<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Comments on S.352 Sunshine in the Courtroom Act of 2008</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/comments/atom/bill/40446" rel="self"/>
  <updated>2008-02-27T10:14:17Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/comments/40446</id>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by DizzyMsLizzy</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/40446" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2008-02-27T10:14:17Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-27:/comment/1350</id>
    <author>
      <name>DizzyMsLizzy</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
wait-  does this in any way shape or form impact judge judy ?    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by Sparhawk2k</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/40446" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2008-03-19T15:33:53Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-19:/comment/3476</id>
    <author>
      <name>Sparhawk2k</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This seems like a good idea to me.  As long as they deal with the need for some people to remain anonymous that is...  I especially like the idea of more media attention on these matters so that people might know more about them.  I know I'm woefully ignorant of a lot of what is going on in our courts.  And if the media has pictures and videos to show I do think they'd be more interested.    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by salaud</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/40446" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2008-07-02T22:37:50Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-02:/comment/31872</id>
    <author>
      <name>salaud</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I'm not sure about this.  This doesn't really "provide for media"... it kind sounds like it takes away from.    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
