HR 491 IHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

113th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

1st SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

H. R. 491CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

To prevent United States businesses from cooperating with repressive governments in transforming the Internet into a tool of censorship and surveillance, to fulfill the responsibility of the United States Government to promote freedom of expression on the Internet, to restore public confidence in the integrity of United States businesses, and for other purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

February 4, 2013CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concernedCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

To prevent United States businesses from cooperating with repressive governments in transforming the Internet into a tool of censorship and surveillance, to fulfill the responsibility of the United States Government to promote freedom of expression on the Internet, to restore public confidence in the integrity of United States businesses, and for other purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

(a) Short Title- This Act may be cited as the ‘Global Online Freedom Act of 2013’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Table of Contents- The table of contents for this Act is as follows:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





Sec. 2. Findings.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





Sec. 3. Definitions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





Sec. 4. Severability.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

TITLE I--PROMOTION OF GLOBAL INTERNET FREEDOM

Sec. 101. Statement of policy.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





Sec. 102. Sense of Congress.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





Sec. 103. Annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





Sec. 104. Annual designation of Internet-restricting countries; report.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





Sec. 105. Report on trade-related issues or disputes due to government censorship or disruption of the Internet.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

TITLE II--CORPORATE TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY TO PROTECT ONLINE FREEDOM

Sec. 201. Disclosure of human rights due diligence.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

TITLE III--EXPORT CONTROLS ON CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT

Sec. 301. Export controls on certain telecommunications equipment.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress makes the following findings:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) The political and economic benefits of the Internet are important to advancing democracy and freedom throughout the world, but the potential benefits of this transformative technology are under attack by authoritarian governments.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) A number of repressive foreign governments block, restrict, otherwise control, and monitor the Internet, effectively transforming the Internet into a tool of censorship and surveillance.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) A number of United States businesses have enabled repressive regimes to compromise the security of Internet users engaged in peaceful discussion of political, social, and religious issues and severely limit their access to information and communication channels by selling these governments or their agents technology or training.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(4) A number of United States businesses have provided repressive governments with information about Internet users who were the company’s clients or were using the companies’ products, that has led to the arrest and imprisonment of the Internet users.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(5) The actions of a number of United States businesses in cooperating with the efforts of repressive governments to transform the Internet into a tool of censorship and surveillance have caused Internet users in the United States and in foreign countries to lose confidence in the integrity of United States businesses.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(6) Information and communication technology companies are to be commended for cooperating with civil society organizations, academics, and investors in founding the Global Network Initiative, in order to provide direction and guidance to the information and communication technology companies and others in protecting the free expression and privacy of Internet users. Human rights due diligence by companies makes a difference.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(7) The United States Government has a responsibility to protect freedom of expression on the Internet, to prevent United States businesses from directly and materially cooperating in human rights abuses perpetrated by repressive foreign governments, and to restore public confidence in the integrity of United States business.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES- The term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Finance of the Senate.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) FOREIGN OFFICIAL- The term ‘foreign official’ means--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) any officer or employee of a foreign government or of any department; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) any person acting in an official capacity for or on behalf of, or acting under color of law with the knowledge of, any such government or such department, agency, state-owned enterprise, or instrumentality.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) INTERNET- The term ‘Internet’ has the meaning given the term in section 231(e)(3) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 231(e)(3)).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(4) INTERNET-RESTRICTING COUNTRY- The term ‘Internet-restricting country’ means a country designated by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 104(a) of this Act.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(5) LEGITIMATE FOREIGN LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSE-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) IN GENERAL- The term ‘legitimate foreign law enforcement purpose’ means for the purpose of enforcement, investigation, or prosecution by a foreign official based on a publicly promulgated law of reasonable specificity that proximately relates to the protection or promotion of the health, safety, or morals of the citizens of the jurisdiction of such official.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION- For purposes of this Act, the control, suppression, or punishment of peaceful expression of political, religious, or ideological opinion or belief shall not be construed to constitute a legitimate foreign law enforcement purpose. Among expression that should be construed to be protected against control, suppression, or punishment when evaluating a foreign government’s claim of a legitimate foreign law enforcement purpose is expression protected by article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(C) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION- No provision under this Act shall be construed to affect a country’s ability to adopt measures designed to combat infringement of intellectual property.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(6) SUBSTANTIAL RESTRICTIONS ON INTERNET FREEDOM- The term ‘substantial restrictions on Internet freedom’ means actions that restrict or punish the free availability of information via the Internet for reasons other than legitimate foreign law enforcement purposes, including--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) deliberately blocking, filtering, or censoring information available via the Internet based on the expression of political, religious, or ideological opinion or belief, including by electronic mail; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) persecuting, prosecuting, or otherwise punishing an individual or group for posting or transmitting peaceful political, religious, or ideological opinion or belief via the Internet, including by electronic mail.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(7) UNITED STATES BUSINESS- The term ‘United States business’ means--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) any corporation, partnership, association, joint-stock company, business trust, unincorporated organization, or sole proprietorship that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(i) has its principal place of business in the United States; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(ii) is organized under the laws of a State of the United States or a territory, possession, or commonwealth of the United States; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) any issuer of a security registered pursuant to section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 4. SEVERABILITY.

If any provision of this Act, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of this Act, and the application of such provision to other persons not similarly situated or to other circumstances, shall not be affected by such invalidation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

TITLE I--PROMOTION OF GLOBAL INTERNET FREEDOMCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 101. STATEMENT OF POLICY.

It shall be the policy of the United States--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) to promote as a fundamental component of United States foreign policy the right of every individual to freedom of opinion and expression, including the right to hold opinions, and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers, without interference;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) to use all appropriate instruments of United States influence, including diplomacy, trade policy, and export controls, to support, promote, and strengthen principles, practices, and values that promote the free flow of information without interference or discrimination, including through the Internet and other electronic media; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) to deter any United States business from cooperating with officials of Internet-restricting countries in effecting the political censorship of online content.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 102. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

It is the sense of the Congress that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) the President should, through bilateral, and where appropriate, multilateral activities, seek to obtain the agreement of other countries to promote the goals and objectives of this Act and to protect Internet freedom; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) to the extent possible in every country in which they operate, United States businesses should work to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) ensure access to the Web sites of the Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Radio Free Asia, Al-Hurra, Radio Sawa, Radio Farda, Radio Marti, TV Marti, or other United States-supported Web sites and online access to United States Government reports such as the annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, the annual Reports on International Religious Freedom, and the annual Trafficking in Human Persons Reports; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) promote the security of Internet users and expand their access to information and communication channels by limiting censorship of protected political and religious speech and information.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 103. ANNUAL COUNTRY REPORTS ON HUMAN RIGHTS PRACTICES.

(a) Report Relating to Economic Assistance- Section 116 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151n) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(g)(1) The report required by subsection (d) shall include an assessment of freedom of expression with respect to electronic information in each foreign country. Such assessment shall consist of the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(A) An assessment of the general extent to which Internet access is available to and used by citizens in that country.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(B) An assessment of the extent to which government authorities in that country attempt to filter, censor, or otherwise block or remove nonviolent expression of political or religious opinion or belief via the Internet, including electronic mail, as well as a description of the means by which such authorities attempt to block or remove protected speech.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(C) An assessment of the extent to which government authorities in that country have persecuted, prosecuted, or otherwise punished an individual or group for the nonviolent expression of political, religious, or ideological opinion or belief via the Internet, including electronic mail.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(D) An assessment of the extent to which government authorities in that country have sought to collect, request, obtain, or disclose the personally identifiable information of a person in connection with that person’s nonviolent expression of political, religious, or ideological opinion or belief, including without limitation communication that would be protected by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(E) An assessment of the extent to which wire communications and electronic communications are illicitly monitored in that country.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(2) In compiling data and making assessments for the purposes of paragraph (1), United States diplomatic mission personnel shall consult with human rights organizations, technology and Internet companies, and other appropriate nongovernmental organizations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(3) In this subsection--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(A) the term ‘electronic communication’ has the meaning given the term in section 2510 of title 18, United States Code;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(B) the term ‘Internet’ has the meaning given the term in section 231(e)(3) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 231(e)(3));CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(C) the term ‘personally identifiable information’ means data in a form that identifies a particular person; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(D) the term ‘wire communication’ has the meaning given the term in section 2510 of title 18, United States Code.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Report Relating to Security Assistance- Section 502B of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 15 U.S.C. 2304) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(j)(1) The report required by subsection (b) shall include an assessment of freedom of expression with respect to electronic information in each foreign country. Such assessment shall consist of the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(A) An assessment of the general extent to which Internet access is available to and used by citizens in that country.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(B) An assessment of the extent to which government authorities in that country attempt to filter, censor, or otherwise block or remove nonviolent expression of political or religious opinion or belief via the Internet, including electronic mail, as well as a description of the means by which such authorities attempt to block or remove protected speech.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(C) An assessment of the extent to which government authorities in that country have persecuted, prosecuted, or otherwise punished an individual or group for the peaceful expression of political, religious, or ideological opinion or belief via the Internet, including electronic mail.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(D) An assessment of the extent to which government authorities in that country have sought to collect, request, obtain, or disclose the personally identifiable information of a person in connection with that person’s communication of ideas, facts, or views where such communication would be protected by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(E) An assessment of the extent to which wire communications and electronic communications are illicitly monitored in that country.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(2) In compiling data and making assessments for the purposes of paragraph (1), United States diplomatic mission personnel shall consult with human rights organizations, technology and Internet companies, and other appropriate nongovernmental organizations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(3) In this subsection--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(A) the term ‘electronic communication’ has the meaning given the term in section 2510 of title 18, United States Code;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(B) the term ‘Internet’ has the meaning given the term in section 231(e)(3) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 231(e)(3));CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(C) the term ‘personally identifiable information’ means data in a form that identifies a particular person; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(D) the term ‘wire communication’ has the meaning given the term in section 2510 of title 18, United States Code.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 104. ANNUAL DESIGNATION OF INTERNET-RESTRICTING COUNTRIES; REPORT.

(a) Designation-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) IN GENERAL- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of State shall designate Internet-restricting countries for purposes of this Act.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) STANDARD- A foreign country shall be designated as an Internet-restricting country if the Secretary of State, after consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, determines, based on the review of the evidence that the government of the country is directly or indirectly responsible for a systematic pattern of substantial restrictions on Internet freedom during any part of the preceding 1-year period.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Report-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) IN GENERAL- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of State shall transmit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) The name of each foreign country that at the time of the transmission of the report is designated as an Internet-restricting country under subsection (a).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) An identification of each government agency and quasi-government organization responsible for the substantial restrictions on Internet freedom in each foreign country designated as an Internet-restricting country under subsection (a).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(C) A description of efforts by the United States to counter the substantial restrictions on Internet freedom referred to in subparagraph (B), including a description and details of programs funded under any other provision of law with the purpose of promoting Internet freedom.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(D) A description of the evidence used by the Secretary of State to make the determinations under subsection (a)(2).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) FORM- The information required by paragraph (1)(C) may be provided in a classified form if necessary.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY- All unclassified portions of the report shall be made publicly available on the Internet Web site of the Department of State.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 105. REPORT ON TRADE-RELATED ISSUES OR DISPUTES DUE TO GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP OR DISRUPTION OF THE INTERNET.

(a) Report- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the United States Trade Representative, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Commerce, shall transmit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) any trade-related issues or disputes that arise due to government censorship or disruption of the Internet among United States trade partners; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) efforts by the United States Government to address the issues or disputes described in paragraph (1) either bilaterally or multilaterally.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Sense of Congress- It is the sense of Congress that the United States should pursue trade policies that expand the information economy by--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) ensuring the free flow of information across the entire global network;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) promoting stronger international transparency rules; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) ensuring fair and equal treatment of online services regardless of country of origin.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

TITLE II--CORPORATE TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY TO PROTECT ONLINE FREEDOMCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 201. DISCLOSURE OF HUMAN RIGHTS DUE DILIGENCE.

(a) In General- Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) is amended by adding at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(s) Disclosure of Human Rights Due Diligence-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(1) DISCLOSURE- Except as provided in paragraph (3), each Internet communications service company that operates in an Internet-restricting country shall include in the annual report of the company information relating to the company, any subsidiary of the company, and any entity under the control of either of such companies, relating to the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(A) HUMAN RIGHTS DUE DILIGENCE- Company policies applicable to the company’s internal operations that address human rights due diligence through a statement of policy that is consistent with applicable provisions of the Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises issued by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, and whether such policy--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(i) is approved at the most senior level of the company;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(ii) explicitly states the company’s expectations of personnel, business partners, and other parties under the control of the company, products, or services;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(iii) is publicly available and communicated internally and externally to all personnel, business partners, other relevant partners, customers, and users;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(iv) is reflected in operational policies and procedures necessary to embed it throughout the company; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(v) is independently assessed by a third party to demonstrate compliance in practice, which should include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(I) whether the assessment was conducted under the supervision of any third party organization or multi-stakeholder initiative;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(II) a description of the assessment process;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(III) a description of measures taken to ensure the assessor’s independence; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(IV) inclusion of the assessor’s public report.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(B) NON-COMPLIANCE- If the company’s policy does not comply with any of the requirements of clauses (i) through (iv) of subparagraph (A), an explanation of why the company’s policy does not meet each such requirement.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(C) POLICIES PERTAINING TO DISCLOSURE OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION- If the company collects or obtains personally identifiable information, the contents of wire communications or electronic communications in electronic storage, or the contents of wire communications or electronic communications in a remote computing service on the Internet, a summary of any internal policies or procedures of the company that set out how the company will assess and respond to requests by the governments of Internet-restricting countries for disclosure of such personally identifiable information or communications.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(D) RESTRICTIONS ON INTERNET SEARCH ENGINES AND INTERNET CONTENT HOSTING SERVICES- If the company creates, provides, or hosts an Internet search engine or an Internet content hosting service, all steps taken to provide users and customers with clear, prominent, and timely notice when access to specific content has been removed or blocked at the request of an Internet-restricting country.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(2) AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION- The Commission shall make all information reported by an issuer pursuant to this subsection available online to the public.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(3) SAFE HARBOR-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(A) IN GENERAL- An Internet communications service company that operates in an Internet-restricting country shall not be required to include in the annual report of the company information described in paragraph (1) if the company includes in the annual report of the company a certification of the Global Network Initiative or a multi-stakeholder initiative described in subparagraph (B) that the company participates in good standing in the Global Network Initiative or the multi-stakeholder initiative (as the case may be).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(B) MULTI-STAKEHOLDER INITIATIVE- A multi-stakeholder initiative referred to in subparagraph (A) is an initiative that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(i) is composed of civil society organizations, including human rights organizations and Internet communications service companies;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(ii) promotes the rule of law and the adoption of laws, policies, and practices that protect, respect, and fulfill freedom of expression and privacy; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(iii) requires each company participating in the initiative to undergo assessments by an independent third party described in subparagraph (C) of the company’s compliance with the standards described in clause (ii).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(C) INDEPENDENT THIRD PARTY- An independent third party referred to in subparagraph (B)(iii) is an entity accredited by the multi-stakeholder initiative to conduct assessments based on criteria that include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(i) general expertise in legal and human rights standards; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(ii) specific expertise in global business processes relating to information and communication technology, including operations, product development cycles, market segments and industry relationships, information technology privacy, safety, and security standards, data retention systems, and database forensics.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(4) DEFINITIONS- In this subsection:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(A) ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION AND OTHER TITLE 18 DEFINITIONS- The terms ‘electronic communication’, ‘electronic communication service’, ‘electronic storage’, ‘wire communication’, and ‘contents’ have the meanings given such terms in section 2510 of title 18, United States Code.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(B) INTERNET- The term ‘Internet’ has the meaning given the term in section 231(e)(3) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 231(e)(3)).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(C) INTERNET COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE COMPANY- The term ‘Internet communications service company’ means an issuer that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(i) is required to file an annual report with the Commission; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(ii)(I) provides electronic communication services or remote computing services, but does not include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(aa) businesses that provide such services as an ancillary service to the provision of lodging, transportation, or food services; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(bb) activities conducted by a financial institution (as such term is defined in section 5312 of title 31, United States Code) that are financial in nature, even if such activities are conducted using the Internet; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(II) is a domain name registrar, domain name registry, or other domain name registration authority.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(D) INTERNET CONTENT HOSTING SERVICE- The term ‘Internet content hosting service’ means a service that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(i) stores, through electromagnetic or other means, electronic data, such as the content of Web pages, electronic mail, documents, images, audio and video files, online discussion boards, or Web logs; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(ii) makes such data available via the Internet.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(E) INTERNET-RESTRICTING COUNTRY- The term ‘Internet-restricting country’ has the meaning given such term under section 3 of the Global Online Freedom Act of 2013.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(F) INTERNET SEARCH ENGINE- The term ‘Internet search engine’ means a service made available via the Internet that, on the basis of a query consisting of terms, concepts, questions, or other data input by a user, searches information available on the Internet and returns to the user a link to or other means of locating, viewing, or downloading information or data available on the Internet relating to such query.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(G) PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION- The term ‘personally identifiable information’ means data in a form that identifies a particular person.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(H) REMOTE COMPUTING SERVICE- The term ‘remote computing service’ has the meaning given such term under section 2711(2) of title 18, United States Code.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Rulemaking- Not later than the end of the 270-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission shall issue final rules to carry out section 13(s) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as added by subsection (a).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

TITLE III--EXPORT CONTROLS ON CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENTCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 301. EXPORT CONTROLS ON CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT.

(a) In General- Section 6 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405), as continued in effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, is amended by adding at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(t) Certain Telecommunications Equipment-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, and the heads of other appropriate Federal departments and agencies, shall establish and maintain, as part of the list maintained under this section, a list of goods and technology that would serve the primary purpose of assisting, or be specifically configured to assist, a foreign government in acquiring the capability to carry out censorship, surveillance, or any other similar or related activity through means of telecommunications, including the Internet, the prohibition or licensing of which would be effective in barring acquisition or enhancement of such capability.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(2) INTERNET-RESTRICTING COUNTRIES- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary shall prohibit the export of goods or technology on the list established under paragraph (1) to a government end user in any Internet-restricting country.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(3) WAIVER- The President may waive the application of paragraph (2) with respect to export of goods or technology on the list established under paragraph (1) on a case-by-case basis if the President determines and certifies to Congress that it is in the national interests of the United States to do so.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(4) DEFINITIONS- In this subsection--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(A) the term ‘Internet’ has the meaning given the term in section 231(e)(3) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 231(e)(3));CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(B) the term ‘Internet-restricting country’ means a country designated by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 104(a) of the Global Online Freedom Act of 2013;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(C) a ‘government end user’ in a country--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(i) is an end user that is a government of that country, or of a political subdivision of that country, or is an agency or instrumentality of such a government; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(ii) includes a telecommunications or Internet service provider that is wholly or partially owned by a government of that country; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





‘(D) an ‘agency or instrumentality’ of a government is an ‘agency or instrumentality of a foreign state’, as defined in section 1603 of title 28, United States Code.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Regulations-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) IN GENERAL- Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall revise the Export Administration Regulations and any other regulations necessary to carry out the amendment made by subsection (a).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) EXPORT ADMINISTRATION REGULATIONS- In this subsection, the term ‘Export Administration Regulations’ means the Export Administration Regulations as maintained and amended under the authority of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and codified, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, in subchapter C of chapter VII of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(c) Effective Date- Section 6(t) of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as added by subsection (a), shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to the export of goods or technology on the list established under paragraph (1) of such section on or after 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink