2010-03-12T14:22:13Z opencongress.org tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/comments/56482 2010-03-12T14:22:13Z tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-12:/comment/188578 opuspenquin Unbelievable! We don't need more Government. I think that gives the President too much power and control over cyberspace. Whatever happen to just having a really good firewall? With the budget that our Government has, they should be able to afford a really strong firewall. Sounds like we are slowly becoming more like China with all their restrictions over the info on the internet. 2010-03-12T23:09:20Z tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-12:/comment/188617 TheBillGuy faxing them, e-mailing them, TEA party protests, mailing and e-mailing all of my friends, family and e-mail contacts...............what else do we do?????? All these are good ideas. Posters work to. We can also use our voting power at the polls. If our elected representatives aren't working for us, fire them! 2009-12-16T05:51:22Z tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-16:/comment/177456 BenjaWiz Justamick, Network Security should be taking care of by qualified professionals such as those in the field of networking, etc not BIG Government mandates. 2009-12-16T05:47:47Z tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-16:/comment/177450 BenjaWiz People don't buy into this Republican fear tactic this card is always played to get their way just like the PATRIOT ACT 1,2,3 which is in it's current form in violation of our Civil Liberties, Privacy and this bill is no different more government control. 2009-12-16T11:53:44Z tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-16:/comment/177715 justamick Very nice how you completely avoided what I just said... Are you telling me that the Federal Government SHOULD NOT police it's own agencies? Is THAT what you are saying? Did you know, that Information System Security IS handled by qualified professionals with certifications like CCSP? Of course you didn't, because you're speaking like you know what you're talking about when you actually have no clue. Continue to enlighten the rest of us in the lack of knowledge you have in this subject. 2009-12-16T11:50:05Z tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-16:/comment/177710 justamick You absolutely have no clue what you are talking about AND you don't make yourself look any better speaking like you do know what you're talking about. 2009-12-16T12:00:23Z tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-16:/comment/177724 justamick FYI, this encompasses more than Network Security. Information System Security is an all encompassing concept that covers networks, servers an workstations as well as the domain in which information is shared between all of these systems. 2009-12-16T11:58:26Z tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-16:/comment/177721 justamick Dont confuse the Patriot Act with this Cyber Security Act. The Patriot act is a gross violation of civil liberties. All it does is exercise more control over Government IS Policies and Procedures. 2009-12-04T02:39:59Z tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-04:/comment/174302 justamick Wow, that was the most uninformed, ignorant comment, I've perhaps, ever seen. First, EXPLAIN to me how this bill inflates Big Gov't? Second of all, did you even READ the article I posted? No? I suggest you go read it. Let me explain this to you from an Information System (IS) Security perspective, (yes, I actually have expertise in this as I have a MSM of IS Security), the US Government's IS is one of the most vital areas. It is of great strategic importance. What do you think happens if a Chinese hacker is able to bring down our Defense Network?!? Or maybe another network infrastructure that is of vital importance to the Government IS infrastructure? I've said this, I don't know how many times, this Bill DOES NOT govern the public internet! IT GOVERNS US GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY POLICIES! 2009-12-16T12:06:03Z tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-16:/comment/177729 justamick One additional thing, this bill is not suggesting someone besides a qualified Information System Security professional should handle aspects of the GOVERNMENTS IS Security policies. Do you even understand how Government Agencies work? OR are you just another uninformed citizen that bases all of their limited information on hearsay, and baseless information? I find a lot of comments like yours come from people who haven't the slightest idea how a government agency works. 2009-11-03T04:24:16Z tag:opencongress.org,2009-11-03:/comment/159596 justamick There is a MAJOR difference between raising revenue and spending. Choose your words carefully. 2009-08-28T12:10:10Z tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-28:/comment/121943 BLD I wish someone would file a suit to challenge the appointment of these czars and some of these other actions. A good start would have been for the CEO of GM to challenge his dismissal. At some point they have to get so overly confident with their actions that they violate the Constitution and someone will file. My hope is that someday he does something that could rise to the level of an impeachable offense at a time when Repubs/moderates are in power and can get him out. 2009-08-28T09:07:28Z tag:opencongress.org,2009-08-28:/comment/121864 InksLWC Legislation can be introduced in either the Senate or the House. Legislation never bypasses the upper or lower house. If this bill passes the Senate, it would have to be voted on by the House too. 2009-10-09T15:33:44Z tag:opencongress.org,2009-10-09:/comment/139487 adamc Article 1, Section 7: All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills. Bills not related to the raising of revenue (such as this one) may be introduced in either the house or senate. Also from Section 7: Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House... 2009-12-04T02:53:39Z tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-04:/comment/174304 justamick lol, so very lol. Let me explain something to YOU... There will ALWAYS be something going on out there that you will not know ANYTHING about because of two things... Clearance and Need to know. These are the two governing principles that bar the general public from knowing all that goes on behind the political interactions of government leaders. This is not Nazi Germany, this is not the USSR and this is not Communist China. There are REAL threats to this country. There are REAL threats to it's Information System Security infrastructure. It is essential that it is protected from extra-governmental bodies and internal threats alike. 2009-12-20T19:09:28Z tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-20:/comment/178815 ryandsmith At the risk of sounding extreme I believe this bill to be evil and against the constitution of the United States. Congress nor the president have the power to control the flow of information to the American public. This bill is an end around to the US constitution. The US constitution does not allow this kind of bill to become law. 2009-09-08T05:08:03Z tag:opencongress.org,2009-09-08:/comment/123575 racergirlmere Becoming more and more like Russia..... 2009-04-07T18:17:33Z tag:opencongress.org,2009-04-07:/comment/101452 cadaverousmob "For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure–one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."—David Rockefeller 2010-03-23T21:56:57Z tag:opencongress.org,2010-03-23:/comment/190258 Abramsgavin That big bully bastard just start calling David Rockefeller 3BR 2010-07-06T15:01:31Z tag:opencongress.org,2010-07-06:/comment/203484 qweesy Listen hear you globalist Jay Rockefeller, you NWO scab, I know about your great grand daddy John D (sr.)who was a snake oil sells-man and who helped bring in the Federal Reserve CARTEL to destroy this country. Nobody wants your stinking censor the internet bill except the mind-controlled sheep, the only terrorist is you filthy scum-bucket not the fake AL-CIA-DUH you people keep fear mongering about to the American people, you will NEVER have your New World Order plan that you and your family desire. Freedom Will Prevail, you maggot