U.S. Congress - Taxation 
Issue: Taxation
Issue's Views
- Today: 20
- Past Seven Days: 104
- All-Time: 39,005
-
S.J.Res.51Introduced Dec 21, 2012 (112th congress) 7 Views
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Intern...
-
S.3695Introduced Dec 19, 2012 (112th congress) 6 Views
A bill to amend section 5000A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an additional religious exemption from the individual health cov...
-
H.R.6658 - Urban Competitiveness ActIntroduced Dec 13, 2012 (112th congress) 5 Views
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a zero capital gains rate for certain new investments in specified areas made during a t...
-
S.3680 - 2013 Making Working Pay Credit ActIntroduced Dec 13, 2012 (112th congress) 8 Views
A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify and extend the making work pay credit.
-
H.R.6659 - Urban Recovery and Growth ActIntroduced Dec 13, 2012 (112th congress) 2 Views
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the recovery zone economic development bonds for certain cities.
-
H.R.6660 - Personal Holding Company Tax Parity and Reinvestment ActIntroduced Dec 13, 2012 (112th congress) 4 Views
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude dividends from controlled foreign corporations from the definition of personal holding c...
-
H.R.6653Introduced Dec 12, 2012 (112th congress) 6 Views
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide standards for determining employment status, and for other purposes.
-
H.R.6647Introduced Dec 11, 2012 (112th congress) 7 Views
To rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as the Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA.
-
S.3667Senate Passed Dec 30, 2012 (112th congress) 7 Views
A bill to rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as the Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA.
-
H.Con.Res.144Introduced Dec 07, 2012 (112th congress) 8 Views
Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax is not in the economic interest of the United States.
-
Share This Issue
More Share via Email
