<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Comments on S.3101 Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/comments/atom/bill/51030" rel="self"/>
  <updated>2008-07-03T22:16:30Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/comments/51030</id>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by Anonymous</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/51030" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2008-07-03T22:16:30Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-03:/comment/32312</id>
    <author>
      <name>Anonymous</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As a practice administrator, I must speak out to the importance of this bill.  I come into daily contact with a multitude of confused and dissatisfied senior patients.  They are being targeted by these Advantage insurance companies, told they have a 5.00 Copay, which then increases to a 15.00 copay, etc. etc....on top of that I spend endless hours trying to track down which Advantage plan they currently have, some claims have been in limbo so long that when I finally get it to the correct insurance I get a "past timely filing" denial.  Our patients praise our doctor regularly, they complain of the dishonest and misleading tactics used by the advantage insurers regularly.....tell me again WHY!!!?? are the doctors and clinics get a pay cut and the crooked and FOR PROFIT medicare Advantage insurers getting even more of a FREE RIDE???       </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by Anonymous</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/51030" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2008-07-09T21:03:52Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-09:/comment/33075</id>
    <author>
      <name>Anonymous</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
you are right on!  these advantage insurers are elderly abusers, plain and simple!!     </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by Anonymous</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/51030" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2008-07-13T18:08:47Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-13:/comment/33858</id>
    <author>
      <name>Anonymous</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Jump to: navigation, search
For the 4 Non Blondes song, see What's Up (song).
For the Boston, Massachusetts street newspaper, see Whats Up Magazine 
What's up? is an informal question meaning, depending on situation and emphasis: "What are you doing?", "How are you?", "What is happening?" or "What gives?" It is sometimes used as an informal, casual greeting in itself. This expression was made popular by the cartoon character Bugs Bunny who used it as early as 1940 as part of his catch phrase "What's up Doc?" (where each word was pronounced distinctly).

Whassup (sometimes spelled Wussup or wassup) is also a commonly used African American Vernacular English term of the same meaning. It was the central theme of an advertising campaign for Anheuser-Busch owned "Budweiser" beer brand in the early 2000s.

The phrase is often shortened to "sup", and this term is commonly used as internet slang.

It also sometimes but very rarely used to mean "nice to meet you"

"What's up?" is now rephrased in many ways, mostly for Internet slang and chatting. A few include:

"sup" 
"wassapening" 
"waz up" 
"waz^" 
"wts up" 
"wts new" 
"waz happenin" 
"WUZZAH!!" 
"wuzzup" 
"whussup" 
"wuzzgoinon" 
"wattup" 
"Zappening" 
"Zup" 

[edit] See also
What's Up, Doc? 
What's Up Fox 

[edit] External links
Look up what's up in
Wiktionary, the free dictionary.A video of a myna bird at Honolulu Zoo imitating human speech, including several instances of "What's up?" 
"What's up" at Urban Dictionary 
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What%27s_up%3F"
Categories: Slang | Greeting words and phrases | Sociolinguistics | Language varieties and stylesViewsArticle Discussion Edit this page History Personal toolsLog in / create account Navigation
Main Page 
Contents 
Featured content 
Current events 
Random article 
Search
    Interaction
About Wikipedia 
Community portal 
Recent changes 
Contact Wikipedia 
Donate to Wikipedia 
Help 
Toolbox
What links here 
Related changes 
Upload file 
Special pages 
Printable version 
Permanent link
Cite this page 

    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by Anonymous</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/51030" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2008-06-25T14:20:30Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-25:/comment/28537</id>
    <author>
      <name>Anonymous</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
What is the logic behind not voting for this bill? As it stands doctors still lose money (just not as much), and patients will still see their disgruntled doctoers who are essentially taking a pay cut. It seems like a republicans dream.     </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by Anonymous</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/51030" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2008-06-30T16:53:08Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-30:/comment/30925</id>
    <author>
      <name>Anonymous</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
If this bill passes how can a doctor afford to practice.  Is anyone concern if we get quality healthcare.  Everyone else in the country gets a raise while doctors pay high malpractice insurance and pay cuts.    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by Anonymous</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/51030" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2008-06-25T16:19:08Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-25:/comment/28599</id>
    <author>
      <name>Anonymous</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The issue is that the people out there who are telling these people about the programs and are getting them enrolled won't be able to afford to do their job.  They do not get paid much as it is and they also have to pay all of their own expenses, including gasoline.  The bill makes up for the increased cost of additional services to seniors by cutting the pay to the insurance companies that provide Medicare Part C, which in turn will result in a pay cut to all the people working to reach these seniors.  What good will the improvements do if there aren't people telling them how and where to access them???    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
