The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate Now
You are writing regarding
8% of users support S.1959
S.1959 has been viewed 28,453 times
S.1959 Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007, 110th Congress
Sponsor: Sen. Susan M. Collins [R, ME]Contact Congress
1.
Choose Your Position
2.
Write Your Letter
3.
Share Your Communication
OpenCongress Message Builder
OpenCongress Message Builder
Use the tools in this column to help craft your letter. Anytime your mouse highlights a section, click on it to add prepared text. You can edit any part of the message at left, and if you like, add your own stories and text to personalize your letter.
Official Bill Info
-
Latest Action: Aug 01, 2007
Introduced in Senate
Clicking this will add the following text:
I know the most recent action for this bill is as follows: "Introduced in Senate" on Aug 01, 2007 -
Committee Assignment:
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Clicking this will add the following text:
This bill has been assigned to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committee.
Bill Statistics on OpenCongress
Clicking this will add the following text:
8% of users on OpenCongress.org, a free, non-partisan resource, support S.1959.
Clicking this will add the following text:
S.1959 has been viewed 28,453 times on OpenCongress.org, a free, non-partisan resource.
Contribution Data
Enter your street address above, and relevant campaign contribution data for your elected officials will appear here in seconds for you to use in your letter.
Most-commented sections of the bill text
Highest Rated User Comments
-
On
January 17, 2008,
by
bruceh
-
The bill summary uses the terms "radicalization" and "violent." Does anyone know how the bill defines those terms? At one time, labor unions, womens' suffrage, ending segregation, and opposing the Vietnam War were all seen as "radical" ideas. If a strike picket line tries to block scabs, is that "violence" as defined by this bill? At one time non-violent sit-ins at segregated lunch counters were accused of violence against the property rights of the owners, is spray-painting "polluter" on the wall of a chemical plant violence as defined by this bill?
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by bruceh, a user on OpenCongress.org, on January 17, 2008, "The bill summary uses the terms "radicalization" and "violent." Does anyone know how the bill defines those terms? At one time, labor unions, womens' suffrage, ending segregation, and opposing the Vietnam War were all seen as "radical" ideas. If a strike picket line tries to block scabs, is that "violence" as defined by this bill? At one time non-violent sit-ins at segregated lunch counters were accused of violence against the property rights of the owners, is spray-painting "polluter" on the wall of a chemical plant violence as defined by this bill? " -
On
January 20, 2008,
by
skrap
-
This bill is unnecessary. Most forms of violent protest are already illegal, as are vandalism, and conspiracy to incite any of the above. Why must we label these things as terrorism?
Not to mention that this bill blames the internet for "providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens." You might as well blame cars for transporting terrorists, or the air for providing oxygen.
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by skrap, a user on OpenCongress.org, on January 20, 2008, "This bill is unnecessary. Most forms of violent protest are already illegal, as are vandalism, and conspiracy to incite any of the above. Why must we label these things as terrorism? Not to mention that this bill blames the internet for "providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens." You might as well blame cars for transporting terrorists, or the air for providing oxygen. " -
On
January 14, 2008,
by
gravelution08
-
If this bill were to become a law, Americans run the risk of losing many of their civil liberties and rights granted by the Bill Of Rights. This must be stopped.
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by gravelution08, a user on OpenCongress.org, on January 14, 2008, "If this bill were to become a law, Americans run the risk of losing many of their civil liberties and rights granted by the Bill Of Rights. This must be stopped."
Highly Rated Blog Articles
-
S.1959: Health Care Fraud Enforcement Act of 2009 - U.S. Congress ...
-
October 27, 2009
by
opencongress.org
-
regarding martial law and putting people into work groups, warrantless searches, end of Habeas Corpus, and the rise of a new character called 'Homegrown Terrorists' as specified in Senate Bill S.1959 which will be anyone against the . ... OpenCongr
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by opencongress.org on October 27, 2009, "regarding martial law and putting people into work groups, warrantless searches, end of Habeas Corpus, and the rise of a new character called 'Homegrown Terrorists' as specified in Senate Bill S.1959 which will be anyone against the . ... OpenCongr" (http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s1959/show) -
Freedom Fighter Radio.net
-
January 03, 2009
by
Freedom Fighter Radio.net
-
COM · S. 1959: Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 · Spychips.com · Stop Black Water · Students for Concealed Carry on Campus · Survive Martial Law. Take Back Washington · Terrorst
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by Freedom Fighter Radio.net on January 03, 2009, "COM · S. 1959: Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 · Spychips.com · Stop Black Water · Students for Concealed Carry on Campus · Survive Martial Law. Take Back Washington · Terrorst" (http://freedomfighterradio.net/?p=3423) -
vindicatum nusquam
-
January 02, 2009
by
vindicatum nusquam
-
The Truth About S 19⦠on Stop S.1959 - call your r⦠Anonymous on Whereâs the oil? Biby Cletus on "What is the brain d⦠deusdiabolus on I donât know how to feel⦠costa rica on I donât know how to feel⦠...
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by vindicatum nusquam on January 02, 2009, "The Truth About S 19⦠on Stop S.1959 - call your r⦠Anonymous on Whereâs the oil? Biby Cletus on "What is the brain d⦠deusdiabolus on I donât know how to feel⦠costa rica on I donât know how to feel⦠..." (http://deusdiabolus.wordpress.com/2009/01/03/933/)
Highly Rated News Articles
-
A Commission that Should Cause Concern
-
February 28, 2008
by
Hawaii Reporter, HI
-
While the pending Senate bill (S.1959) would seem to describe the commission’s mission with considerable care, it also seemingly gives the proposed ...
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by Hawaii Reporter, HI on February 28, 2008, "While the pending Senate bill (S.1959) would seem to describe the commission’s mission with considerable care, it also seemingly gives the proposed ..." (http://www.hawaiireporter.com/story.aspx?eb2933f2-eb4d-4d08-bf1a-f32d5999f9cb) -
A commission that should cause concern By Donald Downs
-
February 26, 2008
by
Washington Times, DC
-
While the pending Senate bill (S.1959) would seem to describe the commission's mission with considerable care, it also seemingly gives the proposed ...
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by Washington Times, DC on February 26, 2008, "While the pending Senate bill (S.1959) would seem to describe the commission's mission with considerable care, it also seemingly gives the proposed ..." (http://washingtontimes.com/article/20080227/COMMENTARY/334570410/1012) -
A Few Important Things for the American Public Radar
-
February 23, 2008
by
OpEdNews, PA
-
by Kathryn Smith Page 1 of 1 page(s) a) Just because the Senate is now sitting on S. 1959 the Violent Radicalization and HOmegrown Terrorism Prevention Act, ...
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by OpEdNews, PA on February 23, 2008, "by Kathryn Smith Page 1 of 1 page(s) a) Just because the Senate is now sitting on S. 1959 the Violent Radicalization and HOmegrown Terrorism Prevention Act, ..." (http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_kathryn__080224_a_few_important_thin.htm)
We are trying to send your message

Contact Congress




