The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate Now
You are writing regarding
50% of users support S.165
S.165 has been viewed 2,209 times
S.165 Abortion Non-Discrimination Act of 2011, 112th Congress
Sponsor: Sen. David Vitter [R, LA]Contact Congress
1.
Choose Your Position
2.
Write Your Letter
3.
Share Your Communication
OpenCongress Message Builder
OpenCongress Message Builder
Use the tools in this column to help craft your letter. Anytime your mouse highlights a section, click on it to add prepared text. You can edit any part of the message at left, and if you like, add your own stories and text to personalize your letter.
Official Bill Info
-
Latest Action: Jan 25, 2011
Introduced in Senate
Clicking this will add the following text:
I know the most recent action for this bill is as follows: "Introduced in Senate" on Jan 25, 2011 -
Committee Assignment:
Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Clicking this will add the following text:
This bill has been assigned to the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions committee.
Bill Statistics on OpenCongress
Clicking this will add the following text:
50% of users on OpenCongress.org, a free, non-partisan resource, support S.165.
Clicking this will add the following text:
S.165 has been viewed 2,209 times on OpenCongress.org, a free, non-partisan resource.
Contribution Data
Enter your street address above, and relevant campaign contribution data for your elected officials will appear here in seconds for you to use in your letter.
Supporting Organizations
-
National Committee for a Human Life Ammendment
Clicking this will add the following text:
I know that the organization National Committee for a Human Life Ammendment supports S.165
Most-commented sections of the bill text
-
Section 245 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 238n) is amended--
(1 comments,
Link
)
Clicking this will add the following text:
specifically, this section of the legislation: "Section 245 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 238n) is amended--",
Highest Rated User Comments
Highly Rated Blog Articles
-
BRADWARTHEN.COM » Blog Archive » A thoughtful, informative ...
-
March 28, 2012
by
Brad
-
The sponsors listed on these bills are Senators Bright, Verdin, Fair, Cromer, S. Martin, Reese, Bryant and Grooms. Currently, the bills in the South Carolina legislature are S. 165: Life Beginning at Conception Act, S. 245: Life ...
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by Brad on March 28, 2012, "The sponsors listed on these bills are Senators Bright, Verdin, Fair, Cromer, S. Martin, Reese, Bryant and Grooms. Currently, the bills in the South Carolina legislature are S. 165: Life Beginning at Conception Act, S. 245: Life ..." (/url?q=http://bradwarthen.com/%3Fp%3D15734&sa=U&ei=mdd6T6PvMeKi2wXGv6GnAw&ved=0CEQQmAEwBw&usg=AFQjCNFmJn07-pU0Z67zm6emrmPrvkjfCg) -
BRADWARTHEN.COM » Blog Archive » A thoughtful, informative ...
-
March 27, 2012
by
Brad
-
The sponsors listed on these bills are Senators Bright, Verdin, Fair, Cromer, S. Martin, Reese, Bryant and Grooms. Currently, the bills in the South Carolina legislature are S. 165: Life Beginning at Conception Act, S. 245: Life ...
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by Brad on March 27, 2012, "The sponsors listed on these bills are Senators Bright, Verdin, Fair, Cromer, S. Martin, Reese, Bryant and Grooms. Currently, the bills in the South Carolina legislature are S. 165: Life Beginning at Conception Act, S. 245: Life ..." (/url?q=http://bradwarthen.com/%3Fp%3D15734&sa=U&ei=xxJ5T_zvL6fM2gXL3LC1Bg&ved=0CEAQmAEwBg&usg=AFQjCNHuKCMpkuFqQIfdNAdYg_00APq-Dg) -
BRADWARTHEN.COM » Blog Archive » A thoughtful, informative ...
-
March 27, 2012
by
Brad
-
The sponsors listed on these bills are Senators Bright, Verdin, Fair, Cromer, S. Martin, Reese, Bryant and Grooms. Currently, the bills in the South Carolina legislature are S. 165: Life Beginning at Conception Act, S. 245: Life ...
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by Brad on March 27, 2012, "The sponsors listed on these bills are Senators Bright, Verdin, Fair, Cromer, S. Martin, Reese, Bryant and Grooms. Currently, the bills in the South Carolina legislature are S. 165: Life Beginning at Conception Act, S. 245: Life ..." (/url?q=http://bradwarthen.com/%3Fp%3D15734&sa=U&ei=JMd3T9KeF6bg2AXOzsG1Bg&ved=0CDwQmAEwBQ&usg=AFQjCNH5RIy94l9pYSBp_fRDUpD0G_3AUQ)
Highly Rated News Articles
-
Muni investors need more protection, SEC says
-
July 31, 2012
by
Boston Globe
-
The SEC’s 165-page report said the municipal bond market is ‘‘illiquid and opaque.’’ It recommended that Congress require the issuers of municipal bonds to provide the same information that investors receive in other financial markets.
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by Boston Globe on July 31, 2012, "The SEC’s 165-page report said the municipal bond market is ‘‘illiquid and opaque.’’ It recommended that Congress require the issuers of municipal bonds to provide the same information that investors receive in other financial markets." (http://www.boston.com/business/markets/articles/2012/08/01/municipal_bond_market_investors_need_more_protection_sec_says/) -
S.E.C. Urges Reforms of Municipal Bond Market
-
July 31, 2012
by
New York Times
-
The S.E.C.’s 165- page report said that the municipal bond market is “illiquid and opaque” and recommended that Congress require the issuers of municipal bonds to provide the same information that investors receive in other financial markets.
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by New York Times on July 31, 2012, "The S.E.C.’s 165- page report said that the municipal bond market is “illiquid and opaque” and recommended that Congress require the issuers of municipal bonds to provide the same information that investors receive in other financial markets." (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/01/business/sec-urges-reforms-of-municipal-bond-market.html) -
Regulators call for reform of municipal bond market
-
July 31, 2012
by
Memphis Commercial Appeal
-
The SEC's 165-page report said that the municipal bond market is "illiquid and opaque" and recommended that Congress require the issuers of municipal bonds to provide the same information that investors receive in other financial markets.
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by Memphis Commercial Appeal on July 31, 2012, "The SEC's 165-page report said that the municipal bond market is "illiquid and opaque" and recommended that Congress require the issuers of municipal bonds to provide the same information that investors receive in other financial markets." (http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2012/jul/31/regulators-call-for-reform-of-municipal-bond/?partner=RSS)
We are trying to send your message

Contact Congress




