<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Comments on H.R.3521 Public Housing Asset Management Improvement Act of 2007</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/comments/atom/bill/46087" rel="self"/>
  <updated>2008-02-26T13:48:32Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/comments/46087</id>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by Anonymous</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/46087" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2008-02-26T13:48:32Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-26:/comment/1280</id>
    <author>
      <name>Anonymous</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
What would occur if public housing agencies were allowed to be exempt from implementing asset management?  Would it allow them to charge their tenants more money?  Would it remove them from government oversight?      </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by Rowland</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/46087" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2008-01-31T17:17:12Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-31:/comment/569</id>
    <author>
      <name>Rowland</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
H.R.3524.  Didn't we just pass this insuring and relocating public housing?    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
