H.R.10 - REINS Act

To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that major rules of the executive branch shall have no force or effect unless a joint re solution of approval is enacted into law. view all titles (6)

All Bill Titles

  • Short: Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2011 as introduced.
  • Official: To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that major rules of the executive branch shall have no force or effect unless a joint re solution of approval is enacted into law. as introduced.
  • Official: To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that major rules of the executive branch shall have no force or effect unless a joint resolution of approval is enacted into law. as introduced.
  • Popular: REINS Act as introduced.
  • Short: Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2011 as reported to house.
  • Short: Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2011 as passed house.

This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.

Bill’s Views

  • Today: 4
  • Past Seven Days: 16
  • All-Time: 14,911
 
Introduced
 
House
Passed
 
Senate
Passes
 
President
Signs
 

 
01/20/11
 
12/07/11
 
 
 
 
 

Sponsor

Representative

Geoff Davis

R-KY

View Co-Sponsors (204)
 

Latest Vote

Result: Passed - December 07, 2011

Roll call number 901 in the House

Question: On Passage: H R 10 To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that major rules of the executive branch shall have no force or effect unless a joint resolution of approval is enacted into law

 

Official Summary

Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2011 - (Sec. 2) States that the purpose of this Act is to increase accountability for and transparency in the federal regulatory process by requiring Congress to approve all new major regulations. (Sec. 3) Revises provisions relating

Official Summary

Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2011 -

(Sec. 2)

States that the purpose of this Act is to increase accountability for and transparency in the federal regulatory process by requiring Congress to approve all new major regulations.

(Sec. 3)

Revises provisions relating to congressional review of agency rulemaking to require a federal agency promulgating a rule to include in its report to Congress and to the Comptroller General (GAO) a classification of the rule as a major or nonmajor rule and an analysis of any jobs added or lost, differentiating between public and private sector jobs, in its cost-benefit analysis of such rule. Requires a joint resolution of approval of major rules to be enacted before such rules may take effect (currently, major rules take effect unless a joint resolution disapproving them is enacted). Provides that if a joint resolution of approval is not enacted by the end of 70 session days or legislative days, as applicable, after the agency proposing the rule submits its report on such rule to Congress, the major rule shall be deemed not to be approved and shall not take effect. Permits a major rule to take effect for one 90-calendar day period without such approval if the President determines it is necessary because of an imminent threat to health or safety or other emergency, for the enforcement of criminal laws, for national security, or to implement an international trade agreement. Sets forth the congressional approval procedure for major rules and the congressional disapproval procedure for nonmajor rules. Requires the introduction of a joint resolution addressing a report classifying a rule as a major rule within three legislative days in the House of Representative and three session days in the Senate. Prohibits any amendments to such a joint resolution at any stage of the legislative process. Provides for expedited consideration of a joint resolution of approval and requires a vote on such resolution in the Senate within 15 session days after it is reported by the committee to which it was referred, or after such committee has been discharged from further consideration of the resolution. Allows a court to review whether an agency has completed the necessary requirements under this Act for a rule to take effect (currently, no judicial review of a determination, finding, action, or omission in the rulemaking process is subject to judicial review). Limits the effect of a joint resolution of approval of a major rule. Prohibits an agency from allowing a major rule to take effect without the congressional review procedures set forth in this Act.

(Sec. 4)

Amends the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to provide that any congressional approval procedure set forth in this Act affecting budget authority, outlays, or receipts shall be assumed to be effective unless it is not approved in accordance with this Act.

...Read the Rest

Organizations Supporting H.R.10

  • Americans For Prosperity
  • Competitive Enterprise Institute
  • American Tradition Partnership
  • Industrial Energy Consumers of America
  • Associated General Contractors of America
  • American Foundry Society
  • ...and 7 more. See all.

Organizations Opposing H.R.10

  • Transport Workers Union of America
  • Reproductive Health Technologies Project
  • Center for Progressive Reform
  • Natural Resources Defense Council
  • Gray Panthers
  • AFL-CIO
  • ...and 10 more. See all.


Latest Letters to Congress

See All Letters (14)
 


Vote on This Bill

60% Users Support Bill

37 in favor / 25 opposed
 

Send Your Rep a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC

Top-Rated Comments