H.R.915 - FAA Reauthorization Act of 2009

To amend title 49, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for the Federal Aviation Administration for fiscal years 2009 through 2012, to improve aviation safety and capacity, to provide stable funding for the national aviation system, and for other purposes. view all titles (10)

All Bill Titles

  • Official: To amend title 49, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for the Federal Aviation Administration for fiscal years 2009 through 2012, to improve aviation safety and capacity, to provide stable funding for the national aviation system, and for other purposes. as introduced.
  • Short: Federal Aviation Research and Development Reauthorization Act of 2009 as introduced.
  • Short: FAA Reauthorization Act of 2009 as introduced.
  • Official: To amend title 49, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for the Federal Aviation Administration for fiscal years 2010 through 2012, to improve aviation safety and capacity, to provide stable funding for the national aviation system, and for other purposes. as amended by house.
  • Short: FAA Reauthorization Act of 2009 as reported to house.
  • Short: Federal Aviation Research and Development Reauthorization Act of 2009 as reported to house.
  • Short: FAA Reauthorization Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: Airport and Airway Trust Fund Financing Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Short: Federal Aviation Research and Development Reauthorization Act of 2009 as passed house.
  • Official: To amend title 49, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for the Federal Aviation Administration for fiscal years 2010 through 2012, to improve aviation safety and capacity, to provide stable funding for the national aviation system, and for other purposes. as introduced.

This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.

Comments Feed

  • DJJ 02/14/2009 8:27pm

    It’s time to foreclose, pay the “piper” and start over, and be accountable for our poor stewartship. Maybe we can clean it up before our children are left holding the bag.

    The other matter: Read information I found on the below websites. Is thias true? If it is how can we trust Mr. Obama and you guys(SCOTUS, House, Senate, FBI,CIA, etc) with something as massive as this when you and he can’t cleanup simple matters from like simply providing a righteous response for a simple request to confirm Mr. Obama’s natural born US citizenship status. Ratherthan simply put this to rest by sending the information requested, I understand Mr. Obama and others named in lawsuits around the country have hired several powerful law firms requesting dismissal and to seal access to all of Mr. Obama’s records(vault copy of BC, college records, immigration records, medical records, ect.). I bet that costs lots money. Why not spend a few bucks and just provide the information? Would that clear the matter up amnd build trust in everyone.

    Before you say it, let me ask: Since when was “FactCheck.org.” Appointed offical vetting agency for the election process?

    In Texas, I understand the plaintiff’s request for dismissal used was that they have “Official Immunity.”

    This gives me great faith and trust in my President & everyone that did not demand his accountability!

    I understand Pelosi, Howard Dean and the DNC are responsible to make sure these matters are properly perfomed? HAs anyone asked them? I also understand a Phil Berg of the Democratic Party advised Mr. Obaqma he was not elligible way back when he first considered entering the race? Then why are there still lawsuits and hush by the Mainstream media? And the Subpoena from Occidental(see below)?

    Mr. Obama can very simply put this to rest as he did the concerns of Rev. Wright. He didn’t get attorny’s to resolve that matters? Is he hiding something?

    http://www.therightsideoflife.com/

    A new lawsuit is being prepared by a California attorney who already has four cases pending over the issue of President Barack Obama’s eligibility to occupy to Oval Office, and this one will include a demand from state lawmakers who forward state funds to Washington for documentation of his qualifications.

    Orly Taitz told WND today that she’s preparing the complaint but is holding onto it and will file it shortly to give state legislators a chance to join the action as plaintiffs.

    Four already have signed up, including state Rep. Eric Swafford of Tennessee, who agreed to be a plaintiff “for a Writ of Mandamus to obtain original birth certificate, immigration records, passports and other vital records for Barry Soetero aka Barack Hussein Obama.”

    Taitz told WND the case also probably will include members of the military as plaintiffs, since both state lawmakers and military officers are obliged to follow orders from the president of the United States and both have a need to know those orders are legitimate.

    “In the military, those would be unlawful orders, and [following them] would subject the officers to courts-martial,” she said. “In the legislatures, they cannot follow any of his bills or orders … they don’t know who he is.

    “As far as we know he is a foreign national … Why should state legislators send any funds from the state to a foreign national?” she said.

    “While we are working on the complaint, I’m gathering support from different states,” she said.

    Other sites with information:
    http://www.colony14.net/id41.html
    http://drorly.blogspot.com/2009/01/senator-alexanders-office-has-forwarded.html
    www.obamacrimes.com
    www.wethepeoplefoundation.org
    http://www.yourfellowcitizen.com/
    http://www.theobamafile.com/
    http://www.actforamerica.com/
    http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/g3.xml
    http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualifications/1244/

  • cbunce 06/09/2009 9:53am

    Dina Titus (NV-3_ voted with party on this bill. On http://www.opencongress.org/people/voting_history/412318_dina_titus
    is says she was against party.

  • m_h 07/16/2009 6:48pm

    This is the bill UPS lobbied for so that FedEx employees could unionize, thereby sharing the “love” when it comes to high union wages.

  • brewclan 09/16/2009 8:15am

    Fedex stop your you lies! There is nothing in this bill that will make you’r employees unionize! You know that they still would have to vote to go union just not on a national vote but by station.Why is it that fedex is so up set about this? Because they dont want to play on a level field with all other companies they like there loop hole the loop hole that got put in the last bill at last moment.Why don’t try telling the truth for once?


Vote on This Bill

43% Users Support Bill

26 in favor / 34 opposed
 

Send Your Rep a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC

Top-Rated Comments