H.R.4402 - National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act of 2012

To require the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to more efficiently develop domestic sources of the minerals and mineral materials of strategic and critical importance to United States economic and national security and manufacturing competitiveness. view all titles (4)

All Bill Titles

  • Official: To require the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to more efficiently develop domestic sources of the minerals and mineral materials of strategic and critical importance to United States economic and national security and manufacturing competitiveness. as introduced.
  • Short: National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act of 2012 as introduced.
  • Short: National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act of 2012 as reported to house.
  • Short: National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act of 2012 as passed house.

This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.

Bill’s Views

  • Today: 2
  • Past Seven Days: 8
  • All-Time: 2,713
 
Introduced
 
House
Passed
 
Senate
Passes
 
President
Signs
 

 
04/19/12
 
07/12/12
 
 
 
 
 

Sponsor

Representative

Mark Amodei

R-NV

View Co-Sponsors (27)
 

Latest Vote

Result: Passed - July 12, 2012

Roll call number 468 in the House

Question: On Passage: H R 4402 National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act

 

Official Summary

National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act of 2012 - Title I: Development of Domestic Sources Of Strategic and Critical Minerals - (Sec. 101) Deems a domestic mine that will provide strategic and critical minerals to be an \"infrastructure project\" as described in Presidential

Official Summary

National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act of 2012 - Title I: Development of Domestic Sources Of Strategic and Critical Minerals -

(Sec. 101)

Deems a domestic mine that will provide strategic and critical minerals to be an \"infrastructure project\" as described in Presidential Order \"Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects\" dated March 22, 2012.

(Sec. 102)

Sets forth the responsibilities of the lead agency (federal, state, local, tribal, or Alaska Native Corporation) with responsibility for issuing a mineral exploration or mine permit with respect to project coordination, agency consultation, project proponents, contractors, and the status and scope of any environmental impact statement. Requires the lead agency to determine that any such action would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) if the procedural and substantive safeguards of the lead agency's permitting process alone, any applicable state permitting process alone, or a combination of the two processes together provide an adequate mechanism to ensure that environmental factors are taken into account. Requires the lead agency's project lead, at a project proponent's request, to enter into an agreement with the project proponent and other cooperating agencies that sets time limits for each part of the permit review process. Applies this Act to a mineral exploration or mine permit for which an application was submitted before enactment of this Act if the applicant so requests in writing. Requires the lead agency to begin implementing this Act with respect to such application within 30 days after receiving such a request. Requires the lead agency, with respect to strategic and critical materials within a federally administered unit of the National Forest System, to:
(1) exempt from federal regulations governing Special Areas all areas of identified mineral resources in Land Use Designations (other than Non-Development Land Use Designations);
(2) apply such exemption to all additional routes and areas that the agency finds necessary to facilitate the construction, operation, maintenance, and restoration of the areas of the identified mineral resources; and
(3) continue to apply such exemptions after approval of the Minerals Plan of Operations for the unit.

(Sec. 103)

Declares the priority of the lead agency is to maximize mineral resource development while mitigating environmental impacts, so that more of the mineral resource can be brought to the market place.

(Sec. 104)

Prescribes the Federal Register notice process for mineral exploration and mining projects. Title II: Judicial Review Of Agency Actions Relating To Exploration And Mine Permits -

(Sec. 202)

Bars a civil action claiming legal wrong caused by an agency action unless it is filed by the end of the 60-day period beginning on the date of the final federal agency action to which it relates.

(Sec. 203)

Requires the court to hear and determine any covered civil action as expeditiously as possible.

(Sec. 204)

Prohibits the court, in a covered civil action, from granting or approving prospective relief unless it finds that such relief is narrowly drawn, extends no further than necessary to correct the violation of a legal requirement, and is the least intrusive means necessary to correct such violation.

(Sec. 205)

Declares inapplicable to such a civil action specified requirements of the Equal Access to Justice Act relating to award of costs and fees to a prevailing plaintiff. Prohibits payment from the federal government for court costs of a party in such a civil action, including attorneys' fees and expenses.

...Read the Rest

Organizations Supporting H.R.4402

  • Northwest Mining Association
  • National Mining Association
  • Colorado Mining Association
  • American Elements
  • Agriculture Retailers Association
  • American Farm Bureau Federation
  • ...and 10 more. See all.

Organizations Opposing H.R.4402

  • Freshwater Future
  • Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve
  • Project Mustangs
  • Natural Resources Defense Council
  • Rock Creek Alliance
  • Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness
  • ...and 3 more. See all.




Vote on This Bill

57% Users Support Bill

4 in favor / 3 opposed
 

Send Your Rep a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC