The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.R.683 - Military Spouses Equal Treatment Act
To amend titles 10, 32, 37, and 38 of the United States Code, to add a definition of spouse for purposes of military personnel policies and military and veteran benefits that recognizes new State definitions of spouse.

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HR 683 IHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

113th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

1st SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

H. R. 683CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

To amend titles 10, 32, 37, and 38 of the United States Code, to add a definition of spouse for purposes of military personnel policies and military and veteran benefits that recognizes new State definitions of spouse.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

February 14, 2013CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

February 14, 2013CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Mr. SMITH of Washington (for himself, Ms. HANABUSA, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. CASTRO of Texas, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. PETERS of California, Ms. KUSTER, Mr. O’ROURKE, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Ms. SPEIER, Ms. TSONGAS, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. RUSH, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. HECK of Washington, Mr. CONNOLLY, Ms. MOORE, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. MORAN, Ms. CHU, Mr. POCAN, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. HONDA, Mr. FARR, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Ms. GABBARD, Ms. NORTON, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mrs. DAVIS of California, and Mrs. CAPPS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concernedCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

To amend titles 10, 32, 37, and 38 of the United States Code, to add a definition of spouse for purposes of military personnel policies and military and veteran benefits that recognizes new State definitions of spouse.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘Military Spouses Equal Treatment Act’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SPOUSE FOR PURPOSES OF MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICIES AND MILITARY AND VETERAN BENEFITS TO REFLECT NEW STATE DEFINITIONS OF SPOUSE.
(a) Title 10-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(1) DEFINITION- Paragraph (5) of

‘(5) Notwithstanding section 7 of title 1, an individual shall be considered a ‘spouse’ if the marriage of the individual is valid in the State in which the marriage was entered into or, in the case of a marriage entered into outside any State, if the marriage is valid in the place in which the marriage was entered into and the marriage could have been entered into in a State. In this paragraph, the term ‘State’ means the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the territories and possessions.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS- Such section is further amended--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1). by striking ‘In this title--’ and inserting ‘The following rules of construction apply in this title:’;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(B) in paragraph (1)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(i) by inserting ‘The term’ after ‘(1)’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(ii) by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting a period;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(C) in paragraph (2)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(i) by inserting ‘The term’ after ‘(2)’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(ii) by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting a period;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(D) in paragraph (3)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(i) by inserting ‘The phrase’ after ‘(3)’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(ii) by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting a period; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(E) in paragraph (4)--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(i) by inserting ‘The term’ after ‘(4)’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(ii) by striking ‘; and’ and inserting a period.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(b) Title 32- Paragraph (18) of

‘(18) Notwithstanding section 7 of title 1, an individual shall be considered a ‘spouse’ if the marriage of the individual is valid in the State in which the marriage was entered into or, in the case of a marriage entered into outside any State, if the marriage is valid in the place in which the marriage was entered into and the marriage could have been entered into in a State. In this paragraph, the term ‘State’ means the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the territories and possessions.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Title 37-

‘(27) Notwithstanding section 7 of title 1, an individual shall be considered a ‘spouse’ if the marriage of the individual is valid in the State in which the marriage was entered into or, in the case of a marriage entered into outside any State, if the marriage is valid in the place in which the marriage was entered into and the marriage could have been entered into in a State. In this paragraph, the term ‘State’ means the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the territories and possessions.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Title 38-

(1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘of the opposite sex’; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

(2) by striking paragraph (31) and inserting the following new paragraph:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

‘(31) Notwithstanding section 7 of title 1, an individual shall be considered a ‘spouse’ if the marriage of the individual is valid in the State in which the marriage was entered into or, in the case of a marriage entered into outside any State, if the marriage is valid in the place in which the marriage was entered into and the marriage could have been entered into in a State. In this paragraph, the term ‘State’ has the meaning given that term in paragraph (20), except that the term also includes the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email

U.S. Congress - Text of H.R.683 as Introduced in House Military Spouses Equal Treatment Act



