<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Comments on S.223 Senate Campaign Disclosure Parity Act</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/comments/atom/bill/39888" rel="self"/>
  <updated>2008-08-13T00:25:40Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/comments/39888</id>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by SnowflakeSeven</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/39888" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2008-08-13T00:25:40Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-13:/comment/37833</id>
    <author>
      <name>SnowflakeSeven</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Please help pass this bill. Visit &lt;a href="http://pass223.com/"&gt;Pass223.com&lt;/a&gt;, check where your senators stand and then call them to encourage there support.    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by Gabriela</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/39888" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2008-01-14T14:51:39Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-14:/comment/137</id>
    <author>
      <name>Gabriela</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The public has a right to know who is contributing to senators&#8217; campaigns &#8211; immediately, not four months after a paper report has been filed with the Secretary of the Senate. Unlike House or presidential campaigns, Senate campaigns file reports on paper. This means well-heeled donors can bundle contributions in the final, critical weeks of a campaign &#8211; providing the funds necessary for last minute negative attack ads or push polls &#8211; with absolute anonymity.     </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by skrap</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/39888" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2008-01-20T19:44:05Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-20:/comment/321</id>
    <author>
      <name>skrap</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This is an absolute no-brainer.  Ensign has no suitable reason to hold up this bill.    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by textdog</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/39888" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2008-01-15T11:50:41Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-15:/comment/179</id>
    <author>
      <name>textdog</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
here's a testimony from feingold in march '07:

http://feingold.senate.gov/~feingold/statements/07/03/20070314.htm

what was josh marshall's idea for this? 

also, here's a link to the sunlight video on this bill:
http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/1190
    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
