wseltzer’s Actions

 
Subscribe

wseltzer’s Letters to Congress

No letters to Congress written yet.

wseltzer’s Comments

wseltzer 01/21/2008 1:48pm

From my blog:

Entertainment lobbyists have dumped a nasty trojan horse into this bill, with a requirement that educational institutions spend their scarce resources to

develop a plan for offering alternatives to illegal downloading or peer-to-peer distribution of intellectual property as well as a plan to explore technology-based deterrents to prevent such illegal activity.

So even as the committee asserts it wants to “make college more affordable and accessible,” it frustrates that purpose by letting Hollywood-driven mandates suck money away from the educational mission of colleges and universities. While “encourag[ing] colleges to rein in price increases,” the bill would force campuses to spend money exploring broken anti peer-to-peer technologies that make their networks less useful. Colleges that don’t fall into line risk losing federal student aid.

“Technology-based deterrents” are bound to be both over- and under-inclusive: blocking true educational uses while failing to stop piracy. A school cannot screen or filter all its Internet traffic without seriously impeding network innovation and research. If the “deterrents” block unknown communications, they stop students from experimenting on an end-to-end network, blocking the development of lawful peer-to-peer applications in the mold of Skype, distributed search, or LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe), a library archival system. If they block encrypted traffic, they compromise privacy and security. If they don’t, they’re trivially circumvented.

Finally, there’s no automated way to determine whether “unauthorized” uses are fair. Even were a technology to have perfect access to all Internet traffic for comparison against a corpus of works, it would not be able to incorporate the judge necessary to determine whether a given use were fair, transformative, educational, or merely substitutive and unfair.

Half-baked ideas like these have no place in an education bill. Rather than forcing schools to spend scarce resources on entertainment companies’ agendas, Hollywood should do its own homework, offering students enough compelling, compatible alternatives that they choose authorized access.

wseltzer 01/16/2008 6:54am

This bill would burden the federal government with a new “Intellectual Property Enforcement Division,” diverting the Justice Department’s attention from more pressing enforcement matters.

Federal enforcement further externalizes the cost of intellectual property from its rights-holders onto the general public. If IP protection costs too much for the rights-holders to bear themselves, perhaps it isn’t worth its cost to society.


Number of Comments: 2
Average Comment Rating (0-10): 7.4
Comments Per Day: 0.00

wseltzer’s Supported Bills

No supported bills yet.


wseltzer’s Opposed Bills

Bill Status Last Action
H.R.4279 PRO-IP Act of 2007 (110th congress) House Passed May 12, 2008
S.2248 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 Amendments Act of 2008 (110th congress) Senate Passed Feb 12, 2008
S.1957 Design Piracy Prohibition Act (110th congress) Introduced Aug 02, 2007