<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Comments on H.R.2266 Reasonable Prudence in Regulation Act</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill?controller=comments%2Fatom&amp;id=57325" rel="self"/>
  <updated>2009-06-15T12:09:06Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/comments/57325</id>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by NateDaniels</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/57325" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2009-06-15T12:09:06Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-06-15:/comment/109776</id>
    <author>
      <name>NateDaniels</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Hopefully, 2267 will pass.  But in the mean time, we should proceed slowly so their is time for discussion on the matter.  Even republican hardliners must grudgingly admit that the UIGEA never passed on its own merit.  If there is any shred of morality left among those that endorsed the UIGEA on moral grounds, then allowing the free and open discussion on where we head with this should be accepted.    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
