S.679 - Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011
A bill to reduce the number of executive positions subject to Senate confirmation.
The following letters were written by OpenCongress.org users and sent to their elected representatives. You can start a letter of your own by clicking the links to right.
-
UN CRPD vote NO!
darkart1
September 21, 2012
I am writing as your constituent in the 6th Congressional district of Georgia.
I oppose Senators Durbin and Harkin trying to get the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities ratified on the floor in a maneuver that can only be called a sneak attack.
Vote "NO" to CRPD! -
S.679 Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011
kingwp
August 27, 2012
I see none of my elected Republican representatives supported this, except for YOU Mr. Shelby.....YOU LOST MY SUPPORT by the way.
I also see that Roby (R), Rogers (R) Bachus (R) and Bonner (R) did vote for it.
What kind of person votes for the so called Republican representatives.
I have said it many times over that you either support the Constitution as a whole or not at all. Those listed above are not upholding their end of the oath. I was not allowed to send them a message, I am requesti... -
S.679 Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011
deste66
August 21, 2012
I oppose S.679 - Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011, and am tracking it using OpenCongress.org, the free public resource website for government transparency and accountability.
-
S.679 Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011
davetaylor6
August 19, 2012
I am writing as your constituent in the 6th Congressional district of Kentucky. I oppose S.679 - Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011, and am tracking it using OpenCongress.org, the free public resource website for government transparency and accountability.
Article II Section 2 of our constitution ( specifically the "Appointments Clause") states "the president shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other ... -
S.679 Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011
Hawlsey
August 09, 2012
I am writing as your constituent in the 3rd Congressional district of North Carolina. I oppose S.679 - Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011, and am tracking it using OpenCongress.org, the free public resource website for government transparency and accountability.
I know the most recent action for this bill is as follows: "Presented to President." on Aug 02, 2012
Sen. Hagan, your most-recent roll call vote on this bill was 'Aye'.
Considering the Constitu... -
S.679 Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011
phasegen
August 06, 2012
I am writing as your constituent in the 24th Congressional district of Texas. In regards to S.679 - Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011.
The fact that constituents aren't informed of bills like this before a vote is deplorable.
To the Honorable Representative Marchant, I would say thank you for your vote, and truly representing your constituents. You and your staff do wonderful work that is very much appreciated.
To Senator Hutchison, good luck with your reti... -
S.679 Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011
constitutionalgovernment
August 03, 2012
I am writing as your constituent in the 4th Congressional district of Mississippi. I oppose S.679 - Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011, and am tracking it using OpenCongress.org, the free public resource website for government transparency and accountability.

U.S. Congress - Letters to Congress: S.679 Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011



