Rep. Todd Tiahrt
Republican • 4th District, Kansas • 8th Term • Sworn In 1995
Current Term
2009 - 2010
View All
- 15 Sponsored Bills (Ranks 95 of 440) 0 Made Into Law (Ranks 37 of 440)
- 157 Co-Sponsored Bills (Ranks 250 of 440) 2 Made Into Law (Ranks 306 of 440)
- Most often votes with:
- Rep. Duncan Hunter
- Rep. Bobby Bright
- Least often votes with:
- Rep. Vernon Ehlers
- Rep. Barbara Lee
- Votes with party 92%
- Abstains: 3%
Official website: http://tiahrt.house.gov/
Address:
2441 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
2441 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202-225-6216
Fax: 202-225-3489
Fax: 202-225-3489
Person's Views
- Today: 8
- Past Seven Days: 105
- All-Time: 6,782
51.7%
Average Rating
62%
Avg. from State
Write This
Representative
You are writing Rep. Todd Tiahrt [R, KS-4].

U.S. Congress - Rep. Todd Tiahrt, Kansas (R)

Sort By
Comments Feed ?
What's this?
OpenCongress comment boards are an open forum for discussion. Let's build public knowledge about Congress together, so please keep the discussion civil -- no harsh language, subject to our community Comment Policy. Do not post any information here (for example, your name or email) that you do not wish to be public.
Filter Comments to a Rating of at least
What's this?
The Ratings Filter allows you to determine how many user comments to view on pages here on OpenCongress. Setting the filter higher (towards 10) allows you to see only the comments rated "most helpful" by users, while setting the filter lower (towards 0) allows you to see more comments on a page.
QUESTION - your name is not listed as a co-sponser of Rep. Tom Price's bill; Common Sense English Act, H.R. 4464, WHY NOT?????
Why I Am Against The Airbus Plant in Mobile (Brookley BFM)
I was born and raised in Mobile. In fact, I was born at Brookley AFB Hospital. Every since my attendance at the Mertz Elementary school, which is on the approach path of RWY 14 BFM, I have been fascinated and could not wait to learn to fly. Heads up - a flyby - love it! You name an aircraft and I can pretty much tell you what it is, sometimes by sound.
I spent 33 months in Army Aviation and returned to graduate from the University of South Alabama while expanding my knowledge and skills as an aviator (USA had a flight program & team at the time).
Upon graduation from USA, I worked for a local company, involved in aviation, located at Brookley for over twenty years. Unfortuantely, the business is not as stable as you would hope (2nd layoff for me) and along with hundreds of other loyal employees were let go for bottom line, egotistical, self interest thinking. But that is not my point. 'I Love Aviation' even though I have not been working in the industry for several years, I do stay watchful.
My concern with this project is the wholesale givaway of the designated property for this envisioned plant.
Brookley has two major Runways (RWY). RWY 14/32 (SE/NW), and RWY 36/18 (N/S). The U.S. AIR FORCE also had a NE/SW RWY that is currently used as a taxiway and miscellaneous operations at BFM.
In order to get this contract, the Airport Authority in their wisdom deemed the North/South RWY 36/18 as the area over which this planned plant will be built, even though BFM has vast acreage this plant could be located. I suppose its so the Airbus employees working in the newly constructed engineering building can look at the plant across Broad Street.
I would like to question what will happen when RWY 14/32 is shut down for any reason (such as it was for many months for resurfacing/repairs) or if the wind component is too strong for aircraft to utilize? What if there is an emergency where one of the large (or even small) aircraft cannot make it to RWY 14/32, but could have to RWY 18/36). Example: Accident occurred at BFM Thursday, April 24, 2003, of a SOCATA TBM 700B, registration: N705QD, unfortunately fatal. http://ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20030429X00591&key=1
What if the pilot had to extend to attempt the emergency landing on the only other runway; likely involving others on the ground.
By the way, I live on one of the approach paths of RWY 14/32, and I enjoy watching the flight path of various aircraft. RWY 36/18 is also highly utilize not only for normal operations but for training by civil as well as military, Coast Guard especially. It is also usefull to have two active runways where landing and take off is expedited since the runways were designed for just that reason, to not interfere with each other, and to compensate for varying wind components of differing aircraft.
Anyone who flies knows that a runway is your best friend, and if the need arose to reach one in an emergency, well, you cannot have too many. Or is this just a case where we will let the chips (sic) fall where they may, that the income is worth more than the forethought of safety first . . . Bottom Line Management?
You know, high paying jobs may be good for the goose, but most of us will never see any real benefit from any of these jobs, in reality, they will INCREASE cost of living for the area. Fortunately my home is paid for, but I could ill aford what new homes costs these days. My property tax continues to rise.
If you wish to review federal grant money spent on varies airports including BFM use the following link to view these expenditures:
http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/airports/aip/grant_histories/#history
I would be more comfortable to support the plant if they would logically not destroy RWY 18/32.
If the planned course of action continues I support Boeing to win the tanker contract.
Bo Ayer
Mobile AL
vxfetduz http://zhvidxuy.com wbhvbugu appbjnbh <a href="http://tnwmdlmh.com">qbzwaexk</a> [URL=http://kvsijtmg.com]wcbzfjme[/URL]
Todd,
Please be aware of HR 45 Blair Holt...Act. It is designed to eliminate our 'right to bear arms'. Don't let the democrats succeed in this.
Couldn't get an answer from your office when I called. Please step out of your "box" and make human lives and health a priority. Support health care reform NOW!
what are you doing about the h.r 2811 bill,
i hope you oppose the bill, because It is overly simplistic and politically driven. It is poorly thought out and sacrifices good science for political expediency. The negative economic impact for my family and business would be significant. Please oppose HR2811. Thank you for your consideration.
your a good guy i hope you do the right thing my career is a stake. if this becomes active how m i suppose to support my family....