<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Comments on H.R.1908 Patent Reform Act of 2007</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill?controller=comments%2Fatom&amp;id=42936" rel="self"/>
  <updated>2008-02-11T20:57:57Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/comments/42936</id>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by Sparhawk2k</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/42936" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2008-02-11T20:57:57Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-11:/comment/763</id>
    <author>
      <name>Sparhawk2k</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
How is this one different from  S.1145?  The EFF seems to be in support of that one and they seem to be for individuals and innovation...  Though they also have reservations about it and see it more as just a step in the right direction.    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by twodox</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/42936" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2008-01-15T07:11:46Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-15:/comment/181</id>
    <author>
      <name>twodox</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
While this bill does several useful things, and coordinates our patent policy with that of the rest of the world, as required by treaty, it has a major flaw.

It skews the patent law in favor of the large corporations, and reduces the likelihood and size of infringement actions.  Thus there will be little incentive for a major corporation to pay attention to a patent held by a smaller entity or individual.  This will stifle the inventiveness that has made our country great - and has come primarily from individual inventors and small businesses.    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
