Del.icio.us
Digg
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Reddit
Newsvine
co.mments
| Term Start | Term End | Role | State | Party |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2010 | Senator | IL | Democrat |
Committee Membership
- Senate Foreign Relations
- Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
- Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
- Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services, and International Security
- State, Local, and Private Sector Preparedness and Integration (Ad Hoc)
- Senate Veterans' Affairs
Most Recent Sponsored Bills
Sponsored Bill Statistics
Recent Voting History
| Bill | Voted |
|---|---|
|
S.Con.Res.70 Budget resolution FY2009 On the Motion (Gregg Motion to Instruct Conferees (Discretionary Spending) re: S. Con. Res. 70 ) |
Abstain May 15, 2008 |
|
S.Con.Res.70 Budget resolution FY2009 On the Motion (Vitter Motion to Instruct Conferees (OCS) re: S. Con. Res. 70 ) |
Abstain May 15, 2008 |
|
S.Con.Res.70 Budget resolution FY2009 On the Motion (DeMint Motion to Instruct Conferees (China - India) re: S. Con. Res. 70 ) |
Abstain May 15, 2008 |
Voting Trends Analysis
- Most often votes with: Sen. Frank Lautenberg [D, NJ]
- Least often votes with: Sen. Jim DeMint [R, SC]
- Republican most often votes with: Sen. Olympia Snowe [R, ME]
- Democrat least often votes with: Sen. Ben Nelson [D, NE]
Barack Obama in the News
May 16, 2008 Obama's 'Sweetie': Spontaneous or Sexist?
By DAN HARRIS The recent flap over Sen. Barack Obama calling a female reporter "sweetie" sparked a national dialogue over what is acceptable language ...
May 16, 2008 A week after his 57-state remark, Obama puts himself in the wrong city
The Democratic frontrunner Sen. Barack Obama of another state, Illinois, had an enthusiastic double-barreled stump introduction from two local luminaries, ...
May 16, 2008 Lame presidents and the candidates they hurt
By Tom Curry WASHINGTON - President Bushâs apparent criticism of Sen. Barack Obama while addressing the Israeli Knesset has sparked an election year furor. ...
Barack Obama in the Blogs
May 17, 2008 Obama thanks Sioux City -- while in Sioux Falls!
But, you know, remembering different cities in fifty-seven states is a tough job. So we shouldn't judge him too harshly for forgetting what city he's in. The Democratic frontrunner Sen. Barack Obama of another state, Illinois, ...
Source: Right Wing News
Was this article useful?
Yes or
No
May 17, 2008 The strengthening of Obama
(May 17, 2008) -- Conventional wisdom suggests that these last two months have been bad news for Illinois Sen. Barack Obama. He hasn't been able to close the door on Democratic rival Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, ...
Source: More Opinion
Was this article useful?
Yes or
No
May 17, 2008 Herald-Leader Endorses Barack Obama
The opportunity for national renewal will be even greater if, as appears almost certain, Sen. Barack Obama is the nominee. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has waged a tough campaign. Her experience and mastery of the challenges facing the ...
Source: Out of the Mountains
Was this article useful?
Yes or
No
Information made available by:
Featured Members of Congress
On May 09, 2008 Barack Obama was featured on the homepage of OpenCongress:
Barack Obama's (D-IL) page views on OpenCongress have soared ahead of his presidential rival Hillary Clinton (D-NY) following the Indiana and North Carolina primaries. In recent days, Obama has surpassed Clinton in superdelegates for the first time in the campaign, and at least on of his colleagues in Congress has declared him the Democrats' presumptive nominee. As always, you can keep up with the latest on Senator Obama with OpenCongress' news and blog coverage.
Campaign Contributions
Top Contributor: Goldman Sachs ($535,678)
| Industry | Donation | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| Other | $17,254,499 | 23.1 % |
| Finance/Insur/RealEst | $16,041,331 | 21.5 % |
| Lawyers & Lobbyists | $13,998,437 | 18.8 % |
| Misc Business | $12,223,382 | 16.4 % |
| Communic/Electronics | $6,908,840 | 9.3 % |
| Health | $3,822,484 | 5.1 % |
| Construction | $1,496,270 | 2.0 % |
| Energy/Nat Resource | $880,751 | 1.2 % |
| Ideology/Single-Issue | $737,811 | 1.0 % |
| Agribusiness | $551,166 | 0.7 % |
| Transportation | $463,476 | 0.6 % |
| Defense | $145,345 | 0.2 % |
| Labor | $57,042 | 0.1 % |
| Total: | $74,580,834 |
Rating Filter: 5 (What's this?)(Close help)
Comments
(What's this?)(Close help)
Displaying 1-30 of 42 total comments.
Some of the things mentioned in the technology and innovation document would be amazing for a site like this. I would love to see what could be done when the government is actively working to get more information out there. I think it would actually get more people excited about the idea of participating too.
interesting voting history :-)
Does this guy have any opinions at all?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/20/201332/807/36/458633
A comprehensive listing of Clinton's and Obama's record. Chew on that for a little while.
Yes we can!
I would vote for him but because blacks are still being treat so unfair and I don't believe the king dream has come to pass. I very afraid for him as a black man. I believe he would win but I also believe after a term in the white house some crazy nut would kill him. But as a woman my vote goes to Hillary because I would like to see how a woman run a county and I would like to experience it. Then after that I vote for him after Hillary.
Well... at least you are are being honest unlike those who try to pretend they prefer this clown for political reasons.
If you don't think he knows the risk of running for president I think you are misunderstood. If you think he is better than Hillary for president then vote for him no matter if you think he will be assasinated. If he is willing to run and take all risk associated with that then dont hold that against him. But also, don't vote for him just because of his race. Either way, he doesn't have my vote though.
There are a couple main reasons I support Obama for president (along with some links which enumerate the points better than I could):
1) technology issues http://blag.xkcd.com/2008/01/28/obama/
2) ability to inspire/lead http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdDzvmY1XPo
The presidency isn't (or at least shouldn't be) about making all the decisions. The president is a leader. Someone who surrounds him or herself with intelligent and trustworthy people, and who inspires those people (and others in Congress) to come up with ideas and work together to achieve them. I'd like to return to the president being the leader of government rather than the boss of government. Plus, for as similar as Obama and Clinton are on most issues, their differences are extremely important to me. Obama has consulted Lawrence Lessig on a number of technological issues, which in and of itself is an indication that he's on the right path. Aside for that, he's expressed an interest in opening up government to make it far more transparent, which is also a critical issue IMO.
The technology are issues he borrowed from Hillery. George Bush as well as many evil leaders had the talent to inspire and lead. My vote goes to McCain.the first time I've ever voted republican.
The reason for so many "abstain" votes is because he's out on the campaign trail. The records for Clinton and McCain aren't much different.
Not exactly on the topic of Obama, but I think there's an interesting question to be asked here:
Why isn't there an accepted way for senators and representatives to vote while away from Washington? There are clearly important benefits to being in Washington for debating as well as voting, but there must be some way to find a balance here.
Good point, people can absentee vote in elections and the internet will eventually become part of democracy, why not start with the Senators on campaign. They are not doing their job while they are stumping and debating on TV.
if his campaign interferes with his job, shouldn't he ... I don't know ... perhaps, quit it, and let someone else do it. Not only he is collecting salary (that you and I pay ultimately), but also think about how well his constituents are represented.
Do we really want a president that cares that little about his job?
And the presidency is definitely absolutely and only about making decisions.
yes, other people come up with the ideas. but the decisions (which is about choosing the right one, and ways to implement it) is exactly what we need the president for.
I am sorry, Obama is just not it. Not even close.
"Why isn't there an accepted way for senators and representatives to vote while away from Washington?"
Great idea! While we are at it, let's come up with some ways for me to look like I am working while I am in Aruba too!
weasel: It's valid to say he should quite his job in order to campaign, but if you're going to lay that criticism on Obama, be sure to lay it equally on Senators Clinton and McCain (and all the other past and present senators and representatives that end up in the same situation when campaigning for president). It's a valid criticism, but Obama is in no way special in that regard. (Obama abstained in 25 of the last 30 votes, Clinton in 26 of the last 30, and McCain in 24 of the last 30)
I also agree it's important to be choosing the right decision, which is yet another reason I prefer Obama. A great deal of economists, for example, are against the idea of health insurance mandates. Obama's health insurance plan is more solidly rooted in behavioral economics, which I think is a huge plus.
The presidency has recently been only about making decisions, this is true. But originally the presidency was more about leadership and statesmanship. For a very long time, presidential vetoes were extremely rare, because if Congress - the elected representatives of the people - wanted to make a law, then the president signed it, unless he thought it was absolutely detrimental to the country as a whole. In recent decades, it has been that the president vetoes anything he disagrees with, which may or may not be a good thing. What is clear, though, is that the president has a very important role to play now in guiding Congress to decisions, which means working with people and inspiring them to work with each other. I have no doubt that even if Clinton's ideas are better (which I don't think they are, but even if they are), Obama would make far more progress towards implementing what are ultimately very similar ideas than Clinton would make in getting hers implemented.
We'll likely just have to agree to disagree, because it's unlikely anyone is going to change their mind over the internet. And I'm OK with that: I support Obama, but I'm certainly willing to support Clinton if she gets the nomination. I'd like to encourage you to check out the two links I posted though.
Anonymous: Heh, yes, there are clearly some issues with that. I didn't say I knew how they should do it, just that it's something which should be discussed. The trick is finding the right balance so that there is still incentive to actually be in DC for the vote. Perhaps something like counting votes from somewhere else as only half a vote, I don't know. It's just that the way the system is set up right now, it's absolutely prohibitive to anyone who would be a senator and presidential candidate simultaneously. As one of Obama's constituents, I understand this and don't hold it against him, but I do wish that he, and Senators Clinton and McCain were more able to do their jobs while also doing the rigorous work of campaigning. I certainly would have liked Obama and Clinton to have voted on the recent FISA amendments, but neither were able to.
"It's a valid criticism, but Obama is in no way special in that regard."
I never said he was special. In that regard or in any other.
That's exactly why I am not voting for him. And I don't know how anyone else could unless they are a racist. The only "special" thing about this candidate is his color.
"But originally the presidency was more about leadership and statesmanship."
You don't know the first thing about leadership if you don't understand it is all about decision making.
"I support Obama, but I'm certainly willing to support Clinton if she gets the nomination. "
Frnakly, I don't see much differnce between the two. Except for the race and gender, of course, but I, although it is so unpopular nowadays, I am not going to make my decisions based on those factors. I think they are irrelevant, unless you are a racist.
"The trick is finding the right balance so that there is still incentive to actually be in DC for the vote."
The incentive is you and me. If you are going to continue cutting slack to them and trying to justify their skipping work for personal gain, they'll continue doing that. After all, why the hell not?
"it's absolutely prohibitive to anyone who would be a senator and presidential candidate simultaneously."
So what? If I wanted to move to Hollywood and become an actor, I should not expect they'd let me to keep my present job for a while as well, should I?
Oh, and about his health care plan.... Just like all other socialist ideas, it doesn't affect me or my family in any way, except, that we are going to have to pay for it.
If you got a job, you are in the same boat too.
If you don't I'd suggest that you go find one - that'll change your perspective quite a bit.
OK, first, the implication that the only reason somsone would choose Obama over Clinton is because of racism is ridiculous. That's no different than saying the only reason to choose Clinton over Obama is sexism. Both are obviously not true (and, by that logic, one must be either a racist or a sexist to have any preference in the Democratic nomination).
Second, it appears you've essentially outed yourself as a Republican supporter seeking to make negative comments on Obama's page, in which case I have no interest to continue discussion here beyond this comment. Calling either of their health care plans "socialist" is clearly not something a supporter of *either* would do. (It's also further from the truth in the case of Obama, since he is opposed to mandates for adults).
Lastly, suggesting that I may not have a job - and the implication that you consider me to be an ignorant youth - is quite insulting to me. I'll admit to being in the 18-29 demographic (though I won't bother describing where), but I most certainly have not only a full time job, but I spent my years in college earning my degree in political science. I know plenty about the role of the president and the different variations in leadership style it has gone through over the years, and I have no interest in accepting being insulted by someone whose only purpose here appears to be criticizing Obama in hopes of helping Clinton gain the nomination, so that your own candidate can have a better shot at the presidency. (For those who are unaware, recent polls indicate that if the election were held today, Clinton and McCain would be very close, where Obama would win by about 7%.)
Seriously..."socialist ideas?" Give me a break.
Oh I am sorry. I did not know this page was off limits for "non-supporters".
I did not suggest that you did not have a job, much less imply anything about your age. You have to learn to actually listen to your opponent if you want to ever be able to have an intelligent discussion. It is quite characteristic for socialists to ignore the real arguments, and instead respond to imaginary ones.
I support Obama's candidacy. It is time everyone is able to witness and participate in a changing process. I offer my services translating into Spanishdocuments for the campaign. Counsel advisers to remind him that he needs to secure Puerto Rican votes by addressing the island leaders. Leonora
How Dangerous is Obama?
This article proves that he's merely a tool for the world government and promoter of a tax to be paid to the UN to fuel its totalitarian control over us and to redistribute the wealth to other countries.
"A nice-sounding bill called the "Global Poverty Act," sponsored by Democratic presidential candidate and Senator Barack Obama, is up for a Senate vote on Thursday and could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States. The bill, which has the support of many liberal religious groups, makes levels of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations."
"The bill defines the term "Millennium Development Goals" as the goals set out in the United Nations Millennium Declaration, General Assembly Resolution 55/2 (2000)."
"In addition to seeking to eradicate poverty, that declaration commits nations to banning "small arms and light weapons" and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child."
Read the rest here: http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/ckincaid/2008/ck_02131.shtml
the republicans are voteing for obama so that he will get the nomination,i'v heard this on two talk shows ,bill oan c-span washington jurn.
HELP OUR KIDS IN THE FOSTER CARE SYSTEM ALL OVER WE NEED FOSTER CARE REFORM TO STOP THESE KIDS FROM BEING RAPED AND BEING USED AS SEX TOYS IN 2008! THE POOR PROPLE'S CAMPAIGN INC MR JERRY ROBINSON TIME TO STAND UP IN 2008 !!
HELP OUR KIDS IN THE FOSTER CARE SYSTEM ALL OVER WE NEED FOSTER CARE REFORM TO STOP THESE KIDS FROM BEING RAPED AND BEING USED AS SEX TOYS IN 2008! THE POOR PEOPLE'S CAMPAIGN INC MR JERRY ROBINSON TIME TO STAND UP IN 2008 !!
STOP BILL HR 1955 AND S BILL 1959
we need hope and help to spot discrimination in the va hospitals. we as vets are treated so bad at va clinic . we are told to stop looking for hand out. to detour us from getting. i had my fore head allmost blow off . 33 years ago. i can;t even get help . the va has me a post tramaic sydrom it is ptsd. try to explain it to the va .no help we need a change in our gov for the best for our troops that severd this to protect us i did vote for obama. we need change not a pacon place affairs and disgace in our country
in my opinion i believe i should vote for Barack Obama, i not voting because of his race but because he seem to be a better president in future. however i do not mind whoever the presidency, the matter is who who will keep US as a better country that is the person that people want really.
In my opinion i believe i should vote for Barack Obama, i am not voting because of his race but because he seem to be a better president in future. however i do not mind whoever win the presidency, the matter is who who will keep US as a better country? that is the person that people want really.
Senator Obama:Please vote for bill HR5173/S1200 to delay or stop the cuts for medicaid/medicare case management. This service is so important for local health departments, hospitals and commuity programs. Not to mention the number of people who will be out of work. I beleive that our citizens come first, but I don't want to lose my job where I have been for 20 years.
Mr obama, start rallying with americans for extended benefits and help with the more food stamps and you will get my vote, Don't go on like Clinton about the allternative energy jobs that look like a pipe dream right now.. We need you..
Homeland Security Satellites dangerous to all U S Citizens.
Fear has gripped the Government and many people of The United States, causing havoc among all citizens. Not in history of civilization has such atrocities been realized. Spying and torture has become a common practice to any individual not living the productive life, people who live peacefully, people who are satisfied with their lives.
Once the Government considers a person or persons unproductive, they are considered alien and a danger to the society. The government fears these people for their disrupting the overall progress of the American Way. Growth and prosperity has become a major concern to those people dwelling in luxury and vanity, while individuals who are satisfied with the common way of living are scrutinized and condemned for being lazy and indifferent to any advancement.
America is the product of devastation to the planet Earth, and to the realm of outer space. The government has sold-out to the destruction of the planet with endless violations, removing the material resources and destroying natural environment, ending nearly all ecosystems of other forms of life.
The End
Add A Comment