The Library of Congress  >  THOMAS Home  >  Committee Reports  >  Search Results

49-006

109TH CONGRESS

REPORT

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

2d Session

109-668

--PIC AND POPS CONVENTIONS AND THE LRTAP POPS PROTOCOL IMPLEMENTATION ACT

SEPTEMBER 19, 2006- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed

Mr. GOODLATTE, from the Committee on Agriculture, submitted the following

R E P O R T

[To accompany H.R. 3849]

[Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]

BRIEF EXPLANATION

H.R. 3849 will amend the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act to implement pesticide-related obligations of the United States under the international conventions or protocols known as the PIC Convention, the POPs Convention, and the LRTAP POPs Protocol.

PURPOSE AND NEED

H.R. 3849 provides the necessary legislation to implement the Federal, Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)-related provisions of three international agreements: the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals in International Trade (PIC), and the Protocol on Persistent Organic Pollutants to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP POPs Protocol). U.S. ratification of these three agreements requires targeted amendments to both FIFRA and the Toxics Substances Control Act (TSCA) to ensure that the United States can meet and effectively implement the obligations of the agreements.

The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) aims to protect human health and the environment from chemicals that are of particular concern because they are known to be toxic, bioaccumulative, resistant to natural breakdown, and capable of long-range transport. Each of the twelve chemicals in the Convention has been scientifically linked to adverse human health effects and are already banned, severely restricted, or controlled in the United States. These chemicals are still in use in many places abroad, particularly in developing countries. The Convention prohibits production and use of eight pesticides and industrial chemicals subject to certain exemptions. The Convention also restricts DDT use to public health applications and prohibits new PCB production, while imposing import and export controls on listed chemicals. Parties promote the application of Best Available Techniques (BAT) on key industrial sources and ensure POPs wastes are managed in an environmentally sound manner. The Convention creates a science-based procedure to consider the addition of other chemicals that may be POPs. The Convention entered into force in May of 2004.

The Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) POPs Protocol is a regional agreement negotiated primarily by developed countries. It was finalized prior to the global Stockholm Convention, and the Protocol was used in some ways as a model for the Convention. The structure and core obligations of the Stockholm Convention and LRTAP POPs agreements are very similar in restricting the production, use, or release of certain toxic chemicals. There are three main differences between the two agreements. First, the LRTAP POPs is a regional agreement open only to states in Europe, the former Soviet States, Canada, and the United States. Second, the LRTAP POPs Protocol does not include the same kind of trade measures nor provisions for financial and technical assistance found in the POPs treaty. Finally, the LRTAP POPs Protocol covers four additional chemicals in its scope, each of which is banned or controlled in the United States. The LRTAP POPs Protocol entered into force in October of 2003.

The Rotterdam Convention establishes an information-sharing process that facilitates informed decision-making about whether to import a listed chemical. Both importing and exporting Parties have responsibilities to facilitate information exchange on the risks associated with a listed chemical. The scope of the Convention is limited to banned or severely restricted industrial chemicals and pesticides and to severely hazardous pesticide formulations. Importing Parties make a notification of whether/how they will allow for imports of each listed chemical, and exporting Parties ensure that any exports are not contrary to an importing Party's notification. The Rotterdam Convention includes a technical committee, the Chemical Review Committee, which reviews notifications in accordance with the Convention's criteria, and may recommend to the Parties whether to list additional chemicals. The Convention entered into force in February of 2004.

Over the last 30 years, the United States has taken extensive steps to address the twelve substances covered by the POPs Convention and the sixteen LRTAP substances, as well as the thirty nine substances found on the PIC list. As a result, the United States is generally in compliance with the treaty. There are only a few small gaps to close in terms of U.S. legislative authorities, such as formally prohibiting production of listed pesticides and prohibiting potential future use of unregistered pesticides. The legislation passed by this Committee, outlined in the following review of the bill, H.R. 3849, closes those gaps by amending FIFRA, and a complementary bill has been passed by the House Energy and Commerce Committee (H.R. 4591) amending the Toxic Substance Control Act.

SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS

Section 1--Short title

Sec. 2--Definitions

Amends section 2 of FIFRA by adding the definitions of Conference, Conference Listing Decision, Designated National Authority, Executive Body, Executive Body Decision, HCH, a list of LRTAP POPs Pesticides, LRTAP Pops Protocol, PCB, PIC Convention, POPs Convention, POPs Pesticide, POPs review Committee.

Sec. 3--Amendments to section 17 of FIFRA reflecting new paragraphs (a)(2-14)

Amends section 17 of FIFRA in the following ways (section and paragraph references below refer to FIFRA as amended by this bill)--

Section 17(a)(2)

Amends section 17(a)(2) and provides that a purchaser of a pesticide that is not registered under section 3 or sold under section 6(a)(1) is required to sign a statement prior to export acknowledging that the purchaser understands that such pesticide is not registered for sale in the U.S.

Section 17(c). Importation of pesticides and devices

Amends 17(c) to provide that nothing in this subsection allows for importation of a POPS pesticide or LRTAP POPs pesticide that otherwise is prohibited under subsection (e), the POPs Convention, LRTAP Pops Protocol and PIC Convention subsection.

Section 17(d). Cooperation in international efforts generally

Directs the administrator to participate and cooperate in international efforts to develop and improve pesticide research and regulations.

Section 17(e)(1). In general

Directs the Administrator to participate in `technical cooperation and capacity building activities' designed to support implementation of the POPs Convention, the LRTAP Pops Protocol and the PIC Convention.

Section 17(e)(2). Prohibitions

Prohibits anyone from selling, producing, using, distributing, or disposing in ways contrary to the POPs or LRTAP convention.

Section 17(e)(3). Notice and report after decision that screening criteria are met under the POPs Convention or after risk profile submitted under the LRTAP POPs protocol

Provides that new paragraph (e)(3) applies if POPs Review Committee or Conference decides proposal to list pesticide fulfills screening criteria or shall proceed or if there is a risk profile supporting a proposal under the LRTAP POPs Protocol. Further provides that the administrator may publish notice about the activities of the LRTAP or POPs bodies. Allows for interested persons to comment and lists the required elements of the notice. Directs the Administrator to publish for comments and peer review, a report in consultation with USDA and HHS about the use of that chemical in the U.S.A. and internationally. Such report shall be published not later than 240 days after notice publication.

Section 17(e)(4). Notice and report after decision that global action is warranted under the POPs Convention or that further consideration of the pesticide is warranted under the LRTAP POPs protocol

Provides that this paragraph applies if the POPs Review Committee or the Executive Body determines that global action is warranted or that further consideration is warranted. Authorizes the Administrator to publish the decision in the Federal Register and allow an opportunity to comment. Provides the elements of such notice and requires a comment period of 60 days from the date of publication. Further provides that the Administrator shall issue a report for public comment within 240 days of the publication of notice.

Section 17(e)(5). Notice after recommendation that conference consider listing or after completion of a technical review

Provides that this paragraph applies if the POPs Review Committee recommends consideration of a Conference listing decision (under paragraph 9 of Article 8 of the POPs Convention) or after a Technical Review of a proposal to list a pesticide on an Annex. Provides that the Administrator may publish in the Federal Register a notice of the recommendation or the technical review. Further provides the elements of such notice.

Section 17(e)(6). Provision of information to the public

Requires the Administrator to publish notice once a year in the Federal Register that identifies any pesticide that is the subject of a listing proposal under article 8 of the POPs protocol or Article 14 of the LRTAP POPs Protocol, any pesticide that the Conference or Executive Body has added to Annex A or B of the POPs Convention or Annex I or II of the LRTAP POPs Protocol, and describes any regulatory action the Administrator has taken or is taking related to any pesticide that the Conference or Executive Body added to Annex A or B of the POPs Convention or Annex I or II of the LRTAP POPs Protocol.

Section 17(e)(7). Consideration of information in cancellation of registration or prohibition of production for export or export of pesticides

Provides the factors that the Administrator may consider in the case of a cancellation proceeding under section 6 of FIFRA.

Section 17(e)(8). No effect on other provisions

Provides that nothing in subsection (e) shall authorize the sale of any POPs or LRTAP POPs pesticide that is prohibited under other law.

Section 17(e)(9). Requirements for exports

Requires any person that distributes a pesticide listed in Annex III of the PIC Convention to comply with restrictions or conditions of import by foreign governments, as identified by the Administrator.

Section 17(e)(10). Pre-export notices

Requires an exporter of a pesticide or active ingredient used in producing a pesticide to provide notice to the Administrator in certain cases. Provides the time frame for such notice and permits the Administrator to change the time frames if the Administrator determines that an alternate time frame is appropriate. Requires the Administrator to review the time frames within 18 months of entry into force of the PIC Convention and within 19 months of entry into force of the POPs Convention to determine whether changes need to be made. Describes the content of pre-export notices. Requires an exporter to ensure that a copy of the most recent applicable pre-export notice accompanies each shipment for export and is available for inspection. Further requires exporters to retain pre-export notices and the records used to write the notice for not less than 3 years beginning on the date on which the notice is provided.

Section 17(e)(11). Labeling requirements

Requires any PIC pesticide that requires a pre-export notice to bear a label identifying risks or hazards to health and the environment and shall include safety information. Further requires any PIC pesticide to bear a label with appropriate harmonized system customs codes assigned by the World Customs Organization.

Section 17(e)(12). Notice requirements and exemption

Requires the Administrator to determine whether a pesticide is banned or severely restricted in the U.S. The Administrator shall issue to the Secretariat of the PIC Convention the information specified in Annex I of the PIC Convention and to the public a summary of that information.

Requires the Administrator to provide a copy of the export notice to the importing country once notice of export is received.

Requires the Administrator to give notice to the public on any pesticide listed on Annex III to the PIC Convention and any condition or restriction of an importing state. The notice shall be issued not later than 90 days and shall take effect not later than 180 days after the date of receipt from the Secretariat of the PIC Convention. A noticed restriction/condition shall be considered to be an export condition or restriction.

Authorizes the Administrator to issue an exemption for any pesticide or active ingredient if the administrator determines that the exemption would be consistent with the PIC Convention or POPs Convention.

Section 17(e)(13). Harmonization of POPs Convention and LRTAP POPs Protocol

Provides that when a pesticide is both a POPs pesticide and a LRTAP POPs pesticide, the Administrator should determine the more stringent provision of this subsection and apply such provision. Further provides that this paragraph shall be applied so that the United States is in compliance with its obligations under both the POPs Convention and LRTAP POPs Protocol.

Section 17(e)(14). Harmonization of POPs Convention and PIC Convention

Provides that if the export of a pesticide is restricted under paragraphs (2) through (7) and (9) through (12), all those paragraphs shall apply, but if conflict exists between these provisions, the more stringent provision shall govern. Requires application of paragraphs (2) through (12) to comply with the United States' obligations under the POPs Convention and the PIC Convention.

Section 17(f). Regulations

Authorizes the Administrator to issue necessary regulations, and requires the Secretary of the Treasury to issue regulations for the enforcement of subsection (c) of section 17.

Section 4--Conforming amendments

Section 5--Conforming amendments to FIFRA table of contents

COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

I. HEARINGS

On July 20, 2006, the Committee on Agriculture held a hearing on H.R. 3849, legislation necessary to ratify three international treaties regulating to the use of chemicals to protect human health as well as environmental health. The treaties involved include: the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (PICs), the Protocol on Persistent Organic Pollutants to the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP POPs), and the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade (POPs). H.R. 3849 would amend the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) to put the U.S. in compliance with the treaties.

II. FULL COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

The Committee on Agriculture met, pursuant to notice, with a quorum present, on July 27, 2006, to consider H.R. 3849, legislation to amend the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act to implement pesticide-related obligations of the United States under the international convention or protocols known as the PIC Convention, the POPs Convention, and the LRTAP POPs Protocol.

By unanimous consent, the Subcommittee on Conservation, Credit, Rural Development, and Research was discharged from further consideration and H.R. 3849 was placed before the full Committee and opened for amendment at any point.

Members were recognized and each made a statement in support of the legislation. Counsel was also recognized for a brief explanation of the bill. There being no amendments, Mr. Peterson moved that H.R. 3849 be reported favorably to the House with the recommendation that it pass.

By a voice vote, and in the presence of a quorum, H.R. 3849 was ordered favorably reported to the House.

Chairman Goodlatte then advised Members that pursuant to the rules of the House of Representative that Members have 2 calendar days to file such views with the Committee. No Members came forth with intent to file additional views.

Without objection, staff was given permission to make any necessary clerical, technical or conforming changes to reflect the intent of the Committee.

Chairman Goodlatte thanked all the Members and adjourned the meeting subject to the call of the chair.

REPORTING THE BILL--ROLLCALL VOTES

In compliance with clause 3(b) of rule XIII of the House of Representatives, H.R. 3849 was reported by voice vote with a majority quorum present. There was no request for a recorded vote.

COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT FINDINGS

Pursuant to clause 3(c)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Agriculture's oversight findings and recommendations are reflected in the body of this report.

BUDGET ACT COMPLIANCE (SECTIONS 308, 402, AND 423)

The provisions of clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and section 308(a)(1) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (relating to estimates of new budget authority, new spending authority, new credit authority, or increased or decreased revenues or tax expenditures) are not considered applicable. The estimate and comparison required to be prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office under clause 3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and sections 402 and 423 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 submitted to the Committee prior to the filing of this report are as follows:

U.S. Congress,

Congressional Budget Office,

Washington, DC, August 9, 2006.

Hon. BOB GOODLATTE,
Chairman, Committee on Agriculture,
House of Representatives, Washington, DC.

DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: The Congressional Budget Office has prepared the enclosed cost estimate for H.R. 3849, the PIC and POPs Conventions and the LRTAP POPs Protocol Implementation Act.

If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be pleased to provide them. The CBO staff contact is Susanne S. Mehlman.

Sincerely,

Donald B. Marron,

Acting Director.

Enclosure.

H.R. 3849--PIC and POPs Conventions and the LRTAP POPs Protocol Implementation Act

H.R. 3849 would amend the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act to authorize the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to implement pesticide-related provisions of three international environmental agreements: the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs Convention), the Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution for POPs (POPs Protocol to LRTAP), and the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade (PIC Convention). Those agreements are intended to help protect environmental and human health by eliminating or restricting the use of certain pesticides and to provide a means for participating countries to obtain and disseminate information about chemicals that may be imported and exported.

CBO estimates that implementing H.R. 3849 would cost $5 million over the next five years, assuming appropriation of the necessary amounts. Those funds would support additional personnel for EPA. Although the agency currently regulates many of the pesticides that would be affected by these agreements, this legislation would add to its responsibilities. Specifically, EPA would participate in the international process for determining whether additional pesticides should be prohibited or restricted from use under the agreements. The agency would then oversee the process necessary to implement any prohibition or restriction that the United States chooses to pursue. EPA's duties would include issuing public notices following decisions by the committees established under the agreements, issuing reports on the benefits and risks associated with the use of certain pesticides, and developing and enforcing regulations.

Based on information from EPA, CBO estimates that these activities would cost about $1 million a year, assuming appropriation of the necessary amounts. Enacting H.R. 3849 would not affect direct spending or revenues.

Section 4 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act excludes from the application of that act any legislative provisions that are necessary for the ratification or implementation of international treaty obligations. Because this bill would implement three treaties, it falls within that exclusion. CBO has thus not reviewed the bill for intergovernmental or private-sector mandates.

On August 3, 2006, CBO transmitted a cost estimate for H.R. 4591, the Stockholm and Rotterdam Toxics Treaty Act of 2006, as ordered reported by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on July 21, 2006. H.R. 4591 and H.R. 3849 address the implementation of the same international treaties. H.R. 4591 would require EPA to conduct a cost-benefit analysis when deciding whether to prohibit or ban certain chemicals. H.R. 3849 would not specifically require a cost-benefit analysis by EPA in its review of any pesticides under the international agreements. The CBO cost estimates for these bills reflect these differences.

The CBO staff contacts for this estimate is Susanne S. Mehlman. This estimate was approved by Robert A. Sunshine, Assistant Director for Budget Analysis.

PERFORMANCE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

With respect to the requirement of clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the performance goals and objections of this legislation are to amend the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act to implement pesticide-related obligations of the United States under the international conventions or protocols known as the PIC Convention, the POPs Convention, and the LRTAP POPs Protocol.

CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY STATEMENT

Pursuant to clause 3(d)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee finds the Constitutional authority for this legislation in Article I, clause 8, section 18, that grants Congress the power to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying out the powers vested by Congress in the Constitution of the United States or in any department or officer thereof.

COMMITTEE COST ESTIMATE

Pursuant to clause 3(d)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee report incorporates the cost estimate prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to sections 402 and 423 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974.

ADVISORY COMMITTEE STATEMENT

No advisory committee within the meaning of section 5(b) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act was created by this legislation.

APPLICABILITY TO THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

The Committee finds that the legislation does not relate to the terms and conditions of employment or access to public services or accommodations within the meaning of section 102(b)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act (Public Law 104-1).

FEDERAL MANDATES STATEMENT

The Committee adopted as its own the estimate of Federal mandates prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 423 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Public Law 104-4).

CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED

FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND TABLE OF CONTENTS.

Section 1. Short title and table of contents.
(a) Short title.
(b) Table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definitions.
(a) Active ingredient.
* * * * * * *
(pp) Conference.
(qq) Conference Listing Decision.
(rr) Designated national authority.
(ss) Executive Body.
(tt) Executive Body Decision 1998/2.
(uu) HCH.
(vv) LRTAP POPs pesticide.
(ww) LRTAP POPs protocol.
(xx) PCB.
(yy) PIC Convention.
(zz) POPs Convention.
(aaa) POPs pesticide.
(bbb) POPs Review Committee.
* * * * * * *
Sec. 17. Imports and exports.
(a) Pesticides and devices intended for export.
* * * * * * *
[Struck out->][ (d) Cooperation in international efforts. ][<-Struck out]
[Struck out->][ (e) Regulations. ][<-Struck out]
(d) Cooperation in international efforts generally.
(e) Pops Convention, LRTAP Pops Protocol, and PIC Convention.
(1) In general.
(2) Prohibitions.
(3) Notice and report after decision that screening criteria are met under the POPS Convention or after risk profile submitted under the LRTAP POPS Protocol.
(4) Notice and report after decision that global action is warranted under the POPS Convention or that further consideration of the pesticide is warranted under the LRTAP POPS Protocol.
(5) Notice after recommendation that conference consider listing or after completion of a technical review.
(6) Provision of information to the public.
(7) Consideration of information in cancellation of registration or prohibition of production for export or export of pesticides.
(8) No effect on other provisions.
(9) Requirements for exports.
(10) Pre-export notices.
(11) Labeling requirements.
(12) Notice requirements and exemption.
(13) Harmonization of POPS convention and LRTAP POPS protocol.
(14) Harmonization of POPS convention and PIC convention.
(f) Regulations.
(1) In general.
(2) Importation of pesticides and devices.
* * * * * * *

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

* * * * * * *

SEC. 3. REGISTRATION OF PESTICIDES.

* * * * * * *

SEC. 12. UNLAWFUL ACTS.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 17. [Struck out->][ IMPORTS AND EXPORTS. ][<-Struck out] IMPORTS, EXPORTS, AND INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS.

* * * * * * *

(aa) alternatives to the uses of the pesticide and the efficacy of each alternative; and

(bb) known adverse environmental or human health effects associated with each alternative;

(aa) process changes, control technologies, operating practices, and other pollution prevention techniques that can be used to reduce the emissions of the pesticide; and

(bb) the applicability and effectiveness of each technique describe in item (aa); and

* * * * * * *

ADMINISTRATIVE CORRESPONDENCE

Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT,
Speaker, House of Representatives,
Washington, DC, September 8, 2006.

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: The Administration would like to underscore the importance of the United States becoming a Party to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade, and the Protocol on Persistent Organic Pollutants, negotiated under the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe's Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution.

Passing legislation to implement these Agreements is a top priority for this Administration. President Bush, in a Rose Garden ceremony, stated that the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants address `a global environmental problem' and that `we must work to eliminate, or at least severely restrict, the release of the toxic substances, without delay.' He also emphasized that the substances addressed by the treaty `respect no boundaries and can harm Americans, even when released abroad.'

The Administration expressed full support for H.R. 3849 and H.R. 4591, which were reported out of the House Agriculture and House Energy and Commerce Committees, respectively. These bills provide domestic authority for the United States to join and implement these Agreements. We encourage the House leadership to move forward in September with full floor consideration. As each year passes, the Parties to the Agreements make substantive and procedural decisions that determine their future direction. For this reason, it is critical that the United States has the ability to influence those decisions.

Thank you for your support. You have our firm commitment to work together closely to enable the United States to join these very important international Agreements.

Sincerely,
Condoleezza Rice,
Secretary of State.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Adminstrator, Environment-
al Protection Agency.
Mike Johanns,
Secretary of Agriculture.
-

Hon J. DENNIS HASTERT,
Speaker, House of Representatives,
Washington, DC, July 22, 2005.

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: In a 2001 Rose Garden ceremony, the President called for the United States to join the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, also known as `POPs.' In 2002, the Administration submitted proposed legislation to Congress that would enable us to join and participate in POPs, as well as the Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution on Persistent Organic Pollutants and the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade. We have welcomed the intensive work Congress committed to the legislative process throughout the last session. It is now critical that the legislative process be completed.

In May, the U.S. delegation returned from the first POPs Conference of the Parties in Uruguay. Since we were not a party, we failed to obtain membership on an important committee that will review and make recommendations on additional chemicals for future inclusion on the POPs list. The U.S. role in POPs meetings could be further limited if Congress does not act quickly to adopt necessary implementing legislation, compounding the negative repercussions for U.S. leadership in international chemicals fora.

The Senate and the House have made significant progress developing legislation that provides a solid foundation on which to rapidly conclude the process. We are committed to working closely with you and other Members of Congress to accomplish this shared objective.

Thank you for your support on this effort.

Sincerely,
Stephen L. Johnson
Administrator, Environment-
al Protection Agency.
Condoleezza Rice,
Secretary of State.