S 197 ISCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

112th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

1st SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

S. 197CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

To improve patient access to health care services and provide improved medical care by reducing the excessive burden the liability system places on the health care delivery system.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

January 26, 2011CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Mr. ENSIGN (for himself, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. VITTER, Mr. BURR, Mr. CORNYN, and Mr. ALEXANDER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and PensionsCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

To improve patient access to health care services and provide improved medical care by reducing the excessive burden the liability system places on the health care delivery system.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘Medical Care Access Protection Act of 2011’ or the ‘MCAP Act’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

(a) Findings-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) EFFECT ON HEALTH CARE ACCESS AND COSTS- Congress finds that our current civil justice system is adversely affecting patient access to health care services, better patient care, and cost-efficient health care, in that the health care liability system is a costly and ineffective mechanism for resolving claims of health care liability and compensating injured patients, and is a deterrent to the sharing of information among health care professionals which impedes efforts to improve patient safety and quality of care.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) EFFECT ON INTERSTATE COMMERCE- Congress finds that the health care and insurance industries are industries affecting interstate commerce and the health care liability litigation systems existing throughout the United States are activities that affect interstate commerce by contributing to the high costs of health care and premiums for health care liability insurance purchased by health care system providers.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) EFFECT ON FEDERAL SPENDING- Congress finds that the health care liability litigation systems existing throughout the United States have a significant effect on the amount, distribution, and use of Federal funds because of--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) the large number of individuals who receive health care benefits under programs operated or financed by the Federal Government;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) the large number of individuals who benefit because of the exclusion from Federal taxes of the amounts spent to provide them with health insurance benefits; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(C) the large number of health care providers who provide items or services for which the Federal Government makes payments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Purpose- It is the purpose of this Act to implement reasonable, comprehensive, and effective health care liability reforms designed to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) improve the availability of health care services in cases in which health care liability actions have been shown to be a factor in the decreased availability of services;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) reduce the incidence of ‘defensive medicine’ and lower the cost of health care liability insurance, all of which contribute to the escalation of health care costs;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) ensure that persons with meritorious health care injury claims receive fair and adequate compensation, including reasonable noneconomic damages;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(4) improve the fairness and cost-effectiveness of our current health care liability system to resolve disputes over, and provide compensation for, health care liability by reducing uncertainty in the amount of compensation provided to injured individuals; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(5) provide an increased sharing of information in the health care system which will reduce unintended injury and improve patient care.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION SYSTEM; ADR- The term ‘alternative dispute resolution system’ or ‘ADR’ means a system that provides for the resolution of health care lawsuits in a manner other than through a civil action brought in a State or Federal court.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) CLAIMANT- The term ‘claimant’ means any person who brings a health care lawsuit, including a person who asserts or claims a right to legal or equitable contribution, indemnity or subrogation, arising out of a health care liability claim or action, and any person on whose behalf such a claim is asserted or such an action is brought, whether deceased, incompetent, or a minor.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) COLLATERAL SOURCE BENEFITS- The term ‘collateral source benefits’ means any amount paid or reasonably likely to be paid in the future to or on behalf of the claimant, or any service, product or other benefit provided or reasonably likely to be provided in the future to or on behalf of the claimant, as a result of the injury or wrongful death, pursuant to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) any State or Federal health, sickness, income-disability, accident, or workers’ compensation law;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) any health, sickness, income-disability, or accident insurance that provides health benefits or income-disability coverage;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(C) any contract or agreement of any group, organization, partnership, or corporation to provide, pay for, or reimburse the cost of medical, hospital, dental, or income disability benefits; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(D) any other publicly or privately funded program.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(4) COMPENSATORY DAMAGES- The term ‘compensatory damages’ means objectively verifiable monetary losses incurred as a result of the provision of, use of, or payment for (or failure to provide, use, or pay for) health care services or medical products, such as past and future medical expenses, loss of past and future earnings, cost of obtaining domestic services, loss of employment, and loss of business or employment opportunities, damages for physical and emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, physical impairment, mental anguish, disfigurement, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of society and companionship, loss of consortium (other than loss of domestic service), hedonic damages, injury to reputation, and all other nonpecuniary losses of any kind or nature. Such term includes economic damages and noneconomic damages, as such terms are defined in this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(5) CONTINGENT FEE- The term ‘contingent fee’ includes all compensation to any person or persons which is payable only if a recovery is effected on behalf of one or more claimants.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(6) ECONOMIC DAMAGES- The term ‘economic damages’ means objectively verifiable monetary losses incurred as a result of the provision of, use of, or payment for (or failure to provide, use, or pay for) health care services or medical products, such as past and future medical expenses, loss of past and future earnings, cost of obtaining domestic services, loss of employment, and loss of business or employment opportunities.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(7) HEALTH CARE GOODS OR SERVICES- The term ‘health care goods or services’ means any goods or services provided by a health care institution, provider, or by any individual working under the supervision of a health care provider, that relates to the diagnosis, prevention, care, or treatment of any human disease or impairment, or the assessment of the health of human beings.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(8) HEALTH CARE INSTITUTION- The term ‘health care institution’ means any entity licensed under Federal or State law to provide health care services (including but not limited to ambulatory surgical centers, assisted living facilities, emergency medical services providers, hospices, hospitals and hospital systems, nursing homes, or other entities licensed to provide such services).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(9) HEALTH CARE LAWSUIT- The term ‘health care lawsuit’ means any health care liability claim concerning the provision of health care goods or services affecting interstate commerce, or any health care liability action concerning the provision of (or the failure to provide) health care goods or services affecting interstate commerce, brought in a State or Federal court or pursuant to an alternative dispute resolution system, against a health care provider or a health care institution regardless of the theory of liability on which the claim is based, or the number of claimants, plaintiffs, defendants, or other parties, or the number of claims or causes of action, in which the claimant alleges a health care liability claim.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(10) HEALTH CARE LIABILITY ACTION- The term ‘health care liability action’ means a civil action brought in a State or Federal Court or pursuant to an alternative dispute resolution system, against a health care provider or a health care institution regardless of the theory of liability on which the claim is based, or the number of plaintiffs, defendants, or other parties, or the number of causes of action, in which the claimant alleges a health care liability claim.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(11) HEALTH CARE LIABILITY CLAIM- The term ‘health care liability claim’ means a demand by any person, whether or not pursuant to ADR, against a health care provider or health care institution, including third-party claims, cross-claims, counter-claims, or contribution claims, which are based upon the provision of, use of, or payment for (or the failure to provide, use, or pay for) health care services, regardless of the theory of liability on which the claim is based, or the number of plaintiffs, defendants, or other parties, or the number of causes of action.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(12) HEALTH CARE PROVIDER-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) IN GENERAL- The term ‘health care provider’ means any person (including but not limited to a physician (as defined by section 1861(r) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(r)), registered nurse, dentist, podiatrist, pharmacist, chiropractor, or optometrist) required by State or Federal law to be licensed, registered, or certified to provide health care services, and being either so licensed, registered, or certified, or exempted from such requirement by other statute or regulation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS- For purposes of this Act, a professional association that is organized under State law by an individual physician or group of physicians, a partnership or limited liability partnership formed by a group of physicians, a nonprofit health corporation certified under State law, or a company formed by a group of physicians under State law shall be treated as a health care provider under subparagraph (A).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(13) MALICIOUS INTENT TO INJURE- The term ‘malicious intent to injure’ means intentionally causing or attempting to cause physical injury other than providing health care goods or services.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(14) NONECONOMIC DAMAGES- The term ‘noneconomic damages’ means damages for physical and emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, physical impairment, mental anguish, disfigurement, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of society and companionship, loss of consortium (other than loss of domestic service), hedonic damages, injury to reputation, and all other nonpecuniary losses of any kind or nature.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(15) PUNITIVE DAMAGES- The term ‘punitive damages’ means damages awarded, for the purpose of punishment or deterrence, and not solely for compensatory purposes, against a health care provider or health care institution. Punitive damages are neither economic nor noneconomic damages.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(16) RECOVERY- The term ‘recovery’ means the net sum recovered after deducting any disbursements or costs incurred in connection with prosecution or settlement of the claim, including all costs paid or advanced by any person. Costs of health care incurred by the plaintiff and the attorneys’ office overhead costs or charges for legal services are not deductible disbursements or costs for such purpose.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(17) STATE- The term ‘State’ means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States, or any political subdivision thereof.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 4. ENCOURAGING SPEEDY RESOLUTION OF CLAIMS.

(a) In General- Except as otherwise provided for in this section, the time for the commencement of a health care lawsuit shall be 3 years after the date of manifestation of injury or 1 year after the claimant discovers, or through the use of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury, whichever occurs first.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) General Exception- The time for the commencement of a health care lawsuit shall not exceed 3 years after the date of manifestation of injury unless the tolling of time was delayed as a result of--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) fraud;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) intentional concealment; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) the presence of a foreign body, which has no therapeutic or diagnostic purpose or effect, in the person of the injured person.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(c) Minors- An action by a minor shall be commenced within 3 years from the date of the alleged manifestation of injury except that if such minor is under the full age of 6 years, such action shall be commenced within 3 years of the manifestation of injury, or prior to the eighth birthday of the minor, whichever provides a longer period. Such time limitation shall be tolled for minors for any period during which a parent or guardian and a health care provider or health care institution have committed fraud or collusion in the failure to bring an action on behalf of the injured minor.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(d) Rule 11 Sanctions- Whenever a Federal or State court determines (whether by motion of the parties or whether on the motion of the court) that there has been a violation of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (or a similar violation of applicable State court rules) in a health care liability action to which this Act applies, the court shall impose upon the attorneys, law firms, or pro se litigants that have violated Rule 11 or are responsible for the violation, an appropriate sanction, which shall include an order to pay the other party or parties for the reasonable expenses incurred as a direct result of the filing of the pleading, motion, or other paper that is the subject of the violation, including a reasonable attorneys’ fee. Such sanction shall be sufficient to deter repetition of such conduct or comparable conduct by others similarly situated, and to compensate the party or parties injured by such conduct.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 5. COMPENSATING PATIENT INJURY.

(a) Unlimited Amount of Damages for Actual Economic Losses in Health Care Lawsuits- In any health care lawsuit, nothing in this Act shall limit the recovery by a claimant of the full amount of the available economic damages, notwithstanding the limitation contained in subsection (b).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Additional Noneconomic Damages-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS- In any health care lawsuit where final judgment is rendered against a health care provider, the amount of noneconomic damages recovered from the provider, if otherwise available under applicable Federal or State law, may be as much as $250,000, regardless of the number of parties other than a health care institution against whom the action is brought or the number of separate claims or actions brought with respect to the same occurrence.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) HEALTH CARE INSTITUTIONS-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) SINGLE INSTITUTION- In any health care lawsuit where final judgment is rendered against a single health care institution, the amount of noneconomic damages recovered from the institution, if otherwise available under applicable Federal or State law, may be as much as $250,000, regardless of the number of parties against whom the action is brought or the number of separate claims or actions brought with respect to the same occurrence.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) MULTIPLE INSTITUTIONS- In any health care lawsuit where final judgment is rendered against more than one health care institution, the amount of noneconomic damages recovered from each institution, if otherwise available under applicable Federal or State law, may be as much as $250,000, regardless of the number of parties against whom the action is brought or the number of separate claims or actions brought with respect to the same occurrence, except that the total amount recovered from all such institutions in such lawsuit shall not exceed $500,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(c) No Discount of Award for Noneconomic Damages- In any health care lawsuit--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) an award for future noneconomic damages shall not be discounted to present value;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) the jury shall not be informed about the maximum award for noneconomic damages under subsection (b);CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) an award for noneconomic damages in excess of the limitations provided for in subsection (b) shall be reduced either before the entry of judgment, or by amendment of the judgment after entry of judgment, and such reduction shall be made before accounting for any other reduction in damages required by law; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(4) if separate awards are rendered for past and future noneconomic damages and the combined awards exceed the limitations described in subsection (b), the future noneconomic damages shall be reduced first.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(d) Fair Share Rule- In any health care lawsuit, each party shall be liable for that party’s several share of any damages only and not for the share of any other person. Each party shall be liable only for the amount of damages allocated to such party in direct proportion to such party’s percentage of responsibility. A separate judgment shall be rendered against each such party for the amount allocated to such party. For purposes of this section, the trier of fact shall determine the proportion of responsibility of each party for the claimant’s harm.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 6. MAXIMIZING PATIENT RECOVERY.

(a) Court Supervision of Share of Damages Actually Paid to Claimants-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) IN GENERAL- In any health care lawsuit, the court shall supervise the arrangements for payment of damages to protect against conflicts of interest that may have the effect of reducing the amount of damages awarded that are actually paid to claimants.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) CONTINGENCY FEES-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) IN GENERAL- In any health care lawsuit in which the attorney for a party claims a financial stake in the outcome by virtue of a contingent fee, the court shall have the power to restrict the payment of a claimant’s damage recovery to such attorney, and to redirect such damages to the claimant based upon the interests of justice and principles of equity.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) LIMITATION- The total of all contingent fees for representing all claimants in a health care lawsuit shall not exceed the following limits:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(i) Forty percent of the first $50,000 recovered by the claimant(s).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(ii) Thirty-three and one-third percent of the next $50,000 recovered by the claimant(s).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(iii) Twenty-five percent of the next $500,000 recovered by the claimant(s).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(iv) Fifteen percent of any amount by which the recovery by the claimant(s) is in excess of $600,000.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Applicability-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) IN GENERAL- The limitations in subsection (a) shall apply whether the recovery is by judgment, settlement, mediation, arbitration, or any other form of alternative dispute resolution.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) MINORS- In a health care lawsuit involving a minor or incompetent person, a court retains the authority to authorize or approve a fee that is less than the maximum permitted under this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(c) Expert Witnesses-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) REQUIREMENT- No individual shall be qualified to testify as an expert witness concerning issues of negligence in any health care lawsuit against a defendant unless such individual--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) except as required under paragraph (2), is a health care professional who--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(i) is appropriately credentialed or licensed in 1 or more States to deliver health care services; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(ii) typically treats the diagnosis or condition or provides the type of treatment under review; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) can demonstrate by competent evidence that, as a result of training, education, knowledge, and experience in the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of the disease or injury which is the subject matter of the lawsuit against the defendant, the individual was substantially familiar with applicable standards of care and practice as they relate to the act or omission which is the subject of the lawsuit on the date of the incident.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) PHYSICIAN REVIEW- In a health care lawsuit, if the claim of the plaintiff involved treatment that is recommended or provided by a physician (allopathic or osteopathic), an individual shall not be qualified to be an expert witness under this subsection with respect to issues of negligence concerning such treatment unless such individual is a physician.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) SPECIALTIES AND SUBSPECIALTIES- With respect to a lawsuit described in paragraph (1), a court shall not permit an expert in one medical specialty or subspecialty to testify against a defendant in another medical specialty or subspecialty unless, in addition to a showing of substantial familiarity in accordance with paragraph (1)(B), there is a showing that the standards of care and practice in the two specialty or subspecialty fields are similar.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(4) LIMITATION- The limitations in this subsection shall not apply to expert witnesses testifying as to the degree or permanency of medical or physical impairment.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 7. ADDITIONAL HEALTH BENEFITS.

(a) In General- The amount of any damages received by a claimant in any health care lawsuit shall be reduced by the court by the amount of any collateral source benefits to which the claimant is entitled, less any insurance premiums or other payments made by the claimant (or by the spouse, parent, child, or legal guardian of the claimant) to obtain or secure such benefits.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Preservation of Current Law- Where a payor of collateral source benefits has a right of recovery by reimbursement or subrogation and such right is permitted under Federal or State law, subsection (a) shall not apply.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(c) Application of Provision- This section shall apply to any health care lawsuit that is settled or resolved by a fact finder.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 8. PUNITIVE DAMAGES.

(a) Punitive Damages Permitted-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) IN GENERAL- Punitive damages may, if otherwise available under applicable State or Federal law, be awarded against any person in a health care lawsuit only if it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that such person acted with malicious intent to injure the claimant, or that such person deliberately failed to avoid unnecessary injury that such person knew the claimant was substantially certain to suffer.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) FILING OF LAWSUIT- No demand for punitive damages shall be included in a health care lawsuit as initially filed. A court may allow a claimant to file an amended pleading for punitive damages only upon a motion by the claimant and after a finding by the court, upon review of supporting and opposing affidavits or after a hearing, after weighing the evidence, that the claimant has established by a substantial probability that the claimant will prevail on the claim for punitive damages.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) SEPARATE PROCEEDING- At the request of any party in a health care lawsuit, the trier of fact shall consider in a separate proceeding--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) whether punitive damages are to be awarded and the amount of such award; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) the amount of punitive damages following a determination of punitive liability.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





If a separate proceeding is requested, evidence relevant only to the claim for punitive damages, as determined by applicable State law, shall be inadmissible in any proceeding to determine whether compensatory damages are to be awarded.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(4) LIMITATION WHERE NO COMPENSATORY DAMAGES ARE AWARDED- In any health care lawsuit where no judgment for compensatory damages is rendered against a person, no punitive damages may be awarded with respect to the claim in such lawsuit against such person.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Determining Amount of Punitive Damages-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) FACTORS CONSIDERED- In determining the amount of punitive damages under this section, the trier of fact shall consider only the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) the severity of the harm caused by the conduct of such party;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) the duration of the conduct or any concealment of it by such party;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(C) the profitability of the conduct to such party;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(D) the number of products sold or medical procedures rendered for compensation, as the case may be, by such party, of the kind causing the harm complained of by the claimant;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(E) any criminal penalties imposed on such party, as a result of the conduct complained of by the claimant; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(F) the amount of any civil fines assessed against such party as a result of the conduct complained of by the claimant.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) MAXIMUM AWARD- The amount of punitive damages awarded in a health care lawsuit may not exceed an amount equal to two times the amount of economic damages awarded in the lawsuit or $250,000, whichever is greater. The jury shall not be informed of the limitation under the preceding sentence.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(c) Liability of Health Care Providers-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) IN GENERAL- A health care provider who prescribes, or who dispenses pursuant to a prescription, a drug, biological product, or medical device approved by the Food and Drug Administration, for an approved indication of the drug, biological product, or medical device, shall not be named as a party to a product liability lawsuit invoking such drug, biological product, or medical device and shall not be liable to a claimant in a class action lawsuit against the manufacturer, distributor, or product seller of such drug, biological product, or medical device.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) MEDICAL PRODUCT- The term ‘medical product’ means a drug or device intended for humans. The terms ‘drug’ and ‘device’ have the meanings given such terms in sections 201(g)(1) and 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321), respectively, including any component or raw material used therein, but excluding health care services.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 9. AUTHORIZATION OF PAYMENT OF FUTURE DAMAGES TO CLAIMANTS IN HEALTH CARE LAWSUITS.

(a) In General- In any health care lawsuit, if an award of future damages, without reduction to present value, equaling or exceeding $50,000 is made against a party with sufficient insurance or other assets to fund a periodic payment of such a judgment, the court shall, at the request of any party, enter a judgment ordering that the future damages be paid by periodic payments in accordance with the Uniform Periodic Payment of Judgments Act promulgated by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Applicability- This section applies to all actions which have not been first set for trial or retrial before the effective date of this Act.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 10. EFFECT ON OTHER LAWS.

(a) General Vaccine Injury-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) IN GENERAL- To the extent that title XXI of the Public Health Service Act establishes a Federal rule of law applicable to a civil action brought for a vaccine-related injury or death--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) this Act shall not affect the application of the rule of law to such an action; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) any rule of law prescribed by this Act in conflict with a rule of law of such title XXI shall not apply to such action.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) EXCEPTION- If there is an aspect of a civil action brought for a vaccine-related injury or death to which a Federal rule of law under title XXI of the Public Health Service Act does not apply, then this Act or otherwise applicable law (as determined under this Act) will apply to such aspect of such action.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Smallpox Vaccine Injury-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) IN GENERAL- To the extent that part C of title II of the Public Health Service Act establishes a Federal rule of law applicable to a civil action brought for a smallpox vaccine-related injury or death--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) this Act shall not affect the application of the rule of law to such an action; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) any rule of law prescribed by this Act in conflict with a rule of law of such part C shall not apply to such action.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) EXCEPTION- If there is an aspect of a civil action brought for a smallpox vaccine-related injury or death to which a Federal rule of law under part C of title II of the Public Health Service Act does not apply, then this Act or otherwise applicable law (as determined under this Act) will apply to such aspect of such action.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(c) Other Federal Law- Except as provided in this section, nothing in this Act shall be deemed to affect any defense available, or any limitation on liability that applies to, a defendant in a health care lawsuit or action under any other provision of Federal law.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 11. STATE FLEXIBILITY AND PROTECTION OF STATES’ RIGHTS.

(a) Health Care Lawsuits- The provisions governing health care lawsuits set forth in this Act shall preempt, subject to subsections (b) and (c), State law to the extent that State law prevents the application of any provisions of law established by or under this Act. The provisions governing health care lawsuits set forth in this Act supersede chapter 171 of title 28, United States Code, to the extent that such chapter--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) provides for a greater amount of damages or contingent fees, a longer period in which a health care lawsuit may be commenced, or a reduced applicability or scope of periodic payment of future damages, than provided in this Act; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) prohibits the introduction of evidence regarding collateral source benefits.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Preemption of Certain State Laws- No provision of this Act shall be construed to preempt any State law (whether effective before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act) that specifies a particular monetary amount of compensatory or punitive damages (or the total amount of damages) that may be awarded in a health care lawsuit, regardless of whether such monetary amount is greater or lesser than is provided for under this Act, notwithstanding section 5(a).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(c) Protection of State’s Rights and Other Laws-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) IN GENERAL- Any issue that is not governed by a provision of law established by or under this Act (including the State standards of negligence) shall be governed by otherwise applicable Federal or State law.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION- Nothing in this Act shall be construed to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) preempt or supersede any Federal or State law that imposes greater procedural or substantive protections (such as a shorter statute of limitations) for a health care provider or health care institution from liability, loss, or damages than those provided by this Act;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) preempt or supercede any State law that permits and provides for the enforcement of any arbitration agreement related to a health care liability claim whether enacted prior to or after the date of enactment of this Act;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(C) create a cause of action that is not otherwise available under Federal or State law; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(D) affect the scope of preemption of any other Federal law.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 12. APPLICABILITY; EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act shall apply to any health care lawsuit brought in a Federal or State court, or subject to an alternative dispute resolution system, that is initiated on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, except that any health care lawsuit arising from an injury occurring prior to the date of enactment of this Act shall be governed by the applicable statute of limitations provisions in effect at the time the injury occurred.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink