<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Comments on H.R.10 REINS Act</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill?controller=comments%2Fatom&amp;id=67507" rel="self"/>
  <updated>2011-01-23T08:44:28Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/comments/67507</id>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by fakk2</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/67507" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2011-01-23T08:44:28Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-01-23:/comment/225725</id>
    <author>
      <name>fakk2</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I'm just not sure I see the point of this bill    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by javeca</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/67507" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2012-01-26T10:22:03Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2012-01-26:/comment/243979</id>
    <author>
      <name>javeca</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
What this bill does is make sure regulatory agencies such as the EPA, FCC, FDA, BATF,  et al. get permission from Congress to implement any major changes in regulation. In other words providing a little Congressional oversight.    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by soitgoes12</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/67507" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2011-12-07T18:18:17Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-07:/comment/240315</id>
    <author>
      <name>soitgoes12</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I don't see how this is constitutional or why the President would even consider signing it.  More wasting time by the GOP while people are hurting.     </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New comment by soitgoes12</title>
    <link href="/comments/atom/bill/67507" rel="alternate"/>
    <updated>2011-12-07T18:21:30Z</updated>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-12-07:/comment/240316</id>
    <author>
      <name>soitgoes12</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&#8216;(a) No determination, finding, action, or omission under this chapter shall be subject to judicial review.

This is my favorite part by far.  They know it's unconstitutional.     </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
