The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate Now
You are writing regarding
100% of users support S.603
S.603 has been viewed 781 times
S.603 A bill to modify the prohibition on recognition by United States courts of certain rights relating to certain marks, trade names, or commercial names., 112th Congress
Sponsor: Sen. Bill Nelson [D, FL]Contact Congress
1.
Choose Your Position
2.
Write Your Letter
3.
Share Your Communication
OpenCongress Message Builder
OpenCongress Message Builder
Use the tools in this column to help craft your letter. Anytime your mouse highlights a section, click on it to add prepared text. You can edit any part of the message at left, and if you like, add your own stories and text to personalize your letter.
Official Bill Info
-
Latest Action: Mar 16, 2011
Introduced in Senate
Clicking this will add the following text:
I know the most recent action for this bill is as follows: "Introduced in Senate" on Mar 16, 2011 -
Committee Assignment:
Senate Judiciary
Clicking this will add the following text:
This bill has been assigned to the Senate Judiciary committee.
Bill Statistics on OpenCongress
Clicking this will add the following text:
100% of users on OpenCongress.org, a free, non-partisan resource, support S.603.
Clicking this will add the following text:
S.603 has been viewed 781 times on OpenCongress.org, a free, non-partisan resource.
Contribution Data
Enter your street address above, and relevant campaign contribution data for your elected officials will appear here in seconds for you to use in your letter.
Most-commented sections of the bill text
Highest Rated User Comments
Highly Rated Blog Articles
-
S. 603 - GovTrack.us
-
March 20, 2012
by
http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills
-
Mar 16, 2009. S. 603 (111th). A bill to amend rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, relating to representation in court and sanctions for violating such rule, and for other purposes. In GovTrack.us, a database of bills in the U.S. Congress.
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills on March 20, 2012, "Mar 16, 2009. S. 603 (111th). A bill to amend rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, relating to representation in court and sanctions for violating such rule, and for other purposes. In GovTrack.us, a database of bills in the U.S. Congress." (/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/s603&sa=U&ei=m0wXUOv8NZKQ8wSkxIHwCQ&ved=0CDgQmAEwBg&usg=AFQjCNG27H0scPekmvIX4aaIgqvJgfgLQQ) -
S. 603 - GovTrack.us
-
March 20, 2012
by
http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills
-
Mar 16, 2009. S. 603 (111th). A bill to amend rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, relating to representation in court and sanctions for violating such rule, and for other purposes. In GovTrack.us, a database of bills in the U.S. Congress.
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills on March 20, 2012, "Mar 16, 2009. S. 603 (111th). A bill to amend rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, relating to representation in court and sanctions for violating such rule, and for other purposes. In GovTrack.us, a database of bills in the U.S. Congress." (/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/s603&sa=U&ei=gU8TUMKYJsnd0QG5xoCoCQ&ved=0CDQQmAEwBQ&usg=AFQjCNHz6397-rJTdpU00WQrFkJcv1wBYA) -
S. 603 - GovTrack.us
-
March 20, 2012
by
http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills
-
Mar 16, 2009. S. 603 (111th). A bill to amend rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, relating to representation in court and sanctions for violating such rule, and for other purposes. In GovTrack.us, a database of bills in the U.S. Congress.
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by http://www.govtrack.us/users/events.xpd?monitors=misc:activebills on March 20, 2012, "Mar 16, 2009. S. 603 (111th). A bill to amend rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, relating to representation in court and sanctions for violating such rule, and for other purposes. In GovTrack.us, a database of bills in the U.S. Congress." (/url?q=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/s603&sa=U&ei=T-IRUPWvL4Wa9gTLtYAY&ved=0CDUQmAEwBQ&usg=AFQjCNFegeeveC7P2U74HpSXVzsKYUTXIA)
Highly Rated News Articles
-
Credit Suisse (Eur) Form 8.5 (EPT/NON-RI) - Xstrata Plc
-
July 26, 2012
by
Bloomberg
-
Credit Suisse (Eur) - Form 8.5 (EPT/NON-RI) - Xstrata Plc RNS Number : 5890I Credit Suisse Securities (Eur) Ltd 26 July 2012 FORM 8.5 (EPT/NON-RI) PUBLIC OPENING POSITION DISCLOSURE/DEALING DISCLOSURE BY AN EXEMPT PRINCIPAL TRADER ...
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by Bloomberg on July 26, 2012, "Credit Suisse (Eur) - Form 8.5 (EPT/NON-RI) - Xstrata Plc RNS Number : 5890I Credit Suisse Securities (Eur) Ltd 26 July 2012 FORM 8.5 (EPT/NON-RI) PUBLIC OPENING POSITION DISCLOSURE/DEALING DISCLOSURE BY AN EXEMPT PRINCIPAL TRADER ..." (http://www.bloomberg.com/article/2012-07-26/aZkdeggJTsqY.html) -
Mike Johnson Opening Sugarfire Smokehouse
-
July 23, 2012
by
Riverfront Times (blog)
-
Last week, George Mahe of St. Louis Magazine reported what we should have guessed a year ago: Johnson and Carolyn Downs of Cyrano's (603 East Lockwood Avenue; Webster Groves; 314-963-3232) will open a barbecue restaurant called Sugarfire Smokehouse at 9200
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by Riverfront Times (blog) on July 23, 2012, "Last week, George Mahe of St. Louis Magazine reported what we should have guessed a year ago: Johnson and Carolyn Downs of Cyrano's (603 East Lockwood Avenue; Webster Groves; 314-963-3232) will open a barbecue restaurant called Sugarfire Smokehouse at 9200" (http://blogs.riverfronttimes.com/gutcheck/2012/07/mike_johnson_sugarfire_smokehouse_barbecue_olivette.php) -
TAYLOR v. REILLY
-
July 18, 2012
by
Findlaw.com
-
Cf. Wilson v. Layne, 526 U.S. 603, 617 (1999) (finding no clearly established violation of law when the petitioners failed to cite “any cases of controlling authority in their jurisdiction” holding that the practice at issue was unlawful). Taylor ...
Clicking this will add the following text:
As noted by Findlaw.com on July 18, 2012, "Cf. Wilson v. Layne, 526 U.S. 603, 617 (1999) (finding no clearly established violation of law when the petitioners failed to cite “any cases of controlling authority in their jurisdiction” holding that the practice at issue was unlawful). Taylor ..." (http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-dc-circuit/1606250.html)
We are trying to send your message

Contact Congress




