You are writing regarding

S.1030 Freedom from Restrictive Excessive Executive Demands and Onerous Mandates Act of 2011, 112th Congress

Contact Congress

1. Choose Your Position
2. Write Your Letter
3. Share Your Communication

OpenCongress Message Builder

OpenCongress Message Builder

Use the tools in this column to help craft your letter. Anytime your mouse highlights a section, click on it to add prepared text. You can edit any part of the message at left, and if you like, add your own stories and text to personalize your letter.

Official Bill Info

  • Latest Action: Jul 20, 2011 Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 112-220.

    Clicking this will add the following text:

    I know the most recent action for this bill is as follows: "Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 112-220." on Jul 20, 2011
  • Committee Assignment: Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

    Clicking this will add the following text:

    This bill has been assigned to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committee.

Bill Statistics on OpenCongress

  • 50% of users support S.1030

    Clicking this will add the following text:

    50% of users on OpenCongress.org, a free, non-partisan resource, support S.1030.
  • S.1030 has been viewed 3,333 times

    Clicking this will add the following text:

    S.1030 has been viewed 3,333 times on OpenCongress.org, a free, non-partisan resource.

    • Contribution Data

    Enter your street address above, and relevant campaign contribution data for your elected officials will appear here in seconds for you to use in your letter.

    Most-commented sections of the bill text

    Highest Rated User Comments

    Highly Rated Blog Articles

    • H.R. 527 Passes in the House - December 03, 2011 by gbiasi - Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME) is working with her colleagues on a very similar piece of legislation, Bill S. 1030, the Freedom from Excessive Executive Demands and Onerous Mandates Act of 2011 (also known as the ...

      Clicking this will add the following text:

      As noted by gbiasi on December 03, 2011, "Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME) is working with her colleagues on a very similar piece of legislation, Bill S. 1030, the Freedom from Excessive Executive Demands and Onerous Mandates Act of 2011 (also known as the ..." (http://freestoneblogs.com/nari/2011/12/02/h-r-527-passes-in-the-house/)
    • Susan Collins: Occupier at heart | As Maine Goes - December 02, 2011 by Jim Cyr - Senator Snowe has also introduced a number of small business regulatory reform proposals that have been introduced in the Senate, including the FREEDOM Act (S.1030), and the Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act ...

      Clicking this will add the following text:

      As noted by Jim Cyr on December 02, 2011, "Senator Snowe has also introduced a number of small business regulatory reform proposals that have been introduced in the Senate, including the FREEDOM Act (S.1030), and the Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act ..." (http://www.asmainegoes.com/content/susan-collins-occupier-heart)
    • Cost-Benefit and Other Analysis Requirements in the Rulemaking ... - September 22, 2011 by clotworthy - ... regulatory agencies (S. 358); require cost-benefit analysis for certain agencies' rules (H.R. 1840, H.R. 2175, H.R. 2308, and S. 1292); or improve the implementation of the RFA and UMRA (S. 474, S. 1030, H.R. 527, S. 817, ...

      Clicking this will add the following text:

      As noted by clotworthy on September 22, 2011, "... regulatory agencies (S. 358); require cost-benefit analysis for certain agencies' rules (H.R. 1840, H.R. 2175, H.R. 2308, and S. 1292); or improve the implementation of the RFA and UMRA (S. 474, S. 1030, H.R. 527, S. 817, ..." (http://rfflibrary.wordpress.com/2011/09/21/cost-benefit-and-other-analysis-requirements-in-the-rulemaking-process/)

    Highly Rated News Articles

    • The 'Privatization' of Criminal Prosecution and the CFAA - June 21, 2012 by Law.com - FN2 See 18 U.S.C.S. §1030(a)(1)-(7); LVRC Holdings v. Brekka, 581 F.3d 1127, 1131 (9th Cir. 2009). FN3 18 U.S.C. §§1030(c)(4)(A)(i)(I)-(V). FN4 See 18 U.S.C. §1030(a)(2)(c) and 18 U.S.C. §1030(a)(4). FN5 See, e.g., United States v.

      Clicking this will add the following text:

      As noted by Law.com on June 21, 2012, "FN2 See 18 U.S.C.S. §1030(a)(1)-(7); LVRC Holdings v. Brekka, 581 F.3d 1127, 1131 (9th Cir. 2009). FN3 18 U.S.C. §§1030(c)(4)(A)(i)(I)-(V). FN4 See 18 U.S.C. §1030(a)(2)(c) and 18 U.S.C. §1030(a)(4). FN5 See, e.g., United States v." (http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1339937415222&The_Privatization_of_Criminal_Prosecution_and_the_CFAA=&et=editorial&bu=LTN&cn=LTN_20120621&src=EMC-Email&pt=Law%20Technology%20News&kw=The%20'Privatization'%20of%20Criminal%20Prosecution%20and%20the%20CFAA&slreturn=1)
    • The 'Privatization' of Criminal Prosecution and the CFAA - June 19, 2012 by Law.com - FN2 See 18 U.S.C.S. §1030(a)(1)-(7); LVRC Holdings v. Brekka, 581 F.3d 1127, 1131 (9th Cir. 2009). FN3 18 U.S.C. §§1030(c)(4)(A)(i)(I)-(V). FN4 See 18 U.S.C. §1030(a)(2)(c) and 18 U.S.C. §1030(a)(4). FN5 See, e.g., United States v.

      Clicking this will add the following text:

      As noted by Law.com on June 19, 2012, "FN2 See 18 U.S.C.S. §1030(a)(1)-(7); LVRC Holdings v. Brekka, 581 F.3d 1127, 1131 (9th Cir. 2009). FN3 18 U.S.C. §§1030(c)(4)(A)(i)(I)-(V). FN4 See 18 U.S.C. §1030(a)(2)(c) and 18 U.S.C. §1030(a)(4). FN5 See, e.g., United States v." (http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1339937415222&The_Privatization_of_Criminal_Prosecution_and_the_CFAA)
    • Lawyers' Use of Internet Poses Threat to Fair Trials - June 14, 2012 by Law.com - FN3 Id., 83 Neb. l. Rev. at 716. FN4 Id. FN5 Id., at 692-703. FN6 See Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada, 501 U.S. 1030 (1991); Note, J.E. Pahl, "Court-Ordered Restrictions on Trial—Participant Speech," 57 Duke L.J. 1113 (February 2008).

      Clicking this will add the following text:

      As noted by Law.com on June 14, 2012, "FN3 Id., 83 Neb. l. Rev. at 716. FN4 Id. FN5 Id., at 692-703. FN6 See Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada, 501 U.S. 1030 (1991); Note, J.E. Pahl, "Court-Ordered Restrictions on Trial—Participant Speech," 57 Duke L.J. 1113 (February 2008)." (http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1339383553462&Lawyers_Use_of_Internet_Poses_Threat_to_Fair_Trials)
    Enter your street address at right to find your members of Congress.
    A Letter to Congress from a constituent via OpenCongress.org

    After sending, this letter will be viewable to:

    Characters Remaining:  
    • Click "Send Message" above to complete delivery of this email. (If you don't already have a free "My OpenCongress" account, we'll make one for you now.)
    • Congressional offices require all address information in the form above be completed in order to deliver your email.
    • OpenCongress does not share your address information with any outside parties for any reason.

    OpenCongress is the only not-for-profit website that enables you to write all three of your members of Congress at once.

    OpenCongress is the only website that gives this information back to the public commons, enabling you to find other constituents near you who are tracking the same bills and issues.

    Supporting and Opposing Industries information on this page comes from MAPLight.org, a non-partisan & non-profit organization.

    Campaign contribution data on this page comes from the Center for Responsive Politics, a non-partisan & non-profit organization.

    Other information on this page is uniquely aggregated by OpenCongress, a free & open-source project of the Participatory Politics Foundation, a non-partisan & non-profit organization.

    OpenCongress is a free and open-source project of the Participatory Politics Foundation, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization with a mission to increase civic engagement. The non-profit Sunlight Foundation is the Founding and Primary Supporter of OpenCongress.