<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<person>
  <biography nil="true"></biography>
  <bioguideid>S000275</bioguideid>
  <birthday type="date">1949-10-22</birthday>
  <congress-office>306 Cannon House Office Building</congress-office>
  <contact-webform>http://www.house.gov/formshadegg/emailtemplate.htm</contact-webform>
  <district>3</district>
  <email nil="true"></email>
  <fax>202-225-3462</fax>
  <firstname>John</firstname>
  <fti-names>'r':4 '-3':6 'az':5 'rep':1 'john':2,7,9 'shadegg':3,8,10</fti-names>
  <gender>M</gender>
  <id type="integer">400368</id>
  <lastname>Shadegg</lastname>
  <metavid-id>John_B._Shadegg</metavid-id>
  <middlename>B.</middlename>
  <name>Rep. John Shadegg [R, AZ-3]</name>
  <nickname nil="true"></nickname>
  <osid>N00006425</osid>
  <page-views-count type="integer">7572</page-views-count>
  <party>Republican</party>
  <phone>202-225-3361</phone>
  <religion>Episcopalian</religion>
  <state>AZ</state>
  <sunlight-nickname nil="true"></sunlight-nickname>
  <title>Rep.</title>
  <unaccented-name>John Shadegg</unaccented-name>
  <url nil="true"></url>
  <user-approval type="float">7.46666666666667</user-approval>
  <watchdog-id nil="true"></watchdog-id>
  <website>http://johnshadegg.house.gov/</website>
  <youtube-id nil="true"></youtube-id>
  <recent-news type="array">
    <recent-news type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>democrat</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 22:09:50 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Sun Nov 08 00:00:00 -0600 2009</date>
      <excerpt>...in hopes that might unravel support for the underlying health care bill among anti-abortion Democrats, but only one did, Rep. John Shadegg, R-Ariz. &amp;quot;If I felt that the (health overhaul) bill could be killed by not advancing the Stupak amendment the</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'r':33 'ban':4 'one':27 'rep':29 'anti':22 'ariz':34 'bill':19,42 'care':18 'felt':37 'hope':9 'hous':1 'john':30 'kill':45 'post':55 'vote':2 'abort':6,23 'amend':51 'among':20 'could':43 'might':11 'under':16 'advanc':48 'health':17,40 'r-ariz':32 'strict':3 'stupak':50 'shadegg':31 'subsidi':7 'support':13 'unravel':12 'democrat':24 'overhaul':41 'anti-abort':21 'washington':54</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6613035</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">true</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>daylife</scraped-from>
      <source>The Washington Post</source>
      <source-url>http://www.washingtonpost.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>House votes strict ban on abortion subsidies</title>
      <url>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/07/AR2009110702764.html?nav=rss_business/industries</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-news>
    <recent-news type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>republican</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 22:09:50 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Sun Nov 08 00:00:00 -0600 2009</date>
      <excerpt>...down the Stupak Amendment, it may take the issue of taxpayer-funding of abortion off the table in the 2010 elections. Update: CSPAN reports the Stupak amendment has passed 240 to 194; according to CSPAN John Shadegg was the only member to vote present..</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'..':66 '193':6 '194':53 '240':4,51 'may':17,26 'pro':14 'yes':10 '2010':41 'fund':33 'issu':29 'john':57 'life':15 'pass':3,50 'tabl':38 'take':27 'vote':9,64 'week':68 'abort':35 'amend':20,24,48 'cspan':44,56 'elect':42 'oppos':18 'updat':1,43 'accord':54 'member':62 'report':45 'stupak':2,19,23,47 'taxpay':32 'gingrey':7 'present':65 'pro-lif':13 'shadegg':58 'standard':69 'republican':16 'taxpayer-fund':31</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6613031</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">true</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>daylife</scraped-from>
      <source>The Weekly Standard</source>
      <source-url>http://www.weeklystandard.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>Update: Stupak Passes 240 to 193; Gingrey Will Vote Yes, But Some Pro-Life Republicans May Oppose Stupak Amendment</title>
      <url>http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/11/update_stupak_passes_240_to_19.asp</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-news>
    <recent-news type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>republican</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 22:09:50 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 00:00:00 -0600 2009</date>
      <excerpt>...East lawn were chanting, &#8220;Kill the bill.&#8221; Republican members including Steve King of Iowa, Michele Bachmann of Minnesota and John Shadegg of Arizona rallied the few hundred Tea Partiers. &#8220;The people who want this bill have contempt for freedom,&#8221;</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'tea':31 'bill':10,38 'east':4 'iowa':17 'john':23 'kill':8 'king':15 'lawn':5 'push':3 'time':43 'want':36 'chant':7 'final':2 'hundr':30 'peopl':34 'ralli':27 'steve':14 'includ':13 'member':12 'michel':18 'arizona':26 'freedom':42 'magazin':44 'partier':32 'shadegg':24 'bachmann':19 'contempt':40 'minnesota':21 'republican':11</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6613036</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">true</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>daylife</scraped-from>
      <source>Time Magazine</source>
      <source-url>http://www.time.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>The Final Push</title>
      <url>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/timeblogs/swampland/~3/YU1SShDQ_kA/</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-news>
    <recent-news type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>congress</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 22:09:50 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 00:00:00 -0600 2009</date>
      <excerpt>...care reform bill on Saturday, one Congressman used an unique approach in opposition of the bill's passage. Holding a baby, Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) spoke for her, saying that she does not want government-run health care.  &quot;This is Maddie. Maddie like</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'r':36 'one':16 'rep':1,32 'run':49 'say':41 'use':18 'ariz':37 'babi':5,31 'bill':13,26 'care':9,11,51 'hold':29 'john':33 'like':56 'necn':57 'want':46 'debat':10 'maddi':6,54,55 'speak':3 'spoke':38 'uniqu':20 'govern':48 'health':8,50 'passag':28 'r-ariz':35 'reform':12 'opposit':23 'shadegg':2,34 'approach':21 'saturday':15 'congressman':17 'government-run':47</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6613032</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">true</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>daylife</scraped-from>
      <source>NECN</source>
      <source-url>http://www.necn.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>Rep. Shadegg speaks for Baby Maddie in health care debate</title>
      <url>http://www.necn.com/Boston/Politics/2009/11/07/Rep-Shadegg-speaks-for-Baby/1257638136.html</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-news>
    <recent-news type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>rep\.</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 22:09:50 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 00:00:00 -0600 2009</date>
      <excerpt>...(CNN) &#8211; In the midst of a heated debate on health care legislation, Rep. John Shadegg, R-Arizona, brought the cute, bald 7-month-old daughter of his Chief of Staff to the floor and gently bounced her in his arms as he expressed his opposition to the D</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'7':33 'd':60 'r':27 'arm':52 'cnn':11,61 'old':36 'rep':1,23 'bald':32 'care':21 'cute':31 'heat':17 'hous':5 'john':24 'quot':2 'want':8 'bounc':48 'chief':40 'choic':10 'debat':18 'floor':6,45 'gentl':47 'maddi':7 'midst':14 'month':35 'staff':42 'health':20 'infant':3 'legisl':22 'arizona':28 'brought':29 'express':55 'opposit':57 'patient':9 'shadegg':25 'daughter':37 'month-old':34 'r-arizona':26</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6613033</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">true</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>daylife</scraped-from>
      <source>CNN</source>
      <source-url>http://www.cnn.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>Rep. quotes infant on House floor: 'Maddie wants patient choice'</title>
      <url>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/cnn_politicalticker/~3/Z2M8vs4iyhg/</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-news>
    <recent-news type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>rep\.</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Fri Nov 06 11:05:12 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Thu Nov 05 00:00:00 -0600 2009</date>
      <excerpt>...if he makes a mistake  practicing medicine, but you cannot sue your insurance company  when it makes a medical decision,&#8221; Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.)  said at the press conference near the steps of the Capitol.  &#8220;That&#8217;s just wrong.  reply to this </excerpt>
      <fti-names>'r':36 'rep':32 'sue':22 'ariz':37 'data':8 'john':33 'make':14,28 'near':43 'said':38 'step':45 'decis':31 'genet':7 'insur':24 'medic':30 'oblig':4 'press':41 'repli':53 'wrong':52 'cannot':21 'confer':42 'mistak':16 'r-ariz':35 'reason':56 'return':6 'capitol':48 'compani':25 'medicin':18 'practic':17 'shadegg':34 'particip':11 'research':2,10</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6597396</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">true</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>daylife</scraped-from>
      <source>Reason</source>
      <source-url>http://www.reason.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>Should Researchers Be Obliged to Return Genetic Data to Research Participants?</title>
      <url>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/reason/HitandRun/~3/caQ_8-qar3U/should-researchers-be-obliged</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-news>
    <recent-news type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>republican</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Wed Nov 04 22:19:19 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Wed Nov 04 00:00:00 -0600 2009</date>
      <excerpt>...delegation have turned to social media such as Twitter to show what they are learning in real time. Republican Rep. John Shadegg started the trend on Oct. 29 when he sent out the following tweet at 2:51 p.m.: &#8220;Pg. 140 of the #healthbill extends immuni</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'2':44 '29':35 '51':45 'pg':47 '140':48 'oct':34 'p.m':46 'rep':27 'bill':7 'east':54 'john':28 'read':5 'real':24 'sent':38 'show':18 'time':25 'turn':10 'deleg':8 'learn':22 'media':13 'start':30 'trend':32 'tweet':2,42 'extend':52 'follow':41 'health':6 'immuni':53 'lawmak':1 'social':12 'tribun':56 'valley':55 'shadegg':29 'twitter':16 'healthbil':51 'republican':26</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6581175</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">true</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>daylife</scraped-from>
      <source>East Valley Tribune</source>
      <source-url>http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>Lawmakers tweet as they read health bill</title>
      <url>http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/146659</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-news>
    <recent-news type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>rep\.</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Sun Nov 01 11:01:55 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Sun Nov 01 00:00:00 -0500 2009</date>
      <excerpt>...Indeed, I am co-sponsor of three pieces of legislation that I know will better address needed reform: &#8226; H.R. 3218, by Rep. John Shadegg, which would allow for small businesses, churches, alumni associations and other small institutions to pool togethe</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'co':16 'gop':1 'h.r':31 'rep':34 '3218':32 'back':3 'busi':42 'care':6 'inde':12 'john':35 'know':25 'need':29 'piec':20 'plan':11 'pool':51 'allow':39 'small':41,48 'three':19 'would':38 'alumni':44 'associ':45 'better':27 'church':43 'health':5 'legisl':22 'reform':7,30 'togeth':52 'address':28 'shadegg':36 'sponsor':17 'institut':49 'co-sponsor':15 'health-car':4 'tennessean':54</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6549663</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">true</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>daylife</scraped-from>
      <source>The Tennessean</source>
      <source-url>http://www.tennessean.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>GOP can back health-care reform, just not this plan</title>
      <url>http://www.tennessean.com/article/20091101/OPINION03/91101005/1001/NEWS</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-news>
    <recent-news type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>republican</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Fri Oct 30 22:08:59 -0500 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Fri Oct 30 00:00:00 -0500 2009</date>
      <excerpt>...Rep. John Shadegg, R-Ariz., says Republicans will unveil a healthcare reform proposal of their own that will deal with the most pressing healthcare issues. The real problems are cost and pre-existing conditions and covering some people in America who do</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'r':13 'gov':5 'pre':42 'rep':9 'say':15 'ariz':14 'cost':39 'deal':28 'issu':34 'john':10 'plan':3 'real':36 'cover':46 'exist':43 'peopl':48 'press':32 'condit':44 'pelosi':2 'propos':22 'r-ariz':12 'reform':21 'takeov':6 'unveil':18 'america':50 'newsmax':53 'problem':37 'shadegg':1,11 'healthcar':8,20,33 'pre-exist':41 'republican':16</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6539276</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">true</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>daylife</scraped-from>
      <source>NewsMax</source>
      <source-url>http://www.newsmax.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>Shadegg: Pelosi Plan is Gov Takeover of Healthcare</title>
      <url>http://www.Newsmax.com/insidecover/gop_healthcare_plan/2009/10/30/279504.html</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-news>
    <recent-news type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>congress</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Fri Oct 30 22:08:59 -0500 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Fri Oct 30 00:00:00 -0500 2009</date>
      <excerpt>...is a breast cancer survivor. Throughout my career in Congress, I have worked on health care legislation in the House of Representatives, and with each bill I have kept her in mind. When the House Democrats&#8217; bill went through the Energy and Commerce Co</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'co':58 'rep':12 'bill':40,51 'care':11,30 'hill':60 'hous':34,49 'john':13 'kept':43 'make':6 'mind':46 'went':52 'work':27 'decis':7 'place':4 'breast':9,17 'cancer':10,18 'career':22 'energi':55 'health':29 'legisl':31 'repres':36 'commerc':57 'shadegg':14 'congress':24 'democrat':50 'survivor':19 'bureaucrat':1 'throughout':20</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6539277</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">true</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>daylife</scraped-from>
      <source>The Hill</source>
      <source-url>http://www.thehill.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>Bureaucrats have no place in making decisions on breast cancer care (Rep. John Shadegg)</title>
      <url>http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/65583-bureaucrats-have-no-place-in-making-decisions-on-breast-cancer-care-rep-john-shadegg</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-news>
  </recent-news>
  <recent-blogs type="array">
    <recent-blog type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>republican</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 22:09:50 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Sun Nov 08 00:00:00 -0600 2009</date>
      <excerpt>...First off, we have AZ's Representative John Shadegg with Baby Maddie. &quot;This is Maddie. Maddie likes America because we have freedom here and Maddie believes in patient choice health care. She has come here to say she doesn't want government to take over</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'az':15 'hr':6 'pam':56 'say':47 'use':2 '3962':7 'babi':21 'care':41 'come':44 'hous':58 'john':18 'like':27 'prop':3 'take':54 'want':51 'blend':59 'choic':39 'debat':5 'doesn':49 'first':11 'maddi':22,25,26,35 'believ':36 'govern':52 'health':40 'repres':17 'america':28 'freedom':32 'patient':38 'shadegg':19 'highlight':10 'republican':1</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6613034</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">false</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>daylife</scraped-from>
      <source>Pam's House Blend</source>
      <source-url>http://www.pamshouseblend.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>Republicans Using Props While Debating HR- 3962 and Other Highlights</title>
      <url>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PamsHouseBlend/~3/Hc47nTAygbQ/republicans-using-props-while-debating-hr-3962</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-blog>
    <recent-blog type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>congress</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 22:09:50 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Sun Nov 08 00:00:00 -0600 2009</date>
      <excerpt>...Gulag Health Care&#8221;  yglesias.thinkprogress.org 22 days ago &#8212; Not content with out of control Hitler analogies , Rep John Shadegg (R-AZ) took to the floor yesterday to demonstrate that he&#8217;s a fool . Lee Fang has the quotes: SHADEGG: You know, it oc</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'r':28 '22':13 'az':29 'oc':51 'ago':15 'day':14 'gop':1 'lee':42 'pro':6 'rep':24 'blip':53 'buck':4 'care':11 'fang':43 'fool':41 'john':25 'know':49 'quot':46 'r-az':27 'took':30 'floor':33 'gulag':9 'lifer':7 'parti':8 'analog':23 'health':10 'hitler':22 'beltway':52 'content':17 'control':21 'pro-lif':5 'shadegg':2,26,47 'demonstr':36 'yesterday':34 'yglesias.thinkprogress.org':12</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6613030</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">false</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>daylife</scraped-from>
      <source>Beltway Blips</source>
      <source-url>http://beltwayblips.dailyradar.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>GOP Shadegg to buck pro-lifers, party</title>
      <url>http://beltwayblips.dailyradar.com/story/gop-shadegg-to-buck-pro-lifers-party/</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-blog>
    <recent-blog type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>democrat</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 22:09:50 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Sun Nov 08 00:00:00 -0600 2009</date>
      <excerpt>...will score a &quot;present&quot; vote on the Stupak amendment as a &quot;no&quot; vote. It is a direct shot at Republican members such as Rep. John Shadegg, who plans to vote present in an attempt to derail the bill. Democrats crafted the the amendment, which prevents fede</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'pro':2 'rep':35 'bill':49 'fede':57 'john':36 'life':3 'plan':39 'shot':29 'vote':8,16,24,41 'amend':20,54 'craft':51 'group':4 'score':6,13 'derail':47 'direct':28 'member':32 'stupak':19 'attempt':45 'present':7,15,42 'prevent':56 'pro-lif':1 'shadegg':37 'democrat':50 'politico':59 'republican':31</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6613038</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">false</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>daylife</scraped-from>
      <source>The Politico</source>
      <source-url>http://www.politico.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>Pro-life group to score present vote as a no</title>
      <url>http://www.politico.com/livepulse/1109/Prolife_group_to_score_present_vote_as_a_no.html</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-blog>
    <recent-blog type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>democrat</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 22:09:50 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 00:00:00 -0600 2009</date>
      <excerpt>...John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) said he plans to buck right-to-life groups and his own party and vote &#8220;present&#8221; on a Democratic amendment that would prevent federal funding for abortions as part of health-care overhaul legislation. Shadegg is doing so in the</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'r':12 'gop':1 'pro':6 'ariz':13 'buck':4,18 'care':47 'fund':39 'john':9 'life':22 'part':43 'plan':16 'said':14 'vote':29 'abort':41 'amend':34 'feder':38 'group':23 'lifer':7 'parti':8,27 'right':20 'would':36 'health':46 'legisl':49 'r-ariz':11 'present':30 'prevent':37 'pro-lif':5 'shadegg':2,10,50 'democrat':33 'overhaul':48 'politico':57 'health-car':45 'right-to-lif':19</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6613037</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">false</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>daylife</scraped-from>
      <source>The Politico</source>
      <source-url>http://www.politico.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>GOP Shadegg to buck pro-lifers, party</title>
      <url>http://www.politico.com/livepulse/1109/GOP_Shadegg_to_buck_prolifers_party.html</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-blog>
    <recent-blog type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>congress</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 22:09:44 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 00:00:00 -0600 2009</date>
      <excerpt>Congressman John Shadegg used someone else&amp;#39;s baby granddaughter as a prop to argue against the public health care option. Maddie, an adorable little girl, was bounced around by the Representative from Arizona as he explained that the ...</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'els':6,17 'use':4,15 'ador':34 'anti':11 'argu':25 'babi':8,19 'care':30 'girl':36 'idea':51 'john':2,13 'prop':23 'bounc':38 'daunt':50 'littl':35 'maddi':32 'around':39 'health':29 'option':31 'public':28 'repres':42 'someon':5,16 'arizona':44 'explain':47 'shadegg':3,14 'congressman':1,12 'granddaught':20</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6613029</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">false</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>google blog</scraped-from>
      <source>Daunting Ideas </source>
      <source-url>http://dauntingideas.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>Congressman John Shadegg Uses Someone Else&amp;#39;s Baby as an Anti ...</title>
      <url>http://dauntingideas.com/content/congressman-john-shadegg-uses-someone-elses-baby-anti-health-care-reform-prop</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-blog>
    <recent-blog type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>rep\.</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 22:09:44 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 00:00:00 -0600 2009</date>
      <excerpt>The Horror: John Shadegg uses baby Maddie as a prop during health-care debate - DOWNLOADS: (133) [image: Download WMV] [image: Download Quicktime] PLAYS: (349) [image: Play WMV] [image: Play Quicktime] This is sickening. Rep. ...</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'133':28 '349':36 'rep':46 'use':16 'wmv':31,39 'babi':17 'care':25 'even':10 'imag':29,32,37,40 'john':14 'news':2,48 'play':35,38,41 'prop':21 'debat':26 'great':4,50 'maddi':18 'truth':8 'deserv':6,52 'health':24 'horror':13 'nation':5,51 'sicken':45 'shadegg':15 'download':27,30,33 'quicktim':34,42 'health-car':23 'americablog':1,47</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6613028</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">false</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>google blog</scraped-from>
      <source>AMERICAblog News| A great nation deserves... </source>
      <source-url>http://www.americablog.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>AMERICAblog News| A great nation deserves the truth: And even more ...</title>
      <url>http://www.americablog.com/2009/11/and-even-more-bank-closings.html</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-blog>
    <recent-blog type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>congress</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 22:09:43 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 00:00:00 -0600 2009</date>
      <excerpt>503 CHOB John Shadegg, AZ 225-3361 1407 LHOB Michael Patrick Flanagan, IL 225-4061 1728 LHOB Charles F. Bass, NH 225-5206 1508 LHOB Steve C. LaTourettee, OH 225-5731 1223 LHOB Marshall &amp;quot;Mark&amp;quot; Sanford, SC 225-3176 ...</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'c':34 'f':26 'az':12 'il':20 'nh':28 'oh':36 'sc':44 '225':13,21,29,37,45 '503':8 '1223':39 '1407':15 '1508':31 '1728':23 'bass':27 'chob':9 'govt':1 'john':10 'lhob':16,24,32,40 'mark':42 '-3176':46 '-3361':14 '-4061':22 '-5206':30 '-5731':38 'charl':25 'steve':33 'altern':6,47 'holist':50 'reform':2 'marshal':41 'michael':17 'patrick':18 'sanford':43 'shadegg':11 'committe':5 'flanagan':19 'oversight':4 'latourette':35 'complementari':7,48</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6613025</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">false</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>google blog</scraped-from>
      <source>Alternative, complementary and holistic... </source>
      <source-url>http://www.mischealthalt.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>Govt Reform and Oversight Committee &#171; Alternative, complementary ...</title>
      <url>http://www.mischealthalt.com/govt-reform-and-oversight-committee</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-blog>
    <recent-blog type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>congress</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 22:09:44 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 00:00:00 -0600 2009</date>
      <excerpt>The tally was 240-194-1, with John Shadegg following through on his &#8220;brilliant&#8221; plan (almost as brilliant as Maddie the Freedom Baby&#8230;) to vote &#8220;present,&#8221; in hopes of deep-sixing the final bill by causing the Stupak amendment not to pass ...</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'-1':16 '240':14 'six':42 '-194':15 'babi':33 'bill':45 'caus':47 'deep':41 'hope':38 'john':18 'pass':53 'plan':25 'reid':9,55 'vote':5,35 'amend':50 'final':44 'maddi':30 'nanci':2 'talli':12 'almost':26 'follow':20 'report':10,56 'stupak':49 'freedom':32 'present':36 'shadegg':19 'deep-six':40 'politico':1 'brilliant':24,28 'healthcar':7</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6613026</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">false</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>google blog</scraped-from>
      <source>The Reid Report </source>
      <source-url>http://blog.reidreport.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>Politico: Nancy has the votes on healthcare : The Reid Report</title>
      <url>http://blog.reidreport.com/2009/11/politico-nancy-has-the-votes-on-healthcare/</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-blog>
    <recent-blog type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>republican</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 22:09:41 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 00:00:00 -0600 2009</date>
      <excerpt>First off, we have AZ&amp;#39;s Representative John Shadegg with Baby Maddie. &amp;quot;This is Maddie. Maddie likes America because we have freedom here and Maddie believes in patient choice health care. She has come here to say she doesn&amp;#39;t want ...</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'az':15 'hr':10 'pam':1,52 'say':47 'use':6 'babi':21 'care':41 'come':44 'hous':3,54 'john':18 'like':27 'page':57 'prop':7 'want':51 'blend':4,55 'choic':39 'debat':9 'doesn':49 'first':11 'front':56 'maddi':22,25,26,35 'believ':36 'health':40 'repres':17 'america':28 'freedom':32 'patient':38 'shadegg':19 'republican':5</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6613023</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">false</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>google blog</scraped-from>
      <source>Pam's House Blend - Front Page </source>
      <source-url>http://www.pamshouseblend.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>Pam&amp;#39;s House Blend:: Republicans Using Props While Debating HR ...</title>
      <url>http://www.pamshouseblend.com/diary/14007/republicans-using-props-while-debating-hr-3962</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-blog>
    <recent-blog type="Commentary">
      <average-rating type="float" nil="true"></average-rating>
      <commentariable-id type="integer">400368</commentariable-id>
      <commentariable-type>Person</commentariable-type>
      <contains-term>democrat</contains-term>
      <created-at type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 22:09:41 -0600 2009</created-at>
      <date type="timestamp">Sat Nov 07 00:00:00 -0600 2009</date>
      <excerpt>Yes, John Shadegg actually used an innocent infant as a prop, spoke baby talk, and provided us with nothing more than what was most likely in Maddy&amp;#39;s diaper at the time. And for this, he got applause. The collective (im)maturity of the ...</excerpt>
      <fti-names>'im':51 'us':27 'got':47 'use':6,15 'yes':11 'babi':7,23 'john':12 'like':35 'noth':29 'prop':9,21 'talk':24 'time':42 'innoc':17 'maddi':37 'matur':52 'polit':2,56 'spoke':22 'video':4 'actual':14 'carniv':3,57 'diaper':39 'infant':18 'provid':26 'applaus':48 'collect':50 'shadegg':5,13</fti-names>
      <id type="integer">6613022</id>
      <is-news type="boolean">false</is-news>
      <is-ok type="boolean">true</is-ok>
      <scraped-from>google blog</scraped-from>
      <source>The Political Carnival </source>
      <source-url>http://thepoliticalcarnival.blogspot.com/</source-url>
      <status>OK</status>
      <title>The Political Carnival: VIDEO: Shadegg Uses Baby as Prop During ...</title>
      <url>http://thepoliticalcarnival.blogspot.com/2009/11/video-shadegg-uses-baby-maddy-as-prop.html</url>
      <weight type="integer" nil="true"></weight>
    </recent-blog>
  </recent-blogs>
</person>
