Version	Word Count	Changes From Previous Version	Percent Change
Placed on Calendar Senate	1,755	n/a	n/a
Engrossed in Senate	1,509	7	20%
Referred in House	1,487	5 Show Changes Hide Changes	3%

Display Version Placed on Calendar Senate Engrossed in Senate Referred in House

SJ 41 ESRFHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

112th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

2d SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

S. J. RES. 41CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

JOINT RESOLUTIONCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the nuclear program of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas, since at least the late 1980s, the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has engaged in a sustained and well-documented pattern of illicit and deceptive activities to acquire nuclear capability;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas the United Nations Security Council has adopted multiple resolutions since 2006 demanding the full and sustained suspension of all uranium enrichment-related and reprocessing activities by the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran and its full cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on all outstanding issues related to its nuclear activities, particularly those concerning the possible military dimensions of its nuclear program;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas, on November 8, 2011, the IAEA issued an extensive report that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) documents ‘serious concerns regarding possible military dimensions to Iran’s nuclear programme’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) states that ‘Iran has carried out activities relevant to the development of a nuclear device’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(3) states that the efforts described in paragraphs (1) and (2) may be ongoing;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas, as of November 2008, Iran had produced, according to the IAEA--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) approximately 630 kilograms of uranium hexaflouride enriched up to 3.5 percent uranium-235; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) no uranium hexaflouride enriched up to 20 percent uranium-235;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas, as of November 2011, Iran had produced, according to the IAEA--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) nearly 5,000 kilograms of uranium hexaflouride enriched up to 3.5 percent uranium-235; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) 79.7 kilograms of uranium hexaflouride enriched up to 20 percent uranium-235;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas, on January 9, 2012, IAEA inspectors confirmed that the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran had begun enrichment activities at the Fordow site, including possibly enrichment of uranium hexaflouride up to 20 percent uranium-235;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas section 2(2) of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-195) states, ‘The United States and other responsible countries have a vital interest in working together to prevent the Government of Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability.’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas if the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran were successful in acquiring a nuclear weapon capability, it would likely spur other countries in the region to consider developing their own nuclear weapons capabilities;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas, on December 6, 2011, Prince Turki al-Faisal of Saudi Arabia stated that if international efforts to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons fail, ‘we must, as a duty to our country and people, look into all options we are given, including obtaining these weapons ourselves’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas top leaders of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran have repeatedly threatened the existence of the State of Israel, pledging to ‘wipe Israel off the map’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas the Department of State has designated Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism since 1984 and characterized Iran as the ‘most active state sponsor of terrorism’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has provided weapons, training, funding, and direction to terrorist groups, including Hamas, Hezbollah, and Shiite militias in Iraq that are responsible for the murders of hundreds of United States forces and innocent civilians;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas, on July 28, 2011, the Department of the Treasury charged that the Government of Iran had forged a ‘secret deal’ with al Qaeda to facilitate the movement of al Qaeda fighters and funding through Iranian territory;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas, in October 2011, senior leaders of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Quds Force were implicated in a terrorist plot to assassinate Saudi Arabia’s Ambassador to the United States on United States soil;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas, on December 26, 2011, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution denouncing the serious human rights abuses occurring in the Islamic Republic of Iran, including torture, cruel and degrading treatment in detention, the targeting of human rights defenders, violence against women, and ‘the systematic and serious restrictions on freedom of peaceful assembly’ as well as severe restrictions on the rights to ‘freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas President Barack Obama, through the P5+1 process, has made repeated efforts to engage the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran in dialogue about Iran’s nuclear program and its international commitments under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, done at Washington, London, and Moscow July 1, 1968, and entered into force March 5, 1970 (commonly known as the ‘Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty’);CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas representatives of the P5+1 countries (the United States, France, Germany, the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation, and the United Kingdom) and representatives of the Islamic Republic of Iran held negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program in Istanbul, Turkey on April 14, 2012, and these discussions are set to resume in Baghdad, Iraq on May 23, 2012;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas, on March 31, 2010, President Obama stated that the ‘consequences of a nuclear-armed Iran are unacceptable’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas in his State of the Union Address on January 24, 2012, President Obama stated, ‘Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal.’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas, on March 4, 2012, President Obama stated ‘Iran’s leaders should understand that I do not have a policy of containment; I have a policy to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta stated, in December 2011, that it was unacceptable for Iran to acquire nuclear weapons, reaffirmed that all options were on the table to thwart Iran’s nuclear weapons efforts, and vowed that if the United States gets ‘intelligence that they are proceeding with developing a nuclear weapon then we will take whatever steps necessary to stop it’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas the Department of Defense’s January 2012 Strategic Guidance stated that United States defense efforts in the Middle East would be aimed ‘to prevent Iran’s development of a nuclear weapons capability and counter its destabilizing policies’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Whereas, on April 2, 2012, President Obama stated, ‘All the evidence indicates that the Iranians are trying to develop the capacity to develop nuclear weapons. They might decide that, once they have that capacity that they’d hold off right at the edge in order not to incur more sanctions. But, if they’ve got nuclear weapons-building capacity and they are flouting international resolutions, that creates huge destabilizing effects in the region and will trigger an arms race in the Middle East that is bad for U.S. national security but is also bad for the entire world.’: Now, therefore, be itCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

That Congress--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) reaffirms that the United States Government and the governments of other responsible countries have a vital interest in working together to prevent the Government of Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) warns that time is limited to prevent the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) urges continued and increasing economic and diplomatic pressure on the Islamic Republic of Iran until the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran agrees to and implements--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) the full and sustained suspension of all uranium enrichment-related and reprocessing activities and compliance with United Nations Security Council resolutions;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) complete cooperation with the IAEA on all outstanding questions related to the nuclear activities of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the implementation of the additional protocol to Iran’s Safeguards Agreement with the IAEA; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(C) a permanent agreement that verifiably assures that Iran’s nuclear program is entirely peaceful;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(4) expresses the desire that the P5+1 process successfully and swiftly leads to the objectives identified in paragraph (3), but warns that, as President Obama has said, the window for diplomacy is closing;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(5) expresses support for the universal rights and democratic aspirations of the people of Iran;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(6) strongly supports United States policy to prevent the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(7) rejects any United States policy that would rely on efforts to contain a nuclear weapons-capable Iran; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(8) joins the President in ruling out any policy that would rely on containment as an option in response to the Iranian nuclear threat.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 2. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

Nothing in this resolution shall be construed as an authorization for the use of force or a declaration of war.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Passed the Senate September 22 (legislative day, September 21), 2012.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Attest:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Secretary.

112th CONGRESS

2d Session

S. J. RES. 41

JOINT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the nuclear program of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran NANCY ERICKSON, CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Secretary.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink