAAv0YaA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13361261</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uQBiT-36BqLlsQLbxrSkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHj64WlAD6IRwKcNVcS5kMAAv0YaA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zs9hT4aWGOSJsgKJ8KWkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfRr6h3R1_8U_1l0C5Kd9IIjF6pA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13358724</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zs9hT4aWGOSJsgKJ8KWkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfRr6h3R1_8U_1l0C5Kd9IIjF6pA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-aNhT9j_HcX7sQK3hq2JAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjxko-6LGZAZ5Ey-0CdzUXmckW9Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13355832</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-aNhT9j_HcX7sQK3hq2JAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjxko-6LGZAZ5Ey-0CdzUXmckW9Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nHlhT4CXOOT42gXUjbWPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5eTVW8_neJ5KqHZntjS9uHczd2g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13350879</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nHlhT4CXOOT42gXUjbWPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5eTVW8_neJ5KqHZntjS9uHczd2g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gE9hT8DOO8_JsQK2-djyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEXgB9Ct6Ld_spWyNfF2ODedPWSgQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13340471</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gE9hT8DOO8_JsQK2-djyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEXgB9Ct6Ld_spWyNfF2ODedPWSgQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HiVhT_SSAcji2QX4x72CCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHLqQYL8JXQ5lVo293zYXD8h35FLg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13336481</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HiVhT_SSAcji2QX4x72CCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHLqQYL8JXQ5lVo293zYXD8h35FLg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9PpgT5meBY2H2AWE-OCaCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGn8QlBSlPhynCMvX6XvAFMgFD_DA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13332426</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9PpgT5meBY2H2AWE-OCaCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGn8QlBSlPhynCMvX6XvAFMgFD_DA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P9FgT7wPjIOwAuvv3JYI&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1Y5z5D9PFSVX0zeHIoHpdfYfGSw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13326277</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P9FgT7wPjIOwAuvv3JYI&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1Y5z5D9PFSVX0zeHIoHpdfYfGSw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KK5gT6KyFtTKsQL4oJSWCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGIcnh9B2ES0ZYmeEL5sszMchj7-g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13318830</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KK5gT6KyFtTKsQL4oJSWCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGIcnh9B2ES0ZYmeEL5sszMchj7-g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FKdgT6qzI8jL2QXH_cCdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXCkQ8g76O6717GgMN-1gXygpFfw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13318348</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FKdgT6qzI8jL2QXH_cCdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXCkQ8g76O6717GgMN-1gXygpFfw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iYBgT-T_CYXm2AWXvuSpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFar4PeWtGiQBe6eMysMT-oLTOt2w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13315819</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iYBgT-T_CYXm2AWXvuSpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFar4PeWtGiQBe6eMysMT-oLTOt2w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0VJgT5qeD4Pu2gXm-a2BCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHtUNTFwozujwqOHvWMkUKTGq8MRw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13312934</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0VJgT5qeD4Pu2gXm-a2BCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHtUNTFwozujwqOHvWMkUKTGq8MRw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EyhgT7v8FYrg2AX8p5mVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKBCi6vYo-e3S2JTqclbYmz4-2Vg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13310583</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EyhgT7v8FYrg2AX8p5mVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKBCi6vYo-e3S2JTqclbYmz4-2Vg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9v1fT4fXFcWGsgLYtICiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjcrfsWk-OmH5v4nC5Vlv4c5cIEg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13300531</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9v1fT4fXFcWGsgLYtICiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjcrfsWk-OmH5v4nC5Vlv4c5cIEg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lNNfT43UFc-JsAK2nYWTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGf868QBMBJpjVcj1anOQtu-u_Zig" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13296299</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lNNfT43UFc-JsAK2nYWTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGf868QBMBJpjVcj1anOQtu-u_Zig&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jqlfT63bNcTC2wWFr9SSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGAdji2OObxRPTIEZIS23S3T7BJrw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13291374</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jqlfT63bNcTC2wWFr9SSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGAdji2OObxRPTIEZIS23S3T7BJrw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oH9fT-m0OMSvsgKq2bykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH2vcvuY-3Wt7lAkI69S6mJcEt9Og" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13284312</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oH9fT-m0OMSvsgKq2bykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH2vcvuY-3Wt7lAkI69S6mJcEt9Og&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O1ZfT5BcwqDaBZaqgYQI&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHz95s_URH-nQRydgxmsEp3aE3f0Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13276611</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O1ZfT5BcwqDaBZaqgYQI&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHz95s_URH-nQRydgxmsEp3aE3f0Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KkpfT-nWDoPq2QWDs4CnCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBmVavBESlXASXLSs7knVm24ET6A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13275925</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KkpfT-nWDoPq2QWDs4CnCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBmVavBESlXASXLSs7knVm24ET6A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MC5fT-ziGMbS2QX8xeWJCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcrhk_-87OrtelOyB2MBsb7geMpA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13273613</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MC5fT-ziGMbS2QX8xeWJCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcrhk_-87OrtelOyB2MBsb7geMpA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LAFfT_OxM8fe2AXqmcGpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF_2CeH1dHyO-Vj-El5-D3UYajMaQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13270459</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LAFfT_OxM8fe2AXqmcGpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF_2CeH1dHyO-Vj-El5-D3UYajMaQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9ZeT8m5CuOy2wWxg9yzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHx47V_zcmES7_DCi70Raat79FUcw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13269225</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9ZeT8m5CuOy2wWxg9yzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHx47V_zcmES7_DCi70Raat79FUcw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bKxeT_PUBenC2wXGh-DzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEUTrpcQrrwUo5BjWs_4-mWuOb5DA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13259241</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bKxeT_PUBenC2wXGh-DzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEUTrpcQrrwUo5BjWs_4-mWuOb5DA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SoJeT8HbOIeFsALi6cTNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGFOS19QU44lvvHu10d4jdd-ujbjg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13254757</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SoJeT8HbOIeFsALi6cTNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGFOS19QU44lvvHu10d4jdd-ujbjg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_FdeT7m_MOHi2gW5-N2HDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVksX4nE0lS8y0xYFIEx79UY2wfw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13249858</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_FdeT7m_MOHi2gW5-N2HDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVksX4nE0lS8y0xYFIEx79UY2wfw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DS5eT4LLKJTisQL-i63EDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtz1xmVdVmI6Yv-BtfEfOpoEtEdQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13244661</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DS5eT4LLKJTisQL-i63EDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtz1xmVdVmI6Yv-BtfEfOpoEtEdQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FgReT5jECojO2wWO_KHaDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEHZRIlFTAefYEGjfrmd3E5rQLiiQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13235039</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FgReT5jECojO2wWO_KHaDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEHZRIlFTAefYEGjfrmd3E5rQLiiQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jvtdT62XLOeW2AXDn6zCAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGD4jZCYq21u-zfU6EfBzS8Yj1Taw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13234367</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jvtdT62XLOeW2AXDn6zCAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGD4jZCYq21u-zfU6EfBzS8Yj1Taw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ut1dT-vgJ-Oo2wWayZ37Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHyH03xKVu3z4O9IooKeaMyB1GPrg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13232140</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ut1dT-vgJ-Oo2wWayZ37Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHyH03xKVu3z4O9IooKeaMyB1GPrg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ta9dT4KvDaW02wWIrI2BDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNoRCIqYkeHQ1TjNaBuShXFdyzLQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13228962</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ta9dT4KvDaW02wWIrI2BDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNoRCIqYkeHQ1TjNaBuShXFdyzLQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GoVdT7K3A8Wa2AXvvdT8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKk_4YmeqkagyNVL2nYO2a9Cr7ug" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13227691</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GoVdT7K3A8Wa2AXvvdT8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKk_4YmeqkagyNVL2nYO2a9Cr7ug&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01pdT_q0KIqDsAKwxYXTDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDB5VP1lxEX4Uzh-wCf7W7fN4LNQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13219905</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01pdT_q0KIqDsAKwxYXTDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDB5VP1lxEX4Uzh-wCf7W7fN4LNQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kKdcT5CJKMjL2QXJwMGOBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE637duuSsxdrRHkQlOfafc1PI1Kw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13193529</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kKdcT5CJKMjL2QXJwMGOBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE637duuSsxdrRHkQlOfafc1PI1Kw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FcNbT561MY7hsQKrqrS_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGI7KnM1cJM4VAi5lffbAwRdfok7Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13167795</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FcNbT561MY7hsQKrqrS_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGI7KnM1cJM4VAi5lffbAwRdfok7Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=65hbT5e-OOWe2wXfwoCDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEuL24YTLjGVq6ElEZYyrKicpVTFw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13162301</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=65hbT5e-OOWe2wXfwoCDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEuL24YTLjGVq6ElEZYyrKicpVTFw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6W5bT6CRGuGQ2gXE9cT6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGbHlMyzM9rHBl59PzN3_aPZx8jjg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13152502</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6W5bT6CRGuGQ2gXE9cT6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGbHlMyzM9rHBl59PzN3_aPZx8jjg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WxbT8XWE4P02QXh2fDeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZwybubXyjgA7fpJupHRQDUMeuXg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13152246</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WxbT8XWE4P02QXh2fDeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZwybubXyjgA7fpJupHRQDUMeuXg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DkVbT9yXI6rM2AXSwomKAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEr0H-GXMVQEj_IpHfGi8zj7SB8XA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13149182</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DkVbT9yXI6rM2AXSwomKAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEr0H-GXMVQEj_IpHfGi8zj7SB8XA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZxtbT4KSGMqGsgLkjMXJDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGPCheLAg6afnvRnkbt2lMCgqUanA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13146777</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZxtbT4KSGMqGsgLkjMXJDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGPCheLAg6afnvRnkbt2lMCgqUanA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KPBaT5-2N4SNsALZmOWxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGEU8toKfbqbE0gTAeStfFoDtPVVw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13145389</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KPBaT5-2N4SNsALZmOWxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGEU8toKfbqbE0gTAeStfFoDtPVVw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-MVaT5qaHtSk2gWwqeHvDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsK6X37aVirDNF5DfFChMJHapyGQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13136188</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-MVaT5qaHtSk2gWwqeHvDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsK6X37aVirDNF5DfFChMJHapyGQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yptaT5ueAaad2QXgy8XwDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE7EkaYr_RzYw0ZSoS3yQX4d-EKwg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13132520</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yptaT5ueAaad2QXgy8XwDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE7EkaYr_RzYw0ZSoS3yQX4d-EKwg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PnJaT4f2I-Wg2AXSuYnjDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_ZYIlpaS2Xo45ql2ggQeL7Wcn-w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13127742</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PnJaT4f2I-Wg2AXSuYnjDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_ZYIlpaS2Xo45ql2ggQeL7Wcn-w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XkdaT833IJT1sQKokaTJDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjpYN6CQSKQYgKR9qfmIKUknQCIg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13121546</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XkdaT833IJT1sQKokaTJDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjpYN6CQSKQYgKR9qfmIKUknQCIg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mx1aT_G5LMK1sQLE66zkDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIeci0YD5DXVpymmFCHwNWOwwD7g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13111297</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mx1aT_G5LMK1sQLE66zkDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIeci0YD5DXVpymmFCHwNWOwwD7g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xRBaT9CvM6LlsQLWwYHaDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4bTBkccwd3KkBdmusUvbY__W18w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13110012</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xRBaT9CvM6LlsQLWwYHaDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4bTBkccwd3KkBdmusUvbY__W18w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UvNZT7HCBtTKsQKNjfnEDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGS8Nk1_8vLku6CootD-hV_1XhpBQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13107647</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UvNZT7HCBtTKsQKNjfnEDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGS8Nk1_8vLku6CootD-hV_1XhpBQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=w8lZT4KDD7OmsALwhYm5DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHY9OCDSgNvJq_sDHRBwGjuIXVwmA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13104674</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=w8lZT4KDD7OmsALwhYm5DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHY9OCDSgNvJq_sDHRBwGjuIXVwmA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r55ZT9WmMYuosAL5-tjZDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEHxt036CflkAG0YtKQxJn-WKvcbA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13103328</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r55ZT9WmMYuosAL5-tjZDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEHxt036CflkAG0YtKQxJn-WKvcbA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WnRZT9yzBofpsQLK-I3ADQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEAh2RlKtPDC5wD4UzShsh7TgOApA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13098095</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WnRZT9yzBofpsQLK-I3ADQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEAh2RlKtPDC5wD4UzShsh7TgOApA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LEpZT4XVNI32sQK179WuDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKCJovHoArR59JytvTKMmLjX9i1g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13094028</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LEpZT4XVNI32sQK179WuDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKCJovHoArR59JytvTKMmLjX9i1g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DSBZT-maNYb3sQKx7Z3XDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHwvDQYOMzWNEyVSzpt6b1asNqKuQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13088962</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DSBZT-maNYb3sQKx7Z3XDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHwvDQYOMzWNEyVSzpt6b1asNqKuQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8vVYT92JLIeQsAKOxKnKDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEkUxFzLTdhVLXLGGhbbMA3vY34ug" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13083108</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8vVYT92JLIeQsAKOxKnKDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEkUxFzLTdhVLXLGGhbbMA3vY34ug&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Y85YT-yADs3jsQKO2IjCDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-V1NRx16FI8DaaR2m_O_lvl7SVw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13072569</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Y85YT-yADs3jsQKO2IjCDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-V1NRx16FI8DaaR2m_O_lvl7SVw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vblYT5K-Maz2sQKcwLmPBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFm7gWPZbuEKTaTC1yJUXd9GeL-nw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13070764</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vblYT5K-Maz2sQKcwLmPBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFm7gWPZbuEKTaTC1yJUXd9GeL-nw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SKJYT-TfEceEsgKlruXbDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCzDdMPJVx6JZS340zE1czWsU5-A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13068502</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SKJYT-TfEceEsgKlruXbDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCzDdMPJVx6JZS340zE1czWsU5-A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1HdYT6S6KMb5sQL0k5GxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHxkXJDnD-JfoEs_dlMmNEB8ttn4w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13065249</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1HdYT6S6KMb5sQL0k5GxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHxkXJDnD-JfoEs_dlMmNEB8ttn4w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GE1YT9blOeansAL7rPmtDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHY7t-DwBwl_fN5pIp_fnEH3H1e-Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13063850</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GE1YT9blOeansAL7rPmtDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHY7t-DwBwl_fN5pIp_fnEH3H1e-Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4iJYT672D-SxsALTgr20DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEGFnsk7L4Hc5hHL4_tO21pRKKPiQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13058530</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4iJYT672D-SxsALTgr20DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEGFnsk7L4Hc5hHL4_tO21pRKKPiQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sPhXT6i7M6iPsQKAuajiDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhtl5nIEcYF2rrnT1F5PAkYEWaUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13054737</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sPhXT6i7M6iPsQKAuajiDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhtl5nIEcYF2rrnT1F5PAkYEWaUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A89XT5LuDYnu2gWFnLHPDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjbTgCeaFc-gApLgS97myDz6qV_Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13049888</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A89XT5LuDYnu2gWFnLHPDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjbTgCeaFc-gApLgS97myDz6qV_Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RaRXT62fHaPisQKxmNW1DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdRXH2wo3SdYN5a4t1ER6LptyXoQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13043730</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RaRXT62fHaPisQKxmNW1DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdRXH2wo3SdYN5a4t1ER6LptyXoQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MHtXT5zeLunO2gXI-Nn-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTpUIX1KT5XZZsoPlcBuFi_q-8rQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13032894</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MHtXT5zeLunO2gXI-Nn-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTpUIX1KT5XZZsoPlcBuFi_q-8rQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=emRXT4uRKsKW2QW1u_jQDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKtBgChZkIbLcPybDFPugkr0G4Qw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13030772</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=emRXT4uRKsKW2QW1u_jQDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKtBgChZkIbLcPybDFPugkr0G4Qw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FVBXT4nuG4rq2wWQhJj1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEpTywKLhFqgyM7KU-lvZ_4i-FBrw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13028912</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FVBXT4nuG4rq2wWQhJj1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEpTywKLhFqgyM7KU-lvZ_4i-FBrw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ESdXT4PEOOn9sQKPuuHNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYC2h1GTXmWDNxl0QSvnYQpFQnxQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13025397</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ESdXT4PEOOn9sQKPuuHNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYC2h1GTXmWDNxl0QSvnYQpFQnxQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g_tWT5aPAsiF2AW3qbD5Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGsfii76VdRueyGJN5Cb1uPDDZ16w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13024016</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g_tWT5aPAsiF2AW3qbD5Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGsfii76VdRueyGJN5Cb1uPDDZ16w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UdFWT9LMIunO2gWp1dDlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQX4_QS8RKsPDvGIUVATupeQIzwA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13019294</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UdFWT9LMIunO2gWp1dDlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQX4_QS8RKsPDvGIUVATupeQIzwA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NKdWT92_MpGrsALcxaDJCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFboBriR-mABEqo3s-v5UmTR7OTwQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13015583</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NKdWT92_MpGrsALcxaDJCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFboBriR-mABEqo3s-v5UmTR7OTwQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9nxWT47rNoGvsQLKhvjdCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFHBKOIA68aMUXOCD07moFevhpBZw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13010432</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9nxWT47rNoGvsQLKhvjdCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFHBKOIA68aMUXOCD07moFevhpBZw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z1JWT-HGK8XMsQLv0pjSCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgN-aCDGtDyZhDwseWz5Y20NWUdg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/13004013</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z1JWT-HGK8XMsQLv0pjSCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgN-aCDGtDyZhDwseWz5Y20NWUdg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mylWT47hFoyqsAK409nPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFd1vEqiBgewTnbPLzstlFiEgeDYA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12993256</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mylWT47hFoyqsAK409nPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFd1vEqiBgewTnbPLzstlFiEgeDYA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yhFWT7TKOKetsQKF7bnpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHylsSxzQ3_3M6AmGMawFo1AdM_TA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12990481</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yhFWT7TKOKetsQKF7bnpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHylsSxzQ3_3M6AmGMawFo1AdM_TA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=j_5VT_eOGsavsAK886jpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGIWewfgTHp8jjgMJhFlgM0UzY2Ag" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12988610</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=j_5VT_eOGsavsAK886jpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGIWewfgTHp8jjgMJhFlgM0UzY2Ag&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g9RVT-DaELL_sQLC-ZXjCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGdogkWAS1TbmaTV50-I9kvFtRM7Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12985211</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g9RVT-DaELL_sQLC-ZXjCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGdogkWAS1TbmaTV50-I9kvFtRM7Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DqpVT5nPIuuGsgLr2NDVCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFGOt5VDoRG3ftb3yJ3qHTptyvYlw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12983947</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DqpVT5nPIuuGsgLr2NDVCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFGOt5VDoRG3ftb3yJ3qHTptyvYlw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2H9VT4TmOqaJsAKtxfTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4R9At2gFav2YlQAHxgqGzqTdJAw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12980405</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2H9VT4TmOqaJsAKtxfTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4R9At2gFav2YlQAHxgqGzqTdJAw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVVVT-nfFPKpsALFt4jwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDMP9ef0YaTuBcyCCtuum7Dcmkng" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12976882</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVVVT-nfFPKpsALFt4jwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDMP9ef0YaTuBcyCCtuum7Dcmkng&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iStVT_iNCeKHsgLygPXvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHg-szhEJ4xUAlHYeZAdUeF8D1RQQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12971979</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iStVT_iNCeKHsgLygPXvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHg-szhEJ4xUAlHYeZAdUeF8D1RQQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WQFVT-udJaT_sQKk8tyKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE6xh6xhpgybRA7rdxbjl9yE6-j_Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12965588</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WQFVT-udJaT_sQKk8tyKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE6xh6xhpgybRA7rdxbjl9yE6-j_Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iNhUT9ypEuahsgKG4_XvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPcBwoKKLvOy_atQJ3BLneMWricQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12954647</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iNhUT9ypEuahsgKG4_XvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPcBwoKKLvOy_atQJ3BLneMWricQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ycBUT4KODoKAsgKH94zwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKI5z8u6bD3TgI1jwi4nqPXa9u0g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12951806</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ycBUT4KODoKAsgKH94zwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKI5z8u6bD3TgI1jwi4nqPXa9u0g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C61UT9CNIPGDsgKwpqHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvUv1owAD5WM3jI4x2LE9dCPI_8Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12949743</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C61UT9CNIPGDsgKwpqHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvUv1owAD5WM3jI4x2LE9dCPI_8Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OoRUT_yOMOvksQKa4tTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGyRcgN1cy_Ty0FSBFM4VPlBN0xVQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12946588</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OoRUT_yOMOvksQKa4tTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGyRcgN1cy_Ty0FSBFM4VPlBN0xVQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nFhUT47wNKaesQKsroDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2VZ02RAzrKZ5bSGjstfuzI-7D8Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12945298</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nFhUT47wNKaesQKsroDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2VZ02RAzrKZ5bSGjstfuzI-7D8Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VC5UT4v1IKT_sQKk8tyKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoLdmWyCo13DRvkn0T35Mu628E-A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12942040</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VC5UT4v1IKT_sQKk8tyKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoLdmWyCo13DRvkn0T35Mu628E-A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JwRUT4vWA-P2sQLU-oTwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG62sAzk4rriWGiCsd5K4hTQEWO6w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12938632</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JwRUT4vWA-P2sQLU-oTwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG62sAzk4rriWGiCsd5K4hTQEWO6w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9tlTT5-EO-HIsQKdhZHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXS6iiS7ykny7pcwJirqiusgLRgw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12933553</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9tlTT5-EO-HIsQKdhZHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXS6iiS7ykny7pcwJirqiusgLRgw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=069TT865DorgsQKw8oHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGW4jayTrVBpsR2fWL6--xH9JGeUw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12927483</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=069TT865DorgsQKw8oHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGW4jayTrVBpsR2fWL6--xH9JGeUw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OoZTT9j9I4TlsQKE7YHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGDcafoFx_RFroefZr92Ah4YCgCPg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12916205</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OoZTT9j9I4TlsQKE7YHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGDcafoFx_RFroefZr92Ah4YCgCPg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5GxTT8SNBovKsQKFo53wBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvg_CRgbGFVkfh55RCzJoxbNDR_Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12913181</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5GxTT8SNBovKsQKFo53wBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvg_CRgbGFVkfh55RCzJoxbNDR_Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iVtTT9jcKuiDsAL5wJjwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGpt_hvxtahjxSOLxsaZsTp9K4XIw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12911307</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iVtTT9jcKuiDsAL5wJjwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGpt_hvxtahjxSOLxsaZsTp9K4XIw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gjJTT-ChLYOosQK3kIHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHN9HOho73CTImWnRFRXDIbqKf3ag" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12907919</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gjJTT-ChLYOosQK3kIHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHN9HOho73CTImWnRFRXDIbqKf3ag&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HAdTT5HGKfLgsQK897HwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHJ6-HLtX7OMLyZne2mwqTNGBWyKA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12906614</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HAdTT5HGKfLgsQK897HwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHJ6-HLtX7OMLyZne2mwqTNGBWyKA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5txST5SwLaGGsgLBvZjwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFe-rqj8kx9ok0tYprVYyikw1XStA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12903218</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5txST5SwLaGGsgLBvZjwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFe-rqj8kx9ok0tYprVYyikw1XStA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sLJST-ToAe6CsgLTtZDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGFRy1RH9xKxOfZ_P2pDwN9ToLL3w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12900180</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sLJST-ToAe6CsgLTtZDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGFRy1RH9xKxOfZ_P2pDwN9ToLL3w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oohST7yhJuKHsgLygPXvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrE1H3VbxjEK-AyHm2CXZNKiP-vw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12895227</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oohST7yhJuKHsgLygPXvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrE1H3VbxjEK-AyHm2CXZNKiP-vw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bV5ST83rA5CFsAKm0IDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4iCa939fOuvfm4sIndwmbP6kLbQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12888845</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bV5ST83rA5CFsAKm0IDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4iCa939fOuvfm4sIndwmbP6kLbQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sjVST6-YPIegsgLQt9TvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGyoBp9U6C0mmqYdbpiOnT-AFESzg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12877654</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sjVST6-YPIegsgLQt9TvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGyoBp9U6C0mmqYdbpiOnT-AFESzg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nxZST76YOoSqsQKL7OHvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERbWX0P3ArCd_nQk-toVBD9bSDJw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12874000</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nxZST76YOoSqsQKL7OHvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERbWX0P3ArCd_nQk-toVBD9bSDJw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_QlST4HxD-SNsQKC5OTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEYmHjO4Cv4-z6vxKGvtCk51QyZ3A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12872609</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_QlST4HxD-SNsQKC5OTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEYmHjO4Cv4-z6vxKGvtCk51QyZ3A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OOBRT9GmKoGKsgL-lfTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGkgw_WLNhzjLbiqA6zamayVeLGFw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12868750</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OOBRT9GmKoGKsgL-lfTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGkgw_WLNhzjLbiqA6zamayVeLGFw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=o7VRT8YqqYOwAqun9O8F&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNrAjlOmhv-XnbmzwCF_w941lcqw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12867369</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=o7VRT8YqqYOwAqun9O8F&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNrAjlOmhv-XnbmzwCF_w941lcqw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W4tRT9vAGu3KsQLkoP3vBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNETSte1y_JkkKfA3StAgKiA4BfjnA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12860122</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W4tRT9vAGu3KsQLkoP3vBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNETSte1y_JkkKfA3StAgKiA4BfjnA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jWFRT6-pOYK40gHS1cnxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG50QMUuKI_jnXHTLgGCsbnGAySbw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12857115</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jWFRT6-pOYK40gHS1cnxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG50QMUuKI_jnXHTLgGCsbnGAySbw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DzdRT6CoBY3qtgfi0a2oDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrHP-Cx0d3k6tlEivzy9dBqGaPlw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12852094</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DzdRT6CoBY3qtgfi0a2oDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrHP-Cx0d3k6tlEivzy9dBqGaPlw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0gxRT8GVJqfDsQLtq9G-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElycf3jCdW49ucopdFYOXQ0ZQwvw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12845663</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0gxRT8GVJqfDsQLtq9G-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElycf3jCdW49ucopdFYOXQ0ZQwvw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=--NQT52IJaiPsQKI073BDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEK6HfwwJOwK-1x-OZbMSKKjEpjMg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12834532</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=--NQT52IJaiPsQKI073BDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEK6HfwwJOwK-1x-OZbMSKKjEpjMg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=68pQT7e0B4qGsALyxaC4Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZrX42hinYgdN-UKUz9DtOkpJHWw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12831755</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=68pQT7e0B4qGsALyxaC4Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZrX42hinYgdN-UKUz9DtOkpJHWw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jrhQT_exLKGQsALyqJneDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4qPg7-BXaaN2pW4fue-_UgOGirg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12829755</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jrhQT_exLKGQsALyqJneDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4qPg7-BXaaN2pW4fue-_UgOGirg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4o5QT-WWG4L4sQKbl5SiDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFmFutP3sOhqPHluNX6NK_Kh5PWug" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12826558</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4o5QT-WWG4L4sQKbl5SiDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFmFutP3sOhqPHluNX6NK_Kh5PWug&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PGRQT5CVB8-LsAK85PCoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFpNo2o4Wgrt2qwWZPR7hoVQ-hhYg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12824911</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PGRQT5CVB8-LsAK85PCoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFpNo2o4Wgrt2qwWZPR7hoVQ-hhYg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8TlQT7SEEePIsQKTz8W1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEp9Drcpd0tqttXrqq9dhmHrnL-oA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12815767</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8TlQT7SEEePIsQKTz8W1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEp9Drcpd0tqttXrqq9dhmHrnL-oA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yA9QT6SDPcelsAKbkoSnDg&amp;amp;ved=0CFEQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQ5tGk42QUzxZoFDuavfz2uPcTig" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12811061</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yA9QT6SDPcelsAKbkoSnDg&amp;amp;ved=0CFEQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQ5tGk42QUzxZoFDuavfz2uPcTig&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=guVPT7PZNNOBsgL9s_C6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CFEQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF83GRbkahsE-LMTWJ3He_kK-abfA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12805892</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=guVPT7PZNNOBsgL9s_C6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CFEQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF83GRbkahsE-LMTWJ3He_kK-abfA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dbtPT8y6B6X_sQLL0ZC8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CFEQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFg9LvQ-Di-t5sg-aLFSWn7AIonqA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12799167</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dbtPT8y6B6X_sQLL0ZC8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CFEQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFg9LvQ-Di-t5sg-aLFSWn7AIonqA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=65JPT6-rGqWlsALw0qyuDg&amp;amp;ved=0CFEQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEZFpxl4Lj5SEAuSWwVPA6KYbQicQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12789686</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=65JPT6-rGqWlsALw0qyuDg&amp;amp;ved=0CFEQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEZFpxl4Lj5SEAuSWwVPA6KYbQicQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BoZPT8aNH8OQgweK-NzpDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFEQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGc11CxkMmRuo82soIvJOjGTZMSWg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12788737</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BoZPT8aNH8OQgweK-NzpDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFEQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGc11CxkMmRuo82soIvJOjGTZMSWg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U2dPT9XuGuj4sQKMytWtDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEbzZixvv-59gse5VpzcdT_45CCUw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12786384</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U2dPT9XuGuj4sQKMytWtDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEbzZixvv-59gse5VpzcdT_45CCUw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YT1PT5bBEZGosALLivmaDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEQl2y66UIdDRagY4DqHFzBcJIpgw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12783752</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YT1PT5bBEZGosALLivmaDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEQl2y66UIdDRagY4DqHFzBcJIpgw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=e-lOT-q7D4qKsgKErcjCDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEygOmCyt8EVmlAOG_GkF_MFiSCIA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12776258</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=e-lOT-q7D4qKsgKErcjCDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEygOmCyt8EVmlAOG_GkF_MFiSCIA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Kb5OT7-ENO2CsAKswOH7Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGiROaXZA-P1Oz3gDVk2LDVhNIp3A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12773715</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Kb5OT7-ENO2CsAKswOH7Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGiROaXZA-P1Oz3gDVk2LDVhNIp3A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C5ROT6nNKqaIsQLvoY0h&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlg-uMSBMth1SDOJAN7VebOUsxvg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12768628</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C5ROT6nNKqaIsQLvoY0h&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlg-uMSBMth1SDOJAN7VebOUsxvg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yGlOT4SgIOOssQLJ06Ak&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzfJ55Ld4zJIj_x4GQ_nDUkee24A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12761900</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yGlOT4SgIOOssQLJ06Ak&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzfJ55Ld4zJIj_x4GQ_nDUkee24A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=20BOT_vVNqqFsAL-350X&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJMkkdcA4yeSJ_v_S18d3iNZT12Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12750091</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=20BOT_vVNqqFsAL-350X&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJMkkdcA4yeSJ_v_S18d3iNZT12Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5SBOT53hIYjpsQKAncn6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEGHBKSZNFpr1XSEc2sXxicsksUGQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12746538</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5SBOT53hIYjpsQKAncn6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEGHBKSZNFpr1XSEc2sXxicsksUGQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=chVOT_jRDJKCsAKMubEL&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEsHX6eYedpDCiInd6VeY5EuABb1w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12745041</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=chVOT_jRDJKCsAKMubEL&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEsHX6eYedpDCiInd6VeY5EuABb1w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7OtNT8OfKIWqsALvpLUK&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKr5_kr4YVGytOykRfrY61xzXSDA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12741448</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7OtNT8OfKIWqsALvpLUK&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKr5_kr4YVGytOykRfrY61xzXSDA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C8FNT8zqPOrHsQLi34gb&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEH3y03uMYZvD7FQzqosMAyxYak1Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12740095</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C8FNT8zqPOrHsQLi34gb&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEH3y03uMYZvD7FQzqosMAyxYak1Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=15ZNT4DZFIWKsALD1uwb&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1B6_plgNtnEpYLqyNgdrpQseLdg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12736121</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=15ZNT4DZFIWKsALD1uwb&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1B6_plgNtnEpYLqyNgdrpQseLdg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sWxNT-6UFa6DsAKRltgR&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFan9B_H31gtfRnCi6U12wSx9Xew" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12733160</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sWxNT-6UFa6DsAKRltgR&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFan9B_H31gtfRnCi6U12wSx9Xew&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dkJNT_quHJDrgQfrjZ3KAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9OE8ZGwD07qUKuwhrwNuown0AwQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12728265</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dkJNT_quHJDrgQfrjZ3KAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9OE8ZGwD07qUKuwhrwNuown0AwQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PBhNT8K7LNHIsQLNmJkT&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFjkHS9XOOzsjsRCINsBVKStKXCFQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12721682</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PBhNT8K7LNHIsQLNmJkT&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFjkHS9XOOzsjsRCINsBVKStKXCFQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=D-9MT4_kGLCrsAKtoJn6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGH8uXUHSNpYqOlVKR8wYu9wLwYYA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12710316</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=D-9MT4_kGLCrsAKtoJn6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGH8uXUHSNpYqOlVKR8wYu9wLwYYA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=V9JMT7S3IIj7sQKP9tke&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE-5p_dXuLgiPq-Wgn9UjDcx9XFdw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12706668</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=V9JMT7S3IIj7sQKP9tke&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE-5p_dXuLgiPq-Wgn9UjDcx9XFdw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0cNMT4bWAqiHsAKvsq0U&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4WWhe1c9gxscTbnjj0_Qu2JRVjg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12704897</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0cNMT4bWAqiHsAKvsq0U&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4WWhe1c9gxscTbnjj0_Qu2JRVjg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=85pMT7e8O--psAKYo9QZ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE7HaCKggwdZs1DyMw1bfM7xrCBmw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12701813</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=85pMT7e8O--psAKYo9QZ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE7HaCKggwdZs1DyMw1bfM7xrCBmw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pm9MT8G5NqmasgKX--0T&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7O0NkzHNsdNVNwWYWkHwmNupNrQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12700509</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pm9MT8G5NqmasgKX--0T&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7O0NkzHNsdNVNwWYWkHwmNupNrQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SUVMT9fqNeT_sQLl2_H6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHty3fMv3qUBLsJoO42LKz2an52Nw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12697100</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SUVMT9fqNeT_sQLl2_H6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHty3fMv3qUBLsJoO42LKz2an52Nw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NBtMT7X6Fs3jsQKhm70L&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgTwXxocyu-aYBblURHxKwS2fj5w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12695747</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NBtMT7X6Fs3jsQKhm70L&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgTwXxocyu-aYBblURHxKwS2fj5w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zfBLT8_eJ6uDsgKR9PnqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmPEDEUBhUzLnIyxpF4RKNuYHPnA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12690880</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zfBLT8_eJ6uDsgKR9PnqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmPEDEUBhUzLnIyxpF4RKNuYHPnA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ncZLT82gB7OGsgLlot3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDVewo6Jwx616jQ2JsNQ3TAH3U3Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12684279</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ncZLT82gB7OGsgLlot3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDVewo6Jwx616jQ2JsNQ3TAH3U3Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U51LT5iqNKWusAKR4fDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXdoOHKK-iWk4OkF-g3bw4NSZwWQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12672920</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U51LT5iqNKWusAKR4fDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXdoOHKK-iWk4OkF-g3bw4NSZwWQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rHpLT5KUJI74sQL_6vXqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHugEMQxAccQdJ9sUeaeMMTLij2EA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12668397</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rHpLT5KUJI74sQL_6vXqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHugEMQxAccQdJ9sUeaeMMTLij2EA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PnJLT77JBfOpsALxounqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFw7h0Rq4tvrLtvHnX5Jmtm0Jiu3A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12667251</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PnJLT77JBfOpsALxounqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFw7h0Rq4tvrLtvHnX5Jmtm0Jiu3A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ekhLT-bvDYj9sQLa5MDXDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfRSRksrQdkhzURNaLU_MIVg92nA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12663629</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ekhLT-bvDYj9sQLa5MDXDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfRSRksrQdkhzURNaLU_MIVg92nA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vh1LT7ehAtTCsQKL3_XqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELM6zfDezk-Bj2Y5UEQ3eT4EQltg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12662378</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vh1LT7ehAtTCsQKL3_XqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELM6zfDezk-Bj2Y5UEQ3eT4EQltg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rfNKT_bvJsvjsQKktuzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFe2LaQhIE2SsLMC79U5RSRF4T44w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12659375</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rfNKT_bvJsvjsQKktuzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFe2LaQhIE2SsLMC79U5RSRF4T44w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fslKT7PBJ4eAsgKx7PTqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEv7ANPb8MlARcU5MTPnZq621R4ew" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12658671</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fslKT7PBJ4eAsgKx7PTqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEv7ANPb8MlARcU5MTPnZq621R4ew&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Qp9KT4P8PIyGsgKp35HrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGMRFJDHwBApkGXySC4LLPJDMc09w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12654100</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Qp9KT4P8PIyGsgKp35HrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGMRFJDHwBApkGXySC4LLPJDMc09w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GXVKT4KrDYH0sQK0xd3FBA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0mk-rGUfqjguigeQNfLJ2AMjDaQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12647345</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GXVKT4KrDYH0sQK0xd3FBA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0mk-rGUfqjguigeQNfLJ2AMjDaQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J0tKT4WOBaP4sQLj7u3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKUoLvb48_zjZFgrqkXiPHrsOUsA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12635549</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J0tKT4WOBaP4sQLj7u3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKUoLvb48_zjZFgrqkXiPHrsOUsA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iyhKT4KMDamlsAK2mvzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG301aCf05MteP0sfqw0dCg_Oy51A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12630889</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iyhKT4KMDamlsAK2mvzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG301aCf05MteP0sfqw0dCg_Oy51A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tSBKT-3MCeL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFv_c80xCYCVXzGHsYYabkf2FsJdg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12629830</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tSBKT-3MCeL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFv_c80xCYCVXzGHsYYabkf2FsJdg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0fZJT9LeNcOGsgKho_TqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHCqJJTJeF7pEmN3aV5Xu1rSkFgfw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12626076</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0fZJT9LeNcOGsgKho_TqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHCqJJTJeF7pEmN3aV5Xu1rSkFgfw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P8xJT9SpKrDKsQKP2YjrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFh4N8z62YCmRMnSydvZnAAbdxY_A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12624748</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P8xJT9SpKrDKsQKP2YjrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFh4N8z62YCmRMnSydvZnAAbdxY_A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JaJJT7i8HcfhsQKksITrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElYvcewxg49jEaYz3NJsZzq2cx4A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12621569</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JaJJT7i8HcfhsQKksITrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElYvcewxg49jEaYz3NJsZzq2cx4A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7XdJT9GbAsWssQKKkOTqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5oqcM-I9AYQZkPN7v5rjcSe5v5w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12620312</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7XdJT9GbAsWssQKKkOTqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5oqcM-I9AYQZkPN7v5rjcSe5v5w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wk1JT7TtCcXMsQKsu_HqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvishlsGIicUfFXEU_0LXt56O5qw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12615321</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wk1JT7TtCcXMsQKsu_HqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvishlsGIicUfFXEU_0LXt56O5qw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kyNJT5_DDYH5sQKfn_jzCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHp0IchqZDcoyK9iNE0zAXSu_LhoA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12608486</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kyNJT5_DDYH5sQKfn_jzCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHp0IchqZDcoyK9iNE0zAXSu_LhoA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zflIT5_ILoT_sQLRyKHzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHDQSU3FwwxKbnZddZrlAsl6CrLOA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12596597</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zflIT5_ILoT_sQLRyKHzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHDQSU3FwwxKbnZddZrlAsl6CrLOA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KNZIT4LQN430sQKiv5TrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH52e-BVp2f0JkZpzpgF5CFnV9UhA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12592438</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KNZIT4LQN430sQKiv5TrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH52e-BVp2f0JkZpzpgF5CFnV9UhA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OM9IT6L0HKyAsgKK-_DqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHGsDLZGW7Eq5-x6bT-hFeP1BEPmw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12591499</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OM9IT6L0HKyAsgKK-_DqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHGsDLZGW7Eq5-x6bT-hFeP1BEPmw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=k6VIT6mAApKNsALpx6zmCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHultXn57Y9wUVPWlihcyl1JQNHZA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12587659</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=k6VIT6mAApKNsALpx6zmCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHultXn57Y9wUVPWlihcyl1JQNHZA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=33pIT4bGAuL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF2_QvPtySfSjn2yYssIiUltWl5GQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12586308</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=33pIT4bGAuL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF2_QvPtySfSjn2yYssIiUltWl5GQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVBIT_KvOYaFsALAwPjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHnRRAYhlYjEGQV2jFRXMlvUIclUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12582533</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVBIT_KvOYaFsALAwPjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHnRRAYhlYjEGQV2jFRXMlvUIclUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eSZIT7XQJMWGsgKs04jrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHLFrV77MG_9ddjMaiRSFNLIIk3qQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12580442</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eSZIT7XQJMWGsgKs04jrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHLFrV77MG_9ddjMaiRSFNLIIk3qQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WfxHT7SSLunKsQLtobWdBA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnu-UvWOVKReXEoAkUU-DdP2pT0A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12575472</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WfxHT7SSLunKsQLtobWdBA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnu-UvWOVKReXEoAkUU-DdP2pT0A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M9JHT6j2C-fnsQKEpOnqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHF-o9ULLbpUMWfsDEiIvr_RICAbA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12569213</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M9JHT6j2C-fnsQKEpOnqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHF-o9ULLbpUMWfsDEiIvr_RICAbA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=46hHT5aVMPPMsQLGuPDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEjzpQYCEQgv0nGs5cIAb4ARWPNlw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12557654</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=46hHT5aVMPPMsQLGuPDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEjzpQYCEQgv0nGs5cIAb4ARWPNlw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6oFHT7GXKc6ztwec4dSfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFbAzgvMUQsPUDPS3gFbMxpLMwu8Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12552991</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6oFHT7GXKc6ztwec4dSfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFbAzgvMUQsPUDPS3gFbMxpLMwu8Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wH1HT66iMMe9gAfKnrmmDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgSSSz6O71vqpxVNOzI7TdUV-tcQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12552439</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wH1HT66iMMe9gAfKnrmmDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgSSSz6O71vqpxVNOzI7TdUV-tcQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01NHT7uBNfLFsQLXwtjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvtDcJH9wiHNJ5o6HLcTVJAE6eow" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12548180</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01NHT7uBNfLFsQLXwtjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvtDcJH9wiHNJ5o6HLcTVJAE6eow&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QylHT83TLYaosQLipenqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMpnuabQtWmhD0rRyaq9768AKoeQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12546780</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QylHT83TLYaosQLipenqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMpnuabQtWmhD0rRyaq9768AKoeQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mf9GT7-HG8qwsAK3ndzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzqKJkVhEbYjPDYFJoHS6n1lXkuA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12543047</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mf9GT7-HG8qwsAK3ndzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzqKJkVhEbYjPDYFJoHS6n1lXkuA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EtVGT_2-B6WlsALDosXqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiAAcODY8csA7nCmVutf5UXz6EUA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12540972</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EtVGT_2-B6WlsALDosXqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiAAcODY8csA7nCmVutf5UXz6EUA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=36pGT-uANommgweI0sGlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnLrDI5SBhRvr3XRGp9r36xo4Spw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12535912</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=36pGT-uANommgweI0sGlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnLrDI5SBhRvr3XRGp9r36xo4Spw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p4BGT-KWGdH0ggfbv8iLDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEu44rRcCqAo5DaqOecYPDm6LWbtQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12529070</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p4BGT-KWGdH0ggfbv8iLDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEu44rRcCqAo5DaqOecYPDm6LWbtQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7FZGT9DSAoW0gwehk6nvDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG0JoBiqdDjs8tP2FIyFKZgsCQtUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12517418</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7FZGT9DSAoW0gwehk6nvDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG0JoBiqdDjs8tP2FIyFKZgsCQtUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fjFGT7W-D46HsALjiJD1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFaVC8CY-i16_R76WxyWnowsZtBag" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12513740</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fjFGT7W-D46HsALjiJD1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFaVC8CY-i16_R76WxyWnowsZtBag&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PSxGT6CNC9OmsAKz0YjODg&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbpkYOBOeOJ-lcHqsV8mTLZ18FIA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12513007</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PSxGT6CNC9OmsAKz0YjODg&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbpkYOBOeOJ-lcHqsV8mTLZ18FIA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dwJGT_-lBsWrsQL1lIXlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-3uA3qQsycH5-670EG7V0GSpajQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12508997</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dwJGT_-lBsWrsQL1lIXlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-3uA3qQsycH5-670EG7V0GSpajQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4tdFT4j5OuqEsAKAuLXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVQwVSKoE4tcKoSE68WXspttNwWw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12507678</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4tdFT4j5OuqEsAKAuLXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVQwVSKoE4tcKoSE68WXspttNwWw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=t61FT7fcL9TfsQK425TEDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-kH5TVjmsYRZ523BjUoyi_NQpIg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12503987</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=t61FT7fcL9TfsQK425TEDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-kH5TVjmsYRZ523BjUoyi_NQpIg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dINFT97IFqbEsQL96v3DDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHWriPcKN62U60I9iknaUaykDxP5Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12501706</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dINFT97IFqbEsQL96v3DDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHWriPcKN62U60I9iknaUaykDxP5Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RFlFT8LaBeiCsALv66DDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKy5hoz37s80vmzp13kBibjWnRFA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12496714</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RFlFT8LaBeiCsALv66DDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKy5hoz37s80vmzp13kBibjWnRFA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gy9FT7zyCqOJsQKghfTCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKsQ8qpzskhtPtRegtH_Lo99_VTg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12490786</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gy9FT7zyCqOJsQKghfTCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKsQ8qpzskhtPtRegtH_Lo99_VTg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lAVFT6qEJ8SusQLN1YTDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE2NTDMrqwcxcNjDjIRqtUsze75Dg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12479284</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lAVFT6qEJ8SusQLN1YTDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE2NTDMrqwcxcNjDjIRqtUsze75Dg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ueJET_aOJ8X0sQLKn8zCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8OZzI60wTB-9c3T9ybK3jkzXAYQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12474773</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ueJET_aOJ8X0sQLKn8zCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8OZzI60wTB-9c3T9ybK3jkzXAYQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tNpET4jiGIuGsgKUtZzDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG_qCw1XB7P8KFPx6C6hznu0gchcA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12473724</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tNpET4jiGIuGsgKUtZzDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG_qCw1XB7P8KFPx6C6hznu0gchcA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6LBET_mqIejlsQKnts3CDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHatqQa2HZn5W58mNHs_AIN14OfMA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12470053</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6LBET_mqIejlsQKnts3CDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHatqQa2HZn5W58mNHs_AIN14OfMA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QIZET5PBGuHksQLx6IHDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG15GljtK1mCm_L28nK-eox5TKBpA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12468816</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QIZET5PBGuHksQLx6IHDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG15GljtK1mCm_L28nK-eox5TKBpA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OlxET6L6KtOlsALUsIXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG53N97lVKan7gob2OBbMDA1-rm1w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12465178</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OlxET6L6KtOlsALUsIXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG53N97lVKan7gob2OBbMDA1-rm1w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8DFET4y4FI6GsgLUuYDDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQl3_Ju5CFfVW71Z78J-SSTt3nPw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12464403</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8DFET4y4FI6GsgLUuYDDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQl3_Ju5CFfVW71Z78J-SSTt3nPw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2wdET8f5Mabe2AXI1qWZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcaLJ_1MlGXQVxeSVH4pQkcs1FcQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12460134</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2wdET8f5Mabe2AXI1qWZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcaLJ_1MlGXQVxeSVH4pQkcs1FcQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m91DT93DBMno2AXU-qHSBA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDMvva66JF-tY921FDALPsBE5vOw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12453558</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m91DT93DBMno2AXU-qHSBA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDMvva66JF-tY921FDALPsBE5vOw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QbRDT53oBY_vggeskbCGCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNErK87Bxrk2ag4GatSWH2zyMMk-Eg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12441751</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QbRDT53oBY_vggeskbCGCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNErK87Bxrk2ag4GatSWH2zyMMk-Eg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UolDT4mBE8a2gwf-nO2FDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE-r2-9EpqrM0dXcMGiBhWTDeJqDg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12436395</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UolDT4mBE8a2gwf-nO2FDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE-r2-9EpqrM0dXcMGiBhWTDeJqDg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pIdDT7yiJoPoggf4yNGYCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGGqvWWxNcyewD3ToB7-1PPQYvgrA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12436125</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pIdDT7yiJoPoggf4yNGYCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGGqvWWxNcyewD3ToB7-1PPQYvgrA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EF9DT8HRDeea2AWW6dSTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEkAbQxlWPH1eX6NAGoYwymKZmraA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12431477</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EF9DT8HRDeea2AWW6dSTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEkAbQxlWPH1eX6NAGoYwymKZmraA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2DRDT6X6IISy2QWwsLSiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFuwFrlcQju9fET1q_XI-vX098dGQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12430314</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2DRDT6X6IISy2QWwsLSiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFuwFrlcQju9fET1q_XI-vX098dGQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8QpDT_LsMaTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE-0YyqA7Z-dimB-b7FfU0-Vh8k9g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12426984</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8QpDT_LsMaTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE-0YyqA7Z-dimB-b7FfU0-Vh8k9g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r-BCT6X1C4iI2gW4p6GvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGLxKJubDJUz4pDLoo_jKgNaWvPig" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12426531</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r-BCT6X1C4iI2gW4p6GvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGLxKJubDJUz4pDLoo_jKgNaWvPig&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W7ZCT_i8HsTC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHnx6WOZoSPxg9YWoJgIym_6--zZQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12422649</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W7ZCT_i8HsTC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHnx6WOZoSPxg9YWoJgIym_6--zZQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JYxCT_fGJMbg2AXO66ymCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnh1WS-KN6tiIh6O96sL4Xs-0S_Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12416222</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JYxCT_fGJMbg2AXO66ymCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnh1WS-KN6tiIh6O96sL4Xs-0S_Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UWJCT-zXOqW62gXGpZS0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHuXDCDybzJjcGgLuIeXqOgftW_NA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12404237</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UWJCT-zXOqW62gXGpZS0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHuXDCDybzJjcGgLuIeXqOgftW_NA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzdCT_vlOeKC2wXYmcWvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF8-58-F9N6lrRjzK1LNtofZQHZVQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12398579</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzdCT_vlOeKC2wXYmcWvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF8-58-F9N6lrRjzK1LNtofZQHZVQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xDNCT7ilLofU2AW6oKjCCw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGGVxPK9_aarjw4p7dcFIhLBVP1Hw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12397945</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xDNCT7ilLofU2AW6oKjCCw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGGVxPK9_aarjw4p7dcFIhLBVP1Hw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gQ1CT5WDHqTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqAk1H_-zKYislNg_qfsEEDp4Uzw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12393495</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gQ1CT5WDHqTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqAk1H_-zKYislNg_qfsEEDp4Uzw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R-NBT-igL4XY2QXS7JSDCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoG2JUpjpGe1y6q2tdg8YKAAAuMg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12392265</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R-NBT-igL4XY2QXS7JSDCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoG2JUpjpGe1y6q2tdg8YKAAAuMg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R7lBT4udNcr02QWD2OGZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH68N1yS7YqMnQl1V8vWP3jzjjJBw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12389161</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R7lBT4udNcr02QWD2OGZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH68N1yS7YqMnQl1V8vWP3jzjjJBw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GY9BT-ylPOOQ2QWH_YykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEyqojPnq5QCq23eNUNPPScOSnSUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12389056</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GY9BT-ylPOOQ2QWH_YykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEyqojPnq5QCq23eNUNPPScOSnSUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5mRBT6bBCKLM2AX_x9H_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSLR8Pe5KstbItYfhH0mErocaN_g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12385081</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5mRBT6bBCKLM2AX_x9H_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSLR8Pe5KstbItYfhH0mErocaN_g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vDpBT-zzH-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6By5uhOozsr2AxoucwpavJ9jnGA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12378624</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vDpBT-zzH-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6By5uhOozsr2AxoucwpavJ9jnGA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jhBBT7KhDujo2gWLo92kCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGHdSCo748BUhCl4eiyy45gIGzp-A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12366547</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jhBBT7KhDujo2gWLo92kCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGHdSCo748BUhCl4eiyy45gIGzp-A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XeZAT-DqF4ni2AW7htydCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFd69zZXF5e51tQxH4xkWFJOHfgQQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12360835</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XeZAT-DqF4ni2AW7htydCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFd69zZXF5e51tQxH4xkWFJOHfgQQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=peFAT7vED-bc2QWz09moDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGLGI-Kmiiz5SGNM3I5aIfq1uKUjQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12360104</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=peFAT7vED-bc2QWz09moDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGLGI-Kmiiz5SGNM3I5aIfq1uKUjQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-LtAT7u1EqWe2AWK2KybCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGqGbJ81xVKf91xTeDWZCKU2O53zw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12355617</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-LtAT7u1EqWe2AWK2KybCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGqGbJ81xVKf91xTeDWZCKU2O53zw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0JFAT66vJMv-2QWH1IGICA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESDXq1H-OLjq9NxIP4zDHg_93r6w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12354344</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0JFAT66vJMv-2QWH1IGICA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESDXq1H-OLjq9NxIP4zDHg_93r6w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=52dAT8OWNbPE2QWxwKyfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2Mnj4Hpti3KpkECV1RlueBFpujQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12350943</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=52dAT8OWNbPE2QWxwKyfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2Mnj4Hpti3KpkECV1RlueBFpujQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oz1AT6LMFsLy2QXPpK2DCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZ5UeA5PRy6o54KhfhLnDUOJ1_EA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12350818</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oz1AT6LMFsLy2QXPpK2DCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZ5UeA5PRy6o54KhfhLnDUOJ1_EA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XRNAT8ToJsOg2gXrs_mPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHuYQSf-nF_AH6cNLMGeQcWjq16gw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12346806</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XRNAT8ToJsOg2gXrs_mPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHuYQSf-nF_AH6cNLMGeQcWjq16gw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J-k_T8SzBeiK2wWLv_maCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGoShTE1bfwSW_8E5RnD3uu_DZkxA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12339913</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J-k_T8SzBeiK2wWLv_maCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGoShTE1bfwSW_8E5RnD3uu_DZkxA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AL8_T5HWLaeQ2QXO2LywCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNErmTJCJAyvnnyZ5yibZ5rSPoivOw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12327635</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AL8_T5HWLaeQ2QXO2LywCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNErmTJCJAyvnnyZ5yibZ5rSPoivOw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vZQ_T_64Iafs2QX-qcCfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZ11VIvBLHjPbClhOEsij8rD-LUw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12322023</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vZQ_T_64Iafs2QX-qcCfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZ11VIvBLHjPbClhOEsij8rD-LUw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=npE_T5q6DoPg2AXB5MG2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFZY5nWJlqlMb1PQtf76n3nA_IFw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12321488</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=npE_T5q6DoPg2AXB5MG2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFZY5nWJlqlMb1PQtf76n3nA_IFw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qmo_T6qfMIO42wW59bWVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFpvO2KUFhFDb4ixRRimWRl-AjF8w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12316933</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qmo_T6qfMIO42wW59bWVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFpvO2KUFhFDb4ixRRimWRl-AjF8w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZEA_T-KzIcW42wWj74WiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhIKrCl7Ukn9oTAxsvueDrQ5QAcQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12315731</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZEA_T-KzIcW42wWj74WiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhIKrCl7Ukn9oTAxsvueDrQ5QAcQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eBw_T_mVDLO42QWy7I2oCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9rfRUL7YkTCt_hi-Pb34WP3Br8g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12307377</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eBw_T_mVDLO42QWy7I2oCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9rfRUL7YkTCt_hi-Pb34WP3Br8g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cuw-T6SqJ-v-2QXlhpyBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFjGLlqyUvGKILeJJotOq9aWHa7IQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12303599</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cuw-T6SqJ-v-2QXlhpyBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFjGLlqyUvGKILeJJotOq9aWHa7IQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2cE-T_rUEoW42QXF6LmtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNExfJERL8NJHRaw9cPBro8E6HjVbw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12297800</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2cE-T_rUEoW42QXF6LmtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNExfJERL8NJHRaw9cPBro8E6HjVbw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rZc-T9zMCcLW2AWWt_WzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF3benDwhPOUbKS3O_vAkJGk8XJQA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12290149</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rZc-T9zMCcLW2AWWt_WzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF3benDwhPOUbKS3O_vAkJGk8XJQA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Fm4-T_rsAeLE2wXh5KipCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtodvws_zYfaYlgLR4Vtuq9nhVZw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12281098</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Fm4-T_rsAeLE2wXh5KipCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtodvws_zYfaYlgLR4Vtuq9nhVZw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jUs-T8GNIqPo2AWO7bm4CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPbqnEEVBes4CvZs-eFWabLfaBdQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12279297</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jUs-T8GNIqPo2AWO7bm4CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPbqnEEVBes4CvZs-eFWabLfaBdQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nkM-T5SXE4XI2AX7itDrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGU9HY7h0ptkp0bQ0v-E4K0j61Vbg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12278802</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nkM-T5SXE4XI2AX7itDrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGU9HY7h0ptkp0bQ0v-E4K0j61Vbg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mhk-T6-3G8e62gXvremSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGT6YdjN-LxtsGuAo7hnOLANVY91Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12274718</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mhk-T6-3G8e62gXvremSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGT6YdjN-LxtsGuAo7hnOLANVY91Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gu89T7i-NuKW2QXIx7GrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEH3msLcp-V4WFJ9t2wq3J_ipmFCw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12271322</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gu89T7i-NuKW2QXIx7GrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEH3msLcp-V4WFJ9t2wq3J_ipmFCw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0sQ9T8fuBcSG2gXvmcyVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFoj4Ow2XHwZPS253RkUfKbPZ4odg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12261121</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0sQ9T8fuBcSG2gXvmcyVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFoj4Ow2XHwZPS253RkUfKbPZ4odg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lZo9T_H1F8TC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGoja4JjxZ20ZC37b_f3oFLCZQk5w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12257494</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lZo9T_H1F8TC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGoja4JjxZ20ZC37b_f3oFLCZQk5w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uHA9T6-CO-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQxTOciqKQoKYZJH0eCAvvQoMhZw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12253886</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uHA9T6-CO-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQxTOciqKQoKYZJH0eCAvvQoMhZw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NUY9T-DKBdG_2QWMhpGdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfyYWoWbszT_LqHqsbBl82z2pYtg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12247413</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NUY9T-DKBdG_2QWMhpGdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfyYWoWbszT_LqHqsbBl82z2pYtg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HRw9T8_tNsnY2QXc_pmsCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHM2l_XMtyNVc2Y1672MzIJd5Ospw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12240242</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HRw9T8_tNsnY2QXc_pmsCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHM2l_XMtyNVc2Y1672MzIJd5Ospw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8PE8T7PEOYjo2gW4vcCBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHAYzWb9obgrHcRF3IC7rTkGRWsLA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12236596</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8PE8T7PEOYjo2gW4vcCBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHAYzWb9obgrHcRF3IC7rTkGRWsLA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_PA8T4jeDOSK2wXBo4WtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4YFwJRpyS4XgsEyJ2fRuV4DVrfA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12236434</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_PA8T4jeDOSK2wXBo4WtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4YFwJRpyS4XgsEyJ2fRuV4DVrfA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zcc8T8-PBvSr2AWJz4GVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHeb2fNzmcmp9DHpX4HHwmV5DLJ6A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12232049</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zcc8T8-PBvSr2AWJz4GVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHeb2fNzmcmp9DHpX4HHwmV5DLJ6A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PJ08T7W1Isjq2AXymsD_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF6dQo7z1jipldGF8AFjDV72YahoQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12230814</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PJ08T7W1Isjq2AXymsD_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF6dQo7z1jipldGF8AFjDV72YahoQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXM8T5zqDuTW2AWI2InzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH3YLElW39sahwv11HT64RPOps7EA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12226102</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXM8T5zqDuTW2AWI2InzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH3YLElW39sahwv11HT64RPOps7EA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6Ug8T93nHqOL2AX6pL3zBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHI4Gwq5DlPPVvcwGXyYlSIxRhoqg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12225984</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6Ug8T93nHqOL2AX6pL3zBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHI4Gwq5DlPPVvcwGXyYlSIxRhoqg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vx48T-nFJoLu2gWeibTzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGWXRncYXFqmA58dKMNl3B5LzQmwA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12225848</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vx48T-nFJoLu2gWeibTzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGWXRncYXFqmA58dKMNl3B5LzQmwA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RqA7T5uYFeWZ2QXq2LnzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG1gyL7LtvxGUXOgvLhzUdqXsrHnQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12224872</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RqA7T5uYFeWZ2QXq2LnzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG1gyL7LtvxGUXOgvLhzUdqXsrHnQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XJo7T5jyB8jE2QWRyanzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElA42_S_KEEtPRbTL1J5wb-Rxkdg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12224129</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XJo7T5jyB8jE2QWRyanzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElA42_S_KEEtPRbTL1J5wb-Rxkdg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXY7T_W0G8fWtgeE-YnMCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH78qLeZ8G8zIge1srMMtdLK_kzAg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12219874</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXY7T_W0G8fWtgeE-YnMCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH78qLeZ8G8zIge1srMMtdLK_kzAg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Es7T5iyBKrO2AXVnejMCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGg6T9ey7oBVFIk0k9jja8qQmHCPg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12218629</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Es7T5iyBKrO2AXVnejMCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGg6T9ey7oBVFIk0k9jja8qQmHCPg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=viE7T-6_Jabg2QXppPSRCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4lxU_uXnSKwu-hnRA6oNr_uMjag" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12209674</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=viE7T-6_Jabg2QXppPSRCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4lxU_uXnSKwu-hnRA6oNr_uMjag&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ePc6T5jkMqro2QW75Jm_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzYJWv5uFGBnTjlFSMMJWk6n37vA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12206824</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ePc6T5jkMqro2QW75Jm_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzYJWv5uFGBnTjlFSMMJWk6n37vA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W806T_qeDYz22AXA-bS5Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrjd6gGksK452OB6gSQexooYSCPw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12202814</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W806T_qeDYz22AXA-bS5Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrjd6gGksK452OB6gSQexooYSCPw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LqM6T4_kLab82gXE9LGjCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1waJmp_rb23ht39vvZOxBQXDj-Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12196831</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LqM6T4_kLab82gXE9LGjCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1waJmp_rb23ht39vvZOxBQXDj-Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-3g6T6bcPOKC2wWmnvDCCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPFAkuxbVAagH2abdo08g2wihv0w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12186120</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-3g6T6bcPOKC2wWmnvDCCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPFAkuxbVAagH2abdo08g2wihv0w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yk46T9f4CcOA2QWo1tSXCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVJ9vtxBYm3cyXr-J7HdgMDCPZfw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12182310</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yk46T9f4CcOA2QWo1tSXCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVJ9vtxBYm3cyXr-J7HdgMDCPZfw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ikw6T9DoAYb82gWHxPyTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXz1i0eFNHUj7qXtjXryjqCX7sWg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12182016</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ikw6T9DoAYb82gWHxPyTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXz1i0eFNHUj7qXtjXryjqCX7sWg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aCQ6T63MG8Ho2gX86L2VCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrLiWaNhq0YKJmIZdThHbFavkIVw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12177784</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aCQ6T63MG8Ho2gX86L2VCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrLiWaNhq0YKJmIZdThHbFavkIVw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zvo5T7TECabY2gXJlKW_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjGKSj20ANy_S-oi_f8oMOxvRaZA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12176690</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zvo5T7TECabY2gXJlKW_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjGKSj20ANy_S-oi_f8oMOxvRaZA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O9A5T4yPJ-PY2AWX0N2vCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHeejwZpWREc6o1MFK2L8xo5anJQw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12172066</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O9A5T4yPJ-PY2AWX0N2vCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHeejwZpWREc6o1MFK2L8xo5anJQw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_KU5T9HOCM7E2QWay7WbCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHEijmAGa1q66FNEGzn3cacXI0ySg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12169321</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_KU5T9HOCM7E2QWay7WbCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHEijmAGa1q66FNEGzn3cacXI0ySg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zns5T6GfGtH-2QXc7ozQDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHCLjxFqDS7-3hGNiTRnmk_Pn9FSQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12164736</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zns5T6GfGtH-2QXc7ozQDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHCLjxFqDS7-3hGNiTRnmk_Pn9FSQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rlE5T_yLNIrDsQLI7sCpAg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHDj5SFUCSkdYjiJ4G1VikDorJjEA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12158634</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rlE5T_yLNIrDsQLI7sCpAg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHDj5SFUCSkdYjiJ4G1VikDorJjEA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GCg5T5e3FLLE2QXaiP2EAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGBSQ_L6NjoDpZa0E4ro71wz6ZAEA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12147494</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GCg5T5e3FLLE2QXaiP2EAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGBSQ_L6NjoDpZa0E4ro71wz6ZAEA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tv04T7TnOoLu2gXj-YWZAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDaa1AmJlEcIlPZ1si9cGYsLtF6A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12142956</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tv04T7TnOoLu2gXj-YWZAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDaa1AmJlEcIlPZ1si9cGYsLtF6A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ffo4T-TzG631sQKD_bH2AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGsyjJ-Fqlv-rRIwE13ZdsvefUvTw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12142515</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ffo4T-TzG631sQKD_bH2AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGsyjJ-Fqlv-rRIwE13ZdsvefUvTw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_NI4T_c5ioKwAtaNpYsC&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEa2F2nAVhDQR34laHQMUW0BBNXkw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12138117</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_NI4T_c5ioKwAtaNpYsC&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEa2F2nAVhDQR34laHQMUW0BBNXkw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wKg4T-m8FOqasgKSmMSDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-YxZmpEvNGWSSNhyN1mVoB_LR4Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12137048</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wKg4T-m8FOqasgKSmMSDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-YxZmpEvNGWSSNhyN1mVoB_LR4Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lX44T7mOB4qW2gWxz5H5AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHngoE9bQ7EjEdTkOy87gLWSM_aSg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12129943</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lX44T7mOB4qW2gWxz5H5AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHngoE9bQ7EjEdTkOy87gLWSM_aSg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=c1Q4T-_mI-nM2AXPlt2UAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFbWncI6KLGs0V0CbEDwlSvBK3zHg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12129819</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=c1Q4T-_mI-nM2AXPlt2UAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFbWncI6KLGs0V0CbEDwlSvBK3zHg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SCo4T9CjCMfK2AWj9aTzAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFprhzfe4i-UwKxfkAIkESJWKHabw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12129648</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SCo4T9CjCMfK2AWj9aTzAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFprhzfe4i-UwKxfkAIkESJWKHabw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Jjs0T6TzMqqesQLnooX-AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKOOshdNvB6lRoi7msTpK52EcEqg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12127928</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Jjs0T6TzMqqesQLnooX-AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKOOshdNvB6lRoi7msTpK52EcEqg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uTgzT4qwKKWGsAKJpd2wAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFjbmJ8Y3xNP0Agoa8UPzqR9bKC1Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12123533</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uTgzT4qwKKWGsAKJpd2wAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFjbmJ8Y3xNP0Agoa8UPzqR9bKC1Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uTgzT4qwKKWGsAKJpd2wAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmahBpC3k8112h0nBmR7osehyn_A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12123530</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ccw10099</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. Posted 2nd December 2011 by Ventura free. 0. Add a comment. Add comment. No more comments. tatoott1009 1776. Magazine. Classic &amp;middot; Flipcard &amp;middot; Magazine ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uTgzT4qwKKWGsAKJpd2wAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmahBpC3k8112h0nBmR7osehyn_A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hg4zT-DMBrSA2QXQ_rTGBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHwmqq5Rd7KSdUAocCA0nsM_micGw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12122037</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hg4zT-DMBrSA2QXQ_rTGBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHwmqq5Rd7KSdUAocCA0nsM_micGw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hg4zT-DMBrSA2QXQ_rTGBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHonIfdzHGCX1n7LHv2UwdepnGccw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12122035</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ccw10099</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. Posted 2nd December 2011 by Ventura free. 0. Add a comment. Add comment. No more comments. tatoott1009 1776. Magazine. Classic &amp;middot; Flipcard &amp;middot; Magazine ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hg4zT-DMBrSA2QXQ_rTGBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHonIfdzHGCX1n7LHv2UwdepnGccw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuQyT67-F-Xo2AXbm4HLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5hnXtPGuGUfTt-jSUvQuRDauZkQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12117291</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuQyT67-F-Xo2AXbm4HLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5hnXtPGuGUfTt-jSUvQuRDauZkQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuQyT67-F-Xo2AXbm4HLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFjlHMcWC1vVpzpmL1xWfLD5bi_Og" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12117289</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ccw10099</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. Posted 2nd December 2011 by Ventura free. 0. Add a comment. Add comment. No more comments. tatoott1009 1776. Magazine. Classic &amp;middot; Flipcard &amp;middot; Magazine ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuQyT67-F-Xo2AXbm4HLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFjlHMcWC1vVpzpmL1xWfLD5bi_Og&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J7oyT9mlFMKK2wWK9bi7Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4rdK7RSTRwoNwwdnJZabUMN-OUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12110356</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J7oyT9mlFMKK2wWK9bi7Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4rdK7RSTRwoNwwdnJZabUMN-OUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J7oyT9mlFMKK2wWK9bi7Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFyPyxxJTG4oFH-oc32C80Ihr2SfA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12110354</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ccw10099</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. Posted 2nd December 2011 by Ventura free. 0. Add a comment. Add comment. No more comments. tatoott1009 1776. Magazine. Classic &amp;middot; Flipcard &amp;middot; Magazine ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J7oyT9mlFMKK2wWK9bi7Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFyPyxxJTG4oFH-oc32C80Ihr2SfA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=x5AyT8SOB8WzsALO84yxDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnh7iEbh3bFiEIfgwHK0wr0J9hvg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12098497</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=x5AyT8SOB8WzsALO84yxDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnh7iEbh3bFiEIfgwHK0wr0J9hvg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=x5AyT8SOB8WzsALO84yxDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUlaNoGzhGJuhuXL9QosRwKCgywA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12098493</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ccw10099</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. Posted 2nd December 2011 by Ventura free. 0. Add a comment. Add comment. No more comments. tatoott1009 1776. Magazine. Classic &amp;middot; Flipcard &amp;middot; Magazine ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=x5AyT8SOB8WzsALO84yxDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUlaNoGzhGJuhuXL9QosRwKCgywA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zWUyT4LrA8mpsAKWxPGBBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHi6_ceZ7tQiF1EB2KaMPqCWZLYpg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12093816</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zWUyT4LrA8mpsAKWxPGBBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHi6_ceZ7tQiF1EB2KaMPqCWZLYpg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zWUyT4LrA8mpsAKWxPGBBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHEb9rosKMrbpBgH9DolSt9lZpnNg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12093813</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ccw10099</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. Posted 2nd December 2011 by Ventura free. 0. Add a comment. Add comment. No more comments. tatoott1009 1776. Magazine. Classic &amp;middot; Flipcard &amp;middot; Magazine ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zWUyT4LrA8mpsAKWxPGBBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHEb9rosKMrbpBgH9DolSt9lZpnNg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m14yT6TbFcyLsAKEoMXrBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEZbbMkkH1IJ-FHhJlDFxN-09RKKg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12092791</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m14yT6TbFcyLsAKEoMXrBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEZbbMkkH1IJ-FHhJlDFxN-09RKKg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m14yT6TbFcyLsAKEoMXrBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWNoO_PAOPuYeCobsS9wn3wgFSrA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12092788</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ccw10099</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. Posted 2nd December 2011 by Ventura free. 0. Add a comment. Add comment. No more comments. tatoott1009 1776. Magazine. Classic &amp;middot; Flipcard &amp;middot; Magazine ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m14yT6TbFcyLsAKEoMXrBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWNoO_PAOPuYeCobsS9wn3wgFSrA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjsyT6O2NYXY2QXvvLSxBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHRCfo3pV7ay7szxJcrV7IOPHQt4w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12088774</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjsyT6O2NYXY2QXvvLSxBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHRCfo3pV7ay7szxJcrV7IOPHQt4w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjsyT6O2NYXY2QXvvLSxBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrJBvrjO1pPMTC6bX2tnWmTY5r9w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12088772</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ccw10099</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. Posted 2nd December 2011 by Ventura free. 0. Add a comment. Add comment. No more comments. tatoott1009 1776. Magazine. Classic &amp;middot; Flipcard &amp;middot; Magazine ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjsyT6O2NYXY2QXvvLSxBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrJBvrjO1pPMTC6bX2tnWmTY5r9w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UhEyT5_nJKX9sQKjqeCFBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGlbf7RgqlUy9mwZMN4Qw6Yd_G5Ng" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12087166</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UhEyT5_nJKX9sQKjqeCFBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGlbf7RgqlUy9mwZMN4Qw6Yd_G5Ng&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UhEyT5_nJKX9sQKjqeCFBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8xaqYmjjzjjkJCtmGwvP3H0Qffg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12087163</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ccw10099</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. Posted 2nd December 2011 by Ventura free. 0. Add a comment. Add comment. No more comments. tatoott1009 1776. Magazine. Classic &amp;middot; Flipcard &amp;middot; Magazine ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UhEyT5_nJKX9sQKjqeCFBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8xaqYmjjzjjkJCtmGwvP3H0Qffg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HOcxT5vNOaaIsQKfhpThBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXorPNOjhjHvn7wiFs8dQ8_03XWg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12082960</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HOcxT5vNOaaIsQKfhpThBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXorPNOjhjHvn7wiFs8dQ8_03XWg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HOcxT5vNOaaIsQKfhpThBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEPCpqZf17T9s1VfCcHGos6FlQeEg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12082957</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ccw10099</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. Posted 2nd December 2011 by Ventura free. 0. Add a comment. Add comment. No more comments. tatoott1009 1776. Magazine. Classic &amp;middot; Flipcard &amp;middot; Magazine ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HOcxT5vNOaaIsQKfhpThBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEPCpqZf17T9s1VfCcHGos6FlQeEg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A70xT_q7LOmIsgKlhIjnBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHVecexOimguIP0NMem_HpJjnr-zg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12082797</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A70xT_q7LOmIsgKlhIjnBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHVecexOimguIP0NMem_HpJjnr-zg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A70xT_q7LOmIsgKlhIjnBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEgwMFwTt2A97pvFVW0IAYG5YJiYQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12082794</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ccw10099</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. Posted 2nd December 2011 by Ventura free. 0. Add a comment. Add comment. No more comments. tatoott1009 1776. Magazine. Classic &amp;middot; Flipcard &amp;middot; Magazine ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A70xT_q7LOmIsgKlhIjnBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEgwMFwTt2A97pvFVW0IAYG5YJiYQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4ZIxT-_5GZKNsAKT3a2cBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGyLNZpsim7SvXt_okz0fwfqSeR7Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12082580</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4ZIxT-_5GZKNsAKT3a2cBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGyLNZpsim7SvXt_okz0fwfqSeR7Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4ZIxT-_5GZKNsAKT3a2cBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGClJisaYoTcgMq9Hj8XFV24aRLMg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12082577</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ccw10099</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867...NDAA (Late on 121) .avi. Posted 2nd December 2011 by Ventura free. 0. Add a comment. Add comment. No more comments. tatoott1009 1776. Magazine. Classic &amp;middot; Flipcard &amp;middot; Magazine ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ccw10099.blogspot.com/2011/12/urgent-alert-senate-has-now-passed.html%3Fz&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4ZIxT-_5GZKNsAKT3a2cBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGClJisaYoTcgMq9Hj8XFV24aRLMg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tj8xT4DkCYetsQLFpMHiBg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlwfSXtumBbEqZNekgbaeBjgmo_Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12076284</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tj8xT4DkCYetsQLFpMHiBg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlwfSXtumBbEqZNekgbaeBjgmo_Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kCMxT-TeO4SPsQKH7MiPBw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGqjyB2HmK_nodXgRsIwnNGVxlirA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12076149</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kCMxT-TeO4SPsQKH7MiPBw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGqjyB2HmK_nodXgRsIwnNGVxlirA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KxcwT5z1AcjA2gXf5tiKDw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELW56jGHBSLgCBY-Tn-4cUHK17Pg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12065704</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KxcwT5z1AcjA2gXf5tiKDw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELW56jGHBSLgCBY-Tn-4cUHK17Pg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8uwvT_ylBsSRsALsiN2ADg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhOx3dLirb19rJu0o4r2Z7bcr5Kg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12053967</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8uwvT_ylBsSRsALsiN2ADg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhOx3dLirb19rJu0o4r2Z7bcr5Kg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ucIvT9OLJKSCsgLymPyyDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6Kuw8WQFXyvqLyzrAxsPq8S505A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12048826</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ucIvT9OLJKSCsgLymPyyDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6Kuw8WQFXyvqLyzrAxsPq8S505A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PLQvT8nMK4arsALLvr2SDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvNqHhtKSKdZ-2Y096h4W16QsC9g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12046561</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PLQvT8nMK4arsALLvr2SDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvNqHhtKSKdZ-2Y096h4W16QsC9g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bZgvT8PvOebC2wWuy4ThDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzP2CEmeCRTnJNxuNGlV8F-XUE1Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12043025</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bZgvT8PvOebC2wWuy4ThDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzP2CEmeCRTnJNxuNGlV8F-XUE1Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Um4vT96RFeWksQKu9ciJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1l50jAG1GhFWmEj-pCoqBl7I87g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12041329</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Um4vT96RFeWksQKu9ciJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1l50jAG1GhFWmEj-pCoqBl7I87g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FkQvT8nqB8OJsgL56cW-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGOAVOvH9tviOffYP7N8VJ1uI0EuA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12038226</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FkQvT8nqB8OJsgL56cW-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGOAVOvH9tviOffYP7N8VJ1uI0EuA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1hkvT6CxE82GsALz-uCdDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH2eBELRzfwl-o3gc65WyalYLbNfQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12038098</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1hkvT6CxE82GsALz-uCdDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH2eBELRzfwl-o3gc65WyalYLbNfQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z-8uT6T5Ja7IsQLuuJWjDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhPAtoXmBeqTDentNOr0TlhElEOA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12037967</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z-8uT6T5Ja7IsQLuuJWjDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhPAtoXmBeqTDentNOr0TlhElEOA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jMUuT6nkL7Cl2AXO5LnrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFX4Rh9Hlso8HLpHZVAMEKq34iIUw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12037054</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jMUuT6nkL7Cl2AXO5LnrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFX4Rh9Hlso8HLpHZVAMEKq34iIUw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=apsuT92DCqfs2QX43Z2ADw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEujTk9KaafYFAG3xb0oRJLNetb5g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12027168</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=apsuT92DCqfs2QX43Z2ADw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEujTk9KaafYFAG3xb0oRJLNetb5g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P3EuT7SlBoPnsQLSq92hDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFax4CIDa1kQtS9IiVQ7yeE5tqx7Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12022370</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P3EuT7SlBoPnsQLSq92hDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFax4CIDa1kQtS9IiVQ7yeE5tqx7Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gGYuT-DQN-rFsQLDrpXrDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHX974YX_bZhTOBUcSlR8TI8DGgWg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12021054</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gGYuT-DQN-rFsQLDrpXrDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHX974YX_bZhTOBUcSlR8TI8DGgWg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=30YuT9aRA6LpsQKnzMD_DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMxqKGkW-JrRlX0VCf1Yhpgi-OlQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12017456</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=30YuT9aRA6LpsQKnzMD_DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMxqKGkW-JrRlX0VCf1Yhpgi-OlQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rhwuT5PqE5SisQL7-aHFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrbjyF-Voj7JBDPi5zug8UuSWDEA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12015745</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rhwuT5PqE5SisQL7-aHFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrbjyF-Voj7JBDPi5zug8UuSWDEA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oPItT9isL9H82gXPr63iDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGEQJsBdmIRs_BYFq4ED2ZdnnOxkA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12012547</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oPItT9isL9H82gXPr63iDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGEQJsBdmIRs_BYFq4ED2ZdnnOxkA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ccgtT-3uBqnA2gX7-P3qDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjy5Mwi_YsEAqZgeWyoG8vHqsdHg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12011703</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ccgtT-3uBqnA2gX7-P3qDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjy5Mwi_YsEAqZgeWyoG8vHqsdHg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TJ4tT-HeBsSRsALsiN2ADg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHUHkMkh7TQok32qYsPtV0gjkhWVQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12007530</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TJ4tT-HeBsSRsALsiN2ADg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHUHkMkh7TQok32qYsPtV0gjkhWVQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F3QtT9PDF8H22AWUhqWLDw&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFqF6GWajKNLxl1Rn_M8bmyUjvYNg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/12000743</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F3QtT9PDF8H22AWUhqWLDw&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFqF6GWajKNLxl1Rn_M8bmyUjvYNg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=60ktT7bEOYfg2QWh3Y2XDw&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHj8L3oH4kxIuVsS-vmE5NfZBJIOg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11988884</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=60ktT7bEOYfg2QWh3Y2XDw&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHj8L3oH4kxIuVsS-vmE5NfZBJIOg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wh8tT4uZNoazsAK0vPSJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4V7L0X2rlrRcXT35yj1EhA7zYqQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11983376</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wh8tT4uZNoazsAK0vPSJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4V7L0X2rlrRcXT35yj1EhA7zYqQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rhctT_y-B6OIsgKM_LGWDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGTRMDBvM3MiS0B9yU_fWqYhBb54Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11982203</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rhctT_y-B6OIsgKM_LGWDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGTRMDBvM3MiS0B9yU_fWqYhBb54Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YvUsT57NMs_5sQLUrcy7Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1OYZz8Eew0tnmzTEVhoWMxf-iYw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11978355</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YvUsT57NMs_5sQLUrcy7Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1OYZz8Eew0tnmzTEVhoWMxf-iYw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=V8ssT5H0O9HHsQLJm8DBDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFayRYB5c5qI5DvjkVYuKiOom6dUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11976856</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=V8ssT5H0O9HHsQLJm8DBDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFayRYB5c5qI5DvjkVYuKiOom6dUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FKEsT669EPP3sQL_s9WJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4e2xJ5XjMRhjmPkNlGZTipqUW0w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11972744</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FKEsT669EPP3sQL_s9WJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4e2xJ5XjMRhjmPkNlGZTipqUW0w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BXcsT9XfBOzhsQKl3dSoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoKXp5sQ3PYZcIbK8Izm3ffIrR9w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11972528</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BXcsT9XfBOzhsQKl3dSoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoKXp5sQ3PYZcIbK8Izm3ffIrR9w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v0wsT-K8Aqm62gXivNzrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXbiIVjXmIsRvg1xRB-ExifRRWsg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11972251</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v0wsT-K8Aqm62gXivNzrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXbiIVjXmIsRvg1xRB-ExifRRWsg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SfgrT_DJIMnq2wWh6oCfDw&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRWLuUid5kmc99L6CqNhoT4P8RGg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11963639</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SfgrT_DJIMnq2wWh6oCfDw&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRWLuUid5kmc99L6CqNhoT4P8RGg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MM4rT_GMJYWQsQLc85WlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELp-4g35FxuD2XQbfnsZw_WgSQAQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11963475</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MM4rT_GMJYWQsQLc85WlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELp-4g35FxuD2XQbfnsZw_WgSQAQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MCspT_DcOYfq2AXw_f28BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1_zvjBFESFE8EdiU3wMta3-5dpA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11943532</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MCspT_DcOYfq2AXw_f28BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1_zvjBFESFE8EdiU3wMta3-5dpA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dh4pT6fYDaGGsgLf2-njAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvrUCMkUP3z1lWpALfsukXjNu3uw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11941751</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dh4pT6fYDaGGsgLf2-njAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvrUCMkUP3z1lWpALfsukXjNu3uw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8gApT_mBPbSmsQKgzb3nAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHK46EgSBIRlO7_SAY3lEZv3mGI6Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11938421</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8gApT_mBPbSmsQKgzb3nAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHK46EgSBIRlO7_SAY3lEZv3mGI6Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Call to Action! National Defense Authorization Act (S.1867) Makes ...</title>
    <link href="http://occupyoakland.org/2011/12/call-to-action-national-defense-authorization-act-s-1867-makes-america-a-police-state/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11579810</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.occupyoakland.org/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Last night (12/1) the United States Senate voted 93-7 to pass the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (S.1867), which must now be reconciled with a House-passed version (H.R.1540). Here is the bill: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://occupyoakland.org/2011/12/call-to-action-national-defense-authorization-act-s-1867-makes-america-a-police-state/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &#8211; And Now&#8230; For the Rest.. of the Story &#171; American Everyman</title>
    <link href="http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2011/12/02/s-1867-and-now-for-the-rest-of-the-story/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11431588</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>willyloman</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Note: Let it be known that I do not support these sections of S. 1867 as written. I just think we need to consider the rest of the story before doing the bidding of Obama and the FBI. The internets are abuzz with end-times ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2011/12/02/s-1867-and-now-for-the-rest-of-the-story/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Bill Passes Senate 93-7 &#8211; Elite ...</title>
    <link href="http://elitemultimedia.mobi/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention%E2%80%99-bill-passes-senate-93-7/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11431587</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>EliteMultimedia</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1867. Another amendment introduced by Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Dianne Feinstein that attempted to bar the provision from being used on American soil, an effort to ensure &#8220;the military won&amp;#39;t be roaming ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://elitemultimedia.mobi/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention%E2%80%99-bill-passes-senate-93-7/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sipsey Street Irregulars: &amp;quot;S.1867: Just another brick in the police ...</title>
    <link href="http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2011/12/s1867-just-another-brick-in-police.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11431586</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Dutchman6</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
My recent article on S.1867 elicited comments to the effect that a few commenters had read the bill and that I was simply being inflammatory and emotional. Yes&#8230;..of course&#8230;.that must be it. Lest anyone forget: * The insidious ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2011/12/s1867-just-another-brick-in-police.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &amp;#39;Indefinite Detention&amp;#39; Defense Bill Passes Senate</title>
    <link href="http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11431585</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Conservative Action Alerts</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s official: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, S. 1867, passed the Senate yesterday, December 1. The Upper Chamber passed the bill with 93 ayes and 7 nays, the whole Senate voted and needed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/12/s-1867-indefinite-detention-defense-bill-passes-senate/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 &#171; Occupy Tacoma</title>
    <link href="http://occupytacoma.org/2011/s-1867-2/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-02:/commentary/11431580</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CherylTheVeteran</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1867. Posted December 2nd, 2011. (Posted at Yvonne Sevillle&amp;#39;s request). &#8220;URGENT &#8211; This bill could potentially have an damaging effect on activists.&#8221; &#8220;Given the recent unrest, use of civil disobedience, and talks of more. I wouldn&amp;#39;t put i&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://occupytacoma.org/2011/s-1867-2/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RsmPT5XHI-bK2AXepYWcBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH4sTPfzh5bBxaOym3XYZQ9iDg62A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/14595448</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RsmPT5XHI-bK2AXepYWcBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH4sTPfzh5bBxaOym3XYZQ9iDg62A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M_6OT8TrHeq02gXC_dTnCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHEgFHHa-ag8lVTV41R-NNChxt_VQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/14575090</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M_6OT8TrHeq02gXC_dTnCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHEgFHHa-ag8lVTV41R-NNChxt_VQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aQCMT9gWpszYBce9mM4J&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHc_8iTHBa0qGPLnuTYKHB53HrK9A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/14496807</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aQCMT9gWpszYBce9mM4J&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHc_8iTHBa0qGPLnuTYKHB53HrK9A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eK2KT6-sNqmC2gWduYW-CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESTebt4s-RMqqs75556J728ez0zQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/14458370</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eK2KT6-sNqmC2gWduYW-CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESTebt4s-RMqqs75556J728ez0zQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O1yJT9L4IIei2QXTpJXrCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEY1PG5lc0bdjM52txqxY0Q108TnQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/14420474</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O1yJT9L4IIei2QXTpJXrCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEY1PG5lc0bdjM52txqxY0Q108TnQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jgyHT-SZJeaJ8AGl58CeCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGp4ykCycw_KKFcTrJ6pxpq8hlgLg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/14380218</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jgyHT-SZJeaJ8AGl58CeCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGp4ykCycw_KKFcTrJ6pxpq8hlgLg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IQ-GT86BJebW2gW-nb2ICQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNC1bIkW6GxWJuZNt6RBGAQYepUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/14353982</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IQ-GT86BJebW2gW-nb2ICQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNC1bIkW6GxWJuZNt6RBGAQYepUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=c2mET_r3FO--2AW98KziCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0_uEedAzuGeyJwU8p8eaFf6ZWBQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/14306171</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=c2mET_r3FO--2AW98KziCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0_uEedAzuGeyJwU8p8eaFf6ZWBQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hNF9T5--M4Lc9AT6zJ2hDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3b5e-VTYX6IpPLDc9p6N4z6nUXw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/14140877</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hNF9T5--M4Lc9AT6zJ2hDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3b5e-VTYX6IpPLDc9p6N4z6nUXw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Activist Post: Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yQ93T8GuGqX42gXv4LS1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHmEPysMa9ZS-2HzwrJyrSMVGgTsg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/13971381</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Activist</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yQ93T8GuGqX42gXv4LS1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHmEPysMa9ZS-2HzwrJyrSMVGgTsg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Activist Post: Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cOZ2T968LYGO2AXnx5S2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEinQph-3B1cXJAbSelccQ7h4Tl-Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/13967810</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Activist</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cOZ2T968LYGO2AXnx5S2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEinQph-3B1cXJAbSelccQ7h4Tl-Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Activist Post: Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rLt2T6CCCqeq2QXW6ty1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEYUOt1Q7d0vkeQX6pSReUIQtUZHg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/13965275</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Activist</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rLt2T6CCCqeq2QXW6ty1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEYUOt1Q7d0vkeQX6pSReUIQtUZHg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Activist Post: Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tRJ2T8CEEIWQ2AW2opm6DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEjHPUHFq1vHam0bfLeGPDCe6tXrQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/13946745</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Activist</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tRJ2T8CEEIWQ2AW2opm6DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEjHPUHFq1vHam0bfLeGPDCe6tXrQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Activist Post: Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=huh1T-q3AojA2gXzhp2UDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG5DchOI3QBPV2w80c_TSNqylCt0A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/13941299</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Activist</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=huh1T-q3AojA2gXzhp2UDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG5DchOI3QBPV2w80c_TSNqylCt0A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Activist Post: Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Vb51T5jxI8W_2QWX55CwDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEsxxraC3ZaSd8bHDDClP9RYoS5WQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/13930847</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Activist</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Vb51T5jxI8W_2QWX55CwDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEsxxraC3ZaSd8bHDDClP9RYoS5WQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Activist Post: Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eL11T527BOqW2AWo3_2QDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELJTsyIvvZX9ekoR6y8VeI-BLRbA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/13930709</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Activist</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eL11T527BOqW2AWo3_2QDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELJTsyIvvZX9ekoR6y8VeI-BLRbA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Activist Post: Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hJR1T4bpGujy2QWr8dWPDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3uentwXYICMv8-CVTo3SbYBAirQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/13927582</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Activist</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hJR1T4bpGujy2QWr8dWPDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3uentwXYICMv8-CVTo3SbYBAirQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Activist Post: Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=imt1T7LWDYGg8gTa2dSSBA&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFg-NHCsJxtixsEDzUif-0Z_b_H8Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/13924994</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Activist</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=imt1T7LWDYGg8gTa2dSSBA&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFg-NHCsJxtixsEDzUif-0Z_b_H8Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Activist Post: Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yz91T4nXGenu2gXYm-2sDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9izrozUEsTbDbEqvZEfmyUinl8A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/13923828</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Activist</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yz91T4nXGenu2gXYm-2sDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9izrozUEsTbDbEqvZEfmyUinl8A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Activist Post: Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lRV1T97eF4iG2gXJ36mwDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFHtkhaOm_yDbgpl41k3DwX7La8Vg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/13915864</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Activist</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lRV1T97eF4iG2gXJ36mwDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFHtkhaOm_yDbgpl41k3DwX7La8Vg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Activist Post: Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=b-t0T4O-LYjq2QXZzIy0DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlTZT0nwkKtBY2EI7GPmoKvZpSDQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/13912213</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Activist</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=b-t0T4O-LYjq2QXZzIy0DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlTZT0nwkKtBY2EI7GPmoKvZpSDQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Activist Post: Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UMF0T8nINciQ2AXBmODUDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNjapu8qxvy-ione65yrqISYVEgw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/13907492</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Activist</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UMF0T8nINciQ2AXBmODUDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNjapu8qxvy-ione65yrqISYVEgw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Activist Post: Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8JlzT9P1OsOq2gW2u7D-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoeFv11mCe3tCnEBUogEn_gMSqUw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/13874264</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Activist</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-most.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8JlzT9P1OsOq2gW2u7D-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoeFv11mCe3tCnEBUogEn_gMSqUw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/11445397</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="http://ppjg.wordpress.com/2011/12/01/5001/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-01:/commentary/11431582</id>
    <updated>2011-12-01T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ppjg.wordpress.com/2011/12/01/5001/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IV_GT4TcOaOc2AWZrL2sAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKTKKddj0G4HhXSsopDLUXETZEWg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15480201</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IV_GT4TcOaOc2AWZrL2sAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKTKKddj0G4HhXSsopDLUXETZEWg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=n7HDT4udO-r4sQLhj7T0CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFk5SdxvLfBuGkHatxPAomtePq_7A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15449591</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=n7HDT4udO-r4sQLhj7T0CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFk5SdxvLfBuGkHatxPAomtePq_7A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YQrBT6SODKj2sQK6hdHrCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEYX741TnyyMOePpdjEAZT2RaeFSg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15417574</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YQrBT6SODKj2sQK6hdHrCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEYX741TnyyMOePpdjEAZT2RaeFSg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=emu-T47ECcSq2QXu2rGjDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGyKrvHD351PJJQtQXPW5uXquwJ9w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15382754</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=emu-T47ECcSq2QXu2rGjDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGyKrvHD351PJJQtQXPW5uXquwJ9w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A_i7T6-QOcW42wXx4MSODw&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEX6-Qhh0DtlxrFNOfquMqW3bATEg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15348346</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A_i7T6-QOcW42wXx4MSODw&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEX6-Qhh0DtlxrFNOfquMqW3bATEg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sgi4T4jBCPTksQLRuoSLDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHp5RmrRQP-nFzR7U1fGzLgr3SkoQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15323155</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sgi4T4jBCPTksQLRuoSLDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHp5RmrRQP-nFzR7U1fGzLgr3SkoQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hta2T86hIaTU2AXxkqnICQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjeml-OVZxP15fPRaY5FLZdrYKjg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15311296</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hta2T86hIaTU2AXxkqnICQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjeml-OVZxP15fPRaY5FLZdrYKjg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=H4W2T5aRDbHhsQKMhM3jCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGS5Abphqet0HuZoVF2tHUnsrL3YQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15310788</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=H4W2T5aRDbHhsQKMhM3jCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGS5Abphqet0HuZoVF2tHUnsrL3YQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GC62T7S4EIPq2QX2oo3BCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvEvzjPPCg8mPbitJyC0F4TIs1ew" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15307737</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GC62T7S4EIPq2QX2oo3BCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvEvzjPPCg8mPbitJyC0F4TIs1ew&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SN21T4rGDuGC2AX6jbXZCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEngwaU3gtm9caY34wQraT7LZBXcA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15306220</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SN21T4rGDuGC2AX6jbXZCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFMQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEngwaU3gtm9caY34wQraT7LZBXcA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R4W1T7aNF-OQ2QXK07U1&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4JCPf2BT3pX5CIPpFq-52yHy2Aw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15302841</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R4W1T7aNF-OQ2QXK07U1&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4JCPf2BT3pX5CIPpFq-52yHy2Aw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bzO1T46dMIiQ8wSUyazwDw&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGWhcuxd1k8I_b5BehakRFdXKXPZw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15301855</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bzO1T46dMIiQ8wSUyazwDw&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGWhcuxd1k8I_b5BehakRFdXKXPZw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=s9y0T_-bDoyG8QSx75nZDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRnzvpmHebGPL5w5fianmlUocdIA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15297768</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=s9y0T_-bDoyG8QSx75nZDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRnzvpmHebGPL5w5fianmlUocdIA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xYq0T_CSLIiq8ASS8qneDw&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJvktka7tPvuyrHeqf8MqaoPX1vg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15293339</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xYq0T_CSLIiq8ASS8qneDw&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJvktka7tPvuyrHeqf8MqaoPX1vg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7zO0T7TXFY2c8QTZv53NDw&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHlUwrRNSC2Ea1eUZQc-eJAvy01_Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15285013</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7zO0T7TXFY2c8QTZv53NDw&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHlUwrRNSC2Ea1eUZQc-eJAvy01_Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XPmzT7zkBoK88ATN5bjZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFEQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGl8ZYWq2VnETWqABvvL2lNFjlqUg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15280182</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XPmzT7zkBoK88ATN5bjZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFEQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGl8ZYWq2VnETWqABvvL2lNFjlqUg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kt-zT6iDHcuDtgfl9NDyCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFEQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1tn174Kgq19rxz-ekRcduqTJ2eg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15277971</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kt-zT6iDHcuDtgfl9NDyCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFEQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1tn174Kgq19rxz-ekRcduqTJ2eg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7YqzT-_lE4ultweozZCjCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGeeGeAEDo83eq-b-Of-FtbZLvXJg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15272642</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7YqzT-_lE4ultweozZCjCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGeeGeAEDo83eq-b-Of-FtbZLvXJg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xzezT56QC8m8twfHzOWSCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFEQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGg3YEyeNacU6VLm_yHjHPRPiwcCQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15271312</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xzezT56QC8m8twfHzOWSCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CFEQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGg3YEyeNacU6VLm_yHjHPRPiwcCQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HOKyT8-GFMKztwfCldX4CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF8owd4lIukwIPTTt_MXd-_o4ho1Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15268716</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HOKyT8-GFMKztwfCldX4CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF8owd4lIukwIPTTt_MXd-_o4ho1Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SY6yT9iJMojHtgensOSHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHRYqyk_REsSZFSh8enjlQjodmL1Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15268329</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SY6yT9iJMojHtgensOSHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHRYqyk_REsSZFSh8enjlQjodmL1Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjmyT5j0OIWs9ATsm8zTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFM3zrNFzq0k3Vlyqn1QXSNy4X28A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15266956</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjmyT5j0OIWs9ATsm8zTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFM3zrNFzq0k3Vlyqn1QXSNy4X28A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UOexT4juN4fq9ASay-zuCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGECO9yMLadAzvvFl_AQ0xEGsxPBQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15262339</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UOexT4juN4fq9ASay-zuCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGECO9yMLadAzvvFl_AQ0xEGsxPBQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HZGxT4D_LoSG8QT3y9j_CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHo1anXvwp3ZKA1i68r2m52vXAIDQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15253306</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HZGxT4D_LoSG8QT3y9j_CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHo1anXvwp3ZKA1i68r2m52vXAIDQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=10uxT-PbMYXw2gWhr9DpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKHn2CaWqWzz1MOsBKGL1NSsrs8Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15247343</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=10uxT-PbMYXw2gWhr9DpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKHn2CaWqWzz1MOsBKGL1NSsrs8Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=azyxT_IE6qLaBffQvIEK&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVWubn0sMOc3giSUU_Ayk9RuJrOA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15245919</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=azyxT_IE6qLaBffQvIEK&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVWubn0sMOc3giSUU_Ayk9RuJrOA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AeiwT9fXFajm2gXSnbzpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECArBxgbAby3l3a3x5fxEEHJ05Ig" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15240238</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AeiwT9fXFajm2gXSnbzpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECArBxgbAby3l3a3x5fxEEHJ05Ig&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g5WwT8yIIoLe2AWs95npCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEPe_myFfnSRY8rVppvMkrrR8SG8Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15239001</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g5WwT8yIIoLe2AWs95npCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEPe_myFfnSRY8rVppvMkrrR8SG8Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_j6wT-zTDuew2wXYit2xAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZEJr-8Wh2GJsI2vUXqMOhOkKBLw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15237369</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_j6wT-zTDuew2wXYit2xAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZEJr-8Wh2GJsI2vUXqMOhOkKBLw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tOqvT_CmGcSZ2QXy_KjpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGkX4Oj9oUVWr0P-e7VaQhBUIA3Hw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15237278</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tOqvT_CmGcSZ2QXy_KjpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGkX4Oj9oUVWr0P-e7VaQhBUIA3Hw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tpavT8-XCanq2QWEw63pCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEftyzgvUkGpPKkdl8ILMUvK1poRg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15237136</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tpavT8-XCanq2QWEw63pCA&amp;amp;ved=0CFAQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEftyzgvUkGpPKkdl8ILMUvK1poRg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6UOvT5uaGsfY2QWsvaCVBg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEN6zlMHyJshezf-mUbTJiZbsUHAw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15232669</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6UOvT5uaGsfY2QWsvaCVBg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEN6zlMHyJshezf-mUbTJiZbsUHAw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ue2uT925Goec2AWhqZDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKjP8ANiWmjX6j6bKYBXIChzZeqQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15223255</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ue2uT925Goec2AWhqZDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKjP8ANiWmjX6j6bKYBXIChzZeqQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=76euT8CSFImw2QWe9tTpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0_BlE2V8s5RX4f2Wxdnmlmzum2w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15216798</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=76euT8CSFImw2QWe9tTpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0_BlE2V8s5RX4f2Wxdnmlmzum2w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m5muT86UOueY2wXL3p3pCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGMhg7t4sRvQTql6XmhvCdL0iAtvQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15215326</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m5muT86UOueY2wXL3p3pCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGMhg7t4sRvQTql6XmhvCdL0iAtvQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JUWuT-mXEYTo2QWfn63pCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmizvw1j04LnqTvGoUjGutiu1-kw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15209237</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JUWuT-mXEYTo2QWfn63pCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmizvw1j04LnqTvGoUjGutiu1-kw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bfStT5yWGOeG2gWO_LDpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGWaje5LZXMUo2Yy0nkpPIZWJk3Ug" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15207842</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bfStT5yWGOeG2gWO_LDpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGWaje5LZXMUo2Yy0nkpPIZWJk3Ug&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RZytT4vkDpKE8QT679D0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVNzs8eNls443eZncbK1NyS9CObQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/15205333</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RZytT4vkDpKE8QT679D0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVNzs8eNls443eZncbK1NyS9CObQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Bj12T43jK6jA2gX1uoSqDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE2hYx2IqeDeUKoe29YPZW1cOSpGg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13951944</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Bj12T43jK6jA2gX1uoSqDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE2hYx2IqeDeUKoe29YPZW1cOSpGg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tRJ2T8CEEIWQ2AW2opm6DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGGj_z--zohCk4yk-nM9wkRYVLD6w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13946743</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tRJ2T8CEEIWQ2AW2opm6DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGGj_z--zohCk4yk-nM9wkRYVLD6w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=huh1T-q3AojA2gXzhp2UDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJnifYrPVgdNyB-O_g6r5M-ZPw5w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13941297</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=huh1T-q3AojA2gXzhp2UDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJnifYrPVgdNyB-O_g6r5M-ZPw5w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Vb51T5jxI8W_2QWX55CwDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTkKMP1AV0KP2hg90YXKWeko3etw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13930845</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Vb51T5jxI8W_2QWX55CwDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTkKMP1AV0KP2hg90YXKWeko3etw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eL11T527BOqW2AWo3_2QDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHVpK4z_HC8sNBaSTMyeMGKYIaIEw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13930707</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eL11T527BOqW2AWo3_2QDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHVpK4z_HC8sNBaSTMyeMGKYIaIEw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hJR1T4bpGujy2QWr8dWPDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQ78MarpkQo3oC3mMXfUHfLZbctw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13927580</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hJR1T4bpGujy2QWr8dWPDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQ78MarpkQo3oC3mMXfUHfLZbctw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=imt1T7LWDYGg8gTa2dSSBA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNENA4yjyJroqbr1uI6oZTrEo7_reQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13924992</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=imt1T7LWDYGg8gTa2dSSBA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNENA4yjyJroqbr1uI6oZTrEo7_reQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yz91T4nXGenu2gXYm-2sDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQ0k3uZsYcszlzG-2HoIM2uBSCkA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13923826</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yz91T4nXGenu2gXYm-2sDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQ0k3uZsYcszlzG-2HoIM2uBSCkA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lRV1T97eF4iG2gXJ36mwDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKCQ9ThFKgfOJFOpZzYEUuQzxmEQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13915862</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lRV1T97eF4iG2gXJ36mwDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKCQ9ThFKgfOJFOpZzYEUuQzxmEQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=b-t0T4O-LYjq2QXZzIy0DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzxd1C9UN0VC2Ru8dIetjshZlAqQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13912211</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=b-t0T4O-LYjq2QXZzIy0DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzxd1C9UN0VC2Ru8dIetjshZlAqQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UMF0T8nINciQ2AXBmODUDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFP9T3FJPxBibPGRGWF0E9dhCH2iQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13907490</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UMF0T8nINciQ2AXBmODUDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFP9T3FJPxBibPGRGWF0E9dhCH2iQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IZd0T-6VEMX02QWD_uniDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJydlobQAhT0gOTusS0WWmrUQ1yw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13902122</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IZd0T-6VEMX02QWD_uniDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJydlobQAhT0gOTusS0WWmrUQ1yw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=22x0T_GeD8qW2AWA-qXwDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzyDHXVCiUwp70M1m_OTYzNgwfog" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13892041</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=22x0T_GeD8qW2AWA-qXwDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzyDHXVCiUwp70M1m_OTYzNgwfog&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U2J0T8_iKcaA2wXa9LTUDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBAtwlAH59KdInIVKxOwXbuZG_ww" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13890951</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U2J0T8_iKcaA2wXa9LTUDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBAtwlAH59KdInIVKxOwXbuZG_ww&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YkV0T-fxL6qA2gWU_pnFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZznC2vHfV_kECgd--DO4ZYMtORg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13888319</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YkV0T-fxL6qA2gWU_pnFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZznC2vHfV_kECgd--DO4ZYMtORg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sRh0T8rBBKTO2AWj_sTcDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGh-HGjgVm6jHs_KBNcDjF9aoURXA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13885311</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sRh0T8rBBKTO2AWj_sTcDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGh-HGjgVm6jHs_KBNcDjF9aoURXA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=S-5zT-WvHMWl2AWV9rT7Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFoSmUn4eGxt4LolEkpqbqlNsQe6Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13884053</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=S-5zT-WvHMWl2AWV9rT7Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFoSmUn4eGxt4LolEkpqbqlNsQe6Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=scRzT6LTAfH22AW-sJD9Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGtcqR8Ffjv5GPzAP_9hXKvprFAKA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13877896</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=scRzT6LTAfH22AW-sJD9Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGtcqR8Ffjv5GPzAP_9hXKvprFAKA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8JlzT9P1OsOq2gW2u7D-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEede4P0ukR_S-NbvfDd5TGOQUA9Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13874262</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8JlzT9P1OsOq2gW2u7D-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEede4P0ukR_S-NbvfDd5TGOQUA9Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v29zT-bfJoPY2QXUo9z7Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHP7sFrIMeIhn3kXQLUbS76FufiOQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13869680</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v29zT-bfJoPY2QXUo9z7Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHP7sFrIMeIhn3kXQLUbS76FufiOQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iUVzT5nAMKbs2QXntd3fDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFaan6Xw8ElbfHMThqDfBhRNaFBhA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13864005</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iUVzT5nAMKbs2QXntd3fDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFaan6Xw8ElbfHMThqDfBhRNaFBhA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZBtzT7eqMurO2AXTp5DMDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH140ggl6bAdCl9wlYiKgo2YEsurg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13853254</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZBtzT7eqMurO2AXTp5DMDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH140ggl6bAdCl9wlYiKgo2YEsurg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RhJzT-7yMaeL2AXMkbXHDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH-iCZYqe4bxOHu7NRPd9CdFQcJDA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13852215</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RhJzT-7yMaeL2AXMkbXHDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH-iCZYqe4bxOHu7NRPd9CdFQcJDA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9_FyT4LZIMqU2AWjwKHoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH2fdPh21D78hIZdOJiVAcKE1xTFw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13849546</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9_FyT4LZIMqU2AWjwKHoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH2fdPh21D78hIZdOJiVAcKE1xTFw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PMdyT7qLL4eq2QW4i-CEDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEEYfYl6QM7a-8zy0gdAuoyg4YZgA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13846654</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PMdyT7qLL4eq2QW4i-CEDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEEYfYl6QM7a-8zy0gdAuoyg4YZgA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0ZxyT_zEMcmL2AWdrLTcDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGHkXgFsWMThX8LRHdDI-ukRPH3GQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13845388</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0ZxyT_zEMcmL2AWdrLTcDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGHkXgFsWMThX8LRHdDI-ukRPH3GQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kXJyT_XcO4Ko2wWB5JH5Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhkRN126k4qwUdOWnqRLO4z28tWg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13841682</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kXJyT_XcO4Ko2wWB5JH5Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhkRN126k4qwUdOWnqRLO4z28tWg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bkhyT6mDCcOC2AXGxKz6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTMY8pAN83sF9Q-rUd7BYcWLR4wQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13837895</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bkhyT6mDCcOC2AXGxKz6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTMY8pAN83sF9Q-rUd7BYcWLR4wQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QR5yT-PGFISc2AWh6p3WDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHlEL8vOm3CzAeYCXuaVaaucj2jqQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13832882</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QR5yT-PGFISc2AWh6p3WDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHlEL8vOm3CzAeYCXuaVaaucj2jqQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=H_RxT5-ZOoXY2AXv16TFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtYSySQPXZg7TJ-NrShuPCMCw3Dg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13826771</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=H_RxT5-ZOoXY2AXv16TFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtYSySQPXZg7TJ-NrShuPCMCw3Dg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=48lxT9S2C9OnsAKUtbj9BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFSJn4Pzft2IhXTezG7qGFuax1mmA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13817165</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=48lxT9S2C9OnsAKUtbj9BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFSJn4Pzft2IhXTezG7qGFuax1mmA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=77pxT82DIcXs2QWx1tnxDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvmrFziiudV4MhMVrPd33fYZaXjQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13815501</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=77pxT82DIcXs2QWx1tnxDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvmrFziiudV4MhMVrPd33fYZaXjQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9aJxT9mfK4aysgKdrq39BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVyUqmO4VHRXEYgHFVjfPIs8oSlA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13813075</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9aJxT9mfK4aysgKdrq39BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVyUqmO4VHRXEYgHFVjfPIs8oSlA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=CHZxT42WO6apsQLO7oX9BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXtihswG1cJYa3rVKhno6LvTc_7w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13809924</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=CHZxT42WO6apsQLO7oX9BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXtihswG1cJYa3rVKhno6LvTc_7w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XktxT5e9M8ec2AXSiI3vDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXdXszA1tJdcVXsQ5SidPu6AsAHw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13808785</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XktxT5e9M8ec2AXSiI3vDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXdXszA1tJdcVXsQ5SidPu6AsAHw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KCFxT_GKLKmPsQL4uoDgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH64Z_E_KXMMTY36b1MBWyulq9Alg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13801418</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KCFxT_GKLKmPsQL4uoDgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH64Z_E_KXMMTY36b1MBWyulq9Alg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LPdwT_zRAubC2wXaj-HGDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJqi7M8B67s0WWxix_CP9UtCVXiA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13797465</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LPdwT_zRAubC2wXaj-HGDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJqi7M8B67s0WWxix_CP9UtCVXiA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=28xwT8uUKqjg2AXZp5XxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4DstYmf6dkMNvpsoXiRjtyy5QGQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13792472</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=28xwT8uUKqjg2AXZp5XxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4DstYmf6dkMNvpsoXiRjtyy5QGQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v6JwT5TTPOOg2gXc6qXxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHmnvUNfDlqDtBsAH5Zfg4MTU_dOA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13787334</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v6JwT5TTPOOg2gXc6qXxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHmnvUNfDlqDtBsAH5Zfg4MTU_dOA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=enhwT9SYBKjy2QWw7s2iCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhoqGp2cYDv3uvnoY2BzyZyzspsg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13776910</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=enhwT9SYBKjy2QWw7s2iCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhoqGp2cYDv3uvnoY2BzyZyzspsg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2nZwT6uxK-WxsgLas_zyBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHg0p6c7PUArRjiVvJn84FCBD02VA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13776673</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2nZwT6uxK-WxsgLas_zyBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHg0p6c7PUArRjiVvJn84FCBD02VA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eFBwT_PKBOOi2wXvyrHxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0-xz0v_A01FpFe89E9OkG_543SA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13773863</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eFBwT_PKBOOi2wXvyrHxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0-xz0v_A01FpFe89E9OkG_543SA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3iRwT7OiI_DHsQK9vaD4BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFaRGGSAXIoxdbEJardeKgWvZCM3w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13771358</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3iRwT7OiI_DHsQK9vaD4BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFaRGGSAXIoxdbEJardeKgWvZCM3w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=APpvT_WrKsLu2gWynZDnDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF8qBZBfpDzvDL8gKSFQWMWp1Ufuw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13770205</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=APpvT_WrKsLu2gWynZDnDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF8qBZBfpDzvDL8gKSFQWMWp1Ufuw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uc9vT8u7KoOM2gW0yL3xAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFqHv8xjY_NDetw57oqXpUWtnGg7g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13767142</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uc9vT8u7KoOM2gW0yL3xAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFqHv8xjY_NDetw57oqXpUWtnGg7g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=f6VvT-KfCerU2AWDyJTxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4DbQPJ-ly-d8M_nJgOmj4EkydFQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13763441</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=f6VvT-KfCerU2AWDyJTxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4DbQPJ-ly-d8M_nJgOmj4EkydFQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NntvT7S1JYSe2gX04Y3xAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEsOQFK8z7rdd51yoF2OZ9blOPFMw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13758492</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NntvT7S1JYSe2gX04Y3xAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEsOQFK8z7rdd51yoF2OZ9blOPFMw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IlFvT8b1D-jk2QWbpZnxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjeC64ushNVd5A-_PAGYOsDxhraA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13752760</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IlFvT8b1D-jk2QWbpZnxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjeC64ushNVd5A-_PAGYOsDxhraA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4iZvT7iDFuWysgKWqNCSBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGSnNx_iFg2ZUE8NUWI_67c3Z-p4g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13742465</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4iZvT7iDFuWysgKWqNCSBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGSnNx_iFg2ZUE8NUWI_67c3Z-p4g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eBlvT_P9OKW02wXPm6XyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFH5J38slI5C4O_x8g2nl8VLKGYsw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13740856</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eBlvT_P9OKW02wXPm6XyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFH5J38slI5C4O_x8g2nl8VLKGYsw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Iv5uT_mWKYr1sQLG6cXtBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFohHPcyspiAajUxqkgJj2hXhqohA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13738412</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Iv5uT_mWKYr1sQLG6cXtBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFohHPcyspiAajUxqkgJj2hXhqohA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PNNuT9DSLuKG2gWA7ZzxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGDmbIIfezD2jrz0Sm1XyCR5FLYAA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13735486</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PNNuT9DSLuKG2gWA7ZzxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGDmbIIfezD2jrz0Sm1XyCR5FLYAA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VKhuT97UOuGW2QX5gIXyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH886D4A_TdZRSKmp83EAb06ljm_w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13734305</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VKhuT97UOuGW2QX5gIXyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH886D4A_TdZRSKmp83EAb06ljm_w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=En5uT-vdBYiDsALZtdn3BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFeiTsj3eDVSTbrTy8ZDjtLZ0mdsg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13729293</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=En5uT-vdBYiDsALZtdn3BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFeiTsj3eDVSTbrTy8ZDjtLZ0mdsg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4lNuT-eSObSK2QXfybnxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJOvREaGqAkk6BzIOxMjL3jj1Nbw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13724993</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4lNuT-eSObSK2QXfybnxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJOvREaGqAkk6BzIOxMjL3jj1Nbw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vCluT8mqLeXg2gWVj_TwAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE5vQWJ-RExHiht7R67GFvktcSukw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13719572</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vCluT8mqLeXg2gWVj_TwAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE5vQWJ-RExHiht7R67GFvktcSukw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hf9tT4EQiZbZBeDq5fAB&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGA2CQsxgxZAoHd_0b6vbmLA-qK_g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13713799</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hf9tT4EQiZbZBeDq5fAB&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGA2CQsxgxZAoHd_0b6vbmLA-qK_g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7NhtT_myAui42wXNgp3yAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7pi_7ITW3t8xEArzDnW4_RT9kQw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13703534</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7NhtT_myAui42wXNgp3yAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7pi_7ITW3t8xEArzDnW4_RT9kQw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZdVtT8imMKrM2AWXgMHxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvypKdNJJ0X3wnhu1VH9wNgcSPbQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13703095</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZdVtT8imMKrM2AWXgMHxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvypKdNJJ0X3wnhu1VH9wNgcSPbQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=36ttT7isIqevsgLEpPz-BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFNIB4VFQ-gFoNXGafW4JgdRV5T7Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13700191</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=36ttT7isIqevsgLEpPz-BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFNIB4VFQ-gFoNXGafW4JgdRV5T7Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1YJtT8LCC-Ka2gWOmOnxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVpdmNxzVUrJ5Pamd24AhRN3B49g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13697790</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1YJtT8LCC-Ka2gWOmOnxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVpdmNxzVUrJ5Pamd24AhRN3B49g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FldtT93yO4jbsgLCxKmTBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHKm__cfVxO67a0ZfTX68dko-vrA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13696488</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FldtT93yO4jbsgLCxKmTBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHKm__cfVxO67a0ZfTX68dko-vrA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wCxtT8OCG-OLsQLZ4YCDBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHdl9apdQoGxIu2oDZkIVmXdv5PXA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13687916</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wCxtT8OCG-OLsQLZ4YCDBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHdl9apdQoGxIu2oDZkIVmXdv5PXA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kgJtT4ShPMStsgL4ta3pBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-XwLRfqh-BOIsQczVJMouCxJNOA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13683348</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kgJtT4ShPMStsgL4ta3pBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-XwLRfqh-BOIsQczVJMouCxJNOA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZdhsT5-wCYKL2AWjh9HlBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5id6uXJSjnTdyX3R_EgUVQ6-w-A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13678692</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZdhsT5-wCYKL2AWjh9HlBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5id6uXJSjnTdyX3R_EgUVQ6-w-A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P65sT9ZM6ObaBYi6jYwG&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHLuLPgKGgC2d3zdiJFpemZRQJcjg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13673816</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P65sT9ZM6ObaBYi6jYwG&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHLuLPgKGgC2d3zdiJFpemZRQJcjg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=D4RsT-zaLOag2gWznJyZBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGHhjKxxu0HocibNilZRwYelfqa5Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13662924</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=D4RsT-zaLOag2gWznJyZBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGHhjKxxu0HocibNilZRwYelfqa5Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nXpsT4D6COWg2QXetKWhCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJknGDPsxA50Er4ZtB_H1exNepdQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13661763</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nXpsT4D6COWg2QXetKWhCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJknGDPsxA50Er4ZtB_H1exNepdQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-F5sT_y1AYGY2AXrteiSBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8w5qyZVgtXXx9IgVZCIsNDM8jGg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13659309</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-F5sT_y1AYGY2AXrteiSBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8w5qyZVgtXXx9IgVZCIsNDM8jGg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uzBsT8W3LaWe2AWtt9mOBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJXli3V3wQXArbTin8I2UhKetndQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13656093</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uzBsT8W3LaWe2AWtt9mOBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJXli3V3wQXArbTin8I2UhKetndQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jwVsT4qNHIn02QWYr6T_BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF17m9Wp8KSVZwrRhef-L95Jq6KQA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13654679</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jwVsT4qNHIn02QWYr6T_BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF17m9Wp8KSVZwrRhef-L95Jq6KQA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=S9trT83VMeGQ2gWdi_WNBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJFVAMf1EeiKfV7MU9Ut6sbnZ6kg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13645854</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=S9trT83VMeGQ2gWdi_WNBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJFVAMf1EeiKfV7MU9Ut6sbnZ6kg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LrFrT5KcPImusgKw14HwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKqcXlC3jL3qhTZ3zRdDTeZJs3Lg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13641668</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LrFrT5KcPImusgKw14HwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKqcXlC3jL3qhTZ3zRdDTeZJs3Lg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-4ZrT4rQLqSFsAK2t-CABg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8DNTsLTVMJusA8WMGPTRgkfm8Zg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13636527</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-4ZrT4rQLqSFsAK2t-CABg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8DNTsLTVMJusA8WMGPTRgkfm8Zg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7lxrT-OwFu2OsAL4sfHmBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGt3MCXsXML0zu-5oy7oTFwGdZUlg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13631725</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7lxrT-OwFu2OsAL4sfHmBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGt3MCXsXML0zu-5oy7oTFwGdZUlg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kTJrT5LKH4aIsQKQvvz_BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhf6vB5uakGxZfzxnVf7A0DM-3sQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13620761</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kTJrT5LKH4aIsQKQvvz_BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhf6vB5uakGxZfzxnVf7A0DM-3sQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oCdrT8SiD-Sd2QXU7ZCZBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGiVlN9Vn7JBDFlx-SDE1amzRuexw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13619360</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oCdrT8SiD-Sd2QXU7ZCZBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGiVlN9Vn7JBDFlx-SDE1amzRuexw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ywxrT96KJIqysgKr5pHiBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1GM8l_ZysIPeOw08NlcjMX0-rGg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13617010</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ywxrT96KJIqysgKr5pHiBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1GM8l_ZysIPeOw08NlcjMX0-rGg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ct5qT6itKITO2AWMhtH3BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdiobvfa09lFcMprtLbqHHxX3x7A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13613580</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ct5qT6itKITO2AWMhtH3BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdiobvfa09lFcMprtLbqHHxX3x7A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MrRqT6LXEMOM2gXPyPyaBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFierpkXK8T-CwY-zdORzMRKk2dLA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13612143</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MrRqT6LXEMOM2gXPyPyaBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFierpkXK8T-CwY-zdORzMRKk2dLA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xIlqT5K1G4i3sQLU3KyKBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE2I77TBAx8_h0RUlq6aQc0Vkn-1w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13603414</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xIlqT5K1G4i3sQLU3KyKBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE2I77TBAx8_h0RUlq6aQc0Vkn-1w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uV9qT_rVJIGvsQKmwqH6BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGs70OCCGoLgDMCO-0rh6QARY1GCg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13599392</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uV9qT_rVJIGvsQKmwqH6BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGs70OCCGoLgDMCO-0rh6QARY1GCg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WTVqT8UZjKqwAsjLiYsJ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGeNrGgeEokMx7kZqLfV-Wx_D-G8A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13594109</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WTVqT8UZjKqwAsjLiYsJ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGeNrGgeEokMx7kZqLfV-Wx_D-G8A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WgtqT-iUOuGtsQLYmtWbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHccxA4yzqXYe82hgSuPtw-VUriIg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13588404</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WgtqT-iUOuGtsQLYmtWbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHccxA4yzqXYe82hgSuPtw-VUriIg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9OBpT87BB-Ww2wWJ_cXwCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGDbbstTg-Ry21sqrRrO6ztIDxnvg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13577653</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9OBpT87BB-Ww2wWJ_cXwCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGDbbstTg-Ry21sqrRrO6ztIDxnvg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UtVpT8nlOsKs2gWzsp3uCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE7wBAwZ67lgDueMTrw1YoTkGia8Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13576464</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UtVpT8nlOsKs2gWzsp3uCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE7wBAwZ67lgDueMTrw1YoTkGia8Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_bppT661IO-CsgLI06CeAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGWaOGg4U43f5b8oxdJtc1_oKvV5Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13573996</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_bppT661IO-CsgLI06CeAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGWaOGg4U43f5b8oxdJtc1_oKvV5Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tYxpT87bMIPgsQKj9KmHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEcWZPH4MOWIxX0q0e9CPsUavh_iA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13570731</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tYxpT87bMIPgsQKj9KmHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEcWZPH4MOWIxX0q0e9CPsUavh_iA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bWJpT4-2C-TosQKh7bCbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHah4zsbrIEF-3dMPXORWhhcZ_H-Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13569361</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bWJpT4-2C-TosQKh7bCbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHah4zsbrIEF-3dMPXORWhhcZ_H-Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MThpT5nUJ4HKsQLLhNChCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGg6Uwj2CeaC097wmNx6zhsGCL_xg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13560693</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MThpT5nUJ4HKsQLLhNChCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGg6Uwj2CeaC097wmNx6zhsGCL_xg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8w1pT9uHOqWesQLCibiPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2S7OAr5Vc2rl4OFejwLqWPhkWrg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13556505</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8w1pT9uHOqWesQLCibiPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2S7OAr5Vc2rl4OFejwLqWPhkWrg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zeNoT_6AEMOOsQLO2uSPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEyjXFrC8sxkWUSRgEkavI60e71og" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13551866</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zeNoT_6AEMOOsQLO2uSPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEyjXFrC8sxkWUSRgEkavI60e71og&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3LloT52WBKLosQKMk8yqCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH-5JWPZLR8bGD9nBGerRUsT1yN5w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13546003</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3LloT52WBKLosQKMk8yqCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH-5JWPZLR8bGD9nBGerRUsT1yN5w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bI9oT9G3O432sQKzptSFCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEuwXP-mG79inPOhODOk-7H0oyYUA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13535349</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bI9oT9G3O432sQKzptSFCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEuwXP-mG79inPOhODOk-7H0oyYUA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=94FoT4azCuWW2AXy_K37CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIWUC9IatJ1paujqg5v374fTQ3yQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13533833</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=94FoT4azCuWW2AXy_K37CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIWUC9IatJ1paujqg5v374fTQ3yQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6mhoT4SyOoXfsQKPsZSXCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJcke89yOUKF2Gy7_18CSThQKBOg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13531666</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6mhoT4SyOoXfsQKPsZSXCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJcke89yOUKF2Gy7_18CSThQKBOg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GTtoT5_rO4qO2wWT172LCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGMV7A42bpjsfBnndEWd88Sz-Turw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13528092</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GTtoT5_rO4qO2wWT172LCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGMV7A42bpjsfBnndEWd88Sz-Turw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xBoT_OXPIGvsgLfytmHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEC8KdhK2rJIfZyk-hdTTeGUbqiEw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13526950</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xBoT_OXPIGvsgLfytmHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEC8KdhK2rJIfZyk-hdTTeGUbqiEw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-ZnT7KjCsiJsQKnwoyuCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElj0p39IkSDBzOZHhq2mDDAx2gNg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13518014</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-ZnT7KjCsiJsQKnwoyuCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElj0p39IkSDBzOZHhq2mDDAx2gNg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gbxnT5DfCKT_sQL0xcGcCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-B6ULncBRZwjOjxrcnInvxf3t4Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13513746</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gbxnT5DfCKT_sQL0xcGcCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-B6ULncBRZwjOjxrcnInvxf3t4Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UpJnT9HFIIyqsALIy4mLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtszVHfHjz86Z_E7N4qTXi0WeWvA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13509282</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UpJnT9HFIIyqsALIy4mLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtszVHfHjz86Z_E7N4qTXi0WeWvA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NGhnT_iOEIn2sQKk9u22Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9FErlToPcVwHwsM2GOtdZYpzCtQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13503694</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NGhnT_iOEIn2sQKk9u22Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9FErlToPcVwHwsM2GOtdZYpzCtQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4j1nT9XoAse2sQKz_Ki3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGW4QaZu2l3zTndIJK1hkOB7N1ZTg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13493400</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4j1nT9XoAse2sQKz_Ki3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGW4QaZu2l3zTndIJK1hkOB7N1ZTg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0jVnT-z9MKnW2gXwlLmvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1mL1yJgACxoSH5QcFPxLePgrdlA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13492344</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0jVnT-z9MKnW2gXwlLmvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1mL1yJgACxoSH5QcFPxLePgrdlA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zhdnT-TEMMLI2gWj4O3SCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFC2SG54i9BBTCxpM7RVcpPig_3g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13489639</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zhdnT-TEMMLI2gWj4O3SCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFC2SG54i9BBTCxpM7RVcpPig_3g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qOlmT_6sGK_isQL27Ji3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHGKNKaE4DhZPRg6nb9JlBJ_TN5Gw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13486558</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qOlmT_6sGK_isQL27Ji3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHGKNKaE4DhZPRg6nb9JlBJ_TN5Gw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VL9mT-uKGMG4sQLxt4i3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGiSz1A2pWwDLJYlQUX8BnonFR2QA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13485489</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VL9mT-uKGMG4sQLxt4i3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGiSz1A2pWwDLJYlQUX8BnonFR2QA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=G5VmT4vWKdLMsQK4wpG3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZ0v32A1oNqvT6FSfkwbzFLk6EzA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13482145</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=G5VmT4vWKdLMsQK4wpG3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZ0v32A1oNqvT6FSfkwbzFLk6EzA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=92pmT46JF-2CsAL3y4S3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF_twJInRtGgxjoEto44BgYUlA-_Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13478527</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=92pmT46JF-2CsAL3y4S3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF_twJInRtGgxjoEto44BgYUlA-_Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0UBmT_WOGa_5sQKp0ui2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0EWlVzd8w7Al7EDLgILtsEvBHsQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13473424</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0UBmT_WOGa_5sQKp0ui2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0EWlVzd8w7Al7EDLgILtsEvBHsQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oBZmT7qSGsqe2gXfh9GxCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGujvgKjdSTVq3zoIHSz2p7p2VNMg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13467546</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oBZmT7qSGsqe2gXfh9GxCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGujvgKjdSTVq3zoIHSz2p7p2VNMg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=a-xlT5iJGsS-2AWD3KzYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFaw0RRjVz8_k7Wxn8fRhSnronZuA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13456619</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=a-xlT5iJGsS-2AWD3KzYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFaw0RRjVz8_k7Wxn8fRhSnronZuA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xdplT5S-I6nMsQK40L2zDw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGgXjJ3PvghKRRoNBqPaJgiuN1zhw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13454356</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xdplT5S-I6nMsQK40L2zDw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGgXjJ3PvghKRRoNBqPaJgiuN1zhw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ccZlT8_5Lqjm2gXD8fHeCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFn5Iw7vtQ6tQxjDe2SBZNJtayhNQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13452105</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ccZlT8_5Lqjm2gXD8fHeCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFn5Iw7vtQ6tQxjDe2SBZNJtayhNQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QphlT6GFOMGrsQK_zpC3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFNcpP8K97RDtgKXDYLKzON7IOWrg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13448682</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QphlT6GFOMGrsQK_zpC3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFNcpP8K97RDtgKXDYLKzON7IOWrg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6G1lT--iCaTjsQK0jb23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrGPjPrbKndOg86kDAGD34LQ_W_A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13447535</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6G1lT--iCaTjsQK0jb23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrGPjPrbKndOg86kDAGD34LQ_W_A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=80NlT8iCBoqFsAK0-b23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGOYv-trcHaBGgTl2L0nfbfBP6Ohg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13442421</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=80NlT8iCBoqFsAK0-b23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGOYv-trcHaBGgTl2L0nfbfBP6Ohg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nRllT-efBqf5sQL9g-23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTXLbtovRe-UjYUjcbgkeP2qu9yQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13438350</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nRllT-efBqf5sQL9g-23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTXLbtovRe-UjYUjcbgkeP2qu9yQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=f-9kT6-GBeGQsAKTofG2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5gQvsqvWCWb4APPEHrZYmTU8ETQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13433167</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=f-9kT6-GBeGQsAKTofG2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5gQvsqvWCWb4APPEHrZYmTU8ETQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RMVkT4SqI42qsAKZrqC2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHdYCz0SbdXCTZvym69Mb79aDNV9g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13427113</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RMVkT4SqI42qsAKZrqC2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHdYCz0SbdXCTZvym69Mb79aDNV9g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LJtkT7qCGMeKsQLIle22Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfVGu26HxXX0PMYt5BS3T1N0LVwA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13416206</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LJtkT7qCGMeKsQLIle22Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfVGu26HxXX0PMYt5BS3T1N0LVwA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_oxkT6rjGKKGsgK42dW2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4WWeVu2bDYls3J8Vj69lpImSr8g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13414634</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_oxkT6rjGKKGsgK42dW2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4WWeVu2bDYls3J8Vj69lpImSr8g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GnVkT5X8LrCDsAL7-qy2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHulVe2fV-BI4wE6jUGwo40l74U9g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13412432</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GnVkT5X8LrCDsAL7-qy2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHulVe2fV-BI4wE6jUGwo40l74U9g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XUdkT5iQOob22gWq1Y3gCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEh5TYPM3OaTgLol74EtP-2A_UoMQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13408829</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XUdkT5iQOob22gWq1Y3gCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEh5TYPM3OaTgLol74EtP-2A_UoMQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QRxkT5O9J6mPsQLum423Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4WU0EHiLGHWs_heR6ZyF_mADUaQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13407662</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QRxkT5O9J6mPsQLum423Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4WU0EHiLGHWs_heR6ZyF_mADUaQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W_JjT7meLeeW2AXtmcnbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGeBv9WmHyclQqZ7V_MT9te3enALw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13403926</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W_JjT7meLeeW2AXtmcnbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGeBv9WmHyclQqZ7V_MT9te3enALw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LchjT-r3AYHlsQL9uZGcCw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcc8DPostBCMjkszPbZR6rsqpc4Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13403748</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LchjT-r3AYHlsQL9uZGcCw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcc8DPostBCMjkszPbZR6rsqpc4Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AJ5jT6qtI4eFsALbg_SbCw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfy0sD0GjjEeXlgABYTOII16m21w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13403560</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AJ5jT6qtI4eFsALbg_SbCw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfy0sD0GjjEeXlgABYTOII16m21w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KUpjT--JBeKS2QXP1-XrCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjKtjim4Z2ODNZ1kJPqkeGoIomxQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13398893</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KUpjT--JBeKS2QXP1-XrCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjKtjim4Z2ODNZ1kJPqkeGoIomxQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pSFjT7GHDKbO2AWrkp3WCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKCfJujYuo7dgI_cbI1VtKKA2DmA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13398055</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pSFjT7GHDKbO2AWrkp3WCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKCfJujYuo7dgI_cbI1VtKKA2DmA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=avViT5LtJKeq2QX85tXPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9HndPPj-g82_Ffnm9KjBEixi9RQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13395347</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=avViT5LtJKeq2QX85tXPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9HndPPj-g82_Ffnm9KjBEixi9RQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U8tiT779Ie-psALizYGcCw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSA8cYTQQ5YFPVfsPLiJpqeRN5iA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13389671</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U8tiT779Ie-psALizYGcCw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSA8cYTQQ5YFPVfsPLiJpqeRN5iA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TKFiT-GILOrg2gXKxZTMCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHVoxE1ocpec_3mmDqo7oWRk6Y8lQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13381439</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TKFiT-GILOrg2gXKxZTMCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHVoxE1ocpec_3mmDqo7oWRk6Y8lQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5XZiT_jZK4aEsAL_srikDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoX3XHmhYwWQ50B9yHmdOQo6MhhQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13377888</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5XZiT_jZK4aEsAL_srikDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoX3XHmhYwWQ50B9yHmdOQo6MhhQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=30xiT6imPITW2gWS1azcCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjQPpjVQxWIGYCiai2zImpR6p9uw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13373951</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=30xiT6imPITW2gWS1azcCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjQPpjVQxWIGYCiai2zImpR6p9uw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fyJiT4GcMsK_2QXwvei2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4-6yTXVxFc9fPgFwRrT-nZWgl8Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13364037</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fyJiT4GcMsK_2QXwvei2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4-6yTXVxFc9fPgFwRrT-nZWgl8Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cx5iT5b0GerC2wWj_NXvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_V4Oo_xFnUs-m0L5j5MlbYotapg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13362575</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cx5iT5b0GerC2wWj_NXvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_V4Oo_xFnUs-m0L5j5MlbYotapg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uQBiT-36BqLlsQLbxrSkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE5csEKeBqCfdrNHWtKFRPnzrGszw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13361259</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uQBiT-36BqLlsQLbxrSkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE5csEKeBqCfdrNHWtKFRPnzrGszw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zs9hT4aWGOSJsgKJ8KWkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELlcjfCBx_8QwtpRQ4Bl23ECAAkw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13358722</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zs9hT4aWGOSJsgKJ8KWkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELlcjfCBx_8QwtpRQ4Bl23ECAAkw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-aNhT9j_HcX7sQK3hq2JAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBlavrOkNXI3V60oVbC7oNriyF4g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13355830</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-aNhT9j_HcX7sQK3hq2JAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBlavrOkNXI3V60oVbC7oNriyF4g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nHlhT4CXOOT42gXUjbWPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiVVWP5uehqli8gRtWwEFEpsilmA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13350878</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nHlhT4CXOOT42gXUjbWPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiVVWP5uehqli8gRtWwEFEpsilmA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gE9hT8DOO8_JsQK2-djyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0HktbWagMB2yN0Wcx4VbEiYTbiw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13340469</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gE9hT8DOO8_JsQK2-djyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0HktbWagMB2yN0Wcx4VbEiYTbiw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HiVhT_SSAcji2QX4x72CCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHY2OalqOERE4ZVgswwN7SMl0AgCg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13336479</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HiVhT_SSAcji2QX4x72CCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHY2OalqOERE4ZVgswwN7SMl0AgCg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9PpgT5meBY2H2AWE-OCaCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFxCN55-HGI-2c7C-LAnp8s0xYhxg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13332425</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9PpgT5meBY2H2AWE-OCaCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFxCN55-HGI-2c7C-LAnp8s0xYhxg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P9FgT7wPjIOwAuvv3JYI&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFiRKwZLUeLRLMWRlqNPxse9-54eA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13326275</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P9FgT7wPjIOwAuvv3JYI&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFiRKwZLUeLRLMWRlqNPxse9-54eA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KK5gT6KyFtTKsQL4oJSWCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-kMPyEawFZUrW44cszfyF3dxYFA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13318828</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KK5gT6KyFtTKsQL4oJSWCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-kMPyEawFZUrW44cszfyF3dxYFA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FKdgT6qzI8jL2QXH_cCdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGPRuFO_YJK_aCbB-jtZmvX2LS8EQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13318346</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FKdgT6qzI8jL2QXH_cCdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGPRuFO_YJK_aCbB-jtZmvX2LS8EQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iYBgT-T_CYXm2AWXvuSpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9JkUFvOtIq5ZKLX40LRZHH98YRA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13315817</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iYBgT-T_CYXm2AWXvuSpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9JkUFvOtIq5ZKLX40LRZHH98YRA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0VJgT5qeD4Pu2gXm-a2BCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiBTG6jbsb9SI0em9f9x2mx4hmdw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13312932</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0VJgT5qeD4Pu2gXm-a2BCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiBTG6jbsb9SI0em9f9x2mx4hmdw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EyhgT7v8FYrg2AX8p5mVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_3NzcAT4YPX1wu6qZu0o0wBvCzw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13310581</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EyhgT7v8FYrg2AX8p5mVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_3NzcAT4YPX1wu6qZu0o0wBvCzw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9v1fT4fXFcWGsgLYtICiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFxkn1iQTnS9ozSKlqi3FDXWF7iAQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13300529</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9v1fT4fXFcWGsgLYtICiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFxkn1iQTnS9ozSKlqi3FDXWF7iAQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lNNfT43UFc-JsAK2nYWTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHt3kSwq-HftV5DBQt6Lk41kG3lUA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13296297</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lNNfT43UFc-JsAK2nYWTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHt3kSwq-HftV5DBQt6Lk41kG3lUA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jqlfT63bNcTC2wWFr9SSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHA39OnhO0uP76wxTICmTzo65RT4Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13291372</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jqlfT63bNcTC2wWFr9SSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHA39OnhO0uP76wxTICmTzo65RT4Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oH9fT-m0OMSvsgKq2bykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESygEgmsp-pCdfeaJIp_3o2envsA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13284310</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oH9fT-m0OMSvsgKq2bykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESygEgmsp-pCdfeaJIp_3o2envsA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O1ZfT5BcwqDaBZaqgYQI&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8ESI4gTJ-YH3itx6Ph9NMH2LU_w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13276610</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O1ZfT5BcwqDaBZaqgYQI&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8ESI4gTJ-YH3itx6Ph9NMH2LU_w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KkpfT-nWDoPq2QWDs4CnCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHJ8BAk95fsGO-KFUiHQoDO_yrp2g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13275924</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KkpfT-nWDoPq2QWDs4CnCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHJ8BAk95fsGO-KFUiHQoDO_yrp2g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MC5fT-ziGMbS2QX8xeWJCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnNVdSmWIMcYjyJGNGt3yyEp8_0Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13273612</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MC5fT-ziGMbS2QX8xeWJCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnNVdSmWIMcYjyJGNGt3yyEp8_0Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LAFfT_OxM8fe2AXqmcGpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvzw_C6Ce3xOR0mtOhoY_WqsHCVw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13270458</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LAFfT_OxM8fe2AXqmcGpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvzw_C6Ce3xOR0mtOhoY_WqsHCVw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9ZeT8m5CuOy2wWxg9yzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYOdGk3vRWF-to88oeyc9AWfm45w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13269224</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9ZeT8m5CuOy2wWxg9yzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYOdGk3vRWF-to88oeyc9AWfm45w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bKxeT_PUBenC2wXGh-DzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEUZ0y1q4Mn-Z44YbO-1PfYFEUr3g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13259240</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bKxeT_PUBenC2wXGh-DzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEUZ0y1q4Mn-Z44YbO-1PfYFEUr3g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SoJeT8HbOIeFsALi6cTNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFIGR9PJNVjGu0K8343m-yahCNtXA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13254756</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SoJeT8HbOIeFsALi6cTNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFIGR9PJNVjGu0K8343m-yahCNtXA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_FdeT7m_MOHi2gW5-N2HDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCcsgAhZCobEk0IWnGZuHJvHSDGw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13249857</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_FdeT7m_MOHi2gW5-N2HDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCcsgAhZCobEk0IWnGZuHJvHSDGw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DS5eT4LLKJTisQL-i63EDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnCkk3rTiXCbj7WityHAp1H7P3BA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13244660</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DS5eT4LLKJTisQL-i63EDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnCkk3rTiXCbj7WityHAp1H7P3BA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FgReT5jECojO2wWO_KHaDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0WhuCY0sb2U_8Fcoy8b-M9CSFBQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13235038</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FgReT5jECojO2wWO_KHaDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0WhuCY0sb2U_8Fcoy8b-M9CSFBQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jvtdT62XLOeW2AXDn6zCAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGs4lAGBSHS4Htad4Y2S5xyCE6nDg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13234366</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jvtdT62XLOeW2AXDn6zCAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGs4lAGBSHS4Htad4Y2S5xyCE6nDg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ut1dT-vgJ-Oo2wWayZ37Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEoXk4T09pT5ExcBQrwUxm9_pAy0Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13232138</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ut1dT-vgJ-Oo2wWayZ37Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEoXk4T09pT5ExcBQrwUxm9_pAy0Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ta9dT4KvDaW02wWIrI2BDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHEXnZX4u6X3FUN_0TS7gxIw7tT-Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13228961</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ta9dT4KvDaW02wWIrI2BDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHEXnZX4u6X3FUN_0TS7gxIw7tT-Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GoVdT7K3A8Wa2AXvvdT8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGOzk8MBwSdxlaZSo96tucbAtshvg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13227690</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GoVdT7K3A8Wa2AXvvdT8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGOzk8MBwSdxlaZSo96tucbAtshvg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01pdT_q0KIqDsAKwxYXTDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFtfKtY6VnuQUaowRtTOhh-r5R3Tg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13219904</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01pdT_q0KIqDsAKwxYXTDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFtfKtY6VnuQUaowRtTOhh-r5R3Tg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kKdcT5CJKMjL2QXJwMGOBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXPGVIh2ZYQtqVFTJLm9F_0timAw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13193528</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kKdcT5CJKMjL2QXJwMGOBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXPGVIh2ZYQtqVFTJLm9F_0timAw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FcNbT561MY7hsQKrqrS_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzDgfce3Sm88g6U3Lgcx74Tp4ZLA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13167794</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FcNbT561MY7hsQKrqrS_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzDgfce3Sm88g6U3Lgcx74Tp4ZLA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=65hbT5e-OOWe2wXfwoCDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9pAC6ffWH5JTG9SDhA21stFOL9A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13162298</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=65hbT5e-OOWe2wXfwoCDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9pAC6ffWH5JTG9SDhA21stFOL9A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6W5bT6CRGuGQ2gXE9cT6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9_Lgdd36aYA3xu1EGuwAvomiPIg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13152501</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6W5bT6CRGuGQ2gXE9cT6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9_Lgdd36aYA3xu1EGuwAvomiPIg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WxbT8XWE4P02QXh2fDeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7UQfohNO10JyivTo1kMjsr8ttIw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13152245</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WxbT8XWE4P02QXh2fDeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7UQfohNO10JyivTo1kMjsr8ttIw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DkVbT9yXI6rM2AXSwomKAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFJJ4gz-yNV09CD4a6EZy0BPsBFQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13149181</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DkVbT9yXI6rM2AXSwomKAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFJJ4gz-yNV09CD4a6EZy0BPsBFQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZxtbT4KSGMqGsgLkjMXJDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG60-MCGXXHTvxcghKTNEnFJcqnIw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13146776</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZxtbT4KSGMqGsgLkjMXJDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG60-MCGXXHTvxcghKTNEnFJcqnIw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KPBaT5-2N4SNsALZmOWxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElY_CUne8GVVbqpR6RHGS-dedPkg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13145388</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KPBaT5-2N4SNsALZmOWxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElY_CUne8GVVbqpR6RHGS-dedPkg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-MVaT5qaHtSk2gWwqeHvDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFnSBndMNXe4MsjWMdM2hpNLs7Y4A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13136187</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-MVaT5qaHtSk2gWwqeHvDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFnSBndMNXe4MsjWMdM2hpNLs7Y4A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yptaT5ueAaad2QXgy8XwDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGW3HhTCmvd9TuYVXZZhrxclANa8g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13132519</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yptaT5ueAaad2QXgy8XwDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGW3HhTCmvd9TuYVXZZhrxclANa8g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PnJaT4f2I-Wg2AXSuYnjDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-zyFSJM1PusR_Xuoes28A4BX09Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13127741</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PnJaT4f2I-Wg2AXSuYnjDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-zyFSJM1PusR_Xuoes28A4BX09Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XkdaT833IJT1sQKokaTJDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcqxd14Yvr2AsqPTGse-8SG8xj3w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13121545</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XkdaT833IJT1sQKokaTJDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcqxd14Yvr2AsqPTGse-8SG8xj3w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mx1aT_G5LMK1sQLE66zkDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHw8Sn5hKfi0WCzYGlFxiYYdxoRWA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13111296</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mx1aT_G5LMK1sQLE66zkDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHw8Sn5hKfi0WCzYGlFxiYYdxoRWA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xRBaT9CvM6LlsQLWwYHaDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERDbvUD6bSlFVJJFA0Z1ruxvR7LA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13110011</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xRBaT9CvM6LlsQLWwYHaDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERDbvUD6bSlFVJJFA0Z1ruxvR7LA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UvNZT7HCBtTKsQKNjfnEDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHRN-3yoKRCl2bNVj__blYv_4Nurw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13107646</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UvNZT7HCBtTKsQKNjfnEDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHRN-3yoKRCl2bNVj__blYv_4Nurw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=w8lZT4KDD7OmsALwhYm5DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-i2HDWfu2bEBT3DwRCyMQoqShSQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13104673</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=w8lZT4KDD7OmsALwhYm5DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-i2HDWfu2bEBT3DwRCyMQoqShSQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r55ZT9WmMYuosAL5-tjZDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZv0QZmdvMl4cU3wL-BN5QnU1vBQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13103327</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r55ZT9WmMYuosAL5-tjZDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZv0QZmdvMl4cU3wL-BN5QnU1vBQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WnRZT9yzBofpsQLK-I3ADQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGq5ssBPwYv24P8zyFxdyXRmQYWmQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13098094</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WnRZT9yzBofpsQLK-I3ADQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGq5ssBPwYv24P8zyFxdyXRmQYWmQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LEpZT4XVNI32sQK179WuDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQeELp3hAQ9KQjIDoaPf41wKlq4A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13094027</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LEpZT4XVNI32sQK179WuDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQeELp3hAQ9KQjIDoaPf41wKlq4A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DSBZT-maNYb3sQKx7Z3XDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFaIvV-5USW0bx9MHEuDErx-2Bc_g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13088961</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DSBZT-maNYb3sQKx7Z3XDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFaIvV-5USW0bx9MHEuDErx-2Bc_g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8vVYT92JLIeQsAKOxKnKDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGg4CCu3zYB1d25LP99JooPcBu64A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13083107</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8vVYT92JLIeQsAKOxKnKDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGg4CCu3zYB1d25LP99JooPcBu64A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Y85YT-yADs3jsQKO2IjCDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGTKnzvIPMwYJAjjOIQ_dcckNJMjg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13072568</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Y85YT-yADs3jsQKO2IjCDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGTKnzvIPMwYJAjjOIQ_dcckNJMjg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vblYT5K-Maz2sQKcwLmPBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHro4aCgf_suZs-AxgCA7bfRLDBeA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13070763</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vblYT5K-Maz2sQKcwLmPBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHro4aCgf_suZs-AxgCA7bfRLDBeA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SKJYT-TfEceEsgKlruXbDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8MdWpNYhSrVJ7TXIm2UPWBzpMJA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13068501</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SKJYT-TfEceEsgKlruXbDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8MdWpNYhSrVJ7TXIm2UPWBzpMJA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1HdYT6S6KMb5sQL0k5GxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEoVPD4gfwdgPvPamuhynNBdxe7kA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13065248</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1HdYT6S6KMb5sQL0k5GxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEoVPD4gfwdgPvPamuhynNBdxe7kA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GE1YT9blOeansAL7rPmtDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHwrF59Xg8tfjBFkOA35gknrXJuvA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13063849</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GE1YT9blOeansAL7rPmtDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHwrF59Xg8tfjBFkOA35gknrXJuvA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4iJYT672D-SxsALTgr20DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElWGE7jiWc9zSF13-OvVAoymLOIA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13058529</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4iJYT672D-SxsALTgr20DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElWGE7jiWc9zSF13-OvVAoymLOIA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sPhXT6i7M6iPsQKAuajiDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5-bE1Y2Du-Wg9qVJXSMDiYNx8mg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13054736</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sPhXT6i7M6iPsQKAuajiDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5-bE1Y2Du-Wg9qVJXSMDiYNx8mg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A89XT5LuDYnu2gWFnLHPDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGTVcXya2N3DvaN-PTQT3rRMPdt1Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13049887</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A89XT5LuDYnu2gWFnLHPDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGTVcXya2N3DvaN-PTQT3rRMPdt1Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RaRXT62fHaPisQKxmNW1DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxCt0IfNd9yAxGv9u1-qCJ1Kr5LA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13043729</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RaRXT62fHaPisQKxmNW1DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxCt0IfNd9yAxGv9u1-qCJ1Kr5LA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MHtXT5zeLunO2gXI-Nn-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNSHCbEG8Wx3nWw98asEMs2rxgFQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13032893</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MHtXT5zeLunO2gXI-Nn-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNSHCbEG8Wx3nWw98asEMs2rxgFQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=emRXT4uRKsKW2QW1u_jQDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF7Ti9-8n4-trng-rDTIAcPmPRcRA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13030771</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=emRXT4uRKsKW2QW1u_jQDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF7Ti9-8n4-trng-rDTIAcPmPRcRA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FVBXT4nuG4rq2wWQhJj1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGR0tBtP8LoDt-O881FgKUYlRZJdg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13028911</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FVBXT4nuG4rq2wWQhJj1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGR0tBtP8LoDt-O881FgKUYlRZJdg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ESdXT4PEOOn9sQKPuuHNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVPTk5_uKMnWRDfb-A_5zCfYtxAA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13025396</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ESdXT4PEOOn9sQKPuuHNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVPTk5_uKMnWRDfb-A_5zCfYtxAA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g_tWT5aPAsiF2AW3qbD5Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCnTcE4rmoUquUh_eRH5qSuXeQhw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13024015</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g_tWT5aPAsiF2AW3qbD5Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCnTcE4rmoUquUh_eRH5qSuXeQhw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UdFWT9LMIunO2gWp1dDlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGkH8XsscE2DVsoUQqRtqhH5VgjWQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13019293</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UdFWT9LMIunO2gWp1dDlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGkH8XsscE2DVsoUQqRtqhH5VgjWQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NKdWT92_MpGrsALcxaDJCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZA69l01g7MyuxGD-egW8b-yd2hg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13015582</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NKdWT92_MpGrsALcxaDJCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZA69l01g7MyuxGD-egW8b-yd2hg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9nxWT47rNoGvsQLKhvjdCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE93ira70rOPheDWkXklLMtrEwsyA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13010431</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9nxWT47rNoGvsQLKhvjdCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE93ira70rOPheDWkXklLMtrEwsyA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z1JWT-HGK8XMsQLv0pjSCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJ5RK8MzQbGN3DIIngH9FlQWaLKA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/13004012</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z1JWT-HGK8XMsQLv0pjSCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJ5RK8MzQbGN3DIIngH9FlQWaLKA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mylWT47hFoyqsAK409nPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH96divnQaE8MuVwDE9Ghx2P0gCcw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12993253</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mylWT47hFoyqsAK409nPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH96divnQaE8MuVwDE9Ghx2P0gCcw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yhFWT7TKOKetsQKF7bnpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4xXx8aS9G5wFLZEkgVYvP4xN8EQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12990480</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yhFWT7TKOKetsQKF7bnpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4xXx8aS9G5wFLZEkgVYvP4xN8EQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=j_5VT_eOGsavsAK886jpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH6heBQ8yLZeXIQvvJIinpgZTHELg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12988609</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=j_5VT_eOGsavsAK886jpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH6heBQ8yLZeXIQvvJIinpgZTHELg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g9RVT-DaELL_sQLC-ZXjCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzrql7Q2YEDsh_bO1DduFzxRsKRw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12985210</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g9RVT-DaELL_sQLC-ZXjCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzrql7Q2YEDsh_bO1DduFzxRsKRw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DqpVT5nPIuuGsgLr2NDVCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFg2NY3CRgjNWemQwJ7vXMAm4x2qA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12983946</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DqpVT5nPIuuGsgLr2NDVCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFg2NY3CRgjNWemQwJ7vXMAm4x2qA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2H9VT4TmOqaJsAKtxfTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGSBggvPs5p5RG_SnKdDkmuhMFUNg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12980404</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2H9VT4TmOqaJsAKtxfTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGSBggvPs5p5RG_SnKdDkmuhMFUNg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVVVT-nfFPKpsALFt4jwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGeobr-JcbE2lrnv9mCKnoKAbAeRQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12976881</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVVVT-nfFPKpsALFt4jwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGeobr-JcbE2lrnv9mCKnoKAbAeRQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iStVT_iNCeKHsgLygPXvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGn9AYce2AtC-zEiVGe49anbKhL_A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12971978</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iStVT_iNCeKHsgLygPXvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGn9AYce2AtC-zEiVGe49anbKhL_A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WQFVT-udJaT_sQKk8tyKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHFVfft9cz6rVh8PXJn6YaZ6vjwsQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12965587</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WQFVT-udJaT_sQKk8tyKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHFVfft9cz6rVh8PXJn6YaZ6vjwsQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iNhUT9ypEuahsgKG4_XvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEbrkp_SEDnPm1le1lHvY_L7akIBA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12954645</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iNhUT9ypEuahsgKG4_XvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEbrkp_SEDnPm1le1lHvY_L7akIBA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ycBUT4KODoKAsgKH94zwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHGDhuhUNDT6dfQ-JU32mr-qms-Jg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12951805</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ycBUT4KODoKAsgKH94zwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHGDhuhUNDT6dfQ-JU32mr-qms-Jg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C61UT9CNIPGDsgKwpqHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhujKCVZvznQsDw1dQvLT_OHXzXg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12949742</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C61UT9CNIPGDsgKwpqHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhujKCVZvznQsDw1dQvLT_OHXzXg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OoRUT_yOMOvksQKa4tTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG1fSfS2oXvqXVeC9pYBEAeQfyRug" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12946587</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OoRUT_yOMOvksQKa4tTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG1fSfS2oXvqXVeC9pYBEAeQfyRug&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nFhUT47wNKaesQKsroDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjlav_YJ4MJmA31b1jEY2nsMiBaw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12945297</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nFhUT47wNKaesQKsroDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjlav_YJ4MJmA31b1jEY2nsMiBaw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VC5UT4v1IKT_sQKk8tyKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHl4iQLAqgT0MO5G5UuwFjtLrCYog" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12942039</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VC5UT4v1IKT_sQKk8tyKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHl4iQLAqgT0MO5G5UuwFjtLrCYog&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JwRUT4vWA-P2sQLU-oTwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjxu2Kw2A_YjWjicAEiTpXMPP4RQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12938631</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JwRUT4vWA-P2sQLU-oTwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjxu2Kw2A_YjWjicAEiTpXMPP4RQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9tlTT5-EO-HIsQKdhZHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGOhGx_dcU_eHBW1entDVEB1GDMig" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12933552</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9tlTT5-EO-HIsQKdhZHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGOhGx_dcU_eHBW1entDVEB1GDMig&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=069TT865DorgsQKw8oHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmbqTVGBfJkhh5H0saFj75wx6HzA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12927482</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=069TT865DorgsQKw8oHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmbqTVGBfJkhh5H0saFj75wx6HzA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OoZTT9j9I4TlsQKE7YHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZhTforMqUJ_sR5hrOmICpjAVrPA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12916204</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OoZTT9j9I4TlsQKE7YHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZhTforMqUJ_sR5hrOmICpjAVrPA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5GxTT8SNBovKsQKFo53wBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXECEyhyeyZHU108-blm4-klaOOQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12913180</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5GxTT8SNBovKsQKFo53wBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXECEyhyeyZHU108-blm4-klaOOQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iVtTT9jcKuiDsAL5wJjwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGbI0dKmLXzryvl-TSpKEgtY51S2g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12911306</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iVtTT9jcKuiDsAL5wJjwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGbI0dKmLXzryvl-TSpKEgtY51S2g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gjJTT-ChLYOosQK3kIHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH81gQA4TXZdK92kUfuw9b01rnUOQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12907918</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gjJTT-ChLYOosQK3kIHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH81gQA4TXZdK92kUfuw9b01rnUOQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HAdTT5HGKfLgsQK897HwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF3XLnISKO1K27cAo5XPE3qkO4v4A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12906613</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HAdTT5HGKfLgsQK897HwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDkQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF3XLnISKO1K27cAo5XPE3qkO4v4A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5txST5SwLaGGsgLBvZjwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5XhDQuoYuXTTjHywg77qAWwvMhg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12903216</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5txST5SwLaGGsgLBvZjwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5XhDQuoYuXTTjHywg77qAWwvMhg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sLJST-ToAe6CsgLTtZDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIsK68Pajxyt_79gMEhiTLCGy60A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12900178</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sLJST-ToAe6CsgLTtZDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIsK68Pajxyt_79gMEhiTLCGy60A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oohST7yhJuKHsgLygPXvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGWqiwex6G9qIDTNIcm6mSZs1BM1w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12895225</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oohST7yhJuKHsgLygPXvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGWqiwex6G9qIDTNIcm6mSZs1BM1w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bV5ST83rA5CFsAKm0IDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHLVT-oQDtAeB-OHBt8GGMXj-3rGQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12888843</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bV5ST83rA5CFsAKm0IDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHLVT-oQDtAeB-OHBt8GGMXj-3rGQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sjVST6-YPIegsgLQt9TvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFqx5IVkGOdIRIA5_Y24fK4eo-QTQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12877652</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sjVST6-YPIegsgLQt9TvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFqx5IVkGOdIRIA5_Y24fK4eo-QTQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nxZST76YOoSqsQKL7OHvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhYnemmQ_OV9xH0pe7Lbo5E2-T3Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12873998</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nxZST76YOoSqsQKL7OHvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhYnemmQ_OV9xH0pe7Lbo5E2-T3Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_QlST4HxD-SNsQKC5OTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGWoGlWhJfErXQBafh6RdxoKMiTMg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12872607</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_QlST4HxD-SNsQKC5OTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGWoGlWhJfErXQBafh6RdxoKMiTMg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OOBRT9GmKoGKsgL-lfTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGPQgGTux_pKdXBIIpNyuQZOLVePQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12868748</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OOBRT9GmKoGKsgL-lfTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGPQgGTux_pKdXBIIpNyuQZOLVePQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=o7VRT8YqqYOwAqun9O8F&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfVLyZJvRnjYnxsQC372JTwPm3Pg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12867366</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=o7VRT8YqqYOwAqun9O8F&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfVLyZJvRnjYnxsQC372JTwPm3Pg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W4tRT9vAGu3KsQLkoP3vBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGiGCeNAUXjadGc45_vfhGuFdfGCQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12860118</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W4tRT9vAGu3KsQLkoP3vBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDUQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGiGCeNAUXjadGc45_vfhGuFdfGCQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jWFRT6-pOYK40gHS1cnxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDoQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjGqaesqG4ulVNtbTrpYBNdLn2xw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12857112</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jWFRT6-pOYK40gHS1cnxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDoQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjGqaesqG4ulVNtbTrpYBNdLn2xw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DzdRT6CoBY3qtgfi0a2oDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHuTWZNSycozla67KGyQBZwcVpVpw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12852092</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DzdRT6CoBY3qtgfi0a2oDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHuTWZNSycozla67KGyQBZwcVpVpw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0gxRT8GVJqfDsQLtq9G-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF7Wi3Izh7VGYVrA8sHnH8GqVaS_w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12845661</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0gxRT8GVJqfDsQLtq9G-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF7Wi3Izh7VGYVrA8sHnH8GqVaS_w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=--NQT52IJaiPsQKI073BDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfjLH5g5klnTt5y9mDqYsPqGupJQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12834530</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=--NQT52IJaiPsQKI073BDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfjLH5g5klnTt5y9mDqYsPqGupJQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=68pQT7e0B4qGsALyxaC4Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDoQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfYxbZkiyikmkffaNYz2dokQCfdg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12831753</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=68pQT7e0B4qGsALyxaC4Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDoQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfYxbZkiyikmkffaNYz2dokQCfdg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jrhQT_exLKGQsALyqJneDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDoQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-nf4RO5Wgpz-LNkCN55RgmUoXFw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12829753</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jrhQT_exLKGQsALyqJneDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDoQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-nf4RO5Wgpz-LNkCN55RgmUoXFw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4o5QT-WWG4L4sQKbl5SiDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDoQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGax_aldp4FOvQbedPGX0gR-Lr1IQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12826556</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4o5QT-WWG4L4sQKbl5SiDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDoQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGax_aldp4FOvQbedPGX0gR-Lr1IQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PGRQT5CVB8-LsAK85PCoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDoQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRCfbT8KKSTr3WMkh0vt2mD7p0hQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12824909</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PGRQT5CVB8-LsAK85PCoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDoQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRCfbT8KKSTr3WMkh0vt2mD7p0hQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8TlQT7SEEePIsQKTz8W1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDoQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhIJ4XvC5vw2MjRUPEe5ElJGcoSg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12815765</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8TlQT7SEEePIsQKTz8W1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDoQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhIJ4XvC5vw2MjRUPEe5ElJGcoSg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yA9QT6SDPcelsAKbkoSnDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH92z9BvOjiLRb_nx_89hQ2VtomUg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12811059</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yA9QT6SDPcelsAKbkoSnDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH92z9BvOjiLRb_nx_89hQ2VtomUg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=guVPT7PZNNOBsgL9s_C6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHja8QqQHhkgLIp7PBW9vCU23MicQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12805890</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=guVPT7PZNNOBsgL9s_C6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHja8QqQHhkgLIp7PBW9vCU23MicQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dbtPT8y6B6X_sQLL0ZC8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGobt0eGSWV3zWhGjtO0zeZXAgo-w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12799165</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dbtPT8y6B6X_sQLL0ZC8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGobt0eGSWV3zWhGjtO0zeZXAgo-w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=65JPT6-rGqWlsALw0qyuDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMjm_tKo2eJSD5lVAMq2nYVyUt5Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12789684</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=65JPT6-rGqWlsALw0qyuDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMjm_tKo2eJSD5lVAMq2nYVyUt5Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BoZPT8aNH8OQgweK-NzpDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF_J7Cqxr8qTIpeOC7Qfw8haqoPhg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12788735</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BoZPT8aNH8OQgweK-NzpDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD8QmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF_J7Cqxr8qTIpeOC7Qfw8haqoPhg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U2dPT9XuGuj4sQKMytWtDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHawO1vaaxqKdqksUxPTW8NF5ZC-g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12786383</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U2dPT9XuGuj4sQKMytWtDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHawO1vaaxqKdqksUxPTW8NF5ZC-g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YT1PT5bBEZGosALLivmaDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF6Lm3_geyptQVdmlqhKc9wfTyuxg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12783751</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YT1PT5bBEZGosALLivmaDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF6Lm3_geyptQVdmlqhKc9wfTyuxg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=e-lOT-q7D4qKsgKErcjCDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiTr_hlvxQKFR3AS12rfWIgSSafA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12776257</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=e-lOT-q7D4qKsgKErcjCDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiTr_hlvxQKFR3AS12rfWIgSSafA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Kb5OT7-ENO2CsAKswOH7Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-ibLDL2n2cr6ny1QqBVi1OBoARw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12773714</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Kb5OT7-ENO2CsAKswOH7Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-ibLDL2n2cr6ny1QqBVi1OBoARw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C5ROT6nNKqaIsQLvoY0h&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEczZ-Bz7Wzmgvw5WxmxreO2fsnig" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12768627</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C5ROT6nNKqaIsQLvoY0h&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEczZ-Bz7Wzmgvw5WxmxreO2fsnig&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yGlOT4SgIOOssQLJ06Ak&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgH4EgsFRgslqa5UlmSCrhuppfHw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12761899</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yGlOT4SgIOOssQLJ06Ak&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgH4EgsFRgslqa5UlmSCrhuppfHw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=20BOT_vVNqqFsAL-350X&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFYKBGi1KSaPZpP1RUhIrAri_dBQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12750090</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=20BOT_vVNqqFsAL-350X&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFYKBGi1KSaPZpP1RUhIrAri_dBQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=20BOT_vVNqqFsAL-350X&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKhnvRhqpF6-3H0fgdMGu8q5NLzg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12750088</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=20BOT_vVNqqFsAL-350X&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKhnvRhqpF6-3H0fgdMGu8q5NLzg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5SBOT53hIYjpsQKAncn6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEREMtS7lw2Ol0jySNQZyHelFEupg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12746537</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5SBOT53hIYjpsQKAncn6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEREMtS7lw2Ol0jySNQZyHelFEupg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5SBOT53hIYjpsQKAncn6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFD0CiQ8u3eR-yCGBVV-zvyYqvk-g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12746535</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5SBOT53hIYjpsQKAncn6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFD0CiQ8u3eR-yCGBVV-zvyYqvk-g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=chVOT_jRDJKCsAKMubEL&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGICSl2J302ciZtwfpbuGMyO4qMPw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12745040</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=chVOT_jRDJKCsAKMubEL&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGICSl2J302ciZtwfpbuGMyO4qMPw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=chVOT_jRDJKCsAKMubEL&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfr_ZB6-TRX0oOln6VONMnPHyqkw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12745038</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=chVOT_jRDJKCsAKMubEL&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfr_ZB6-TRX0oOln6VONMnPHyqkw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7OtNT8OfKIWqsALvpLUK&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF8Xc0KA2YqCrL_y_jFMeeLxC_mFQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12741447</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7OtNT8OfKIWqsALvpLUK&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF8Xc0KA2YqCrL_y_jFMeeLxC_mFQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C8FNT8zqPOrHsQLi34gb&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXBu663b1JWhOlZPibOjt5puJSlQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12740094</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C8FNT8zqPOrHsQLi34gb&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXBu663b1JWhOlZPibOjt5puJSlQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=15ZNT4DZFIWKsALD1uwb&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESnvlCr6lCVu6lUIHL2t0Lbt1YVA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12736120</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=15ZNT4DZFIWKsALD1uwb&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESnvlCr6lCVu6lUIHL2t0Lbt1YVA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sWxNT-6UFa6DsAKRltgR&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0m83wQgXZmpNfsmRNzxfre5dpnQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12733158</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sWxNT-6UFa6DsAKRltgR&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0m83wQgXZmpNfsmRNzxfre5dpnQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dkJNT_quHJDrgQfrjZ3KAg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGsE3iq7g0RzqAfCW6J3GN0bdHo1g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12728264</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dkJNT_quHJDrgQfrjZ3KAg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGsE3iq7g0RzqAfCW6J3GN0bdHo1g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PBhNT8K7LNHIsQLNmJkT&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG1xaqyDjt_ZnB8H-dBVKL5us9oMg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12721681</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PBhNT8K7LNHIsQLNmJkT&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG1xaqyDjt_ZnB8H-dBVKL5us9oMg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=D-9MT4_kGLCrsAKtoJn6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFnbPxcCKYAa401bP_J9AVOVs3kPw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12710315</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=D-9MT4_kGLCrsAKtoJn6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFnbPxcCKYAa401bP_J9AVOVs3kPw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=V9JMT7S3IIj7sQKP9tke&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-DDeMKjCn9w_aFBrxqFeW1e8IqA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12706667</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=V9JMT7S3IIj7sQKP9tke&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-DDeMKjCn9w_aFBrxqFeW1e8IqA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0cNMT4bWAqiHsAKvsq0U&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwb3cenpHlrXjGzpP4ZdHK9lo2ZQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12704896</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0cNMT4bWAqiHsAKvsq0U&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwb3cenpHlrXjGzpP4ZdHK9lo2ZQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=85pMT7e8O--psAKYo9QZ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQE3bWbrQdMtHGRNN0sSx3Ifp1FA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12701812</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=85pMT7e8O--psAKYo9QZ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQE3bWbrQdMtHGRNN0sSx3Ifp1FA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pm9MT8G5NqmasgKX--0T&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHxKoAmfkdBsfrVWv6onpmdQHh2_w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12700508</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pm9MT8G5NqmasgKX--0T&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHxKoAmfkdBsfrVWv6onpmdQHh2_w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SUVMT9fqNeT_sQLl2_H6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPrzzm_e3Vn5gK5aaThZGUH44SvA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12697099</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SUVMT9fqNeT_sQLl2_H6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPrzzm_e3Vn5gK5aaThZGUH44SvA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NBtMT7X6Fs3jsQKhm70L&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFcU1kcOWLytAL-Zo07NXoETR3n1Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12695746</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NBtMT7X6Fs3jsQKhm70L&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFcU1kcOWLytAL-Zo07NXoETR3n1Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zfBLT8_eJ6uDsgKR9PnqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFaEnf9gz8QzcEMRZerBRY3YGNAQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12690879</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zfBLT8_eJ6uDsgKR9PnqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFaEnf9gz8QzcEMRZerBRY3YGNAQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ncZLT82gB7OGsgLlot3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBoiVBZK5bWRD3UVdEWgcfKJ6X9w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12684280</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ncZLT82gB7OGsgLlot3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBoiVBZK5bWRD3UVdEWgcfKJ6X9w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U51LT5iqNKWusAKR4fDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUE1AeocEipQsoGMV0SXM7lmVang" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12672921</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U51LT5iqNKWusAKR4fDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUE1AeocEipQsoGMV0SXM7lmVang&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rHpLT5KUJI74sQL_6vXqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHgXJXms3pdBLqK6ttIxoUcxX4IQw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12668398</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rHpLT5KUJI74sQL_6vXqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHgXJXms3pdBLqK6ttIxoUcxX4IQw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PnJLT77JBfOpsALxounqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF2eODnzZcGe_yojTp_SMX6VzVM3Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12667252</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PnJLT77JBfOpsALxounqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF2eODnzZcGe_yojTp_SMX6VzVM3Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ekhLT-bvDYj9sQLa5MDXDA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4xOEcCgOrbGCo9nUnqo9nyeh2bg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12663630</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ekhLT-bvDYj9sQLa5MDXDA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4xOEcCgOrbGCo9nUnqo9nyeh2bg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vh1LT7ehAtTCsQKL3_XqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuiYF1cERjXrfy4crRZTUQHQAkxw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12662379</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vh1LT7ehAtTCsQKL3_XqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuiYF1cERjXrfy4crRZTUQHQAkxw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rfNKT_bvJsvjsQKktuzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwrn714nVIiDD4R-jBWbRRO9e-iA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12659376</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rfNKT_bvJsvjsQKktuzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwrn714nVIiDD4R-jBWbRRO9e-iA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fslKT7PBJ4eAsgKx7PTqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmcE-Lf6JAi4gGDMTzjE6Qp3UB7g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12658672</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fslKT7PBJ4eAsgKx7PTqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmcE-Lf6JAi4gGDMTzjE6Qp3UB7g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Qp9KT4P8PIyGsgKp35HrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGT-qKkmzBaDUvhVUil5xqB2Vo7-g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12654101</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Qp9KT4P8PIyGsgKp35HrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGT-qKkmzBaDUvhVUil5xqB2Vo7-g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Qp9KT4P8PIyGsgKp35HrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYSP0mZzY6Oc26XkEVHJsoSBfI6w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12654098</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Qp9KT4P8PIyGsgKp35HrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYSP0mZzY6Oc26XkEVHJsoSBfI6w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GXVKT4KrDYH0sQK0xd3FBA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvTfRfmxiQVadOjtb_EFb3Difd5Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12647348</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GXVKT4KrDYH0sQK0xd3FBA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvTfRfmxiQVadOjtb_EFb3Difd5Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GXVKT4KrDYH0sQK0xd3FBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7E7Z53Vdtk2uh5qnx8KxBPce9Lg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12647343</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GXVKT4KrDYH0sQK0xd3FBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7E7Z53Vdtk2uh5qnx8KxBPce9Lg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J0tKT4WOBaP4sQLj7u3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGGqvakPa88h2FhZJVqbuFhPInXhA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12635550</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J0tKT4WOBaP4sQLj7u3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGGqvakPa88h2FhZJVqbuFhPInXhA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J0tKT4WOBaP4sQLj7u3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEs-UOQ4QdIIKgjoTkCsvxVM9_ZfQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12635547</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J0tKT4WOBaP4sQLj7u3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEs-UOQ4QdIIKgjoTkCsvxVM9_ZfQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iyhKT4KMDamlsAK2mvzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGMG4qqDIWsu7CBFLLcy_L0TtTVQA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12630890</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iyhKT4KMDamlsAK2mvzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGMG4qqDIWsu7CBFLLcy_L0TtTVQA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iyhKT4KMDamlsAK2mvzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZFFedqydYjQ_UdAKxAsEA60cQ0Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12630887</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iyhKT4KMDamlsAK2mvzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZFFedqydYjQ_UdAKxAsEA60cQ0Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tSBKT-3MCeL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoft0LApbnRUEuORghIBIUpJT9iw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12629831</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tSBKT-3MCeL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoft0LApbnRUEuORghIBIUpJT9iw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tSBKT-3MCeL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5wX1O2si89v8jERKcBilpcfZndw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12629828</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tSBKT-3MCeL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5wX1O2si89v8jERKcBilpcfZndw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0fZJT9LeNcOGsgKho_TqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHAzEB5F0L9OQ1sziKY43JiuqilaQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12626077</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0fZJT9LeNcOGsgKho_TqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHAzEB5F0L9OQ1sziKY43JiuqilaQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0fZJT9LeNcOGsgKho_TqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESj7cQlitNUU5iGA5CwboV6zWwtA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12626074</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0fZJT9LeNcOGsgKho_TqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESj7cQlitNUU5iGA5CwboV6zWwtA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P8xJT9SpKrDKsQKP2YjrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsx7pP84Jr0s64ApCPIB-KbWlyTQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12624747</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P8xJT9SpKrDKsQKP2YjrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsx7pP84Jr0s64ApCPIB-KbWlyTQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P8xJT9SpKrDKsQKP2YjrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFo0Mkd-k0eRqXktnyPbRvR_g3EQg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12624745</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P8xJT9SpKrDKsQKP2YjrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFo0Mkd-k0eRqXktnyPbRvR_g3EQg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JaJJT7i8HcfhsQKksITrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_ffW2CvamAeTjzQlHOg0PCPo6ow" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12621570</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JaJJT7i8HcfhsQKksITrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_ffW2CvamAeTjzQlHOg0PCPo6ow&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JaJJT7i8HcfhsQKksITrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7sab_ig87lslmiGiwHMT5BaTG0A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12621567</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JaJJT7i8HcfhsQKksITrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7sab_ig87lslmiGiwHMT5BaTG0A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7XdJT9GbAsWssQKKkOTqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcdgot2Bb2x63ODBVWJO0ufkxzhQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12620314</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7XdJT9GbAsWssQKKkOTqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcdgot2Bb2x63ODBVWJO0ufkxzhQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7XdJT9GbAsWssQKKkOTqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHRYujPu6NEVkeLDE6yVyTIiRFrJQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12620309</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7XdJT9GbAsWssQKKkOTqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHRYujPu6NEVkeLDE6yVyTIiRFrJQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wk1JT7TtCcXMsQKsu_HqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYGrAXzMANSSWf5zNWIYKZ1q_Ngg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12615322</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wk1JT7TtCcXMsQKsu_HqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYGrAXzMANSSWf5zNWIYKZ1q_Ngg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wk1JT7TtCcXMsQKsu_HqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNExf0a7lbby_pyfR05GtuWRgJjHaQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12615319</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wk1JT7TtCcXMsQKsu_HqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNExf0a7lbby_pyfR05GtuWRgJjHaQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kyNJT5_DDYH5sQKfn_jzCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHaM0YiWYSeRKJQOl1SOtTGr_759w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12608487</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kyNJT5_DDYH5sQKfn_jzCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHaM0YiWYSeRKJQOl1SOtTGr_759w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kyNJT5_DDYH5sQKfn_jzCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfa79MHaOcGgC0iZTbC7gryiNB4Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12608484</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kyNJT5_DDYH5sQKfn_jzCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfa79MHaOcGgC0iZTbC7gryiNB4Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zflIT5_ILoT_sQLRyKHzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFd94u8Z9oiIuq7PqdS42V538u3BQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12596598</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zflIT5_ILoT_sQLRyKHzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFd94u8Z9oiIuq7PqdS42V538u3BQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zflIT5_ILoT_sQLRyKHzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHv06Ul5IZOUMpzxnNFNcqM0tqiwA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12596595</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zflIT5_ILoT_sQLRyKHzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHv06Ul5IZOUMpzxnNFNcqM0tqiwA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KNZIT4LQN430sQKiv5TrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-Aa75iUQ-zMlmeeD2yymC0Rj62w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12592439</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KNZIT4LQN430sQKiv5TrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-Aa75iUQ-zMlmeeD2yymC0Rj62w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KNZIT4LQN430sQKiv5TrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSFKtBk64ZyWqmtVc6pjKy0zeISw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12592436</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KNZIT4LQN430sQKiv5TrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSFKtBk64ZyWqmtVc6pjKy0zeISw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OM9IT6L0HKyAsgKK-_DqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGr3UkWIkLIsxZgm8269oIty3ZMqg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12591500</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OM9IT6L0HKyAsgKK-_DqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGr3UkWIkLIsxZgm8269oIty3ZMqg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OM9IT6L0HKyAsgKK-_DqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHprkcDUhDbP1OHquCcO3cZvIZXJg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12591497</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OM9IT6L0HKyAsgKK-_DqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHprkcDUhDbP1OHquCcO3cZvIZXJg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=k6VIT6mAApKNsALpx6zmCg&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnduIr15RzJfXGcOCfqihDjGHYEA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12587660</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=k6VIT6mAApKNsALpx6zmCg&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnduIr15RzJfXGcOCfqihDjGHYEA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=k6VIT6mAApKNsALpx6zmCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqJZyVnWE7NOcKYrPCWTWMo8CVVQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12587657</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=k6VIT6mAApKNsALpx6zmCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqJZyVnWE7NOcKYrPCWTWMo8CVVQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=33pIT4bGAuL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGITAi1VnTBbwViWo1Ss2YNTUT4fw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12586309</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=33pIT4bGAuL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGITAi1VnTBbwViWo1Ss2YNTUT4fw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=33pIT4bGAuL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFAs-_74E3TV_9wK0a4dpLwV1IH2w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12586306</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=33pIT4bGAuL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFAs-_74E3TV_9wK0a4dpLwV1IH2w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVBIT_KvOYaFsALAwPjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuvdXk1rXV6TAUXBTVAkdC98ZENw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12582534</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVBIT_KvOYaFsALAwPjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuvdXk1rXV6TAUXBTVAkdC98ZENw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVBIT_KvOYaFsALAwPjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdfBUvzOInYyN1Kb_r763AH-sHRw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12582531</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVBIT_KvOYaFsALAwPjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdfBUvzOInYyN1Kb_r763AH-sHRw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eSZIT7XQJMWGsgKs04jrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5i4X13SW7WpZ9QFJw0FbaZ6lfzg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12580443</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eSZIT7XQJMWGsgKs04jrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5i4X13SW7WpZ9QFJw0FbaZ6lfzg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eSZIT7XQJMWGsgKs04jrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRxiJj5Ya4_oDiEuA04MM3MhUWIA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12580440</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eSZIT7XQJMWGsgKs04jrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRxiJj5Ya4_oDiEuA04MM3MhUWIA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WfxHT7SSLunKsQLtobWdBA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRM_P7Rm_5SyDSuklF85yMyBBAjg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12575473</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WfxHT7SSLunKsQLtobWdBA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRM_P7Rm_5SyDSuklF85yMyBBAjg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WfxHT7SSLunKsQLtobWdBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwNORFISfUQXQ03pJL1KxiMq4GGA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12575470</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WfxHT7SSLunKsQLtobWdBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwNORFISfUQXQ03pJL1KxiMq4GGA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M9JHT6j2C-fnsQKEpOnqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHTsNJOxsRO7-mG4NBgOKfytnffFg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12569216</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M9JHT6j2C-fnsQKEpOnqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHTsNJOxsRO7-mG4NBgOKfytnffFg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M9JHT6j2C-fnsQKEpOnqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEpSNsionq9wqeukZMsP0s5mNV6Bw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12569210</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M9JHT6j2C-fnsQKEpOnqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEpSNsionq9wqeukZMsP0s5mNV6Bw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=46hHT5aVMPPMsQLGuPDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHctRTRN6_IzRpbRl0Ww5NSgCfpXQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12557655</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=46hHT5aVMPPMsQLGuPDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHctRTRN6_IzRpbRl0Ww5NSgCfpXQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=46hHT5aVMPPMsQLGuPDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGBP1BEWb8g8u1eVePIsa2S-9YJ8A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12557652</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=46hHT5aVMPPMsQLGuPDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGBP1BEWb8g8u1eVePIsa2S-9YJ8A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6oFHT7GXKc6ztwec4dSfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVwMm57s_t7bm5zQaPreqxfoMCLA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12552992</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6oFHT7GXKc6ztwec4dSfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD4QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVwMm57s_t7bm5zQaPreqxfoMCLA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6oFHT7GXKc6ztwec4dSfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGT9tm8S0iZi7hwWKmR2nwbrTPKgg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12552989</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6oFHT7GXKc6ztwec4dSfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGT9tm8S0iZi7hwWKmR2nwbrTPKgg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wH1HT66iMMe9gAfKnrmmDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEZujBcaofNCA8IaZWqZTVTT2c6Yg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12552441</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wH1HT66iMMe9gAfKnrmmDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEZujBcaofNCA8IaZWqZTVTT2c6Yg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wH1HT66iMMe9gAfKnrmmDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_avLipW6oZ3aWvRz_x-VeBfZVbA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12552437</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wH1HT66iMMe9gAfKnrmmDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_avLipW6oZ3aWvRz_x-VeBfZVbA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01NHT7uBNfLFsQLXwtjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH3zS1TsMWCPopQkxYNLHdOQ4A1qw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12548182</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01NHT7uBNfLFsQLXwtjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH3zS1TsMWCPopQkxYNLHdOQ4A1qw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01NHT7uBNfLFsQLXwtjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFyvvpe1ARHOj1PwfUChlCecDKxWA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12548178</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01NHT7uBNfLFsQLXwtjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFyvvpe1ARHOj1PwfUChlCecDKxWA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QylHT83TLYaosQLipenqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6S2mN51jDM7lLiq6lXEiEb6LTwQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12546782</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QylHT83TLYaosQLipenqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6S2mN51jDM7lLiq6lXEiEb6LTwQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QylHT83TLYaosQLipenqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGeG1wt9ZAlgh_YZd3fVz0hpM3Liw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12546778</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QylHT83TLYaosQLipenqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGeG1wt9ZAlgh_YZd3fVz0hpM3Liw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mf9GT7-HG8qwsAK3ndzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDJuJzrqOuqX80A84l4K2Qvs5URQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12543049</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mf9GT7-HG8qwsAK3ndzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDJuJzrqOuqX80A84l4K2Qvs5URQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mf9GT7-HG8qwsAK3ndzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHEi35OsiOyo59isWQoYZ78FE6fHw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12543045</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mf9GT7-HG8qwsAK3ndzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHEi35OsiOyo59isWQoYZ78FE6fHw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EtVGT_2-B6WlsALDosXqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE6sVkmtvzT9UgXywCTbCAh9CZm6w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12540974</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EtVGT_2-B6WlsALDosXqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE6sVkmtvzT9UgXywCTbCAh9CZm6w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EtVGT_2-B6WlsALDosXqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8HFL4EeWHJVDVkguYwjzStafsIg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12540970</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EtVGT_2-B6WlsALDosXqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8HFL4EeWHJVDVkguYwjzStafsIg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=36pGT-uANommgweI0sGlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHeFfCiEN049HwTQ2Xf4IAa7OW4eA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12535914</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=36pGT-uANommgweI0sGlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHeFfCiEN049HwTQ2Xf4IAa7OW4eA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=36pGT-uANommgweI0sGlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzY35mfulGEIfhBFKSY2GRn0VIqQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12535910</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=36pGT-uANommgweI0sGlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzY35mfulGEIfhBFKSY2GRn0VIqQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p4BGT-KWGdH0ggfbv8iLDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFWIf9DHS1fqw7tpdRzrc41BWb8g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12529074</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p4BGT-KWGdH0ggfbv8iLDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFWIf9DHS1fqw7tpdRzrc41BWb8g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p4BGT-KWGdH0ggfbv8iLDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNETWPLzfAzAkCifVqPcDoCtgI9OHw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12529067</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p4BGT-KWGdH0ggfbv8iLDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNETWPLzfAzAkCifVqPcDoCtgI9OHw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7FZGT9DSAoW0gwehk6nvDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0GA-MdCkqeq22wXEB2Z5dHxGh3g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12517420</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7FZGT9DSAoW0gwehk6nvDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0GA-MdCkqeq22wXEB2Z5dHxGh3g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fjFGT7W-D46HsALjiJD1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGa-GUibwXTp9bQ84ySQ2laMo1ntg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12513743</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fjFGT7W-D46HsALjiJD1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGa-GUibwXTp9bQ84ySQ2laMo1ntg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fjFGT7W-D46HsALjiJD1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8FegZSfXmByuW_ht0EZCW4EiTiA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12513738</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fjFGT7W-D46HsALjiJD1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8FegZSfXmByuW_ht0EZCW4EiTiA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PSxGT6CNC9OmsAKz0YjODg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZPHgRyOosONFRL0PKAWyARQ942A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12513010</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PSxGT6CNC9OmsAKz0YjODg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZPHgRyOosONFRL0PKAWyARQ942A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PSxGT6CNC9OmsAKz0YjODg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEkCxY9mboRJvvTCV0jRbBKdAkPNQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12513005</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PSxGT6CNC9OmsAKz0YjODg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEkCxY9mboRJvvTCV0jRbBKdAkPNQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dwJGT_-lBsWrsQL1lIXlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZpEUACQQn7pYxVivvWSGoksCwCw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12509000</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dwJGT_-lBsWrsQL1lIXlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZpEUACQQn7pYxVivvWSGoksCwCw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dwJGT_-lBsWrsQL1lIXlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHaxZDXMfn_qy-P_riDh5PjEmtTSw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12508995</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dwJGT_-lBsWrsQL1lIXlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHaxZDXMfn_qy-P_riDh5PjEmtTSw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4tdFT4j5OuqEsAKAuLXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFC9anEOV3rH7Sf21fuJdtfQ9zVjQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12507681</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4tdFT4j5OuqEsAKAuLXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFC9anEOV3rH7Sf21fuJdtfQ9zVjQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4tdFT4j5OuqEsAKAuLXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1kOXFmifs_mu47TeuZCiyy8BOEQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12507676</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4tdFT4j5OuqEsAKAuLXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1kOXFmifs_mu47TeuZCiyy8BOEQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=t61FT7fcL9TfsQK425TEDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH22iVudg1-zJQRd9esSgHzLFeZhQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12503990</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=t61FT7fcL9TfsQK425TEDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH22iVudg1-zJQRd9esSgHzLFeZhQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=t61FT7fcL9TfsQK425TEDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEMBLA4F0tDeryhlZcmnc7LqRwx-w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12503985</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=t61FT7fcL9TfsQK425TEDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEMBLA4F0tDeryhlZcmnc7LqRwx-w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dINFT97IFqbEsQL96v3DDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQaKth_s6nsemi11KmKnLPKVHkcg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12501709</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dINFT97IFqbEsQL96v3DDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQaKth_s6nsemi11KmKnLPKVHkcg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dINFT97IFqbEsQL96v3DDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFxZ-dqKv5lXkVQuY-LxFDUNRWwvA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12501704</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dINFT97IFqbEsQL96v3DDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFxZ-dqKv5lXkVQuY-LxFDUNRWwvA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RFlFT8LaBeiCsALv66DDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEglVttshQ3e5HXtaCSfS-tiSyopQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12496717</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RFlFT8LaBeiCsALv66DDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEglVttshQ3e5HXtaCSfS-tiSyopQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RFlFT8LaBeiCsALv66DDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGR-divOmThDTpBOIrrAvDV3KTvcg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12496711</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RFlFT8LaBeiCsALv66DDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGR-divOmThDTpBOIrrAvDV3KTvcg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gy9FT7zyCqOJsQKghfTCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGyHPJk2ewtAbSGW_j_hqzDEnjfww" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12490790</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gy9FT7zyCqOJsQKghfTCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGyHPJk2ewtAbSGW_j_hqzDEnjfww&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gy9FT7zyCqOJsQKghfTCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHY1QuZXDNtWvlzR9lYSKxHvMwf6Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12490784</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gy9FT7zyCqOJsQKghfTCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHY1QuZXDNtWvlzR9lYSKxHvMwf6Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lAVFT6qEJ8SusQLN1YTDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGyqQ3q2fVGnf9njiZWVmPP2t-FiQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12479282</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lAVFT6qEJ8SusQLN1YTDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGyqQ3q2fVGnf9njiZWVmPP2t-FiQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ueJET_aOJ8X0sQLKn8zCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFh_jPIhltrL0VQgsbZXBI0BuKfVQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12474771</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ueJET_aOJ8X0sQLKn8zCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFh_jPIhltrL0VQgsbZXBI0BuKfVQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tNpET4jiGIuGsgKUtZzDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEK5MJdIakvGl73DZ7pZ2LWW6a9YA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12473720</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tNpET4jiGIuGsgKUtZzDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEK5MJdIakvGl73DZ7pZ2LWW6a9YA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6LBET_mqIejlsQKnts3CDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVfw4PbJDsTXL-6cuK4BoUWXTBCg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12470050</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6LBET_mqIejlsQKnts3CDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVfw4PbJDsTXL-6cuK4BoUWXTBCg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QIZET5PBGuHksQLx6IHDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdDE10AJju7cCjj7_fZfUcIO3BDg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12468813</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QIZET5PBGuHksQLx6IHDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdDE10AJju7cCjj7_fZfUcIO3BDg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OlxET6L6KtOlsALUsIXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjPu5FR0VF2jU4l9pcXPTTH6zb2A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12465181</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OlxET6L6KtOlsALUsIXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjPu5FR0VF2jU4l9pcXPTTH6zb2A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OlxET6L6KtOlsALUsIXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHkZ9CrUb6quOZYnfG_c-gGFhJi1g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12465176</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OlxET6L6KtOlsALUsIXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHkZ9CrUb6quOZYnfG_c-gGFhJi1g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8DFET4y4FI6GsgLUuYDDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnAzRU8e1FusEnuyiDadu1ItBJYw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12464406</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8DFET4y4FI6GsgLUuYDDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnAzRU8e1FusEnuyiDadu1ItBJYw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8DFET4y4FI6GsgLUuYDDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGx-gQPjOOt2-CDL-vQnKkjSDCnSw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12464401</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8DFET4y4FI6GsgLUuYDDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGx-gQPjOOt2-CDL-vQnKkjSDCnSw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2wdET8f5Mabe2AXI1qWZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEguZW30FcQK-gxnDwwIQCfyyVoeQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12460137</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2wdET8f5Mabe2AXI1qWZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEguZW30FcQK-gxnDwwIQCfyyVoeQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2wdET8f5Mabe2AXI1qWZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERAPZ7TOjYTyjmcCPkePWlJ3HanA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12460132</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2wdET8f5Mabe2AXI1qWZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERAPZ7TOjYTyjmcCPkePWlJ3HanA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m91DT93DBMno2AXU-qHSBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXJ0TrCMAdnDZ8V-_UEpkiwW67gg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12453561</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m91DT93DBMno2AXU-qHSBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXJ0TrCMAdnDZ8V-_UEpkiwW67gg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m91DT93DBMno2AXU-qHSBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGkN2_aGDYd1nwr_V4QTCZdKHhDyA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12453556</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m91DT93DBMno2AXU-qHSBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGkN2_aGDYd1nwr_V4QTCZdKHhDyA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QbRDT53oBY_vggeskbCGCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG20MBu60eEe8PdU4Kn7_nZSjwmEQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12441755</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QbRDT53oBY_vggeskbCGCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG20MBu60eEe8PdU4Kn7_nZSjwmEQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QbRDT53oBY_vggeskbCGCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEGVP-lo5BiFL9N1gApoR1J2DQ3kQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12441748</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QbRDT53oBY_vggeskbCGCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEGVP-lo5BiFL9N1gApoR1J2DQ3kQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UolDT4mBE8a2gwf-nO2FDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhQnaoU50wn6k16pT_df7c3BvNew" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12436398</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UolDT4mBE8a2gwf-nO2FDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhQnaoU50wn6k16pT_df7c3BvNew&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UolDT4mBE8a2gwf-nO2FDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4Zz88_zxWJ6kM2XzWlwHzbJePnw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12436393</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UolDT4mBE8a2gwf-nO2FDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4Zz88_zxWJ6kM2XzWlwHzbJePnw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pIdDT7yiJoPoggf4yNGYCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPpWAwpfzGA8SHWJVeDP0HMUMJcA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12436128</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pIdDT7yiJoPoggf4yNGYCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPpWAwpfzGA8SHWJVeDP0HMUMJcA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pIdDT7yiJoPoggf4yNGYCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH3P0cpMLSDIvdNlB1D2y55rAdVqA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12436123</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pIdDT7yiJoPoggf4yNGYCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH3P0cpMLSDIvdNlB1D2y55rAdVqA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EF9DT8HRDeea2AWW6dSTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcRPiBWVSyauMmpzTaLKG2dz9Z0A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12431480</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EF9DT8HRDeea2AWW6dSTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcRPiBWVSyauMmpzTaLKG2dz9Z0A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EF9DT8HRDeea2AWW6dSTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHljZ7mprX7QigLz1QsgAmhyRN9LQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12431475</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EF9DT8HRDeea2AWW6dSTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHljZ7mprX7QigLz1QsgAmhyRN9LQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2DRDT6X6IISy2QWwsLSiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEuhiFGSXg2uRMeGIIg_yE83cKz2Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12430317</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2DRDT6X6IISy2QWwsLSiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEuhiFGSXg2uRMeGIIg_yE83cKz2Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2DRDT6X6IISy2QWwsLSiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-k25JJXTkqmn3nj0EqhKzmDMybA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12430312</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2DRDT6X6IISy2QWwsLSiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-k25JJXTkqmn3nj0EqhKzmDMybA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8QpDT_LsMaTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGX67dp_b1GU4Y6Hi9YTIXmC7Myfg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12426986</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8QpDT_LsMaTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGX67dp_b1GU4Y6Hi9YTIXmC7Myfg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8QpDT_LsMaTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8rkpRtr3bGu0REKV5J9xvfDqSKg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12426981</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8QpDT_LsMaTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8rkpRtr3bGu0REKV5J9xvfDqSKg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r-BCT6X1C4iI2gW4p6GvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESoK9oSrZu6GoAU4qCHoBF6c22nw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12426533</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r-BCT6X1C4iI2gW4p6GvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESoK9oSrZu6GoAU4qCHoBF6c22nw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r-BCT6X1C4iI2gW4p6GvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYDIgXo6VP5ihviDpkXNC_kMISPQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12426528</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r-BCT6X1C4iI2gW4p6GvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYDIgXo6VP5ihviDpkXNC_kMISPQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W7ZCT_i8HsTC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEa2cke0Srxa9I3Y9r8JbnpMmp6ng" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12422651</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W7ZCT_i8HsTC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEa2cke0Srxa9I3Y9r8JbnpMmp6ng&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W7ZCT_i8HsTC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHTFWZatwlsrzRlARisWMxNfiRsuw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12422646</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W7ZCT_i8HsTC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHTFWZatwlsrzRlARisWMxNfiRsuw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JYxCT_fGJMbg2AXO66ymCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGCjcmPc7-U-va5fpzc-zFJAWhfbw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12416224</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JYxCT_fGJMbg2AXO66ymCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGCjcmPc7-U-va5fpzc-zFJAWhfbw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JYxCT_fGJMbg2AXO66ymCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE3M63TQCZW75NFUmEjNjfphpnosg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12416219</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JYxCT_fGJMbg2AXO66ymCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE3M63TQCZW75NFUmEjNjfphpnosg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UWJCT-zXOqW62gXGpZS0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-HicXjQ4AE-ZlXJcfZsX9d86zHg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12404239</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UWJCT-zXOqW62gXGpZS0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-HicXjQ4AE-ZlXJcfZsX9d86zHg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UWJCT-zXOqW62gXGpZS0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzzMPyqcb77amV4rwUQ9Txnkqncg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12404234</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UWJCT-zXOqW62gXGpZS0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzzMPyqcb77amV4rwUQ9Txnkqncg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzdCT_vlOeKC2wXYmcWvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEQTPsf_44nO9DCGBa4oWBxMUtjKg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12398581</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzdCT_vlOeKC2wXYmcWvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEQTPsf_44nO9DCGBa4oWBxMUtjKg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzdCT_vlOeKC2wXYmcWvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE3XxhtVur8qu8b5AZScD0cGqG90g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12398576</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzdCT_vlOeKC2wXYmcWvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE3XxhtVur8qu8b5AZScD0cGqG90g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xDNCT7ilLofU2AW6oKjCCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjgwjNiFTsbQNBuQiX8Y8M8bb2ig" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12397947</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xDNCT7ilLofU2AW6oKjCCw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjgwjNiFTsbQNBuQiX8Y8M8bb2ig&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xDNCT7ilLofU2AW6oKjCCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLFqay21Pl-wwWWQIKHHxhsprzRQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12397942</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xDNCT7ilLofU2AW6oKjCCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLFqay21Pl-wwWWQIKHHxhsprzRQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gQ1CT5WDHqTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsRVeDxzXeQFr7D7Lnw9Yr00phBA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12393497</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gQ1CT5WDHqTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsRVeDxzXeQFr7D7Lnw9Yr00phBA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gQ1CT5WDHqTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHb-iI4MwzWLMpf7me-iW2XQl3e9A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12393492</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gQ1CT5WDHqTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHb-iI4MwzWLMpf7me-iW2XQl3e9A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R-NBT-igL4XY2QXS7JSDCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTLYRYBrggLgEbgvhZtjrjtfU4Ig" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12392267</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R-NBT-igL4XY2QXS7JSDCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTLYRYBrggLgEbgvhZtjrjtfU4Ig&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R-NBT-igL4XY2QXS7JSDCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHuSeLncKysHeU4tWuq3-BZxwn4nw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12392262</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R-NBT-igL4XY2QXS7JSDCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHuSeLncKysHeU4tWuq3-BZxwn4nw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R7lBT4udNcr02QWD2OGZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEWx7zUiwPP3pmcy_40QEQLp1no2w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12389163</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R7lBT4udNcr02QWD2OGZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEWx7zUiwPP3pmcy_40QEQLp1no2w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R7lBT4udNcr02QWD2OGZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGFRyTdKK4ni66aYv4pnnxkm_xmtQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12389158</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R7lBT4udNcr02QWD2OGZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGFRyTdKK4ni66aYv4pnnxkm_xmtQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GY9BT-ylPOOQ2QWH_YykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlbgm_PqPc51fyJOElIcrERtm8kw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12389059</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GY9BT-ylPOOQ2QWH_YykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlbgm_PqPc51fyJOElIcrERtm8kw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GY9BT-ylPOOQ2QWH_YykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwg9iC6tl8ysePIfaXH9gH09ktkg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12389053</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GY9BT-ylPOOQ2QWH_YykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwg9iC6tl8ysePIfaXH9gH09ktkg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5mRBT6bBCKLM2AX_x9H_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHEA14gSLY84h5hR4qI_4ddRnBqEw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12385084</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5mRBT6bBCKLM2AX_x9H_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHEA14gSLY84h5hR4qI_4ddRnBqEw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5mRBT6bBCKLM2AX_x9H_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZ4qK7eFljQE7QyJSHeNKLC9swFQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12385078</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5mRBT6bBCKLM2AX_x9H_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZ4qK7eFljQE7QyJSHeNKLC9swFQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vDpBT-zzH-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4zUtbYG_KBBJJkHq6ztw7uYyRBA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12378627</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vDpBT-zzH-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4zUtbYG_KBBJJkHq6ztw7uYyRBA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vDpBT-zzH-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFHZeE0QuNUJ3U_h-ITJ-YDfZUbig" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12378621</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vDpBT-zzH-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFHZeE0QuNUJ3U_h-ITJ-YDfZUbig&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jhBBT7KhDujo2gWLo92kCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF_lLgJRiSw-mxurVt6-1YkYj4e-Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12366544</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jhBBT7KhDujo2gWLo92kCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF_lLgJRiSw-mxurVt6-1YkYj4e-Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XeZAT-DqF4ni2AW7htydCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEEy2nxj6Wc9whI5hkxI6eABDCq1w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12360832</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XeZAT-DqF4ni2AW7htydCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEEy2nxj6Wc9whI5hkxI6eABDCq1w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=peFAT7vED-bc2QWz09moDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGd_pbUzlraK3sLNp7_hq6cXtqr6Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12360101</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=peFAT7vED-bc2QWz09moDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGd_pbUzlraK3sLNp7_hq6cXtqr6Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-LtAT7u1EqWe2AWK2KybCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJCcmc1ZOL2ZY_Hcgvk2MtaerENA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12355614</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-LtAT7u1EqWe2AWK2KybCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJCcmc1ZOL2ZY_Hcgvk2MtaerENA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0JFAT66vJMv-2QWH1IGICA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGAdooj5WaPzc5STB7SFohZgDTVYQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12354341</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0JFAT66vJMv-2QWH1IGICA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGAdooj5WaPzc5STB7SFohZgDTVYQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=52dAT8OWNbPE2QWxwKyfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFnoSX22hn0iLnkOpwX-alwktejYQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12350939</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=52dAT8OWNbPE2QWxwKyfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFnoSX22hn0iLnkOpwX-alwktejYQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oz1AT6LMFsLy2QXPpK2DCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFtotaC5ZlUTuzykJS4DGnArKj48w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12350814</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oz1AT6LMFsLy2QXPpK2DCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFtotaC5ZlUTuzykJS4DGnArKj48w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XRNAT8ToJsOg2gXrs_mPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCK6PdHpXnsSoj8v3sCAoVAfMjfg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12346808</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XRNAT8ToJsOg2gXrs_mPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEwQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCK6PdHpXnsSoj8v3sCAoVAfMjfg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XRNAT8ToJsOg2gXrs_mPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_zdjWQ8qcGu0vYDzRMb9UgpCQ-Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12346803</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XRNAT8ToJsOg2gXrs_mPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_zdjWQ8qcGu0vYDzRMb9UgpCQ-Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J-k_T8SzBeiK2wWLv_maCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF7A7Jp3u4yT1_r5cMO7QqSydsI0Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12339914</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J-k_T8SzBeiK2wWLv_maCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF7A7Jp3u4yT1_r5cMO7QqSydsI0Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J-k_T8SzBeiK2wWLv_maCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHb9F0l_6vWe53D6NuNJZMQbBdM4A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12339909</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J-k_T8SzBeiK2wWLv_maCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHb9F0l_6vWe53D6NuNJZMQbBdM4A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AL8_T5HWLaeQ2QXO2LywCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHGzxmyEZ60eaYyoEqCJnDTUNSBgA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12327636</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AL8_T5HWLaeQ2QXO2LywCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHGzxmyEZ60eaYyoEqCJnDTUNSBgA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AL8_T5HWLaeQ2QXO2LywCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCjn6HO6F7ctjDXi-8TxdtTDjojA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12327631</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AL8_T5HWLaeQ2QXO2LywCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCjn6HO6F7ctjDXi-8TxdtTDjojA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vZQ_T_64Iafs2QX-qcCfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGwvju2mhbW-0TLT9cp-8olCH-byw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12322024</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vZQ_T_64Iafs2QX-qcCfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGwvju2mhbW-0TLT9cp-8olCH-byw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vZQ_T_64Iafs2QX-qcCfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE7LBvEOaGk-T9gS3e_Pdl4OZuY2Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12322019</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vZQ_T_64Iafs2QX-qcCfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE7LBvEOaGk-T9gS3e_Pdl4OZuY2Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=npE_T5q6DoPg2AXB5MG2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4ACQwvlA9_pFcuPnrImMuustz_g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12321489</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=npE_T5q6DoPg2AXB5MG2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4ACQwvlA9_pFcuPnrImMuustz_g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=npE_T5q6DoPg2AXB5MG2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzm3C0FvUOcaMEODr5zs96HLgPpA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12321484</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=npE_T5q6DoPg2AXB5MG2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzm3C0FvUOcaMEODr5zs96HLgPpA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qmo_T6qfMIO42wW59bWVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEaSF6JBSrQOY1kl_8BMU5w92fU-A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12316934</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qmo_T6qfMIO42wW59bWVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEaSF6JBSrQOY1kl_8BMU5w92fU-A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qmo_T6qfMIO42wW59bWVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNENHoVZSUTRz-9ekP1jeiHxQsYibg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12316930</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qmo_T6qfMIO42wW59bWVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNENHoVZSUTRz-9ekP1jeiHxQsYibg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZEA_T-KzIcW42wWj74WiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZ2bii18usV-iCwDTmDqfMhEaACw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12315732</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZEA_T-KzIcW42wWj74WiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZ2bii18usV-iCwDTmDqfMhEaACw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZEA_T-KzIcW42wWj74WiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH3Wgo4VH68V-RGokwKGc3hRArx3w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12315728</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZEA_T-KzIcW42wWj74WiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH3Wgo4VH68V-RGokwKGc3hRArx3w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eBw_T_mVDLO42QWy7I2oCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF2HUdm9TuhopvuLIP3JJiO-kKwNg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12307378</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eBw_T_mVDLO42QWy7I2oCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF2HUdm9TuhopvuLIP3JJiO-kKwNg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eBw_T_mVDLO42QWy7I2oCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHuvsbsMVcuhN3KVKDJvkgF78VXMw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12307374</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eBw_T_mVDLO42QWy7I2oCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHuvsbsMVcuhN3KVKDJvkgF78VXMw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cuw-T6SqJ-v-2QXlhpyBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmFZm2EmH155qPvqii89EARv67HQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12303600</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cuw-T6SqJ-v-2QXlhpyBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmFZm2EmH155qPvqii89EARv67HQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cuw-T6SqJ-v-2QXlhpyBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEX4ZuZv3M1B13CZFm8ICHGvb_LJw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12303596</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cuw-T6SqJ-v-2QXlhpyBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEX4ZuZv3M1B13CZFm8ICHGvb_LJw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2cE-T_rUEoW42QXF6LmtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEMVaLeQVA08NC4ho6lQCqkUVPWOg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12297801</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2cE-T_rUEoW42QXF6LmtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEMVaLeQVA08NC4ho6lQCqkUVPWOg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2cE-T_rUEoW42QXF6LmtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2zV4D0XJMwtk6mQHUSnECnpYEKQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12297796</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2cE-T_rUEoW42QXF6LmtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2zV4D0XJMwtk6mQHUSnECnpYEKQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rZc-T9zMCcLW2AWWt_WzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGi7xhPz3D0L22bWSU-Ha_ABwrW6A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12290150</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rZc-T9zMCcLW2AWWt_WzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGi7xhPz3D0L22bWSU-Ha_ABwrW6A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rZc-T9zMCcLW2AWWt_WzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG78HC1sf8UIuoLvqzqqDgn66LDmg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12290146</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rZc-T9zMCcLW2AWWt_WzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG78HC1sf8UIuoLvqzqqDgn66LDmg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Fm4-T_rsAeLE2wXh5KipCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEPOsBynonIfdN8gX0WwYoF8jD0qw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12281099</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Fm4-T_rsAeLE2wXh5KipCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEPOsBynonIfdN8gX0WwYoF8jD0qw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Fm4-T_rsAeLE2wXh5KipCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-FY6TOcacVHXEGvJyUVpDXvp2Ow" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12281095</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Fm4-T_rsAeLE2wXh5KipCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-FY6TOcacVHXEGvJyUVpDXvp2Ow&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jUs-T8GNIqPo2AWO7bm4CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzIH4ukeaSU0wAU7AO3U8SwKNrtw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12279298</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jUs-T8GNIqPo2AWO7bm4CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzIH4ukeaSU0wAU7AO3U8SwKNrtw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jUs-T8GNIqPo2AWO7bm4CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhSf52xVBU0GBlP_kn87ebCtNXSA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12279294</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jUs-T8GNIqPo2AWO7bm4CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhSf52xVBU0GBlP_kn87ebCtNXSA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nkM-T5SXE4XI2AX7itDrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHO_aG84hDIkyOJDEGNfAbqSFsLFQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12278803</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nkM-T5SXE4XI2AX7itDrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHO_aG84hDIkyOJDEGNfAbqSFsLFQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nkM-T5SXE4XI2AX7itDrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8AKxyTPxygwLUNx55Wklq7hBI_Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12278799</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nkM-T5SXE4XI2AX7itDrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8AKxyTPxygwLUNx55Wklq7hBI_Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mhk-T6-3G8e62gXvremSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFBYAfXvQhUC2gjHvo1-y1BDNKD-g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12274719</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mhk-T6-3G8e62gXvremSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFBYAfXvQhUC2gjHvo1-y1BDNKD-g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mhk-T6-3G8e62gXvremSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8pNIRyGcRrL5GPNs_8JyYmZhSaw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12274715</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mhk-T6-3G8e62gXvremSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8pNIRyGcRrL5GPNs_8JyYmZhSaw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gu89T7i-NuKW2QXIx7GrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_fGMagYOz2S1S03TXhK4dgCFLlw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12271323</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gu89T7i-NuKW2QXIx7GrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_fGMagYOz2S1S03TXhK4dgCFLlw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gu89T7i-NuKW2QXIx7GrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIliw9c28Vaf2EJCjpESvbTP_-Xw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12271319</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gu89T7i-NuKW2QXIx7GrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIliw9c28Vaf2EJCjpESvbTP_-Xw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0sQ9T8fuBcSG2gXvmcyVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGsHZfLa62_AFZAwb2BkqZpPsLfSw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12261122</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0sQ9T8fuBcSG2gXvmcyVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGsHZfLa62_AFZAwb2BkqZpPsLfSw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0sQ9T8fuBcSG2gXvmcyVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH6BApRInskqQMxkfBxxjrK3jVOdw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12261118</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0sQ9T8fuBcSG2gXvmcyVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH6BApRInskqQMxkfBxxjrK3jVOdw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lZo9T_H1F8TC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxDeEaKUfQzTRNcr6K7g7aOC5g6Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12257495</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lZo9T_H1F8TC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxDeEaKUfQzTRNcr6K7g7aOC5g6Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lZo9T_H1F8TC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3pqCu_luxZwCILvjv-Gvo_ivUmA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12257491</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lZo9T_H1F8TC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3pqCu_luxZwCILvjv-Gvo_ivUmA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uHA9T6-CO-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHCfFywLJ_dGiZQcvk6TftDZEXivA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12253887</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uHA9T6-CO-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHCfFywLJ_dGiZQcvk6TftDZEXivA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uHA9T6-CO-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbn-qLI8nCZouV9rq1Z5DwABhW0A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12253883</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uHA9T6-CO-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbn-qLI8nCZouV9rq1Z5DwABhW0A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NUY9T-DKBdG_2QWMhpGdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmT4XSUwHOJ5-85_rBPNQKTUtSGg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12247414</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NUY9T-DKBdG_2QWMhpGdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmT4XSUwHOJ5-85_rBPNQKTUtSGg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NUY9T-DKBdG_2QWMhpGdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtwUvYj8MrOOv3mqx_FaOAtZRoOg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12247410</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NUY9T-DKBdG_2QWMhpGdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtwUvYj8MrOOv3mqx_FaOAtZRoOg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HRw9T8_tNsnY2QXc_pmsCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNZOaAXP1cf5sdgXIt4bcB73FDHA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12240243</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HRw9T8_tNsnY2QXc_pmsCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNZOaAXP1cf5sdgXIt4bcB73FDHA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HRw9T8_tNsnY2QXc_pmsCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEpWQ1eplaf5oteHFumtWDObKYOUw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12240236</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HRw9T8_tNsnY2QXc_pmsCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEpWQ1eplaf5oteHFumtWDObKYOUw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8PE8T7PEOYjo2gW4vcCBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0W6jaVMi-7Ss2zgO0SysbVsce2g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12236597</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8PE8T7PEOYjo2gW4vcCBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0W6jaVMi-7Ss2zgO0SysbVsce2g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8PE8T7PEOYjo2gW4vcCBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH4C8qnmyDAWIISCFpGAj1b1qx3QQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12236593</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8PE8T7PEOYjo2gW4vcCBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH4C8qnmyDAWIISCFpGAj1b1qx3QQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_PA8T4jeDOSK2wXBo4WtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvosKb8Q47VjvKwha1KB4-qdHdvw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12236435</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_PA8T4jeDOSK2wXBo4WtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvosKb8Q47VjvKwha1KB4-qdHdvw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_PA8T4jeDOSK2wXBo4WtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1BZUaxqSxi7wjvLYNQUM2eRAU7g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12236431</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_PA8T4jeDOSK2wXBo4WtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1BZUaxqSxi7wjvLYNQUM2eRAU7g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zcc8T8-PBvSr2AWJz4GVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFqq1F61L1IJNALXn4tjnB_OLahQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12232050</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zcc8T8-PBvSr2AWJz4GVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFqq1F61L1IJNALXn4tjnB_OLahQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zcc8T8-PBvSr2AWJz4GVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH-e4DSd8d8jo_6FCZ6lBy27NF9aA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12232046</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zcc8T8-PBvSr2AWJz4GVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH-e4DSd8d8jo_6FCZ6lBy27NF9aA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PJ08T7W1Isjq2AXymsD_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEGSzSCySBb8gqIWa3KZBOIs7FrsQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12230815</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PJ08T7W1Isjq2AXymsD_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEGSzSCySBb8gqIWa3KZBOIs7FrsQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PJ08T7W1Isjq2AXymsD_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGCAOg8oawUERwMSbBWv1zKzKvvHQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12230811</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PJ08T7W1Isjq2AXymsD_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGCAOg8oawUERwMSbBWv1zKzKvvHQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXM8T5zqDuTW2AWI2InzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvpCZVaYaIuPThuzqyn2bxlQCmxQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12226103</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXM8T5zqDuTW2AWI2InzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvpCZVaYaIuPThuzqyn2bxlQCmxQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXM8T5zqDuTW2AWI2InzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH53wb9l2TzrUAkg2yRG-qksEhN-Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12226099</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXM8T5zqDuTW2AWI2InzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH53wb9l2TzrUAkg2yRG-qksEhN-Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6Ug8T93nHqOL2AX6pL3zBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhTaPvKFUdCRJi7jeflVU8CoqFDg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12225981</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6Ug8T93nHqOL2AX6pL3zBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhTaPvKFUdCRJi7jeflVU8CoqFDg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vx48T-nFJoLu2gWeibTzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEt0-wG31zERf0FtpHtH7jdOzWH8g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12225845</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vx48T-nFJoLu2gWeibTzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEt0-wG31zERf0FtpHtH7jdOzWH8g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RqA7T5uYFeWZ2QXq2LnzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGrZGYSHrruva_czTUVcnmnwlPSQg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12224869</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RqA7T5uYFeWZ2QXq2LnzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGrZGYSHrruva_czTUVcnmnwlPSQg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XJo7T5jyB8jE2QWRyanzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE5JoUD9uj6xS-laTvFTHtdFeYwmw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12224126</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XJo7T5jyB8jE2QWRyanzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE5JoUD9uj6xS-laTvFTHtdFeYwmw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXY7T_W0G8fWtgeE-YnMCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEz3P9dabqt2la-pIcTql2uDdqzbA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12219871</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXY7T_W0G8fWtgeE-YnMCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEz3P9dabqt2la-pIcTql2uDdqzbA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Es7T5iyBKrO2AXVnejMCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVSbwrxHu5AYTOFUQLrS_j_12OwA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12218626</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Es7T5iyBKrO2AXVnejMCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVSbwrxHu5AYTOFUQLrS_j_12OwA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=viE7T-6_Jabg2QXppPSRCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH919ItbbNFQFFCNO3SfJ2-bJS_bA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12209671</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=viE7T-6_Jabg2QXppPSRCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH919ItbbNFQFFCNO3SfJ2-bJS_bA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ePc6T5jkMqro2QW75Jm_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEhUp3n2ybcvM7XIJL-fo3PPuV9Ug" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12206821</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ePc6T5jkMqro2QW75Jm_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEhUp3n2ybcvM7XIJL-fo3PPuV9Ug&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W806T_qeDYz22AXA-bS5Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHRGspRlaP6dN1T9SIKMmmxvZ-JMw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12202815</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W806T_qeDYz22AXA-bS5Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHRGspRlaP6dN1T9SIKMmmxvZ-JMw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W806T_qeDYz22AXA-bS5Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGMk-u0qHxGcjRyWLLCH2h5b21oXQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12202811</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W806T_qeDYz22AXA-bS5Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGMk-u0qHxGcjRyWLLCH2h5b21oXQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LqM6T4_kLab82gXE9LGjCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGgqrDsB2ly-i0blgo_T-flqlOrPg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12196832</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LqM6T4_kLab82gXE9LGjCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGgqrDsB2ly-i0blgo_T-flqlOrPg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LqM6T4_kLab82gXE9LGjCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiwcnRoFUFKRlUpEF1AKWVJRzRJg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12196825</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LqM6T4_kLab82gXE9LGjCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiwcnRoFUFKRlUpEF1AKWVJRzRJg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-3g6T6bcPOKC2wWmnvDCCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGLljlKHbPV2EvHRgbumxQZqxrISQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12186121</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-3g6T6bcPOKC2wWmnvDCCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGLljlKHbPV2EvHRgbumxQZqxrISQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-3g6T6bcPOKC2wWmnvDCCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFaMBwQSUrt42sg_wvWosCxFNlocA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12186113</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-3g6T6bcPOKC2wWmnvDCCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFaMBwQSUrt42sg_wvWosCxFNlocA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yk46T9f4CcOA2QWo1tSXCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE17hKM0YTo6BZanw8nJGb7kmb-UQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12182311</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yk46T9f4CcOA2QWo1tSXCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE17hKM0YTo6BZanw8nJGb7kmb-UQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yk46T9f4CcOA2QWo1tSXCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNFBffoaIkcs3YEpn0ONrxlwYeEA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12182304</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yk46T9f4CcOA2QWo1tSXCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNFBffoaIkcs3YEpn0ONrxlwYeEA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ikw6T9DoAYb82gWHxPyTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGrfFXtwErZNOOLvjJ0AfTkuWB51Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12182017</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ikw6T9DoAYb82gWHxPyTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGrfFXtwErZNOOLvjJ0AfTkuWB51Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ikw6T9DoAYb82gWHxPyTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGK58xBMjlJpY5e9Th9FOD6XcTCNQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12182012</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ikw6T9DoAYb82gWHxPyTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGK58xBMjlJpY5e9Th9FOD6XcTCNQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aCQ6T63MG8Ho2gX86L2VCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHGH62U_7fHy0G1l1dfjWoo1tnvTA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12177785</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aCQ6T63MG8Ho2gX86L2VCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHGH62U_7fHy0G1l1dfjWoo1tnvTA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aCQ6T63MG8Ho2gX86L2VCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHiwqrNcAI2iwYZRZgS5LUKF275pg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12177780</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aCQ6T63MG8Ho2gX86L2VCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHiwqrNcAI2iwYZRZgS5LUKF275pg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zvo5T7TECabY2gXJlKW_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF3VdLQU7g6m_JvUZv1T1QEvz6tMQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12176691</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zvo5T7TECabY2gXJlKW_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF3VdLQU7g6m_JvUZv1T1QEvz6tMQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zvo5T7TECabY2gXJlKW_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2lIYKnxsPU3bNVUJUgUTJ-0n7UQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12176686</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zvo5T7TECabY2gXJlKW_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2lIYKnxsPU3bNVUJUgUTJ-0n7UQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O9A5T4yPJ-PY2AWX0N2vCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFw8bGzDiQtKouJ9HmdLFbypVVrng" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12172067</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O9A5T4yPJ-PY2AWX0N2vCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFw8bGzDiQtKouJ9HmdLFbypVVrng&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O9A5T4yPJ-PY2AWX0N2vCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFIf5OAmFOGS8Ira1vljWa3xoHY2w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12172062</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O9A5T4yPJ-PY2AWX0N2vCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFIf5OAmFOGS8Ira1vljWa3xoHY2w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_KU5T9HOCM7E2QWay7WbCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUBExc8HLz2be1L3EPGbkYGXYaIg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12169322</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_KU5T9HOCM7E2QWay7WbCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUBExc8HLz2be1L3EPGbkYGXYaIg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_KU5T9HOCM7E2QWay7WbCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_RgN7fziYpazJcOHj-o2c3Vs7EQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12169317</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_KU5T9HOCM7E2QWay7WbCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_RgN7fziYpazJcOHj-o2c3Vs7EQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zns5T6GfGtH-2QXc7ozQDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH-YEBGrNYGVwt-1ndQIwTMj3rJPQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12164737</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zns5T6GfGtH-2QXc7ozQDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH-YEBGrNYGVwt-1ndQIwTMj3rJPQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zns5T6GfGtH-2QXc7ozQDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFt9E4sBVQoQDnzUXt4k41u-VsKyA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12164732</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zns5T6GfGtH-2QXc7ozQDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFt9E4sBVQoQDnzUXt4k41u-VsKyA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rlE5T_yLNIrDsQLI7sCpAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHM4ij5wUt2rPwlKyDOWKhuApQRpw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12158636</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rlE5T_yLNIrDsQLI7sCpAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHM4ij5wUt2rPwlKyDOWKhuApQRpw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rlE5T_yLNIrDsQLI7sCpAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBn1P_ElNIMghIdq9imrr5rRdukQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12158630</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rlE5T_yLNIrDsQLI7sCpAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBn1P_ElNIMghIdq9imrr5rRdukQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GCg5T5e3FLLE2QXaiP2EAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHoX7g-OSU5OVlnuSKKiPXFQi9EA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12147495</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GCg5T5e3FLLE2QXaiP2EAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHoX7g-OSU5OVlnuSKKiPXFQi9EA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GCg5T5e3FLLE2QXaiP2EAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFNCaMQoKr4UymPbmBf9EPtHlmKuw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12147486</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GCg5T5e3FLLE2QXaiP2EAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFNCaMQoKr4UymPbmBf9EPtHlmKuw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tv04T7TnOoLu2gXj-YWZAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGHJo53-mLefEFQl_ezmXqzJe-IZg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12142957</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tv04T7TnOoLu2gXj-YWZAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGHJo53-mLefEFQl_ezmXqzJe-IZg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tv04T7TnOoLu2gXj-YWZAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGPgG0DNdH3m_S2mvWCEBCz3iTIqA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12142950</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tv04T7TnOoLu2gXj-YWZAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGPgG0DNdH3m_S2mvWCEBCz3iTIqA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ffo4T-TzG631sQKD_bH2AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFg7XUGu2-xqDZRENXsHYX5rQpLyg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12142516</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ffo4T-TzG631sQKD_bH2AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFg7XUGu2-xqDZRENXsHYX5rQpLyg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ffo4T-TzG631sQKD_bH2AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGFg6jqIqw855WAQ6bvOTd-KiKArg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12142510</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ffo4T-TzG631sQKD_bH2AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGFg6jqIqw855WAQ6bvOTd-KiKArg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_NI4T_c5ioKwAtaNpYsC&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEOrtpFeW-OY4hGoViAapx6jedUNQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12138118</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_NI4T_c5ioKwAtaNpYsC&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEOrtpFeW-OY4hGoViAapx6jedUNQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_NI4T_c5ioKwAtaNpYsC&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKa63pSuWScTh1j5CDNkIEv0t2yg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12138112</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_NI4T_c5ioKwAtaNpYsC&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKa63pSuWScTh1j5CDNkIEv0t2yg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wKg4T-m8FOqasgKSmMSDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsdKGTQyW-MK8jQ_CooZWuK7sxIQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12137049</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wKg4T-m8FOqasgKSmMSDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsdKGTQyW-MK8jQ_CooZWuK7sxIQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wKg4T-m8FOqasgKSmMSDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-zDwzsPmYHEmiHqWEL8KVEVq3iQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12137044</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wKg4T-m8FOqasgKSmMSDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-zDwzsPmYHEmiHqWEL8KVEVq3iQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lX44T7mOB4qW2gWxz5H5AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEoVaA4HmitIK_972TSTaXfJOIgew" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12129944</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lX44T7mOB4qW2gWxz5H5AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEoVaA4HmitIK_972TSTaXfJOIgew&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lX44T7mOB4qW2gWxz5H5AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDKN8Pbh45xBOF1wYvK9lAzzx1lw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12129938</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lX44T7mOB4qW2gWxz5H5AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDKN8Pbh45xBOF1wYvK9lAzzx1lw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=c1Q4T-_mI-nM2AXPlt2UAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1dLhTseDzkCxNL_O8SBTpxSqH1g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12129820</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=c1Q4T-_mI-nM2AXPlt2UAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1dLhTseDzkCxNL_O8SBTpxSqH1g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Passage of S.1867: Our enemy is within &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=c1Q4T-_mI-nM2AXPlt2UAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_I3t3ojLuO7iiHNjB_4Mda7_8Rw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12129814</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
MAJOR JACKASS ALERT! The Senate voted to pass the anti-American Defense Authorization Act of 2011, S.1867. The vote was 61-37; 61 Senators who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution just flipped the bird at the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://ppjg.me/2011/12/01/5001/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=c1Q4T-_mI-nM2AXPlt2UAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCMQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_I3t3ojLuO7iiHNjB_4Mda7_8Rw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SCo4T9CjCMfK2AWj9aTzAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKD6JWpuAs3WLrY6sosPZXoV8HwQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12129649</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SCo4T9CjCMfK2AWj9aTzAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKD6JWpuAs3WLrY6sosPZXoV8HwQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Jjs0T6TzMqqesQLnooX-AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEjmj5t6khWGf5UHS5h-wEhAnSi1Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12127929</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Jjs0T6TzMqqesQLnooX-AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEjmj5t6khWGf5UHS5h-wEhAnSi1Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uTgzT4qwKKWGsAKJpd2wAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEephaE6pIkD42DKPIYNGtLWcKSXg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12123534</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uTgzT4qwKKWGsAKJpd2wAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEephaE6pIkD42DKPIYNGtLWcKSXg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hg4zT-DMBrSA2QXQ_rTGBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-inLyQ5q5-UURB58bGRH7XXPwrw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12122038</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hg4zT-DMBrSA2QXQ_rTGBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-inLyQ5q5-UURB58bGRH7XXPwrw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuQyT67-F-Xo2AXbm4HLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNES5ISra9W-FslHrVjHnbFxE989Zw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12117292</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuQyT67-F-Xo2AXbm4HLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNES5ISra9W-FslHrVjHnbFxE989Zw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J7oyT9mlFMKK2wWK9bi7Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFjLwYkfTAtd4-zERflO76FRhwhxw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12110357</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J7oyT9mlFMKK2wWK9bi7Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFjLwYkfTAtd4-zERflO76FRhwhxw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=x5AyT8SOB8WzsALO84yxDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEeVHBGptaBuavKuAYrKkN2rkMSOg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12098498</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=x5AyT8SOB8WzsALO84yxDA&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEeVHBGptaBuavKuAYrKkN2rkMSOg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zWUyT4LrA8mpsAKWxPGBBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFY-uV8DpiaWd-P3om3SpFZkCmQ4A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12093817</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zWUyT4LrA8mpsAKWxPGBBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFY-uV8DpiaWd-P3om3SpFZkCmQ4A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m14yT6TbFcyLsAKEoMXrBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEOmCfHVe-Bmv7AMJtfg-lPDqVj0w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12092792</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m14yT6TbFcyLsAKEoMXrBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEOmCfHVe-Bmv7AMJtfg-lPDqVj0w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjsyT6O2NYXY2QXvvLSxBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKdNrSDPjJuPcSKG8CDAepJIBuqg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12088775</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjsyT6O2NYXY2QXvvLSxBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKdNrSDPjJuPcSKG8CDAepJIBuqg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UhEyT5_nJKX9sQKjqeCFBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8ylqwlPQQblhr7VcgNKH86xchLA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12087167</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UhEyT5_nJKX9sQKjqeCFBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8ylqwlPQQblhr7VcgNKH86xchLA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HOcxT5vNOaaIsQKfhpThBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLnpuFEEnk7NF2rFVR1rzmy7beHw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12082961</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HOcxT5vNOaaIsQKfhpThBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLnpuFEEnk7NF2rFVR1rzmy7beHw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A70xT_q7LOmIsgKlhIjnBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJka1h2MpizZ33cXzJkED5pxkaYg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12082798</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A70xT_q7LOmIsgKlhIjnBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEcQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJka1h2MpizZ33cXzJkED5pxkaYg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4ZIxT-_5GZKNsAKT3a2cBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5gmsQnHK1M4EqzIgmw7J0wlSynQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12082582</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4ZIxT-_5GZKNsAKT3a2cBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5gmsQnHK1M4EqzIgmw7J0wlSynQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tj8xT4DkCYetsQLFpMHiBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGrqk5ukXiPrsgd7ilhkTrJXYQhnQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12076285</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tj8xT4DkCYetsQLFpMHiBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGrqk5ukXiPrsgd7ilhkTrJXYQhnQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kCMxT-TeO4SPsQKH7MiPBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGEJC6xZOILAQb3m6OrzioorgTvsw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12076150</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kCMxT-TeO4SPsQKH7MiPBw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGEJC6xZOILAQb3m6OrzioorgTvsw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KxcwT5z1AcjA2gXf5tiKDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqi1DSG5yzb7wqMQ2EAr49rNSjQw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12065705</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KxcwT5z1AcjA2gXf5tiKDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqi1DSG5yzb7wqMQ2EAr49rNSjQw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8uwvT_ylBsSRsALsiN2ADg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhp6LibSU8Ec4NXPvFORDF5Be4Vg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12053968</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8uwvT_ylBsSRsALsiN2ADg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhp6LibSU8Ec4NXPvFORDF5Be4Vg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ucIvT9OLJKSCsgLymPyyDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHn0MIl-jY8S_KrSVnlJrDjJx9UxA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12048827</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ucIvT9OLJKSCsgLymPyyDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHn0MIl-jY8S_KrSVnlJrDjJx9UxA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PLQvT8nMK4arsALLvr2SDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHaWDZY5BIvxDu6BOhZW9TYOMePGw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12046562</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PLQvT8nMK4arsALLvr2SDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHaWDZY5BIvxDu6BOhZW9TYOMePGw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bZgvT8PvOebC2wWuy4ThDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHLCxi29iKpgqmizj8O4p6UpdAvJw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12043026</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bZgvT8PvOebC2wWuy4ThDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHLCxi29iKpgqmizj8O4p6UpdAvJw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Um4vT96RFeWksQKu9ciJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9dYVW6vQAe0sE5NipHaPR1mhosQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12041330</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Um4vT96RFeWksQKu9ciJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9dYVW6vQAe0sE5NipHaPR1mhosQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FkQvT8nqB8OJsgL56cW-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECTJYRecFYLsLg0ZYBV06Oj1zlNA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12038227</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FkQvT8nqB8OJsgL56cW-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECTJYRecFYLsLg0ZYBV06Oj1zlNA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1hkvT6CxE82GsALz-uCdDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHE1__mINd1T_CrRDoayVD3DaBLcw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12038099</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1hkvT6CxE82GsALz-uCdDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHE1__mINd1T_CrRDoayVD3DaBLcw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z-8uT6T5Ja7IsQLuuJWjDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFh4wwoIGY_yGZJrJUnDseAbotjRA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12037968</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z-8uT6T5Ja7IsQLuuJWjDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFh4wwoIGY_yGZJrJUnDseAbotjRA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jMUuT6nkL7Cl2AXO5LnrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG5fhJNDQRkbPQCcGaSC4IBrIo-Wg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12037055</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jMUuT6nkL7Cl2AXO5LnrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG5fhJNDQRkbPQCcGaSC4IBrIo-Wg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=apsuT92DCqfs2QX43Z2ADw&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8nma6mGoLeaHdVK93BorMJ_HWYQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12027169</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=apsuT92DCqfs2QX43Z2ADw&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8nma6mGoLeaHdVK93BorMJ_HWYQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P3EuT7SlBoPnsQLSq92hDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9MFcStl8ITD0L8ddX2gx1ixXMzw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12022369</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P3EuT7SlBoPnsQLSq92hDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9MFcStl8ITD0L8ddX2gx1ixXMzw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gGYuT-DQN-rFsQLDrpXrDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEykwBRlLM-3VCzHnT7N7PsLBcEvQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12021053</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gGYuT-DQN-rFsQLDrpXrDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEykwBRlLM-3VCzHnT7N7PsLBcEvQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=30YuT9aRA6LpsQKnzMD_DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPpsaJJzwsD4ftkKr8gGqWSGkTMg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12017455</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=30YuT9aRA6LpsQKnzMD_DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPpsaJJzwsD4ftkKr8gGqWSGkTMg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rhwuT5PqE5SisQL7-aHFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTXUhMi-LSmB8cz_SGfCTahItMXg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12015744</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rhwuT5PqE5SisQL7-aHFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTXUhMi-LSmB8cz_SGfCTahItMXg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oPItT9isL9H82gXPr63iDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzxQvt2KgB8n3q6wGFT-TxalkErA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12012546</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oPItT9isL9H82gXPr63iDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzxQvt2KgB8n3q6wGFT-TxalkErA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ccgtT-3uBqnA2gX7-P3qDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzg8DCUnWzXk0s4qu4y6nEtTaahg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12011702</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ccgtT-3uBqnA2gX7-P3qDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzg8DCUnWzXk0s4qu4y6nEtTaahg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TJ4tT-HeBsSRsALsiN2ADg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFBb7eLbX2_oSbIyNNqMOAV2iE_iA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12007528</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TJ4tT-HeBsSRsALsiN2ADg&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFBb7eLbX2_oSbIyNNqMOAV2iE_iA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F3QtT9PDF8H22AWUhqWLDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRNSk4jHMiKe4lh7VJqSmQCaBlBQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/12000741</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F3QtT9PDF8H22AWUhqWLDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRNSk4jHMiKe4lh7VJqSmQCaBlBQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=60ktT7bEOYfg2QWh3Y2XDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGRv6RTtHUqHauf6Q5EKdKyFLFWpw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11988882</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=60ktT7bEOYfg2QWh3Y2XDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGRv6RTtHUqHauf6Q5EKdKyFLFWpw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wh8tT4uZNoazsAK0vPSJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_zia1Ou_SMJZP7A0Tb52L8XByyw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11983375</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wh8tT4uZNoazsAK0vPSJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_zia1Ou_SMJZP7A0Tb52L8XByyw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rhctT_y-B6OIsgKM_LGWDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEjtuXYfbUlo5j_2XYeRfTTcbdazA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11982202</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rhctT_y-B6OIsgKM_LGWDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEjtuXYfbUlo5j_2XYeRfTTcbdazA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YvUsT57NMs_5sQLUrcy7Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGo5F8VPW1g8Pq9dDgw90o11JpdUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11978354</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YvUsT57NMs_5sQLUrcy7Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGo5F8VPW1g8Pq9dDgw90o11JpdUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=V8ssT5H0O9HHsQLJm8DBDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrgWQ-rSgoh1xNGKmcKF6MUNO8zA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11976855</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=V8ssT5H0O9HHsQLJm8DBDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrgWQ-rSgoh1xNGKmcKF6MUNO8zA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FKEsT669EPP3sQL_s9WJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHDJjyHBIBAviLqzMauO5IQ5f4iGg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11972743</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FKEsT669EPP3sQL_s9WJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHDJjyHBIBAviLqzMauO5IQ5f4iGg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BXcsT9XfBOzhsQKl3dSoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE-eGOEgDBKjtxIt8fTvWT9eObH2A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11972527</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BXcsT9XfBOzhsQKl3dSoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE-eGOEgDBKjtxIt8fTvWT9eObH2A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v0wsT-K8Aqm62gXivNzrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHJp6hj0rOTwFc7AkfT09kl_IOvoQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11972250</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v0wsT-K8Aqm62gXivNzrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHJp6hj0rOTwFc7AkfT09kl_IOvoQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SfgrT_DJIMnq2wWh6oCfDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsTAWJjbFWqj-gAhU4jCuUijxdwQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11963638</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SfgrT_DJIMnq2wWh6oCfDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsTAWJjbFWqj-gAhU4jCuUijxdwQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MM4rT_GMJYWQsQLc85WlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGkOE_mPtPnSxC2PCNfezY0HyWC2A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11963474</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MM4rT_GMJYWQsQLc85WlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGkOE_mPtPnSxC2PCNfezY0HyWC2A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MCspT_DcOYfq2AXw_f28BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9OB6VUHC6yVnfwqvrPssZ2PVFkA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11943530</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MCspT_DcOYfq2AXw_f28BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9OB6VUHC6yVnfwqvrPssZ2PVFkA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dh4pT6fYDaGGsgLf2-njAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEunt8ZRm4soC_b9te-qfE4I_u_LA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11941749</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dh4pT6fYDaGGsgLf2-njAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEunt8ZRm4soC_b9te-qfE4I_u_LA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8gApT_mBPbSmsQKgzb3nAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG68riuU0pS7vwUg6OJhxj82fBeYg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11938419</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8gApT_mBPbSmsQKgzb3nAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG68riuU0pS7vwUg6OJhxj82fBeYg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=y9YoT_ysMfKGsgLFmsSlAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEcjePr30VB7bI52C2VtkU64wOp6g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11936884</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=y9YoT_ysMfKGsgLFmsSlAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEcjePr30VB7bI52C2VtkU64wOp6g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oqwoT_mXD9K62gWXwMzDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZ4rNMar1cGGPz5i2_gHWiLX_CWg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11932890</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oqwoT_mXD9K62gWXwMzDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZ4rNMar1cGGPz5i2_gHWiLX_CWg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=boIoT7mnHMm_2QXy6um4Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEQ8lFE4shk-kdO3JveO9EoybR8Ug" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11932746</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=boIoT7mnHMm_2QXy6um4Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEQ8lFE4shk-kdO3JveO9EoybR8Ug&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=N1goT-f9CoTC2wWxyYDMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHndI1w9dKuqXghmkIdWIRmMODKnA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11930006</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=N1goT-f9CoTC2wWxyYDMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHndI1w9dKuqXghmkIdWIRmMODKnA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_y0oT7eWFIrCsQKVkfW_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-KX0uHPbqG9cI7BejHp8OeD0WCQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11923131</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_y0oT7eWFIrCsQKVkfW_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-KX0uHPbqG9cI7BejHp8OeD0WCQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3AMoT4F4pKDYBZOPybcC&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvY9g2UEf8Q97iByxBrtBkg_eceA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11910540</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3AMoT4F4pKDYBZOPybcC&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvY9g2UEf8Q97iByxBrtBkg_eceA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m9knT5zJLojo2gXjzaG5Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHBQtcFB56OCMWrXKB5f-S_2XcSsw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11905307</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m9knT5zJLojo2gXjzaG5Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHBQtcFB56OCMWrXKB5f-S_2XcSsw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aMgnT-X9N8uKsAKynY3jAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzpmh4S7YOlpcREdI3DT0Bo6Xwug" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11902550</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aMgnT-X9N8uKsAKynY3jAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzpmh4S7YOlpcREdI3DT0Bo6Xwug&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Wq8nT4GpOY382gWf5Z3fAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEj00I8AxC578iFqZV_QSat7lkSVA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11899384</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Wq8nT4GpOY382gWf5Z3fAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEj00I8AxC578iFqZV_QSat7lkSVA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PoUnT4jVF-OIsQKf2K39Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHAzB8Y9btnmtwodZFATrt0RWUBUw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11897487</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PoUnT4jVF-OIsQKf2K39Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHAzB8Y9btnmtwodZFATrt0RWUBUw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-FonT6WoGMma2gX6zsTCAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE-wnGYPJBb79LM2KCHYZpnfEFGtg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11892999</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-FonT6WoGMma2gX6zsTCAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE-wnGYPJBb79LM2KCHYZpnfEFGtg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xTAnT4iUBeT02wWq3ey_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwPGmRw-ulC8ISMkADvzu9u-xpIA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11892873</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xTAnT4iUBeT02wWq3ey_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CEoQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwPGmRw-ulC8ISMkADvzu9u-xpIA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lQYnT5vhMOf4sQK_gt2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDH0CwotxMC3ta3lP5KLCEx7Hy6w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11892748</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lQYnT5vhMOf4sQK_gt2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDH0CwotxMC3ta3lP5KLCEx7Hy6w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9wmT-XwEuSusAKRs72NAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfRTD4qiM--YGVeBUYgPZos-UXIA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11891001</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9wmT-XwEuSusAKRs72NAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfRTD4qiM--YGVeBUYgPZos-UXIA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ULImT5n7FaiLsgL-mcmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFiCLQNyjfHBwV2QwgxQ6qIpNq0NA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11888260</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ULImT5n7FaiLsgL-mcmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFiCLQNyjfHBwV2QwgxQ6qIpNq0NA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JIgmT_XmEKrJsQLj_aiMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTuzaIosPrXPFYij8-kJnCWv1-xw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11882880</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JIgmT_XmEKrJsQLj_aiMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CE4QmAEwCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTuzaIosPrXPFYij8-kJnCWv1-xw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=at8lT9_3CcO3sQKW-cCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwY6eMAfsSYq8OKflzYEk37S7bdw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11871597</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=at8lT9_3CcO3sQKW-cCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwY6eMAfsSYq8OKflzYEk37S7bdw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MbUlT6XhDMmHsAKntqCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJp_U1WCW96wFPI-4lHwB6l7bUjQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11869260</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MbUlT6XhDMmHsAKntqCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJp_U1WCW96wFPI-4lHwB6l7bUjQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DIslT4u1K-GtsQLvqKCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGCu0L_0jwxsHnu6KxoKsdfrcUGuw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11862161</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DIslT4u1K-GtsQLvqKCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGCu0L_0jwxsHnu6KxoKsdfrcUGuw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WAlT8bkDsuKsAKn8OmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNZIU4rnSdb_npBrMkn61eAKBHCQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11849836</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WAlT8bkDsuKsAKn8OmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNZIU4rnSdb_npBrMkn61eAKBHCQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzYlT8H5DIqvsALLq9GMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_j2cS3DaJPBzO311mhWYRzVpx4Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11844334</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzYlT8H5DIqvsALLq9GMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_j2cS3DaJPBzO311mhWYRzVpx4Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZiUlT_2KN-rCsQLXse2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHnfepWb5rejOKruFkRyXJDJZFVGQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11841771</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZiUlT_2KN-rCsQLXse2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHnfepWb5rejOKruFkRyXJDJZFVGQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WgwlT97EO4OxsALrz4mNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4-oD-EQjvdUH2kL8iXqcRXBBqCw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11838643</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WgwlT97EO4OxsALrz4mNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4-oD-EQjvdUH2kL8iXqcRXBBqCw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuIkT6-6C4yqsALiq5CNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHH5_uGu-w1GzqAw_9KWzkAtORMbw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11836759</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuIkT6-6C4yqsALiq5CNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHH5_uGu-w1GzqAw_9KWzkAtORMbw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F7gkT_PHE4-CsgL25M2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfwZTMSNek-xCr0G0wKQqsXRL7tw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11833273</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F7gkT_PHE4-CsgL25M2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfwZTMSNek-xCr0G0wKQqsXRL7tw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Y0kT7jiGauksQLywOyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFj9L7CY_0l66OJv1Zwu-lJmiExVg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11833136</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Y0kT7jiGauksQLywOyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFj9L7CY_0l66OJv1Zwu-lJmiExVg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vmMkT6SaGe2AsgLFkLmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEUmThiLd12oXcsRurPceUDGgRVTA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11829873</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vmMkT6SaGe2AsgLFkLmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEUmThiLd12oXcsRurPceUDGgRVTA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hjkkT6eTEImJsALS7fGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEWBTuvi7g5y3IjPU5oiEEJW3ybDg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11822977</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hjkkT6eTEImJsALS7fGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEWBTuvi7g5y3IjPU5oiEEJW3ybDg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Xw8kT_yYA6LksQLtkaSMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFakZkM-AZ_1leffHAvF0iGP0l6wg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11810669</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Xw8kT_yYA6LksQLtkaSMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFakZkM-AZ_1leffHAvF0iGP0l6wg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P-UjT_WYK-mxsAKzoa2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE3M7AN40Sc6u6-qOiB0gPFlxTJfg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11805718</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P-UjT_WYK-mxsAKzoa2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE3M7AN40Sc6u6-qOiB0gPFlxTJfg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WdQjT7XWCeSmsQKDtamMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFX_0hXZnNw4Ly_cWKLp3slMfTpmQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11803389</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WdQjT7XWCeSmsQKDtamMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFX_0hXZnNw4Ly_cWKLp3slMfTpmQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3rojT9vTK8Loggf0_MHTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWJh_0XzxZ1yXmHw-f_i70vdH2eg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11800249</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3rojT9vTK8Loggf0_MHTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWJh_0XzxZ1yXmHw-f_i70vdH2eg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xZAjT4HkCYT-ggeoi7nhCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEUaF7ws6sDsf5kXTP2SPXbWxxo8g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11798996</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xZAjT4HkCYT-ggeoi7nhCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEUaF7ws6sDsf5kXTP2SPXbWxxo8g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m2YjT_GdKMT2ggeokLT7CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHxj9taSMqp9wJ993uB26OA8u1Scg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11795248</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m2YjT_GdKMT2ggeokLT7CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHxj9taSMqp9wJ993uB26OA8u1Scg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cTwjT9vTLsX7ggeD5v3bCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcH2gIKlkfrTpqesI9ZPcEkV6rAw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11795117</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cTwjT9vTLsX7ggeD5v3bCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcH2gIKlkfrTpqesI9ZPcEkV6rAw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QhIjT-yVCoaegwfgtIjnCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzeHQBJVnxQ91m1QkRkWWF68IEvg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11791292</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QhIjT-yVCoaegwfgtIjnCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzeHQBJVnxQ91m1QkRkWWF68IEvg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EugiT8H5FsmRsAKGp7yOCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6iRZHBZlKTSajZwEYoxccrS-bXg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11784511</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EugiT8H5FsmRsAKGp7yOCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6iRZHBZlKTSajZwEYoxccrS-bXg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5r0iT8rHDKu_2QX_7IngDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1gVX20K7yBpvqJs2L8JZlPpjCIA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11772575</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5r0iT8rHDKu_2QX_7IngDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1gVX20K7yBpvqJs2L8JZlPpjCIA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ppMiT6nGJceisQLvzfWECQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHUElGprANSEgDGlrc864I4zp6chQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11768058</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ppMiT6nGJceisQLvzfWECQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHUElGprANSEgDGlrc864I4zp6chQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VYMiT52vMMji2QWBi_XeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHYLd8AaBJINY4huIUFzE4f_2uZUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11765485</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VYMiT52vMMji2QWBi_XeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHYLd8AaBJINY4huIUFzE4f_2uZUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WmkiT7b_OejA2gXAhrXgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHT9aQlqyHjiPMWX9QU-IXCEmQqSw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11762339</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WmkiT7b_OejA2gXAhrXgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHT9aQlqyHjiPMWX9QU-IXCEmQqSw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Kz8iT8SaBMPDsQLD8qi1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHot1wRRW39wJ0xsdpUwq220T0HVA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11761015</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Kz8iT8SaBMPDsQLD8qi1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHot1wRRW39wJ0xsdpUwq220T0HVA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DBUiT_KmNMXy2QXqt5XfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEyes3Svlk9e6lBYrb63m4XL-NFtA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11756859</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DBUiT_KmNMXy2QXqt5XfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEyes3Svlk9e6lBYrb63m4XL-NFtA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5OohT965J4Trggf05qT8CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFGvhJC0GLspjXPU73scrirwqI1Qg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11756639</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5OohT965J4Trggf05qT8CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFGvhJC0GLspjXPU73scrirwqI1Qg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vcAhT7fCIc3hsQLU6PG6CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFbPOjNcR312XJ6qBbSqqtnLIg0vw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11752036</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vcAhT7fCIc3hsQLU6PG6CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFbPOjNcR312XJ6qBbSqqtnLIg0vw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jZYhT67gC8WqsQKtqtT_CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPdd-7JMxaOto_TSTOrx9aoH6mmQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11744845</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jZYhT67gC8WqsQKtqtT_CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPdd-7JMxaOto_TSTOrx9aoH6mmQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do Not Be Deceived: S. 1867 is the Most Dangerous Bill Since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WmwhT9HEKMa22gWX9uzxDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGdaW6R4VzbYWHDQ-xulHlqunf7CA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11732900</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alex</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senator Paul argued against the amendment to S. 1867 that McCain co-sponsored by saying, &#8220;Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/30/do-not-be-deceived-s-1867-is-the-most-dangerous-bill-since-the-patriot-act/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WmwhT9HEKMa22gWX9uzxDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEUQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGdaW6R4VzbYWHDQ-xulHlqunf7CA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill since the ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%3A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-30:/commentary/11431581</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.blacklistednews.com/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%3A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ESdXT4PEOOn9sQKPuuHNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHtO4-5u2QLdoGpvhQRbY2vwb1yTA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/13025398</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.blacklistednews.com/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ESdXT4PEOOn9sQKPuuHNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEkQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHtO4-5u2QLdoGpvhQRbY2vwb1yTA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g_tWT5aPAsiF2AW3qbD5Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1OHj2lQbAMZD-CMQ5QXhqfqztHQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/13024017</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.blacklistednews.com/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g_tWT5aPAsiF2AW3qbD5Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1OHj2lQbAMZD-CMQ5QXhqfqztHQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UdFWT9LMIunO2gWp1dDlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHwGh2IvO-W6oJIR-R209U8fTP3CQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/13019295</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.blacklistednews.com/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UdFWT9LMIunO2gWp1dDlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHwGh2IvO-W6oJIR-R209U8fTP3CQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NKdWT92_MpGrsALcxaDJCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF3pxqnjB5FY8xBhJQVN4HOv9K7Yw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/13015584</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.blacklistednews.com/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NKdWT92_MpGrsALcxaDJCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF3pxqnjB5FY8xBhJQVN4HOv9K7Yw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9nxWT47rNoGvsQLKhvjdCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnHqrrDUApMWH2HOyEO9T_2ZKQkw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/13010433</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.blacklistednews.com/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9nxWT47rNoGvsQLKhvjdCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnHqrrDUApMWH2HOyEO9T_2ZKQkw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z1JWT-HGK8XMsQLv0pjSCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8PSsTikVs9rQDlEYoND3CsLRhMA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/13004015</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.blacklistednews.com/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z1JWT-HGK8XMsQLv0pjSCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8PSsTikVs9rQDlEYoND3CsLRhMA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mylWT47hFoyqsAK409nPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH4LSghFyndH6zdRCLY3LDWn5MeXA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12993257</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.blacklistednews.com/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mylWT47hFoyqsAK409nPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH4LSghFyndH6zdRCLY3LDWn5MeXA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yhFWT7TKOKetsQKF7bnpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmxrLd2Ntzf7EqpnISMtr6Ip0BQQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12990482</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.blacklistednews.com/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yhFWT7TKOKetsQKF7bnpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmxrLd2Ntzf7EqpnISMtr6Ip0BQQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=j_5VT_eOGsavsAK886jpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHcZ_8vMKiA-K-RZT3v7xVC8GKW9A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12988611</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.blacklistednews.com/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=j_5VT_eOGsavsAK886jpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHcZ_8vMKiA-K-RZT3v7xVC8GKW9A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g9RVT-DaELL_sQLC-ZXjCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEWZ5eso581xJmZMe-EZxZXg4HJ4w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12985212</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.blacklistednews.com/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g9RVT-DaELL_sQLC-ZXjCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEsQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEWZ5eso581xJmZMe-EZxZXg4HJ4w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VC5UT4v1IKT_sQKk8tyKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEd01fQw_xqUr9eGb_Ku4tHP13mFQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12942041</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.blacklistednews.com/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VC5UT4v1IKT_sQKk8tyKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEd01fQw_xqUr9eGb_Ku4tHP13mFQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JwRUT4vWA-P2sQLU-oTwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrn66dpZ2OBx_z7P45Md-3QxOpkA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12938633</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.blacklistednews.com/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JwRUT4vWA-P2sQLU-oTwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrn66dpZ2OBx_z7P45Md-3QxOpkA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9tlTT5-EO-HIsQKdhZHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEv1enwoE0YbvP1wBtQeEBZafJfpg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12933554</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.blacklistednews.com/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9tlTT5-EO-HIsQKdhZHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEv1enwoE0YbvP1wBtQeEBZafJfpg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do not be deceived: S. 1867 is the most dangerous bill since the ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=069TT865DorgsQKw8oHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHaPEpxWA0brLsgmjVFgSYdo2sT1A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12927484</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.blacklistednews.com/</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill was replaced by the one introduced on the 15th of November, S. 1867. Today Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Senator John McCain of Arizona faced off on the floor of the Senate over a proposed amendment to S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.blacklistednews.com/Do_not_be_deceived%253A_S._1867_is_the_most_dangerous_bill_since_the_PATRIOT_Act/16816/0/38/38/Y/M.html&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=069TT865DorgsQKw8oHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CE8QmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHaPEpxWA0brLsgmjVFgSYdo2sT1A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wk1JT7TtCcXMsQKsu_HqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1VIdIiNNLUu-jVRPbD3lKrMXEvw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12615323</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wk1JT7TtCcXMsQKsu_HqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1VIdIiNNLUu-jVRPbD3lKrMXEvw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kyNJT5_DDYH5sQKfn_jzCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHug8elFClbP4_AKRDCJgqLFuzXrw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12608488</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kyNJT5_DDYH5sQKfn_jzCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEgQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHug8elFClbP4_AKRDCJgqLFuzXrw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zflIT5_ILoT_sQLRyKHzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVQBZUbJWQJuGJCFW0NlYjUictIA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12596599</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zflIT5_ILoT_sQLRyKHzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVQBZUbJWQJuGJCFW0NlYjUictIA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KNZIT4LQN430sQKiv5TrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFjAoKL1RuS_D8UgqFWevfcSR72Aw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12592440</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KNZIT4LQN430sQKiv5TrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFjAoKL1RuS_D8UgqFWevfcSR72Aw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OM9IT6L0HKyAsgKK-_DqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHK6foGwEuTSYSnP0lqnGcq83Xxxg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12591501</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OM9IT6L0HKyAsgKK-_DqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEMQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHK6foGwEuTSYSnP0lqnGcq83Xxxg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=k6VIT6mAApKNsALpx6zmCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEQJPHt2xMUjIxAFpXsgeD1Vjxz6Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12587661</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=k6VIT6mAApKNsALpx6zmCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEQJPHt2xMUjIxAFpXsgeD1Vjxz6Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=33pIT4bGAuL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFUBFihjuJXoZ4gWWemewi9g2q_Ng" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12586310</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=33pIT4bGAuL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFUBFihjuJXoZ4gWWemewi9g2q_Ng&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVBIT_KvOYaFsALAwPjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXJE5VnvAt0M2BixneGSJPGm6dYQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12582535</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVBIT_KvOYaFsALAwPjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXJE5VnvAt0M2BixneGSJPGm6dYQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eSZIT7XQJMWGsgKs04jrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHtk4Z9jN3E94EUOuF44hxVQueayg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12580444</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eSZIT7XQJMWGsgKs04jrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHtk4Z9jN3E94EUOuF44hxVQueayg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WfxHT7SSLunKsQLtobWdBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEw45HdqKaDAnNIQ_a5KNAslYZjrg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12575474</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WfxHT7SSLunKsQLtobWdBA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEw45HdqKaDAnNIQ_a5KNAslYZjrg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M9JHT6j2C-fnsQKEpOnqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGO3oCL4BzyhzZxoPH0M5mOhiH5lg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12569218</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M9JHT6j2C-fnsQKEpOnqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGO3oCL4BzyhzZxoPH0M5mOhiH5lg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=46hHT5aVMPPMsQLGuPDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbVV-Y55pvZxLSVpLdmdpyxBlwoQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12557656</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=46hHT5aVMPPMsQLGuPDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbVV-Y55pvZxLSVpLdmdpyxBlwoQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6oFHT7GXKc6ztwec4dSfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPO20eZJW9wLHeB-TCzgqjbw1VeA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12552993</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6oFHT7GXKc6ztwec4dSfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPO20eZJW9wLHeB-TCzgqjbw1VeA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wH1HT66iMMe9gAfKnrmmDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGbive3fScqhiUABsb5_zvyMvb7WA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12552440</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wH1HT66iMMe9gAfKnrmmDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGbive3fScqhiUABsb5_zvyMvb7WA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01NHT7uBNfLFsQLXwtjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGLSFmOIXIv3beStE0kQKXfwk7kTg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12548181</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01NHT7uBNfLFsQLXwtjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGLSFmOIXIv3beStE0kQKXfwk7kTg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QylHT83TLYaosQLipenqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEHWgzd9dNk8UZxRCS5ENnj7RbYEQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12546781</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QylHT83TLYaosQLipenqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEHWgzd9dNk8UZxRCS5ENnj7RbYEQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mf9GT7-HG8qwsAK3ndzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFkSOlJuiIe-KzULHqxNqRy8dWtkg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12543048</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mf9GT7-HG8qwsAK3ndzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFkSOlJuiIe-KzULHqxNqRy8dWtkg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EtVGT_2-B6WlsALDosXqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzJa2kRKLWrM_BM8hLYKvNNKoXZw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12540973</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EtVGT_2-B6WlsALDosXqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzJa2kRKLWrM_BM8hLYKvNNKoXZw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=36pGT-uANommgweI0sGlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFF8jtWPEJbxcGlQR9prragSmlRZA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12535913</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=36pGT-uANommgweI0sGlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFF8jtWPEJbxcGlQR9prragSmlRZA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p4BGT-KWGdH0ggfbv8iLDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF8iPOp-uYolRr-t_1x1GsOPpYW9w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12529072</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p4BGT-KWGdH0ggfbv8iLDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF8iPOp-uYolRr-t_1x1GsOPpYW9w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7FZGT9DSAoW0gwehk6nvDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhoBVHyThXaaLQ3tW5NyRSf6cxeg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12517419</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7FZGT9DSAoW0gwehk6nvDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhoBVHyThXaaLQ3tW5NyRSf6cxeg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fjFGT7W-D46HsALjiJD1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEOKd0nHG--2MiIEeMZLaTMsCClgg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12513741</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fjFGT7W-D46HsALjiJD1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEOKd0nHG--2MiIEeMZLaTMsCClgg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PSxGT6CNC9OmsAKz0YjODg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEdvx9UDnMvR_DOrLkl4EqHRDWBJA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12513008</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PSxGT6CNC9OmsAKz0YjODg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEdvx9UDnMvR_DOrLkl4EqHRDWBJA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dwJGT_-lBsWrsQL1lIXlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVyN1Gr7EX3lTWukS_z4h57XjFCQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12508998</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dwJGT_-lBsWrsQL1lIXlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVyN1Gr7EX3lTWukS_z4h57XjFCQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4tdFT4j5OuqEsAKAuLXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGbWlPOGYpnecQVS9wEAklaB8USaw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12507679</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4tdFT4j5OuqEsAKAuLXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGbWlPOGYpnecQVS9wEAklaB8USaw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=t61FT7fcL9TfsQK425TEDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwTgZoSWXchXBDDFceUr5hYgYNSg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12503988</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=t61FT7fcL9TfsQK425TEDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwTgZoSWXchXBDDFceUr5hYgYNSg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dINFT97IFqbEsQL96v3DDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQTKBzoDHnBVkKIh9rKMTiadHzHQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12501707</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dINFT97IFqbEsQL96v3DDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQTKBzoDHnBVkKIh9rKMTiadHzHQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RFlFT8LaBeiCsALv66DDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqxVHStLawo2ra9v5QYe9gGlxpSw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12496715</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RFlFT8LaBeiCsALv66DDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqxVHStLawo2ra9v5QYe9gGlxpSw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gy9FT7zyCqOJsQKghfTCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFxpDlbeCZr9JsFJb4yGniloqvXXg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12490787</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gy9FT7zyCqOJsQKghfTCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFxpDlbeCZr9JsFJb4yGniloqvXXg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lAVFT6qEJ8SusQLN1YTDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG90l3--wCNCVk2rtLtgOvIPHGUzg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12479285</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lAVFT6qEJ8SusQLN1YTDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG90l3--wCNCVk2rtLtgOvIPHGUzg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ueJET_aOJ8X0sQLKn8zCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF3HR6gnSMQl8Xo_eZ0kes4Mmm2hQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12474774</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ueJET_aOJ8X0sQLKn8zCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF3HR6gnSMQl8Xo_eZ0kes4Mmm2hQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tNpET4jiGIuGsgKUtZzDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQaqq7enXlwTPv1LX91WEeGz_ENA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12473725</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tNpET4jiGIuGsgKUtZzDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQaqq7enXlwTPv1LX91WEeGz_ENA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6LBET_mqIejlsQKnts3CDw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHIkfL1mYt9eRTXNrJ_Wv5NATqk_A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12470054</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6LBET_mqIejlsQKnts3CDw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHIkfL1mYt9eRTXNrJ_Wv5NATqk_A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QIZET5PBGuHksQLx6IHDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGSjzMUNsQr58RNk_YlWSW1YJZgPQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12468817</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QIZET5PBGuHksQLx6IHDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGSjzMUNsQr58RNk_YlWSW1YJZgPQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OlxET6L6KtOlsALUsIXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE3f73kKvFs9sDqmYyryfAXzfpRiw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12465179</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OlxET6L6KtOlsALUsIXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE3f73kKvFs9sDqmYyryfAXzfpRiw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8DFET4y4FI6GsgLUuYDDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-aXR5Mmc73msU5IrBbxTahaz1HA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12464404</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8DFET4y4FI6GsgLUuYDDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-aXR5Mmc73msU5IrBbxTahaz1HA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2wdET8f5Mabe2AXI1qWZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYEhqVFHSThPkM9VE2xVj5JbwHVQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12460135</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2wdET8f5Mabe2AXI1qWZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYEhqVFHSThPkM9VE2xVj5JbwHVQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m91DT93DBMno2AXU-qHSBA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFpQsgSF4NAeZpNii-eOzlit2js7A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12453559</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m91DT93DBMno2AXU-qHSBA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFpQsgSF4NAeZpNii-eOzlit2js7A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QbRDT53oBY_vggeskbCGCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZKTJ7hDES6802R-WSPkh5tyS1bQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12441752</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QbRDT53oBY_vggeskbCGCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZKTJ7hDES6802R-WSPkh5tyS1bQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UolDT4mBE8a2gwf-nO2FDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfEx0VQy60wlaqVzw8oJlbEtXQgw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12436396</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UolDT4mBE8a2gwf-nO2FDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfEx0VQy60wlaqVzw8oJlbEtXQgw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pIdDT7yiJoPoggf4yNGYCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGlxMqb4_dckWwfxCT2Huyw7v3LDw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12436126</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pIdDT7yiJoPoggf4yNGYCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGlxMqb4_dckWwfxCT2Huyw7v3LDw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EF9DT8HRDeea2AWW6dSTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHN3RI3vkJgQXQ4OhEyb1MERZqa1w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12431479</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EF9DT8HRDeea2AWW6dSTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHN3RI3vkJgQXQ4OhEyb1MERZqa1w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2DRDT6X6IISy2QWwsLSiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE-qKgYz_bpRMyqqcKzP5FWMQXdrQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12430316</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2DRDT6X6IISy2QWwsLSiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE-qKgYz_bpRMyqqcKzP5FWMQXdrQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8QpDT_LsMaTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEOCXV6vdHkzsWxzQR8ZUGQiCgtww" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12426985</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8QpDT_LsMaTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDYQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEOCXV6vdHkzsWxzQR8ZUGQiCgtww&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r-BCT6X1C4iI2gW4p6GvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzwtnJgYQTM-V7IdQM5r1nnxE-ew" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12426532</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r-BCT6X1C4iI2gW4p6GvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzwtnJgYQTM-V7IdQM5r1nnxE-ew&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W7ZCT_i8HsTC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhgzAvgHiC6zvBkUEmdQSWniDb7Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12422650</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W7ZCT_i8HsTC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhgzAvgHiC6zvBkUEmdQSWniDb7Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JYxCT_fGJMbg2AXO66ymCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGb0-w6f1nfEWthflWw91QUOlwV6A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12416223</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JYxCT_fGJMbg2AXO66ymCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGb0-w6f1nfEWthflWw91QUOlwV6A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UWJCT-zXOqW62gXGpZS0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEPA9Eo-i9BoHTuo5lRmgWjDcwzog" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12404238</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UWJCT-zXOqW62gXGpZS0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEPA9Eo-i9BoHTuo5lRmgWjDcwzog&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzdCT_vlOeKC2wXYmcWvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGK9rMsXJp-F-tIZIJjjf8pVx-Gtg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12398580</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzdCT_vlOeKC2wXYmcWvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGK9rMsXJp-F-tIZIJjjf8pVx-Gtg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xDNCT7ilLofU2AW6oKjCCw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1cmedDOGHLCmQNPbsR0H5CS8-cA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12397946</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xDNCT7ilLofU2AW6oKjCCw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1cmedDOGHLCmQNPbsR0H5CS8-cA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gQ1CT5WDHqTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEEP0_DFTG8uupKdUIah2Jag47ctw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12393496</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gQ1CT5WDHqTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEEP0_DFTG8uupKdUIah2Jag47ctw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R-NBT-igL4XY2QXS7JSDCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGPZEhqnW9FwbIaCuA85QdFZ8mjsw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12392266</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R-NBT-igL4XY2QXS7JSDCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGPZEhqnW9FwbIaCuA85QdFZ8mjsw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R7lBT4udNcr02QWD2OGZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvU528kJAIVoYMWKNmEiJ6QlnQQQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12389162</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R7lBT4udNcr02QWD2OGZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvU528kJAIVoYMWKNmEiJ6QlnQQQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GY9BT-ylPOOQ2QWH_YykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvhHunL9z90gKsHrqFr8XEUPrLGA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12389057</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GY9BT-ylPOOQ2QWH_YykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvhHunL9z90gKsHrqFr8XEUPrLGA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5mRBT6bBCKLM2AX_x9H_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoad3hE6ok3i1y_Ndj4DGfo_81zw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12385082</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5mRBT6bBCKLM2AX_x9H_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHoad3hE6ok3i1y_Ndj4DGfo_81zw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vDpBT-zzH-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvTKYA4uG9rR5V0VzOIxxLIx0LMg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12378625</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vDpBT-zzH-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvTKYA4uG9rR5V0VzOIxxLIx0LMg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jhBBT7KhDujo2gWLo92kCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwwpCj-wbSm7HrWtlv8VJXVpSORA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12366548</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jhBBT7KhDujo2gWLo92kCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwwpCj-wbSm7HrWtlv8VJXVpSORA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XeZAT-DqF4ni2AW7htydCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPAdwQjBIdQrjNOj7bEyRbgOTF4w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12360836</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XeZAT-DqF4ni2AW7htydCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPAdwQjBIdQrjNOj7bEyRbgOTF4w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=peFAT7vED-bc2QWz09moDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGf34OHpFrQyqLWC0nPoYI8cTO9Xg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12360105</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=peFAT7vED-bc2QWz09moDw&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGf34OHpFrQyqLWC0nPoYI8cTO9Xg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-LtAT7u1EqWe2AWK2KybCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXL4rNras9ioWovRy_1t7TwxvkYw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12355618</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-LtAT7u1EqWe2AWK2KybCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXL4rNras9ioWovRy_1t7TwxvkYw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0JFAT66vJMv-2QWH1IGICA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEqkPmcHlgLRp_BbuaNBUZ6WjEyFw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12354345</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0JFAT66vJMv-2QWH1IGICA&amp;amp;ved=0CEEQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEqkPmcHlgLRp_BbuaNBUZ6WjEyFw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=52dAT8OWNbPE2QWxwKyfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVjyfv9vbMa23DH1CuANLkj1Uclw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12350944</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=52dAT8OWNbPE2QWxwKyfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVjyfv9vbMa23DH1CuANLkj1Uclw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oz1AT6LMFsLy2QXPpK2DCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzGqBUHbidjmwXYzGTaOrlsRWeqw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12350819</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oz1AT6LMFsLy2QXPpK2DCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEYQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzGqBUHbidjmwXYzGTaOrlsRWeqw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XRNAT8ToJsOg2gXrs_mPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH71-M4Y5tyyob4CCGyd2MVGunxNw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12346807</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XRNAT8ToJsOg2gXrs_mPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CEIQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH71-M4Y5tyyob4CCGyd2MVGunxNw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J-k_T8SzBeiK2wWLv_maCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGX399EBBevl5YoDF7QzlaeIMZhSA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12339912</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J-k_T8SzBeiK2wWLv_maCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGX399EBBevl5YoDF7QzlaeIMZhSA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AL8_T5HWLaeQ2QXO2LywCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9i7YwQuGf9ZAQkc8b2_LDNMsbIQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12327634</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AL8_T5HWLaeQ2QXO2LywCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9i7YwQuGf9ZAQkc8b2_LDNMsbIQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vZQ_T_64Iafs2QX-qcCfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGsTwXQx3kbYo6iRmcY7kN05f20vw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12322022</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vZQ_T_64Iafs2QX-qcCfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGsTwXQx3kbYo6iRmcY7kN05f20vw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=npE_T5q6DoPg2AXB5MG2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQZ0pxO5SqAuXKySpdJvUA49spJQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12321487</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=npE_T5q6DoPg2AXB5MG2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQZ0pxO5SqAuXKySpdJvUA49spJQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qmo_T6qfMIO42wW59bWVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVCQ1WSGBSQirTlpRBzg5tgCUdqw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12316932</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qmo_T6qfMIO42wW59bWVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVCQ1WSGBSQirTlpRBzg5tgCUdqw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZEA_T-KzIcW42wWj74WiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8a1YSvDHdSpkhZx2bfEc_b68nRQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12315730</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZEA_T-KzIcW42wWj74WiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8a1YSvDHdSpkhZx2bfEc_b68nRQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eBw_T_mVDLO42QWy7I2oCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELr-LxSDRAXw0R-TXfTYuLzX6hbw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12307376</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eBw_T_mVDLO42QWy7I2oCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELr-LxSDRAXw0R-TXfTYuLzX6hbw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cuw-T6SqJ-v-2QXlhpyBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHM7YXZ_8Zdq-a2u-KyheJouw1kHw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12303598</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cuw-T6SqJ-v-2QXlhpyBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHM7YXZ_8Zdq-a2u-KyheJouw1kHw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2cE-T_rUEoW42QXF6LmtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFq4kqXA2xLiw1xYzgmgX5-e0XOFg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12297799</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2cE-T_rUEoW42QXF6LmtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFq4kqXA2xLiw1xYzgmgX5-e0XOFg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rZc-T9zMCcLW2AWWt_WzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzjjvwlqVMsBLUpTj0rY-OATD6GQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12290148</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rZc-T9zMCcLW2AWWt_WzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzjjvwlqVMsBLUpTj0rY-OATD6GQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Fm4-T_rsAeLE2wXh5KipCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4Q2EtE36XGJguGWeyLFzmlbpTfQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12281097</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Fm4-T_rsAeLE2wXh5KipCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4Q2EtE36XGJguGWeyLFzmlbpTfQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jUs-T8GNIqPo2AWO7bm4CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEB_1anDUvL2gSpl9dhLZM9-ME9jg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12279296</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jUs-T8GNIqPo2AWO7bm4CA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEB_1anDUvL2gSpl9dhLZM9-ME9jg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nkM-T5SXE4XI2AX7itDrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-aJDVV-1Z8tLb2n8Zvxw-E_Tt0w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12278801</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nkM-T5SXE4XI2AX7itDrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-aJDVV-1Z8tLb2n8Zvxw-E_Tt0w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mhk-T6-3G8e62gXvremSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKtlC0a8Z8sOVRfmICg2luqnx9ug" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12274717</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mhk-T6-3G8e62gXvremSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKtlC0a8Z8sOVRfmICg2luqnx9ug&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gu89T7i-NuKW2QXIx7GrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHcVrtv7Fj5j_hLN5jOiu_3dVOFCQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12271321</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gu89T7i-NuKW2QXIx7GrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHcVrtv7Fj5j_hLN5jOiu_3dVOFCQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0sQ9T8fuBcSG2gXvmcyVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHlEJz2_pLKPTrChv2NFgEEF7d4Tw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12261120</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0sQ9T8fuBcSG2gXvmcyVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHlEJz2_pLKPTrChv2NFgEEF7d4Tw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lZo9T_H1F8TC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGTsVtFkEEsOrCrBgi2RTvlC39G0Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12257493</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lZo9T_H1F8TC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGTsVtFkEEsOrCrBgi2RTvlC39G0Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uHA9T6-CO-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGgDbFG0fdiQ2LG8DLGTi3yOcrPGw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12253885</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uHA9T6-CO-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGgDbFG0fdiQ2LG8DLGTi3yOcrPGw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NUY9T-DKBdG_2QWMhpGdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFO_AfCz-0CkUMfl43UDrET9OZWA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12247412</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NUY9T-DKBdG_2QWMhpGdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFO_AfCz-0CkUMfl43UDrET9OZWA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HRw9T8_tNsnY2QXc_pmsCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHdOskdAWjc8ACZkHOBHeuOY-_54g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12240240</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HRw9T8_tNsnY2QXc_pmsCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHdOskdAWjc8ACZkHOBHeuOY-_54g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8PE8T7PEOYjo2gW4vcCBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFSgS_DpnK-6z1M8n5CCkWdFqQpkw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12236595</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8PE8T7PEOYjo2gW4vcCBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFSgS_DpnK-6z1M8n5CCkWdFqQpkw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_PA8T4jeDOSK2wXBo4WtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQwPTV8xt-o6acZN4UznlxvnD2-w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12236433</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_PA8T4jeDOSK2wXBo4WtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQwPTV8xt-o6acZN4UznlxvnD2-w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zcc8T8-PBvSr2AWJz4GVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXYq-RdTc5OdLXEUoOn3dZ6oPd0w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12232048</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zcc8T8-PBvSr2AWJz4GVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXYq-RdTc5OdLXEUoOn3dZ6oPd0w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PJ08T7W1Isjq2AXymsD_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHR6Adu1Nm5OL7EJ--0S5ssaNYLUw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12230813</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PJ08T7W1Isjq2AXymsD_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHR6Adu1Nm5OL7EJ--0S5ssaNYLUw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXM8T5zqDuTW2AWI2InzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4ZXQjVCrhbLOG6_7QmfzXg05uuQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12226101</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXM8T5zqDuTW2AWI2InzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4ZXQjVCrhbLOG6_7QmfzXg05uuQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6Ug8T93nHqOL2AX6pL3zBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9Aj-Nni4GcUWQ1j-uAL8_uIpqFg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12225983</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6Ug8T93nHqOL2AX6pL3zBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9Aj-Nni4GcUWQ1j-uAL8_uIpqFg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vx48T-nFJoLu2gWeibTzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF3GelxgQqOcPWFyAZ6fdfnInX1tA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12225847</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vx48T-nFJoLu2gWeibTzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF3GelxgQqOcPWFyAZ6fdfnInX1tA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RqA7T5uYFeWZ2QXq2LnzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGELpl1aYvsCQwbx9ip_D7h15IsFg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12224871</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RqA7T5uYFeWZ2QXq2LnzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGELpl1aYvsCQwbx9ip_D7h15IsFg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XJo7T5jyB8jE2QWRyanzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7QEF6ATiEP_mwYzWfL9xTlSzo2Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12224128</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XJo7T5jyB8jE2QWRyanzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7QEF6ATiEP_mwYzWfL9xTlSzo2Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXY7T_W0G8fWtgeE-YnMCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHJ4a7GxubAnzrD9BeJ6-IfAk-iFA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12219873</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXY7T_W0G8fWtgeE-YnMCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHJ4a7GxubAnzrD9BeJ6-IfAk-iFA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Es7T5iyBKrO2AXVnejMCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZD98lb8iv_zERayW4_pYWW1LptA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12218628</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Es7T5iyBKrO2AXVnejMCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZD98lb8iv_zERayW4_pYWW1LptA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=viE7T-6_Jabg2QXppPSRCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDyey-E0VPSdfdV3oCzaSYG43BAA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12209673</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=viE7T-6_Jabg2QXppPSRCg&amp;amp;ved=0CEAQmAEwCA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDyey-E0VPSdfdV3oCzaSYG43BAA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ePc6T5jkMqro2QW75Jm_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFaWqNGd3W4HENLzwfpf51BbJABYQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12206823</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ePc6T5jkMqro2QW75Jm_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFaWqNGd3W4HENLzwfpf51BbJABYQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W806T_qeDYz22AXA-bS5Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHl_hbYcp_eXuxfhmb257rsGKsT5g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12202813</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W806T_qeDYz22AXA-bS5Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHl_hbYcp_eXuxfhmb257rsGKsT5g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LqM6T4_kLab82gXE9LGjCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGDfWSwSsg-bQr0g2cAxU4G4wcMCA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12196830</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LqM6T4_kLab82gXE9LGjCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGDfWSwSsg-bQr0g2cAxU4G4wcMCA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-3g6T6bcPOKC2wWmnvDCCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHCpQ0G0xzOCmP-HjiiFeafDFDk7w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12186119</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-3g6T6bcPOKC2wWmnvDCCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHCpQ0G0xzOCmP-HjiiFeafDFDk7w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yk46T9f4CcOA2QWo1tSXCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXcjXACaCS_Z9r3HFBdD1kf1gGng" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12182309</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yk46T9f4CcOA2QWo1tSXCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXcjXACaCS_Z9r3HFBdD1kf1gGng&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ikw6T9DoAYb82gWHxPyTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvJiE57Bzi7J5cZL0MdVBSj_sWGQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12182015</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ikw6T9DoAYb82gWHxPyTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvJiE57Bzi7J5cZL0MdVBSj_sWGQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aCQ6T63MG8Ho2gX86L2VCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1WWkbc6t6ttN_bP4LTOfol1_p9Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12177783</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aCQ6T63MG8Ho2gX86L2VCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1WWkbc6t6ttN_bP4LTOfol1_p9Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zvo5T7TECabY2gXJlKW_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERMDJeDxTtNCuGVad4-748RdJxfw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12176689</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zvo5T7TECabY2gXJlKW_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERMDJeDxTtNCuGVad4-748RdJxfw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O9A5T4yPJ-PY2AWX0N2vCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9QC4KIIDWeGfKEwgksfwLWUcrFA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12172065</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O9A5T4yPJ-PY2AWX0N2vCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9QC4KIIDWeGfKEwgksfwLWUcrFA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_KU5T9HOCM7E2QWay7WbCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjB0v0BWSyQtFsGc8efonNb0hTKw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12169320</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_KU5T9HOCM7E2QWay7WbCg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjB0v0BWSyQtFsGc8efonNb0hTKw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zns5T6GfGtH-2QXc7ozQDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEebjhk3r4PwCNgOdEd7gSpYfaWOg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12164735</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zns5T6GfGtH-2QXc7ozQDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEebjhk3r4PwCNgOdEd7gSpYfaWOg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rlE5T_yLNIrDsQLI7sCpAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHnmBP6MizCgSPJBSAYdiHN9fZmVw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12158633</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rlE5T_yLNIrDsQLI7sCpAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHnmBP6MizCgSPJBSAYdiHN9fZmVw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GCg5T5e3FLLE2QXaiP2EAg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNB5_TFUs9wQi0cYN4TFiDDhL25w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12147491</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GCg5T5e3FLLE2QXaiP2EAg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNB5_TFUs9wQi0cYN4TFiDDhL25w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tv04T7TnOoLu2gXj-YWZAg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKnCEBcADREVkvRU43pk_YwVAfWA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12142955</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tv04T7TnOoLu2gXj-YWZAg&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKnCEBcADREVkvRU43pk_YwVAfWA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ffo4T-TzG631sQKD_bH2AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzBXAdFZVHZi_KgMLBodd7p0Tm9A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12142514</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ffo4T-TzG631sQKD_bH2AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzBXAdFZVHZi_KgMLBodd7p0Tm9A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_NI4T_c5ioKwAtaNpYsC&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERUX0gal5Qnb5eTFpfX65bY13gTw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12138116</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_NI4T_c5ioKwAtaNpYsC&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERUX0gal5Qnb5eTFpfX65bY13gTw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wKg4T-m8FOqasgKSmMSDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE34BZHUVJeaN9I0LBiHaITkvEO0Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12137047</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wKg4T-m8FOqasgKSmMSDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE34BZHUVJeaN9I0LBiHaITkvEO0Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lX44T7mOB4qW2gWxz5H5AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGi1A7OMk4OomByzY2v8FEwbr0nUg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12129942</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lX44T7mOB4qW2gWxz5H5AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CD0QmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGi1A7OMk4OomByzY2v8FEwbr0nUg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=c1Q4T-_mI-nM2AXPlt2UAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHcpGIttkxxMNloedw6nGhCD1zdSw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12129817</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=c1Q4T-_mI-nM2AXPlt2UAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHcpGIttkxxMNloedw6nGhCD1zdSw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SCo4T9CjCMfK2AWj9aTzAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUOdv4LxwZO7pNfA7yYexA5jOqpA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12129646</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SCo4T9CjCMfK2AWj9aTzAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUOdv4LxwZO7pNfA7yYexA5jOqpA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Jjs0T6TzMqqesQLnooX-AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGya1iO1jC08nOPrZJn-9lVIQeiiQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12127926</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Jjs0T6TzMqqesQLnooX-AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGya1iO1jC08nOPrZJn-9lVIQeiiQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uTgzT4qwKKWGsAKJpd2wAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxm37AFLPYSt4MeNq4Y_ETxAMHTQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12123531</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uTgzT4qwKKWGsAKJpd2wAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxm37AFLPYSt4MeNq4Y_ETxAMHTQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hg4zT-DMBrSA2QXQ_rTGBw&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF_r9e-v-clLtU_Q6yBYNuTZ-iBnA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12122034</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hg4zT-DMBrSA2QXQ_rTGBw&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF_r9e-v-clLtU_Q6yBYNuTZ-iBnA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuQyT67-F-Xo2AXbm4HLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNES-dtATd63_tSUD8tOXbnOCJleOA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12117288</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuQyT67-F-Xo2AXbm4HLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNES-dtATd63_tSUD8tOXbnOCJleOA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J7oyT9mlFMKK2wWK9bi7Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFktV7IVWh6xNedntmFIeuxvJuPZg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12110353</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J7oyT9mlFMKK2wWK9bi7Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFktV7IVWh6xNedntmFIeuxvJuPZg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=x5AyT8SOB8WzsALO84yxDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFyHkCzwLYSN2tvnQwmA0tVOwBvCA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12098494</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=x5AyT8SOB8WzsALO84yxDA&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFyHkCzwLYSN2tvnQwmA0tVOwBvCA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zWUyT4LrA8mpsAKWxPGBBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0K0ojkPJxCU1nIb6Cym1xhXarGw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12093814</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zWUyT4LrA8mpsAKWxPGBBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0K0ojkPJxCU1nIb6Cym1xhXarGw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m14yT6TbFcyLsAKEoMXrBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEoSPIN2IAys37ljR8_iAHFGtMelA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12092789</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m14yT6TbFcyLsAKEoMXrBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEoSPIN2IAys37ljR8_iAHFGtMelA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjsyT6O2NYXY2QXvvLSxBw&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmw20pu0UY7SOi55q0v3El6puWBA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12088771</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjsyT6O2NYXY2QXvvLSxBw&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmw20pu0UY7SOi55q0v3El6puWBA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UhEyT5_nJKX9sQKjqeCFBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNErSFSYXw5B0wbXwP5RwaIU05aIGA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12087164</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UhEyT5_nJKX9sQKjqeCFBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNErSFSYXw5B0wbXwP5RwaIU05aIGA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HOcxT5vNOaaIsQKfhpThBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFnqOqkVzQOYDcqvMN3AfOcIMJPA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12082958</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HOcxT5vNOaaIsQKfhpThBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFnqOqkVzQOYDcqvMN3AfOcIMJPA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A70xT_q7LOmIsgKlhIjnBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGotzzEBa6XBQulFd6z1TUnzEOf7A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12082795</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A70xT_q7LOmIsgKlhIjnBg&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGotzzEBa6XBQulFd6z1TUnzEOf7A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4ZIxT-_5GZKNsAKT3a2cBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHVJqusVNRNA90YIiXJz8zCZ4-mwQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12082578</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4ZIxT-_5GZKNsAKT3a2cBw&amp;amp;ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHVJqusVNRNA90YIiXJz8zCZ4-mwQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tj8xT4DkCYetsQLFpMHiBg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvSq_qRXukY-zqMv-dhwphR1oLWg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12076282</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tj8xT4DkCYetsQLFpMHiBg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvSq_qRXukY-zqMv-dhwphR1oLWg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kCMxT-TeO4SPsQKH7MiPBw&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFi-3trbYyg40FdQQ_y2yis1_pPrw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12076147</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kCMxT-TeO4SPsQKH7MiPBw&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFi-3trbYyg40FdQQ_y2yis1_pPrw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KxcwT5z1AcjA2gXf5tiKDw&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHmSQ4MWT7fmWfStspcAia_xOD43A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12065702</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KxcwT5z1AcjA2gXf5tiKDw&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHmSQ4MWT7fmWfStspcAia_xOD43A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8uwvT_ylBsSRsALsiN2ADg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEaEah630f48glhfqpwRGbJK4PIDw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12053965</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8uwvT_ylBsSRsALsiN2ADg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEaEah630f48glhfqpwRGbJK4PIDw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ucIvT9OLJKSCsgLymPyyDg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFC2pPSpWVUCUQOk57D3-A24NZ69A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12048824</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ucIvT9OLJKSCsgLymPyyDg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFC2pPSpWVUCUQOk57D3-A24NZ69A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PLQvT8nMK4arsALLvr2SDg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKGgPP_FK4YkoSdCSy-NgTsz5fXg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12046559</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PLQvT8nMK4arsALLvr2SDg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKGgPP_FK4YkoSdCSy-NgTsz5fXg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bZgvT8PvOebC2wWuy4ThDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGMZ99VDMiQwdvU4JCeCfoY7lDUow" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12043023</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bZgvT8PvOebC2wWuy4ThDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGMZ99VDMiQwdvU4JCeCfoY7lDUow&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Um4vT96RFeWksQKu9ciJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFHZP0anMyE9HITAdLXVliRtwxQmA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12041327</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Um4vT96RFeWksQKu9ciJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFHZP0anMyE9HITAdLXVliRtwxQmA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FkQvT8nqB8OJsgL56cW-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG0iw2S48ASnyLq-XqJwiDkz280dw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12038224</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FkQvT8nqB8OJsgL56cW-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG0iw2S48ASnyLq-XqJwiDkz280dw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1hkvT6CxE82GsALz-uCdDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEeFSAfxcNv6V7Uim237RkXKDcZsg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12038095</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1hkvT6CxE82GsALz-uCdDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEeFSAfxcNv6V7Uim237RkXKDcZsg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z-8uT6T5Ja7IsQLuuJWjDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEh4gW3FiHZfl58k2maZ_ZVFT_tjA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12037964</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z-8uT6T5Ja7IsQLuuJWjDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEh4gW3FiHZfl58k2maZ_ZVFT_tjA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jMUuT6nkL7Cl2AXO5LnrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGB1FaIwohyr0bvdplQj_fl8jWQnA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12037049</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jMUuT6nkL7Cl2AXO5LnrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGB1FaIwohyr0bvdplQj_fl8jWQnA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=apsuT92DCqfs2QX43Z2ADw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEdLCJv7WdM399dBwY_dxuLw020Fw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12027166</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=apsuT92DCqfs2QX43Z2ADw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEdLCJv7WdM399dBwY_dxuLw020Fw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P3EuT7SlBoPnsQLSq92hDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFomYePkm8g2PPg3NPo0mwJwKG79g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12022367</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P3EuT7SlBoPnsQLSq92hDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFomYePkm8g2PPg3NPo0mwJwKG79g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gGYuT-DQN-rFsQLDrpXrDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwfzdSMZbObEafluBo57x7XBY2fA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12021051</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gGYuT-DQN-rFsQLDrpXrDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwfzdSMZbObEafluBo57x7XBY2fA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=30YuT9aRA6LpsQKnzMD_DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHu_4jhLE4rG2T0QNv3l8I9572aww" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12017453</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=30YuT9aRA6LpsQKnzMD_DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHu_4jhLE4rG2T0QNv3l8I9572aww&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rhwuT5PqE5SisQL7-aHFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnv4RTCiSOmd369J02tJVf9Hpaww" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12015742</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rhwuT5PqE5SisQL7-aHFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnv4RTCiSOmd369J02tJVf9Hpaww&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oPItT9isL9H82gXPr63iDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGTOePU32MApylNom0AJo--Ak21tQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12012544</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oPItT9isL9H82gXPr63iDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGTOePU32MApylNom0AJo--Ak21tQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ccgtT-3uBqnA2gX7-P3qDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF14AefkCHuUtVOKRr-GrxAAxAihg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12011700</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ccgtT-3uBqnA2gX7-P3qDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF14AefkCHuUtVOKRr-GrxAAxAihg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TJ4tT-HeBsSRsALsiN2ADg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEc95fvwx5NHxYBiaIYqJ5Uj5uMXQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12007526</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TJ4tT-HeBsSRsALsiN2ADg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEc95fvwx5NHxYBiaIYqJ5Uj5uMXQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F3QtT9PDF8H22AWUhqWLDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9aYB3ncH0KcfL2TZn7X5X4iSA6w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/12000739</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F3QtT9PDF8H22AWUhqWLDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9aYB3ncH0KcfL2TZn7X5X4iSA6w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=60ktT7bEOYfg2QWh3Y2XDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH-V6r6N9gXMH-GwW33H4fqN48USw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11988880</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=60ktT7bEOYfg2QWh3Y2XDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH-V6r6N9gXMH-GwW33H4fqN48USw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wh8tT4uZNoazsAK0vPSJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFOWscjn3P9_evz__CsKCXDo2d1ZA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11983372</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wh8tT4uZNoazsAK0vPSJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFOWscjn3P9_evz__CsKCXDo2d1ZA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rhctT_y-B6OIsgKM_LGWDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6ZqSDBh85HfGJXJWyir3lDIjsFA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11982199</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rhctT_y-B6OIsgKM_LGWDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6ZqSDBh85HfGJXJWyir3lDIjsFA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YvUsT57NMs_5sQLUrcy7Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEWaC5et1PMW05U6tTqCGGK0T1Cmg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11978351</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YvUsT57NMs_5sQLUrcy7Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEWaC5et1PMW05U6tTqCGGK0T1Cmg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=V8ssT5H0O9HHsQLJm8DBDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFEy5qLrgvZuWnje9rD-BhRjhZ_dw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11976852</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=V8ssT5H0O9HHsQLJm8DBDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFEy5qLrgvZuWnje9rD-BhRjhZ_dw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FKEsT669EPP3sQL_s9WJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFaAIU5b9ARp1Ia4cc8-L7MftaJug" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11972740</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FKEsT669EPP3sQL_s9WJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFaAIU5b9ARp1Ia4cc8-L7MftaJug&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BXcsT9XfBOzhsQKl3dSoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfmeuEnOqgAQIdgZGR0rNbWqrv6g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11972524</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BXcsT9XfBOzhsQKl3dSoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfmeuEnOqgAQIdgZGR0rNbWqrv6g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v0wsT-K8Aqm62gXivNzrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9PdmufanYufwxd87EfUyqLVMoLg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11972248</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v0wsT-K8Aqm62gXivNzrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9PdmufanYufwxd87EfUyqLVMoLg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SfgrT_DJIMnq2wWh6oCfDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF7D4kB3ZO1TzNsA6v5ggiWgMeGmw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11963636</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SfgrT_DJIMnq2wWh6oCfDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF7D4kB3ZO1TzNsA6v5ggiWgMeGmw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MM4rT_GMJYWQsQLc85WlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECoOIVTntKxc7GefLTTbq_l54-aQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11963472</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MM4rT_GMJYWQsQLc85WlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CDwQmAEwBw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECoOIVTntKxc7GefLTTbq_l54-aQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MCspT_DcOYfq2AXw_f28BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFz1yiZ8vlPKHNycPIXjSMGU7nYoQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11943528</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MCspT_DcOYfq2AXw_f28BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFz1yiZ8vlPKHNycPIXjSMGU7nYoQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dh4pT6fYDaGGsgLf2-njAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFkpTiKFEs0dmn5oueh_m-rzpGD1w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11941747</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dh4pT6fYDaGGsgLf2-njAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFkpTiKFEs0dmn5oueh_m-rzpGD1w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8gApT_mBPbSmsQKgzb3nAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE5-A1yo-yeY_hyM3ay5tkPUJwKTw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11938417</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8gApT_mBPbSmsQKgzb3nAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE5-A1yo-yeY_hyM3ay5tkPUJwKTw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=y9YoT_ysMfKGsgLFmsSlAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGebhPJ0qjGiE23E79XbF9tfhIh7A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11936882</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=y9YoT_ysMfKGsgLFmsSlAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGebhPJ0qjGiE23E79XbF9tfhIh7A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oqwoT_mXD9K62gWXwMzDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHAWWVfIeUGZQE3hosjPdn1UJnqUg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11932888</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oqwoT_mXD9K62gWXwMzDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHAWWVfIeUGZQE3hosjPdn1UJnqUg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=boIoT7mnHMm_2QXy6um4Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFn9KvRNw6M_CzHhFlza-PeVSVsJQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11932743</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=boIoT7mnHMm_2QXy6um4Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFn9KvRNw6M_CzHhFlza-PeVSVsJQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=N1goT-f9CoTC2wWxyYDMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF45WNSZgr5LGyrRkG8xLmWO-OaGA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11930004</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=N1goT-f9CoTC2wWxyYDMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF45WNSZgr5LGyrRkG8xLmWO-OaGA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_y0oT7eWFIrCsQKVkfW_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFC26xqCOPlvJuA5-u0rE5jJhCMCg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11923128</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_y0oT7eWFIrCsQKVkfW_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFC26xqCOPlvJuA5-u0rE5jJhCMCg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3AMoT4F4pKDYBZOPybcC&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEEpkQL-bRiQMCnt2AVyChRIXKkoA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11910537</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3AMoT4F4pKDYBZOPybcC&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEEpkQL-bRiQMCnt2AVyChRIXKkoA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m9knT5zJLojo2gXjzaG5Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHb3zuFnHe5035R1btGbE9008fs0A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11905303</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m9knT5zJLojo2gXjzaG5Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHb3zuFnHe5035R1btGbE9008fs0A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aMgnT-X9N8uKsAKynY3jAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGBhCILPA8PkgFkeivL2tFW8V8mEw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11902548</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aMgnT-X9N8uKsAKynY3jAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGBhCILPA8PkgFkeivL2tFW8V8mEw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Wq8nT4GpOY382gWf5Z3fAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHnNqVlP_r8L3zlLjj40gn6MmzYXQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11899381</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Wq8nT4GpOY382gWf5Z3fAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHnNqVlP_r8L3zlLjj40gn6MmzYXQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PoUnT4jVF-OIsQKf2K39Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElAhieljRnk23MFn3zQ0Bo_b0hYA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11897484</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PoUnT4jVF-OIsQKf2K39Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElAhieljRnk23MFn3zQ0Bo_b0hYA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-FonT6WoGMma2gX6zsTCAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC0QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHAfCUrFSZ0FQtvrc-9OxoGdYDnDA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11892996</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-FonT6WoGMma2gX6zsTCAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC0QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHAfCUrFSZ0FQtvrc-9OxoGdYDnDA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xTAnT4iUBeT02wWq3ey_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKFHrfdfjpvvR5vDn2vMn8_NCANg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11892870</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xTAnT4iUBeT02wWq3ey_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKFHrfdfjpvvR5vDn2vMn8_NCANg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lQYnT5vhMOf4sQK_gt2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESeGpGyO82btl-TwKMQ603GCW3AA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11892744</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lQYnT5vhMOf4sQK_gt2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESeGpGyO82btl-TwKMQ603GCW3AA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9wmT-XwEuSusAKRs72NAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCxez_hkb4MZClsPbNEqftWC0A5w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11890997</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9wmT-XwEuSusAKRs72NAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCxez_hkb4MZClsPbNEqftWC0A5w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ULImT5n7FaiLsgL-mcmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMYt2kLHb2NrAR2OqeoOkkrs7f2g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11888256</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ULImT5n7FaiLsgL-mcmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMYt2kLHb2NrAR2OqeoOkkrs7f2g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JIgmT_XmEKrJsQLj_aiMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHWm-aaEoMZEejBC7RxXN_FtJ1kTA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11882876</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JIgmT_XmEKrJsQLj_aiMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHWm-aaEoMZEejBC7RxXN_FtJ1kTA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BHYmT4PGDJSosAL5zKyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnfukaVG1TJsF3yDlmtVzMMXXUkg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11879957</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BHYmT4PGDJSosAL5zKyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnfukaVG1TJsF3yDlmtVzMMXXUkg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1V0mT-H_G-XLsQK9n9yMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC0QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEl_OzN6_o5MD5rT5t1C34ysHsWtQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11876809</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1V0mT-H_G-XLsQK9n9yMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC0QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEl_OzN6_o5MD5rT5t1C34ysHsWtQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzMmT5PhLu2gsQKG-PGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFuAotyZx1dCflWgqr3HpEXx009XA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11874976</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzMmT5PhLu2gsQKG-PGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFuAotyZx1dCflWgqr3HpEXx009XA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eQkmT4OPGYavsALR5KWMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjj9ZJ7o_P22ydlaisPDIbBR7BFw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11871722</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eQkmT4OPGYavsALR5KWMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjj9ZJ7o_P22ydlaisPDIbBR7BFw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=at8lT9_3CcO3sQKW-cCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVPX7nhu2su0LdNrxErdRsIMWnsA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11871594</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=at8lT9_3CcO3sQKW-cCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVPX7nhu2su0LdNrxErdRsIMWnsA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MbUlT6XhDMmHsAKntqCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEakEG8YnChZLWvj4HXbI69MnBxbg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11869254</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MbUlT6XhDMmHsAKntqCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEakEG8YnChZLWvj4HXbI69MnBxbg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DIslT4u1K-GtsQLvqKCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUTFj_X-M85KFioVIjtDw5SAjyeQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11862158</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DIslT4u1K-GtsQLvqKCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUTFj_X-M85KFioVIjtDw5SAjyeQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WAlT8bkDsuKsAKn8OmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEWLMRta5S6fgk-5i4XIUAXuwIlYw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11849833</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WAlT8bkDsuKsAKn8OmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEWLMRta5S6fgk-5i4XIUAXuwIlYw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzYlT8H5DIqvsALLq9GMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNES4ZA7mDvM-43nw4poX_eCPCiuKg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11844331</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzYlT8H5DIqvsALLq9GMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNES4ZA7mDvM-43nw4poX_eCPCiuKg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZiUlT_2KN-rCsQLXse2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGBw2W4l4hy5P2oqe3vJZi9LrM1fA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11841768</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZiUlT_2KN-rCsQLXse2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGBw2W4l4hy5P2oqe3vJZi9LrM1fA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WgwlT97EO4OxsALrz4mNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEr6dVCIHQTvrqrEYoCY1gFVx7UeQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11838640</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WgwlT97EO4OxsALrz4mNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEr6dVCIHQTvrqrEYoCY1gFVx7UeQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuIkT6-6C4yqsALiq5CNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEOxqrunwTU-kKW0yvisjoL7rYRgQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11836756</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuIkT6-6C4yqsALiq5CNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEOxqrunwTU-kKW0yvisjoL7rYRgQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F7gkT_PHE4-CsgL25M2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHe6LJb63qm2kQqbYQeb6Es0L9HJA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11833270</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F7gkT_PHE4-CsgL25M2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHe6LJb63qm2kQqbYQeb6Es0L9HJA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Y0kT7jiGauksQLywOyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwXrGhdZx64oV2Rbse-JI7BjJVfA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11833133</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Y0kT7jiGauksQLywOyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwXrGhdZx64oV2Rbse-JI7BjJVfA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vmMkT6SaGe2AsgLFkLmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJ3YiqFW66iRUt_kM5NzX7iLGvlA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11829870</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vmMkT6SaGe2AsgLFkLmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJ3YiqFW66iRUt_kM5NzX7iLGvlA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hjkkT6eTEImJsALS7fGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFNZ4AsMCmBclObnPLXq_yR77UKoQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11822974</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hjkkT6eTEImJsALS7fGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFNZ4AsMCmBclObnPLXq_yR77UKoQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Xw8kT_yYA6LksQLtkaSMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSZtEoFxw42lqZtJ4C9qHTTESQjg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11810666</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Xw8kT_yYA6LksQLtkaSMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSZtEoFxw42lqZtJ4C9qHTTESQjg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P-UjT_WYK-mxsAKzoa2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGu4o3fSZLqP_OCaR81auc8Gi_AEA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11805715</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P-UjT_WYK-mxsAKzoa2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGu4o3fSZLqP_OCaR81auc8Gi_AEA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WdQjT7XWCeSmsQKDtamMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGm2YE5gMjWKcDuUT2MM43PbTdJ9Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11803386</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WdQjT7XWCeSmsQKDtamMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGm2YE5gMjWKcDuUT2MM43PbTdJ9Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3rojT9vTK8Loggf0_MHTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF_3cWapLgMMyTsl5MHFnYlluPdaQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11800246</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3rojT9vTK8Loggf0_MHTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF_3cWapLgMMyTsl5MHFnYlluPdaQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xZAjT4HkCYT-ggeoi7nhCA&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGipN0qhtxF9B1Jw0cQ5mNabXeaDQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11798993</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xZAjT4HkCYT-ggeoi7nhCA&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGipN0qhtxF9B1Jw0cQ5mNabXeaDQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m2YjT_GdKMT2ggeokLT7CA&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-XXhj1hRZMSwH8OITNYxMk2k9dw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11795245</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m2YjT_GdKMT2ggeokLT7CA&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-XXhj1hRZMSwH8OITNYxMk2k9dw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cTwjT9vTLsX7ggeD5v3bCA&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0vRNtq5IXRBjYsj-NXoWHrKynvQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11795114</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cTwjT9vTLsX7ggeD5v3bCA&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0vRNtq5IXRBjYsj-NXoWHrKynvQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QhIjT-yVCoaegwfgtIjnCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8AC1Mu6LLt-bRxASYW_nUcvdUWA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11791289</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QhIjT-yVCoaegwfgtIjnCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8AC1Mu6LLt-bRxASYW_nUcvdUWA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EugiT8H5FsmRsAKGp7yOCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8maTtAfGbZ9PpqgeaafeOA4YJOA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11784507</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EugiT8H5FsmRsAKGp7yOCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8maTtAfGbZ9PpqgeaafeOA4YJOA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5r0iT8rHDKu_2QX_7IngDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGt9UmYtJYpJJYXyrPBysA8Ij2fUA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11772571</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5r0iT8rHDKu_2QX_7IngDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGt9UmYtJYpJJYXyrPBysA8Ij2fUA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ppMiT6nGJceisQLvzfWECQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEbZKHckyI_OsCMPBLxLSsYjlcq_A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11768054</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ppMiT6nGJceisQLvzfWECQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEbZKHckyI_OsCMPBLxLSsYjlcq_A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VYMiT52vMMji2QWBi_XeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3vruToap6J0wM742rt30o3GQ0dw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11765481</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VYMiT52vMMji2QWBi_XeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3vruToap6J0wM742rt30o3GQ0dw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WmkiT7b_OejA2gXAhrXgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGV4raEnsBq8bZOsAstCrlQrcRT_w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11762336</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WmkiT7b_OejA2gXAhrXgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGV4raEnsBq8bZOsAstCrlQrcRT_w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Kz8iT8SaBMPDsQLD8qi1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBNMtA9GfZVdHnKldX7VrucHP-8g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11761012</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Kz8iT8SaBMPDsQLD8qi1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBNMtA9GfZVdHnKldX7VrucHP-8g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DBUiT_KmNMXy2QXqt5XfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEkd9zHmPJ2kK0JHxi47PfSII2FGA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11756856</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DBUiT_KmNMXy2QXqt5XfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEkd9zHmPJ2kK0JHxi47PfSII2FGA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5OohT965J4Trggf05qT8CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0dpzoo9nVx0L1jqoOc-M0LU6yLw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11756636</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5OohT965J4Trggf05qT8CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0dpzoo9nVx0L1jqoOc-M0LU6yLw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vcAhT7fCIc3hsQLU6PG6CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGoiZDVWu0l48YQa-G1BpSVEftcig" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11752032</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vcAhT7fCIc3hsQLU6PG6CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGoiZDVWu0l48YQa-G1BpSVEftcig&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jZYhT67gC8WqsQKtqtT_CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEqic_2liTi8mrlbEiHo8d_sokeJA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11744840</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jZYhT67gC8WqsQKtqtT_CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEqic_2liTi8mrlbEiHo8d_sokeJA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WmwhT9HEKMa22gWX9uzxDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF2QD31PCC4wO-zlhEIz-xz-M9a6g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11732898</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY. S. 1867 would authorize appropriations totaling $662 billion for ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WmwhT9HEKMa22gWX9uzxDw&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQmAEwBQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF2QD31PCC4wO-zlhEIz-xz-M9a6g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LUIhT_ihB7KnsAK2yqG4CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgWNeQQ5ASEtQRBmDYqr1q2fkfXA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11728779</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY. S. 1867 would authorize appropriations totaling $662 billion for ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LUIhT_ihB7KnsAK2yqG4CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgWNeQQ5ASEtQRBmDYqr1q2fkfXA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9TEhT9WgO--GsAKk9LCxCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnxXeKxhe7kHd5owrN-1192ce1PQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11726531</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY. S. 1867 would authorize appropriations totaling $662 billion for ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9TEhT9WgO--GsAKk9LCxCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnxXeKxhe7kHd5owrN-1192ce1PQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xchT4jJCuissQLS48C1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDfHCi59iFsk2ezePxInPkoj3eZQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11723538</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY. S. 1867 would authorize appropriations totaling $662 billion for ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xchT4jJCuissQLS48C1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC4QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDfHCi59iFsk2ezePxInPkoj3eZQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-0gT920Ieb6sQLAysTDCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGAjFLE67mSjrbcuSmsbi-w8IFigw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11722183</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY. S. 1867 would authorize appropriations totaling $662 billion for ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-0gT920Ieb6sQLAysTDCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGAjFLE67mSjrbcuSmsbi-w8IFigw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mcMgT-zrH-KOsQL_prSlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0P7JhLCAPg9wcm-Cqa6jm2qTTaQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11717824</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY. S. 1867 would authorize appropriations totaling $662 billion for ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mcMgT-zrH-KOsQL_prSlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0P7JhLCAPg9wcm-Cqa6jm2qTTaQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dJkgT9LOMs_fsQKX5qSYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNX134eqz_9BZT0tKrZje4-DoDeA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11717675</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY. S. 1867 would authorize appropriations totaling $662 billion for ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm%3Findex%3D12575&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dJkgT9LOMs_fsQKX5qSYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDcQmAEwBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGNX134eqz_9BZT0tKrZje4-DoDeA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>striking the indefinite military detention provision ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/roll_call/show/9543" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11664976</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Amendment (S.Amdt.1107) to S.1867: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/roll_call/show/9543&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867</title>
    <link href="http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=12575" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11432028</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=1772&amp;amp;type=0&amp;amp;sequence=2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. COST ESTIMATE. November 28, 2011. S. 1867. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. As reported by the Senate Committee on Armed Services on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=12575&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 Coverage - McCain vs. Rand Paul | Ron Paul 2012 | Sound ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.dailypaul.com/189568/s-1867-live-now-on-c-span2" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-29:/commentary/11431589</id>
    <updated>2011-11-29T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sunny</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Statement from Rand Paul. http://youtu.be/rghhz_t5POo. S. 1867 National Defense Authorization Act Bill it will be on LIVE @ 10:00 AM EST on C-SPAN2. You can stream it. This is the MOST important event going on right now. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailypaul.com/189568/s-1867-live-now-on-c-span2&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL ...</title>
    <link href="http://thedirtylowdown.wordpress.com/2011/11/29/s-1867-national-defense-authorization-act-for-fiscal-year-2012/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-28:/commentary/11430863</id>
    <updated>2011-11-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>John Dilligent</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1867 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012 &amp;middot; COOL CLIP OF THE DAY &amp;middot; WHY ARE ALL THE LITTLE GIRLS SO ANGRY? LEAKED ACTUAL SPYCAM FOOTAGE OF SADDAM HUSSEIN ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thedirtylowdown.wordpress.com/2011/11/29/s-1867-national-defense-authorization-act-for-fiscal-year-2012/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Whiskey and Gunpowder Article: Senate Bill S.1867 scheduled to ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.tngovwatch.org/whiskey-and-gunpowder-article-senate-bill-s-1867-scheduled-to-vote-today-scary-what-do-you-think/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-28:/commentary/11430861</id>
    <updated>2011-11-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Whiskey &amp;amp; Gunpowder &#8212; The Daily Missive of. Laissez Books. World War III&#8230;The totalitarian police state&#8230;Both still on track&#8230; We hope you had a great Thanksgiving. Because the news this Monday sucks; It&amp;#39;s not all bad ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tngovwatch.org/whiskey-and-gunpowder-article-senate-bill-s-1867-scheduled-to-vote-today-scary-what-do-you-think/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NDAA BILL S 1867 drafted in Secret by Senator John McCain and ...</title>
    <link href="http://thehighlandsteaparty.com/?p=2049" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-28:/commentary/11430860</id>
    <updated>2011-11-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>John Nelson</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Under the &amp;#39;worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial&amp;#39; provision of S.1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill, which is set to be up for a vote on the Senate floor this week, the legislation will &#8220;basically say in ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehighlandsteaparty.com/?p=2049&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill S -1867 Is Creating A Furor | Independent Sentinel</title>
    <link href="http://www.independentsentinel.com/2011/11/bill-s-1867-is-creating-a-furor/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-28:/commentary/11430859</id>
    <updated>2011-11-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sara Noble</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Bill S.1867, also known as the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, is creating angst with people on the left and the right. The bipartisan bill, which was drawn up by the Senate in closed session, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.independentsentinel.com/2011/11/bill-s-1867-is-creating-a-furor/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Vote on S.1867 will Allow Military To Intern Americans ...</title>
    <link href="http://yourdaddy.net/2011/11/28/senate-vote-on-s-1867-will-allow-military-to-intern-americans-without-trial/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-28:/commentary/11430858</id>
    <updated>2011-11-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>notalemming</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Under the &amp;#39;worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial&amp;#39; provision of S.1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill, which is set to be up for a vote on the Senate floor this week, the legislation will &#8220;basically say in ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://yourdaddy.net/2011/11/28/senate-vote-on-s-1867-will-allow-military-to-intern-americans-without-trial/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: The hunting of America expands &#171; The PPJ Gazette</title>
    <link href="http://ppjg.wordpress.com/2011/11/27/s-1867-hunting-americans/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-28:/commentary/11430857</id>
    <updated>2011-11-28T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ppjg</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 is a catch all bill. Its intention is to make legal (not lawful) the crime of unlawful detention without due process. By extension, the bill would condone the practice of extraordinary rendition for the purpose of torture of US ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ppjg.wordpress.com/2011/11/27/s-1867-hunting-americans/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 | Mictlantecuhtli</title>
    <link href="http://profacero.wordpress.com/2011/11/26/s-1867/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-27:/commentary/11430866</id>
    <updated>2011-11-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Z</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1867. Here is a synopsis of SECTION 2031 of the bill to be voted on Monday or Tuesday by the United States Senate: It &#8220;affirms &#8230; the authority of the President &#8230; to detain covered persons (persons &#8220;who planned, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://profacero.wordpress.com/2011/11/26/s-1867/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867 the Department of Defense Authorization Act: It&amp;#39;s More ...</title>
    <link href="http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2011/11/26/s-1867-the-department-of-defense-authorization-act-its-more-convoluted-than-you-think/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-27:/commentary/11430864</id>
    <updated>2011-11-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>willyloman</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Indefinitely detaining terror suspects in military facilities and prosecuting them via military tribunals: Let&amp;#39;s make one thing perfectly clear &#8211; according to the letter of the law and the language of S. 1867, this does not apply to US ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2011/11/26/s-1867-the-department-of-defense-authorization-act-its-more-convoluted-than-you-think/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BBCW: S.1867, The National Defense Authorization Act: US Senate ...</title>
    <link href="http://bungalowbillscw.blogspot.com/2011/11/s1867-national-defense-authorization.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-27:/commentary/11430862</id>
    <updated>2011-11-27T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bungalow Bill</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Under the &amp;#39;worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial&amp;#39; provision of S.1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill, which is set to be up for a vote on the Senate floor Monday, the legislation will &#8220;basically say in ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bungalowbillscw.blogspot.com/2011/11/s1867-national-defense-authorization.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>No Miranda Rights for Americans URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vcAhT7fCIc3hsQLU6PG6CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVl6nWwqp5vrsC67QgrzZbih8Reg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-23:/commentary/11752035</id>
    <updated>2011-11-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>tatoott1009</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA .avi. Posted: November 23, 2011 in Uncategorized Tags: anonymous anon anony occupy wall street together bankers ... [[RED ALERT]]] STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY S. 1867 &#8211;.avi ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vcAhT7fCIc3hsQLU6PG6CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVl6nWwqp5vrsC67QgrzZbih8Reg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>No Miranda Rights for Americans URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jZYhT67gC8WqsQKtqtT_CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF830VeTrPIqTRfoQi-tmqZ49l-Sw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-23:/commentary/11744844</id>
    <updated>2011-11-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>tatoott1009</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA .avi. Posted: November 23, 2011 in Uncategorized Tags: anonymous anon anony occupy wall street together bankers ... [[RED ALERT]]] STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY S. 1867 &#8211;.avi ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jZYhT67gC8WqsQKtqtT_CA&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF830VeTrPIqTRfoQi-tmqZ49l-Sw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>No Miranda Rights for Americans URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LUIhT_ihB7KnsAK2yqG4CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9KCqvEmGurEkKTtnSNUQI7gCCIQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-23:/commentary/11728783</id>
    <updated>2011-11-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>tatoott1009</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA .avi. Posted: November 23, 2011 in Uncategorized Tags: anonymous anon anony occupy wall street together bankers ... [[RED ALERT]]] STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY S. 1867 &#8211;.avi ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LUIhT_ihB7KnsAK2yqG4CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9KCqvEmGurEkKTtnSNUQI7gCCIQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>No Miranda Rights for Americans URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9TEhT9WgO--GsAKk9LCxCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRkWJj5Hn9NkUvKSW1XCkXsyLM1w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-23:/commentary/11726535</id>
    <updated>2011-11-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>tatoott1009</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA .avi. Posted: November 23, 2011 in Uncategorized Tags: anonymous anon anony occupy wall street together bankers ... [[RED ALERT]]] STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY S. 1867 &#8211;.avi ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9TEhT9WgO--GsAKk9LCxCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRkWJj5Hn9NkUvKSW1XCkXsyLM1w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>No Miranda Rights for Americans URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xchT4jJCuissQLS48C1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHELettNohjqN2wg25ZBKdxCY5t_g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-23:/commentary/11723542</id>
    <updated>2011-11-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>tatoott1009</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA .avi. Posted: November 23, 2011 in Uncategorized Tags: anonymous anon anony occupy wall street together bankers ... [[RED ALERT]]] STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY S. 1867 &#8211;.avi ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xchT4jJCuissQLS48C1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHELettNohjqN2wg25ZBKdxCY5t_g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>No Miranda Rights for Americans URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-0gT920Ieb6sQLAysTDCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXZqxN91ay9CCVmtwJGCDWKoErlw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-23:/commentary/11722185</id>
    <updated>2011-11-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>tatoott1009</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA .avi. Posted: November 23, 2011 in Uncategorized Tags: anonymous anon anony occupy wall street together bankers ... [[RED ALERT]]] STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY S. 1867 &#8211;.avi ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-0gT920Ieb6sQLAysTDCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXZqxN91ay9CCVmtwJGCDWKoErlw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>No Miranda Rights for Americans URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mcMgT-zrH-KOsQL_prSlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGo_cjg2DcRbboOgiNZC9Uv2BPH7Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-23:/commentary/11717826</id>
    <updated>2011-11-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>tatoott1009</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA .avi. Posted: November 23, 2011 in Uncategorized Tags: anonymous anon anony occupy wall street together bankers ... [[RED ALERT]]] STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY S. 1867 &#8211;.avi ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mcMgT-zrH-KOsQL_prSlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGo_cjg2DcRbboOgiNZC9Uv2BPH7Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>No Miranda Rights for Americans URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dJkgT9LOMs_fsQKX5qSYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF2hE6S9q_lMwCMUR9xTv9LwLdIQg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-23:/commentary/11717677</id>
    <updated>2011-11-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>tatoott1009</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA .avi. Posted: November 23, 2011 in Uncategorized Tags: anonymous anon anony occupy wall street together bankers ... [[RED ALERT]]] STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY S. 1867 &#8211;.avi ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dJkgT9LOMs_fsQKX5qSYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CEQQmAEwCQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF2hE6S9q_lMwCMUR9xTv9LwLdIQg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>No Miranda Rights for Americans URGENT ALERT!! SENATE HAS ...</title>
    <link href="http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-23:/commentary/11699453</id>
    <updated>2011-11-23T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>tatoott1009</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SENATE HAS NOW PASSED S.1867&#8230;NDAA .avi. Posted: November 23, 2011 in Uncategorized Tags: anonymous anon anony occupy wall street together bankers ... [[RED ALERT]]] STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY S. 1867 &#8211;.avi ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tatoott1009.com/2011/11/23/the-black-dot-in-the-sun-avi/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LrPHT7GBCoe62gXjueGgCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZ9svY1inkeJYMttWNdphJR9Pyuw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/15502632</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LrPHT7GBCoe62gXjueGgCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZ9svY1inkeJYMttWNdphJR9Pyuw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1A7FT7T7Ma-KsAKQnKzZCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEm9emG0XZOti-d1ihOTCnbysTrTg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/15468256</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1A7FT7T7Ma-KsAKQnKzZCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEm9emG0XZOti-d1ihOTCnbysTrTg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UMe_T_uVAeTMsQLx76TnCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvKs3YqX0E63C5rpBi1O6MtTrsxw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/15405072</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UMe_T_uVAeTMsQLx76TnCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvKs3YqX0E63C5rpBi1O6MtTrsxw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ACC_T4C9LIeq2QWzu-mRCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfcJUWXfBCybpWCKLHadFMobDLjg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/15401803</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ACC_T4C9LIeq2QWzu-mRCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfcJUWXfBCybpWCKLHadFMobDLjg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bde7T_OXE6eA2gXB7JSqCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJfMIju5WrI590l8W4N5r31HR8MQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/15345728</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bde7T_OXE6eA2gXB7JSqCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJfMIju5WrI590l8W4N5r31HR8MQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=woO6T6rlEuKC2AWl1aWjCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGAeUZF34wZFVzaBrMG91ystrfRKQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/15336739</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=woO6T6rlEuKC2AWl1aWjCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGAeUZF34wZFVzaBrMG91ystrfRKQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lt-3T6nuEuOA2wWPptm9CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3rVKHOT149C1NJktRkqQ6NRfV2A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/15319479</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lt-3T6nuEuOA2wWPptm9CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3rVKHOT149C1NJktRkqQ6NRfV2A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WZqyT4njM5S3tweNvJzyCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBo43qWVPjVQ_bQ1xPWDuvUcO_VQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/15268559</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WZqyT4njM5S3tweNvJzyCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBo43qWVPjVQ_bQ1xPWDuvUcO_VQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NUexT4bNFNLk2wX0p83pCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFg7BmFOsITVk6Yyy8QzDKDsBueVQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/15246947</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NUexT4bNFNLk2wX0p83pCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFg7BmFOsITVk6Yyy8QzDKDsBueVQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zqOuT4HVOMme2wX6p6jpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFBBJz78kOP4LYtO054Bltv5zn1SQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/15216357</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zqOuT4HVOMme2wX6p6jpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFBBJz78kOP4LYtO054Bltv5zn1SQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C1atT86oL8qEgwfMpNC5DA&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH3FWiiEtJTUg-MiVmbI59idSYQKw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/15205210</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C1atT86oL8qEgwfMpNC5DA&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH3FWiiEtJTUg-MiVmbI59idSYQKw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GbGqT56yGYLu2gWJqP2oAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfGhQ-cLlu5PtQZwIuuLyYUK-Wug" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/15170989</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GbGqT56yGYLu2gWJqP2oAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfGhQ-cLlu5PtQZwIuuLyYUK-Wug&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=E1-pT6HROtPdgQeClLXiAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2xK8iirj8bbtOplyerMu5sL_Ohw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/15151251</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=E1-pT6HROtPdgQeClLXiAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2xK8iirj8bbtOplyerMu5sL_Ohw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XLmmT77YDOjy2QWwkJmmAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJIZgilHVvGQ2jqX0N8UMFNLk3sw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/15095060</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XLmmT77YDOjy2QWwkJmmAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJIZgilHVvGQ2jqX0N8UMFNLk3sw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fxikT5LqCo-E8ATfwbS5CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGrC_cI4JPw9_2wujo208demF-IQQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/15039746</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fxikT5LqCo-E8ATfwbS5CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGrC_cI4JPw9_2wujo208demF-IQQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=I3ahT-uSLui22gWm-N27CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH2yG9U28YrP1Izc4qeHZDHSUXIfQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14983403</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=I3ahT-uSLui22gWm-N27CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH2yG9U28YrP1Izc4qeHZDHSUXIfQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tCWgT9CzAuje6QHTjbW1Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGTFXWjhnnFtTflakdWi4nuupRkEA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14955659</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tCWgT9CzAuje6QHTjbW1Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGTFXWjhnnFtTflakdWi4nuupRkEA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=neaYT5qqHYn02QWL0MX5Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhnO-kV2H0WUiWZgw2_6SIUyA3aw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14797961</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=neaYT5qqHYn02QWL0MX5Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhnO-kV2H0WUiWZgw2_6SIUyA3aw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U1mRT8vYK8mq2QWeodmCBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfx-BOnOSUsw80N_aWLnTr3vV7Ig" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14631445</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U1mRT8vYK8mq2QWeodmCBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfx-BOnOSUsw80N_aWLnTr3vV7Ig&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R5uQT7rnE4ny2QXYrdiBBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjPOMGtEQZUV0miwJkCVTbj0n4xA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14616348</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R5uQT7rnE4ny2QXYrdiBBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjPOMGtEQZUV0miwJkCVTbj0n4xA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BXGQT_qTHury2QWYzbWVBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVdMoOJoa-AgK7CF2rghXLHoYKuw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14611936</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BXGQT_qTHury2QWYzbWVBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVdMoOJoa-AgK7CF2rghXLHoYKuw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LEeQT9WIK8He2QXUybiMBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPfxs0D_4yqSAEsK3BcE8IMRdYpQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14607820</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LEeQT9WIK8He2QXUybiMBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPfxs0D_4yqSAEsK3BcE8IMRdYpQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=shyQT4niKsKg2gXOxdmXBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhnvx74uV8uBmvRhsNkVMb9l526w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14601470</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=shyQT4niKsKg2gXOxdmXBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhnvx74uV8uBmvRhsNkVMb9l526w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6_KPT563GuLM2AXnufyWBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqKJGTYfs-BH0SfTqkDIe3rVE7Hg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14597969</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6_KPT563GuLM2AXnufyWBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqKJGTYfs-BH0SfTqkDIe3rVE7Hg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=G56PT67xN8mC2wWC0sDnBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEd8Tqc2nnSR0_7pNu39z9rPg_S9w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14592722</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=G56PT67xN8mC2wWC0sDnBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEd8Tqc2nnSR0_7pNu39z9rPg_S9w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=23OPT--MOaeL2AWqyu36BA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGt-DJ30LctHx0nUwf927VcVROGJA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14585769</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=23OPT--MOaeL2AWqyu36BA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGt-DJ30LctHx0nUwf927VcVROGJA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HkqPT9i_G8_62AX1triQDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGU_S9ILFz8_7QmshiSdhqRT-smxQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14582014</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HkqPT9i_G8_62AX1triQDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGU_S9ILFz8_7QmshiSdhqRT-smxQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jR-PT4vHHYqA2gW9i9WFDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG8r81xoFUp5XqwO2KlN0thN4_ycQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14578186</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jR-PT4vHHYqA2gW9i9WFDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG8r81xoFUp5XqwO2KlN0thN4_ycQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UvWOT63EB6rq2AXrxLGiDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE5dz6tVTQeZ0253r7hwAQLWkDwfg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14573178</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UvWOT63EB6rq2AXrxLGiDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE5dz6tVTQeZ0253r7hwAQLWkDwfg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=88uOT6izDZLW2wXhkaiRDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9jzlgXmyfE1ejHDaFW3JgE4FdVw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14570268</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=88uOT6izDZLW2wXhkaiRDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9jzlgXmyfE1ejHDaFW3JgE4FdVw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EqKOT8TvIeWi2wWk4-HTCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHFtDm6V18m3HYRDXgVpiimt483Ig" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14568790</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EqKOT8TvIeWi2wWk4-HTCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHFtDm6V18m3HYRDXgVpiimt483Ig&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rXeOT_zDJKPY2gWGocX3Cw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG28ikX-aKqaGWnnTxE8s5aTVddlQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14566443</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rXeOT_zDJKPY2gWGocX3Cw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG28ikX-aKqaGWnnTxE8s5aTVddlQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wEyOT5q2GsOg2AWUybSQDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGWLoaQnhDtnSAYpJFa-ejHAGIkgg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14563952</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wEyOT5q2GsOg2AWUybSQDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGWLoaQnhDtnSAYpJFa-ejHAGIkgg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XiKOT_GMIMjK2AXaxYiPDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEkOhhpsm1PRFdwnUlSj8s4LXy9CA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14557329</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XiKOT_GMIMjK2AXaxYiPDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEkOhhpsm1PRFdwnUlSj8s4LXy9CA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TPiNT7vDBKai2QWwuPWsBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFM-atYwtwpfh2EMi9wjhYs2xntKg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14553660</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TPiNT7vDBKai2QWwuPWsBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFM-atYwtwpfh2EMi9wjhYs2xntKg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=K86NT8WcDaPq2AWPn8SeDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_KU7f3jOjuBlx1q5uZIct0R0GIQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14550091</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=K86NT8WcDaPq2AWPn8SeDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_KU7f3jOjuBlx1q5uZIct0R0GIQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xriNT66fK8ng2gXq6LD2Cw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGecLINryOoyO-89EeYM9PxBNAzTg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14548302</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xriNT66fK8ng2gXq6LD2Cw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGecLINryOoyO-89EeYM9PxBNAzTg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=a6SNT-PrCcWv8AG7k-WSBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4oqZ57W27UdHVHAjXhMAa-iPIEw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14543868</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=a6SNT-PrCcWv8AG7k-WSBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4oqZ57W27UdHVHAjXhMAa-iPIEw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=y42NT_GVPOae2gWT9fD2Cw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFSIE6LdHHZkIdqjm3mWrHuFRIt-g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14538631</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=y42NT_GVPOae2gWT9fD2Cw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFSIE6LdHHZkIdqjm3mWrHuFRIt-g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3HmNT6PmCYOm2gWhiJ2ADA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0DeFWHRt00FrYN_V3RvoN4Gfv2g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14537063</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3HmNT6PmCYOm2gWhiJ2ADA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0DeFWHRt00FrYN_V3RvoN4Gfv2g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7FCNT5iiFuPi2QWE_KXpCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHOi4toAB3TzrnCjTR-X25QJtfEbw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14534926</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7FCNT5iiFuPi2QWE_KXpCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHOi4toAB3TzrnCjTR-X25QJtfEbw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0iWNT_-cKeec2QXe94GMDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwE310WnerlGOWKBFWfMg5iG_lpA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14532241</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0iWNT_-cKeec2QXe94GMDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwE310WnerlGOWKBFWfMg5iG_lpA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-QyNT6TyHMnW2gXXz635Cw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZk1ztMskZEG7U9rvPD8MMFinGMQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14531477</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-QyNT6TyHMnW2gXXz635Cw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZk1ztMskZEG7U9rvPD8MMFinGMQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FvuMT8DlEuLM2AXh-pWYDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhj5B8dh-EmO3fmhomVRdKbXFe-w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14529154</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FvuMT8DlEuLM2AXh-pWYDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhj5B8dh-EmO3fmhomVRdKbXFe-w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IdGMT_7kEorF2QWnreCWDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrTUMAgVF5CFIZh9dwbHmU0riQbA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14519189</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IdGMT_7kEorF2QWnreCWDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrTUMAgVF5CFIZh9dwbHmU0riQbA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sKaMT5X0GOje2QXymI25CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfOVOHOrftAg8YkfOsEPOgqjwl9A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14515654</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sKaMT5X0GOje2QXymI25CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfOVOHOrftAg8YkfOsEPOgqjwl9A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jHyMT9O6E8PQ2AXryojCCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHBOFAVidcZQr1TvQQwmQeR6ftuNg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14511861</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jHyMT9O6E8PQ2AXryojCCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHBOFAVidcZQr1TvQQwmQeR6ftuNg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AGuMT7qHKdK62gWowrXuCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGbrxh941xE0aCeoZ0Umy-bdjcmhQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14510349</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AGuMT7qHKdK62gWowrXuCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGbrxh941xE0aCeoZ0Umy-bdjcmhQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rFKMT5j8OKLe2AXTt5jVCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGM7E08E-aRb3Y1cyrxhO9L0r5Zug" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14506131</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rFKMT5j8OKLe2AXTt5jVCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGM7E08E-aRb3Y1cyrxhO9L0r5Zug&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qjiMT9-iN-fg2wXj-9HGCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9SwdpLU8pGZUNCA8ZomC-fKO0hw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14499993</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qjiMT9-iN-fg2wXj-9HGCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9SwdpLU8pGZUNCA8ZomC-fKO0hw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LiiMT_uUF6Kg2gWsx7zICQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5KphvAAM3Y067CpWwq2IkKm7fnQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14499054</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LiiMT_uUF6Kg2gWsx7zICQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5KphvAAM3Y067CpWwq2IkKm7fnQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0tWLT-WMF8Go2wXcrt3MCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXaCR8cMDHxE1SXE5wNlhjBvj_Pw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14494124</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0tWLT-WMF8Go2wXcrt3MCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXaCR8cMDHxE1SXE5wNlhjBvj_Pw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2bWLT5G4L5S_2QWI6bzUCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGLVC7tP9Mad2iX89hnNWoUjA8fUg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14493269</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2bWLT5G4L5S_2QWI6bzUCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGLVC7tP9Mad2iX89hnNWoUjA8fUg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lKmLT96mLKHF2QWBn4nUCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvaEHT2srTYdc6MhZ4GYxGxszGZw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14492012</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lKmLT96mLKHF2QWBn4nUCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvaEHT2srTYdc6MhZ4GYxGxszGZw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U3-LT8ymHqie2QWq8YXtCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_X5hGD0LpyDr0CBwdY5VjjZAFVQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14482659</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U3-LT8ymHqie2QWq8YXtCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_X5hGD0LpyDr0CBwdY5VjjZAFVQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HVWLT7q7NorD2QW-l-2eCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfqlXbhJnvtrPDWaaQ8HT9dTuA6A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14479020</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HVWLT7q7NorD2QW-l-2eCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfqlXbhJnvtrPDWaaQ8HT9dTuA6A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6SqLT-7dFeOC2AWvy9zbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwVVIaf4E8miXH_ErTdjJ1HcB5jQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14475113</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6SqLT-7dFeOC2AWvy9zbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwVVIaf4E8miXH_ErTdjJ1HcB5jQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=whOLT-nBDeiK2gWHjeDBCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuOaWpqbHo2YL0_szQR4Hl_CpKtQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14472605</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=whOLT-nBDeiK2gWHjeDBCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuOaWpqbHo2YL0_szQR4Hl_CpKtQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FAGLT621DefM2gX195CxCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFI6TrtES4kI_EiquuGfr3I36SdZw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14469283</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FAGLT621DefM2gX195CxCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFI6TrtES4kI_EiquuGfr3I36SdZw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ouiKT6GZNcTO2AXAopX_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHDI5Me6JychtwsRrq0OrGxKaT44Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14462160</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ouiKT6GZNcTO2AXAopX_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHDI5Me6JychtwsRrq0OrGxKaT44Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vtaKT4jhC4Xo2QXzo-DZCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCoPkfVrHg20Ac9UjcWe61m6mZyQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14461105</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vtaKT4jhC4Xo2QXzo-DZCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCoPkfVrHg20Ac9UjcWe61m6mZyQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GYOKT4vaLMji2QXllt21CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE5HzrUnSwdmLOsJq6nJH6T4V6wuw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14456177</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GYOKT4vaLMji2QXllt21CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE5HzrUnSwdmLOsJq6nJH6T4V6wuw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fGWKT5jzHMWC2wWg0MTpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFX_uN3BsxbGGwM59CSD2TWG4YgYw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14454768</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fGWKT5jzHMWC2wWg0MTpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFX_uN3BsxbGGwM59CSD2TWG4YgYw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F1iKT4D8FIKL2AXK973UCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1lDGIJqYCfxfuzj0Rrknc52ZHHw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14453027</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F1iKT4D8FIKL2AXK973UCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1lDGIJqYCfxfuzj0Rrknc52ZHHw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zy6KT6eoNaKK2wXvr9HHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcsrXsYBfh5rvCFNJjA-2BGlxbag" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14443802</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zy6KT6eoNaKK2wXvr9HHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcsrXsYBfh5rvCFNJjA-2BGlxbag&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tAOKT_TbG6TK2AXzs7jKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHIRQaKmizVDyT3Xk7B9Ue5TDmfXQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14440367</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tAOKT_TbG6TK2AXzs7jKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHIRQaKmizVDyT3Xk7B9Ue5TDmfXQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9mJT42cCaeq2QXf1fzYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNETHJRlc2YTAJevjXT6_5yITj5Ikg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14436571</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9mJT42cCaeq2QXf1fzYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNETHJRlc2YTAJevjXT6_5yITj5Ikg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NcSJT6WBFemw2wWwsozACQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0lNzrrN1Zwfqn8vZbI4XWJKHKNQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14434468</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NcSJT6WBFemw2wWwsozACQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0lNzrrN1Zwfqn8vZbI4XWJKHKNQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=u6-JT83_F8TS2QXV79TmCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHetS5lrge6cM7JSWJRcjLQxEnxNg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14431566</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=u6-JT83_F8TS2QXV79TmCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHetS5lrge6cM7JSWJRcjLQxEnxNg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=u5SJT_rqEOng2AWmv838BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvlHup-NZr8rOfnwna4I8A5mTfLg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14423842</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=u5SJT_rqEOng2AWmv838BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvlHup-NZr8rOfnwna4I8A5mTfLg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QYWJT5S_AYPs2QW6uM3cCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuhZ2IonwAXU1ycDTdX_kutE9Hsg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14422960</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QYWJT5S_AYPs2QW6uM3cCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuhZ2IonwAXU1ycDTdX_kutE9Hsg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AzGJT_nLEqfO2gXo-p2zCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2Nms_2CkedyHSjftXyxKB81pSxw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14417907</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AzGJT_nLEqfO2gXo-p2zCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG2Nms_2CkedyHSjftXyxKB81pSxw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IBSJT-PkO6Xs2QW1rrXYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGIlcEFeiA1jBcYD7YpYxi0OlKFzQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14417022</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IBSJT-PkO6Xs2QW1rrXYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGIlcEFeiA1jBcYD7YpYxi0OlKFzQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cAaJT_-sLMPu2gWxnf26CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEn7bUpgGqaW9BMXEJDWquxH3MZAw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14416412</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cAaJT_-sLMPu2gWxnf26CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEn7bUpgGqaW9BMXEJDWquxH3MZAw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VNyIT4fYHbKHsALCwrjTCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYSWyIbXob0V45Jmaj2cjklNdx9g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14412976</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VNyIT4fYHbKHsALCwrjTCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYSWyIbXob0V45Jmaj2cjklNdx9g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NLKIT5nKIqfD2QXPt6WsDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4MlKP4hNAhRm4INnT1VgHCGF0EA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14412876</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NLKIT5nKIqfD2QXPt6WsDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4MlKP4hNAhRm4INnT1VgHCGF0EA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1oeIT7TWJsqOqgHvz4yIDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9k0oJQSWcYF3-xAgR0phY2Kr_JQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14412769</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1oeIT7TWJsqOqgHvz4yIDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9k0oJQSWcYF3-xAgR0phY2Kr_JQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WnOIT-bqIOLy2QXjhdzJBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-MPBFAgAi7y-iJ53ZNdZLShCYJw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14412508</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WnOIT-bqIOLy2QXjhdzJBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-MPBFAgAi7y-iJ53ZNdZLShCYJw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjOIT9eiBILi2QXnhdzcCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEl_ZwF9Qu2kGIfJwudF1z6dST3mg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14407402</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjOIT9eiBILi2QXnhdzcCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEl_ZwF9Qu2kGIfJwudF1z6dST3mg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ABCIT5qsIqec2QWl8aC4CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhL2pNSI4qW9BzhZYwhv0LYd-R8Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14407302</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ABCIT5qsIqec2QWl8aC4CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhL2pNSI4qW9BzhZYwhv0LYd-R8Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0OCHT6myNObK2AXVo_jnCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGpcKdzYIhEPaj8lF3V_idhMl4fLw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14406673</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0OCHT6myNObK2AXVo_jnCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGpcKdzYIhEPaj8lF3V_idhMl4fLw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WsSHT8WdLJCW8gTR5KjICQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHyfEm_FRW_IlTZwtKqLy6ce-0uyg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14404672</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WsSHT8WdLJCW8gTR5KjICQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHyfEm_FRW_IlTZwtKqLy6ce-0uyg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GLWHT-K_OpKc8gTRiNzvCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECby_kmGXmITIjt7p1zLzh-HHIOQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14402615</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GLWHT-K_OpKc8gTRiNzvCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECby_kmGXmITIjt7p1zLzh-HHIOQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zoqHT9fRN6ew8AHU95mbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH6nMg89uA86BIREg9rr5kUsawiSQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14392620</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zoqHT9fRN6ew8AHU95mbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH6nMg89uA86BIREg9rr5kUsawiSQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r2CHT6TtOaGL8AHTrcWbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfjKziBxK9g7zob9mDzRButJFjCA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14389641</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r2CHT6TtOaGL8AHTrcWbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfjKziBxK9g7zob9mDzRButJFjCA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mTaHT8HKKKa18AGB5fWwCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHz2r0Agcy77JpD3_f89vODjFIbsQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14386222</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mTaHT8HKKKa18AGB5fWwCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHz2r0Agcy77JpD3_f89vODjFIbsQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5iKHT7GZD6mq8AGx8dSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYgY8suEIg8ZZ4iX7ocmPDkUFETA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14384643</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5iKHT7GZD6mq8AGx8dSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYgY8suEIg8ZZ4iX7ocmPDkUFETA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Av-GT9SnO8G18AHp-NG6CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGE10XqIz8Qi6ZOoQSd-BvVvGxSaw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14377029</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Av-GT9SnO8G18AHp-NG6CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGE10XqIz8Qi6ZOoQSd-BvVvGxSaw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MeKGT5_OJYaS8AG5sf2VCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKH9TCGPfvB-uNkk83dlWbNSKILg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14373785</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MeKGT5_OJYaS8AG5sf2VCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEKH9TCGPfvB-uNkk83dlWbNSKILg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tLiGT-7LAuW-8AHApPXCCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFGhw_-cSUpN8tJsOpb3Ci3Ek8d8A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14371463</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tLiGT-7LAuW-8AHApPXCCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFGhw_-cSUpN8tJsOpb3Ci3Ek8d8A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fI-GT-CMBKeG8AHoz92TCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGtEGILkaMGEo1YCblAnUGtHybL2A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14369360</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fI-GT-CMBKeG8AHoz92TCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGtEGILkaMGEo1YCblAnUGtHybL2A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=unSGT_vXKcay8AHntcWtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9gXKTv0tBbVUnSYNgkUXRiDjc4w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14369100</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=unSGT_vXKcay8AHntcWtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9gXKTv0tBbVUnSYNgkUXRiDjc4w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nWOGT7-IHoGG8AGRxLi3CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzI4ddMe36kTmgcA_PqFyLMkvKPA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14367100</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nWOGT7-IHoGG8AGRxLi3CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzI4ddMe36kTmgcA_PqFyLMkvKPA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzmGT_abN6qi2QW116mLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFxn6mU0K-P52ILpP7LdlqxeJYyZA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14357471</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzmGT_abN6qi2QW116mLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFxn6mU0K-P52ILpP7LdlqxeJYyZA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GuWFT-W8MIrW2AW-xrDeDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHtlnRq7AZeZB7ZfsjK97bVE__8dQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14350073</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GuWFT-W8MIrW2AW-xrDeDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHtlnRq7AZeZB7ZfsjK97bVE__8dQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZsuFT9yZHOaM2gWqn5j9CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGSx8OLIkOYSAb2vfo0AjiqGHC20A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14347695</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZsuFT9yZHOaM2gWqn5j9CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGSx8OLIkOYSAb2vfo0AjiqGHC20A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ALuFT_GHOq2I8gH51NW-CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZ91vBXtaDf3hbF9V23ddz6XpSeA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14344706</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ALuFT_GHOq2I8gH51NW-CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZ91vBXtaDf3hbF9V23ddz6XpSeA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3JqFT52CDuOh2QWO8tWNCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEESc7OaGZon7o87FfwJzdRtWqCqw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14337333</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3JqFT52CDuOh2QWO8tWNCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEESc7OaGZon7o87FfwJzdRtWqCqw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2JCFT7GhL5OA2AXzjN33CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxrVF5INyuYiV12YunOnwCigQ-Dg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14336499</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2JCFT7GhL5OA2AXzjN33CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxrVF5INyuYiV12YunOnwCigQ-Dg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wmeFT5blHsGo2wXS5fD5CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9TUHggKBj3eViTfgnzizNIdFtYg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14333875</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wmeFT5blHsGo2wXS5fD5CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9TUHggKBj3eViTfgnzizNIdFtYg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wT2FT_CdHOKt8AGV4NSXCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0U6r8pyabwx9FPGUFoxzTMlS1MQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14331357</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wT2FT_CdHOKt8AGV4NSXCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0U6r8pyabwx9FPGUFoxzTMlS1MQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fSCFT7OQI-ae2QXS8PTgCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlrJZkJE77zmWO1b7P1K1cZrYyLQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14330488</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fSCFT7OQI-ae2QXS8PTgCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlrJZkJE77zmWO1b7P1K1cZrYyLQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JRKFT5eBM8fC2wWC1d3hCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGucbgSjV2urukTjFUDcv_-b45I-Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14328498</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JRKFT5eBM8fC2wWC1d3hCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGucbgSjV2urukTjFUDcv_-b45I-Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3OeET5bOAaGM2gXfsoiLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF83WdYPDduBJUFdkLNBfJ5CTaxQg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14318443</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3OeET5bOAaGM2gXfsoiLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF83WdYPDduBJUFdkLNBfJ5CTaxQg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sL2ET5WUEIKa2gXj0KCdCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGRpC6Pyp6Z4alSV7socQAAXt2Y1g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14314829</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sL2ET5WUEIKa2gXj0KCdCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGRpC6Pyp6Z4alSV7socQAAXt2Y1g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aJOET_-CA4jq8wTk_IjECA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXEVCZWXaI-Ett6spcByrnfmWUjw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14311167</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aJOET_-CA4jq8wTk_IjECA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXEVCZWXaI-Ett6spcByrnfmWUjw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8nyET9WXFsG42wWKpvDvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGje42Da3t6koKAHLIP_mHvWzG74A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14309248</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8nyET9WXFsG42wWKpvDvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGje42Da3t6koKAHLIP_mHvWzG74A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mk2ET5yCK4KL2AWIusyCCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFO943yHUAMtPrDPWLV77P1jB563w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14298894</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mk2ET5yCK4KL2AWIusyCCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFO943yHUAMtPrDPWLV77P1jB563w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pj-ET-aQGObc2QWv78HiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSC2TQq47j50oS43Yqc9LUR5RyEQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14298076</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pj-ET-aQGObc2QWv78HiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSC2TQq47j50oS43Yqc9LUR5RyEQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9BaET_e9AoLc2gXVrOH0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGW92GayAsuEfnDh5YzOaTxbOW0Aw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14295580</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9BaET_e9AoLc2gXVrOH0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGW92GayAsuEfnDh5YzOaTxbOW0Aw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eeyDT9GdA4b42gWO7LWWCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4QZGbK2ulaWfjn-9uuFhx2cVhpg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14293011</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eeyDT9GdA4b42gWO7LWWCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4QZGbK2ulaWfjn-9uuFhx2cVhpg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tdCDT6eSIufg2QXihMn4CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5BYIMRoSSkgUpgaitQQFS-4r1BA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14292766</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tdCDT6eSIufg2QXihMn4CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF5BYIMRoSSkgUpgaitQQFS-4r1BA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YMCDT9aTCLSA2QXfmrj7CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHomNN8eB7ByRV9VSy1dRmcEWXSog" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14291939</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YMCDT9aTCLSA2QXfmrj7CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHomNN8eB7ByRV9VSy1dRmcEWXSog&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KpaDT4fDDKGW2AXJoZiUCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEXrUhRBxfYMwjpShud_oHhZ83P1A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14288684</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KpaDT4fDDKGW2AXJoZiUCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEXrUhRBxfYMwjpShud_oHhZ83P1A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7muDT-yIKIeC2AXhqvGECA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrfSC3A7lFHFrKLo0YCaT1DzUbYQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14288579</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7muDT-yIKIeC2AXhqvGECA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrfSC3A7lFHFrKLo0YCaT1DzUbYQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qEGDT-bvLtG42gXb4bCKBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHS5_owyDtnb7BJdWtOfsQowyC7gg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14288487</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qEGDT-bvLtG42gXb4bCKBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHS5_owyDtnb7BJdWtOfsQowyC7gg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vxeDT_e6Gua42wWSzbnkBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF82CVAmgnBvifQjx08q2WHkIbGFg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14287695</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vxeDT_e6Gua42wWSzbnkBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF82CVAmgnBvifQjx08q2WHkIbGFg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oO2CT8TxDKbK2AXs1ZX7Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIGMX8iC3-crafQ_G5DnXVY7Lu1g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14281914</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oO2CT8TxDKbK2AXs1ZX7Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIGMX8iC3-crafQ_G5DnXVY7Lu1g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=s8SCT4GtDYSE2QW0ucmQBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEEu-fMsSzZAKA4ikSqG_9CE5qGxA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14279572</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=s8SCT4GtDYSE2QW0ucmQBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEEu-fMsSzZAKA4ikSqG_9CE5qGxA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zZmCT_XUG6qw2QWMw_zjBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJ73DoSOKfJ_82dlUbqjVh7dNLbA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14277406</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zZmCT_XUG6qw2QWMw_zjBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJ73DoSOKfJ_82dlUbqjVh7dNLbA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZICCT8S6O6jo2QX115T8Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFAkWzF3XxObdIcYW6CGeNGU9Em5w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14277189</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZICCT8S6O6jo2QX115T8Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFAkWzF3XxObdIcYW6CGeNGU9Em5w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=226CT767O-mo2wXQ1bD6Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGlMtIJk_OeFqrBL4qvxM3vNzKwjQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14276408</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=226CT767O-mo2wXQ1bD6Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGlMtIJk_OeFqrBL4qvxM3vNzKwjQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r0SCT7PCEOfM2gWbpYziBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7zd8ep7pkosTtg9k0IwtQ9cLkTQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14267415</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r0SCT7PCEOfM2gWbpYziBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7zd8ep7pkosTtg9k0IwtQ9cLkTQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cRqCT5GpAYHG2wXaiLycBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfAbk1k9pzcK4Cu3OntXsHaAA4_A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14264107</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cRqCT5GpAYHG2wXaiLycBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfAbk1k9pzcK4Cu3OntXsHaAA4_A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R9GBT8yrDabc2QX-z_DrBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG984GL-L9RulOHNWllY-iu73WUwQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14256476</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R9GBT8yrDabc2QX-z_DrBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG984GL-L9RulOHNWllY-iu73WUwQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fyyBT_a4IOru2gXDzajoBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFDPVJ29AEHijx-pYUSDdl15aevw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14240386</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fyyBT_a4IOru2gXDzajoBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFDPVJ29AEHijx-pYUSDdl15aevw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wvOAT9TwCMTe2QXA0pzvBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEf67DswmRc2jVv6EUA6xNKqghErQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14229484</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wvOAT9TwCMTe2QXA0pzvBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEf67DswmRc2jVv6EUA6xNKqghErQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eoeAT4_gKqPQ2AWpsoydBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFLr4qCdN_pygiJ6F-cvq2Vf_NJw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14219917</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eoeAT4_gKqPQ2AWpsoydBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFLr4qCdN_pygiJ6F-cvq2Vf_NJw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZEqAT4jwC8GC2AWy88CSBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEyQMotCDi6S8xq029GYnqP5aLzQA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14208983</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZEqAT4jwC8GC2AWy88CSBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEyQMotCDi6S8xq029GYnqP5aLzQA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VCKAT-HuEYTy2QWHhODvBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFD-7JBCkD2s1rQc_ka6iCdrbN5Rw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14206156</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VCKAT-HuEYTy2QWHhODvBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFD-7JBCkD2s1rQc_ka6iCdrbN5Rw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tfZ_T6OmJIag2QWqxb3kBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtTaddeRPDBSVX_YTvGW-Rw6P_kw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14203711</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tfZ_T6OmJIag2QWqxb3kBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtTaddeRPDBSVX_YTvGW-Rw6P_kw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZN5_T4_uMIPC2wXO36zuBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlZXIqbey-nQ8COVa95O1orwL3VQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14202072</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZN5_T4_uMIPC2wXO36zuBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlZXIqbey-nQ8COVa95O1orwL3VQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z8t_T6WoA4-SgQei9dCBCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9YfoOdkt7a23pHopVH8HsR-7zcw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14200065</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z8t_T6WoA4-SgQei9dCBCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9YfoOdkt7a23pHopVH8HsR-7zcw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zqF_T431MqGM2gWVyNH6Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQKBxloXoJfyVip-aidSdkJHtglw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14190579</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zqF_T431MqGM2gWVyNH6Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHQKBxloXoJfyVip-aidSdkJHtglw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=X3d_T_XoEemY2wWKsLCLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE3mfTCthSQ5A3ffMoDbhsfsFRunA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14187110</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=X3d_T_XoEemY2wWKsLCLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE3mfTCthSQ5A3ffMoDbhsfsFRunA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QE1_T87oDoiS9QSU0PjqBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiQvFUB2AnC4jxpxDro1lzP9uTjw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14183737</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QE1_T87oDoiS9QSU0PjqBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiQvFUB2AnC4jxpxDro1lzP9uTjw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8zR_T4-YM4PM9QTe98n3Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCn34XYeZrpgIHdwRlSNC7ssobpQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14181495</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8zR_T4-YM4PM9QTe98n3Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCn34XYeZrpgIHdwRlSNC7ssobpQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DyR_T8_0JKa42wXlwKWFBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFS415Iej1JAzbO56n_g3-ASl5Ytw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14177973</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DyR_T8_0JKa42wXlwKWFBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFS415Iej1JAzbO56n_g3-ASl5Ytw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8vh-T5-qOLPE2QWCvYTnBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH7JRCePdFtQo6HbDgKAhokwKuAdw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14170832</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8vh-T5-qOLPE2QWCvYTnBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH7JRCePdFtQo6HbDgKAhokwKuAdw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=585-T_OfIoOq2QXxtrzoBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9Dx7FEfz9YaFhNOfeRrkmr-G9_w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14168244</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=585-T_OfIoOq2QXxtrzoBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9Dx7FEfz9YaFhNOfeRrkmr-G9_w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yaR-T5HOB8WU2QXvpOCLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXMKM7SePnF3w-D8AZudRgZGdfCQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14165840</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yaR-T5HOB8WU2QXvpOCLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXMKM7SePnF3w-D8AZudRgZGdfCQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eIp-T9KWJImk8ATyj-G0Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH41_ENRwvLAeVBrDrT_NyWOW701w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14165628</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eIp-T9KWJImk8ATyj-G0Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH41_ENRwvLAeVBrDrT_NyWOW701w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pnp-T8GfLIqE8ASkrNTKBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGY14qPLSz3q5JBxxnt0wujOsTvdQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14164753</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pnp-T8GfLIqE8ASkrNTKBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGY14qPLSz3q5JBxxnt0wujOsTvdQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EVB-T9qmIYGg9QT8nIm3Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFqqFAEqtyXjDUrpiyIAKBvr8usdQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14155725</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EVB-T9qmIYGg9QT8nIm3Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFqqFAEqtyXjDUrpiyIAKBvr8usdQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1CV-T5XrM4Ki8QSd5pSNDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWyIRXeHLM1efKu8OW60HAOOYqrQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14152117</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1CV-T5XrM4Ki8QSd5pSNDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWyIRXeHLM1efKu8OW60HAOOYqrQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oft9T2WTgvEEmvmNiQ4&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmd4LjEPLqJVs0CUEc03XQVD-RQA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14147577</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oft9T2WTgvEEmvmNiQ4&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmd4LjEPLqJVs0CUEc03XQVD-RQA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2t99T8nrC4WE8ATZ8YzrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFB43TY-pWdsn6tkDyHLuRQ__eeHA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14144954</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2t99T8nrC4WE8ATZ8YzrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFB43TY-pWdsn6tkDyHLuRQ__eeHA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Qad9T5TBH4nI2AXm05z0DA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEi4YdqajDGyl41ETXmEIr0ZF7aHw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14133823</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Qad9T5TBH4nI2AXm05z0DA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEi4YdqajDGyl41ETXmEIr0ZF7aHw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4qJ9T4aHDuqi2gWnsbGHDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFp6Lwr8fplcdBdo42HrYwtcwrK8g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14133338</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4qJ9T4aHDuqi2gWnsbGHDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFp6Lwr8fplcdBdo42HrYwtcwrK8g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-H99T8vJOcOO2wX3jbXkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGsnP_3hD0PA0VtxY0Gesc1wPM7og" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14130382</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-H99T8vJOcOO2wX3jbXkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGsnP_3hD0PA0VtxY0Gesc1wPM7og&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QVN9T-eGD8GC2AWZ6rmADQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFyMyGt1Y04h5wFLYsm7kFxCL3OWw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14127621</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QVN9T-eGD8GC2AWZ6rmADQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFyMyGt1Y04h5wFLYsm7kFxCL3OWw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LDp9T-6eHo-62gWy5MjrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXXE0-BMOBBXEISPnSfmlJGpELzQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14127409</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LDp9T-6eHo-62gWy5MjrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXXE0-BMOBBXEISPnSfmlJGpELzQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tCh9T6DQL-bc2QWwhPiKDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFOHwU5mdOAZLLOfQW42zJ2CSYT-g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14125626</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tCh9T6DQL-bc2QWwhPiKDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFOHwU5mdOAZLLOfQW42zJ2CSYT-g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jf58T7rbCY-c8QTiwsSKDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGL6yCxmO-bXc8vD4pF-0e2n6-s3g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14115980</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jf58T7rbCY-c8QTiwsSKDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGL6yCxmO-bXc8vD4pF-0e2n6-s3g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pNR8T8zNB4PO9ASdodmiDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKIK44IMBzKrXBNou3g3lnOz8LXQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14112864</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pNR8T8zNB4PO9ASdodmiDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKIK44IMBzKrXBNou3g3lnOz8LXQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=H6p8T72sLKnM2AXg5Y3aDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDBVvd3NC2MQQYHJ5CO9rQWjX5Ow" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14109076</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=H6p8T72sLKnM2AXg5Y3aDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDBVvd3NC2MQQYHJ5CO9rQWjX5Ow&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jo98T9eJCqGK2gXR5d3rDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdDZd5uRZzF-UuS7n_gfaCZjoDZw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14106518</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jo98T9eJCqGK2gXR5d3rDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdDZd5uRZzF-UuS7n_gfaCZjoDZw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HIB8T-f7NKrM2AWltfHVDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEbPFovDcr-8SUM5kZ582EsaNzq3A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14104173</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HIB8T-f7NKrM2AWltfHVDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEbPFovDcr-8SUM5kZ582EsaNzq3A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=u1d8T6u9G-eW2AW7vL3bDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHY3MHgJLPg4WskjkHVPWL1FisN1A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14094834</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=u1d8T6u9G-eW2AW7vL3bDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHY3MHgJLPg4WskjkHVPWL1FisN1A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wFV8T4bWCKaC2AXKhcjRDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE6NWvoTkAXCk-UngbB-jpbpono2w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14094570</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wFV8T4bWCKaC2AXKhcjRDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE6NWvoTkAXCk-UngbB-jpbpono2w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PCx8T4mADsGo2wXP6tHeDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbk8xpXOlZcAV57ORHEU3We7VOqg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14091343</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PCx8T4mADsGo2wXP6tHeDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbk8xpXOlZcAV57ORHEU3We7VOqg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RAJ8T6O_Jcng2QWt_53cDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH6laGQ6aBSHVrutPHldar6yN_0YQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14088970</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RAJ8T6O_Jcng2QWt_53cDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH6laGQ6aBSHVrutPHldar6yN_0YQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Euh7T9n-JsLQ2AXpvZjqDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNXKhJKAHGYcINzJEYxmJPl_b0Fw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14088776</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Euh7T9n-JsLQ2AXpvZjqDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNXKhJKAHGYcINzJEYxmJPl_b0Fw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Qdd7T-XIF8fC2wW6gKnrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFe8Ci_MAHmEka5FHIWPmiYK81j2Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14087895</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Qdd7T-XIF8fC2wW6gKnrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFe8Ci_MAHmEka5FHIWPmiYK81j2Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Bq17T_-2J8TC2wWMjcGfAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHEkMKKgPD6HPPOV7pP6TN52nqvew" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14084105</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Bq17T_-2J8TC2wWMjcGfAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHEkMKKgPD6HPPOV7pP6TN52nqvew&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wIJ7T6DvM4my2QWCvvmsAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGX_4brhVm5uy1_FVebksMC0K1Y8Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14083988</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wIJ7T6DvM4my2QWCvvmsAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGX_4brhVm5uy1_FVebksMC0K1Y8Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rlh7T63HMvSCsAL09KmJAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8_o6rHPEzGhrJnM4xWJE1Uh13bA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14083869</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rlh7T63HMvSCsAL09KmJAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE8_o6rHPEzGhrJnM4xWJE1Uh13bA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aUh7T7ejJLTq2wWakZSTAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1W_VvRlkhhcisKoZrCPCgKTbNnA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14083695</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aUh7T7ejJLTq2wWakZSTAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1W_VvRlkhhcisKoZrCPCgKTbNnA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=di57T5P2LurM2gXXqYCGAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQ68kpvlHldx4QGUml7GzFEAasLQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14082824</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=di57T5P2LurM2gXXqYCGAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQ68kpvlHldx4QGUml7GzFEAasLQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XQR7T77wFYqGsAK16ZGTAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNETPKnEycjDQb3VDQjxjohzrLfyhw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14077094</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XQR7T77wFYqGsAK16ZGTAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNETPKnEycjDQb3VDQjxjohzrLfyhw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vNp6T7DPG-vMsQKepcH8Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlo7wPS5QmMyc4PDc6jXEXnprVUA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14076351</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vNp6T7DPG-vMsQKepcH8Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFlo7wPS5QmMyc4PDc6jXEXnprVUA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cLF6T_3UNaHKsQL02-D8Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPCbaXsAswKxUKDnE7KJCHG2Wt_w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14074788</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cLF6T_3UNaHKsQL02-D8Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPCbaXsAswKxUKDnE7KJCHG2Wt_w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F6J6T_GCHqnIsQLbj9SCAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEB5o_cuLyn0B8rFbYc0axLMgu4NQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14073931</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F6J6T_GCHqnIsQLbj9SCAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEB5o_cuLyn0B8rFbYc0axLMgu4NQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wYV6T9mMH9P82gW7q7CqAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4iCqKAnavnd1ZB9earhQWBpOZlg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14070975</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wYV6T9mMH9P82gW7q7CqAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4iCqKAnavnd1ZB9earhQWBpOZlg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pFt6T9m-Gon02QWEvsyfAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGprReUH5-cICrXljJqHdV6_EcUTg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14061844</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pFt6T9m-Gon02QWEvsyfAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGprReUH5-cICrXljJqHdV6_EcUTg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bzF6T-qxNYrgsQLZ3Oj0Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHstOY07b3Pwj5P_kaAeBx2K29ULw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14059201</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bzF6T-qxNYrgsQLZ3Oj0Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHstOY07b3Pwj5P_kaAeBx2K29ULw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Twd6T6CaH4ei2wXSvs21Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYFAwgmJ8EK3FRZcxX5C910YGbiQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14056337</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Twd6T6CaH4ei2wXSvs21Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYFAwgmJ8EK3FRZcxX5C910YGbiQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9Ph5T-2hEamw2wWZ04G2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFnYN1CrXjNplZWolHoQSO8IBJ0lw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14055326</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9Ph5T-2hEamw2wWZ04G2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFnYN1CrXjNplZWolHoQSO8IBJ0lw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C915T_CzI6OYsQK3gsxp&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFV3gVyFBRk7RGv_URvCLRYNW77Hg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14051763</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C915T_CzI6OYsQK3gsxp&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFV3gVyFBRk7RGv_URvCLRYNW77Hg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XcJ5T4qKNYfm2QXnxLS2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnWUamY4_DbTHRFXxqnyAatfsaGg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14045383</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XcJ5T4qKNYfm2QXnxLS2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnWUamY4_DbTHRFXxqnyAatfsaGg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6rJ5T9_dFOTi2AWd2u21Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNErt5L_5SbsDQopBnwjWx-tn5dZAQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14044603</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6rJ5T9_dFOTi2AWd2u21Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNErt5L_5SbsDQopBnwjWx-tn5dZAQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=w4h5T4vZHqOFsgLmrcihBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEb6hKAYQyNmbipHQWM3BryWjzkSQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14041810</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=w4h5T4vZHqOFsgLmrcihBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEb6hKAYQyNmbipHQWM3BryWjzkSQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gV55T7jJHoSDsgLv8pmiBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHUH95azEfvT06eQ7ybR90OCp0hjw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14039701</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gV55T7jJHoSDsgLv8pmiBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHUH95azEfvT06eQ7ybR90OCp0hjw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=E0J5T66lD4Sc2AXC_uW1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXdNQzVDoEAynv8U6sF14NHxsboQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14039507</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=E0J5T66lD4Sc2AXC_uW1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXdNQzVDoEAynv8U6sF14NHxsboQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OTR5T__eFO3KsQLutfGhBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE91V9wO5ulx7fTy2XkKu9i7ipswQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14038675</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OTR5T__eFO3KsQLutfGhBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE91V9wO5ulx7fTy2XkKu9i7ipswQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Dgp5T5y3LY_KsQKLm4SiBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQTJJDKMQgUt88rTfL7kocAkxnsg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14031265</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Dgp5T5y3LY_KsQKLm4SiBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQTJJDKMQgUt88rTfL7kocAkxnsg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5d94T5b2O6yK2QWN2eC1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjvuYkkAcGHs3uoUEg5QZQHMilOQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14027982</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5d94T5b2O6yK2QWN2eC1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjvuYkkAcGHs3uoUEg5QZQHMilOQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uLV4T_2vJMma2gWMwZS2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG67RBoqftVjjPFPZnJ5VOOBqKSBg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14023173</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uLV4T_2vJMma2gWMwZS2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG67RBoqftVjjPFPZnJ5VOOBqKSBg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vpp4T7asBqTE2gWFzqm2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFoYcpZSYCaMO68NaYQ6NjBJOxcZA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14020208</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vpp4T7asBqTE2gWFzqm2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFoYcpZSYCaMO68NaYQ6NjBJOxcZA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fIt4T7PpB6PL2QWBr8y1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrZhkq3BGkqAXp_NF80tMV8Lk9Hw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14018020</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fIt4T7PpB6PL2QWBr8y1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrZhkq3BGkqAXp_NF80tMV8Lk9Hw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M2J4T7bcLcbF2QWr_Yi3Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPvz8SUMk_J0vG96CzzuubjfROHQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14008558</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M2J4T7bcLcbF2QWr_Yi3Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPvz8SUMk_J0vG96CzzuubjfROHQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=T2F4T6qBEaLo2QXF2cy2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-sz_nsgCcgeqjsjcnGX3s9GFeDA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14008391</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=T2F4T6qBEaLo2QXF2cy2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-sz_nsgCcgeqjsjcnGX3s9GFeDA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FDh4T5iPEoHL2QXNoPC1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHW9fuZ1jJSGXY1WrqY5cmFU-v3Vg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14005067</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FDh4T5iPEoHL2QXNoPC1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHW9fuZ1jJSGXY1WrqY5cmFU-v3Vg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pg94T5TiHIGK2gXWocm1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKBx1Qf7dAoCd9yZwHlFqyb5oCNQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14002790</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pg94T5TiHIGK2gXWocm1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKBx1Qf7dAoCd9yZwHlFqyb5oCNQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1PN3T4nXOcSksQLGq4iiBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHX8i2n-vMRKx3Sfb1EmpIzrTqp9A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14002575</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1PN3T4nXOcSksQLGq4iiBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHX8i2n-vMRKx3Sfb1EmpIzrTqp9A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zuJ3T_DMNMT-sQKM9cChBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGDQwruUSTm_1TdTwpchtzBDJT9Ag" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/14001742</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zuJ3T_DMNMT-sQKM9cChBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGDQwruUSTm_1TdTwpchtzBDJT9Ag&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4bh3T_GpF8-msALfhuSgBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1Lr0RFFOZjzWK5vj9VSxKb2AUhA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13993995</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4bh3T_GpF8-msALfhuSgBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1Lr0RFFOZjzWK5vj9VSxKb2AUhA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=skh3T7zpLMarsALR7-n8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-bmjMhhbDRYBIQfISAgtLK7rgkQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13982686</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=skh3T7zpLMarsALR7-n8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-bmjMhhbDRYBIQfISAgtLK7rgkQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yQ93T8GuGqX42gXv4LS1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHc_-3gHqZScUy3NsVnZ0Yy-hsCbw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13971379</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yQ93T8GuGqX42gXv4LS1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHc_-3gHqZScUy3NsVnZ0Yy-hsCbw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cOZ2T968LYGO2AXnx5S2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFcZ07cbaHpSHTbSr2Uhmv-cshm_w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13967807</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cOZ2T968LYGO2AXnx5S2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFcZ07cbaHpSHTbSr2Uhmv-cshm_w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rLt2T6CCCqeq2QXW6ty1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFor-qBRAapflwN7fb6SuKL1283EQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13965272</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rLt2T6CCCqeq2QXW6ty1Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFor-qBRAapflwN7fb6SuKL1283EQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oqF2T77kB8WwsgKnnKmhBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH2kEOYWcvrzKK6QEZGCJHJ22gGnQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13965049</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oqF2T77kB8WwsgKnnKmhBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH2kEOYWcvrzKK6QEZGCJHJ22gGnQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Bj12T43jK6jA2gX1uoSqDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNETsK8tRzvgcOBw7wWiD_8VRmQnuw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13951942</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Bj12T43jK6jA2gX1uoSqDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNETsK8tRzvgcOBw7wWiD_8VRmQnuw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tRJ2T8CEEIWQ2AW2opm6DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnQ65G_9D6RZBBqP_hpOxUNBpLaQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13946741</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tRJ2T8CEEIWQ2AW2opm6DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnQ65G_9D6RZBBqP_hpOxUNBpLaQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Fvh1T8CkFqjg2AWn4dm9DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNET5e-pYG5R3qAH2wgYZ_Bgn7Bamw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13943909</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Fvh1T8CkFqjg2AWn4dm9DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNET5e-pYG5R3qAH2wgYZ_Bgn7Bamw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ck91T529J9Pq2wXSuOWuDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPdexP7HFxCZBAuOYlis4tVAoa2g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13924754</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ck91T529J9Pq2wXSuOWuDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPdexP7HFxCZBAuOYlis4tVAoa2g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aad0T_OTA-qU2QWPxoDrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG5WqpTXNK6EMhxdT2iXA1Y1oxa0A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13904683</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aad0T_OTA-qU2QWPxoDrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG5WqpTXNK6EMhxdT2iXA1Y1oxa0A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qP1zT73dFuiY2wXmgInkDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFL2lo_v9UJjEW9yRS6nJvDexwOyw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13885077</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qP1zT73dFuiY2wXmgInkDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFL2lo_v9UJjEW9yRS6nJvDexwOyw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pVVzT-m7JKTK2AX4zYHHDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHM5YWxHNTVa14yEfwwCBS3Tt3UA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13866603</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pVVzT-m7JKTK2AX4zYHHDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHM5YWxHNTVa14yEfwwCBS3Tt3UA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6qtyT8b7Mqa22gX5t-DRDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEU_VByEEp6IsCuBeklZd6bTfSd7A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13846406</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6qtyT8b7Mqa22gX5t-DRDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEU_VByEEp6IsCuBeklZd6bTfSd7A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EARyT8u4JMmL2AWdrLTcDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvYKlwyp9yqEJXc6SeeQ1qKsYkwA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13829756</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EARyT8u4JMmL2AWdrLTcDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvYKlwyp9yqEJXc6SeeQ1qKsYkwA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RVlxT8D4E4GY2AWzlL34Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHcKylq9h_uHJSNeyOlqUDdW6cEg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13809701</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RVlxT8D4E4GY2AWzlL34Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHcKylq9h_uHJSNeyOlqUDdW6cEg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KCFxT_GKLKmPsQL4uoDgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGlYJMBtUUdQ_Uch2EEWz6XbAA6eQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13801416</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
H.R. 4147: ChiPACC Act of 2011. 112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide States an option to cover a children&amp;#39;s program of all-inclusive coordinated care (ChiPACC) under the Medicaid Program.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KCFxT_GKLKmPsQL4uoDgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGlYJMBtUUdQ_Uch2EEWz6XbAA6eQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LPdwT_zRAubC2wXaj-HGDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFkEkZhHTNmHZ868FdPhA7dF2fb6g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13797459</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
H.R. 4147: ChiPACC Act of 2011. 112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide States an option to cover a children&amp;#39;s program of all-inclusive coordinated care (ChiPACC) under the Medicaid Program.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LPdwT_zRAubC2wXaj-HGDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFkEkZhHTNmHZ868FdPhA7dF2fb6g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=28xwT8uUKqjg2AXZp5XxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFsOCUjIoSYEJiBTt9yVnMGXJT8qw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13792470</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
H.R. 4147: ChiPACC Act of 2011. 112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide States an option to cover a children&amp;#39;s program of all-inclusive coordinated care (ChiPACC) under the Medicaid Program.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=28xwT8uUKqjg2AXZp5XxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFsOCUjIoSYEJiBTt9yVnMGXJT8qw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fLRwT4a3Eqqw2wX1opRp&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF6wteytIaXPNda3m8CpuUrCYkDXA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13789923</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fLRwT4a3Eqqw2wX1opRp&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF6wteytIaXPNda3m8CpuUrCYkDXA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v6JwT5TTPOOg2gXc6qXxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4U_BRbIOapCZIrm9rVeDMT6lUrA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13787332</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
H.R. 4147: ChiPACC Act of 2011. 112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide States an option to cover a children&amp;#39;s program of all-inclusive coordinated care (ChiPACC) under the Medicaid Program.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v6JwT5TTPOOg2gXc6qXxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4U_BRbIOapCZIrm9rVeDMT6lUrA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=enhwT9SYBKjy2QWw7s2iCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG8prKkCZEvx2Z18RL48Rr_9l4rOQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13776908</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
H.R. 4147: ChiPACC Act of 2011. 112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide States an option to cover a children&amp;#39;s program of all-inclusive coordinated care (ChiPACC) under the Medicaid Program.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=enhwT9SYBKjy2QWw7s2iCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG8prKkCZEvx2Z18RL48Rr_9l4rOQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2nZwT6uxK-WxsgLas_zyBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG1rHOcD3ahvhpahnUKB8_Mz79YjA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13776671</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
H.R. 4147: ChiPACC Act of 2011. 112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide States an option to cover a children&amp;#39;s program of all-inclusive coordinated care (ChiPACC) under the Medicaid Program.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2nZwT6uxK-WxsgLas_zyBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG1rHOcD3ahvhpahnUKB8_Mz79YjA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eFBwT_PKBOOi2wXvyrHxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHarmgvj4nKj6rLdUrzEiY6FGGKdA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13773860</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
H.R. 4147: ChiPACC Act of 2011. 112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide States an option to cover a children&amp;#39;s program of all-inclusive coordinated care (ChiPACC) under the Medicaid Program.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eFBwT_PKBOOi2wXvyrHxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHarmgvj4nKj6rLdUrzEiY6FGGKdA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3iRwT7OiI_DHsQK9vaD4BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFziva0stbYHZbn3XuGnGAVs4mh0Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13771356</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
H.R. 4147: ChiPACC Act of 2011. 112th Congress, 2011&#8211;2012. To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide States an option to cover a children&amp;#39;s program of all-inclusive coordinated care (ChiPACC) under the Medicaid Program.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3iRwT7OiI_DHsQK9vaD4BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFziva0stbYHZbn3XuGnGAVs4mh0Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ewhwT53aAaiEsALZhoCIBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9xOU4Nef35oP_bEp8vD5s0EWpNg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13771093</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ewhwT53aAaiEsALZhoCIBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9xOU4Nef35oP_bEp8vD5s0EWpNg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_FtvT-x-6_7ZBeq5lfIB&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9em2yBwFOHftOeqpzYjqpu667iA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13754427</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_FtvT-x-6_7ZBeq5lfIB&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9em2yBwFOHftOeqpzYjqpu667iA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LbluT4KQIaW02wXPm6XyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFDrIzIjxj17gj2LDsfS2fJkthGlw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13735248</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LbluT4KQIaW02wXPm6XyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFDrIzIjxj17gj2LDsfS2fJkthGlw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HApuT-fPEKei2wW037zxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1GelQYRene1lNKhrixdeoTDL4Ng" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13715488</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HApuT-fPEKei2wW037zxAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1GelQYRene1lNKhrixdeoTDL4Ng&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6GVtT_79M_T4sQKRq_33BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEp5bG_LnOIglx55wi27rCw294utw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13697521</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6GVtT_79M_T4sQKRq_33BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEp5bG_LnOIglx55wi27rCw294utw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-MlsT4mxE-eOsALlu-yOBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFr0L80OcgUENOriHZwIMZeADs8RQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13676988</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-MlsT4mxE-eOsALlu-yOBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFr0L80OcgUENOriHZwIMZeADs8RQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0hdsT7iPDIr1sQLG6cXtBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzPbr4fpjyj4AQFlxYckwhRHObwQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13655781</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0hdsT7iPDIr1sQLG6cXtBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzPbr4fpjyj4AQFlxYckwhRHObwQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=c3prT_bvF-OwsgKL-Kz0BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbr0FG39rSerCJNbXNVaDO8lNZqw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13635057</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=c3prT_bvF-OwsgKL-Kz0BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbr0FG39rSerCJNbXNVaDO8lNZqw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QMBqT5HrCu6CsgLAy_TvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEyQCVdcWWDWEZTz0Se5iVmoRP6_w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13612777</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QMBqT5HrCu6CsgLAy_TvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEyQCVdcWWDWEZTz0Se5iVmoRP6_w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WTVqT8UZjKqwAsjLiYsJ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjzNbaHB9xGCs_dxAl9cIj5Had8g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13594106</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WTVqT8UZjKqwAsjLiYsJ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjzNbaHB9xGCs_dxAl9cIj5Had8g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IyJqT8bfKqiQsAKI2cClCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEP11ysD22EcvN72r7YObAMHAumUA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13591858</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=IyJqT8bfKqiQsAKI2cClCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEP11ysD22EcvN72r7YObAMHAumUA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WgtqT-iUOuGtsQLYmtWbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEChc2NPuhmCp45sCMJrK0lll6zjQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13588401</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WgtqT-iUOuGtsQLYmtWbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEChc2NPuhmCp45sCMJrK0lll6zjQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9OBpT87BB-Ww2wWJ_cXwCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEw7-FesWnei-2h6c61gfGo1V-Nag" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13577650</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9OBpT87BB-Ww2wWJ_cXwCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEw7-FesWnei-2h6c61gfGo1V-Nag&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UtVpT8nlOsKs2gWzsp3uCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHf4IBOw_WgqFKHnlSGddduJIAqng" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13576461</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UtVpT8nlOsKs2gWzsp3uCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHf4IBOw_WgqFKHnlSGddduJIAqng&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tYxpT87bMIPgsQKj9KmHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjXwpjJDhRwy9W_yBn23v_bXGz1g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13570729</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tYxpT87bMIPgsQKj9KmHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjXwpjJDhRwy9W_yBn23v_bXGz1g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BXRpT_2yKqbe2AXjttCGCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFt5Ul5ON3rgAG17mpahaj7yq0I9w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13570420</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BXRpT_2yKqbe2AXjttCGCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFt5Ul5ON3rgAG17mpahaj7yq0I9w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bWJpT4-2C-TosQKh7bCbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGIkkj1hbjukCDcIkqGCL3iNOhTkw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13569359</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bWJpT4-2C-TosQKh7bCbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGIkkj1hbjukCDcIkqGCL3iNOhTkw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MThpT5nUJ4HKsQLLhNChCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFIo1IpfG9ZSga85DrfjFGzciUd7w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13560691</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MThpT5nUJ4HKsQLLhNChCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFIo1IpfG9ZSga85DrfjFGzciUd7w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8w1pT9uHOqWesQLCibiPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqNY8G2m-78pA-OEFmH6zrFK58HQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13556503</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8w1pT9uHOqWesQLCibiPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqNY8G2m-78pA-OEFmH6zrFK58HQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zeNoT_6AEMOOsQLO2uSPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE2kfFiRxqmUQFSfQjWoNGOf24Ddw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13551864</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zeNoT_6AEMOOsQLO2uSPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE2kfFiRxqmUQFSfQjWoNGOf24Ddw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7MloT4bDJLDjsQKDhtySCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH43osvFCa82gZYNsE-GV13wLzfpg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13548613</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7MloT4bDJLDjsQKDhtySCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH43osvFCa82gZYNsE-GV13wLzfpg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3LloT52WBKLosQKMk8yqCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7i6Mq_cfneN7T5uEWnuU-qtRTMg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13546001</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3LloT52WBKLosQKMk8yqCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7i6Mq_cfneN7T5uEWnuU-qtRTMg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bI9oT9G3O432sQKzptSFCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFtemWZPrc9ll1bbeKvqSIbjDLpbA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13535347</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bI9oT9G3O432sQKzptSFCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFtemWZPrc9ll1bbeKvqSIbjDLpbA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=94FoT4azCuWW2AXy_K37CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHFRGYnMUDcEtvou-hwZoCrnQ9PpQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13533831</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=94FoT4azCuWW2AXy_K37CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHFRGYnMUDcEtvou-hwZoCrnQ9PpQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6mhoT4SyOoXfsQKPsZSXCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGdcMLVNoDB-AZ2NRHb1N6NCr4MTw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13531664</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6mhoT4SyOoXfsQKPsZSXCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGdcMLVNoDB-AZ2NRHb1N6NCr4MTw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GTtoT5_rO4qO2wWT172LCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEPX4m2iYJ8-YdN8R8AivHDiELV1A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13528090</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GTtoT5_rO4qO2wWT172LCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEPX4m2iYJ8-YdN8R8AivHDiELV1A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=niFoT87UCOL-sQK3tqykCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLATMu7J8okI6tJEaJLlALYmxEcw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13527825</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=niFoT87UCOL-sQK3tqykCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLATMu7J8okI6tJEaJLlALYmxEcw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xBoT_OXPIGvsgLfytmHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGspZe56kiRdGJDQmKLvAfo9UaVeQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13526948</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xBoT_OXPIGvsgLfytmHCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGspZe56kiRdGJDQmKLvAfo9UaVeQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-ZnT7KjCsiJsQKnwoyuCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsH92KA9nKxkDuHM_EHEOBGy3pfg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13518012</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-ZnT7KjCsiJsQKnwoyuCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsH92KA9nKxkDuHM_EHEOBGy3pfg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gbxnT5DfCKT_sQL0xcGcCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhkkeE2wmf5GRTVc046j2Q2kKSSA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13513744</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gbxnT5DfCKT_sQL0xcGcCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhkkeE2wmf5GRTVc046j2Q2kKSSA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UpJnT9HFIIyqsALIy4mLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhlQzYZu7Oj1_9F-4z7j3IBLDXng" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13509280</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UpJnT9HFIIyqsALIy4mLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhlQzYZu7Oj1_9F-4z7j3IBLDXng&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wnZnT7aMOqmDsgKOio23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqBD_UYVXLe02dSXfk9mj2BMob_w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13506040</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wnZnT7aMOqmDsgKOio23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqBD_UYVXLe02dSXfk9mj2BMob_w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NGhnT_iOEIn2sQKk9u22Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFAe_YdaB97Gc26YuIULLWLYk-ohQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13503692</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NGhnT_iOEIn2sQKk9u22Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFAe_YdaB97Gc26YuIULLWLYk-ohQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4j1nT9XoAse2sQKz_Ki3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHxv3Qz1ctoY62lL0d3NdTdnoXjGA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13493398</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4j1nT9XoAse2sQKz_Ki3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHxv3Qz1ctoY62lL0d3NdTdnoXjGA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0jVnT-z9MKnW2gXwlLmvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEON_11AXMxCkVRd8lmS8TFNLT40A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13492342</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0jVnT-z9MKnW2gXwlLmvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEON_11AXMxCkVRd8lmS8TFNLT40A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zhdnT-TEMMLI2gWj4O3SCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjM9Pi7kSKUJ_9IRfyiAHG4mQCVg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13489637</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zhdnT-TEMMLI2gWj4O3SCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjM9Pi7kSKUJ_9IRfyiAHG4mQCVg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qOlmT_6sGK_isQL27Ji3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG5CzJZZ86XeqpWot_7GsYTqbMXbQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13486556</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qOlmT_6sGK_isQL27Ji3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG5CzJZZ86XeqpWot_7GsYTqbMXbQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Jc1mT-m2CbHfsQLZ2-m2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFq0WMnbHyC9GCXA_rPFV0GVNz8QA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13486316</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Jc1mT-m2CbHfsQLZ2-m2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFq0WMnbHyC9GCXA_rPFV0GVNz8QA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VL9mT-uKGMG4sQLxt4i3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGDRAAA5O7aDLndg75-hpYJzpwWCg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13485487</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VL9mT-uKGMG4sQLxt4i3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGDRAAA5O7aDLndg75-hpYJzpwWCg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=G5VmT4vWKdLMsQK4wpG3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFDKVneSDL9-MfgHMvI2QN9c-Hy_Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13482142</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=G5VmT4vWKdLMsQK4wpG3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFDKVneSDL9-MfgHMvI2QN9c-Hy_Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=92pmT46JF-2CsAL3y4S3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEssQAW8uRQe1rCnyHWhkDDZDY1VQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13478524</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=92pmT46JF-2CsAL3y4S3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEssQAW8uRQe1rCnyHWhkDDZDY1VQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0UBmT_WOGa_5sQKp0ui2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEarMYCfrtSqGwQd00sd5Z850SIHQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13473419</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0UBmT_WOGa_5sQKp0ui2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEarMYCfrtSqGwQd00sd5Z850SIHQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=miVmT87rN6LosQL7waC3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfy-ett_yOALZuW5OGwCASxZVtWA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13469997</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=miVmT87rN6LosQL7waC3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfy-ett_yOALZuW5OGwCASxZVtWA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oBZmT7qSGsqe2gXfh9GxCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0WRYHenEpT5ZhvI04eSYcehhhrw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13467543</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oBZmT7qSGsqe2gXfh9GxCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0WRYHenEpT5ZhvI04eSYcehhhrw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=a-xlT5iJGsS-2AWD3KzYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFm1BZijsW0pbRfk9CKtEQW9N72JQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13456616</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=a-xlT5iJGsS-2AWD3KzYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFm1BZijsW0pbRfk9CKtEQW9N72JQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xdplT5S-I6nMsQK40L2zDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYDroNSFBiTSq4u5_Fqwkc1Be34Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13454353</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xdplT5S-I6nMsQK40L2zDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYDroNSFBiTSq4u5_Fqwkc1Be34Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ccZlT8_5Lqjm2gXD8fHeCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEx4H-TpmfhSn56-VrhvqyJCJzrHQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13452102</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ccZlT8_5Lqjm2gXD8fHeCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEx4H-TpmfhSn56-VrhvqyJCJzrHQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QphlT6GFOMGrsQK_zpC3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdiJhSHHIcpdPkY4gNpUCLrAE57A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13448679</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QphlT6GFOMGrsQK_zpC3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdiJhSHHIcpdPkY4gNpUCLrAE57A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_31lT7C3MuOrsQLdntm2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF59wxfZdiNg64jAHD8uE7-C6bdXA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13448418</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_31lT7C3MuOrsQLdntm2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF59wxfZdiNg64jAHD8uE7-C6bdXA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6G1lT--iCaTjsQK0jb23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJBxB4wgb6x0KkilSPxjfl41s-Lg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13447532</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6G1lT--iCaTjsQK0jb23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJBxB4wgb6x0KkilSPxjfl41s-Lg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=80NlT8iCBoqFsAK0-b23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH3lvpZG5i60ZBTi6OQLCF1i6Olkg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13442418</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=80NlT8iCBoqFsAK0-b23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH3lvpZG5i60ZBTi6OQLCF1i6Olkg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nRllT-efBqf5sQL9g-23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBBx2cLo21KZ0amReDESxa2TpNbQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13438347</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nRllT-efBqf5sQL9g-23Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBBx2cLo21KZ0amReDESxa2TpNbQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=f-9kT6-GBeGQsAKTofG2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuUs9-GAjV492va0ljWlRHtDRu5Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13433164</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=f-9kT6-GBeGQsAKTofG2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuUs9-GAjV492va0ljWlRHtDRu5Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VdNkT7upMoTJsQKL3cW3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFbNSRSi-tyysLixRaAEaNSwH1DQg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13429479</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VdNkT7upMoTJsQKL3cW3Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFbNSRSi-tyysLixRaAEaNSwH1DQg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RMVkT4SqI42qsAKZrqC2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVVXhdJcyd9mYeN5ANtvUL0NlcUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13427110</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RMVkT4SqI42qsAKZrqC2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVVXhdJcyd9mYeN5ANtvUL0NlcUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LJtkT7qCGMeKsQLIle22Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFIZPw6tbTfILs0M_d-jX-5QZIyPQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13416199</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LJtkT7qCGMeKsQLIle22Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFIZPw6tbTfILs0M_d-jX-5QZIyPQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_oxkT6rjGKKGsgK42dW2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEYddn4E1c5sA877EYQCDrjFTcMAA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13414630</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_oxkT6rjGKKGsgK42dW2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEYddn4E1c5sA877EYQCDrjFTcMAA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GnVkT5X8LrCDsAL7-qy2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDJh7pxbjXdwRx-3sd9NHA8zgE7A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13412429</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GnVkT5X8LrCDsAL7-qy2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEDJh7pxbjXdwRx-3sd9NHA8zgE7A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XUdkT5iQOob22gWq1Y3gCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwihLmR12aDQj6Gogf0Xk6QBvhQQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13408826</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XUdkT5iQOob22gWq1Y3gCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFwihLmR12aDQj6Gogf0Xk6QBvhQQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2itkT_vVL6igsgL01_i2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtDqH-_7hSKmYX291930P4aHrl_w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13408544</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2itkT_vVL6igsgL01_i2Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtDqH-_7hSKmYX291930P4aHrl_w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QRxkT5O9J6mPsQLum423Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXvU5EW2uk4vlmWx6wfYbic2lOiA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13407660</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QRxkT5O9J6mPsQLum423Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXvU5EW2uk4vlmWx6wfYbic2lOiA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W_JjT7meLeeW2AXtmcnbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF8Sdopdto5HpG2tCZ27WQvTVOBtg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13403924</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W_JjT7meLeeW2AXtmcnbCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF8Sdopdto5HpG2tCZ27WQvTVOBtg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LchjT-r3AYHlsQL9uZGcCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFly2hVdL9fN2tinDRwkDzBZt1J1Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13403746</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LchjT-r3AYHlsQL9uZGcCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFly2hVdL9fN2tinDRwkDzBZt1J1Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AJ5jT6qtI4eFsALbg_SbCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfWevvYy1X_7D90qHEzcVUqgzD5w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13403558</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AJ5jT6qtI4eFsALbg_SbCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfWevvYy1X_7D90qHEzcVUqgzD5w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=l4RjT4-ZJ4aosQKA0_ibCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGAFnel3lPcOa9nrF199rug72chnw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13403282</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=l4RjT4-ZJ4aosQKA0_ibCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGAFnel3lPcOa9nrF199rug72chnw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KUpjT--JBeKS2QXP1-XrCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5lpYS5YS976P9QUjVfoOghh2qeg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13398891</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KUpjT--JBeKS2QXP1-XrCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5lpYS5YS976P9QUjVfoOghh2qeg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pSFjT7GHDKbO2AWrkp3WCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEp_BrKTK6ruASnGLsomWJyujeiMA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13398053</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pSFjT7GHDKbO2AWrkp3WCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEp_BrKTK6ruASnGLsomWJyujeiMA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=avViT5LtJKeq2QX85tXPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESUK5PdaZYrMGuXozoK1dOzL-2Lw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13395345</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=avViT5LtJKeq2QX85tXPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESUK5PdaZYrMGuXozoK1dOzL-2Lw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=n-FiT-jXIIaRsAKAvbycCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGOt7UCeFYQS89F95UFZFhY3cdBhA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13393350</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=n-FiT-jXIIaRsAKAvbycCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGOt7UCeFYQS89F95UFZFhY3cdBhA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U8tiT779Ie-psALizYGcCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfoNO_S0lKsrBBPIgU8uE7c1QWhw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13389669</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U8tiT779Ie-psALizYGcCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfoNO_S0lKsrBBPIgU8uE7c1QWhw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TKFiT-GILOrg2gXKxZTMCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1dKloqX-bmYodwtqCcV5bQMmr2g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13381437</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TKFiT-GILOrg2gXKxZTMCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1dKloqX-bmYodwtqCcV5bQMmr2g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5XZiT_jZK4aEsAL_srikDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFyAvxTP0kO4m8jAU1-kmEb70vH7g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13377886</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5XZiT_jZK4aEsAL_srikDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFyAvxTP0kO4m8jAU1-kmEb70vH7g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=30xiT6imPITW2gWS1azcCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEXl0nHvdIrHwQzC_ploFS8NM_E8g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13373949</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=30xiT6imPITW2gWS1azcCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEXl0nHvdIrHwQzC_ploFS8NM_E8g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=njhiT9i9GMLYsgLAqJGkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKYFl_RmbCv98otlvP5eLP4EZ7Kw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13371576</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=njhiT9i9GMLYsgLAqJGkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGKYFl_RmbCv98otlvP5eLP4EZ7Kw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fyJiT4GcMsK_2QXwvei2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNED7EBBVN_nBdHeO8k9P7b_d3SqnQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13364033</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fyJiT4GcMsK_2QXwvei2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNED7EBBVN_nBdHeO8k9P7b_d3SqnQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cx5iT5b0GerC2wWj_NXvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFn0JOWK_TWVEa2QurVjxgW72IJOQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13362572</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cx5iT5b0GerC2wWj_NXvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFn0JOWK_TWVEa2QurVjxgW72IJOQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uQBiT-36BqLlsQLbxrSkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHgLx1zIXCPY_5QWlO47lAC0OIoow" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13361257</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uQBiT-36BqLlsQLbxrSkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHgLx1zIXCPY_5QWlO47lAC0OIoow&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zs9hT4aWGOSJsgKJ8KWkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPErolRbC8BZuxqLz2e6sXs4CHIg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13358720</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zs9hT4aWGOSJsgKJ8KWkDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPErolRbC8BZuxqLz2e6sXs4CHIg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-aNhT9j_HcX7sQK3hq2JAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfG_UrifsCh1OtilLMvpQSmUKdRg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13355828</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-aNhT9j_HcX7sQK3hq2JAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfG_UrifsCh1OtilLMvpQSmUKdRg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=941hT57aJKKb2QWWw4XJCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMZ7e7Uj0PBWj_TpLKpQt2Hf-_4A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13353846</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=941hT57aJKKb2QWWw4XJCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMZ7e7Uj0PBWj_TpLKpQt2Hf-_4A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nHlhT4CXOOT42gXUjbWPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1vDUuIdY5b07tbefNVsRS1EthGQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13350874</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nHlhT4CXOOT42gXUjbWPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1vDUuIdY5b07tbefNVsRS1EthGQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gE9hT8DOO8_JsQK2-djyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFe4d1B1Lb63gWMYifX8oBVyxTZwg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13340467</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gE9hT8DOO8_JsQK2-djyAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFe4d1B1Lb63gWMYifX8oBVyxTZwg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HiVhT_SSAcji2QX4x72CCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE82Zw7JrGCkzJl0uwZWdsN2g27fA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13336475</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HiVhT_SSAcji2QX4x72CCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE82Zw7JrGCkzJl0uwZWdsN2g27fA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9PpgT5meBY2H2AWE-OCaCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQfzNo7LS7NDbVhfBSjxocLDZCwg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13332423</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9PpgT5meBY2H2AWE-OCaCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQfzNo7LS7NDbVhfBSjxocLDZCwg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uOVgT7XFD8iW2gW1oOm0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIDrBmEXBK6tu5VDhxyuDsjeze8w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13330211</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uOVgT7XFD8iW2gW1oOm0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIDrBmEXBK6tu5VDhxyuDsjeze8w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P9FgT7wPjIOwAuvv3JYI&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHlLenp1vcQ3lvlP_rNlrZ738va7w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13326271</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P9FgT7wPjIOwAuvv3JYI&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHlLenp1vcQ3lvlP_rNlrZ738va7w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KK5gT6KyFtTKsQL4oJSWCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfpc5eUjP-1RLM4Lr97DqrO--5Yw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13318826</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KK5gT6KyFtTKsQL4oJSWCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfpc5eUjP-1RLM4Lr97DqrO--5Yw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FKdgT6qzI8jL2QXH_cCdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrt5ihIaz93ntfawhDK_6fFuyAfg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13318344</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FKdgT6qzI8jL2QXH_cCdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrt5ihIaz93ntfawhDK_6fFuyAfg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iYBgT-T_CYXm2AWXvuSpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhsz6hKK09fa5ywJgR4amUaC0_sw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13315815</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iYBgT-T_CYXm2AWXvuSpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhsz6hKK09fa5ywJgR4amUaC0_sw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0VJgT5qeD4Pu2gXm-a2BCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiL4Jd8y6E6sVDoVW_nNwYa9qDQA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13312930</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0VJgT5qeD4Pu2gXm-a2BCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCoQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiL4Jd8y6E6sVDoVW_nNwYa9qDQA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3z9gT7XRI4awsgKs_Yi6Aw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxI_z5LKKzD0e8_xvpZgS6ooNQRQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13312645</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3z9gT7XRI4awsgKs_Yi6Aw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxI_z5LKKzD0e8_xvpZgS6ooNQRQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EyhgT7v8FYrg2AX8p5mVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHxPZOCZuvS_Pm9Iw5egeJlG6Tygw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13310579</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EyhgT7v8FYrg2AX8p5mVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHxPZOCZuvS_Pm9Iw5egeJlG6Tygw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9v1fT4fXFcWGsgLYtICiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1fXHw5Mf0NcKxEPQfQP0OOmctIw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13300527</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9v1fT4fXFcWGsgLYtICiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1fXHw5Mf0NcKxEPQfQP0OOmctIw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lNNfT43UFc-JsAK2nYWTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvqYoJaOxVTBRuCFue4XfJ_Zh3Kg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13296295</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lNNfT43UFc-JsAK2nYWTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvqYoJaOxVTBRuCFue4XfJ_Zh3Kg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jqlfT63bNcTC2wWFr9SSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGrAcHVZdkSnrudQaU5lxj0GBIUtw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13291370</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jqlfT63bNcTC2wWFr9SSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGrAcHVZdkSnrudQaU5lxj0GBIUtw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R5JfT5mVJeKC2wX3tsmMCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFug8V8SWoRkFZ31oW27x17MlhAsw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13288619</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R5JfT5mVJeKC2wX3tsmMCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFug8V8SWoRkFZ31oW27x17MlhAsw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oH9fT-m0OMSvsgKq2bykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFANln0r5zFfgz1IcI31w6MjX1yJQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13284308</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oH9fT-m0OMSvsgKq2bykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFANln0r5zFfgz1IcI31w6MjX1yJQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O1ZfT5BcwqDaBZaqgYQI&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJmyY4vFHdCzhOzUSMStvo8r41Ng" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13276607</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O1ZfT5BcwqDaBZaqgYQI&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJmyY4vFHdCzhOzUSMStvo8r41Ng&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KkpfT-nWDoPq2QWDs4CnCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbtr7OLTKh1Pwd6aOBqtbdIZN3hg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13275921</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KkpfT-nWDoPq2QWDs4CnCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbtr7OLTKh1Pwd6aOBqtbdIZN3hg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MC5fT-ziGMbS2QX8xeWJCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGs8gq3Cg3ZWo0hTWEOYBstVa6DLA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13273609</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MC5fT-ziGMbS2QX8xeWJCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGs8gq3Cg3ZWo0hTWEOYBstVa6DLA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LAFfT_OxM8fe2AXqmcGpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHt3jG93CNQJkWEw2PsSqhua7Tf5g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13270455</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LAFfT_OxM8fe2AXqmcGpCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHt3jG93CNQJkWEw2PsSqhua7Tf5g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LOheT8TOFsGQ2gWrrc2mCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFUQtv0JOBFAd4JcdbUfSauBc8iSw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13270171</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LOheT8TOFsGQ2gWrrc2mCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFUQtv0JOBFAd4JcdbUfSauBc8iSw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9ZeT8m5CuOy2wWxg9yzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwzcd1i_cmbmqV001QppYeCEVslA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13269221</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9ZeT8m5CuOy2wWxg9yzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwzcd1i_cmbmqV001QppYeCEVslA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bKxeT_PUBenC2wXGh-DzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE7I9qYS3IcxPxMsiYZ450zYre2bg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13259237</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bKxeT_PUBenC2wXGh-DzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE7I9qYS3IcxPxMsiYZ450zYre2bg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SoJeT8HbOIeFsALi6cTNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQzYCUsFhB3aZxSGXK74cCXv-fmQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13254753</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SoJeT8HbOIeFsALi6cTNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQzYCUsFhB3aZxSGXK74cCXv-fmQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_FdeT7m_MOHi2gW5-N2HDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-LOnVgiBzF4rewFSBw8jKanrFcA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13249852</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_FdeT7m_MOHi2gW5-N2HDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-LOnVgiBzF4rewFSBw8jKanrFcA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OT1eT5LxGcLi2AWkkZnSDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGkz91JL0quVg2E8rBVj31-BoqDAw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13246805</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OT1eT5LxGcLi2AWkkZnSDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGkz91JL0quVg2E8rBVj31-BoqDAw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DS5eT4LLKJTisQL-i63EDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXkAjUHl59lWyU1Q0TvcK0m31AmQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13244657</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DS5eT4LLKJTisQL-i63EDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXkAjUHl59lWyU1Q0TvcK0m31AmQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FgReT5jECojO2wWO_KHaDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGenVrwrIXiDt66V5ExM62STvSjeA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13235034</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FgReT5jECojO2wWO_KHaDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGenVrwrIXiDt66V5ExM62STvSjeA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jvtdT62XLOeW2AXDn6zCAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsb1BHYZHSS-JWM1VVgpAqBbzZ3A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13234363</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jvtdT62XLOeW2AXDn6zCAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsb1BHYZHSS-JWM1VVgpAqBbzZ3A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ut1dT-vgJ-Oo2wWayZ37Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEugT_YBa-T0PTWnXYAQ0EKZdtG_w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13232135</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ut1dT-vgJ-Oo2wWayZ37Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEugT_YBa-T0PTWnXYAQ0EKZdtG_w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ta9dT4KvDaW02wWIrI2BDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcVnUkIm9u7TGl1vJtC1IHvy8S1g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13228958</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ta9dT4KvDaW02wWIrI2BDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcVnUkIm9u7TGl1vJtC1IHvy8S1g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=upddT6ukI6n02wW0m4CFDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvIxtgM4tgBYXpcFlJijlQImpygA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13228668</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=upddT6ukI6n02wW0m4CFDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvIxtgM4tgBYXpcFlJijlQImpygA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GoVdT7K3A8Wa2AXvvdT8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGD5bnEDKrGTNjxyn0nrLI1jc4RUA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13227687</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GoVdT7K3A8Wa2AXvvdT8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGD5bnEDKrGTNjxyn0nrLI1jc4RUA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01pdT_q0KIqDsAKwxYXTDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNED_-HiOSE55GwnBFwTbaqrMTzvRw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13219901</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01pdT_q0KIqDsAKwxYXTDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNED_-HiOSE55GwnBFwTbaqrMTzvRw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QutcT46pNMK_2QXN1ODWDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXnGS8M2fI6cy55GFuSQeiy_TTDA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13207376</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QutcT46pNMK_2QXN1ODWDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXnGS8M2fI6cy55GFuSQeiy_TTDA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kKdcT5CJKMjL2QXJwMGOBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9Z5BDJhI736X3i5dgJTFiM6CrZg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13193525</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kKdcT5CJKMjL2QXJwMGOBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9Z5BDJhI736X3i5dgJTFiM6CrZg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bVJcT92XIYjo2AXaguXNDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEomGmA97Lf_fdclwTQ5ygAisq3XA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13187785</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bVJcT92XIYjo2AXaguXNDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEomGmA97Lf_fdclwTQ5ygAisq3XA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FcNbT561MY7hsQKrqrS_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZgU75QyWJnYYvXPUkLlfi_O7eSg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13167791</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FcNbT561MY7hsQKrqrS_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZgU75QyWJnYYvXPUkLlfi_O7eSg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UapbT_2WJ8-JsAKZyKHNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEO0nDjRsBUOZo9ez0p40_ZDbNPHg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13164983</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UapbT_2WJ8-JsAKZyKHNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEO0nDjRsBUOZo9ez0p40_ZDbNPHg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=65hbT5e-OOWe2wXfwoCDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG1k-eCs01RlwoIQAjdpWKP23sN7w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13162295</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=65hbT5e-OOWe2wXfwoCDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG1k-eCs01RlwoIQAjdpWKP23sN7w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6W5bT6CRGuGQ2gXE9cT6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE87ZVH9LFwNGq8S2X59Ks4qT0ABw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13152498</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6W5bT6CRGuGQ2gXE9cT6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE87ZVH9LFwNGq8S2X59Ks4qT0ABw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WxbT8XWE4P02QXh2fDeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEU8rlcCOZoBJHziw2GQEpPLItghQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13152242</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WxbT8XWE4P02QXh2fDeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEU8rlcCOZoBJHziw2GQEpPLItghQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DkVbT9yXI6rM2AXSwomKAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQrpIYTklKBHyCH8DFC68I5ESKfw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13149178</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DkVbT9yXI6rM2AXSwomKAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQrpIYTklKBHyCH8DFC68I5ESKfw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZxtbT4KSGMqGsgLkjMXJDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmY-HRyY6Cp9BYjQV99Dp1xYGQiA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13146773</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZxtbT4KSGMqGsgLkjMXJDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmY-HRyY6Cp9BYjQV99Dp1xYGQiA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-AJbT9bdDcmL2AXgi83lDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzfafl4LKgnVMA4tD-C7IyCiEycQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13146482</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-AJbT9bdDcmL2AXgi83lDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEzfafl4LKgnVMA4tD-C7IyCiEycQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KPBaT5-2N4SNsALZmOWxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFA0282gSW7GVBAAAsUpNXM6XKkDA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13145385</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KPBaT5-2N4SNsALZmOWxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFA0282gSW7GVBAAAsUpNXM6XKkDA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-MVaT5qaHtSk2gWwqeHvDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfbP9V9dRvCZRkcb3s_s6TGhlfzg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13136184</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-MVaT5qaHtSk2gWwqeHvDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfbP9V9dRvCZRkcb3s_s6TGhlfzg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yptaT5ueAaad2QXgy8XwDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGbqmzBLC6JEbyXwpEZ5b4C_otocg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13132516</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yptaT5ueAaad2QXgy8XwDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGbqmzBLC6JEbyXwpEZ5b4C_otocg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PnJaT4f2I-Wg2AXSuYnjDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEMTFVNmPrXddO_GaS8yAz7JJlLHA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13127736</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PnJaT4f2I-Wg2AXSuYnjDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEMTFVNmPrXddO_GaS8yAz7JJlLHA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LFlaT4PdEMW_2QXw8fjuDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjF0j7LVfAfsEOLg336iTcaKVd5g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13124503</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LFlaT4PdEMW_2QXw8fjuDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjF0j7LVfAfsEOLg336iTcaKVd5g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XkdaT833IJT1sQKokaTJDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH7GU62zC3YCphD_UOOk3ewYfqt2g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13121542</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XkdaT833IJT1sQKokaTJDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH7GU62zC3YCphD_UOOk3ewYfqt2g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mx1aT_G5LMK1sQLE66zkDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEphFlygGFJpZJbVyVkj6FmkmQElQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13111293</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mx1aT_G5LMK1sQLE66zkDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEphFlygGFJpZJbVyVkj6FmkmQElQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xRBaT9CvM6LlsQLWwYHaDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFT_xo0rqtKSIpjWCz-k_NUDQSEFA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13110008</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xRBaT9CvM6LlsQLWwYHaDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFT_xo0rqtKSIpjWCz-k_NUDQSEFA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UvNZT7HCBtTKsQKNjfnEDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEevxlEV_yxuXp6V0EfFqQiMdZShg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13107643</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UvNZT7HCBtTKsQKNjfnEDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEevxlEV_yxuXp6V0EfFqQiMdZShg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=w8lZT4KDD7OmsALwhYm5DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGi4r5smEO7M0eGhTf8yoeMcIeN_Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13104670</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=w8lZT4KDD7OmsALwhYm5DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGi4r5smEO7M0eGhTf8yoeMcIeN_Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Va9ZT--XPIeCsALLxNXZAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHeQUjhEIYteJU8gV4rexLKY3z-jg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13104380</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Va9ZT--XPIeCsALLxNXZAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHeQUjhEIYteJU8gV4rexLKY3z-jg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r55ZT9WmMYuosAL5-tjZDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHktliBwjDlFxs0HcnyDcsZPapcwQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13103324</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r55ZT9WmMYuosAL5-tjZDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHktliBwjDlFxs0HcnyDcsZPapcwQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WnRZT9yzBofpsQLK-I3ADQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH4brlcvjrCPbmeb1eAyT7VaaX9dw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13098091</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WnRZT9yzBofpsQLK-I3ADQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH4brlcvjrCPbmeb1eAyT7VaaX9dw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LEpZT4XVNI32sQK179WuDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGDjtuwQgvDAR0aqKP6E7zbf01s3g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13094024</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LEpZT4XVNI32sQK179WuDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGDjtuwQgvDAR0aqKP6E7zbf01s3g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DSBZT-maNYb3sQKx7Z3XDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3Pnf19LeJz9pcpj7GkNxom35-Ow" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13088957</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DSBZT-maNYb3sQKx7Z3XDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3Pnf19LeJz9pcpj7GkNxom35-Ow&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kQhZT4TTL-mssAK89vC-DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGoOQNayl6xZtcbm02IN1jcWnD4Aw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13085994</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kQhZT4TTL-mssAK89vC-DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGoOQNayl6xZtcbm02IN1jcWnD4Aw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8vVYT92JLIeQsAKOxKnKDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEP2bilwS2uZOm4-QoMIBd8zOcLng" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13083104</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8vVYT92JLIeQsAKOxKnKDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEP2bilwS2uZOm4-QoMIBd8zOcLng&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Y85YT-yADs3jsQKO2IjCDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzabtFcet-2HZ-uDZxhbs0ce91ww" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13072565</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Y85YT-yADs3jsQKO2IjCDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzabtFcet-2HZ-uDZxhbs0ce91ww&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vblYT5K-Maz2sQKcwLmPBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEuStqTyHpr72GWJuqfxJ4Cf9b2DQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13070760</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vblYT5K-Maz2sQKcwLmPBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEuStqTyHpr72GWJuqfxJ4Cf9b2DQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SKJYT-TfEceEsgKlruXbDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_vq7_UoPxQwzECc-bicW_CB_Gzw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13068498</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SKJYT-TfEceEsgKlruXbDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_vq7_UoPxQwzECc-bicW_CB_Gzw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1HdYT6S6KMb5sQL0k5GxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnotyX4Hgk6halP8y00AM0cYUAFg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13065245</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1HdYT6S6KMb5sQL0k5GxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnotyX4Hgk6halP8y00AM0cYUAFg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=f2FYT-PFI6vMsQLT_tGvDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHP1KXDSD6zPTXz4Tg6Jyspr2dSPg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13064962</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=f2FYT-PFI6vMsQLT_tGvDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHP1KXDSD6zPTXz4Tg6Jyspr2dSPg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GE1YT9blOeansAL7rPmtDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHmh6obTbxTF8e47clnjtXLL0gHYg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13063846</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GE1YT9blOeansAL7rPmtDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHmh6obTbxTF8e47clnjtXLL0gHYg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4iJYT672D-SxsALTgr20DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPzo46xOFzyWQsaDwlYzyrKizIEw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13058526</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4iJYT672D-SxsALTgr20DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPzo46xOFzyWQsaDwlYzyrKizIEw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sPhXT6i7M6iPsQKAuajiDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbEzytiaoYGEeA7MIumiLPB9Q4vA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13054732</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sPhXT6i7M6iPsQKAuajiDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbEzytiaoYGEeA7MIumiLPB9Q4vA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A89XT5LuDYnu2gWFnLHPDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxQGI4xUiA8K2b59ulNDDj2SVRLQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13049884</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A89XT5LuDYnu2gWFnLHPDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxQGI4xUiA8K2b59ulNDDj2SVRLQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ILVXT4T3FYHi2gWKyamFDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHd2UImOVCMIU_aoEXWxMsHT_iqyA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13046589</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ILVXT4T3FYHi2gWKyamFDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHd2UImOVCMIU_aoEXWxMsHT_iqyA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RaRXT62fHaPisQKxmNW1DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFSyUmPiMESbcqXC43NAYgJMT_tNw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13043726</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RaRXT62fHaPisQKxmNW1DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFSyUmPiMESbcqXC43NAYgJMT_tNw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MHtXT5zeLunO2gXI-Nn-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGL7CGtAiPYc0Uq4jwNwEkloWbITw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13032891</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MHtXT5zeLunO2gXI-Nn-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGL7CGtAiPYc0Uq4jwNwEkloWbITw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=emRXT4uRKsKW2QW1u_jQDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0TBmKONmcYUYdmIvTHgFgGvWmcw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13030769</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=emRXT4uRKsKW2QW1u_jQDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH0TBmKONmcYUYdmIvTHgFgGvWmcw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FVBXT4nuG4rq2wWQhJj1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxH2qcIgptOq8UG5SbAj7u9RmopQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13028909</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FVBXT4nuG4rq2wWQhJj1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxH2qcIgptOq8UG5SbAj7u9RmopQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ESdXT4PEOOn9sQKPuuHNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhVZ3bucDC0fh0BShC01-m0ypTgA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13025394</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ESdXT4PEOOn9sQKPuuHNDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhVZ3bucDC0fh0BShC01-m0ypTgA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZRBXT8CANsbg2QWK-7XgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElcYcwVWy1va4Vc9GesDikM1HCig" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13025117</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZRBXT8CANsbg2QWK-7XgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElcYcwVWy1va4Vc9GesDikM1HCig&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g_tWT5aPAsiF2AW3qbD5Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG0zrWjZubJkoOKn34shEKD5FSA7g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13024013</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g_tWT5aPAsiF2AW3qbD5Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG0zrWjZubJkoOKn34shEKD5FSA7g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UdFWT9LMIunO2gWp1dDlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEahw9jxyFUcsxykAn5ddc8JTUcCA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13019291</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UdFWT9LMIunO2gWp1dDlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEahw9jxyFUcsxykAn5ddc8JTUcCA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NKdWT92_MpGrsALcxaDJCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQdBnQJnC6wyPdSeNm2EZeZcnfqg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13015580</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NKdWT92_MpGrsALcxaDJCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQdBnQJnC6wyPdSeNm2EZeZcnfqg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9nxWT47rNoGvsQLKhvjdCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXeh__2UnstEul-ZFJh1_06DeUlQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13010429</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9nxWT47rNoGvsQLKhvjdCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXeh__2UnstEul-ZFJh1_06DeUlQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jmNWT469McezsAKp6ankCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE6ohUxIki6xgIyQQLrUir6F6xeuQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13007038</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jmNWT469McezsAKp6ankCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE6ohUxIki6xgIyQQLrUir6F6xeuQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z1JWT-HGK8XMsQLv0pjSCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEjeyqmmtHuwOso2MqJSPottrsN0Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/13004010</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z1JWT-HGK8XMsQLv0pjSCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEjeyqmmtHuwOso2MqJSPottrsN0Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mylWT47hFoyqsAK409nPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF91EzFa6dggA6az17nV0T-zmVPrA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12993249</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mylWT47hFoyqsAK409nPCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF91EzFa6dggA6az17nV0T-zmVPrA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yhFWT7TKOKetsQKF7bnpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFg3dEpS0ZrID29Gwc5ys7ZlSLSWQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12990478</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yhFWT7TKOKetsQKF7bnpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFg3dEpS0ZrID29Gwc5ys7ZlSLSWQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=j_5VT_eOGsavsAK886jpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTQKrlP4R3HNTpZoRmJNK7-2ka7Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12988607</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=j_5VT_eOGsavsAK886jpCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTQKrlP4R3HNTpZoRmJNK7-2ka7Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g9RVT-DaELL_sQLC-ZXjCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFBm0a9Uh9jEY7R8sHrWOPYZIRQyw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12985208</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g9RVT-DaELL_sQLC-ZXjCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFBm0a9Uh9jEY7R8sHrWOPYZIRQyw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MLpVT9aQGsqmsALh7aTOCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNETXCq0Ymi5fnfpEvkjzRZ_gYT-kw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12984933</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MLpVT9aQGsqmsALh7aTOCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNETXCq0Ymi5fnfpEvkjzRZ_gYT-kw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DqpVT5nPIuuGsgLr2NDVCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHUlGXvHi7zje-F-1vtSZwNWpua3w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12983944</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DqpVT5nPIuuGsgLr2NDVCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHUlGXvHi7zje-F-1vtSZwNWpua3w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2H9VT4TmOqaJsAKtxfTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBglI7CH6ZyRdEKoKDFNm4E307CA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12980402</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2H9VT4TmOqaJsAKtxfTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEBglI7CH6ZyRdEKoKDFNm4E307CA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVVVT-nfFPKpsALFt4jwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEk0y4EpIfi54F2s3NVoeQwXWjUQg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12976879</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVVVT-nfFPKpsALFt4jwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEk0y4EpIfi54F2s3NVoeQwXWjUQg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iStVT_iNCeKHsgLygPXvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGGoKTQmLClOE9AxsLGWzfZ2_GfyQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12971976</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iStVT_iNCeKHsgLygPXvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGGoKTQmLClOE9AxsLGWzfZ2_GfyQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=phJVT8X4OOeJsQKtotHvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHC-cC3Ni0QLu07XQxNfbCRxgbINw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12968671</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=phJVT8X4OOeJsQKtotHvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHC-cC3Ni0QLu07XQxNfbCRxgbINw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WQFVT-udJaT_sQKk8tyKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHpoeZYJywDqE9JzJM_3B9i0ShgMA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12965585</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WQFVT-udJaT_sQKk8tyKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHpoeZYJywDqE9JzJM_3B9i0ShgMA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iNhUT9ypEuahsgKG4_XvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtDIi6BQ3sNSXpgDpPbpsN9ehycA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12954643</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iNhUT9ypEuahsgKG4_XvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtDIi6BQ3sNSXpgDpPbpsN9ehycA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ycBUT4KODoKAsgKH94zwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdBbBjDc5mxcjQdpWcv665wMSkDw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12951803</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ycBUT4KODoKAsgKH94zwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFdBbBjDc5mxcjQdpWcv665wMSkDw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C61UT9CNIPGDsgKwpqHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGpOzPF92fdjfJHXRW0njcKVQXimw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12949740</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C61UT9CNIPGDsgKwpqHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGpOzPF92fdjfJHXRW0njcKVQXimw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OoRUT_yOMOvksQKa4tTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEpGtXCkMBAqFiaMyD4eSFxljSlYw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12946585</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OoRUT_yOMOvksQKa4tTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEpGtXCkMBAqFiaMyD4eSFxljSlYw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rmlUT7PSIIKasgKJkZ3wBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPYvvGFKgcfwRQ26_cAgaxBneMyw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12946290</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rmlUT7PSIIKasgKJkZ3wBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPYvvGFKgcfwRQ26_cAgaxBneMyw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nFhUT47wNKaesQKsroDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHv2gpLaV3WXxeV1Ghy-9MkkfpLw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12945295</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nFhUT47wNKaesQKsroDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHv2gpLaV3WXxeV1Ghy-9MkkfpLw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VC5UT4v1IKT_sQKk8tyKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHmJPlXyyVCLx8He86-87TnkiMpFw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12942037</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VC5UT4v1IKT_sQKk8tyKCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHmJPlXyyVCLx8He86-87TnkiMpFw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JwRUT4vWA-P2sQLU-oTwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLviYlaaQyXQxwLKnx0vmZoiWdcg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12938629</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JwRUT4vWA-P2sQLU-oTwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLviYlaaQyXQxwLKnx0vmZoiWdcg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9tlTT5-EO-HIsQKdhZHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-OTlrAgBovY5fz4D3gpbJpUoynw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12933550</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9tlTT5-EO-HIsQKdhZHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-OTlrAgBovY5fz4D3gpbJpUoynw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zr5TT9-NLamssQLDnP3vBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwD4GEzDjqe5bKvFEsBJMr4zYBWw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12930171</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zr5TT9-NLamssQLDnP3vBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwD4GEzDjqe5bKvFEsBJMr4zYBWw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=069TT865DorgsQKw8oHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHYbnpAMF1prpyanpNZEi6PKsZkxg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12927480</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=069TT865DorgsQKw8oHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHYbnpAMF1prpyanpNZEi6PKsZkxg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OoZTT9j9I4TlsQKE7YHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFM8GFn7KDMtoJl7mVWi-01LPgJBg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12916202</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OoZTT9j9I4TlsQKE7YHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFM8GFn7KDMtoJl7mVWi-01LPgJBg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5GxTT8SNBovKsQKFo53wBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrnTHutUiueLmCwxJJpivMpIxWyg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12913178</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5GxTT8SNBovKsQKFo53wBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrnTHutUiueLmCwxJJpivMpIxWyg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iVtTT9jcKuiDsAL5wJjwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEpit6j1PUgwhfA1jtw7JKJHL9_OA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12911304</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iVtTT9jcKuiDsAL5wJjwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEpit6j1PUgwhfA1jtw7JKJHL9_OA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gjJTT-ChLYOosQK3kIHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGRbwaiNeRQy8t8tv9UnrwJlItmUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12907916</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gjJTT-ChLYOosQK3kIHwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGRbwaiNeRQy8t8tv9UnrwJlItmUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uRVTT7bCIaOQsQK7_vHvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcwqoCFp1Rotp2n_7B3cfH41F6tA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12907627</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uRVTT7bCIaOQsQK7_vHvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcwqoCFp1Rotp2n_7B3cfH41F6tA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HAdTT5HGKfLgsQK897HwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGb2Ot0-2pv-Y50Ga0sWFzt8ilDog" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12906611</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HAdTT5HGKfLgsQK897HwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGb2Ot0-2pv-Y50Ga0sWFzt8ilDog&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5txST5SwLaGGsgLBvZjwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHV_5Qb6AzTeQUtTGUzs0kW2x8RBw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12903215</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5txST5SwLaGGsgLBvZjwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHV_5Qb6AzTeQUtTGUzs0kW2x8RBw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sLJST-ToAe6CsgLTtZDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFukQfCeNN1L8exGe_J2Z_QBToFew" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12900177</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sLJST-ToAe6CsgLTtZDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFukQfCeNN1L8exGe_J2Z_QBToFew&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oohST7yhJuKHsgLygPXvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKAuudxkEtIgwMPHDTKYZpiiiCoQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12895224</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oohST7yhJuKHsgLygPXvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHKAuudxkEtIgwMPHDTKYZpiiiCoQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_mxST_bDLsGtsQKS8fDvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHFjri9mQzJoZJVGuY_PV_GQqBf7Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12891583</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_mxST_bDLsGtsQKS8fDvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHFjri9mQzJoZJVGuY_PV_GQqBf7Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bV5ST83rA5CFsAKm0IDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGO3eRbc5nxmQMkbxhI8H4NS0Jq6Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12888842</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bV5ST83rA5CFsAKm0IDwBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGO3eRbc5nxmQMkbxhI8H4NS0Jq6Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sjVST6-YPIegsgLQt9TvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFw37aX3qXGim7csE1nBk0P0HGRmQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12877650</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sjVST6-YPIegsgLQt9TvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFw37aX3qXGim7csE1nBk0P0HGRmQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nxZST76YOoSqsQKL7OHvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFDZqSDDqEs1nrVhmR0NFLpM7AX6A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12873997</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nxZST76YOoSqsQKL7OHvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFDZqSDDqEs1nrVhmR0NFLpM7AX6A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_QlST4HxD-SNsQKC5OTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE7oN5-BBXoAEH_QiFmJglc3WZTFA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12872606</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_QlST4HxD-SNsQKC5OTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE7oN5-BBXoAEH_QiFmJglc3WZTFA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OOBRT9GmKoGKsgL-lfTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIaAr3kj0jnOw4UqmoNKPRsiypeQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12868747</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OOBRT9GmKoGKsgL-lfTvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIaAr3kj0jnOw4UqmoNKPRsiypeQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=08VRT86YN-KPsQLJrfDvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFN_G9TbqGQva2Sdrgg_MLozvaGUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12868436</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=08VRT86YN-KPsQLJrfDvBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFN_G9TbqGQva2Sdrgg_MLozvaGUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=o7VRT8YqqYOwAqun9O8F&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGko1DBTd75D29WUjpph_0WVa77rw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12867365</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=o7VRT8YqqYOwAqun9O8F&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGko1DBTd75D29WUjpph_0WVa77rw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W4tRT9vAGu3KsQLkoP3vBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0aHeT7-O7kA-cJ-4kq3JlgwXuUQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12860117</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W4tRT9vAGu3KsQLkoP3vBQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0aHeT7-O7kA-cJ-4kq3JlgwXuUQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jWFRT6-pOYK40gHS1cnxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEqBzPYu7oCAhAGt3OvKFqhLBjLrw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12857110</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jWFRT6-pOYK40gHS1cnxDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEqBzPYu7oCAhAGt3OvKFqhLBjLrw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DzdRT6CoBY3qtgfi0a2oDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxvJ04qTas3DGQTHbCJcyAk1Ob3A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12852083</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DzdRT6CoBY3qtgfi0a2oDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGxvJ04qTas3DGQTHbCJcyAk1Ob3A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VB1RT_rDHu_MsQLR95SMBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVld5jItml-FlobkelHxdQUbLTnQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12848689</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VB1RT_rDHu_MsQLR95SMBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVld5jItml-FlobkelHxdQUbLTnQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0gxRT8GVJqfDsQLtq9G-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJWFwGkpfzUxIDqz0Fyie4OA2Egg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12845658</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0gxRT8GVJqfDsQLtq9G-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJWFwGkpfzUxIDqz0Fyie4OA2Egg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=--NQT52IJaiPsQKI073BDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4yRUnfIJL0JhRCNAfs5GDcGkYEg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12834526</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=--NQT52IJaiPsQKI073BDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4yRUnfIJL0JhRCNAfs5GDcGkYEg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=68pQT7e0B4qGsALyxaC4Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFX9B-YglTJZQDxnYflj60LHogK_Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12831751</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=68pQT7e0B4qGsALyxaC4Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFX9B-YglTJZQDxnYflj60LHogK_Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jrhQT_exLKGQsALyqJneDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFifS9NsbVhgu_lL4odFpvb6S9-Jw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12829751</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jrhQT_exLKGQsALyqJneDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFifS9NsbVhgu_lL4odFpvb6S9-Jw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4o5QT-WWG4L4sQKbl5SiDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9lRAz5z-47PZ6ILE7oldNRpWiCw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12826554</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4o5QT-WWG4L4sQKbl5SiDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9lRAz5z-47PZ6ILE7oldNRpWiCw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sHVQT4ndCeWtsAKipLW8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZZsHJb3sM0nctwO3rn_X07g7V4g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12826249</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sHVQT4ndCeWtsAKipLW8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZZsHJb3sM0nctwO3rn_X07g7V4g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PGRQT5CVB8-LsAK85PCoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFNXt_Rv-yZmXavv8aqwbN00jdVcQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12824907</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PGRQT5CVB8-LsAK85PCoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFNXt_Rv-yZmXavv8aqwbN00jdVcQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8TlQT7SEEePIsQKTz8W1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQZx5g4mmvKUH1r5bvrodhYU2qpw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12815763</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8TlQT7SEEePIsQKTz8W1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQZx5g4mmvKUH1r5bvrodhYU2qpw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yA9QT6SDPcelsAKbkoSnDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFb3WDpDRUrsnY70ZG1hVE9etc4Yg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12811057</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yA9QT6SDPcelsAKbkoSnDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFb3WDpDRUrsnY70ZG1hVE9etc4Yg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=guVPT7PZNNOBsgL9s_C6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHONuUzAOoUEr0xJL4IKwxj0gbEhA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12805888</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=guVPT7PZNNOBsgL9s_C6Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHONuUzAOoUEr0xJL4IKwxj0gbEhA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Rs9PT57JC_DMsQLq8YSvDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTWJRf8vL6Tu2KcAnmdP0184bHmw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12802961</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Rs9PT57JC_DMsQLq8YSvDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTWJRf8vL6Tu2KcAnmdP0184bHmw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dbtPT8y6B6X_sQLL0ZC8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1AEYngoliQcUv9nelQ5mmtYcORA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12799161</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dbtPT8y6B6X_sQLL0ZC8Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1AEYngoliQcUv9nelQ5mmtYcORA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=65JPT6-rGqWlsALw0qyuDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTyONQPY-HCUh5WkD2Z0qG0HiMdQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12789682</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=65JPT6-rGqWlsALw0qyuDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTyONQPY-HCUh5WkD2Z0qG0HiMdQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BoZPT8aNH8OQgweK-NzpDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFmp3JeqfPotBhOKLXozel9p1MadA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12788733</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BoZPT8aNH8OQgweK-NzpDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFmp3JeqfPotBhOKLXozel9p1MadA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U2dPT9XuGuj4sQKMytWtDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECWC30nogbNhu2GyghxyNWLKHsnw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12786380</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U2dPT9XuGuj4sQKMytWtDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECWC30nogbNhu2GyghxyNWLKHsnw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YT1PT5bBEZGosALLivmaDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNENvoWlrxhZuSGHBAAWbrlu2BhtQQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12783748</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YT1PT5bBEZGosALLivmaDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNENvoWlrxhZuSGHBAAWbrlu2BhtQQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fCVPT8KVIKmPsQLllOW-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcD3zk9EA56vwkG9kfSvOUKwdQRg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12783415</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fCVPT8KVIKmPsQLllOW-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCgQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGcD3zk9EA56vwkG9kfSvOUKwdQRg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=e-lOT-q7D4qKsgKErcjCDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFosUGxHd5dhrFS5ly_fkExd4Qsxg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12776254</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=e-lOT-q7D4qKsgKErcjCDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFosUGxHd5dhrFS5ly_fkExd4Qsxg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Kb5OT7-ENO2CsAKswOH7Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXMQ0iupcdQ-wXwmDya34ZeQtGyQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12773711</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Kb5OT7-ENO2CsAKswOH7Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHXMQ0iupcdQ-wXwmDya34ZeQtGyQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C5ROT6nNKqaIsQLvoY0h&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFOm1qA8nLPPcaYpL9i4msM7S8M9g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12768624</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C5ROT6nNKqaIsQLvoY0h&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFOm1qA8nLPPcaYpL9i4msM7S8M9g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tndOT6e9HeHIsQLC65QP&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGaLuk-iUy4JgJ_yJAN5I6SLtEjxw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12764756</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tndOT6e9HeHIsQLC65QP&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGaLuk-iUy4JgJ_yJAN5I6SLtEjxw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yGlOT4SgIOOssQLJ06Ak&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGGqSso3cWo0_lX7eD1Sys2jeOnKQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12761897</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yGlOT4SgIOOssQLJ06Ak&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGGqSso3cWo0_lX7eD1Sys2jeOnKQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=20BOT_vVNqqFsAL-350X&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGwhYq1vPxhnrcLV8dPyZV4l-UYbA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12750086</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=20BOT_vVNqqFsAL-350X&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGwhYq1vPxhnrcLV8dPyZV4l-UYbA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5SBOT53hIYjpsQKAncn6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhgRbRVajZa0nRgfB2tIJh5lNISg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12746534</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5SBOT53hIYjpsQKAncn6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhgRbRVajZa0nRgfB2tIJh5lNISg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=chVOT_jRDJKCsAKMubEL&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEHR61218piGIUVAPnS5KXsIukOJg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12745037</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=chVOT_jRDJKCsAKMubEL&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEHR61218piGIUVAPnS5KXsIukOJg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7OtNT8OfKIWqsALvpLUK&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHd4SI7mXiQuGsK7I94V8Eg-dqhBg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12741445</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7OtNT8OfKIWqsALvpLUK&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHd4SI7mXiQuGsK7I94V8Eg-dqhBg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hM5NT6zKLonksQLb_cX_Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHd--5XgLGPi757U2wOhJjTMb_lNw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12741110</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hM5NT6zKLonksQLb_cX_Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHd--5XgLGPi757U2wOhJjTMb_lNw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C8FNT8zqPOrHsQLi34gb&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHaPp1Grw1NGxZ9a-sEF9g7nTOOdg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12740092</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C8FNT8zqPOrHsQLi34gb&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHaPp1Grw1NGxZ9a-sEF9g7nTOOdg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=15ZNT4DZFIWKsALD1uwb&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEcJMYVzsslQMXr6U8dObxK_kuGfg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12736118</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=15ZNT4DZFIWKsALD1uwb&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEcJMYVzsslQMXr6U8dObxK_kuGfg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sWxNT-6UFa6DsAKRltgR&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFc3KSc0bYubnIP8GFGTvC3n4RUEg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12733156</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=sWxNT-6UFa6DsAKRltgR&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFc3KSc0bYubnIP8GFGTvC3n4RUEg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dkJNT_quHJDrgQfrjZ3KAg&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9ygL2JQ2FZfE8FnyClmhzXK2Mkg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12728262</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dkJNT_quHJDrgQfrjZ3KAg&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH9ygL2JQ2FZfE8FnyClmhzXK2Mkg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1CZNT4CAHLHfsQLM9fEH&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHJpu5_Nd3AcVM_AdrRK-g8VStcw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12724591</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1CZNT4CAHLHfsQLM9fEH&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHHJpu5_Nd3AcVM_AdrRK-g8VStcw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PBhNT8K7LNHIsQLNmJkT&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVwpqL_KkcN-xwNWHL3bUDQihjPg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12721679</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PBhNT8K7LNHIsQLNmJkT&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVwpqL_KkcN-xwNWHL3bUDQihjPg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=D-9MT4_kGLCrsAKtoJn6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFN-dk18uwLBYOJxoZgEB9aWq5f8w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12710309</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=D-9MT4_kGLCrsAKtoJn6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFN-dk18uwLBYOJxoZgEB9aWq5f8w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=V9JMT7S3IIj7sQKP9tke&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGevHmt3b77cBPkfKpp60eCSIgPuA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12706665</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=V9JMT7S3IIj7sQKP9tke&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGevHmt3b77cBPkfKpp60eCSIgPuA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0cNMT4bWAqiHsAKvsq0U&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF6-jit73XdYGzRAUEgg_lpLqwaxg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12704894</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0cNMT4bWAqiHsAKvsq0U&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF6-jit73XdYGzRAUEgg_lpLqwaxg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=85pMT7e8O--psAKYo9QZ&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH73J0XyeLgtQZvJFX2sxMz3cctiQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12701810</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=85pMT7e8O--psAKYo9QZ&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH73J0XyeLgtQZvJFX2sxMz3cctiQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gH5MT-SGIYz2sQKP4YDHBw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFSbgl3y-tJbQvRuOGcIcghSgvMfA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12701517</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gH5MT-SGIYz2sQKP4YDHBw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFSbgl3y-tJbQvRuOGcIcghSgvMfA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pm9MT8G5NqmasgKX--0T&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESvm8Hf9eiZsf4-B5_o1yTxXUtog" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12700506</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Pm9MT8G5NqmasgKX--0T&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESvm8Hf9eiZsf4-B5_o1yTxXUtog&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SUVMT9fqNeT_sQLl2_H6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHlpDtsNuMHgwII91cqbizayz7qBQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12697097</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SUVMT9fqNeT_sQLl2_H6Dw&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHlpDtsNuMHgwII91cqbizayz7qBQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NBtMT7X6Fs3jsQKhm70L&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEu3yw5oi5WpKybYfwEfddKxTl-rA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12695744</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NBtMT7X6Fs3jsQKhm70L&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEu3yw5oi5WpKybYfwEfddKxTl-rA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zfBLT8_eJ6uDsgKR9PnqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMrOSyArxxbxfhahHXokAwBPsIWQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12690876</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zfBLT8_eJ6uDsgKR9PnqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMrOSyArxxbxfhahHXokAwBPsIWQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=59VLT5HOA-rHsQKt5umtAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_epmUpDO6QoKU_yL7JNZvFY-XYA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12687227</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=59VLT5HOA-rHsQKt5umtAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE_epmUpDO6QoKU_yL7JNZvFY-XYA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ncZLT82gB7OGsgLlot3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPJ4B9sc8CxQeLgTidM-zZyuG6qA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12684277</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ncZLT82gB7OGsgLlot3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPJ4B9sc8CxQeLgTidM-zZyuG6qA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U51LT5iqNKWusAKR4fDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJFCDICmgFr9zu0G8k4P2ENDclZg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12672918</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=U51LT5iqNKWusAKR4fDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJFCDICmgFr9zu0G8k4P2ENDclZg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rHpLT5KUJI74sQL_6vXqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFOjZkQjE9vF5YA1a55oBn-m9gcRw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12668395</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rHpLT5KUJI74sQL_6vXqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFOjZkQjE9vF5YA1a55oBn-m9gcRw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PnJLT77JBfOpsALxounqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF2OzOLL1TYv-hi6BvsRYio08eoAA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12667249</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PnJLT77JBfOpsALxounqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF2OzOLL1TYv-hi6BvsRYio08eoAA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ekhLT-bvDYj9sQLa5MDXDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFGrwUojivSYdhc1oRtkhJE3W90Hw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12663627</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ekhLT-bvDYj9sQLa5MDXDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFGrwUojivSYdhc1oRtkhJE3W90Hw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bSxLT4O_M6yAsgKK-_DqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6gOipXk6HT1acxrj5EE8basexjg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12663378</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bSxLT4O_M6yAsgKK-_DqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6gOipXk6HT1acxrj5EE8basexjg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vh1LT7ehAtTCsQKL3_XqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXzmRJZN-qpgTwPDSShypJm7LAiA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12662376</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vh1LT7ehAtTCsQKL3_XqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFXzmRJZN-qpgTwPDSShypJm7LAiA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rfNKT_bvJsvjsQKktuzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE2wbNJaG654iyhp9bZYNFLcDtawg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12659373</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rfNKT_bvJsvjsQKktuzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE2wbNJaG654iyhp9bZYNFLcDtawg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fslKT7PBJ4eAsgKx7PTqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFeqqeNl-AlH1DX9SffhyzKhrqhg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12658669</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fslKT7PBJ4eAsgKx7PTqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFeqqeNl-AlH1DX9SffhyzKhrqhg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Qp9KT4P8PIyGsgKp35HrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFl8jwDIyFwFlXKD28CAwhNTG_og" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12654097</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Qp9KT4P8PIyGsgKp35HrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFFl8jwDIyFwFlXKD28CAwhNTG_og&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=D4JKT9TwFpOssALnsvTqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmIkH6T9CpqHlSuyL4_j_6N0ysJg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12650018</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=D4JKT9TwFpOssALnsvTqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmIkH6T9CpqHlSuyL4_j_6N0ysJg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GXVKT4KrDYH0sQK0xd3FBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjm-5tyvSIOdfB5zW8_l76V3_B0A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12647342</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GXVKT4KrDYH0sQK0xd3FBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGjm-5tyvSIOdfB5zW8_l76V3_B0A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J0tKT4WOBaP4sQLj7u3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8PA_eVHcFEL-ti24nSn1EURZBNw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12635546</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J0tKT4WOBaP4sQLj7u3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8PA_eVHcFEL-ti24nSn1EURZBNw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iyhKT4KMDamlsAK2mvzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLIMp4O7QZS9f2AXFv_k6zODIZ8w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12630886</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iyhKT4KMDamlsAK2mvzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLIMp4O7QZS9f2AXFv_k6zODIZ8w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tSBKT-3MCeL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjViDCPsYkK3QGV_ThL6msaYW_mg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12629825</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tSBKT-3MCeL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHjViDCPsYkK3QGV_ThL6msaYW_mg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0fZJT9LeNcOGsgKho_TqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIViq4FjRnaVm9kfsxvmv1gTFDFA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12626073</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0fZJT9LeNcOGsgKho_TqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEIViq4FjRnaVm9kfsxvmv1gTFDFA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g9tJT9z6IPPMsQLGuPDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVJvNiIoJZ2SR17JKFusrGuoli4g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12625810</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=g9tJT9z6IPPMsQLGuPDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVJvNiIoJZ2SR17JKFusrGuoli4g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P8xJT9SpKrDKsQKP2YjrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbn5dI9dDP2XvktVKQjOAwF0PZSw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12624744</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P8xJT9SpKrDKsQKP2YjrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbn5dI9dDP2XvktVKQjOAwF0PZSw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JaJJT7i8HcfhsQKksITrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFpeZ0MrX1Z9-Ttw4kJS2efksq_4Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12621566</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JaJJT7i8HcfhsQKksITrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFpeZ0MrX1Z9-Ttw4kJS2efksq_4Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7XdJT9GbAsWssQKKkOTqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGaHbsaJa58xRlxwW2EfQflUIIfxw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12620307</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7XdJT9GbAsWssQKKkOTqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGaHbsaJa58xRlxwW2EfQflUIIfxw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wk1JT7TtCcXMsQKsu_HqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHYjVEwXSp69Bl4J5WO9-v3cHt7KQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12615318</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wk1JT7TtCcXMsQKsu_HqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHYjVEwXSp69Bl4J5WO9-v3cHt7KQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OzJJT7-ZM6OssQLTw-3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfandJVyNBSQtilWAikblIxqXPWA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12611497</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OzJJT7-ZM6OssQLTw-3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFfandJVyNBSQtilWAikblIxqXPWA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kyNJT5_DDYH5sQKfn_jzCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGtLWp6I79jCkWrSLCN5LTpQjYfnQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12608483</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kyNJT5_DDYH5sQKfn_jzCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGtLWp6I79jCkWrSLCN5LTpQjYfnQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zflIT5_ILoT_sQLRyKHzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGMzZbpfb3lvE30nOXz7MA7F4qLnQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12596594</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zflIT5_ILoT_sQLRyKHzAw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGMzZbpfb3lvE30nOXz7MA7F4qLnQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KNZIT4LQN430sQKiv5TrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHr4sTovuqwRfu0zbhIusKrpslnBw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12592435</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KNZIT4LQN430sQKiv5TrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHr4sTovuqwRfu0zbhIusKrpslnBw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OM9IT6L0HKyAsgKK-_DqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHuka8QJRLWHLWQfg76XHMYTfUONQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12591496</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OM9IT6L0HKyAsgKK-_DqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHuka8QJRLWHLWQfg76XHMYTfUONQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=k6VIT6mAApKNsALpx6zmCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG0JOPKfRAZHjURxTapeleZkxh7IQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12587656</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=k6VIT6mAApKNsALpx6zmCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG0JOPKfRAZHjURxTapeleZkxh7IQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NIxIT8S-Oc-LsAKq3_XqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEhvkrv7RZbXaumswHGkaJ0jOY80Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12587404</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NIxIT8S-Oc-LsAKq3_XqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEhvkrv7RZbXaumswHGkaJ0jOY80Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=33pIT4bGAuL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHpCX18tvWOLm-_-W8BxBbf-YdGng" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12586305</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=33pIT4bGAuL-sQLUpO3qCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHpCX18tvWOLm-_-W8BxBbf-YdGng&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVBIT_KvOYaFsALAwPjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFoL1xs4S2TTBmg69RWg0l8Vckhrw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12582530</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wVBIT_KvOYaFsALAwPjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFoL1xs4S2TTBmg69RWg0l8Vckhrw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eSZIT7XQJMWGsgKs04jrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhQ9yKNi7PA2j4YnrFt6evqd-qrw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12580439</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eSZIT7XQJMWGsgKs04jrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhQ9yKNi7PA2j4YnrFt6evqd-qrw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WfxHT7SSLunKsQLtobWdBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMrSE8m-NvqLOxa-axEDVuv8tJ9g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12575469</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WfxHT7SSLunKsQLtobWdBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMrSE8m-NvqLOxa-axEDVuv8tJ9g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KuZHT_n-GabisQLr1unqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFptgHSc7_pGoixbQuMxnsgNkPLlQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12572645</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KuZHT_n-GabisQLr1unqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFptgHSc7_pGoixbQuMxnsgNkPLlQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M9JHT6j2C-fnsQKEpOnqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrrHz64rJnHNkZttOMhpmzVDvWWA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12569207</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=M9JHT6j2C-fnsQKEpOnqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrrHz64rJnHNkZttOMhpmzVDvWWA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=46hHT5aVMPPMsQLGuPDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGCPyKXWk21AYXhfVliD0rEYTp2xw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12557651</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=46hHT5aVMPPMsQLGuPDqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGCPyKXWk21AYXhfVliD0rEYTp2xw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6oFHT7GXKc6ztwec4dSfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQPzHZfxhJzIVkDBMEAdcU3YT_CQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12552988</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6oFHT7GXKc6ztwec4dSfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQPzHZfxhJzIVkDBMEAdcU3YT_CQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wH1HT66iMMe9gAfKnrmmDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNENds3SRl4flDRqYVB13KIkTZA6hA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12552436</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wH1HT66iMMe9gAfKnrmmDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNENds3SRl4flDRqYVB13KIkTZA6hA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01NHT7uBNfLFsQLXwtjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGl1dqOnNHHIGBVG5LoTcJq_AvYZQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12548177</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=01NHT7uBNfLFsQLXwtjqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGl1dqOnNHHIGBVG5LoTcJq_AvYZQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FzRHT5ySB8uosALXmJHrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUHaAqJc4HX1l-qhUQwuzUERNY7Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12547360</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FzRHT5ySB8uosALXmJHrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUHaAqJc4HX1l-qhUQwuzUERNY7Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QylHT83TLYaosQLipenqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNglEPYMOi56IQbNoP5rceA8OZCA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12546777</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QylHT83TLYaosQLipenqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNglEPYMOi56IQbNoP5rceA8OZCA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mf9GT7-HG8qwsAK3ndzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzTWQ3PNP1Z_CngeH4I9ZIHlkTUA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12543044</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mf9GT7-HG8qwsAK3ndzqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFzTWQ3PNP1Z_CngeH4I9ZIHlkTUA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EtVGT_2-B6WlsALDosXqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwqrvesQlmNk2uEyxJy76a5nYQWw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12540969</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EtVGT_2-B6WlsALDosXqCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEwqrvesQlmNk2uEyxJy76a5nYQWw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=36pGT-uANommgweI0sGlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzuM422DO7uwOAXI_zCi4VZbXwNg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12535909</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=36pGT-uANommgweI0sGlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzuM422DO7uwOAXI_zCi4VZbXwNg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r49GT4neEYTbggfvmI2TDg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE27BMUlq35OdMheU7OCrhBZacCPw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12532103</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r49GT4neEYTbggfvmI2TDg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE27BMUlq35OdMheU7OCrhBZacCPw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p4BGT-KWGdH0ggfbv8iLDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9Y7-oyvt1PakDyb3m1lhSCN3fww" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12529066</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p4BGT-KWGdH0ggfbv8iLDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9Y7-oyvt1PakDyb3m1lhSCN3fww&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7FZGT9DSAoW0gwehk6nvDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFznNhGuXpJVYwq9z8WTF-7ORSY9A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12517416</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=7FZGT9DSAoW0gwehk6nvDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFznNhGuXpJVYwq9z8WTF-7ORSY9A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fjFGT7W-D46HsALjiJD1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHYOiVvtoChrBf6dts1B_3e3MXoFA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12513737</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fjFGT7W-D46HsALjiJD1Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHYOiVvtoChrBf6dts1B_3e3MXoFA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PSxGT6CNC9OmsAKz0YjODg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFyXXgO5w3DD12JAnKH2wkQfOrtAg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12513000</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PSxGT6CNC9OmsAKz0YjODg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFyXXgO5w3DD12JAnKH2wkQfOrtAg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dwJGT_-lBsWrsQL1lIXlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmy0_lFO2dgnichaGurSXunatwxg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12508994</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dwJGT_-lBsWrsQL1lIXlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmy0_lFO2dgnichaGurSXunatwxg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=geZFT83oHe_KsQL6ydDCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQyhcx2xdGWx5p9to93qmK4RSqoA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12508731</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=geZFT83oHe_KsQL6ydDCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQyhcx2xdGWx5p9to93qmK4RSqoA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4tdFT4j5OuqEsAKAuLXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGdhHQu1MJqnS6pzSlK5kH5BY9fHg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12507675</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4tdFT4j5OuqEsAKAuLXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGdhHQu1MJqnS6pzSlK5kH5BY9fHg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=t61FT7fcL9TfsQK425TEDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGEcJ4P6DZ6Pd7-ix1pL0QlDv4PRg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12503984</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=t61FT7fcL9TfsQK425TEDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGEcJ4P6DZ6Pd7-ix1pL0QlDv4PRg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dINFT97IFqbEsQL96v3DDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEMF10ec4856CiZCtZrOVICOD5NWA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12501703</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dINFT97IFqbEsQL96v3DDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEMF10ec4856CiZCtZrOVICOD5NWA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RFlFT8LaBeiCsALv66DDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-fJrfca6W0uHv2UjfGbeSE2rmMg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12496709</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RFlFT8LaBeiCsALv66DDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-fJrfca6W0uHv2UjfGbeSE2rmMg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pkRFT5qiDMeQsQLVn43DDw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG--W_Fpk4UrErmlnL5-er7aQkHrg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12494135</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pkRFT5qiDMeQsQLVn43DDw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG--W_Fpk4UrErmlnL5-er7aQkHrg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gy9FT7zyCqOJsQKghfTCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHGFjfpfeQCVwM02lLQGn-lluV3nw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12490783</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gy9FT7zyCqOJsQKghfTCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHGFjfpfeQCVwM02lLQGn-lluV3nw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lAVFT6qEJ8SusQLN1YTDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWG85kvsv7N4YE0j_ZwT3fvYZmQQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12479280</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lAVFT6qEJ8SusQLN1YTDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWG85kvsv7N4YE0j_ZwT3fvYZmQQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ueJET_aOJ8X0sQLKn8zCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMXiQRAvIrndC7A8LxpSmS8N44EQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12474770</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ueJET_aOJ8X0sQLKn8zCDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMXiQRAvIrndC7A8LxpSmS8N44EQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tNpET4jiGIuGsgKUtZzDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHe4ufdMaUfPCpuNAk4GNDiZ4BHog" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12473719</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=tNpET4jiGIuGsgKUtZzDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHe4ufdMaUfPCpuNAk4GNDiZ4BHog&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6LBET_mqIejlsQKnts3CDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXpxuykAbc9YwZct5tHmwIXxohtQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12470049</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6LBET_mqIejlsQKnts3CDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGXpxuykAbc9YwZct5tHmwIXxohtQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0ZRET6CXLe-rsAKOqYTDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3RD7syUbRnels24_IYOrew1Bcmw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12469795</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0ZRET6CXLe-rsAKOqYTDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3RD7syUbRnels24_IYOrew1Bcmw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QIZET5PBGuHksQLx6IHDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE64wmiTzv6OPoejKJFj4GT_Cv_HQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12468812</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QIZET5PBGuHksQLx6IHDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE64wmiTzv6OPoejKJFj4GT_Cv_HQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OlxET6L6KtOlsALUsIXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEZ6MnI6aCNZzcpvwxmA5qXQ7Ou-Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12465175</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=OlxET6L6KtOlsALUsIXDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEZ6MnI6aCNZzcpvwxmA5qXQ7Ou-Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8DFET4y4FI6GsgLUuYDDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLm4DjhzA2niaBjRqg0iNTJS10yQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12464400</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8DFET4y4FI6GsgLUuYDDDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFLm4DjhzA2niaBjRqg0iNTJS10yQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2wdET8f5Mabe2AXI1qWZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQo59OkPVcyQYZf1Yf1Fyd5S_KeA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12460131</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2wdET8f5Mabe2AXI1qWZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQo59OkPVcyQYZf1Yf1Fyd5S_KeA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-epDT7qyOITM2AWmpZHSCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHIr3Hsba5kJHqO2GVhUZcV8a8j8A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12456201</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-epDT7qyOITM2AWmpZHSCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHIr3Hsba5kJHqO2GVhUZcV8a8j8A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m91DT93DBMno2AXU-qHSBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHBbC1GogFkBeBp0I_pdpSvr-REyA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12453554</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m91DT93DBMno2AXU-qHSBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHBbC1GogFkBeBp0I_pdpSvr-REyA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QbRDT53oBY_vggeskbCGCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUPegTsq7YRLxvoSH_gG2cKqkpjQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12441746</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QbRDT53oBY_vggeskbCGCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUPegTsq7YRLxvoSH_gG2cKqkpjQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UolDT4mBE8a2gwf-nO2FDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFa4eZETgSdSFDmx9PCYMOyXi1UzA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12436392</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UolDT4mBE8a2gwf-nO2FDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFa4eZETgSdSFDmx9PCYMOyXi1UzA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pIdDT7yiJoPoggf4yNGYCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEcRiq-FSFM4jl3-cICFWexYzp4Wg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12436122</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pIdDT7yiJoPoggf4yNGYCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEcRiq-FSFM4jl3-cICFWexYzp4Wg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EF9DT8HRDeea2AWW6dSTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFx2IN9sAcom6i068ClBAVvz8UwLg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12431474</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EF9DT8HRDeea2AWW6dSTCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFx2IN9sAcom6i068ClBAVvz8UwLg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DURDT8bDO6yA2QX74IiQCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVNaI9JcQxZTQDU5OMNRbNEBfu9A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12431211</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DURDT8bDO6yA2QX74IiQCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVNaI9JcQxZTQDU5OMNRbNEBfu9A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2DRDT6X6IISy2QWwsLSiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFmF0t0tS2aLcCYwfSdHcRUhDIcYg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12430311</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2DRDT6X6IISy2QWwsLSiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFmF0t0tS2aLcCYwfSdHcRUhDIcYg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8QpDT_LsMaTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESsGn4Nx9C1T9W7xpJNlf-Q7s81w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12426980</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8QpDT_LsMaTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNESsGn4Nx9C1T9W7xpJNlf-Q7s81w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r-BCT6X1C4iI2gW4p6GvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE-xAlrCZ_Sz23flZwCBHaIJjuGow" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12426526</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=r-BCT6X1C4iI2gW4p6GvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE-xAlrCZ_Sz23flZwCBHaIJjuGow&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W7ZCT_i8HsTC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH01wYIL9rP-PZzDLfwM-dp9N-DTg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12422645</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W7ZCT_i8HsTC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH01wYIL9rP-PZzDLfwM-dp9N-DTg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3pdCT_zFHuPi2QXA14iQCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGguVwo2WGhraDWp_c2YTTBugcnWA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12418506</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3pdCT_zFHuPi2QXA14iQCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGguVwo2WGhraDWp_c2YTTBugcnWA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JYxCT_fGJMbg2AXO66ymCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrpm13-hk6zB-1zzf_X54Ax9HslA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12416218</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JYxCT_fGJMbg2AXO66ymCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFrpm13-hk6zB-1zzf_X54Ax9HslA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UWJCT-zXOqW62gXGpZS0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvQ-i_Blea6QZtgKz8-zeyPqKCbg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12404233</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UWJCT-zXOqW62gXGpZS0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvQ-i_Blea6QZtgKz8-zeyPqKCbg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzdCT_vlOeKC2wXYmcWvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGlXwllWnVu4lhawDLwCFKy5aAq1Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12398575</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzdCT_vlOeKC2wXYmcWvCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGlXwllWnVu4lhawDLwCFKy5aAq1Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xDNCT7ilLofU2AW6oKjCCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiWIkYfmUFa0YpnlLUtQ2kYMRWtw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12397941</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xDNCT7ilLofU2AW6oKjCCw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEiWIkYfmUFa0YpnlLUtQ2kYMRWtw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gQ1CT5WDHqTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHLozAvR0Hnd0foi05Osz1RVWiEOg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12393491</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gQ1CT5WDHqTM2AWe1IyrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHLozAvR0Hnd0foi05Osz1RVWiEOg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nfFBT72AEoGe2AXx4LWUCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF8ksOclGZWSB9Vl7D4N-xWgZLcDQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12393207</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nfFBT72AEoGe2AXx4LWUCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF8ksOclGZWSB9Vl7D4N-xWgZLcDQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R-NBT-igL4XY2QXS7JSDCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1idkYrRRinSei9GgJKoD5sEjL5Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12392261</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R-NBT-igL4XY2QXS7JSDCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH1idkYrRRinSei9GgJKoD5sEjL5Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R7lBT4udNcr02QWD2OGZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQkkUVTnMamyde7fh8_wH1vryFbA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12389157</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=R7lBT4udNcr02QWD2OGZCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQkkUVTnMamyde7fh8_wH1vryFbA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GY9BT-ylPOOQ2QWH_YykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0qtU5UW2D_VxY8pbM0vjzCEE5mQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12389052</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GY9BT-ylPOOQ2QWH_YykCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0qtU5UW2D_VxY8pbM0vjzCEE5mQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5mRBT6bBCKLM2AX_x9H_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERuGwWsTlJy1qtGnZtapoFK3UZ_A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12385077</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5mRBT6bBCKLM2AX_x9H_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERuGwWsTlJy1qtGnZtapoFK3UZ_A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=e0dBT4qXE6a02gXv0pT-Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4lYpm4gfXUwc0RJ3d-j8vqLHIxg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12381197</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=e0dBT4qXE6a02gXv0pT-Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE4lYpm4gfXUwc0RJ3d-j8vqLHIxg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vDpBT-zzH-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEh-XyDxN3HYab9iCzuE7iw-1-Qyw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12378620</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vDpBT-zzH-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEh-XyDxN3HYab9iCzuE7iw-1-Qyw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jhBBT7KhDujo2gWLo92kCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7ViNufuHTWnWTbVnmbfGaDFdssg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12366543</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jhBBT7KhDujo2gWLo92kCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7ViNufuHTWnWTbVnmbfGaDFdssg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XeZAT-DqF4ni2AW7htydCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQ8EkMEU8Of4-DRRVhJrWW2x6K5Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12360831</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XeZAT-DqF4ni2AW7htydCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFQ8EkMEU8Of4-DRRVhJrWW2x6K5Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=peFAT7vED-bc2QWz09moDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0TfRxxmX1XY7yPpcB8HwJZQKflA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12360100</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=peFAT7vED-bc2QWz09moDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0TfRxxmX1XY7yPpcB8HwJZQKflA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-LtAT7u1EqWe2AWK2KybCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEU8luRDCdk720yLCzDn9TQTq6XkA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12355613</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-LtAT7u1EqWe2AWK2KybCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEU8luRDCdk720yLCzDn9TQTq6XkA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aZ9AT5XwB6Li2QXhms2RCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMEa75xQXtehUFK1Yq7ZKkqcioqQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12355321</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aZ9AT5XwB6Li2QXhms2RCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMEa75xQXtehUFK1Yq7ZKkqcioqQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0JFAT66vJMv-2QWH1IGICA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNENpUPhecOP8BhT8y_IuK3bv9wdbw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12354340</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0JFAT66vJMv-2QWH1IGICA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNENpUPhecOP8BhT8y_IuK3bv9wdbw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=52dAT8OWNbPE2QWxwKyfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_OIy4QujRua6U9oiDFbunE1waNw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12350938</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=52dAT8OWNbPE2QWxwKyfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH_OIy4QujRua6U9oiDFbunE1waNw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oz1AT6LMFsLy2QXPpK2DCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEWxUyDVWdU9PPdQR2OBQTT7p8fqQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12350813</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oz1AT6LMFsLy2QXPpK2DCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEWxUyDVWdU9PPdQR2OBQTT7p8fqQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XRNAT8ToJsOg2gXrs_mPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJKU_B_gCsI0xHt1LVpFAMGyCmhA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12346802</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XRNAT8ToJsOg2gXrs_mPCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJKU_B_gCsI0xHt1LVpFAMGyCmhA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=f_Y_T87tGOHo2gXwoem0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFtpk5v-uZ7CYKNYtqj1e_gHltkCg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12342633</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=f_Y_T87tGOHo2gXwoem0CA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFtpk5v-uZ7CYKNYtqj1e_gHltkCg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J-k_T8SzBeiK2wWLv_maCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6_D_zaH6nbiRWNAs8pJ9ElgnKTA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12339908</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J-k_T8SzBeiK2wWLv_maCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6_D_zaH6nbiRWNAs8pJ9ElgnKTA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AL8_T5HWLaeQ2QXO2LywCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4JDVYSliVKXo8afmNWjxKlR29aQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12327630</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=AL8_T5HWLaeQ2QXO2LywCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4JDVYSliVKXo8afmNWjxKlR29aQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vZQ_T_64Iafs2QX-qcCfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZobBz5vkmvWDriCEJsGBke5-UxQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12322018</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vZQ_T_64Iafs2QX-qcCfCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZobBz5vkmvWDriCEJsGBke5-UxQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=npE_T5q6DoPg2AXB5MG2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElcqFB-KiBlbxA-pKOnfcJzNtmlw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12321483</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=npE_T5q6DoPg2AXB5MG2CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElcqFB-KiBlbxA-pKOnfcJzNtmlw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qmo_T6qfMIO42wW59bWVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfIfEsZHLI8_vwFDp7CcX0fot-PA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12316929</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qmo_T6qfMIO42wW59bWVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfIfEsZHLI8_vwFDp7CcX0fot-PA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C08_T6bVLdPq2wXow83QBw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHIcl10AooYeBKB4DtBJndPGgIi4A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12316669</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=C08_T6bVLdPq2wXow83QBw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHIcl10AooYeBKB4DtBJndPGgIi4A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZEA_T-KzIcW42wWj74WiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNExW5EocDXdbp38l6VMI6cQGjkvtQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12315727</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZEA_T-KzIcW42wWj74WiCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNExW5EocDXdbp38l6VMI6cQGjkvtQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eBw_T_mVDLO42QWy7I2oCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-vsq-WXXW7ekkMU0O_XB7ciXs9w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12307373</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eBw_T_mVDLO42QWy7I2oCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF-vsq-WXXW7ekkMU0O_XB7ciXs9w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cuw-T6SqJ-v-2QXlhpyBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZ3zPgbUZuELZQFof3oEjOHwtdhg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12303595</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Cuw-T6SqJ-v-2QXlhpyBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGZ3zPgbUZuELZQFof3oEjOHwtdhg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2cE-T_rUEoW42QXF6LmtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhpXVz-W_ttoMx-L15u8J2eXYI-Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12297794</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2cE-T_rUEoW42QXF6LmtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhpXVz-W_ttoMx-L15u8J2eXYI-Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4qQ-T4aVI6bi2AWj18WJCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0vI7oLAG6aOm_n7Gp7phubXkNgg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12293620</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4qQ-T4aVI6bi2AWj18WJCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0vI7oLAG6aOm_n7Gp7phubXkNgg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rZc-T9zMCcLW2AWWt_WzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGMZ0HQR4mos0mSTINxFLKcMveGyQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12290145</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rZc-T9zMCcLW2AWWt_WzCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGMZ0HQR4mos0mSTINxFLKcMveGyQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Fm4-T_rsAeLE2wXh5KipCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHU7w9AGbczBACMmaBkqsTjsgB86A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12281094</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Fm4-T_rsAeLE2wXh5KipCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHU7w9AGbczBACMmaBkqsTjsgB86A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jUs-T8GNIqPo2AWO7bm4CA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvBZ5lAKmkUSV2idwpQ8LSa81bfA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12279293</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jUs-T8GNIqPo2AWO7bm4CA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvBZ5lAKmkUSV2idwpQ8LSa81bfA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nkM-T5SXE4XI2AX7itDrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF17x7lc_dUIjgClyzoRfqC8MgWMQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12278798</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nkM-T5SXE4XI2AX7itDrDA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF17x7lc_dUIjgClyzoRfqC8MgWMQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mhk-T6-3G8e62gXvremSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGdXZ-bw_ELmCkXGltkXtpwE0yU3A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12274714</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Mhk-T6-3G8e62gXvremSCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGdXZ-bw_ELmCkXGltkXtpwE0yU3A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pv09T8jlO8mW2AW-_KmFCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE52vRHOYSoznmgkAU8dysZE_TX2w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12273235</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=pv09T8jlO8mW2AW-_KmFCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE52vRHOYSoznmgkAU8dysZE_TX2w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gu89T7i-NuKW2QXIx7GrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEeogsCMM9EU8AI-0gGxC160Wd_kQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12271318</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Gu89T7i-NuKW2QXIx7GrCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEeogsCMM9EU8AI-0gGxC160Wd_kQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0sQ9T8fuBcSG2gXvmcyVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHFIWohfNIGF0m6gidvnrYTXPdOaw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12261117</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0sQ9T8fuBcSG2gXvmcyVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHFIWohfNIGF0m6gidvnrYTXPdOaw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lZo9T_H1F8TC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH69gZkdQLufb0Zw5uW3SN30_v7WQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12257490</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lZo9T_H1F8TC2wXyofmmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH69gZkdQLufb0Zw5uW3SN30_v7WQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uHA9T6-CO-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvn9-i55RLHn5_jPMZgK1yUBHfuQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12253882</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uHA9T6-CO-m62wXezvSbCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvn9-i55RLHn5_jPMZgK1yUBHfuQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fVg9T4yvHMfC2wW-wPWmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhTLLM1olAlczyIJSm7hh0P5Bp6g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12251809</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fVg9T4yvHMfC2wW-wPWmCA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFhTLLM1olAlczyIJSm7hh0P5Bp6g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NUY9T-DKBdG_2QWMhpGdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFYORSZxjjrepuI5jezJlWAomufw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12247409</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=NUY9T-DKBdG_2QWMhpGdCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFYORSZxjjrepuI5jezJlWAomufw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HRw9T8_tNsnY2QXc_pmsCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuVjGwyOl6swH65kxp9dm1jS8I1w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12240235</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HRw9T8_tNsnY2QXc_pmsCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGuVjGwyOl6swH65kxp9dm1jS8I1w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8PE8T7PEOYjo2gW4vcCBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVV656d6tKKbaR013VK0rdu8BV3g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12236592</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8PE8T7PEOYjo2gW4vcCBCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVV656d6tKKbaR013VK0rdu8BV3g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_PA8T4jeDOSK2wXBo4WtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFyTU5_IsapmdhobsJWNaXLd9iUw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12236430</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_PA8T4jeDOSK2wXBo4WtCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFyTU5_IsapmdhobsJWNaXLd9iUw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zcc8T8-PBvSr2AWJz4GVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFiuiAZJo_ZhKr6fae-o6MfoacDlw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12232045</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zcc8T8-PBvSr2AWJz4GVCA&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFiuiAZJo_ZhKr6fae-o6MfoacDlw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=q6s8T96FKMXg2QXT4PyICA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVOOd0RW6GxzOqZxkCkVzPQcj-DA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12231766</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=q6s8T96FKMXg2QXT4PyICA&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFVOOd0RW6GxzOqZxkCkVzPQcj-DA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PJ08T7W1Isjq2AXymsD_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEYq_03Q2Z023pFeIaqMm-QKCFTow" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12230810</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PJ08T7W1Isjq2AXymsD_Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEYq_03Q2Z023pFeIaqMm-QKCFTow&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXM8T5zqDuTW2AWI2InzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZBxalHA3FMM-47AJKFCXvWFeSsg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12226098</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXM8T5zqDuTW2AWI2InzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZBxalHA3FMM-47AJKFCXvWFeSsg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6Ug8T93nHqOL2AX6pL3zBg&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEkuIqsPkhCZlbtcIPn4AkZicX5Kw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12225980</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6Ug8T93nHqOL2AX6pL3zBg&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEkuIqsPkhCZlbtcIPn4AkZicX5Kw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vx48T-nFJoLu2gWeibTzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMJANFD4jKnb6PhCY-YCCZhwtbDA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12225844</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vx48T-nFJoLu2gWeibTzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMJANFD4jKnb6PhCY-YCCZhwtbDA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RqA7T5uYFeWZ2QXq2LnzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEyP4Wfaq4beEmeTD5qtJf2VSuhHw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12224868</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=RqA7T5uYFeWZ2QXq2LnzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEyP4Wfaq4beEmeTD5qtJf2VSuhHw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XJo7T5jyB8jE2QWRyanzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFm4AWVboSmOGvkOeEP0muyqxLOwQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12224125</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=XJo7T5jyB8jE2QWRyanzBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFm4AWVboSmOGvkOeEP0muyqxLOwQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXY7T_W0G8fWtgeE-YnMCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0b4go4fAWYONlBje5jMDj8blRew" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12219870</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DXY7T_W0G8fWtgeE-YnMCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF0b4go4fAWYONlBje5jMDj8blRew&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3Fk7T5rQJMPu2gXV6LmlCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELUzcXhNhBCc1FVnT_HL3YB1DOqA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12219601</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3Fk7T5rQJMPu2gXV6LmlCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNELUzcXhNhBCc1FVnT_HL3YB1DOqA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Es7T5iyBKrO2AXVnejMCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHb96b3DBTglDnBWEE7kJfMpCSkJQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12218625</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Es7T5iyBKrO2AXVnejMCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHb96b3DBTglDnBWEE7kJfMpCSkJQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=viE7T-6_Jabg2QXppPSRCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnXsVPUIk_3kcB9JLCVDbjl7p1Yg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12209670</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=viE7T-6_Jabg2QXppPSRCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnXsVPUIk_3kcB9JLCVDbjl7p1Yg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ePc6T5jkMqro2QW75Jm_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnEueR9sCIanhKmauj1lUADAb0vA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12206820</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ePc6T5jkMqro2QW75Jm_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEnEueR9sCIanhKmauj1lUADAb0vA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W806T_qeDYz22AXA-bS5Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE5IsKexzrgRKynzdOSBRHBsgSfdg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12202810</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=W806T_qeDYz22AXA-bS5Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CBwQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE5IsKexzrgRKynzdOSBRHBsgSfdg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SLU6T7rzDMPq2QWdzLDICg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPRMgiVI6kiwC3CBMxxSj6c-Oy0A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12199675</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SLU6T7rzDMPq2QWdzLDICg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFPRMgiVI6kiwC3CBMxxSj6c-Oy0A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LqM6T4_kLab82gXE9LGjCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTLVSrcLjq73ZUWM4rngslfGeexg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12196826</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LqM6T4_kLab82gXE9LGjCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFTLVSrcLjq73ZUWM4rngslfGeexg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-3g6T6bcPOKC2wWmnvDCCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHd51S0rk2pGPkqi9o6s8G4LCrkOA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12186114</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-3g6T6bcPOKC2wWmnvDCCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHd51S0rk2pGPkqi9o6s8G4LCrkOA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yk46T9f4CcOA2QWo1tSXCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH6S24K2qUWcG4AVFq1qGxaFVPl6g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12182305</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=yk46T9f4CcOA2QWo1tSXCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH6S24K2qUWcG4AVFq1qGxaFVPl6g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ikw6T9DoAYb82gWHxPyTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJbrhOzLctstqSq-gCEO1Ay16ngA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12182013</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ikw6T9DoAYb82gWHxPyTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEJbrhOzLctstqSq-gCEO1Ay16ngA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aCQ6T63MG8Ho2gX86L2VCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMGVVxGlQrvcadphglnzGIIgDqBA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12177781</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aCQ6T63MG8Ho2gX86L2VCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHMGVVxGlQrvcadphglnzGIIgDqBA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6wU6T7-cNOns2gXCi_WhCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEMwejCrnIrfZpeFhMAHpBBHUi4fQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12177541</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6wU6T7-cNOns2gXCi_WhCg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEMwejCrnIrfZpeFhMAHpBBHUi4fQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zvo5T7TECabY2gXJlKW_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKchBFhhjJYvxoTY4n56k_s1bJ9w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12176687</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Zvo5T7TECabY2gXJlKW_Cg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKchBFhhjJYvxoTY4n56k_s1bJ9w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O9A5T4yPJ-PY2AWX0N2vCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvVmMPLTeLFkjtIe1sRdosSAWfrQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12172063</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=O9A5T4yPJ-PY2AWX0N2vCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvVmMPLTeLFkjtIe1sRdosSAWfrQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_KU5T9HOCM7E2QWay7WbCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8RbQpR7o8C-MGOI2VR1Wh5XdJ6Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12169318</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_KU5T9HOCM7E2QWay7WbCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH8RbQpR7o8C-MGOI2VR1Wh5XdJ6Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zns5T6GfGtH-2QXc7ozQDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEsxv53KeR-hFRb2IAtrbfJvuz-0A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12164733</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zns5T6GfGtH-2QXc7ozQDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEsxv53KeR-hFRb2IAtrbfJvuz-0A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4Fw5T-2wE9CjsQLiv6GmAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFBv7siFMsy1KYv1JWQ3M9JTWRSIw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12160762</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4Fw5T-2wE9CjsQLiv6GmAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFBv7siFMsy1KYv1JWQ3M9JTWRSIw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rlE5T_yLNIrDsQLI7sCpAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFDw6Aa77gnAMqIYBEzdNFi3SiBKA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12158631</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rlE5T_yLNIrDsQLI7sCpAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFDw6Aa77gnAMqIYBEzdNFi3SiBKA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GCg5T5e3FLLE2QXaiP2EAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFW5hnmON3o7i9nzDDE1Qmfi2N1A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12147487</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=GCg5T5e3FLLE2QXaiP2EAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEFW5hnmON3o7i9nzDDE1Qmfi2N1A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tv04T7TnOoLu2gXj-YWZAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHd4e9aa0e2MALdnFCU2OTLkwUNgQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12142951</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tv04T7TnOoLu2gXj-YWZAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHd4e9aa0e2MALdnFCU2OTLkwUNgQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ffo4T-TzG631sQKD_bH2AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEXIkrjLLZdFa06RNCLni2WBJSMcQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12142511</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ffo4T-TzG631sQKD_bH2AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEXIkrjLLZdFa06RNCLni2WBJSMcQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_NI4T_c5ioKwAtaNpYsC&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3jScVoWvOtiwKoVNfk6cIBhYNCw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12138113</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_NI4T_c5ioKwAtaNpYsC&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG3jScVoWvOtiwKoVNfk6cIBhYNCw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=T7Q4T42XMcqGsgL90JjLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUWtr5U-N_3D2qd6QFCVlDq8nCEg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12137891</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=T7Q4T42XMcqGsgL90JjLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUWtr5U-N_3D2qd6QFCVlDq8nCEg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wKg4T-m8FOqasgKSmMSDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZOPwid2Rl4EGzAkbX_GlKtj7e-w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12137045</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wKg4T-m8FOqasgKSmMSDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFZOPwid2Rl4EGzAkbX_GlKtj7e-w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lX44T7mOB4qW2gWxz5H5AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERFTmnglcaVjNkNLj0Sf6sto_AtQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12129939</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lX44T7mOB4qW2gWxz5H5AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERFTmnglcaVjNkNLj0Sf6sto_AtQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=c1Q4T-_mI-nM2AXPlt2UAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGu7zWtnLG7w20qLUcXcInxG9EDkQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12129815</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=c1Q4T-_mI-nM2AXPlt2UAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGu7zWtnLG7w20qLUcXcInxG9EDkQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SCo4T9CjCMfK2AWj9aTzAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF6S8WrGkX1Aotf2EnhHctXgYrXjA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12129644</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SCo4T9CjCMfK2AWj9aTzAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF6S8WrGkX1Aotf2EnhHctXgYrXjA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aAw4T8DuDYSW2AWn9vH0AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfiZ0EezY-HfVeIf8O0YR44wP0qg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12128716</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aAw4T8DuDYSW2AWn9vH0AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfiZ0EezY-HfVeIf8O0YR44wP0qg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Jjs0T6TzMqqesQLnooX-AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHGJlYovscnAd0babcwzmTB77d-ug" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12127925</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Jjs0T6TzMqqesQLnooX-AQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHGJlYovscnAd0babcwzmTB77d-ug&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uTgzT4qwKKWGsAKJpd2wAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHGV6kqPz77ejbd6CTKPo8km8JNOg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12123529</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=uTgzT4qwKKWGsAKJpd2wAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHGV6kqPz77ejbd6CTKPo8km8JNOg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hg4zT-DMBrSA2QXQ_rTGBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGM48JQzo0rbHvYv0_w8QjE-__sLw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12122031</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hg4zT-DMBrSA2QXQ_rTGBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGM48JQzo0rbHvYv0_w8QjE-__sLw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuQyT67-F-Xo2AXbm4HLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrid3oUPNg4BqABnCTciF2SxK_uw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12117287</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuQyT67-F-Xo2AXbm4HLBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrid3oUPNg4BqABnCTciF2SxK_uw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vsYyT4uOKqSjsQKvpK3qBg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzeR0VTF-qQg83EO0AiBsEZaQb3Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12113225</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vsYyT4uOKqSjsQKvpK3qBg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzeR0VTF-qQg83EO0AiBsEZaQb3Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J7oyT9mlFMKK2wWK9bi7Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHftOC80TRLAMQVPCNfnUJoLp60Wg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12110352</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=J7oyT9mlFMKK2wWK9bi7Bw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHftOC80TRLAMQVPCNfnUJoLp60Wg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=x5AyT8SOB8WzsALO84yxDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-PWTqZE512o_9OpKcO8FvMvKxxA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12098491</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=x5AyT8SOB8WzsALO84yxDA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-PWTqZE512o_9OpKcO8FvMvKxxA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zWUyT4LrA8mpsAKWxPGBBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCFYKUC5_dv5Oz2U8ztl0KZt2Jlw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12093812</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=zWUyT4LrA8mpsAKWxPGBBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFCFYKUC5_dv5Oz2U8ztl0KZt2Jlw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m14yT6TbFcyLsAKEoMXrBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNqE4IZSvCdFZn1pPgEszxhmlLsw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12092787</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m14yT6TbFcyLsAKEoMXrBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNqE4IZSvCdFZn1pPgEszxhmlLsw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjsyT6O2NYXY2QXvvLSxBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvIkYnC0TlBqBnxTgDXb0oDASn0A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12088770</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bjsyT6O2NYXY2QXvvLSxBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEvIkYnC0TlBqBnxTgDXb0oDASn0A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iBwyT7GBCMn3sQKMlZ2FBw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHG37ZQadnj4-61jgwxNc6gqz-vyg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12087872</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=iBwyT7GBCMn3sQKMlZ2FBw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHG37ZQadnj4-61jgwxNc6gqz-vyg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UhEyT5_nJKX9sQKjqeCFBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHgc4o2nU1PBTXPlXqKPv8zHiMuUg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12087162</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=UhEyT5_nJKX9sQKjqeCFBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHgc4o2nU1PBTXPlXqKPv8zHiMuUg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HOcxT5vNOaaIsQKfhpThBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHktOy-BUyNQrU_brjWpQ1EkLT85A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12082956</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HOcxT5vNOaaIsQKfhpThBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHktOy-BUyNQrU_brjWpQ1EkLT85A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A70xT_q7LOmIsgKlhIjnBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzIlxDaVWZlAxPSmh3k5F3U_JMEw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12082793</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=A70xT_q7LOmIsgKlhIjnBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzIlxDaVWZlAxPSmh3k5F3U_JMEw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4ZIxT-_5GZKNsAKT3a2cBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnOePF0WrZpgm3cL2hJzKc26k_Dg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12082576</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4ZIxT-_5GZKNsAKT3a2cBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGnOePF0WrZpgm3cL2hJzKc26k_Dg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=T3QxT6_8G4HE2QWf6_HABw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHpS4kDSyVMMwjnPSrNvTs6g6BfwA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12081592</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel ... Bill&amp;#39;s Views.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=T3QxT6_8G4HE2QWf6_HABw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHpS4kDSyVMMwjnPSrNvTs6g6BfwA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tj8xT4DkCYetsQLFpMHiBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-8AraIkuYuCkThH95-mLRFVVGtw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12076281</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Tj8xT4DkCYetsQLFpMHiBg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-8AraIkuYuCkThH95-mLRFVVGtw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kCMxT-TeO4SPsQKH7MiPBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJjS4okssc5K9XTsA8eUTlnd4wQQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12076146</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=kCMxT-TeO4SPsQKH7MiPBw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJjS4okssc5K9XTsA8eUTlnd4wQQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2iEwT-OyL6aJsQKj9tCgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH2nj_VtcTAeL82SJma7vPQ0Ma38A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12067629</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2iEwT-OyL6aJsQKj9tCgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH2nj_VtcTAeL82SJma7vPQ0Ma38A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KxcwT5z1AcjA2gXf5tiKDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQYdwTkWv2UYcpM5wWcf2V-5nmBQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12065700</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=KxcwT5z1AcjA2gXf5tiKDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGQYdwTkWv2UYcpM5wWcf2V-5nmBQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8uwvT_ylBsSRsALsiN2ADg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKM-PkHCj6bK0WlhZ_c_rf_jwYlw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12053962</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8uwvT_ylBsSRsALsiN2ADg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKM-PkHCj6bK0WlhZ_c_rf_jwYlw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ucIvT9OLJKSCsgLymPyyDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHEuspY9hc-0wbnQLq1BH8Rlnw6xg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12048823</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ucIvT9OLJKSCsgLymPyyDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHEuspY9hc-0wbnQLq1BH8Rlnw6xg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PLQvT8nMK4arsALLvr2SDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtHHCC0FSi3hkzxdSeDRJjaO9VgQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12046558</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PLQvT8nMK4arsALLvr2SDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtHHCC0FSi3hkzxdSeDRJjaO9VgQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bZgvT8PvOebC2wWuy4ThDg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE83v3s6KxrY7ij1C-0xlhmvHWxiA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12043022</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=bZgvT8PvOebC2wWuy4ThDg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE83v3s6KxrY7ij1C-0xlhmvHWxiA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JnkvT_vzDYaE2wXtt-SBDw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1WEAteERd4Z3CMpaGDokQorf7Rg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12042044</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JnkvT_vzDYaE2wXtt-SBDw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE1WEAteERd4Z3CMpaGDokQorf7Rg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Um4vT96RFeWksQKu9ciJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4E-snsCuEvfd9xH4hVIqlb6axAw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12041326</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Um4vT96RFeWksQKu9ciJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF4E-snsCuEvfd9xH4hVIqlb6axAw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FkQvT8nqB8OJsgL56cW-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-TKZbz7iKU6ZiB7mNtm225W5-QA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12038223</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FkQvT8nqB8OJsgL56cW-Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-TKZbz7iKU6ZiB7mNtm225W5-QA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1hkvT6CxE82GsALz-uCdDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEP_nj6XtJFWMTo2SoltunQAgTsiw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12038094</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1hkvT6CxE82GsALz-uCdDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEP_nj6XtJFWMTo2SoltunQAgTsiw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z-8uT6T5Ja7IsQLuuJWjDg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVgw7Xr9Q2mhPX78KQ0s-H7IEIRQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12037963</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=z-8uT6T5Ja7IsQLuuJWjDg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGVgw7Xr9Q2mhPX78KQ0s-H7IEIRQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jMUuT6nkL7Cl2AXO5LnrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGEpzzOYuEZawUde9cI0B_pjNrbfg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12037046</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jMUuT6nkL7Cl2AXO5LnrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGEpzzOYuEZawUde9cI0B_pjNrbfg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=apsuT92DCqfs2QX43Z2ADw&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFjJx8f5X8FMa1v6DasyiqRvz_6DA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12027164</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=apsuT92DCqfs2QX43Z2ADw&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFjJx8f5X8FMa1v6DasyiqRvz_6DA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P3EuT7SlBoPnsQLSq92hDg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE974hzd9eVnnnaX3mboG11jGLg4Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12022365</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P3EuT7SlBoPnsQLSq92hDg&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE974hzd9eVnnnaX3mboG11jGLg4Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gGYuT-DQN-rFsQLDrpXrDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFSOG5RzPLz_o-Xpg8PTdTOkIE7Xg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12021049</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=gGYuT-DQN-rFsQLDrpXrDQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFSOG5RzPLz_o-Xpg8PTdTOkIE7Xg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=30YuT9aRA6LpsQKnzMD_DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhikeDwpH_fMWBXKYeKkErgAiF5Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12017451</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=30YuT9aRA6LpsQKnzMD_DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CC8QmAEwBA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGhikeDwpH_fMWBXKYeKkErgAiF5Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eSguT--tGYOIsgKj-s3-DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJFCL1lQwFNgkJAX1pl3o9opiByQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12016496</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eSguT--tGYOIsgKj-s3-DQ&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJFCL1lQwFNgkJAX1pl3o9opiByQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rhwuT5PqE5SisQL7-aHFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGSefLTN4Pmi2XP3T7oNyXEijLVcA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12015741</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rhwuT5PqE5SisQL7-aHFDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGSefLTN4Pmi2XP3T7oNyXEijLVcA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oPItT9isL9H82gXPr63iDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9FoLvhwz45XIqmBuzcN1Yh9qSPA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12012543</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oPItT9isL9H82gXPr63iDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE9FoLvhwz45XIqmBuzcN1Yh9qSPA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ccgtT-3uBqnA2gX7-P3qDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGi_OCE5pDEPHf-O4D-wa_SgtBHug" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12011699</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ccgtT-3uBqnA2gX7-P3qDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGi_OCE5pDEPHf-O4D-wa_SgtBHug&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TJ4tT-HeBsSRsALsiN2ADg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFb68ZecNEBS-JUBdZzwB1ngKVDNg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12007525</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=TJ4tT-HeBsSRsALsiN2ADg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFb68ZecNEBS-JUBdZzwB1ngKVDNg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qX8tT9CsJua22gX_iayZDw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSpr2-Ayg8P1ySwYB-R-3a1cK7Jg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12002797</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=qX8tT9CsJua22gX_iayZDw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHSpr2-Ayg8P1ySwYB-R-3a1cK7Jg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F3QtT9PDF8H22AWUhqWLDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHTMN5gFXlIlJAVHNZ0OV1WLgXtag" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/12000738</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F3QtT9PDF8H22AWUhqWLDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHTMN5gFXlIlJAVHNZ0OV1WLgXtag&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=60ktT7bEOYfg2QWh3Y2XDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGViCW2W5BCAn8S2Bi_vRH4xNs_lw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11988879</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=60ktT7bEOYfg2QWh3Y2XDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGViCW2W5BCAn8S2Bi_vRH4xNs_lw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wh8tT4uZNoazsAK0vPSJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFr-h0ftAkKxPHKmhQJE2v5aX8T6w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11983371</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wh8tT4uZNoazsAK0vPSJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFr-h0ftAkKxPHKmhQJE2v5aX8T6w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rhctT_y-B6OIsgKM_LGWDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEAchssR69NFIDmPbhPE5Xg8IdS5A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11982198</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=rhctT_y-B6OIsgKM_LGWDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEAchssR69NFIDmPbhPE5Xg8IdS5A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YvUsT57NMs_5sQLUrcy7Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1lmRmsBL6Rwa5V7uMr7qtBpJ_DA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11978350</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=YvUsT57NMs_5sQLUrcy7Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF1lmRmsBL6Rwa5V7uMr7qtBpJ_DA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4NksT-aHFZTJsQKP2LC4Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEaug5XQtOBUKtkxW16KmEOAqKzkw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11978060</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=4NksT-aHFZTJsQKP2LC4Dg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEaug5XQtOBUKtkxW16KmEOAqKzkw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=V8ssT5H0O9HHsQLJm8DBDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEd7lD221HQuc0doTA-Tf0U1m921w" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11976851</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=V8ssT5H0O9HHsQLJm8DBDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEd7lD221HQuc0doTA-Tf0U1m921w&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FKEsT669EPP3sQL_s9WJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHWF1H8pTkyp6X-fJlCP4vFsNJ6Dw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11972739</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=FKEsT669EPP3sQL_s9WJDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHWF1H8pTkyp6X-fJlCP4vFsNJ6Dw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BXcsT9XfBOzhsQKl3dSoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHlnWyzk965NFJdHW00K9Etjwpdow" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11972523</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BXcsT9XfBOzhsQKl3dSoDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHlnWyzk965NFJdHW00K9Etjwpdow&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v0wsT-K8Aqm62gXivNzrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG5Tijd52w7o52-AGYf9otR-4oy-g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11972246</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=v0wsT-K8Aqm62gXivNzrDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG5Tijd52w7o52-AGYf9otR-4oy-g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dC4sT4KKF-WQ2AXK2ICJDw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmHxd_bD1HdLJ1eptoYKCq-DnXVQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11971272</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dC4sT4KKF-WQ2AXK2ICJDw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmHxd_bD1HdLJ1eptoYKCq-DnXVQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SfgrT_DJIMnq2wWh6oCfDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHb_mA-fOiFiJH1W0i77X5L4pO8oA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11963634</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=SfgrT_DJIMnq2wWh6oCfDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHb_mA-fOiFiJH1W0i77X5L4pO8oA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MM4rT_GMJYWQsQLc85WlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGymX2K8PuHOLCN6UbX0YoCZcmGiQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11963470</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MM4rT_GMJYWQsQLc85WlDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGymX2K8PuHOLCN6UbX0YoCZcmGiQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MCspT_DcOYfq2AXw_f28BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGpb2iyLTUW9Jk-AC6QrrSv3sVw1A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11943527</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MCspT_DcOYfq2AXw_f28BQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGpb2iyLTUW9Jk-AC6QrrSv3sVw1A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dh4pT6fYDaGGsgLf2-njAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0kelrMdnzRBrySpPO_7O2oVzr8Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11941746</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dh4pT6fYDaGGsgLf2-njAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE0kelrMdnzRBrySpPO_7O2oVzr8Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8gApT_mBPbSmsQKgzb3nAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-OOFD3H1Us9pweysKgoY_riunEg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11938416</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=8gApT_mBPbSmsQKgzb3nAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG-OOFD3H1Us9pweysKgoY_riunEg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HOEoT97xNaXw2gXXgZnrAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGLxNJRqEqxqKiT8L_mAEx4LYUKZg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11937533</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=HOEoT97xNaXw2gXXgZnrAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGLxNJRqEqxqKiT8L_mAEx4LYUKZg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=y9YoT_ysMfKGsgLFmsSlAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHl8QnDj_8HI3NZ_hL9FPyoFcNTDg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11936881</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=y9YoT_ysMfKGsgLFmsSlAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHl8QnDj_8HI3NZ_hL9FPyoFcNTDg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oqwoT_mXD9K62gWXwMzDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9QbPaVqYIz-nK4MTQZOgJPFTW8Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11932887</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=oqwoT_mXD9K62gWXwMzDAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG9QbPaVqYIz-nK4MTQZOgJPFTW8Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=boIoT7mnHMm_2QXy6um4Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhoLXVQ7jXhScqYNiWVmrxqd10sw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11932742</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=boIoT7mnHMm_2QXy6um4Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhoLXVQ7jXhScqYNiWVmrxqd10sw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=N1goT-f9CoTC2wWxyYDMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfGp8smn-X8IFxM8cokhWKzFhgqA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11930003</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=N1goT-f9CoTC2wWxyYDMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEfGp8smn-X8IFxM8cokhWKzFhgqA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6DooT9ixOcrO2wWil-XnAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbBTWR5CjrFLFbEnAR8ydhR81IkQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11926015</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=6DooT9ixOcrO2wWil-XnAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHbBTWR5CjrFLFbEnAR8ydhR81IkQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_y0oT7eWFIrCsQKVkfW_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGu6DeyrKshuWXoGGb4rY6izCTfag" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11923127</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_y0oT7eWFIrCsQKVkfW_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGu6DeyrKshuWXoGGb4rY6izCTfag&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3AMoT4F4pKDYBZOPybcC&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElpsNcYJLo2zxg2N-XZczk7CZy1g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11910536</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3AMoT4F4pKDYBZOPybcC&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElpsNcYJLo2zxg2N-XZczk7CZy1g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m9knT5zJLojo2gXjzaG5Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH4zZPLpDph0moSaFBapmg4S5YDFw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11905301</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m9knT5zJLojo2gXjzaG5Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH4zZPLpDph0moSaFBapmg4S5YDFw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aMgnT-X9N8uKsAKynY3jAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGn9fzLJZUJcjGeAbhkBAFJpHXbdw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11902547</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=aMgnT-X9N8uKsAKynY3jAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGn9fzLJZUJcjGeAbhkBAFJpHXbdw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Wq8nT4GpOY382gWf5Z3fAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVbdfvLjiiSGqoIvCKou6mKPywkA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11899380</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Wq8nT4GpOY382gWf5Z3fAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEVbdfvLjiiSGqoIvCKou6mKPywkA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_pAnT9vAOMSbsgKvr7CkAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECJKvg5JxPvj2AqeeIqXEq45VDIA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11898306</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=_pAnT9vAOMSbsgKvr7CkAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNECJKvg5JxPvj2AqeeIqXEq45VDIA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PoUnT4jVF-OIsQKf2K39Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmSCjfqTpw2IaNXMLK9FNk102oHA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11897483</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=PoUnT4jVF-OIsQKf2K39Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGmSCjfqTpw2IaNXMLK9FNk102oHA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-FonT6WoGMma2gX6zsTCAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHs_CFMaM-LtNAz5atJ6eFsqY-j8g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11892995</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=-FonT6WoGMma2gX6zsTCAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHs_CFMaM-LtNAz5atJ6eFsqY-j8g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xTAnT4iUBeT02wWq3ey_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHnDkiBNrMsALZEIazC93U9tvL4Tg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11892869</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xTAnT4iUBeT02wWq3ey_Ag&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHnDkiBNrMsALZEIazC93U9tvL4Tg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lQYnT5vhMOf4sQK_gt2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEoJOiMxlWgOQU-6YBTJiIMtFobWg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11892743</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=lQYnT5vhMOf4sQK_gt2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEoJOiMxlWgOQU-6YBTJiIMtFobWg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=D-gmT4_hN4eAsgLjpdmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfKP1ArnMIJkYrvEImLHAJsCqucw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11891757</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=D-gmT4_hN4eAsgLjpdmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGfKP1ArnMIJkYrvEImLHAJsCqucw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9wmT-XwEuSusAKRs72NAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGynEkrQhEneAFY308eQZFeh3f54A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11890996</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=h9wmT-XwEuSusAKRs72NAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGynEkrQhEneAFY308eQZFeh3f54A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ULImT5n7FaiLsgL-mcmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG44AAjYssap5WdJzdroDwZXIEGIg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11888255</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ULImT5n7FaiLsgL-mcmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG44AAjYssap5WdJzdroDwZXIEGIg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JIgmT_XmEKrJsQLj_aiMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7RhZQz-tRgO98Bcy1QcVLJ0N3dg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11882875</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=JIgmT_XmEKrJsQLj_aiMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7RhZQz-tRgO98Bcy1QcVLJ0N3dg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BHYmT4PGDJSosAL5zKyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYBQR6CzWGMaDjk5AzTVaXAnFRHg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11879956</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BHYmT4PGDJSosAL5zKyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQmAEwAw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFYBQR6CzWGMaDjk5AzTVaXAnFRHg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1V0mT-H_G-XLsQK9n9yMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZ1xszeADN3DyJ_f_mn2Apo2nXEA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11876808</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=1V0mT-H_G-XLsQK9n9yMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCEQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHZ1xszeADN3DyJ_f_mn2Apo2nXEA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cD8mT-bGNurnsQK40OGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFoh3LnLqtjJ75A_31trWZElTJnuw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11875795</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cD8mT-bGNurnsQK40OGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFoh3LnLqtjJ75A_31trWZElTJnuw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzMmT5PhLu2gsQKG-PGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHULC0N_GYVXIAZpac-yeqXTJ3DVw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11874975</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzMmT5PhLu2gsQKG-PGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHULC0N_GYVXIAZpac-yeqXTJ3DVw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eQkmT4OPGYavsALR5KWMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHVT0Vhb3Z07IbC7ZicpncomkZ_Pw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11871721</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=eQkmT4OPGYavsALR5KWMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHVT0Vhb3Z07IbC7ZicpncomkZ_Pw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=at8lT9_3CcO3sQKW-cCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHwYwbzOimMKjltDplb-pbn8664hQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11871592</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=at8lT9_3CcO3sQKW-cCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHwYwbzOimMKjltDplb-pbn8664hQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MbUlT6XhDMmHsAKntqCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFpdWPDpMru8LJbXwXPyhZPIGeSiw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11869250</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=MbUlT6XhDMmHsAKntqCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFpdWPDpMru8LJbXwXPyhZPIGeSiw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wpYlT86_MPL2sQKd8NiMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5TIUqcJwWDT67nb4W6iryX5hZCA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11864540</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wpYlT86_MPL2sQKd8NiMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH5TIUqcJwWDT67nb4W6iryX5hZCA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DIslT4u1K-GtsQLvqKCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHDnQlnsvXybwcQ0b5hAW35A04FxQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11862156</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DIslT4u1K-GtsQLvqKCMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHDnQlnsvXybwcQ0b5hAW35A04FxQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WAlT8bkDsuKsAKn8OmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUjb9Zg5OQ_KUrWRXkz-_39AYEvw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11849831</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2WAlT8bkDsuKsAKn8OmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGUjb9Zg5OQ_KUrWRXkz-_39AYEvw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzYlT8H5DIqvsALLq9GMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7GannQkbtH2CAazBkJWS8ojEsNg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11844329</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vzYlT8H5DIqvsALLq9GMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG7GannQkbtH2CAazBkJWS8ojEsNg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZiUlT_2KN-rCsQLXse2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF8Ub-8MbItFQezv5B_MxbrBjtwNA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11841766</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ZiUlT_2KN-rCsQLXse2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF8Ub-8MbItFQezv5B_MxbrBjtwNA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WgwlT97EO4OxsALrz4mNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPPN8CIL3Na3ROAWBT8J1HiGHcMA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11838638</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WgwlT97EO4OxsALrz4mNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHPPN8CIL3Na3ROAWBT8J1HiGHcMA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Eu4kT5TbDIGDsgLvueiMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHq-UNZ9i01sAv9YoCuuBnusLSgpA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11837592</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Eu4kT5TbDIGDsgLvueiMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHq-UNZ9i01sAv9YoCuuBnusLSgpA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuIkT6-6C4yqsALiq5CNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFm3oFSoO4UVWEh6j03Fr7Pvz_cjA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11836754</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QuIkT6-6C4yqsALiq5CNAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFm3oFSoO4UVWEh6j03Fr7Pvz_cjA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F7gkT_PHE4-CsgL25M2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHAKImmJo5sewZWlnxJ-alAtlyhYQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11833268</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=F7gkT_PHE4-CsgL25M2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCYQmAEwAg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHAKImmJo5sewZWlnxJ-alAtlyhYQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Y0kT7jiGauksQLywOyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFbHud1wL35bcA_Ok27ggcdmmtLuA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11833131</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5Y0kT7jiGauksQLywOyMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFbHud1wL35bcA_Ok27ggcdmmtLuA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vmMkT6SaGe2AsgLFkLmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG1bpKw1rKII2PdvvZ3eVxcMdSR7A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11829867</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vmMkT6SaGe2AsgLFkLmMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG1bpKw1rKII2PdvvZ3eVxcMdSR7A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=X0UkT525Jq6FsgKk_aWMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9PY05tEIY8Kx4QPZx9zAjw9_5UA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11825602</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=X0UkT525Jq6FsgKk_aWMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNF9PY05tEIY8Kx4QPZx9zAjw9_5UA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hjkkT6eTEImJsALS7fGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFOUt8hSwdDK_1edW_VxwowTRY7rQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11822972</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=hjkkT6eTEImJsALS7fGMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFOUt8hSwdDK_1edW_VxwowTRY7rQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Xw8kT_yYA6LksQLtkaSMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERlJyS9uE_BlPrGoYTRc__Leo_IQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11810664</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Xw8kT_yYA6LksQLtkaSMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNERlJyS9uE_BlPrGoYTRc__Leo_IQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P-UjT_WYK-mxsAKzoa2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzuSZR7C8fEKGG_0ECo6DeYjzN8A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11805713</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=P-UjT_WYK-mxsAKzoa2MAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHzuSZR7C8fEKGG_0ECo6DeYjzN8A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WdQjT7XWCeSmsQKDtamMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGbDoaU7retkDXNdBcina4h0T4MGA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11803384</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WdQjT7XWCeSmsQKDtamMAg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGbDoaU7retkDXNdBcina4h0T4MGA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3rojT9vTK8Loggf0_MHTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGE1z201IAArbnix5b-VkCthyJmXQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11800244</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=3rojT9vTK8Loggf0_MHTCg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGE1z201IAArbnix5b-VkCthyJmXQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DZ0jT--PAYWFtgfD3JmiCw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHtyA_2i1DjWaRu3jR_zpe6zNjDaA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11800010</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DZ0jT--PAYWFtgfD3JmiCw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHtyA_2i1DjWaRu3jR_zpe6zNjDaA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xZAjT4HkCYT-ggeoi7nhCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGrrSJ4pHa8vEDem8LURGU2LlzVNA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11798991</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=xZAjT4HkCYT-ggeoi7nhCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGrrSJ4pHa8vEDem8LURGU2LlzVNA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m2YjT_GdKMT2ggeokLT7CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHTVAX05S8MbgkF6zRASj2VWb_qZg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11795243</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=m2YjT_GdKMT2ggeokLT7CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHTVAX05S8MbgkF6zRASj2VWb_qZg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cTwjT9vTLsX7ggeD5v3bCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvp2kvL9WLHuaH9w4pkdd46vLu2A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11795112</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=cTwjT9vTLsX7ggeD5v3bCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHvp2kvL9WLHuaH9w4pkdd46vLu2A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QhIjT-yVCoaegwfgtIjnCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsoa3ug2WQ1TJcXGBvpi5_KIU3-A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11791288</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=QhIjT-yVCoaegwfgtIjnCA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHsoa3ug2WQ1TJcXGBvpi5_KIU3-A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0_MiT7SHCMTEsQKlq7GLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEocaxIrm1exEPBmX_joDf0Lo850A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11787191</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=0_MiT7SHCMTEsQKlq7GLCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEocaxIrm1exEPBmX_joDf0Lo850A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EugiT8H5FsmRsAKGp7yOCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6aK7fTt9oZHQIbNa2hsGMbwPCZg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11784506</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=EugiT8H5FsmRsAKGp7yOCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG6aK7fTt9oZHQIbNa2hsGMbwPCZg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5r0iT8rHDKu_2QX_7IngDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGFeIKztB7RfF1D2IfHMvraQpxvMQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11772570</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5r0iT8rHDKu_2QX_7IngDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGFeIKztB7RfF1D2IfHMvraQpxvMQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ppMiT6nGJceisQLvzfWECQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEulS2ofpCCeiLoZDjLvxmqxdz_3A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11768053</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=ppMiT6nGJceisQLvzfWECQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEulS2ofpCCeiLoZDjLvxmqxdz_3A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VYMiT52vMMji2QWBi_XeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgJGsoROFHmqnl6NpFMX92rSoOBw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11765480</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=VYMiT52vMMji2QWBi_XeDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFgJGsoROFHmqnl6NpFMX92rSoOBw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WmkiT7b_OejA2gXAhrXgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGdtBiu4VmqWI1XEGV_abNiQh6lNg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11762335</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WmkiT7b_OejA2gXAhrXgDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGdtBiu4VmqWI1XEGV_abNiQh6lNg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BkwiT7HaJ8masgKShLGGCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtT1THT8GPFhhWBoCxTIUV3XO3mQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11762100</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BkwiT7HaJ8masgKShLGGCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEtT1THT8GPFhhWBoCxTIUV3XO3mQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Kz8iT8SaBMPDsQLD8qi1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvWxQATENrVoHSmT9IXbkha6lTQQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11761011</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=Kz8iT8SaBMPDsQLD8qi1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGvWxQATENrVoHSmT9IXbkha6lTQQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DBUiT_KmNMXy2QXqt5XfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEH6CL25Q1_ytdgy6tDNxUjkjp3xw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11756855</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=DBUiT_KmNMXy2QXqt5XfDg&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEH6CL25Q1_ytdgy6tDNxUjkjp3xw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5OohT965J4Trggf05qT8CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElbgM-ybbSJ9aqkAqeFrwV2hF6TA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11756635</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5OohT965J4Trggf05qT8CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNElbgM-ybbSJ9aqkAqeFrwV2hF6TA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vcAhT7fCIc3hsQLU6PG6CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGoNhXY8ayDSZuue8Ug4awqnKPDhQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11752031</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vcAhT7fCIc3hsQLU6PG6CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGoNhXY8ayDSZuue8Ug4awqnKPDhQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nqIhT8_aJY662gW3l9TeDw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGBr5COFMSuKPS1jCzTMW7UDgrFPA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11747628</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nqIhT8_aJY662gW3l9TeDw&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGBr5COFMSuKPS1jCzTMW7UDgrFPA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jZYhT67gC8WqsQKtqtT_CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHYkA7dfqAmidFTsP8ldMPlUEoA6A" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11744839</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=jZYhT67gC8WqsQKtqtT_CA&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHYkA7dfqAmidFTsP8ldMPlUEoA6A&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WmwhT9HEKMa22gWX9uzxDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYleLqTJbJn_1K7nyDoSJAcDazOw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11732895</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=WmwhT9HEKMa22gWX9uzxDw&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGYleLqTJbJn_1K7nyDoSJAcDazOw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LUIhT_ihB7KnsAK2yqG4CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzn_lQsaJ_JoFGPdSwEQwGOq9YZg" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11728778</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=LUIhT_ihB7KnsAK2yqG4CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGzn_lQsaJ_JoFGPdSwEQwGOq9YZg&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9TEhT9WgO--GsAKk9LCxCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJnRRF-TMl6FjtpCAZRiHtIUOJNQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11726530</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=9TEhT9WgO--GsAKk9LCxCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGJnRRF-TMl6FjtpCAZRiHtIUOJNQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xchT4jJCuissQLS48C1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmzDP2CtclYrJH6OcMXpx6ao7m6Q" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11723537</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=2xchT4jJCuissQLS48C1CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEmzDP2CtclYrJH6OcMXpx6ao7m6Q&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1867: National Defense Authorization Act for ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BP0gT6P5HeGxsAKbq_C8CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEEJmeq3AA8d7bQylXupP4nWkVPzw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11723302</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=BP0gT6P5HeGxsAKbq_C8CQ&amp;amp;ved=0CB0QmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEEJmeq3AA8d7bQylXupP4nWkVPzw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-0gT920Ieb6sQLAysTDCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHM2HUBESgA0ankw9KzpVjhgaEekQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11722181</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=p-0gT920Ieb6sQLAysTDCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHM2HUBESgA0ankw9KzpVjhgaEekQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mcMgT-zrH-KOsQL_prSlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHApln8d1UUCEy2snKwLVG8C9M8qw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11717822</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=mcMgT-zrH-KOsQL_prSlCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHApln8d1UUCEy2snKwLVG8C9M8qw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dJkgT9LOMs_fsQKX5qSYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGioxi97O1R4cr96HuLE8U3qu1NNQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11717673</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd%3Fbill%3Ds112-1867&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=dJkgT9LOMs_fsQKX5qSYCQ&amp;amp;ved=0CCIQmAEwAQ&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNGioxi97O1R4cr96HuLE8U3qu1NNQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1867: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s112-1867" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-11-14:/commentary/11431584</id>
    <updated>2011-11-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the U.S. Congress: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s112-1867&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

