U.S. Congress - S.J.Res.33 A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to e...
S.J.Res.33 - A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to expressly exclude for-profit corporations from the rights given to natural persons by the Constitution of the United States, prohibit corporate spending in all elections, and affirm the authority of Congress and the States to regulate corporations and to regulate and set limits on all election contributions and expenditures.
view all titles (1)All Bill Titles
- Official: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to expressly exclude for-profit corporations from the rights given to natural persons by the Constitution of the United States, prohibit corporate spending in all elections, and affirm the authority of Congress and the States to regulate corporations and to regulate and set limits on all election contributions and expenditures. as introduced.
This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
Sort By
Comments Feed
Where is the hidden bomb for this bill? I want to get ALL donations out of elections. Including PACs and $75,000/plate dinners. But this sounds very one sided. I don’t like it. Something smells very fishy here. Any thoughts?
This is my first opportunity to visit this website. I found some interesting things and I will apply to the development of my blog. Thanks for sharing useful information.
Dissertation
There is no gimmick to the bill shortlittlerebel. This is the answer for Citizens United decision by the Supreme Court allowing Corporate Personhood and unlimited, non-disclosed donations. The whole reason most of the Republican candidates could stay in while everyone knew they were done. The President unfortunately said he would be participating in the unlimited, backroom donations just because the otherside has so much of it. Instead of both parties taking the high road, they decided to take the rubber off and roll on the train tracks.