The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate Now
You are writing regarding
29% of users support S.1611
S.1611 has been viewed 8,350 times
S.1611 Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act of 2009, 111th Congress
Sponsor: Judd GreggContact Congress
1.
Choose Your Position
2.
Write Your Letter
3.
Share Your Communication
OpenCongress Message Builder
OpenCongress Message Builder
Use the tools in this column to help craft your letter. Anytime your mouse highlights a section, click on it to add prepared text. You can edit any part of the message at left, and if you like, add your own stories and text to personalize your letter.
Official Bill Info
-
Latest Action: Aug 06, 2009
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Clicking this will add the following text:
I know the most recent action for this bill is as follows: "Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions." on Aug 06, 2009 -
Committee Assignment:
Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Clicking this will add the following text:
This bill has been assigned to the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions committee.
Bill Statistics on OpenCongress
Clicking this will add the following text:
29% of users on OpenCongress.org, a free, non-partisan resource, support S.1611.
Clicking this will add the following text:
S.1611 has been viewed 8,350 times on OpenCongress.org, a free, non-partisan resource.
Contribution Data
Enter your street address above, and relevant campaign contribution data for your elected officials will appear here in seconds for you to use in your letter.
Most-commented sections of the bill text
-
(c) Compliance With Requirements- If the Authority determines, acting pursuant to its authority under subsection (a), that a State substantially provides rights and responsibilities described in subsection (b), then this Act shall not preempt State law.
(1 comments,
Link
)
Clicking this will add the following text:
specifically, this section of the legislation: "(c) Compliance With Requirements- If the Authority determines, acting pursuant to its authority under subsection (a), that a State substantially provides rights and responsibilities described in subsection (b), then this Act shall not preempt State law.", -
(C) the laws or ordinances of any State or political subdivision of a State that provide for the rights and responsibilities described in section 4(b), solely because such laws or ordinances provide that a contract or memorandum of understanding between a public safety employer and a labor organization must be presented to a legislative body as part of the process for approving such contract or memorandum of understanding.
(1 comments,
Link
)
Clicking this will add the following text:
specifically, this section of the legislation: "(C) the laws or ordinances of any State or political subdivision of a State that provide for the rights and responsibilities described in section 4(b), solely because such laws or ordinances provide that a contract or memorandum of understanding between a public safety employer and a labor organization must be presented to a legislative body as part of the process for approving such contract or memorandum of understanding.", -
(2) CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL OPINIONS- In making the determination described in paragraph (1), the Authority shall consider the opinions of affected employers and labor organizations. In the case where the Authority is notified by an affected employer and labor organization that both parties agree that the law applicable to such employer and labor organization substantially provides for the rights and responsibilities described in subsection (b), the Authority shall give such agreement weight to the maximum extent practicable in making the Authority’s determination under this subsection.
(1 comments,
Link
)
Clicking this will add the following text:
specifically, this section of the legislation: "(2) CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL OPINIONS- In making the determination described in paragraph (1), the Authority shall consider the opinions of affected employers and labor organizations. In the case where the Authority is notified by an affected employer and labor organization that both parties agree that the law applicable to such employer and labor organization substantially provides for the rights and responsibilities described in subsection (b), the Authority shall give such agreement weight to the maximum extent practicable in making the Authority’s determination under this subsection.", -
(2) PARTIAL FAILURE- If the Authority makes a determination that a State does not substantially provide for the rights and responsibilities described in subsection (b) solely because the State law substantially provides for such rights and responsibilities for certain categories of public safety officers covered by the Act but not others, the Authority shall identify those categories of public safety officers that shall be subject to the regulations and procedures described in section 5, pursuant to section 8(b)(3) and beginning on the appropriate date described in paragraph (1), and those categories of public safety officers that shall remain subject to State law.
(1 comments,
Link
)
Clicking this will add the following text:
specifically, this section of the legislation: "(2) PARTIAL FAILURE- If the Authority makes a determination that a State does not substantially provide for the rights and responsibilities described in subsection (b) solely because the State law substantially provides for such rights and responsibilities for certain categories of public safety officers covered by the Act but not others, the Authority shall identify those categories of public safety officers that shall be subject to the regulations and procedures described in section 5, pursuant to section 8(b)(3) and beginning on the appropriate date described in paragraph (1), and those categories of public safety officers that shall remain subject to State law.", -
(1) ACTIONS OF STATES- Nothing in this Act or the regulations promulgated under this Act shall be construed to require a State to rescind or preempt the laws or ordinances of any of the State’s political subdivisions if such laws provide rights and responsibilities for public safety officers that are comparable to or greater than the rights and responsibilities described in section 4(b).
(1 comments,
Link
)
Clicking this will add the following text:
specifically, this section of the legislation: "(1) ACTIONS OF STATES- Nothing in this Act or the regulations promulgated under this Act shall be construed to require a State to rescind or preempt the laws or ordinances of any of the State’s political subdivisions if such laws provide rights and responsibilities for public safety officers that are comparable to or greater than the rights and responsibilities described in section 4(b).",
Highest Rated User Comments
Highly Rated Blog Articles
-
Union Control of Public Safety Employees Could Ruin Your Community ...
-
January 01, 2011
by
I am a Citizen Blog
-
(NOTE: On April 12, Mr. Reid reintroduced as S.3194 the Police/Fire Monopoly-Bargaining Bill, which was already pending in the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee as S.1611. Harry Reid and his cohorts cynically ...
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by I am a Citizen Blog on January 01, 2011, "(NOTE: On April 12, Mr. Reid reintroduced as S.3194 the Police/Fire Monopoly-Bargaining Bill, which was already pending in the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee as S.1611. Harry Reid and his cohorts cynically ..." (http://iamacitizen.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/union-control-of-public-safety-employees-could-ruin-your-community/) -
Washington Watch: Legislative Update | Baltimore County FOP Lodge #4
-
December 16, 2010
by
Baltimore County FOP Lodge #4
-
We currently have twenty-five (25) cosponsors on S. 1611. Please note that this total differs slightly from THOMAS, as we are not including in our count Senators Edward M. Kennedy (D-MA), who died last year, or Senator Mel Martinez ...
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by Baltimore County FOP Lodge #4 on December 16, 2010, "We currently have twenty-five (25) cosponsors on S. 1611. Please note that this total differs slightly from THOMAS, as we are not including in our count Senators Edward M. Kennedy (D-MA), who died last year, or Senator Mel Martinez ..." (http://foplodge4.org/fopnews/washington-watch-legislative-update-3/) -
The Police / Fire Collective Bargaining bill is a federal power ...
-
December 15, 2010
by
The Alaska Standard
-
Many months ago, these 6 Republicans had joined the Democrats in cosponsoring the 2009 version of the bill which is called the “Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act of 2009” (S.1611). The 2010 version (S.3991) that Harry Reid ...
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by The Alaska Standard on December 15, 2010, "Many months ago, these 6 Republicans had joined the Democrats in cosponsoring the 2009 version of the bill which is called the “Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act of 2009” (S.1611). The 2010 version (S.3991) that Harry Reid ..." (http://www.thealaskastandard.com/content/police-fire-collective-bargaining-bill-federal-power-grab)
Highly Rated News Articles
We are trying to send your message

Contact Congress




