My Letter to Congress: H.R.2451 Glass-Steagall Restoration Act of 2011 
Contact Congress
This letter was sent by OpenCongress user
chadlupkes
on
January 15, 2012
in support of
H.R.2451 Glass-Steagall Restoration Act of 2011.
Privacy setting:
PUBLIC
To:
-
Rep. Jim McDermott [D, WA-7] Vote on Passage of H.R.2451: Not Voted Yet -
Sen. Maria Cantwell [D, WA] Vote on Passage of H.R.2451: Not Voted Yet -
Sen. Patty Murray [D, WA] Vote on Passage of H.R.2451: Not Voted Yet
H.R.2451 Glass-Steagall Restoration Act of 2011
I am writing as your constituent in the 7th Congressional district of Washington. I support H.R.2451 - Glass-Steagall Restoration Act of 2011, and am tracking it using OpenCongress.org, the free public resource website for government transparency and accountability.
This letter was a reply from the office of Sen. Maria Cantwell [D, WA] on January 18, 2012.
From the Office of Senator Cantwell
Dear Mr. Lupkes,
Thank you for contacting me about the internet streaming of copyrighted
material. I appreciate hearing from you on this issue.
On May 12, 2011, Senator Leahy (D-VT) introduced S. 968, the Preventing
Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual
Property (PROTECT IP) Act. While I am supportive of the goals of the
bill, I am deeply concerned that the definitions and the means by which
the legislation seeks to accomplish these goals will have unintended
consequences and hurt innovation, job creation, and threaten online
speech and security. On November 17, 2011, I signed a letter along with
Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) objecting to the bill as it is currently
written.
On December 17, 2011, Senator Wyden introduced the "Online Protection
and Enforcement of Digital Trade" (OPEN) Act (S. 2029), of which I am an
original co-sponsor. The bill has been referred to the Senate Finance
Committee, where it is currently awaiting further review. The OPEN Act
is a more effective approach to stopping foreign web sites that are
found to be primarily and willfully used to infringe intellectual
property rights. The OPEN Act builds on the existing legal framework
used by the International Trade Commission for addressing unfair acts in
the importation of articles into the United States, or in their sale for
importation, or sale within the United States after importation.
Our trade laws have yet to catch up to deal with the global digital
economy. The OPEN Act recognizes that the Internet has created new
opportunities for foreign products to reach the U.S. market and that
there is little difference between downloading a pirated movie from a
foreign website and importing a counterfeit movie DVD from a foreign
company. For those foreign web sites that are determined after an
investigation to be primarily and willfully infringing, the
International Trade Commission will issue a "Cease and Desist" order.
The "Cease and Desist" order may also be served on financial
intermediaries that provide services to that foreign web site,
compelling financial payment processors and online advertising providers
to cease doing business with the foreign site in question. This would
cut off financial incentives for this illegal activity and deter these
unfair imports from reaching the U.S. market.
The OPEN Act addresses the same challenges as the PROTECT IP Act, while
protecting freedom of speech, innovation, and security on the Internet.
The challenge of rogue web sites is one that many nation's face. The
United State has always been seen as a leader on Internet issues. Laws
we establish in the United States regarding the Internet are likely to
be used as models around the world. And because the Internet is global
in nature, it is important that we carefully consider how the laws and
policies we adopt in this area may be received and translated by other
countries.
Thank you again for contacting me to share your thoughts on this matter.
You may also be interested in signing up for periodic updates for
Washington State residents. If you are interested in subscribing to this
update, please visit my website at http://cantwell.senate.gov
the future if I can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Maria Cantwell
United States Senator
For future correspondence with my office, please visit my website at
http://cantwell.senate.gov/contact/
This letter was a reply from the office of Sen. Maria Cantwell [D, WA] on January 18, 2012.
From the Office of Senator Cantwell
Dear Mr. Lupkes,
Thank you for contacting me about the internet streaming of copyrighted
material. I appreciate hearing from you on this issue.
On May 12, 2011, Senator Leahy (D-VT) introduced S. 968, the Preventing
Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual
Property (PROTECT IP) Act. While I am supportive of the goals of the
bill, I am deeply concerned that the definitions and the means by which
the legislation seeks to accomplish these goals will have unintended
consequences and hurt innovation, job creation, and threaten online
speech and security. On November 17, 2011, I signed a letter along with
Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) objecting to the bill as it is currently
written.
On December 17, 2011, Senator Wyden introduced the "Online Protection
and Enforcement of Digital Trade" (OPEN) Act (S. 2029), of which I am an
original co-sponsor. The bill has been referred to the Senate Finance
Committee, where it is currently awaiting further review. The OPEN Act
is a more effective approach to stopping foreign web sites that are
found to be primarily and willfully used to infringe intellectual
property rights. The OPEN Act builds on the existing legal framework
used by the International Trade Commission for addressing unfair acts in
the importation of articles into the United States, or in their sale for
importation, or sale within the United States after importation.
Our trade laws have yet to catch up to deal with the global digital
economy. The OPEN Act recognizes that the Internet has created new
opportunities for foreign products to reach the U.S. market and that
there is little difference between downloading a pirated movie from a
foreign website and importing a counterfeit movie DVD from a foreign
company. For those foreign web sites that are determined after an
investigation to be primarily and willfully infringing, the
International Trade Commission will issue a "Cease and Desist" order.
The "Cease and Desist" order may also be served on financial
intermediaries that provide services to that foreign web site,
compelling financial payment processors and online advertising providers
to cease doing business with the foreign site in question. This would
cut off financial incentives for this illegal activity and deter these
unfair imports from reaching the U.S. market.
The OPEN Act addresses the same challenges as the PROTECT IP Act, while
protecting freedom of speech, innovation, and security on the Internet.
The challenge of rogue web sites is one that many nation's face. The
United State has always been seen as a leader on Internet issues. Laws
we establish in the United States regarding the Internet are likely to
be used as models around the world. And because the Internet is global
in nature, it is important that we carefully consider how the laws and
policies we adopt in this area may be received and translated by other
countries.
Thank you again for contacting me to share your thoughts on this matter.
You may also be interested in signing up for periodic updates for
Washington State residents. If you are interested in subscribing to this
update, please visit my website at http://cantwell.senate.gov
the future if I can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Maria Cantwell
United States Senator
For future correspondence with my office, please visit my website at
http://cantwell.senate.gov/contact/
This letter was a reply from the office of Sen. Maria Cantwell [D, WA] on January 20, 2012.
From the Office of Senator Cantwell
Dear Mr. Lupkes,
Thank you for contacting me this week about the internet streaming of
copyrighted material. I appreciate hearing from you on this issue.
I would like to give you an update as to where the proposed legislation
is in the process. The Protect IP Act was scheduled to go to the Senate
floor for a procedural vote on January 23, 2011. Due to the effective
grassroots advocacy and public outcry against the bill, Majority Leader
Harry Reid (D-NV) has pulled the proposed legislation from the floor
calendar.
I appreciate Senator Reid's decision to postpone a vote on the PROTECT
IP Act. America's economy thrives on innovation and freedom of speech.
We can't afford to rush an Internet policy that could trample on our
innovation economy. This week, the American people clearly spoke and
their voices were heard. As we move forward, I'll continue to advocate
for a policy that protects both creative content and online freedom of
speech.
Now, I encourage Congress to consider the OPEN Act, which addresses
illegal piracy and security while keeping the Internet open for free
speech and innovation. The OPEN Act would build on the existing legal
framework for resolving unfair acts in the importation of articles,
including those that infringe a valid and enforceable U.S. patent,
copyright, or trademark. Through the International Trade Commission,
violations of digital trade can be investigated and websites found to be
"willfully" and "primarily" infringing on copyright material can be shut
down. The ITC will create a transparent and adversarial process where
all parties would receive due process and IP rules can be consistently
applied. Neither the Stop Online Piracy Act in the House nor the Protect
IP Act in the Senate allow for similar due process.
Thank you again for contacting me to share your thoughts on this matter.
You may also be interested in signing up for periodic updates for
Washington State residents. If you are interested in subscribing to this
update, please visit my website at http://cantwell.senate.gov
the future if I can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Maria Cantwell
United States Senator
For future correspondence with my office, please visit my website at
http://cantwell.senate.gov/contact/
This letter was a reply from the office of Sen. Patty Murray [D, WA] on February 03, 2012.
Response from Senator Murray
Dear Mr. Lupkes:
Thank you for contacting me regarding H.R.2451, the Glass-Steagall
Restoration Act of 2011, which is currently pending in the United States
House of Representatives. I appreciate knowing your views on this
matter.
In the Senate, this legislation would fall under the jurisdiction of the
Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee. While I am not a member
of that Committee, I want to assure you that I will be following the
progress of this bill and will keep your views in mind if this or
related legislation comes before the full Senate for consideration.
If you would like to know more about my work in the Senate, please feel
free to sign up for my weekly updates at
http://murray.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=GetEmailUpdates
y.senate.gov%2fpublic%2findex.cfm%3fp%3dGetEmailUpdates> . Again, thank
you for taking the time to share your thoughts with me.
Sincerely,
Patty Murray
United States Senator
Note to Congressional staff & elected officials reading this: this letter was sent through Contact-Congress features on OpenCongress.org, a free public resource website, but in the future we seek to compel the U.S. Congress to adopt fully open technology for constituent communications. For more information how your office can better handle public feedback through an open API and open standards, contact us -- even today, there are significantly more efficient and responsive ways for our elected officials to receive email feedback than the status quo of individual webforms. For greater public accountability in government, we must make the process of writing one's members of Congress more accessible and empowering. Looking ahead, we will release more data from Contact-Congress letters and Congressional response rates back into the public commons. This will result in a new open data source on bills & issues people care about, as well as encourage best practices in constituent communications and make it possible to grade members of Congress on their responsiveness & citizen satisfaction.
Share this letter with your friends and followers!
Comment on this letter below